Neal A. Patel, Sinead O’Bryant, Christopher D. Rogers, Candler K. Boyett, Sachiv Chakravarti, Julian Gendreau, Nolan J. Brown, Zach A. Pennington, Neill B. Hatcher, Cathleen Kuo, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham
Neurospine 2023;20(2):451-463. Published online June 30, 2023
Interbody fusion is a workhorse technique in lumbar spine surgery that facilities indirect decompression, sagittal plane realignment, and successful bony fusion. The 2 most commonly employed cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloy and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). While Ti alloy implants have superior osteoinductive properties they more poorly match the biomechanical properties of cancellous bones. Newly developed 3-dimensional (3D)-printed porous titanium (3D-pTi) address this disadvantage and are proposed as a new standard for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) devices. In the present study, the literature directly comparing 3D-pTi and PEEK interbody devices is systematically reviewed with a focus on fusion outcomes and subsidence rates reported in the in vitro, animal, and human literature. A systematic review directly comparing outcomes of PEEK and 3D-pTi interbody spinal cages was performed. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score for cohort studies was 6.4. A total of 7 eligible studies were included, comprising a combination of clinical series, ovine animal data, and in vitro biomechanical studies. There was a total population of 299 human and 59 ovine subjects, with 134 human (44.8%) and 38 (64.4%) ovine models implanted with 3D-pTi cages. Of the 7 studies, 6 reported overall outcomes in favor of 3D-pTi compared to PEEK, including subsidence and osseointegration, while 1 study reported neutral outcomes for device related revision and reoperation rate. Though limited data are available, the current literature supports 3D-pTi interbodies as offering superior fusion outcomes relative to PEEK interbodies for LIF without increasing subsidence or reoperation risk. Histologic evidence suggests 3D-Ti to have superior osteoinductive properties that may underlie these superior outcomes, but additional clinical investigation is merited.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Polyetheretherketone vs Titanium Cages in Spinal Fusion: Spin Bias in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Henry Avetisian, Apurva Prasad, Kevin Mathew, David McCavitt, William J. Karakash, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond J. Hah, Ram K. Alluri Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 47. CrossRef
Lumbar Fusion With Micro- & Nano-Textured, 3D Printed Porous Titanium Versus PEEK Interbody Cages in TLIF: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial Joshua H. Weinberg, Nathan Ritchey, Witty Kwok, Shravani Khisti, Bryan Ladd, Stephanus Viljoen, Siri S. Khalsa, David S. Xu, Andrew J. Grossbach Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 434. CrossRef
Risk factors for subsidence and loss of segmental lordosis segmental lordosisfollowing 1–3-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for degenerative disease: A time-to-event analysis Zach Pennington, Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Nikita Lakomkin, William E. Krauss, Michelle J. Clarke, Brett A. Freedman, Melvin D. Helgeson, Ahmad N. Nassr, Arjun S. Sebastian, Anthony L. Mikula, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2026; 144: 111818. CrossRef
Oblique lateral interbody fusion: role of the elastic modulus of the cage material in mechanically induced osteogenesis Teng Lu, Zhongwei Sun, Xijing He Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.2026; 276: 109242. CrossRef
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages Compared With Open TLIF: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates Sang Hyub Lee, Junghan Seo, Dain Jeong, Sang Youp Han, Dong Hyun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S28. CrossRef
Design and biomechanical evaluation of a 3D-printed lumbar interbody fusion cage with auxetic metamaterial structure Qiang Zhang, Junwei Li, Yuandong Li, Ningze Zhang, Huizhi Wang, Yangyang Yang, Qingqing Yang, Fuhao Mo, Cheng-Kung Cheng Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2026; 180: 107465. CrossRef
Predictors of Interbody Fusion and Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Pathologies Zach Pennington, Abdelrahman M. Hamouda, Stanley Dennison, Michael L. Martini, Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Jana Khalifeh, Rawad Turko, Mohamed M. El-Gohary, Clare A. Fogelson, Michelle J. Clarke, William E. Krauss, Brett A. Freedman, Melvin D. Helgeson, Ahmad N Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(10): 3636. CrossRef
A survival analysis evaluating predictors of implant subsidence after one- or two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Zach Pennington, Stanley Dennison, Rahul Kumar, Michael L Martini, Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Maria Astudillo Potes, Jana Khalifeh, Rawad Turko, Katherine Zhu, Mohamed M El-Gohary, Eliana L Elder, Michelle J Clarke, William E Krauss, Bre Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2026; 151: 112105. CrossRef
Interbody Cages: Surface Technologies in Spinal Implants Joseph E. Nassar, Lama A. Ammar, Trevor L. Toavs, Jinseong Kim, Ashley Knebel, Mohammad Daher, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Alan H. Daniels Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2026; 108(13): 969. CrossRef
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with a 3D-printed porous titanium intervertebral cage J. Alex Thomas, Neil A. Tayyab, Kaveh Khajavi, R. Alden Milam, Jeremy Smith Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Ali Chahlavi Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(3): 1598. CrossRef
A comprehensive review on the State of the Art in the research and development of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) biomaterial-based implants Prabaha Sikder Acta Biomaterialia.2025; 191: 29. CrossRef
Evaluation of Healthcare Outcomes of Patients Treated with 3D-Printed-Titanium and PEEK Cages During Fusion Procedures in the Lumbar Spine Katherine Corso, Andreas Teferra, Annalisa Michielli, Kristin Corrado, Amy Marcini, Mark Lotito, Caroline Smith, Michelle Costa, Jill Ruppenkamp, Anna Wallace Medical Devices: Evidence and Research.2025; Volume 18: 37. CrossRef
High Fusion Rates with Structured Titanium TLIF Cages: A Retrospective 1-Year Study with and Without Adjacent Level Dynamic Stabilization Sonja Häckel, Jessica Gaff, Alana Celenza, Gregory Cunningham, Michael Kern, Paul Taylor, Andrew Miles Surgeries.2025; 6(3): 52. CrossRef
Preclinical evaluation of lateral interbody fusions using 3D printed PEEK or 3D printed titanium cages William Robert Walsh, Matthew Pelletier, Dan Wills, Tian Wang, Max Lloyd, Michael Veldman, Nick Cordaro, Mark Brady North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 23: 100756. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis Between Single and Double 3-Dimensional Printed Titanium Cages: 1-Year Outcomes After Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Hong Hyun, Su Yong Choi, Dong Chan Lee, Hyeun Sung Kim, Dong Hwa Heo Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(Suppl 2): S225. CrossRef
The Importance of Planning Ahead: A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Novel Trans-Facet Corridor for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Segmentation Technology Troy Q. Tabarestani, Peter N. Drossopoulos, Chuan-Ching Huang, Alyssa M. Bartlett, Mounica R. Paturu, Christopher I. Shaffrey, John H. Chi, Wilson Z. Ray, C. Rory Goodwin, Timothy J. Amrhein, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr World Neurosurgery.2024; 188: e247. CrossRef
Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review Sam Yeol Chang, Dong-Ho Kang, Samuel K. Cho Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(3): 444. CrossRef
Evolution of Titanium Interbody Cages and Current Uses of 3D Printed Titanium in Spine Fusion Surgery Justin J. Lee, Freddy P. Jacome, David M. Hiltzik, Manasa S. Pagadala, Wellington K. Hsu Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.2024; 18(12): 635. CrossRef
The ability of SPEEK to promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on PEEK surfaces Shuang Wang, Jun-xiong Ma, Liang Zheng, Hong Wang, Hai-long Yu, Yu Chen Heliyon.2024; 10(16): e36448. CrossRef
Design and study of additively manufactured Three periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structured porous titanium interbody cage Kun Li, ChunYan Tian, QiuJiang Wei, XinRui Gou, FuHuan Chu, MengJie Xu, LinHui Qiang, ShiQi Xu Heliyon.2024; 10(18): e38209. CrossRef
The evolution and integration of technology in spinal neurosurgery: A scoping review Moksada Regmi, Weihai Liu, Shikun Liu, Yuwei Dai, Ying Xiong, Jun Yang, Chenlong Yang Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2024; 129: 110853. CrossRef
The Future of Bone Repair: Emerging Technologies and Biomaterials in Bone Regeneration Julia Weronika Łuczak, Małgorzata Palusińska, Damian Matak, Damian Pietrzak, Paweł Nakielski, Sławomir Lewicki, Marta Grodzik, Łukasz Szymański International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(23): 12766. CrossRef
Commentary on “Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies” Yanting Liu, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 464. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the June 2023 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 413. CrossRef
Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nolan J. Brown, Zach Pennington, Cathleen C. Kuo, Alexander M. Lopez, Bryce Picton, Sean Solomon, Oanh T. Nguyen, Chenyi Yang, Evelyne K. Tantry, Hania Shahin, Julian Gendreau, Stephen Albano, Martin H. Pham, Michael Y. Oh Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(6): 1139. CrossRef
Omar Al Jammal, Julian Gendreau, Bejan Alvandi, Neal A. Patel, Nolan J. Brown, Shane Shahrestani, Brian V. Lien, Arash Delavar, Katelynn Tran, Ronald Sahyouni, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Kevin Gilbert, Martin H. Pham
Neurospine 2021;18(4):725-732. Published online December 31, 2021
Objective To study the impact of demographic factors on management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine and postoperative complication rates.
Methods Data was obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2010–2014. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes identified patients diagnosed with lumbar fractures or dislocations due to trauma. A series of multivariate regression models determined whether demographic variables predicted rates of complication and revision surgery.
Results A total of 38,249 patients were identified. Female patients were less likely to receive surgery and to receive a fusion when undergoing surgery, had higher complication rates, and more likely to undergo revision surgery. Medicare and Medicaid patients were less likely to receive surgical management for lumbar spine trauma and less likely to receive a fusion when operated on. Additionally, we found significant differences in surgical management and postoperative complication rates based on race, insurance type, hospital teaching status, and geography.
Conclusion Substantial differences in the surgical management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine, including postoperative complications, among individuals of demographic factors such as age, sex, race, primary insurance, hospital teaching status, and geographic region suggest the need for further studies to understand how patient demographics influence management and complications for traumatic injury to the lumbar spine.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Identification of an Operative Time Threshold for Substantially Increased Postoperative Complications After Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis Bilal Moiz, Khaled M. Taghlabi, Isuru Somawardana, Rijul Nanda, Lokeshwar S. Bhenderu, Jaime R. Guerrero, Aboud Tahanis, Amir H. Faraji World Neurosurgery.2025; 197: 123897. CrossRef
Racial Disparities in Time to Decompression in Central Cord Syndrome: A National Trauma Database Analysis Daniel Deysher, Sam H. Jiang, Harsh Khilwani, Mehul Patnam, Mounika Bhaskara, Syed Khalid, Ryan G. Chiu, Ankit I. Mehta World Neurosurgery.2023; 177: e146. CrossRef
Single position lateral fusion reduces the need for a secondary surgery and robotic guidance allows for potentially higher accuracy of screw placement. We expand the role of robotics with a simultaneous workflow where 2 surgeons can work in single position surgery and discuss the technical feasibility of placement of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws in the lateral position. A 70-year-old male presented with chronic back pain and bilateral leg pain with the left side worse than the right. He subsequently underwent an L3–S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with a minimally invasive L3-ilium robotic posterior spinal fixation simultaneously in single lateral position with S2AI screws. The software planning requisite of robotics allowed for a preoperative plan where lumbar cortical screws were used to line up with bilateral S2AI screws. Intraoperatively, the OLIF was performed anterior to the patient which allowed for a second surgeon to perform the posterior stage of screw placement simultaneously in overlapping fashion during OLIF exposure. Once all screws were placed, the OLIF discectomy and cage placement were completed. As the OLIF incision is closed, rodding proceeds posteriorly with subsequent closure simultaneously as well. Operative time from skin incision to skin closure was 3 hours and 47 minutes. We present here a novel technical report on the recommended workflow of simultaneous robotic single position surgery OLIF and demonstrate the feasibility of placement of sacroiliac fixation in the lateral decubitus position. We believe this technique to be minimally invasive, effective, with the benefit of shortening valuable operating room case time.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Extended uses of robots in spine surgery beyond thoracolumbar pedicle screws: A narrative review Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Abhishek Soni, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Prabhu Krishnan Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cirugía robótica de columna vertebral: nota técnica y análisis descriptivo de los primeros 40 casos Víctor Rodríguez-Domínguez, Jorge Bedia Cadelo, Javier Giner García, María Luisa Gandía González, Catalina Vivancos Sánchez, Alberto Isla Guerrero Neurocirugía.2025; 36(3): 169. CrossRef
Robotic spine surgery: Technical note and descriptive analysis of the first 40 cases Víctor Rodríguez-Domínguez, Jorge Bedia Cadelo, Javier Giner García, María Luisa Gandía González, Catalina Vivancos Sánchez, Alberto Isla Guerrero Neurocirugía (English Edition).2025; 36(3): 169. CrossRef
Single-Position vs Dual-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion With ALIF or OLIF: A Systematic Review Rajko S. Vucicevic, Justin Castonguay, Mohammed A. Munim, Kevin C. Jacob, Sayyida Hasan, Ilyass Majji, Alexander J. Butler, Madhav R. Patel, Andrew P. Collins, Grant Park, Justin Walsh, Alexander Parsons, Kern Singh, Matthew W. Colman Contemporary Spine Surgery.2025; 26(3): 1. CrossRef
Evolution of Robotic Spine Surgery Technologies Martin H. Pham, Nolan J. Brown Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S75. CrossRef
A Prospective Study of 3D Navigation-Guided Single-Position OLIF with Posterior Percutaneous Fixation Bharat Rajendraprasad Dave, Mrugank Narvekar, Ajay Krishnan, Devanand Degulmadi, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Mirant Bharat Dave Indian Spine Journal.2025; 8(2): 138. CrossRef
Robot-assisted vs conventional lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes Carlos M Ardila, Santiago Ángel-Estrada, Daniel González-Arroyave World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion James M. Mok, Craig Forsthoefel, Roberto Leonardo Diaz, Ye Lin, Farid Amirouche Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(5): 1524. CrossRef
Single position L5-S1 lateral ALIF with simultaneous robotic posterior fixation is safe and improves regional alignment and lordosis distribution index Nicholas S. Hernandez, L. Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham European Spine Journal.2024; 33(9): 3583. CrossRef
Spinal Robotics in Single-Position Lateral Surgery: A Narrative Review of Key Concepts and Considerations Nicholas S. Hernandez, Zach Pennington, Saarang Patel, Nolan J. Brown, Abigail Broughton, Martin H. Pham World Neurosurgery.2024; 190: 56. CrossRef
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present Anthony Xi Jie Wong, Derek Haowen Tang, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh Medicina.2024; 60(3): 378. CrossRef
Feasibility and safety report on robotic assistance for cervical pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study Seungjun Ryu, Byeong-Jin Ha, Sunjin Yoon, Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Keung-Nyun Kim, Seong Yi Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary on “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques” Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 95. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of navigation robot-assisted versus conventional oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A retrospective study Min Tong, Siping Zhang, Wenhao Zhang, Limin Mou, Zhenyu Dong, Rong Wang, Shida Li, Yifei Huang Medicine.2024; 103(32): e39261. CrossRef
Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol Joonsoo Lim, Jangyeob Lim, Asfandyar Khan, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sejin Choi, Tae-Shin Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Sangwook T. Yoon, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws Pratyush Shahi, Omri Maayan, Daniel Shinn, Sidhant Dalal, Junho Song, Kasra Araghi, Dimitra Melissaridou, Avani Vaishnav, Karim Shafi, Yuri Pompeu, Evan Sheha, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz A. Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 577. CrossRef
Commentary on “Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Chang Il Ju Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 550. CrossRef
Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Tuberculosis: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparative Study Jinyue He, Jiezhong Deng, Yusheng Yang, Tingting Zheng, Fei Luo, Jianzhong Xu, Zehua Zhang Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1306. CrossRef
Pearls and Pitfalls of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Comprehensive Narrative Review Hyoungmin Kim, Bong-Soon Chang, Sam Yeol Chang Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 163. CrossRef
Efficacy of Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Cohort Study Peng Cheng, Xiao-bo Zhang, Qi-ming Zhao, Hai-hong Zhang Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base J. Alex Thomas, Cristiano Menezes, Aaron J. Buckland, Kaveh Khajavi, Kimberly Ashayeri, Brett A. Braly, Brian Kwon, Ivan Cheng, Pedro Berjano European Spine Journal.2022; 31(9): 2167. CrossRef
Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study Hyung Cheol Kim, Yeong Ha Jeong, Sung Han Oh, Jong Min Lee, Chang Kyu Lee, Seong Yi, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Dong Ah Shin Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 12(1): 312. CrossRef
Cervical angina is an often-overlooked etiology of noncardiac chest pain that may mimic true angina pectoris but is due to cervical spine disease. Diagnosis can be difficult, and treatment ranges from conservative therapy to surgical management. However, of patient’s refractory to conservative therapy, approximately ninety percent experience postoperative relief of angina symptoms. Here, we present a case report on cervical angina and performed a systematic review of the literature. A 34-year-old male with prior surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome presented with persistent anterior neck and chest pain as well as posterior left scapular and upper lateral arm pain. The pain was refractory to 12 months of conservative therapy. Cardiac workup was negative and cervical spine imaging revealed a C6–7 herniation with neuroforaminal stenosis. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 2020. Studies reporting cervical level, average symptom duration, location of pain, and postoperative pain improvement were included. The patient's atypical symptoms were completely resolved after C6–7 anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty. To our knowledge, this is the first study which reports on the use of arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical angina. The systematic review included 11 articles from 1989–2020 consisting of 1,186 total patients and 109 patients (age range, 36–84 years; 60.7% male) meeting inclusion criteria. Symptom duration range was 2 days to 90 months, with the most common location of pain being localized to the anterior chest wall (66.7% of patients). All patients (100%) had postoperative resolution of their pain symptoms. The most common herniation level was C6–7 (87.3% of patients). We conclude that a broad and multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the diagnosis and management of noncardiac chest pain. When cervical disease is identified as the underlying cause for the angina-like pain, conservative therapy should be sought. Refractory cases should be treated surgically depending on the cervical pathology.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cervical Angina: An Often Overlooked Cause of Noncardiac Chest Pain Jonathan P. Japa, Philip Zitser, Mark Ehioghae, Kevin Yoon, Linus Lee, Shankar Thiru, Addisu Mesfin JBJS Reviews.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Combining pulsed radiofrequency and low-temperature plasma ablation for refractory cervicogenic angina after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report Xianting Cheng, Yifan Wang, Shaofan Yang, Juan Liu, Baishan Wu Frontiers in Pain Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnosis and Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Disorders Presenting as Cardiac, Gastrointestinal, and Other False Pain Syndromes Nolan J. Brown, Cathleen Kuo, Zach Pennington, Angie Zhang, Ashley E. Choi, Andrew K. Chan, Shane Shahrestani, Nicholas E. Bui, Matthew J. Hatter, Gaston Camino-Willhuber, Martin H. Pham, Michael Y. Oh Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(3): 114. CrossRef
Physiotherapy management of a patient with non-cardiac angina: A case report Md Ershad Ali, Md Forhad Hossain, Ehsanur Rahman, Saiba Muhammad Sabrin, Fabiha Alam Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2025; 42: 549. CrossRef
Discussion on the Theoretical System of “Theory, Method, Formula and Technique” of Spinal Manipulation of Emei Injury Department 琪 张 Traditional Chinese Medicine.2024; 13(01): 21. CrossRef
True Angina Pectoris Immediately After Cervical Disc Herniation Surgery for Preoperative Cervical Angina Symptoms: A Case Report Takashi Abe, Takafumi Tanei, Yusuke Nishimura, Ryuta Saito Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Underdiagnosed, Understudied Complexity of Pseudoangina: Should Clinicians Take a Neurosurgical Approach in Diagnosing Unexplained Visceral Pain? Nolan J. Brown, Shane Shahrestani, Elliot H. Choi, Brian V. Lien, Chen Yi Yang, Katelynn Tran, Michael Y. Oh Neurospine.2021; 18(1): 250. CrossRef
First
Prev
