Objective This study compared the efficacy of posterior pedicle screw fixation with 5.5-mm rods (PPSF5.5) with anterior corpectomy (AC) for metastatic cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) tumors.
Methods This retrospective analysis included patients with CTJ tumors who underwent PPSF5.5 or AC from January 2000 to December 2023. Data collected included demographics, surgical details, clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale scores for neck or back pain, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scale score, McCormick scale, Nurick grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score), radiologic results (cervical segmental Cobb angle), and surgical complications (instrumentation failure, tumor regrowth, and wound infection).
Results The AC group showed a tendency for short-level fusion. Patients in this group had tumors primarily located near C7 and generally confined to the vertebral body. AC was associated with more significant postoperative kyphotic changes in the index vertebra during follow-up than PPSF5.5. Moreover, AC was associated with a higher incidence of instrumentation failure, necessitating revision surgeries. Conversely, patients in the PPSF5.5 group tended to require revision surgery due to tumor regrowth.
Conclusion For CTJ metastatic tumors, PPSF5.5 provides superior resistance to forward bending and collapse prevention and minimizes instrumentation failure rate compared to AC. Moreover, AC may reduce the risk of tumor recurrence, but this approach is recommended only if the tumor is confined to the vertebral body and located at the upper level of the CTJ.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The efficacy of 5.5-mm diameter rods combined with cervical pedicle screws for the treatment of challenging spinal disease in cervicothoracic junction: Is it a game-changer? Younggyu Oh, Subum Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Danbi Park, Chongman Kim, Sun Woo Jang, Jin Hoon Park Medicine.2025; 104(36): e44369. CrossRef
Objective We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF).
Methods Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan.
Results Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001).
Conclusion Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation.
Sang Hyub Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Hong Kyung Shin, Jeoung Hee Kim, Danbi Park, Chang-Min Ha, Sun-Ho Lee, Dong Ho Kang, Young Hyun Cho, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park
Neurospine 2024;21(1):293-302. Published online January 31, 2024
Objective Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed.
Results A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–1.79; p = 0.336).
Conclusion SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Preoperative 3D surgical planning using Mimics significantly decreased the rate of internal fixation in cervical dumbbell tumor resection and improved the postoperative outcome: a single-center retrospective study Hui Wang, Zhiwen Qin, Hailin Lyu, Lu Gao, Ke Zhang European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative radiotherapy combined with surgery versus surgery alone for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a meta-analysis Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for spinal cord surgery Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sum Kim, Young-Rak Kim, Kyung-Tae Kim, Ji-hoon Kim, John M. Rhee, Woo-Young Jo, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park, Chi Heon Kim, Barry Kweh PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0305694. CrossRef
A Complete Facet Resection and Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Enhances Both Gross Total Resection and Motion Preservation for the Cervical Spinal Dumbbell Tumor Sungsoo Bae, Dae-Jean Jo, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Jinuk Kim, Chongman Kim, Jin Hoon Park World Neurosurgery.2024; 192: e486. CrossRef
Objective Romosozumab is increasingly employed to manage osteoporosis. However, no studies have analyzed its effects on recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of romosozumab compared with teriparatide in managing OVCFs.
Methods The electronic medical records of postmenopausal patients with recent OVCFs who were administered romosozumab or teriparatide for one year from March 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the 2 groups for demographics, radiological outcomes (compression ratio, Cobb angle, and bone mineral density [BMD]), and clinical outcomes (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] for back pain).
Results Fifty-five patients with OVCFs, 32 patients treated with romosozumab and 23 with teriparatide, were included in this study. The change of BMD (g/cm2) values was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.04 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.00 ± 0.08) in the femur total. Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, the change of BMD (g/cm2) values in the lumbar spine was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.12 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.07 ± 0.06) in the lumbar spine. The decrease in NRS was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the romosozumab (6.6 ± 2.0) than in the teriparatide group (5.5 ± 2.1). However, there was no significant difference in radiologic outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion Our findings suggest that romosozumab may be more effective than teriparatide in treating OVCFs in postmenopausal females, particularly in improving BMD and reducing back pain as measured by NRS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Romosozumab mitigates progression from radiological to symptomatic adjacent-level fractures compared to teriparatide Wei-Han Kao, Yi-Shan Yang, Chen-Ling Lan, Wen-Cheng Lo, Yung-Hsiao Chiang, Jiann-Her Lin Osteoporosis International.2026; 37(2): 491. CrossRef
Comparative Radiologic Outcomes of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Jun-Seok Lee, Geon-U Kim, Ho-Young Jung, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Sangjun Park, Young-Yul Kim, Hyung-Youl Park Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(6): 2349. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Posterior Long-Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Study Jong-Hwan Hong, Jong-Hoon Jung, Ji-Ho Jung, Moon-Soo Han, Jung-Kil Lee World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123433. CrossRef
Off-label use of teriparatide for the treatment of a vertebral burst fracture in a young patient: A case report and literature review Tiziano Villa, Vincenzo Zottola, Carlo Mariani, Alberto Borgonovo, Luciano Redenti Trauma Case Reports.2025; 55: 101127. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes Hyun Woong Mun, Jong Joo Lee, Hyun Chul Shin, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Woo Kim, Jae Keun Oh Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 69. CrossRef
A Commentary on “Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes” Toshihiko Inui Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 78. CrossRef
Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporotic Drugs in Preventing Periprosthetic Bone Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta‐Analysis Yi Tang, Zhaokai Jin, Yichen Lu, Lei Chen, Shuaijie Lv, Taotao Xu, Peijian Tong, Guoqian Chen Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(10): 2344. CrossRef
Commentary on “Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs” Chao-Hung Kuo Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 44. CrossRef
Comparison of osteoanabolic agents (teriparatide and romosozumab) with bisphosphonates in prevention of subsequent vertebral fractures in patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral fracture for 12 months: An observational cohort study Keishi Maruo, Tomoyuki Kusukawa, Masakazu Toi, Tetsuto Yamaura, Masaru Hatano, Hayato Oishi, Kazuma Nagao, Fumihiro Arizumi, Kazuya Kishima, Norichika Yoshie, Toshiya Tachibana Bone Reports.2024; 21: 101762. CrossRef
Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacral Fracture Following Lumbosacral Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years: A Case–Control Study Sang Hyub Lee, Dong-Hwan Kim, Jin Hoon Park, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Dong Ho Kang World Neurosurgery.2024; 191: e633. CrossRef
Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major concern related to anterior cervical decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We propose a management algorithm for CSF leakage following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL involving the use of pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL and were managed with the proposed algorithm between March 2018 and July 2022. The proposed management algorithm for CSF leakage by pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage was as follows. On exposure of the arachnoid membrane with or without CSF leakage, a dural sealant patch was applied to manage the dural defect. In case of persistent CSF leakage despite application of the dural sealant patch, patients underwent pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage.
Results Fifty-one patients were included in the study. CSF leakage occurred in 14 patients. Of these 14 patients, 9 patients underwent lumbar drain insertion according to the proposed management algorithm. Successful resolution of CSF leakage was observed in 8 of the 9 patients who underwent lumbar drainage. All patients were encouraged to ambulate without concern of CSF overdrainage due to gravity, because it could be avoided with pump-regulated volumetric continuous CSF drainage. Therefore, complications associated with absolute bed rest or CSF overdrainage were not observed.
Conclusion The proposed management algorithm with pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage showed safety and efficacy for management of CSF leakage following anterior decompression and fusion for OPLL.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhanced indirect sealing of cerebrospinal fluid leaks in anterior cervical surgery using plate mechanical pressure Dong Liu, Leisheng Wang, Xiaoguang Fan Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2026; 19(1): 102196. CrossRef
Delayed myelopathy caused by cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst following decompression for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum: a case report and literature review Shuxin Zheng, Jianzhi Wang, Junhu Li, Linnan Wang, Lei Wang, Yueming Song BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
External lumbar drain for fistula leakage in posterior fossa and spinal surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis Luciano Falcão, João Pedro Fernandes Gonçalves, Maianna Sancho do Lago, Maria Clara Nery Cardoso, Judson Carlos S. N. Júnior, Lucas Piason, Jean G. de Oliveira, José Carlos Esteves Veiga Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Dural Tear and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Evolving Repair Techniques Jae Jun Yang, Jiwon Park, Jong-Beom Park, Suo Kim Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(23): 8478. CrossRef
Review/Perspective: Incidence and treatment of CSF leaks/dural tears (DT) occurring during anterior cervical surgery Nancy E. Epstein, Marc A. Agulnick Surgical Neurology International.2024; 15: 401. CrossRef
The drainage volume control by elevation of drainage height versus head down tilt in supine position for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery Ping Dong, Jing Huang, Xu Deng, Hongli Yang, Chunmei Luo BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Hong Kyung Shin, Jin Hoon Park, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Yong-Jae Cho, for the Korean Spinal Deformity Society (KSDS)
Neurospine 2023;20(4):1469-1476. Published online December 31, 2023
Objective Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI.
Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted.
Results Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01).
Conclusion IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A biomechanical study comparing combined S1AI and S3AI trajectories to other pelvic fixation techniques: A finite element analysis William Sheppard, Arpan A. Patel, Colin Rhoads, Landon Reading, Theodore Rudic, Joshua Wiener, Matthew Magro, Lauren M. Boden, Thomas Olson, Jason Savage, Michael Steinmetz, Edin Nevzati, Alexander Spiessberger Clinical Biomechanics.2026; 131: 106712. CrossRef
Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality of Meta-Analyses Comparing Sacral 2 Alar–Iliac Fixation with Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Umbrella Review with Emphasis on Methodological Limitations Ali Haider Bangash, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell S. Fourman, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jaime A. Gomez, C. Rory Goodwin, Peter G. Passias, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 753. CrossRef
Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes Hanyu Qiu, Dhruvish Patel, Moriah Thompson, Piper Tingleaf, Kishore Balasubramanian, Peter G. Passias, Luis M. Tumialan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Nitin Agrawal, Ali K. Ozturk, Hakeem J. Shakir, John F. Burke, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith, Andrew Jea, Angela E. Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of Porous Pelvic Fixation Implants in Multilevel Spine Fusion Surgery John Caridi, Richard Menger, Christopher Martin, Alexander Lemons, Isador Lieberman, Jeffrey Mullin, Jonathan Sembrano, Khalid Odeh, Evalina Burger, Taylor Lawson, Christopher J. Kleck Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Asymmetric Safety Corridors for Free-Hand S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Placement: Quantifying Direction-Specific Tolerance Around Patient-Specific Optimal Trajectories Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Sun Joon Yoo, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Jeong Yoon Park, Jun Jae Shin, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Kyung Hyun Kim Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(12): 4495. CrossRef
S2AI and iliac screw prominence and removal for symptomatic prominence: a systematic review Rafael Garcia, Kari Odland, Paul Lender, David Polly European Spine Journal.2025; 34(4): 1398. CrossRef
S2AI vs. iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Sleiman Haddad, Riccardo Raganato, Yann Philippe Charles, Franciso Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Ahmet Alanay, Ferran Pellise, Javier Pizones European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Screw Loosening in S2 Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity Yasuhiro Nagatani, Hiroaki Nakashima, Tokumi Kanemura, Mikito Tsushima, Hiroyuki Tomita, Kazuaki Morishita, Hiroki Oyama, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yukihito Ode, Yuya Okada, Shiro Imagama Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(6): 1881. CrossRef
A biomechanical study on bilateral SAI annular fixation in the treatment of unilateral Denis Ⅱ sacral fractures Peishuai Zhao, Chengfei Peng, Honghu Lin, Wuqing Wei, Weiyi Pang, Chaoyong Bei Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111221. CrossRef
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Spinopelvic Fixation - What are the Key Items to Understand Performance? Robert Ravinsky, Stephen Lewis, Charles Fisher, David Polly Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(6): 2855. CrossRef
Low rates of pain requiring sacroiliac joint fusion after countersunk iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation Rahul Kishore Chaliparambil, Mykhaylo Krushelnytskyy, Rishi Jain, Mehul Mittal, Amr Alwakeal, Muhammad T. Hassan, Nishanth S. Sadagopan, Pavlos Texakalidis, Najib El Tecle, Nader S. Dahdaleh, Tyler Koski Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(3): 284. CrossRef
Comparative efficacy of S2-alar-iliac versus iliac screw techniques in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications Amit Saraf, Sanjeev Kumar Jain, Sonika Sharma Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(5): 847. CrossRef
What’s New in Spine Surgery Melvin D. Helgeson, Alfred J. Pisano, Donald R. Fredericks, Scott C. Wagner Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2024; 106(12): 1035. CrossRef
Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes Anouar Bourghli, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100516. CrossRef
Objective Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in debilitating motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction. As a treatment option, therapeutic hypothermia has been researched to inadequate pharmaceutical treatment, except for methylprednisolone. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed to clarify the effect of hypothermia in acute SCI on neurological outcomes.
Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until June 30, 2022. The proportion of cases with improved neurological status after hypothermia in acute SCI were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of hypothermia and injury level were conducted.
Results Eight studies with a total of 103 patients were included. Hypothermia in acute SCI improved neurological function by 55.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.4%–72.1%). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled proportion of cases showing neurological improvement was higher with systemic hypothermia (70.9%) (95% CI, 14.9%–100%) than with local hypothermia (52.5%) (95% CI, 40.4%–64.5%), although the subgroup difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). Another subgroup analysis revealed that the proportion of cases with neurological improvement did not differ statistically between the cervical spine (61.4%) (95% CI, 42.2%–80.6%) and thoracic spine injury groups (59.4%) (95% CI, 34.8%–84.0%) (p = 0.90).
Conclusion This meta-analysis identified that more than 50% of patients showed neurological improvement after hypothermia following acute SCI in general. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with larger sample size is necessary to validate the findings further.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Mechanisms and Applications of Conductive Biomaterials in Spinal Cord Injury Repair Bin Zhao, Zhonghan Wang, Tong Yu, Xiangran Cui, Jinbo Zhang, Quezhu Danzeng, Wenjie Wang, Yi Shen, Chenhao Ma, Yaolin Zhao, Jianhang Jiao, Minfei Wu Biomaterials Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
From neural stem cells to cell-free exosome nanotherapy: reprogramming the injured spinal cord microenvironment for regeneration Cheng Zhang, Xiaoyin Liu, Bolin Zhao, Jia Luo, Wenhui Liu, Yun Hao, Fuheng Hu, Siyi Li, Liyuan Jin, Wei Huang, Xiaohui Yu, Jianguo Xu, Jiaojiang He, Liangxue Zhou Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Current and emergent therapies targeting spinal cord injury Giovanni Grasso, Luigi Cusimano, Manfredi Noto, Rosario Maugeri, Domenico Gerardo Iacopino Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104243. CrossRef
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Review of the Literature Lori Zarmer, Maaz Khan, Glenn Islat, Hanan Alameddin, Maria Massey, Rabail Chaudhry Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(11): 3649. CrossRef
The future of artificial hibernation medicine Caiyun Liu, Haixin Yu, Zhengchao Li, Shulian Chen, Xiaoyin Li, Xuyi Chen, Bo Chen Neural Regeneration Research.2024; 19(1): 22. CrossRef
Clinical Assessment and Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury Christian Quinones, John Preston Wilson, Deepak Kumbhare, Bharat Guthikonda, Stanley Hoang Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5719. CrossRef
Co-Administration of Resolvin D1 and Peripheral Nerve-Derived Stem Cell Spheroids as a Therapeutic Strategy in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury Seung-Young Jeong, Hye-Lan Lee, SungWon Wee, HyeYeong Lee, GwangYong Hwang, SaeYeon Hwang, SolLip Yoon, Young-Il Yang, Inbo Han, Keung-Nyun Kim International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(13): 10971. CrossRef
Commentary on “Different Ways to Die: Cell Death Pathways and Their Association With Spinal Cord Injury” Jeffrey Luo, Joshua B. Stein, Ki-Bum Lee Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 449. CrossRef
Early surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: time is spine Ayesha Quddusi, Karlo M. Pedro, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Nader Hejrati, Michael G. Fehlings Acta Neurochirurgica.2023; 165(9): 2665. CrossRef
First
Prev
