Our research examines the learning curves of various minimally invasive lumbar surgeries to determine the benefits and challenges they pose to both surgeons and patients. The advent of microsurgical techniques since the 1960s, including advances in fluoroscopic navigation and intraoperative computed tomography, has significantly shifted spinal surgery from open to minimally invasive methods. This study critically evaluates surgical duration, intraoperative conversions to open surgery, and complications as primary parameters to gauge these learning curves. Through a comprehensive literature search up to March 2024, involving databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, this paper identifies a steep learning curve associated with these surgeries. Despite their proven advantages in reducing recovery time and surgical trauma, these procedures require surgeons to master advanced technology and equipment, which can directly impact patient outcomes. The study underscores the need for well-defined learning curves to facilitate efficient training and enhance surgical proficiency, especially for novice surgeons. Moreover, it addresses the implications of technology on surgical accuracy and the subsequent effects on complication rates, providing insights into the complex dynamics of adopting new surgical innovations in spinal health care.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Analgesia peridural caudal como manejo de dolor postquirúrgico en cirugía de columna lumbar: serie de 20 casos Marvin Gabriel Cruz Álvarez, Ana Lilia Guerrero Molina, Ozcar Felipe García López Cirugía de Columna.2026; 4(2): 85. CrossRef
Eficacia y seguridad de técnicas mínimamente invasivas para la descompresión lumbosacra en pacientes con dolor radicular: análisis retrospectivo de hemilaminectomía, discectomía y técnica over-the-top en un hospital de segundo nivel Jorge Andrés Esparza Piña, Luis Mario Uribe Cirugía de Columna.2026; 4(2): 102. CrossRef
Improvement in low back pain following endoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis Maria Auron, Yihyun Roh, Maria C. Pedraza Ciro, Win Boonsirikamchai, Yi-Hao Liang, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105995. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Complication Management During Uniportal and Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Dural Tear and Bleeding Siravich Suvithayasiri, Ju Eun Kim, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Marcus Serra, Christopher Martin, Viswanadha Arunkumar, Sotirios Veranis, Prashanth Rao, Enrico Giordan, Piya Chavalparit, Nelson Astur, Samuel Cho, Jin Sung Kim Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sophie-Liliane Rosenke, Myles Kisekka, Hiend Darweesh, Brawin Kajenthra, Jake Hewitt, Daniele Ramsay, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Dragan Jankovic, Daniel Scurtu, Darius Kalasauskas, Andreas Kramer, Florian Ringel, Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic resection of lumbar intradural spinal tumors: A case series on feasibility, safety, and preliminary outcomes Facundo Van Isseldyk, Vincent Hagel Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106040. CrossRef
Letter to the Editor regarding “Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Transforaminal Approach (MI-FLT) to ventrally located intradural lesions of the thoracic spine without instability: case series and technical note” Preeti Lamba Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(4): 101820. CrossRef
O‐Arm Navigation Enhances Facet Preservation Without Compromising Clinical Outcomes in UBE Decompression for Radiographically Stable Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Single‐Center Comparative Study Yi Liu, Yiwei Xie, Zhibao Chen, Ruijun Xu, Haojie Chen, Xiaojian Ye, Jiangming Yu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026; 18(6): 1203. CrossRef
Validation of the VIEW score: a novel intraoperative grading scale for visualization in endoscopic spine surgery Vit Kotheeranurak, Surachat Jaroenwareekul, Jin-Sung Kim, Christoph Siepe, Don Young Park, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390. CrossRef
Prevalence and treatment outcomes of incidental dural tears in lumbar spine surgery M. Mofizur Rahman, Mohammad Abdul Hannan, M. Sarwar Jahan, Moniruzzaman Monir International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics.2025; 11(5): 991. CrossRef
Objective To describe the full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty with midline skin incision (FEFM) and lateral recess decompression procedure and to report its clinical outcomes at the 1-year follow-up.
Methods Consecutive patients with lumbar foraminal and/or lateral recess stenosis who underwent FEFM procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS) of back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) up to 1 year postoperatively. The complications and recurrence rate were also recorded.
Results A total of 30 cases (51 levels) were included (L3–4, 6 cases [11.8%]; L4–5, 23 [45.1%]; L5–S1, 22 cases [43.1%]). VAS scores collected at preoperative, postoperative day 1, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 9.16, 1.7, 1.36, 1.3, and 1.43, respectively. The ODI scores collected at preoperative, postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 46.63, 11.5, 10.66, and 10.46, respectively (p<0.05). The mean operation time was 88.7 minutes (range, 45–152 minutes). The length of hospital stay was 1.21 days (range, 1–3 days). No immediate complications were identified, and no patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms requiring revision surgery.
Conclusion FEFM is an effective procedure for treating foraminal and/or lateral recess stenosis. It demonstrates the capability to decompress both bilateral foraminal and lateral recess stenosis through a single-entry point.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Systematic Review Shanxi Wang, Jianbin Guan, Kaitan Yang, Haohao Liang Journal of Investigative Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A comparative study of the far lateral approach of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for L5/S1 foraminal stenosis with high iliac crest: a retrospective cohort study Jie Zhang, Xuanwen Liu, En Song, Dan Chen, Hongda Zhou, Qin Luo International Orthopaedics.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between 2 motion preservation surgeries, cervical disc replacement (CDR) and posterior endoscopic cervical decompression (PECD), for unilateral cervical radiculopathy.
Methods Between February 2018 and December 2020, 60 patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy who underwent either CDR or PECD were retrospectively recruited as matched pairs. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and satisfaction rates. The radiographic outcome was index level motion. Intraoperative data, complications, and hospital stay were collected. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
Results Patients undergoing CDR or PECD were included, with 30 cases in each group. Matched pairs were compared in terms of demographic data and preoperative measurements. CDR was associated with shorter operative times, whereas PECD resulted in less intraoperative blood loss. The total complication rate was 5%. NDI and VAS for neck and arm were significantly improved in both groups, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. Satisfaction rates of good and excellent exceeded 87% in both groups. CDR was superior to PECD in the restoration of disc height. Early postoperative follow-up showed no significant difference in terms of index level motion. PECD demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays and quicker return-to-work times (p<0.05).
Conclusion PECD achieved equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with CDR when the certain criteria for surgery were met. Both techniques demonstrated the potential to maintain index level motion. Additionally, PECD resulted in less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster return-to-work times. Conversely, CDR offered shorter operative times and better restoration of disc height.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for cervicothoracic junction disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial Huaibin Wang, Hui Li, Rushuo Wei, Hao Yan, Ruzhan Yao, Weiqiang Liu, Ling Li Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus minimally invasive posterior cervical procedures as motion preserving surgeries for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Jia Yi Loh, Xian Jun Ngoh, Zhihong Chew, Yee Gen Lim, Michael Janssen, Jiang Lei European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of surgical outcomes between posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy and microscope-assisted ACDF in patients with single-level unilateral radicular symptomatology of cervical disc herniation: a single-center retrospective study Yin He, Jing Zhang, Dawei Ren, Tianping Xi, Zhilin Li European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes and Patient Perspectives in Full Endoscopic Cervical Surgery: A Systematic Review Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Sung Tan Cho, Ayush Sharma, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Meng-Huang Wu, Lo Cho Yau, Hyun-Jin Park, Ho-Jin Lee Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 81. CrossRef
Advancing the future of endoscopic spine surgery Wongthawat Liawrungrueang Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): IX. CrossRef
Objective To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) between direct and indirect decompression in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
Methods Patients who underwent single-level LLIF were randomized into 2 groups: direct decompression (group D) and indirect decompression (group I). Clinical outcomes including the Oswestry Disability index and visual analogue scale of back and leg pain were collected. Radiographic outcomes including cross-sectional area (CSA) of thecal sac, disc height, foraminal height, foraminal area, fusion rate, segmental, and lumbar lordosis were measured.
Results Twenty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were eligible for the analysis, with a distribution of 14 subjects in each group. The average age was 66.1 years. Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in all clinical parameters. However, these improvements did not show significant difference between both groups at all follow-up periods. All radiographic outcomes were not different between both groups, except for the increase in CSA which was significantly greater in group D (77.73 ± 20.26 mm2 vs. 54.32 ± 35.70 mm2, p = 0.042). Group I demonstrated significantly lower blood loss (68.13 ± 32.06 mL vs. 210.00 ± 110.05 mL, p < 0.005), as well as shorter operative time (136.35 ± 28.07 minutes vs. 182.18 ± 42.67 minutes, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate was not different.
Conclusion Indirect decompression through LLIF results in comparable clinical improvement to LLIF with additional direct decompression over 1-year follow-up period. These findings suggest that, for an appropriate candidate, direct decompression in LLIF might not be necessary since the ligamentotaxis effect achieved through indirect decompression appears sufficient to relieve symptoms while diminishing blood loss and operative time.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Role of Hounsfield Units in Predicting Cage Subsidence After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chen Zhang, Zachary Chu, Jonathan Boey, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh World Neurosurgery.2026; 208: 124836. CrossRef
Mid-term effects of posterior versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion on spinopelvic alignment and clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative cohort study Haixu Wang, Wei Du, Li Zhang, Xiaoping Wang, Rong Chen, Lanchun Ren, Yue Zheng, Zhe Lin, Zhiyong Hou Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression after oblique and lateral lumbar interbody fusions Kyle M M Behrens, Hossein Elgafy World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A systematic review of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery with interbody fusion Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Ho-Jin Lee, Sang Bum Kim, Sang-Min Park, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Hyun-Jin Park Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 275. CrossRef
Is Congenital Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis a Contraindication for Indirect Decompression by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Thada Nashinoros, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Vit Kotheeranurak, Worawat Limthongkul Global Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective A preliminary report from a single institution, noninferiority, prospective randomized controlled trial is conducted to determine the effectiveness of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) versus microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) for the treatment of L5–S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Methods This prospective, noncrossover, randomized controlled trials was conducted at a single neurosurgical center. Patients with symptomatic radiculopathy or intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by LDH were enrolled from July 2016 to July 2021. The study compared the effectiveness of microscopic and full-endoscopic discectomy procedures. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index scores, radiologic measurements, endurance time of walking, and satisfaction rate.
Results Of 37 assessed patients, both IELD and MLD groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores for pain over time, with no significant difference between them. For secondary outcomes, the IELD group had a shorter hospital stay and reduced blood loss but a longer operation time than the MLD group. Radiographic evaluations showed no change compared to preoperative data. Patient satisfaction and recovery rates were slightly higher for the MLD group, but both groups were comparable in most evaluations, with complications being minimal.
Conclusion The IELD was noninferior in improving the intensity of back and leg pain and functional disability, compared to the MLD. Additionally, the IELD showed no difference in clinical outcomes for patients in terms of radiographic results and patient satisfaction rates. The results of this research preliminarily demonstrate that the IELD could be considered an effective alternative to MLD for L5–S1 central or paracentral LDH.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of 20 cohort studies Mingjiang Luo, Shihang Long, Ziliang Zhao, Wei Lin, Zhihong Xiao Journal of Orthopaedics.2026; 72: 250. CrossRef
The Initial Learning and Supply Cost Curve of Incorporating Interlaminar and Transforaminal Endoscopy at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center Mark M Zaki, Edward S Harake, Varun G Kathawate, Michael J Strong, Rushikesh S Joshi, Joseph R Linzey, Yamaan S Saadeh, Osama N Kashlan Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond the Microscope: Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard for Lumbar Disc Herniation? Borriwat Santipas, Jin Sung Kim, Korawish Mekariya, John Y.S. Choi, Samuel K. Cho Neurospine.2026; 23(1): 61. CrossRef
Improvement in low back pain following endoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis Maria Auron, Yihyun Roh, Maria C. Pedraza Ciro, Win Boonsirikamchai, Yi-Hao Liang, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105995. CrossRef
Comments on “Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety” Weiyao Jing, Qiang Liu, Xiaozheng Du International Journal of Surgery.2026; 112(3): 8759. CrossRef
Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: Are We Finally There? A Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness Against Non-microscopic Discectomy, Microdiscectomy and Tubular Discectomy Kajetan Latka, Klaudia Kozlowska, Kacper Domisiewicz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dariusz Latka The Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Far-Lateral Transforaminal Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations Jin Seop Hwang, Sang Hyub Lee, Dain Jeong, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Chung Kee Chough Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 14. CrossRef
Patient-reported functional outcomes of endoscopic lumbar microdiscectomy: A non-inferiority meta-analysis Mireya Rahman, Emma Butler, Justin Choy Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2025; 40: 102037. CrossRef
A meta-analysis of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: assessing surgical efficacy and clinical outcomes Ahmed M. Taha, Awad Hegab, Mohammed Yousef, Marwan Abdelhakam, Shaimaa Ahmed Dahshan Neurological Research.2025; 47(10): 997. CrossRef
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy in South Korea Jong Joo Lee, Min Cheol Chang, Dong Ah Shin, Jin Hoon Park, Miyoung Choi, Hyung-Youl Park, In Soo Kim, Jung-Kil Lee, Chung-Kee Chough, Seung Hwan Yoon, Seong-Soo Choi, Sung-Woo Choi Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 366. CrossRef
Radiographic Anatomy and Clinical Value of the Modified Corner Approach in Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Sizheng Zhan, Haoning Ma, Yuming Wang, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang Orthopaedic Surgery.2025; 17(9): 2640. CrossRef
Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review Warayos Trathitephun, Akarawit Asawasaksakul, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Boonserm Pakdeenit, Abhirat Suebsing, Yanting Liu, Jin-Sung Kim, Siravich Suvithayasiri Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 756. CrossRef
Evaluating the effectiveness of the transcorporeal approach in minimally invasive spine surgery for cervical spinal disease: a comprehensive review and technical insights Yanting Liu, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Vit Kotheeranurak, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Kyung-Chul Choi, Gun Choi, Junseok Bae, Jin-Sung Kim BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Construction and validation: A nomogram model to predict recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy Yong Zhou, Ren-Lin Huang, Yi Liu, Chen Feng Medicine.2024; 103(49): e40828. CrossRef
Hybrid Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy Using Robotic Arm and Navigation for Highly Migrated Calcified Disc Herniation Yi-Hao Liang, Rohit Akshay Kavishwar, Maria Pedraza, Dimas Rahman Setiawan, Jae-Hwan Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1126. CrossRef
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques Kun Wu, Zhihe Yun, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Yihao Liang, Dimas Rahman Setiawan, Vit Kotheeranurak, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Enrico Giordan, Qinyi Liu, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1251. CrossRef
Objective We aim to report the outcomes and feasibility of endoscopic spine surgery used to treat symptomatic spinal metastases patients. This is the most extensive series of spinal metastases patients who underwent endoscopic spine surgery.
Methods A worldwide collaborative network group of endoscopic spine surgeons, named ‘ESSSORG,’ was established. Patients diagnosed with spinal metastases who underwent endoscopic spine surgery from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All related patient data and clinical outcomes were gathered and analyzed before the surgery and the followtime period of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Results A total of 29 patients from South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and India, were included. The mean age was 59.59 years, and 11 of them were female. The total number of decompressed levels was 40. The technique was relatively equal (15 uniportal; 14 biportal). The average length of admission was 4.41 days. Of all patients with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of D or lower before surgery, 62.06% reported having at least one recovery grade after the surgery. Almost all clinical outcomes parameters statistically significantly improved and maintained from 2 weeks to 6 months after the surgery. Few surgical-related complications (4 cases) were reported.
Conclusion Endoscopic spine surgery is a valid option for treating spinal metastases patients as it could yield comparable results to other minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. As the aim is to improve the quality of life, this procedure is valuable and holds value in palliative oncologic spine surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Endoscopic resection of lumbar intradural spinal tumors: A case series on feasibility, safety, and preliminary outcomes Facundo Van Isseldyk, Vincent Hagel Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106040. CrossRef
Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Epidural Metastatic Tumors: A Surgical Technical Note With a Case Series Chan Yang Noh, Il Choi, Junsoo Jang Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 140. CrossRef
Technical Feasibility and Safety of Transpedicular Thoracic Partial Corpectomy Using Biportal Endoscopic Technique: A Novel Approach for Separation Surgery in Spinal Metastatic Disease Yohannes Ghenbot, Joshua Golubovsky, Hasan S. Ahmad, John D. Arena, Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Rahwa Ghenbot, Mert Marcel Dagli, Daksh Chauhan, Emily Ling-Lin Pai, Jang W. Yoon World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123582. CrossRef
Applications of endoscopic techniques in spinal oncology: A systematic review of the contemporary literature Saarang Patel, Mohammad Faizan Khan, Ryan Gensler, Nolan J. Brown, Marcos Real, Zach Pennington, Mohammad Zoha Khan, Julian Gendreau, Ronald Sahyouni, Martin H. Pham Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111232. CrossRef
Advancements in Spinal Endoscopic Surgery: Comprehensive Techniques and Pathologies Addressed by Full Endoscopy Beyond Lumbar Disc Herniation Jad El Choueiri, Francesca Pellicanò, Edoardo Caimi, Francesco Laurelli, Leonardo Di Cosmo, Ali Darwiche Rada, Daniel Cernigoi, Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige, Giorgio Cracchiolo, Donato Creatura, Ali Baram, Carlo Brembilla, Gabriele Capo Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(11): 3685. CrossRef
Thoracic spine metastases from lung cancer with incomplete paralysis treated by endoscopic spinal surgery: a case report Ningdao Li, Runhan Zhao, Jun Zhang, Xiaoji Luo, Xifeng Zhang European Spine Journal.2025; 34(8): 3549. CrossRef
Extensive thoracic vertebral and chest wall metastases as the initial presentation of breast cancer: a case report and literature review Yergen N. Kenzhegulov, Daniyar K. Zhamoldin, Victor G. Aleinikov, Talgat T. Kerimbayev, Berik Zhetpisbaev, Serik Akshulakov Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Spine endoscopic surgery establishment for disc disease (Neurocore-SENSED): an open and decentralized consensus Mejdeddine Al Barajraji, Sami Barrit, Adam Boukind, Albert E. Telfeian, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Mehdi Afathi, Frank Hassel, Peter B. Derman, Maxime Challali, Alexandre Simonin, Antoine Devalckeneer, Ryoji Tominaga, Jean-Charles Le Huec, Xavier A. Santander, Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 105604. CrossRef
Endoscopie rachidienne : techniques, indications et limites Benjamin Bouyer, Henri d’Astorg Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique.2025; 111(6): 663. CrossRef
Full-endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach for the devastating spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess Siravich Suvithayasiri, Chan-Woong Park, Yanting Liu, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 105881. CrossRef
Full-Endoscopic Resection of a Lumbar Intradural Tumor (Schwannoma): Video Case Report and Description of the Surgical Technique Vincent Hagel, Facundo Van Isseldyk Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1096. CrossRef
Commentary on “The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries” Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Vit Kotheeranurak Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 620. CrossRef
Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Insights from Cutting-Edge Technology in the Industrial Field Woon-Tak Yuh, You-Sang Lee, Il Choi Bioengineering.2023; 10(12): 1363. CrossRef
Near infrared imaging system for preventing blood vision obstruction in endoscopy Meng-Huang Wu, Jason C. Hsu, Jin-Sung Kim, Tsung-Jen Huang, Yi-Hung Huang, Hon Pan Yiu, Ching-Yu Lee, Jowy Tani, Cheng-Chun Chang Optics Express.2023; 31(26): 43877. CrossRef
Yanting Liu, Vit Kotheeranurak, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Van Isseldyk Facundo, Sagar Sharma, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Guang-Xun Lin, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Hussam Jabri, Ashwinkumar Vasant Khandge, Rajendra B. Aher, Meng-Huang Wu, Angela Wing Hang Ho, Nang Man Raymond Wong, Lau Sun Wing, Kutbuddin Akbary, Kandarpkumar K. Patel, Boonserm Pakdeenit, Kuo Tai Chen, Yadhu K. Lokanath, Milin S. Jaiswal, Tsz King Suen, Ghazwan A. Hasan, Luigi Andrew Sabal, Jin-Sung Kim
Neurospine 2023;20(1):374-389. Published online March 31, 2023
Objective The ever-growing number of articles related to full-endoscopic spine surgery published in the last few decades presents a challenge which is perplexing and time-consuming in identifying the current research status. The study aims to identify and analyze the most cited works related to full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery, compare the articles published by different publishers and area, and show the current publication status of full-endoscopic research.
Methods Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science database between 1992 and 2022. Spine has the highest H-index with the most-cited journal in the field of full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery. China ranked as the most productive country, whereas the most cited with high H-index papers came from South Korea. For the author analysis, Yeung AT, Ruetten S, Hoogland T, Ahn Y, Choi G, and Mayer HM were the most impactful authors in the global and local citations. The most productive organization is Wooridul Spine Hospital.
Conclusion The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery over the past 30 years. It has demonstrated that there is a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and internationally collaborated countries. However, the quality of studies is still low, and the lack of high-quality clinical evidence and the trend of general journal submissions has somewhat affected the quality of endoscopy journals in recent years.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Low-Cost Augmented Reality System in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Analysis of Surgeon Ergonomics, Perceived Workload and A Step-by-Step Guide for Implementation Facundo Van Isseldyk, Piya Chavalparit, Julio Bassani, Lisandro Rodriguez Sattler, Marcus Serra, Jefferson Leal, Cristian Correa Valencia, Alberto Gotfryd, Jeronimo Milano, Alfredo Guiroy, Jin Sung Kim Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(2): 873. CrossRef
Improvement in low back pain following endoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis Maria Auron, Yihyun Roh, Maria C. Pedraza Ciro, Win Boonsirikamchai, Yi-Hao Liang, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105995. CrossRef
Full Endoscopic Excision of a Large Intradural Extramedullary Tumor: A Technical Note Kanthila Mahesha, H. Shatananda Prasad Rao Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 124. CrossRef
Global trends and insights in vascular surgery research from 2000 to 2023 Arshia P. Javidan, Polycronis P. Akouris, Kaan Y. Balta, Wafa Baqri, Leslie Summers DeLuca, Ahmed Kayssi JVS-Vascular Insights.2025; 3: 100184. CrossRef
Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (EELF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a prospective observational study Jun-Hoe Kim, Hangeul Park, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Classification of endoscopic spine procedures Mazda Farshad, Christoph J. Laux, Florian Wanivenhaus, José M. Spirig, Jonas Widmer, Michael Kelly, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Jin-Sung Kim, Facundo van Isseldyk, Sohrab Gollogly, James Yue, Xuexiao Ma, Vincent Hagel, Frédéric Cornaz North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 22: 100603. CrossRef
O-arm navigation-based transforaminal unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: an innovative preliminary study Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jin-Sung Kim, Jin Sub Hwang, Jin Young Lee, Dong-Geun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Jun Yong Kim, Yong-Eun Cho, Dong Chan Lee Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 194. CrossRef
Are There Unique Barriers and Opportunities for Access to Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Low-Income Countries? A Narrative Review Adham M. Khalafallah, Sara Diez, Long Di, Saqib Hasan, Sanjay Konakondla, Osama N. Kashlan, Peter Derman, Mark Mahan, Raymond J. Gardocki, Albert Telfeian, Christoph P. Hofstetter, Gregory Basil Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(11): 3876. CrossRef
Full-endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach for the devastating spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess Siravich Suvithayasiri, Chan-Woong Park, Yanting Liu, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 105881. CrossRef
Global Trends and Hotspots of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis Dacheng Sang, Jinyang Guo, Hanlu Meng, Luofei Zhang, Hongpeng Sang Journal of Pain Research.2024; Volume 17: 117. CrossRef
Bibliometric analysis of machine learning trends and hotspots in arthroplasty literature over 31 years Matthew P. Corsi, Fong H. Nham, Eliana Kassis, Mouhanad M. El-Othmani Journal of Orthopaedics.2024; 51: 142. CrossRef
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A Follow-up Exceeding 5 Years Xinyu Yang, Shijun Zhang, Junxiao Su, Sai Guo, Yakubu Ibrahim, Kai Zhang, Yonghao Tian, Lianlei Wang, Suomao Yuan, Xinyu Liu Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 303. CrossRef
Trends and hotspots in gastrointestinal neoplasms risk assessment: A bibliometric analysis from 1984 to 2022 Qiang-Qiang Fu, Le Ma, Xiao-Min Niu, Hua-Xin Zhao, Xu-Hua Ge, Hua Jin, De-Hua Yu, Sen Yang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(6): 2842. CrossRef
Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review Warayos Trathitephun, Akarawit Asawasaksakul, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Boonserm Pakdeenit, Abhirat Suebsing, Yanting Liu, Jin-Sung Kim, Siravich Suvithayasiri Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 756. CrossRef
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques Kun Wu, Zhihe Yun, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Yihao Liang, Dimas Rahman Setiawan, Vit Kotheeranurak, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Enrico Giordan, Qinyi Liu, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1251. CrossRef
Full-Endoscopic Resection of a Lumbar Intradural Tumor (Schwannoma): Video Case Report and Description of the Surgical Technique Vincent Hagel, Facundo Van Isseldyk Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1096. CrossRef
Commentary on “The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries” Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Vit Kotheeranurak Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 620. CrossRef
The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries Siravich Suvithayasiri, Young-Jin Kim, Yanting Liu, Warayos Trathitephun, Akarawit Asawasaksaku, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Vit Kotheeranurak, Haroldo Chagas, Cristian Correa Valencia, Marcus Vinicius Serra, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Lung-Hsing Lee, Chien-Min Chen Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 608. CrossRef
Full-endoscopic bilateral over-the-top decompression in lumbar central stenosis: surgical technique and outcomes Christoph J. Siepe, Anna-Lena Bridts, Mohamed Ayman, Daniel Sauer, Christoph Mehren European Spine Journal.2023; 32(8): 2918. CrossRef
A Century of Evolution in Spine Surgery Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Field From 1900 to 2023 David B. Kurland, Alexander T. M. Cheung, Nora C. Kim, Kimberly Ashayeri, Teresa Hidalgo, Anthony Frempong-Boadu, Eric Karl Oermann, Douglas Kondziolka Neurosurgery.2023; 93(5): 1121. CrossRef
A Modified Laminotomy for Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Technical Report and Preliminary Results Zhiyun Feng, Yuxu Wu, Honghao Wu, Tae Gyong Jon, Ying Yuan, Zhong Chen, Yue Wang Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1513. CrossRef
Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Preliminary Analysis of L5–S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Outcomes in Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials Yanting Liu, Youngjin Kim, Chan Woong Park, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1457. CrossRef
Objective No consensus criteria have been established regarding ideal candidates for indirect decompression with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and contributing factors of indirect decompression failure were rarely reported. We aim to investigate the success rate of indirect decompression by LLIF with proposed selection criteria and identify risk factors associated with indirect decompression failure, defined as persistent pain requiring revision with direct decompression.
Methods Data from 191 patients undergoing LLIF were retrospectively reviewed. All the following criteria must be fulfilled: (1) dynamic clinical symptoms (pain relief in supine position), (2) presence of reducible disc height (recovered disc height in supine position), (3) no profound weakness, and (4) no static stenosis. The success rate of indirect decompression with LLIF and results after at least 1 year of follow-up were collected. Preoperative, procedure-related, and postoperative factors were assessed for their relationship with failure.
Results Of 191 patients,13 patients (6.8%) required additional direct decompression due to persistent pain, giving a criteria success rate of 93.2%. Factors associated with indirect decompression failure included low bone mineral density (T-score < 2.1), low reducible disc height (<13%), low postoperative disc height (< 10 mm), high-grade cage subsidence, and use of plate fixation.
Conclusion We proposed patient selection criteria for indirect decompression with LLIF which had a satisfactory success rate and identified factors associated with the need for additional direct decompression. Our proposed criteria may assist selection of patients likely to achieve good results following indirect decompression with LLIF, and optimize selection based on risk factors of failure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Is Congenital Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis a Contraindication for Indirect Decompression by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Thada Nashinoros, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Vit Kotheeranurak, Worawat Limthongkul Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(5): 2117. CrossRef
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion With Lateral Vertebral Screw Fixation Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Xuefeng Li, Cheng Lin, Tangyiheng Chen, Renjie Li, Dapeng Li, Sheng Song, Huilin Yang, Genlei Chu, Weimin Jiang, Yijie Liu Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Lumbar Foraminal Morphology Can Affect Outcomes of Indirect Decompression: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification Rakan Bokhari, Mohamad Bakhaidar, Abdulrahman Alnaseem, Khalid Bajunaid, Omar Aljohani, Mohamed Alwadai, Saman Shabani, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Christoph P. Hofstetter, Muhammad Abd-El-Barr Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Global research landscape and citation dynamics of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential articles Badr Hafiz, Thamer Alsharif, Faisal Sukkar, Moaath Alghamdi, Ali Zaki Alhabib, Shuruq Obaid Alshammari, Saleh Baeesa Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106043. CrossRef
The iLLIF score: a predictive success scoring system for indirect decompression in lateral lumbar interbody fusion Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Narat Virojanawat, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Surachat Jaroenwareekul, Worawat Limthongkul, Vit Kotheeranurak, Weerasak Singhatanadgige European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Static Versus Expandable Cages in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Ryan S. Beyer, Tara Shooshani, Bianca Batista, Genevieve M. Fraipont, Omead Pooladzandi, Nolan J. Brown, Zach Pennington, Martin H. Pham Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(7): 326. CrossRef
Factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression after oblique and lateral lumbar interbody fusions Kyle M M Behrens, Hossein Elgafy World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient selection and workup David Strong, Joel Steiner, Robert Lee Seminars in Spine Surgery.2025; 37(1): 101158. CrossRef
Ligamentotaxis Effect of Lateral Lumber Interbody Fusion and Cage Subsidence Ryosuke Tomio Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(13): 4554. CrossRef
Pearls and Pitfalls of Revision Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Technical Note Jiawen Fong, Zi Xian Justin Chou, Walter-Soon-Yaw Wong, Yilun Huang Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of microscope-assisted modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion and impact on lumbar lordosis and intervertebral height Weijian Wang, Jilong An, Jiaqi Li, Han Wu, Haoyu Wu, Yapeng Sun, Wei Zhang BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Three Cases of Indirect Decompression Failure Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Requiring Early Direct Posterior Decompression: Analysis of Etiologies and Literature Review Satoshi Hattori, Satoru Matsutani Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of midterm outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion with lateral vertebral body screw fixation for single level spondylolisthesis Fu-Cheng Kao, Shih-Feng Hung, Yu-Pao Hsu, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Hung-Kang Wu, Ming-Te Cheng, Kuang-Kai Hsueh, Po-Yuan Lin, Ching-Hsiao Yu BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction of Angle Loss after L4/5 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Development of a Risk Stratification Model Se-Woon Kim, Su-Hun Lee, Jun-Seok Lee, Chi-Hyung Lee, Chang-Hyun Kim, Soon-Ki Sung, Dong-Wuk Son, Sang-Weon Lee Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2025; 68(6): 724. CrossRef
Efficacy observation of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in treating severe spinal stenosis Yiliya Yilihamu, Jun Mo, Zhanjun Ma, Jianjiang Li, Yifei Huang BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is Direct Decompression Necessary for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Direct and Indirect Decompression With LLIF in Selected Patients Worawat Limthongkul, Chayapong Thanapura, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Pakawas Praisarnti, Vit Kotheeranurak, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Weerasak Singhatanadgige Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 342. CrossRef
Impact of Osteoporosis on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe World Neurosurgery.2024; 188: e424. CrossRef
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation: Does Variability in Cage Position Influence Clinical Outcomes? Xingda Chen, Liekun Chen, Jingjing Tang, Wanyan Chen, Zefeng Song, Zelin Zhou, Hang Zhuo, Riwei Tan, Rueishiuan Jiang, Wenhua Zhao, De Liang, Hui Ren, Gengyang Shen, Xiaobing Jiang World Neurosurgery.2024; 189: e904. CrossRef
A Comprehensive Analysis of Potential Complications after Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion : A Review of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Scans in Over 400 Cases Kang-Hoon Lee, Su-Hun Lee, Jun-Seok Lee, Young-Ha Kim, Soon-Ki Sung, Dong-Wuk Son, Sang-Weon Lee, Geun-Sung Song Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2024; 67(5): 550. CrossRef
Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Outcomes Requiring Additional Intervention Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Worawat Limthongkul, Bandid Chaiwongwattana, Stephen J. Kerr, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Vit Kotheeranurak, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 845. CrossRef
Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol Joonsoo Lim, Jangyeob Lim, Asfandyar Khan, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sejin Choi, Tae-Shin Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Sangwook T. Yoon, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery combined with mini-incision OLIF and anterolateral screws rod fixation vs. MIS-TLIF for surgical treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis Tianyao Zhou, Wenshuai Fan, Yutong Gu, Wu Che, Liang Zhang, Yichao Wang Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Hybrid surgery of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) combined with OLIF and anterolateral screws rod fixation for treatment of multi-level lumbar degenerative diseases with intervertebral instability Tianyao Zhou, Yutong Gu Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing Efficacy of Lumbar Disc Space Preparation via an Anterior-to-Psoas Approach Between Intraoperative Conventional Fluoroscopy and Computed Tomographic-Based Navigation System: A Cadaveric Study Worawat Limthongkul, Waranyoo Wathanavasin, Vit Kotheeranurak, Thanadol Tangdamrongtham, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige World Neurosurgery.2023; 176: e226. CrossRef
Mini-Open Intercostal Retroperitoneal Approach for Upper Lumbar Spine Lateral Interbody Fusion Su Hun Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Sung Hyun Bae, Jun Seok Lee, Young Ha Kim, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 553. CrossRef
Effective Modulation of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress for Enhanced Regeneration of Intervertebral Discs Using 3D Porous Hybrid Protein Nanoscaffold Letao Yang, Basanta Bhujel, Yannan Hou, Jeffrey Luo, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han, Ki‐Bum Lee Advanced Materials.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Letter to the Editor : Classifying the Anatomical Location of the Ureter after Retroperitoneal Dissection Su-Hun Lee, Dong-Wuk Son, Jun-Seok Lee, Geun-Sung Song Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2023; 66(5): 605. CrossRef
Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis Hui Lv, Yu Sheng Yang, Jian Hong Zhou, Yuan Guo, Hui Chen, Fei Luo, Jian Zhong Xu, Zhong Rong Zhang, Ze Hua Zhang Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 824. CrossRef
Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular screw fixation: Comparison between conventional double position versus navigation-assisted single lateral position Junghoon Han, Chang-Min Ha, Woon Tak Yuh, Young San Ko, Jun-Hoe Kim, Tae-Shin Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sungjoon Lee, Sun-Ho Lee, Asfandyar Khan, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim, Mohamed El-Sayed Abdel-Wanis PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291114. CrossRef
Enhanced Intervertebral Disc Repair via Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Tetracycline Regulatory System Yeji Kim, Seong Bae An, Sang-Hyuk Lee, Jong Joo Lee, Sung Bum Kim, Jae-Cheul Ahn, Dong-Youn Hwang, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(22): 16024. CrossRef
Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Administration of Matrilin-3-Primed Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Phase 1 Clinical Trial Dong Hyun Lee, Kwang-Sook Park, Hae Eun Shin, Sung Bum Kim, Hyejeong Choi, Seong Bae An, Hyemin Choi, Joo Pyung Kim, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(23): 16827. CrossRef
An Expanded Surgical Corridor of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4–5: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Worawat Limthongkul, Pakawas Praisarnti, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Natavut Prasertkul, Vit Kotheeranurak, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1450. CrossRef
First
Prev
