Alexander F. Haddad, John F. Burke, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Andrew K. Chan, Michael M. Safaee, John J. Knightly, Rory R. Mayer, Brenton H. Pennicooke, Anthony M. Digiorgio, Philip R. Weinstein, Aaron J. Clark, Dean Chou, Sanjay S. Dhall
Neurospine 2021;18(2):292-302. Published online June 30, 2021
Objective The use of telemedicine has dramatically increased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many neurosurgeons are now using telemedicine technologies for preoperative evaluations and routine outpatient visits. Our goal was to standardize the telemedicine motor neurologic examination, summarize the evidence surrounding clinical use of telehealth technologies, and discuss financial and legal considerations.
Methods We identified a 12-member panel composed of spine surgeons, fellows, and senior residents at a single institution. We created an initial telehealth strength examination protocol based on published data and developed 10 agree/disagree statements summarizing the protocol. A blinded Delphi method was utilized to build consensus for each statement, defined as > 80% agreement and no significant disagreement using a 2-way binomial test (significance threshold of p < 0.05). Any statement that did not meet consensus was edited and iteratively resubmitted to the panel until consensus was achieved. In the final round, the panel was unblinded and the protocol was finalized.
Results After the first round, 4/10 statements failed to meet consensus ( < 80% agreement, and p = 0.031, p = 0.031, p = 0.003, and p = 0.031 statistical disagreement, respectively). The disagreement pertained to grading of strength of the upper (3/10 statements) and lower extremities (1/10 statement). The amended statements clarified strength grading, achieved consensus ( > 80% agreement, p > 0.05 disagreement), and were used to create the final telehealth strength examination protocol.
Conclusion The resulting protocol was used in our clinic to standardize the telehealth strength examination. This protocol, as well as our summary of telehealth clinical practice, should aid neurosurgical clinics in integrating telemedicine modalities into their practice.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Unlocking global neurosurgery: how telemedicine addresses unmet needs and future prospects — a scoping review Nicolas Melo Sierra, Erwin Hernando Hernández Rincón, Valeria Neira Bejarano, Kemel A. Ghotme Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2026; 152: 112121. CrossRef
The role of advocacy and policy in advancing global neurosurgery Toufik Abdul-Rahman, Sarah M. Badar, Sruthi Ranganathan, Aderinto Nicholas, Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Ogungbemi Evelyn Faith, Mrinmoy Kundu, Andrew Awuah Wireko, Anam Sayed Mushir Ali, Oday Atallah, Viktoriia Horbas, Tetiana P. Teslyk, Valentyna Bumeister Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(4): 2049. CrossRef
To Zoom or not to Zoom? A retrospective comparative study to assess the validity of video versus face-to-face consultations and examinations for diagnosing lower back pain in Wales Megan Havard, Ronan McKeogh, Abi Goodier, Gemma Johns, Sashin Ahuja Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(3): 415. CrossRef
A Delphi consensus to identify the key screening tests/questions for a digital neurological examination for epidemiological research Vasco Ribeiro Ferreira, Carol Brayne, Paolo Ragonese, Carlos Ketzoian, Marta Piccioli, Lorenzo Tinti, Carlo Casali, Cherubino di Lorenzo, Claudia Ramos, João Azevedo, Adriana Gomes, Roderick Stewart, Hein Haas, Stan Hoppenbrouwer, Esther Metting, Valentin Journal of Neurology.2024; 271(5): 2694. CrossRef
Feasibility and effectiveness of telehealth in the management of cervicothoracic and lumbar pain during the first six months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A case series George Rappard, Jake Harb, Caitlin Yi, Robb Russell Interventional Pain Medicine.2023; 2(3): 100260. CrossRef
Telehealth in PM&R: Past, present, and future in clinical practice and opportunities for translational research Adam S. Tenforde, Joshua J. Alexander, Marcalee Alexander, Thiru M. Annaswamy, Conley J. Carr, Philip Chang, Monique Díaz, Mary A. Iaccarino, Stephen B. Lewis, Carolyn Millett, Sindhu Pandit, Claudia P. Ramirez, Robert Rinaldi, Megan Roop, Chloe S. Slocum PM&R.2023; 15(9): 1156. CrossRef
Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos Tejas Subramanian, Kasra Araghi, Izzet Akosman, Olivia Tuma, Amier Hassan, Ali Lahooti, Anthony Pajak, Pratyush Shahi, Robert Merrill, Omri Maayan, Evan Sheha, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1443. CrossRef
Commentary: The Legal and Socioeconomic Considerations in Spine Telemedicine Mohamad Bydon, Giorgos D. Michalopoulos Neurosurgery.2022; 90(5): e125. CrossRef
Appropriate Telemedicine Utilization in Spine Surgery Sravisht Iyer, Patawut Bovonratwet, Dino Samartzis, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Howard S. An, Waleed Awwad, Scott L. Blumenthal, Jason P.Y. Cheung, Peter B. Derman, Mohammad El-Sharkawi, Brett A. Freedman, Roger Hartl, James D. Kang, Han Jo Kim, Philip K. Louie Spine.2022; 47(8): 583. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Outpatient Telemedicine Use in Neurosurgery Since the Start of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Jeffrey Z. Nie, Constantine L. Karras, Pavlos Texakalidis, S. Joy Trybula, Nader S. Dahdaleh World Neurosurgery.2022; 167: e1090. CrossRef
Patient satisfaction and cost savings analysis of the telemedicine program within a neuro-oncology department James K. C. Liu, Richard Kang, Arkady Bilenkin, Rachel Prorok, Junmin Whiting, Krupal B. Patel, Andre Beer-Furlan, Cristina Naso, Andrea Rogers, Xavier Baez Castro, Edwin Peguero, Sepideh Mokhtari, Nam Tran, Arnold Etame, Yolanda Pina, Philippe E. Spiess, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2022; 160(2): 517. CrossRef
First
Prev
