Objective To elucidate the clinical outcomes of craniocervical realignment surgery in patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) kyphosis accompanied by negative sagittal imbalance, and to identify radiological predictors associated with favorable outcomes.
Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 28 patients who underwent craniocervical realignment between 2014 and 2022 for CVJ kyphosis with accompanying negative sagittal imbalance. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale for neck pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Radiographic parameters included the C0–2 angle and the C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Favorable outcomes were defined as an improvement of more than 20 points in the NDI and a JOA recovery rate exceeding 50%. Multiple linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors and to determine optimal threshold values.
Results Significant improvements in both clinical outcomes and radiographic alignment were observed in association with craniocervical realignment surgery. Patients who achieved favorable outcomes exhibited greater postoperative changes in the C0–2 angle and the C2–7 SVA. Multivariate analysis identified changesm in the C0–2 angle (p=0.019) and C2–7 SVA (p=0.010) as independent predictors of NDI improvement, while age (p=0.033) and C2–7 SVA change (p=0.037) were independently associated with the JOA recovery rate. ROC curve analysis determined optimal cutoff values of ≥10.65° for C0–2 angle change and ≥19.2 mm for C2–7 SVA change, with corresponding area under the curve values of 0.872 and 0.802, respectively.
Conclusion Craniocervical realignment appears to be a viable surgical option for patients with CVJ kyphosis and negative sagittal imbalance. Postoperative changes in C0–2 angle and C2–7 SVA were found to be associated with favorable clinical and functional outcomes, suggesting their potential role as prognostic factors.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Predictive value of C0–C2 and C1–C2 angles for postoperative lower cervical alignment following posterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion: a retrospective single-center study Beiping OuYang, Hongyan Sun, Kaiwei Zhang, Li Zhang European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective Retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) is a nonneoplastic mass associated with atlantoaxial instability (AAI). This study compared ROP-positive and ROP-negative AAI patients and evaluated cystic versus granulation-type ROP regarding regression patterns and surgical outcomes.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 112 AAI patients who underwent pre- and postoperative imaging and clinical evaluations. Patients were classified as ROP-positive or ROP-negative, with ROP-positive cases further categorized as cystic or granulation-type. Imaging parameters—including atlantodental interval (ADI), ΔADI, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were compared along with regression time and postoperative outcomes.
Results Among 112 patients, 57 (50.9%) had ROP. The ROP-positive group was older (67.37±13.13 years vs. 56.90±15.15 years, p<0.001) and had lower ADI (5.63±2.77 mm vs. 6.99±2.33 mm, p=0.034), ΔADI (3.01±2.27 mm vs. 3.89±2.07 mm, p=0.006), and C2–7 ROM (30.78°±15.45° vs. 41.73°±16.58°, p<0.001). In ROP subgroups, the cystic group had greater C1–2 ROM (15.69°±6.34° vs. 10.00°±7.72°, p=0.013) and ADI (6.98±2.68 mm vs. 5.14±2.66 mm, p=0.042). Immediate postoperative ROP thickness remained greater in the cystic group (6.85±2.49 vs. 5.21±1.82 mm, p=0.042), while ROP thickness at 3 months and 1 year showed no significant differences. JOA recovery rates were similar.
Conclusion This study demonstrates that ROP-positive AAI patients exhibit distinct radiological characteristics, with reduced cervical mobility. Furthermore, cystic ROP shows delayed regression following posterior fusion. These findings underscore the importance of ROP subtypes in surgical planning, requiring closer monitoring and possibly earlier intervention.
Objective To evaluate C2 muscle preservation effect and the radiological and clinical outcomes after C2 recapping laminoplasty.
Methods Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent C2 recapping laminoplasty around C1–2 level were enrolled. To evaluate muscle preservation effect, the authors conducted a morphological measurement of extensor muscles between the operated and nonoperated side. Two surgeons measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) and semispinalis cervicis (SSC) muscle before and after surgery to determine atrophy rates (ARs). Additionally, we examined range of motion (ROM), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), neck visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score to assess potential changes in alignment and consequent clinical outcomes following posterior cervical surgery.
Results We measured the CSA of OCI and SSC before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Based on these measurements, the AR of the nonoperated SSC was 0.1% ± 8.5%, the AR of the operated OCI was 2.0% ± 7.2%, and the AR of the nonoperated OCI was -0.7% ± 5.1% at the 12 months after surgery. However, the AR of the operated side’s SSC was 11.2% ± 12.5%, which is a relatively higher value than other measurements. Despite the atrophic change of SSC on the operated side, there were no prominent changes observed in SVA, C0–2 ROM, and C2–7 ROM between preoperative and 12 months postoperative measurements, which were 11.8 ± 10.9 mm, 16.3° ± 5.9°, and 48.7° ± 7.7° preoperatively, and 14.1 ± 11.6 mm, 16.1° ± 7.2°, and 44.0° ± 10.3° at 12 months postoperative, respectively. Improvement was also noted in VAS, NDI, and JOA scores after surgery with JOA recovery rate of 77.3% ± 29.6%.
Conclusion C2 recapping laminoplasty could be a useful tool for addressing pathologies around the upper cervical spine, potentially mitigating muscle atrophy and reducing postoperative neck pain, while maintaining sagittal alignment and ROM.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Craniopharyngioma Quality of Life (C-QOL) Index: a preliminary disease-specific, patient-centered tool for assessing patient reported outcomes in adult craniopharyngioma patients Saket Myneni, Shaan Bhandarkar, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, A. Karim Ahmed, Foad Kazemi, João Paulo Almeida, Anand V. Germanwala, Andrew S. Venteicher, Nathan T. Zwagerman, Eric W. Wang, Garret Choby, Erin L. McKean, Carl H. Snyderman, Nicholas R. Rowan, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Two Posterior Minimally Invasive Approaches for Odontoid Fractures: Midline Nuchal Ligament Approach vs. Paramedian Muscle‐Splitting Approach Youcai Qiu, Liang Wang, Yijin Wang, Yang Li, Xuhua Lu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026; 18(1): 74. CrossRef
Techniques for Cervical Laminoplasty Newton Cho, Ankit I. Mehta, Aditya Vedantam, C. Rory Goodwin, Uzondu F. Agochukwu, Lukas Grassner, Aria Nouri, Bizhan Aarabi, Jefferson R. Wilson, Nathan Evaniew Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
C2-Involving Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL): Dome-like Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion Jun Jae Shin, Sun Joon Yoo, Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Yoon Ha Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The skull base chordoma patient reported outcome survey (sbCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in chordoma patients Saket Myneni, Linda Tang, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, A. Karim Ahmed, Foad Kazemi, Nicolas Dea, Nathan T. Zwagerman, Shirley Y. Su, Garret Choby, Eric W. Wang, Kristin J. Redmond, Erin L. McKean, Carl H. Snyderman, Nicholas R. Rowan, Debraj Mukherjee Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2025; 173(1): 157. CrossRef
The Spinal Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (spCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in spinal chordoma patients Saket Myneni, Linda Tang, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, Foad Kazemi, Ruiwen Xiong, Kristin J. Redmond, Mark H. Bilsky, Raphaële Charest-Morin, Daniel G. Tobert, Vikram Chakravarthy, Ganesh M. Shankar, Sheng-Fu L. Lo, John H. Shin, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Daniel Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2025; 175(2): 813. CrossRef
Objective Achieving successful fusion during spine surgery is dependent on rigid pedicle screw fixation. To assess fixation strength, the insertional torque can be measured during intraoperative screw fixation. This study aimed to explore the technical feasibility of measuring the insertional torque of a pedicle screw, while investigating its relationship with bone density.
Methods Thoraco-lumbar screw fixation fusion surgery was performed on 53 patients (mean age, 65.5 ± 9.8 years). The insertional torque of 284 screws was measured at the point passing through the pedicle using a calibrated torque wrench, with a specially designed connector to the spine screw system. The Hounsfield units (HU) value was determined by assessing the trabecular portion of the index vertebral body on sagittal computed tomography images. We analyzed the relationship between the measured insertional torque and the following bone strength parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) and HU of the vertebral body.
Results The mean insertion torque was 105.55 ± 58.08 N∙cm and T-score value (BMD) was -1.14 ± 1.49. Mean HU value was 136.37 ± 57.59. Screw insertion torque was positively correlated with BMD and HU in whole patients. However, in cases of osteopenia, all variables showed very weak correlations with insertional torque. In patients with osteoporosis, there was no statistically significant correlation between BMD and torque strength; HU showed a significant correlation.
Conclusion The insertional torque of screw fixation significantly correlated with bone density (BMD and HU). HU measurements showed greater clinical significance than did BMD values in patients with osteoporosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Femoral Bone Mineral Density Shows Stronger Correlation With Pedicle Screw Insertional Torque than Lumbar Bone Mineral Density or Hounsfield Units: A Retrospective in Vivo Study Yoji Ogura, Taisei Kato, Yuichiro Nishiyama, Keisuke Otsuka, Kenta Fujimura, Arya Varthi, Yoshihisa Suzuki Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
3D printing enabled biomechanical evaluation of a novel expandable wedge spacer for atlantoaxial reduction Chih-Chang Chang, Shao-Fu Huang, Rong-Chen Lin, Chun-Li Lin 3D Printing in Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Pre-Operative Bone Health in Elective Spine Surgery, From Risk Assessment to Optimization Strategies: A Narrative Review Mitchell K. Ng, Morgan Hitchner, Jonathan Dalton, Yulia Lee, William A. Green, Gregorio Baek, Joshua Mathew, Yasmine K. Eichbaum, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, Christopher K. Kepler Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Response to Letter to the Editor for “Femoral Bone Mineral Density Shows Stronger Correlation With Pedicle Screw Insertional Torque than Lumbar Bone Mineral Density or Hounsfield Units: A Retrospective in Vivo Study” Yoji Ogura Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A clinically applicable energy-based approach for evaluating bone strength Qiushi Bai, Jiahao Li, Chi Ma, Gengyu Cao, Yuanyi Wang, Da He, Sheng Lu, Qiang Yang, Yongchang Gao, Jingjing Tian, Kun Cheng, Yu Zhao Bone & Joint Research.2026; 15(5): 437. CrossRef
Design and Additive Manufacturing of a Rod Holding and Placement Instrument for Spinal Rehabilitative Surgery Motaz Hassan, Amanpreet Singh Wasir, Sumeer Lal, Ajay Mahajan Journal of Medical Devices.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of Lateral Perforation on the Biomechanical Stability of Thoracic Pedicle Screws Benno Bullert, Viktor Gupta, Mareike Schonhoff, Sebastian Jaeger, J. Philippe Kretzer, Paul A. Gruetzner, Sven Y. Vetter, Jula Gierse Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The Correlation Analysis Between the Pedicle Screw Placement Palpation and Torque Dongping Wang, Jiamin Yang, Haishan Li, Wei Lin, Shenglin Lei, Yuxian Chen, Yawen You, Chang Liu, Yongxian Li, Yuewei Lin, Huizhi Guo, Guoye Mo, Yongchao Tang, Kai Yuan, Bin Mai, Zhen Zhang, Shuncong Zhang World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123439. CrossRef
Visuohaptic Feedback in Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery for Pedicle Screw Placement Giuseppe Loggia, Fedan Avrumova, Darren R. Lebl Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(11): 3804. CrossRef
Ageing and BMI in Focus: Rethinking Risk Assessment for Vertebral Fragility and Pedicle Screw Loosening in Older Adults Jun Li, André Strahl, Beate Kunze, Stefan Krebs, Martin Stangenberg, Lennart Viezens, Patrick Strube, Marc Dreimann Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(15): 5296. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of 3D CT values for different lumbar pedicle screw trajectories Yuanpeng Yue, Ce Dong, Anhang Zhang, Zhenyu Wang Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Long Fiber Type Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Pedicle Screws Exhibit High Strength, Comparable to Titanium-Alloy Screws, and Are Resistant to Loosening Kohei Morita, Hiroki Ohashi, Kenji Tsuchida, Yasuhiro Furuta, Satoshi Tani, Kostadin Karagiozov, Yuichi Murayama Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 774. CrossRef
Analysis of the performance of different screws in the presence of bone density variability Zhirui Lu, Zhongshu Shan, Shuangshuang Ma, Wenxu Xu, Zhibin Liu, Dedong Gao Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2025; 239(11-12): 1121. CrossRef
Does Resistance Indicate Malposition? A Standardized Comparison of Pedicle Screw Placement Sascha Kurz, Benjamin Fischer, Janine Schultze, Florian Metzner, Toni Wendler, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde, Stefan Schleifenbaum Bioengineering.2025; 12(11): 1254. CrossRef
Objective This multicenter study compared radiological parameters and clinical outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical management and investigated treatment characteristics associated with the successful management of unstable atlas fractures.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture who underwent halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgical fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed using neck visual analogue scale and disability index. The radiological assessment included total lateral mass displacement (LMD) and the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI).
Results Thirty-two patients underwent surgical fixation and 21 received HVI (mean follow-up, 24.9 months). In the surgical fixation, but not in the HVI, LMD, and AADI showed statistically significant improvements at the last follow-up. The osseous healing rate and time-to-healing were 100% and 14.3 weeks with surgical fixation, compared with 71.43% and 20.0 weeks with HVI, respectively. Patients treated with HVI showed poorer neck pain and neck disability outcomes than those who received surgical treatment. LMD showed an association with osseous healing outcomes in nonoperative management. Clinical outcomes and osseous healing showed no significant differences according to Dickman’s classification of transverse atlantal ligament injuries.
Conclusion Surgical internal fixation had a higher fusion rate, shorter fracture healing time, more favorable clinical outcomes, and a more significant reduction in LMD and AADI compared to nonoperative management. The pitfalls of external immobilization are inadequate maintenance and a lower probability of reducing fractured lateral masses. Stabilization by surgical reduction with interconnected fixation proved to be a more practical management strategy than nonoperative treatment for unstable atlas fractures.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Motion preserving C1 ring lateral mass screw fixation with transverse rod for isolated unstable Jefferson fracture of atlas vertebra: a multicentric study Nathan Beucler, Anis Choucha, Kaissar Farah, Mikael Meyer, Arnaud Dagain, Stéphane Fuentes European Spine Journal.2026; 35(2): 936. CrossRef
Anatomical basis for a new method of atlas osteosynthesis in unstable C1 vertebra fractures V.N. Rashidov, I.Yu. Lisitskii, A.V. Lychagin, R.L. Kambiev, K.M. Kulakov, A.Yu. Zarov, A.L. Korkunov, V.G. Cherepanov, I.A. Vyazankin, E.Yu. Tselischeva Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery.2026; 90(2): 37. CrossRef
Clinical study of three internal fixation systems via transoral approach for motor function preservation in atlas fractures Yinghua He, Hu Chen, Hanmo Gu, Yansong Liu, Zhongbiao Liang, Xiangyang Ma, Jinahua Wang, Kai Zhang, Qiang Tu Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Original surgical technique of unstable atlas fracture osteosynthesis: case series analysis I. Yu. Lisitsky, V. N. Rashidov, A. V. Lychagin, A. Yu. Zarov, A. L. Korkunov, V. G. Cherepanov, I. A. Vyazankin, E. Yu. Tselishcheva Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika).2025; 22(1): 53. CrossRef
Perioperative outcomes and technical and patient-reported success of rigid occipitocervical fusions in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Alexander O. Aguirre, Mohamed A.R. Soliman, Isabelle G. Stockman, Gaitree R. Boojraj, Esteban Quiceno, Asham Khan, Kyungduk Rho, John Pollina, Jeffrey P. Mullin European Spine Journal.2025; 34(8): 3408. CrossRef
More postoperative complications and revision surgery after occipitocervical fusion than after atlantoaxial fusion: a retrospective multicenter cohort study Koji Uotani, Angel Oscar Paz Flores, Masato Tanaka, Shashank J Ekade, Shinya Arataki, Tadashi Komatsubara, Yoshiaki Oda, Kensuke Shinohara, Toshifumi Ozaki Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(3): 444. CrossRef
Craniocervical traumatic ligamentous injuries – AO spine type B injuries – Anatomy, biomechanics and clinical perspectives Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Klaus John Schnake, Richard J. Bransford, Harvinder Singh Chabbra, Sebastian F. Bigdon, Mohammad El-Sharkawi, Gregory D. Schroeder Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 71: 103223. CrossRef
Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Monoaxial versus Polyaxial Screw Constructs in C1 Jefferson Fracture Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Study Jae Taek Hong, Dong Hoon Kim, Jin Young Kim, Jung Woo Hur, Ho Jin Lee, Il Sup Kim World Neurosurgery.2025; 204: 124578. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Classification Systems Used for Traumatic Atlas (C1) Injuries Thiago Magalhães De Souza, Lucas Dos Santos Pavesi, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Direct C1 posterior arch screws for reduction and osteosynthesis in the treatment of Jefferson fracture Chang Kyu Park, Man Kyu Choi Acta Neurochirurgica.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Design of a novel lateral mass screw–plate system for the treatment of unstable atlas fractures: a finite element analysis He-Gang Niu, Jing-Jing Zhang, Yi-Zhu Yan, Cheng-Kun Zhao, Kun Yang, Yin-Shun Zhang Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures Mandi Cai, Yifeng Wu, Rencai Ma, Junlin Chen, Zexing Chen, Chenfu Deng, Xinzhao Huang, Xiangyang Ma, Xiaobao Zou Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 544. CrossRef
C1-ring оsteosynthesis as a functionally preserving operation for unstable atlas fractures I. V. Basankin, Abram Akopovich Giulzatyan, I. M. Magomedov, K. K. Takhmazyan, M. I. Tomina, S. B. Malakhov, A. A. Afaunov, V. A. Porkhanov Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika).2024; 21(3): 6. CrossRef
Commentary on “Surgical Versus Conservative Management for Treating Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Multicenter Study” Toshiyuki Takahashi Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 1026. CrossRef
Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) deformity is a challenging pathology that can result in progressive deformity, myelopathy, severe neck pain, and functional disability, such as difficulty swallowing. Surgical management of CVJ deformity is complex for anatomical reasons; given the discreet relationships involved in the surrounding neurovascular structures and intricate biochemical issues, access to this region is relatively difficult. Evaluation of the reducibility, CVJ alignment, and direction of the mechanical compression may determine surgical strategy. If CVJ deformity is reducible, posterior in situ fixation may be a viable solution. If the deformity is rigid and the C1–2 facet is fixed, osteotomy may be necessary to make the C1–2 facet joint reducible. C1–2 facet release with vertical reduction technique could be useful, especially when the C1–2 facet joint is the primary pathology of CVJ kyphotic deformity or basilar invagination. The indications for transoral surgery are becoming as narrow as a treatment for CVJ deformity. In this article, we will discuss CVJ alignment and various strategies for the management of CVJ deformity and possible ways to prevent complications and improve surgical outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Principles of systematization and formation of surgical strategies for craniovertebral region lesions V.V. Stepanenko, A.V. Trashin, V.A. Shamanin, K.S. Gordienko, Yu.A. Shulev, R.V. Khalepa, M.A. Kosimshoev, Yu.E. Kubetsky, D.A. Rzayev Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery.2026; 90(1): 21. CrossRef
C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw rod fixation for mobile atlantoaxial dislocation: An institutional experience and review of literature Abhishek Kumar, Dattaraj Sawarkar, Rajinder Laythaling, Rajeev Sharma, Amol Raheja, Satish Kumar Verma, Ramesh Dodamani, Manoj Phalak, Shashwat Mishra, Hitesh Gujjar, Amandeep Kumar, Vivek Tandon, Deepak Gupta, Deepak Aggarwal, Sarat Chandra, Shashank Sha Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice.2026; 0: 1. CrossRef
Basilar Invagination Diagnosis, Classification, and Radiology Onur Yaman, Mehmet Zileli, İdris Avci, Zan Chen, June Ho Lee, Geraldo Sá-Carneiro, Francesco Costa, Said Ait Ben Ali, Fernando Dantas, Joachim Oertel, Massimiliano Visocchi, Jutty Parthiban, Atul Goel, Ricardo Botelho, Oscar L. Alves Spine.2025; 50(11): E200. CrossRef
Supraglottic airway devices in neuroanesthesia practice: A narrative review Balaji Vaithialingam, Varadarajan Bhadrinarayan, Satish Rudrappa Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.2025; 41(3): 410. CrossRef
A novel image-based classification system for atlantoaxial deformity caused by mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA: an efficacy evaluation Qiu-Qi Zhang, Shangguan Wen-ji, Jia Song, Zhi-Hui Liang, Fu-Chao Zhou, Hai-Tao Liu, Jiang Shao, Yue-Hui Zhang Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Versatility of posterior fixation for craniovertebral junction anomalies: an observational analysis Ajay Sebastian Carvalho, Vijay Kumar Gupta, Subir De Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical correction of fixed cervicomedullary compression at the craniovertebral level in a patient in the late stage of rheumatoid arthritis (clinical observation and literature review) V. V. Stepanenko, V. A. Shamanin, A. V. Trashin, Yu. A. Shulev Russian journal of neurosurgery.2025; 27(2): 90. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors in Craniocervical Realignment for Craniovertebral Junction Kyphosis With Negative Cervical Imbalance: A Comprehensive Study Dong Hun Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Jin Young Kim, Kang Bin Koo, Dae Hee Lee, Jung Woo Hur, Ho Jin Lee, Il Sup Kim Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 725. CrossRef
Transoral Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: A Case Series of Three Rare Pathologies Morteza Sadeh, Hadeel Mansour, Javed Iqbal, Gabriel Gonzales-Portillo, John Souter, Sergey Neckrysh, Nicholas Callahan, Gursant Atwal Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor in Atlantoaxial Instability: Insights Into Presence, Subtypes, and Postoperative Regression Dong Hun Kim, Jung Woo Hur, Il Sup Kim, Ho Jin Lee, Jee Yong Kim, Jung Jae Lee, Jong Bum Lee, Jae Taek Hong Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 784. CrossRef
Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Monoaxial versus Polyaxial Screw Constructs in C1 Jefferson Fracture Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Study Jae Taek Hong, Dong Hoon Kim, Jin Young Kim, Jung Woo Hur, Ho Jin Lee, Il Sup Kim World Neurosurgery.2025; 204: 124578. CrossRef
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in C2 Recapping Laminoplasty for the Pathologies in the Upper Cervical Spine Dong Hun Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Jung Woo Hur, Il Sup Kim, Ho Jin Lee, Jong Beom Lee Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 565. CrossRef
Craniovertebral Junction Deformity Diagnosed by Computed Tomography: A Case Report Anjali Kumari, Gaurav V Mishra, Pratapsingh Parihar, Shivali V Kashikar, Sakshi S Dudhe, Rakshanda Agrawal, Paritosh N Bhangale Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The endoscopic transnasal approach to the lesions of the craniocervical junction: two case reports Baraa Dabboucy, Wissem Lahiani, Damien Bresson, Nouman Aldahak Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2023; 40(1): 96. CrossRef
Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor Xiang Yin, Keyu Luo, Yufei Jin, Yaoyao Liu, Yinbo Wang, Mingyong Liu, Peng Liu Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(3): 819. CrossRef
Investigating the vision-based intervertebral motion estimation of the Cadaver’s craniovertebral junction Mohammad Zubair, Sachin Kansal, Sudipto Mukherjee Robotica.2023; 41(10): 2907. CrossRef
The Optimal Time between Embolization and Surgery for Hypervascular Spinal Metastatic Tumors : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Woon Tak Yuh, Junghoon Han, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim, Hyun-Seung Kang, Chun Kee Chung Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2023; 66(4): 438. CrossRef
Novelties for increased safety in cranio-vertebral surgery: a review Enrico Tessitore, Ciro Mastantuoni, Ivan Cabrilo, Claudio Schonauer Acta Neurochirurgica.2023; 165(10): 3027. CrossRef
Head Fixation in Head Frame in Surgeries of Unstable Craniovertebral Junction through Midline Posterior Approach Deepak Kumar Jha, Ashutosh Jha, Mayank Garg, Jaskaran Singh Gosal, Mohit Agrawal, Raghavendra Kumar Sharma, Pushpinder Singh Khera Journal of Spinal Surgery.2023; 10(4): 152. CrossRef
Vision-based pose estimation of craniocervical region: experimental setup and saw bone-based study Mohammad Zubair, Sachin Kansal, Sudipto Mukherjee Robotica.2022; 40(6): 2031. CrossRef
Ideal entry point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination patients with high-riding vertebral artery based on 3D computed tomography Lu-Ping Zhou, Ren-Jie Zhang, Zhen-Fei Jiang, Er-Xu Tao, Jin Shang, Cai-Liang Shen The Spine Journal.2022; 22(8): 1281. CrossRef
Posterior Surgery in the Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Deformity with Torticollis Jinpeng Du, Xiangcheng Gao, Yunfei Huang, Xiaobin Yang, Bolong Zheng, Zhongkai Liu, Hua Hui, Lin Gao, Jiayuan Wu, Zhigang Zhao, Baorong He, Liang Yan, Dingjun Hao Orthopaedic Surgery.2022; 14(10): 2418. CrossRef
Evaluation of Cervicomedullary Compression Around the Craniovertebral Junction: Commentary on “Measurement of Deformity at the Craniovertebral Junction: Correlation of Triangular Area and Myelopathy” Jae Taek Hong Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 896. CrossRef
Measurement of Deformity at the Craniovertebral Junction: Correlation of Triangular Area and Myelopathy Chih-Chang Chang, Jau-Ching Wu, Chin-Chu Ko, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Yi-Hsuan Kuo, Chao-Hung Kuo, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Wen-Cheng Huang Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 889. CrossRef
Jae Taek Hong, Heiko Koller, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Wen Yuan, Asdrubal Falavigna, Ho Jin Lee, Jong Beom Lee, Jean-Charles Le Huec, Jong Hyuk Park, Il Sup Kim
Neurospine 2020;17(3):505-512. Published online September 30, 2020
Although cervical spinal deformity (CSD) can have a profoundly negative impact on an individual’s quality of life and there have been many advances in surgical treatment of CSD in recent years, there exists no comprehensive classification system of surgical treatment that categorizes anterior and posterior surgery separately according to the grade of surgery. The objective of this study is to introduce the new classification system of various surgical treatments for CSD. We developed a new classification system (SOF system) for CSD surgery that describes the sequence of surgical approach (S), the grade of osteotomy (O), and the information of fixation (F) using alphanumeric codes. This new classification system can provide a consistent description of the various osteotomies performed in CSD surgery. Especially, regarding research, there has been a clear benefit to this classification. Having a standardized classification that allows for common frame for cervical deformity correction surgery, communication between surgeons and the evaluation of the CSD surgeries make it possible to conduct global comparative research about surgical outcome.
Jae Keun Oh, Jae Taek Hong, Dong Ho Kang, Sang-Woo Kim, Seok Won Kim, Young Jin Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Jun Jae Shin, Seong Yi, Jung Kil Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Chang-Hyun Lee, Ho Jin Lee, Hyoung-Joon Chun, Dae-Chul Cho, Yong Eun Cho, Yong Jun Jin, Kyung-Chul Choi, In Ho Han, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jung-Woo Hur, Ki-Jeong Kim
Neurospine 2019;16(3):558-562. Published online September 30, 2019
Objective C5 palsy is a severe complication after cervical spine surgery, the pathophysiology of which remains unclear. This multicenter study investigated the incidence of C5 palsy following cervical spine surgery in Korea.
Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 21 centers from the Korean Cervical Spine Study Group. The inclusion criteria were cervical spine surgery patients between 2012 and 2016, excluding cases of neck surgery. In patients with C5 palsy, the operative methods, disease category, onset time of C5 palsy, recovery time, C5 manual muscle testing (MMT) grade, and post-C5 palsy management were analyzed.
Results We collected 15,097 cervical spine surgery cases from 21 centers. C5 palsy occurred in 88 cases (0.58%). C5 palsy was more common in male patients (p=0.019) and after posterior approach procedures (p<0.001). C5 palsy usually occurred within 3 days after surgery (77 of 88, 87.5%) and most C5 palsy patients recovered within 6 months (51 of 88, 57.95%). Thirty C5 palsy patients (34.09%) had motor weakness, with an MMT grade≤2. Only four C5 palsy patients (4.5%) did not recover during follow-up. Posterior cervical foraminotomy was performed in 7 cases (7.95%), and steroids were used in 56 cases (63.63%). Twenty-six cases (29.55%) underwent close observation only.
Conclusion The overall incidence of C5 palsy was relatively low (0.58%). C5 palsy was more common after posterior cervical surgery and in male patients. C5 palsy usually developed within 3 days after surgery, and more than half of patients with C5 palsy recovered within 6 months.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Complications Following Cervical Spine Surgery Narihito Nagoshi, Junichi Yamane, Toshiki Okubo, Yosuke Horiuchi, Yasuhiro Kamata, Norihiro Isogai, Hitoshi Kono, Yoshiomi Kobayashi, Reo Shibata, Takahito Iga, Kazuki Takeda, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(6): 2671. CrossRef
What is the probability of recovery of C5 palsy after cervical spine surgery over time? A systematic review and meta-analysis Nienke A. Krijnen, Alexander J. Comerci, Christopher J. Fedor, Hamid Alahmari, James C. Bayley, Teun Teunis The Spine Journal.2026; 26(5): 853. CrossRef
Risk factors for C5 nerve root palsy following surgery for cervical degenerative disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis Mingzhu Huang, Kang Chen, Yujin Zhang, Lanxin Zhang, Changyu Liu, Xuan Liu, Xiangzhuo Liu, Ningyuan Li, Ying Lu, Mingjiang Luo, Zhihong Xiao, Liquan Li Neurosurgical Review.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
C5 Palsy After Cervical Decompression: A 10-Year Single-Institution Study Highlighting Early Onset, High Bilaterality, and Poor Recovery Sargunan B, Vishnu Prasath, Karthik Sudhakar, Thomas John Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
De novo C5 palsy in the absence of prior surgery: a retrospective study of surgical management and outcomes in the United States Wesley Manz, Sameer Khawaja, Corey Spencer, Dale Segal, Zach Grabel, Doug Weinberg, Eli Garrard, John Rhee Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(1): 34. CrossRef
Preoperative Imaging Predictors of Postoperative C5 Palsy Jonathan Dalton, Rachel Huang, Michael Carter, Robert J. Oris, Joydeep Baidya, Joshua Mathew, Rajkishen Narayanan, Andrew Kim, Sebastian Fras, Jonah Blas, Anthony LaBarbiera, Matthew Ruiz, Evgeniy Uvarov, Keyur Patel, Mark F. Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose A. Spine.2026; 51(10): 692. CrossRef
C4/5 Facetectomy Is Associated With Improved Recovery of C5 Palsy in Severe Foraminal Stenosis After Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Yusuke Nakamura, Sohei Murata, Taisuke Yabe, Hiromu Ito Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Increased Change in Cervical Lordosis Is Associated With Decreased Rate of Recovery in Patients With C5 Palsy Joseph N. Frazzetta, Nathan Pecoraro, Ignacio Jusue-Torres, Paul M. Arnold, Ryan Hofler, G. Alexander Jones, Russ Nockels Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(3): E152. CrossRef
Phrenic Nerve Palsy After Posterior Cervical Fusion Thomas Falconiero, Anthony Viola, Mark LaGreca, Caleb M. Yeung, Jeffrey Rihn Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(5): 217. CrossRef
Biceps involvement and degree of motor deficit at diagnosis are independently predictive of timing of postoperative C5 palsy recovery Gregory Toci, Jonathan Dalton, Rachel Huang, Michael Carter, Robert J. Oris, Rajkishen Narayanan, Andrew Kim, Julienne Jeong, Brady Stallman, Kenneth McCall, Mark F. Kurd, Ian D. Kaye, Barrett I. Woods, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Jose A. Canseco, Alan S. Hilibrand, The Spine Journal.2025; 25(11): 2441. CrossRef
Cord-lamina angle and foraminal diameter as key predictors of C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery Wenchao Zhou, Baifeng Sun, Zichuan Wu, Aochen Xu, Hanlin Song, Xuhong Zhang, Junbin Liu, Junzhe Sheng, Yang Liu Open Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
C5 Nerve Palsy After Posterior Instrumentation and Decompression in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature Konstantinos Zygogiannis, Pavlos Gerasimidis, Spyridon Komaitis, Savvas Moschos, Georgios C Thivaios, Aikaterini Tsatsaragkou, Dimitrios Koulalis Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Transient C5 Palsy After Full‐Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy João Paulo Machado Bergamaschi, Ariel Falbel Lugão, Rangel Roberto de Assis, Kelsen de Oliveira Teixeira, Fernando Flores de Araújo, Thiago Queiroz Soares, Gustavo Vitelli Depieri, Álvaro Dowling, Robson Cruz de Oliveira, Fernanda Wirth, Fábio da Silva Fo Case Reports in Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Recovery patterns from C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion, posterior cervical decompression and fusion, and laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of 748 C5 palsy cases Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Guna Pratheep Kalanchiam, Akilan Chinnappan, Sathish Muthu Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(6): 1059. CrossRef
Contralateral C7 nerve root transfer for post-stroke prolonged flaccid paralysis — Two cases report Shuai Zhu, Feng-Chi Sun, Xiang-Meng Su, Si-Wei Xu, Jun-Tao Feng, Hua-Wei Yin, Wen-Dong Xu, Yun-Dong Shen Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation.2025; 44(5): 102261. CrossRef
Flexion K-Line Status Predicts Surgical Strategy in Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Multicenter Comparison of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy With Fusion Jun Jae Shin, Sun Joon Yoo, Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Yoon Ha Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 937. CrossRef
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion and Posterior Laminoplasty for Four-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Liang Shi, Tao Ding, Fang Wang, Chengcong Wu Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.2024; 85(04): 331. CrossRef
A rare case of phrenic nerve palsy after cervical spine surgery Shubham Sanjay Lodha, Akash Vishnu Mane, Mandar Borde, K V Menon Indian Spine Journal.2024; 7(1): 100. CrossRef
A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade Vikramaditya Rai, Vipin Sharma, Mukesh Kumar, Lokesh Thakur Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(2): 141. CrossRef
Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis Seungyoon Paik, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, John Min Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Thamer Hamdan PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281926. CrossRef
Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy Yong-Ho Lee, Mahmoud Abdou, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, You-Gun Won, Tae-Jin Lee, Byung-Ho Lee Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(6): 2227. CrossRef
Clinical Spectrum of Postsurgical Parsonage-Turner Syndrome: A Perspective From an Electrodiagnostic Laboratory Vasudeva G Iyer, Lisa B Shields, Yi Ping Zhang, Christopher B Shields Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Bilateral phrenic nerve palsy after posterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: a rare event after surgery Glenn A. Gonzalez, Jingya Miao, Guilherme Porto, James Harrop Spinal Cord Series and Cases.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Progress of C5 Nerve Root Palsy after Open-Door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty ·阿不力肯 阿不都沙拉木 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(10): 16813. CrossRef
Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage by Pump-Regulated Volumetric Continuous Lumbar Drainage Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Sun Woo Jang, Sang Hyub Lee, Hong Kyung Shin, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1421. CrossRef
A Novel Method of Making Hinges Using a Newly Designed Sharp Rongeur to Enhance Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in French‐Door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty Ningning Chen, Lanzhe Yu, Xizhe Liu, Guoliang Chen, Yanrun Li, Xuenong Zou, Dacheng He, Jiaming Yang, Shangbin Cui, Le Wang, Shaoyu Liu, Fuxin Wei Orthopaedic Surgery.2022; 14(12): 3349. CrossRef
Defining postoperative C5 palsy and recovery: a systematic review Nachiket Deshpande, Amro M. Stino, Brandon W. Smith, Ann A. Little, Lynda J. S. Yang, Paul Park, Yamaan S. Saadeh Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; : 1. CrossRef
Use of electromyography to predict likelihood of recovery following C5 palsy after posterior cervical spine surgery Daniel Lubelski, Zach Pennington, Ryan F. Planchard, Ahmet Hoke, Nicholas Theodore, Daniel M. Sciubba, Allan J. Belzberg The Spine Journal.2021; 21(3): 387. CrossRef
A modified cutting line in the single-door cervical laminoplasty via a computed tomography-based morphological study of the subaxial cervical spine Guoliang Chen, Weicheng Huang, Mengxian Jia, Jiajin Lin, Yadong Sheng, Chaowei Lin, Kelun Huang, Honglin Teng Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2021; 200: 106384. CrossRef
A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system Jae Taek Hong, Heiko Koller, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Wen Yuan, Asdrubal Falavigna, Ho Jin Lee, Jong Beom Lee, Jean-Charles Le Huec, Jong-Hyeok Park, Il Sup Kim European Spine Journal.2021; 30(6): 1670. CrossRef
C5 palsy after cervical laminectomy: natural history in a 10-year series Ryan C. Hofler, Joseph Frazzetta, Jehad Zakaria, Amany Aziz, William Adams, G. Alexander Jones The Spine Journal.2021; 21(9): 1473. CrossRef
Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty Su Hun Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Geun Sung Song, Jun Seok Lee, Sang Weon Lee Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(5): 677. CrossRef
Phrenic nerve palsy after cervical laminectomy and fusion Andrew S. Moon, Jeffrey M. Pearson, Jason L. Pittman North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2020; 4: 100022. CrossRef
First
Prev
