1. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013 7:3-9.
3. Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997 79:664-74.
4. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D'Amato CR, et al. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30:2068. -75. discussion 76-7.
7. Karol LA, Johnston CE, Browne RH, et al. Progression of the curve in boys who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993 75:1804-10.
8. Xu L, Yang X, Wang Y, et al. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with curve between 40° and 45°: effectiveness and related factors. World Neurosurg 2019 126:e901-6.
9. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, et al. Brace treatment of idiopathic scoliosis is effective for a curve over 40 degrees, but is the evaluation of Cobb angle the only parameter for the indication of treatment? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019 55:231-40.
10. Lusini M, Donzelli S, Minnella S, et al. Brace treatment is effective in idiopathic scoliosis over 45 degrees: an observational prospective cohort controlled study. Spine J 2014 14:1951-6.
11. Negrini S, Negrini F, Fusco C, et al. Idiopathic scoliosis patients with curves more than 45 Cobb degrees refusing surgery can be effectively treated through bracing with curve improvements. Spine J 2011 11:369-80.
12. Weiss HR, Tournavitis N, Seibel S, et al. A prospective cohort study of AIS patients with 40 degrees and More Treated with a Gensingen Brace (GBW): preliminary results. Open Orthop J 2017 11:1558-67.
13. Zhu Z, Xu L, Jiang L, et al. Is brace treatment appropriate for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients refusing surgery with Cobb angle between 40 and 50 degrees. Clin Spine Surg 2017 30:85-9.
14. Verhofste BP, Whitaker AT, Glotzbecker MP, et al. Efficacy of bracing in skeletally immature patients with moderate–severe idiopathic scoliosis curves between 40° and 60°. Spine Deform 2020 8:911-20.
15. Lang C, Sui W, Di M, et al. Factors that influence in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2019 123:e597-603.
16. Khoshbin A, Caspi L, Law PW, et al. Outcomes of bracing in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis until skeletal maturity or surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015 40:50-5.
17. Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, et al. The effect of the risser stage on bracing outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016 98:1253-9.
18. Blount WP, Bolinske J. Physical therapy in the nonoperative treatment of scoliosis. Phys Ther 1967 47:919-25.
19. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, et al. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89:64-73.
20. Thompson RM, Hubbard EW, Jo CH, et al. Brace success is related to curve type in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017 99:923-8.
21. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, et al. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:1813-25.
22. Zheng Y, Dang Y, Yang Y, et al. Whether orthotic management and exercise are equally effective to the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Mainland China? A randomized controlled trial study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018 43:E494-503.
23. Lonstein JE, Winter RB. The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994 76:1207-21.
24. Fisher DA, Rapp GF, Emkes M. Idiopathic scoliosis:transcutaneous muscle stimulation versus the Milwaukee brace. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987 12:987-91.
25. Ohrt-Nissen S, Hallager DW, Gehrchen M, et al. Flexibility predicts curve progression in providence nighttime bracing of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:1724-30.
26. Katz DE, Durrani AA. Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 26:2354-61.
27. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Dang X, et al. Factors relating to curve progression in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace. Eur Spine J 2015 24:244-8.
28. He C, To MK, Chan CK, et al. Significance of recumbent curvature in prediction of in-orthosis correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019 43:163-9.
29. Xu L, Qin X, Qiu Y, et al. Initial correction rate can be predictive of the outcome of brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 2017 30:E475-9.
30. van den Bogaart M, van Royen BJ, Haanstra TM, et al. Predictive factors for brace treatment outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a best-evidence synthesis. Eur Spine J 2019 28:511-25.
31. Lou E, Raso JV, Hill DL, et al. Correlation between quantity and quality of orthosis wear and treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004 28:49-54.
32. Mak I, Lou E, Raso JV, et al. The effect of time on qualitative compliance in brace treatment for AIS. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008 32:136-44.