1. Arantes Júnior AA, Silva Junior GA, Malheiros JA, Gonçalves FF, Magaldi M, Santiago E, et al. A new expansive two-open-doors laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: technical report and follow-up results. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2014 72:49-54. PMID:
24637983.
2. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 1995 19:116-121. PMID:
7649681.
3. Charles YP, Schuller S, Sfeir G, Steib JP. French door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2013 22:2123-2125. PMID:
23989742.
4. Denaro V, Longo UG, Berton A, Salvatore G, Denaro L. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2015 24(Suppl 7):832-841. PMID:
26530299.
5. Fei Q, Li J, Su N, Wang B, Li D, Meng H, et al. Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2015 11:1707-1718. PMID:
26604771.
6. Hirai T, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, Kato T, Tomizawa S, Sakai K, et al. Presence of anterior compression of the spinal cord after laminoplasty inhibits upper extremity motor recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:377-384. PMID:
21540767.
7. Hiraizumi Y. Spinal cord anterior decompression for delayed spinal cord paralysis after osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: application of thoracoscopic approach. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2008 73:67-73. PMID:
18683534.
8. Kaplan L, Bronstein Y, Barzilay Y, Hasharoni A, Finkelstein J. Canal expansive laminoplasty in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Isr Med Assoc J 2006 8:548-552. PMID:
16958245.
9. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995 77:956-961. PMID:
7593114.
10. Laiginhas AR, Silva PA, Pereira P, Vaz R. Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up after laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol Int 2015 6:162PMID:
26543671.
11. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, et al. Modified double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical outcome in 520 patients and technique description. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013 26:135-140. PMID:
22105107.
12. Martin-Benlloch JA, Maruenda-Paulino JI, Barra-Pla A, Laguia-Garzaran M. Expansive laminoplasty as a method for managing cervical multilevel spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:680-684. PMID:
12671355.
13. Nayeb Aghaei H, Azimi P, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Mohammadi HR, Alizadeh P, et al. Outcome measures of functionality, social interaction, and pain in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a validation study for the iranian version of the copenhagen neck functional disability scale. Asian Spine J 2015 9:901-908. PMID:
26713123.
14. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 2015 40:E675-E693. PMID:
25839387.
15. Park HG, Zhang HY, Lee SH. Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes. Korean J Spine 2014 11:152-156. PMID:
25346761.
16. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 2003 98(3 Suppl):230-238. PMID:
12691377.
17. Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, Hirabayashi K. Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J 2001 1:26-30. PMID:
14588365.
18. Sheen JJ, Jeon SR. Midline splitting cervical laminoplasty using allogeneic bone spacers: comparison of fusion rates between cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Korean J Neurotrauma 2014 10:60-65. PMID:
27169035.
19. Shufflebarger HL, King WF. Composite measurement of scoliosis: a new method of analysis of the deformity. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 1987 12:228-232. PMID:
3589817.
20. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:1258-1262. PMID:
12811268.
21. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
22. Umeda M, Sasai K, Kushida T, Wakabayashi E, Maruyama T, Ikeura A, et al. A less-invasive cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy that preserves the semispinalis cervicis muscles and nuchal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine 2013 18:545-552. PMID:
23540735.
23. Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 2004 62:487-492. PMID:
15576110.
24. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 1992 17:1281-1284. PMID:
1462201.
25. Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhou X, Cui C. Laminoplasty versus skip laminectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014 134:1-7. PMID:
24202410.