1. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervicalspine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958 40-A:607-24.
2. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, et al. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38:1226-32.
3. Salzmann SN, Derman PB, Lampe LP, et al. Cervical spinal fusion: 16-year trends in epidemiology, indications, and inhospital outcomes by surgical approach. World Neurosurg 2018 113:e280-95.
4. Goz V, Buser Z, D’Oro A, et al. Complications and risk factors using structural allograft versus synthetic cage: analysis 17 783 anterior cervical discectomy and fusions using a national registry. Global Spine J 2019 9:388-92.
6. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK, et al. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. Spine J 2003 3:451-9.
7. Miller LE, Block JE. Safety and effectiveness of bone allografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Spine 2011 36:2045-50.
8. Niu CM, Liao JM, Chen WM, et al. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010 23:310-6.
9. Buttermann GR. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: a prospective study. Spine 2018 43:207-14.
12. Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, et al. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine J 2015 15:2016-27.
13. Jain A, Marrache M, Harris A, et al. Structural allograft versus PEEK implants in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2019 2192568219883256.
14. Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, et al. What is the fate of pseudarthrosis detected 1 year after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018 43:E23-8.
15. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005 43:1130-9.
16. Krause KL, Obayashi JT, Bridges KJ, et al. Fivefold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with polyetheretherketone interbody device than with structural allograft used for 1-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2018 30:46-51.
20. Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Santos ER. Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). J Clin Neurosci 2017 38:118-21.
21. Pirkle S, Kaskovich S, Cook DJ, et al. Cages in ACDF are associated with a higher nonunion rate than allograft: a stratified comparative analysis of 6130 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019 44:384-8.
22. Veeravagu A, Cole T, Jiang B, Ratlif JK. Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study. Spine J 2014 14:1125-31.
23. Virk SS, Elder JB, Sandhu HS, et al. The cost effectiveness of polyetheretheketone (PEEK) cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015 28:482.