Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Ganesh M. Shankar"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Ganesh M. Shankar"

Corrigendum

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):473-473.   Published online June 30, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):473-473.   Published online June 30, 2020
Close

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Polyetheretherketone vs Titanium Cages in Spinal Fusion: Spin Bias in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Henry Avetisian, Apurva Prasad, Kevin Mathew, David McCavitt, William J. Karakash, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond J. Hah, Ram K. Alluri
    Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • Titanium Cages versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Mohammad Daher, Marven Aoun, Charbel Farhat, Gaby Kreichati, Khalil Kharrat, Alan H. Daniels, Amer Sebaaly
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 193: 15.     CrossRef
  • Effect of cage surface geometry on load transfer and ranges of motion in a fused lumbar spine model: A comparative finite element analysis
    Tirtharaj Banerjee, Kishore Pradeep, Aritra Karar, Bidyut Pal
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2025; 239(5): 423.     CrossRef
  • 10-Year trend of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and the impact of 3D-printed titanium in a high-volume academic center
    Marco D. Burkhard, Ali E. Guven, Anna-Maria Mielke, Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Torben Stepan, Bruno Verna, Erika Chiapparelli, Jennifer Shue, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Andrew A. Sama, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study
    P. Vanek, N. Svoboda, O. Bradac, J. Malik, R. Kaiser, D. Netuka
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(1): 332.     CrossRef
  • Titanium-coated PEEK Versus Uncoated PEEK Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zheng-tao Lv, Yong Xu, Bin Cao, Jun Dai, Si-yuan Zhang, Jun-ming Huang, Shuang Liang, Feng-xian Jiang
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(5): 198.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes between the n‐HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched‐Pair Case Control Study
    Zhuang Zhang, Bo‐wen Hu, Liang Wang, Hui‐liang Yang, Tao Li, Li‐min Liu, Xi Yang, Yue‐ming Song
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(1): 152.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Qian Chen, Youwei Ai, Yong Huang, Qiujiang Li, Juehan Wang, Hong Ding, Ce Zhu, Ganjun Feng, Limin Liu
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(11): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review
    Elia Marin, Alex Lanzutti
    Materials.2023; 17(1): 114.     CrossRef
  • Development of a decision-making pathway for utilizing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Dominik Adl Amini, Manuel Moser, Lisa Oezel, Jiaqi Zhu, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa, Federico P. Girardi, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(7): 1611.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical analysis of stand-alone lumbar interbody cages versus 360° constructs: an in vitro and finite element investigation
    Ali Kiapour, Elie Massaad, Amin Joukar, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ganesh M. Shankar, Vijay K. Goel, John H. Shin
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(6): 928.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage
    Dominik Adl Amini, Ichiro Okano, Lisa Oezel, Jiaqi Zhu, Erika Chiapparelli, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa, Federico P. Girardi, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2021; 30(8): 2377.     CrossRef
  • 6,492 View
  • 98 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):125-135.   Published online March 31, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):125-135.   Published online March 31, 2020
Close
Objective
Lumbar fusion with implantation of interbody cage is a common procedure for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. This study aims to compare the fusion and subsidence rates of titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and investigate the effect of clinical and radiological outcomes following fusion on patient-reported outcomes.
Methods
A systematic search strategy of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) was conducted using different MeSH (medical subject headings) terms until January 2020. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed and random-effect models based upon the heterogeneity (I2) to estimate the association between interbody cages and the measured outcomes.
Results
A total of 1,094 patients from 11 studies were reviewed. The final analysis included 421 patients (38.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a Ti and/or a Ti-coated interbody cage and 673 patient (61.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a PEEK cage. Overall, PEEK interbody devices were associated with a significantly lower fusion rate compared with Ti interbody devices (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.93; p = 0.02). There was no difference in subsidence rates between Ti and PEEK groups (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54–1.52; p = 0.71). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS)-low back pain (p = 0.14) and Japanese Orthopedic Association scale (p = 0.86) between the 2 groups. However, the PEEK group had lower odds of leg pain after surgery compared to the Ti group (OR [VAS-leg], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.28–0.94; p = 0.003).
Conclusion
Ti and Ti-coated PEEK cages used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion are associated with similar rates of subsidence, but a higher rate of fusion compared to PEEK interbody cages. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better assess the effect of cage materials and potential factors that could influence the outcomes of interbody lumbar fusion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Evaluation of three methods of coaxial endoscopic lumbar fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective cohort study
    Wenbo Diao, Xueya Feng, Yuanli Li, Jian Gao, Haoran Chen, Qianchun Li
    Neurosurgical Review.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages Compared With Open TLIF: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates
    Sang Hyub Lee, Junghan Seo, Dain Jeong, Sang Youp Han, Dong Hyun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S28.     CrossRef
  • Osteointegration and Fusion After TLIF: Trabecular Titanium Cage with SVF-Hydrogel Compared with PEEK Cage.
    Murat U. Baidarbekov, Zhangir N. Ipmagambetov, Nailya DeLellis, Olzhas S. Bekarissov, Margulan S. Abdikalikov, Daniyar Zh. Yestay
    Orthopedic Reviews.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ali Chahlavi
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(3): 1598.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review on the State of the Art in the research and development of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) biomaterial-based implants
    Prabaha Sikder
    Acta Biomaterialia.2025; 191: 29.     CrossRef
  • 3D printed titanium banana interbody cages versus titanium-coated PEEK bullet cages for TLIF
    Connor C. Jacob, Ryan Eaton, Jacob Ward, Katelyn Sette, Seth Wilson, Matthieu D. Weber, Olivia Duru, Alexander Keister, Markus E. Harrigan, Andrew J. Grossbach, Stephanus Viljoen
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2025; 249: 108731.     CrossRef
  • Verification of the Cage Stability and the Superiority of Titanium Coating in the Bone Fusion of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Polyetheretherketone Cages
    Kazutaka Masamoto, Shimei Tanida, Bungo Otsuki, Shunsuke Fujibayashi
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Healthcare Outcomes of Patients Treated with 3D-Printed-Titanium and PEEK Cages During Fusion Procedures in the Lumbar Spine
    Katherine Corso, Andreas Teferra, Annalisa Michielli, Kristin Corrado, Amy Marcini, Mark Lotito, Caroline Smith, Michelle Costa, Jill Ruppenkamp, Anna Wallace
    Medical Devices: Evidence and Research.2025; Volume 18: 37.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Polyetheretherketone Versus 3D-Printed Titanium Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Single Institution’s Experience
    Diang Liu, Julie L. Chan, Art Eleanore, Kristin DeCost, Justin Luk, Lissette C. Neukam, Tasneem Zaihra Rizvi, Zhibang Lin, Zoher Ghogawala, Subu N. Magge, Andrew Y. Yew, Robert G. Whitmore
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(6): 1813.     CrossRef
  • Expandable cage technology in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: where are we and what does the future hold?
    Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Noah Willett, Evan Wang, Sean Inzerillo, Ibrahim Hussain
    Expert Review of Medical Devices.2025; 22(4): 349.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haozhong Wang, Hao Zhang, Changming Xiao, Kaiquan Zhang, Lisheng Qi
    Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding the influence of cage and instrumentation strategies with oblique lumbar interbody fusion for grade I spondylolisthesis – A comprehensive biomechanical modeling study
    Mathieu Chayer, Philippe Phan, Pierre-Jean Arnoux, Zhi Wang, Jeremy J. Rawlinson, Olumide Aruwajoye, Carl-Éric Aubin
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(10): 2312.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Cage Material (PEEK vs. Titanium) on Subsidence, Fusion, and Patient-reported Outcomes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Forrest Hamrick, Robert B. Kim, Andrew T. Dailey, Erica F. Bisson, Mark A. Mahan, Marcus D. Mazur
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preclinical evaluation of lateral interbody fusions using 3D printed PEEK or 3D printed titanium cages
    William Robert Walsh, Matthew Pelletier, Dan Wills, Tian Wang, Max Lloyd, Michael Veldman, Nick Cordaro, Mark Brady
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 23: 100756.     CrossRef
  • ‘Rebound Phenomenon’ – a Cause of Early Cage Back-out in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Insights from Case Series of 1545 Patients
    Jvahar Jill, Sathish Muthu, Guna Pratheep Kalanchiam, Nalli Ramanathan Uvaraj
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.2025; 59(12): 2126.     CrossRef
  • Application of Biocomposite Hydrogel With Developed Trabecular Cage in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Clinical Case Report
    Murat U. Baidarbekov, Olzhas S. Bekarisov, Zhangir N. Ipmagambetov, Margulan S. Abdigalikov, Agzam A. Akimbekov
    Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unilateral biportal endoscopy for minimally invasive spinal fusion: Advancements in biomaterials and clinical outcome optimization
    Song Fu, Li-Chuan Hou, Xiao-Ling Huang, Wei Zhao, Feng-Ming Wang, Ya-Nan Wang
    World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Incorporating Paraspinal Muscle Quality to Predict Cage Subsidence Risk Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Lei Deng, Xingyu You, Zhairui Shen, Xiao Sun, Jun Zou, Fanguo Lin, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Hao Liu
    Spine.2025; 50(20): 1375.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the anti-subsidence mechanical properties of novel 3D-printed titanium cages compared to conventional titanium cages
    Huiming Yang, Yuhang Wang, Junxian Miao, Jiangtao Wang, Hao Li, Yang Zhang, Liang Yan, Biao Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Titanium-Based Biomaterial for Human Bone Scaffolds: Narrative Review on Design, Fabrication, Surface Engineering, Implantation, and Biological Evaluation
    Sichale W. Fita, Mirosław Bonek, Anna Woźniak, Sebastian Sławski
    Materials.2025; 18(23): 5421.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Clinical Indicators of Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Diseases Operated with Posterior Access Using the PEEK Cage
    Murat Umirkhanovich Baidarbekov, Olzhas Sapargalievich Bekarissov, Zhangir Narimanovich Ipmagambetov, Alexandr Yuryevich Chsherbina, Margulan Serikbayevich Abdikalikov, Rinat Akhmetrizovich Chekaev, Kaldygul Musaevna Yeldashbaeva
    West Kazakhstan Medical Journal.2025; 67(4): 410.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study
    P. Vanek, N. Svoboda, O. Bradac, J. Malik, R. Kaiser, D. Netuka
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(1): 332.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility analysis of wireless power delivery to implanted sensors of XLIF patients
    Subhas C. Mukhopadhyay, Isaac Senn, Vivek Ramakrishna, Boby George, Gangadhara Prusty, Ashish Diwan
    International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3D-printed porous titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of subsidence
    Shu-Xin Liu, Teng-Hui Zeng, Chien-Min Chen, Li-Ru He, An-Ping Feng, Shang-Wun Jhang, Guang-Xun Lin
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yu-Cheng Yao, Po-Hsin Chou, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Shih-Tien Wang, Ming-Chau Chang
    Global Spine Journal.2023; 13(2): 472.     CrossRef
  • A novel injectable hydrogel containing polyetheretherketone for bone regeneration in the craniofacial region
    Mahdieh Alipour, Marjan Ghorbani, Masume Johari khatoonabad, Marziyeh Aghazadeh
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Near-Surface Nanomechanics of Medical-Grade PEEK Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy
    Marco Bontempi, Rosario Capozza, Andrea Visani, Milena Fini, Gianluca Giavaresi, Alessandro Gambardella
    Polymers.2023; 15(3): 718.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Interbody Implants on the Biomechanical Behavior of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study
    Hangkai Shen, Jia Zhu, Chenhui Huang, Dingding Xiang, Weiqiang Liu
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2023; 14(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
    Songfeng Li, Xiyong Li, Xiaohui Bai, Yunlu Wang, Pengfei Han, Hongzhuo Li
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies
    Neal A. Patel, Sinead O’Bryant, Christopher D. Rogers, Candler K. Boyett, Sachiv Chakravarti, Julian Gendreau, Nolan J. Brown, Zach A. Pennington, Neill B. Hatcher, Cathleen Kuo, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham
    Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 451.     CrossRef
  • Response to the letter to the editor regarding “Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion”
    Mohamed A.R. Soliman, Alexander O. Aguirre, Cathleen C. Kuo, Rehman Ali Baig, Asham Khan, Jeffrey P. Mullin, John Pollina
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(8): 1239.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a risk prediction model for cage subsidence after instrumented posterior lumbar fusion based on machine learning: a retrospective observational cohort study
    Tuotuo Xiong, Ben Wang, Wanyuan Qin, Ling Yang, Yunsheng Ou
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Non-window Three-Dimensional–Printed Porous Titanium Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Pilot Trial
    Dae-Woong Ham, Chan-Woo Jung, Dong-Gune Chang, Jae Jun Yang, Kwang-Sup Song
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2023; 15(6): 960.     CrossRef
  • Morphometric Comparison of Interbody Fusion with Cage and Autograft at L4-L5 Levels versus Autograft Alone for Fusion
    Azmi Tufan, Feyza Karagöz Güzey, Abdurrahman Aycan
    Bagcilar Medical Bulletin.2023; 8(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between the elastic modulus of the cage material and the biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A logarithmic regression analysis based on parametric finite element simulations
    Teng Lu, Jiakun Ren, Zhongwei Sun, Jing Zhang, Kai Xu, Lu Sun, Pinglin Yang, Dong Wang, Yueyun Lian, Jingjing Zhai, Yali Gou, Yanbing Ma, Shengfeng Ji, Xijing He, Baohui Yang
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.2022; 214: 106570.     CrossRef
  • 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model
    Joseph L. Laratta, Bradley J. Vivace, Mónica López-Peña, Fernando Muñoz Guzón, Antonio Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra, Alberto Jorge-Mora, Rosa Maria Villar-Liste, Laura Pino-Lopez, Alexandr Lukyanchuk, Erik Arden Taghizadeh, Jesús Pino-Minguez
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(6): 1016.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Satoshi Nomura, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(5): 1374.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Biomimetic Topographies and Their Role in Promoting Bone Formation and Osseointegration: Implications for Clinical Use
    Michael B. Berger, Paul Slosar, Zvi Schwartz, David J. Cohen, Stuart B. Goodman, Paul A. Anderson, Barbara D. Boyan
    Biomimetics.2022; 7(2): 46.     CrossRef
  • Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance
    Guy Fogel, Nicholas Martin, Gregory M. Williams, Jesse Unger, Christian Yee-Yanagishita, Matthew Pelletier, William Walsh, Yun Peng, Michael Jekir
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 162: e626.     CrossRef
  • Approaches to Biofunctionalize Polyetheretherketone for Antibacterial: A Review
    Yihan Wang, Shutao Zhang, Bin’en Nie, Xinhua Qu, Bing Yue
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evolution of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium interbody devices for spinal procedures: a comprehensive review of the literature
    Nallammai Muthiah, Yagiz Ugur Yolcu, Nima Alan, Nitin Agarwal, David Kojo Hamilton, Alp Ozpinar
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(10): 2547.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: Current concepts and future directions
    Markus Laubach, Philipp Kobbe, Dietmar W. Hutmacher
    Biomaterials.2022; 288: 121699.     CrossRef
  • Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Mohamed A.R. Soliman, Alexander O. Aguirre, Cathleen C. Kuo, Nicco Ruggiero, Shady Azmy, Asham Khan, Moleca M. Ghannam, Neil D. Almeida, Patrick K. Jowdy, Jeffrey P. Mullin, John Pollina
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(12): 2017.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Nattapat Tangchitcharoen, Stephen J. Kerr, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Vit Kotheeranurak, Worawat Limthongkul
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 168: e471.     CrossRef
  • Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinically Used Cages
    Francesca Veronesi, Maria Sartori, Cristiana Griffoni, Marcelo Valacco, Giuseppe Tedesco, Paolo Francesco Davassi, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Milena Fini, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(21): 6279.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical comparison of subsidence performance among three modern porous lateral cage designs
    Christian Yee-Yanagishita, Guy Fogel, Brooke Douglas, Gregory Essayan, Brijesh Poojary, Nicholas Martin, Gregory M. Williams, Yun Peng, Michael Jekir
    Clinical Biomechanics.2022; 99: 105764.     CrossRef
  • An alternative method to evaluate lumbar interbody fusion status focusing on position change of screw-rod constructs
    Atsushi Yamamoto, Satoru Tanioka, Masashi Fujimoto, Hirofumi Nishikawa, Yusuke Kamei, Munenari Ikezawa, Fujimaro Ishida, Takahiro Miyazaki, Hidenori Suzuki, Masaki Mizuno
    European Radiology.2022; 33(3): 1545.     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcome of minimal invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis
    Jun Seok Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Su Hun Lee, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song, Young Ha Kim, Chang Hwa Choi
    Medicine.2022; 101(48): e31879.     CrossRef
  • Superior Osteo-Inductive and Osteo-Conductive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. PEEK Scaffolds on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Proof of Concept for the Use of Fusion Cages
    Enrico Ragni, Carlotta Perucca Orfei, Alessandro Bidossi, Elena De Vecchi, Natale Francaviglia, Alberto Romano, Gianluca Maestretti, Fulvio Tartara, Laura de Girolamo
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(5): 2379.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Vadim A. Byvaltsev, Andrei A. Kalinin, Morgan B. Giers, Valerii V. Shepelev, Yurii Ya. Pestryakov, Mikhail Yu. Biryuchkov
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(5): 906.     CrossRef
  • Polyetheretherketone for orthopedic applications: a review
    Yi-Hsun Yu, Shih-Jung Liu
    Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.2021; 32: 100687.     CrossRef
  • A Prospective, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Synthetic Bone Graft Material DBM Gel with rhBMP-2 versus DBM Gel Used during the TLIF Procedure in Patients with Lumbar Disc Disease
    Seung-Jae Hyun, Seung Hwan Yoon, Joo Han Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun Jae Shin, Jiin Kang, Yoon Ha
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(4): 562.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Bridging Bone in a Newly Designed Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Finite Element Analysis
    Jeongik Lee, Seung-Hwan Chang, Hyung-Chul Cho, Kwang-Sup Song
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 154: e389.     CrossRef
  • PEEK Versus Titanium Static Interbody Cages
    Jose A. Canseco, Brian A. Karamian, Parthik D. Patel, Srikanth N. Divi, Tyler Timmons, Haydn Hallman, Ryan Nachwalter, Joseph K. Lee, Mark F. Kurd, D. Greg Anderson, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(8): E483.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion
    Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875.     CrossRef
  • Polyetheretherketone and Its Composites for Bone Replacement and Regeneration
    Chengzhu Liao, Yuchao Li, Sie Chin Tjong
    Polymers.2020; 12(12): 2858.     CrossRef
  • PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence
    Peter G. Campbell, David A. Cavanaugh, Pierce Nunley, Philip A. Utter, Eubulus Kerr, Rishi Wadhwa, Marcus Stone
    Neurosurgical Focus.2020; 49(3): E10.     CrossRef
  • 15,347 View
  • 891 Download
  • 55 Web of Science
  • 57 Crossref

Technical Note

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Novel Technique for C1–2 Interlaminar Arthrodesis Utilizing a Modified Sonntag Loop-Suture Graft With Posterior C1–2 Fixation
Neurospine. 2020;17(3):659-665.   Published online February 2, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Novel Technique for C1–2 Interlaminar Arthrodesis Utilizing a Modified Sonntag Loop-Suture Graft With Posterior C1–2 Fixation
Neurospine. 2020;17(3):659-665.   Published online February 2, 2020
Close
Objective
Conventional techniques for atlantoaxial fixation and fusion typically pass cables or wires underneath C1 lamina to secure the bone graft between the posterior elements of C1–2, which leads to complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and neurological injury. With the evolution of fixation hardware, we propose a novel C1–2 fixation technique that avoids the morbidity and complications associated with sublaminar cables and wires.
Methods
This technique entails wedging and anchoring a structural iliac crest graft between C1 and C2 for interlaminar arthrodesis and securing it using a 0-Prolene suture at the time of C1 lateral mass and C2 pars interarticularis screw fixation.
Results
We identified 32 patients who underwent surgery for atlantoaxial with our technique. A 60% improvement in pain-related disability from preoperative baseline was demonstrated by Neck Disability Index (p < 0.001). There were no neurologic deficits. Complications included 2 patients CSF leaks related to presenting trauma, 1 patient with surgical site infection, and 1 patient with transient dysphagia. The rate of radiographic atlantoaxial fusion was 96.8% at 6 months, with no evidence of instrumentation failure, graft dislodgement, or graft related complications.
Conclusion
We demonstrate a novel technique for C1–2 arthrodesis that is a safe and effective option for atlantoaxial fusion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Modified Sonntag Wiring as an Adjunct for C1-2 Fusion: A 3-Dimensional Operative Video
    Naser Ibrahim, Joshua Hanna, Edward Robinson, Pate Duddleston, James Kalyvas
    Operative Neurosurgery.2026; 30(1): 171.     CrossRef
  • The Results of Interfacetal Fusion Using Local Bone Combined With an Atlantoaxial Instrumentation
    Younggyu Oh, Byung-Jou Lee, Subum Lee, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park
    Operative Neurosurgery.2022; 22(5): 284.     CrossRef
  • 12,904 View
  • 331 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Predictive Analytics in Spine Oncology Research: First Steps, Limitations, and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):669-677.   Published online December 31, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Predictive Analytics in Spine Oncology Research: First Steps, Limitations, and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):669-677.   Published online December 31, 2019
Close
The potential of big data analytics to improve the quality of care for patients with spine tumors is significant. At this moment, the application of big data analytics to oncology and spine surgery is at a nascent stage. As such, efforts are underway to advance data-driven oncologic care, improve patient outcomes, and guide clinical decision making. This is both relevant and critical in the practice of spine oncology as clinical decision making is often made in isolation looking at select variables deemed relevant by the physician. With rapidly evolving therapeutics in surgery, radiation, interventional radiology, and oncology, there is a need to better develop decision-making algorithms utilizing the vast data available for each patient. The challenges and limitations inherent to big data analyses are presented with an eye towards future directions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Medicine for Head and Neck Cancer: Optimizing Prescriptions and Treatment Planning
    E. Karthikeyan, S. Sivaneswari
    Biomedical Materials & Devices.2026; 4(2): 1245.     CrossRef
  • Pain Management in Cancer Patients With Artificial Intelligence: Narrative Review
    Golnar Ghane, Raoofeh Karimi, Amir Mohammad Chekeni, Mahdi Darvishi, Reza Imani, Fatemeh Zahra Vafaeinezhad, Satish Rojekar
    Scientifica.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Profiling extracellular vesicles from cerebrospinal fluid for classification of intradural spinal tumors
    Amanda Salviano-Silva, Ines Stevic, Christian Mende, Rudolph Reimer, Cecile L. Maire, Marius M. Mader, Lasse Dührsen, Katrin Lamszus, Manfred Westphal, Sven O. Eicker, Franz L. Ricklefs
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of tumor microenvironment-based molecular subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases: refining conventional scoring systems
    Bing Liang, Annan Hu, Jian Zhou, Juan Li, Jian Dong
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Instrumentation and Implant Technology for Spine Oncology: A Focus on Carbon Fiber Technologies
    Iheanyi Amadi, Jean-Luc K. Kabangu, Adip G. Bhargav, Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan
    Surgeries.2024; 5(3): 499.     CrossRef
  • The intersection of race, ethnicity, and urbanicity on treatment paradigms and clinical outcomes for non-malignant primary tumors of the spine
    Brandon Bishop, Harrison Hockenberry, Jacob Sperber, Edwin Owolo, Cesar Baeta, Mackenzie Price, Corey Neff, Carol Kruchko, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Antionette J. Charles, Camryn Sciubba, Quinn T. Ostrom, Eli Johnson, C. Rory Goodwin
    Cancer Epidemiology.2024; 93: 102657.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Spinal Metastases Surgery Risk Stratification Tools in Breast Cancer by Molecular Subtype
    Julia B. Duvall, Elie Massaad, Layla Siraj, Ali Kiapour, Ian Connolly, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Theresa Williamson, Ganesh M. Shankar, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Mitchell S. Fourman, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgery.2023; 92(1): 83.     CrossRef
  • Can We Use Artificial Intelligence Cluster Analysis to Identify Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Spine at Highest Risk of Postoperative Adverse Events?
    Mitchell S. Fourman, Layla Siraj, Julia Duvall, Duncan C. Ramsey, Rafael De La Garza Ramos, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ian Connolly, Theresa Williamson, Ganesh M. Shankar, Andrew Schoenfeld, Reza Yassari, Elie Massaad, John H. Shin
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 174: e26.     CrossRef
  • Prediction and diagnosis of vertebral tumors on the Internet of Medical Things Platform using geometric rough propagation neural network
    H. Fouad, Ahmed M. Soliman, Azza S. Hassanein, Haytham Al-Feel
    Neural Computing and Applications.2022; 34(15): 13133.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances and new discoveries in the pipeline of the treatment of primary spinal tumors and spinal metastases: a scoping review of registered clinical studies from 2000 to 2020
    Julio C Furlan, Jefferson R Wilson, Eric M Massicotte, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings
    Neuro-Oncology.2022; 24(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning–derived body composition analysis
    Elie Massaad, Christopher P. Bridge, Ali Kiapour, Mitchell S. Fourman, Julia B. Duvall, Ian D. Connolly, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ganesh M. Shankar, Katherine P. Andriole, Michael Rosenthal, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Mark H. Bilsky, John H. Shin
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(2): 263.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models
    Babak Saravi, Frank Hassel, Sara Ülkümen, Alisia Zink, Veronika Shavlokhova, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Martin Boeker, Peter Obid, Gernot Lang
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 509.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Failure After Total En Bloc Spondylectomy and Salvage Surgery
    Shin Won Kwon, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Woon Tak Yuh, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang Hyun Lee, John M. Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 146.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI
    James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Sangeetha Baskar, Xi Zhen Low, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Ee Chin Teo, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Shuxun Lin, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Bala
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Model for Grading Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on Staging CT
    James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Tricia Kuah, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Xi Zhen Low, Amanda J. L. Cheng, Sterling Ellis Eide, Han Yang Ong, Faimee Erwan Muhamat Nor, Ahmed Mohamed Alsooreti, Mona I. AlMuhaish, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Ee
    Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3219.     CrossRef
  • Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment
    Bogdan Costăchescu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Bogdan Florin Iliescu, Marius Gabriel Dabija, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Daniel Rotariu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15680.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Postoperative Mortality After Metastatic Intraspinal Neoplasm Excision: Development of a Machine-Learning Approach
    Kevin J. DiSilvestro, Ashwin Veeramani, Christopher L. McDonald, Andrew S. Zhang, Eren O. Kuris, Wesley M. Durand, Eric M. Cohen, Alan H. Daniels
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 146: e917.     CrossRef
  • Is the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score Accurate and Reliable in Predicting Vertebral Compression Fractures for Spinal Metastasis? A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis
    Chang-Hyun Lee, Jae Taek Hong, Sun-Ho Lee, Seong Yi, Moon-Jun Sohn, Sung Hwan Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy and precision of the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for predicting vertebral compression fractures after radiotherapy in spinal metastases: a meta-analysis
    Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chi Heon Kim, Sung Bae Park, Ki-Jeong Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning in spine surgery: Predictive analytics, imaging applications and next steps
    Rushikesh S. Joshi, Darryl Lau, Christopher P. Ames
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2021; 33(2): 100878.     CrossRef
  • Inclusion of Frailty Improves Predictive Modeling for Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Management of Primary and Secondary Lumbar Spine Tumors
    Shane Shahrestani, Joshua Bakhsheshian, Samantha Solaru, Andy Ton, Alexander M. Ballatori, Xiao T. Chen, Rojine Ariani, Patrick Hsieh, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C. Wang
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 153: e454.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of cement augmentation with fenestrated pedicle screws for tumor-related spinal instability
    Elie Massaad, Myron Rolle, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ali Kiapour, Ganesh M. Shankar, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgical Focus.2021; 50(5): E12.     CrossRef
  • Performance assessment of the metastatic spinal tumor frailty index using machine learning algorithms: limitations and future directions
    Elie Massaad, Natalie Williams, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Shalin S. Patel, Mitchell S. Fourman, Ali Kiapour, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Ganesh M. Shankar, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgical Focus.2021; 50(5): E5.     CrossRef
  • Utility of prediction model score: a proposed tool to standardize the performance and generalizability of clinical predictive models based on systematic review
    Jeff Ehresman, Daniel Lubelski, Zach Pennington, Bethany Hung, A. Karim Ahmed, Tej D. Azad, Kurt Lehner, James Feghali, Zorica Buser, James Harrop, Jefferson Wilson, Shekar Kurpad, Zoher Ghogawala, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2021; 34(5): 779.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Sarcopenia as a Prognostic Factor for 90-Day and Overall Mortality in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery for Metastatic Tumors: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Elie Massaad, John H Shin
    Neurosurgery.2020; 87(5): E550.     CrossRef
  • 14,325 View
  • 237 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref