Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

2
results for

"Michael T. Nolte"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Michael T. Nolte"

Original Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures
Neurospine. 2021;18(4):863-870.   Published online December 31, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures
Neurospine. 2021;18(4):863-870.   Published online December 31, 2021
Close
Objective
To assess change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) as predictors for revision lumbar decompression (LD).
Methods
Patients who underwent primary, single or multilevel LD were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized according to whether or not they underwent revision LD within 2 years of the primary procedure. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey and 12-item Veterans RAND physical component score (SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were recorded. Delta PROM scores were evaluated for differences between groups and as a risk factor for a revision LD.
Results
The study included 135 patients, 91 undergoing a primary procedure only and 44 undergoing a primary and revision procedure. Matched patients did not demonstrate any significant differences in demographics or perioperative characteristics. Patients who underwent a revision had a mean time to revision of 7.4 ± 5.7 months. Primary cohort significantly improved for all PROMs (all p < 0.05), while the primary plus revision cohort significantly improved for VAS back, ODI, and PROMIS-PF (all p < 0.05). However, cohorts differed in VAS back and PROMIS-PF (p < 0.05). Delta PROMs were not a significant risk factor for revision except at 6 months for PROMIS-PF (p = 0.024).
Conclusion
LD has been associated with reliable outcomes, but early identification of patients at risk for revision is critical. This study suggests that tools such as PROMIS-PF may serve a role in predicting who is at risk and the 6-month follow-up period may be valuable for counseling patients who are not experiencing improvement.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Outcome Measures in Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Harneet K Cheema, Manraj S Cheema, James Gomes
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between spinal manipulative therapy and lumbar spine reoperation after discectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Robert J. Trager, Jordan A. Gliedt, Collin M. Labak, Clinton J. Daniels, Jeffery A. Dusek
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening patients requiring secondary lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a nationwide sample cohort study
    Hangeul Park, Juhee Lee, Yunhee Choi, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sum Kim, Young-Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Chi Heon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement
    James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Keith R. MacGregor, Eileen Zheng, Vincent P. Federico, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 175: e914.     CrossRef
  • 7,523 View
  • 114 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Personal Health of Spine Surgeons Can Impact Perceptions, Decision-Making and Healthcare Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Worldwide Study
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):313-330.   Published online June 30, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Personal Health of Spine Surgeons Can Impact Perceptions, Decision-Making and Healthcare Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Worldwide Study
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):313-330.   Published online June 30, 2020
Close
Objective
To determine if personal health of spine surgeons worldwide influences perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was performed by distributing a multidimensional survey to spine surgeons worldwide. Questions addressed demographics, impacts and perceptions of COVID-19, and the presence of surgeon comorbidities, which included cancer, cardiac disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, respiratory illness, renal disease, and current tobacco use. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify specific comorbidities that influenced various impact measures.
Results
Across 7 global regions, 36.8% out of 902 respondents reported a comorbidity, of which hypertension (21.9%) and obesity (15.6%) were the most common. Multivariate analysis noted tobacco users were more likely to continue performing elective surgery during the pandemic (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–4.72; p = 0.001) and were less likely to utilize telecommunication (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.86; p = 0.011), whereas those with hypertension were less likely to warn their patients should the surgeon become infected with COVID-19 (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37–0.91; p = 0.017). Clinicians with multiple comorbidities were more likely to cite personal health as a current stressor (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07–1.63; p = 0.009) and perceived their hospital’s management unfavorably (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60–0.91; p = 0.005).
Conclusion
This is the first study to have mapped global variations of personal health of spine surgeons, key in the development for future wellness and patient management initiatives. This study underscored that spine surgeons worldwide are not immune to comorbidities, and their personal health influences various perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide: A One Year Prospective Comparative Study
    Juan N. Barajas, Alexander L. Hornung, Timothy Kuzel, Gary M. Mallow, Grant J. Park, Samuel S. Rudisill, Philip K. Louie, Garrett K. Harada, Michael H. McCarthy, Niccole Germscheid, Jason PY. Cheung, Marko H. Neva, Mohammad El-Sharkawi, Marcelo Valacco, D
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(3): 956.     CrossRef
  • Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database
    Woon Tak Yuh, Jinhee Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Young Rak Kim, Sum Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Young San Ko, Chi Heon Kim, Kentaro Yamada
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(6): e0305128.     CrossRef
  • Experiences and management of physician psychological symptoms during infectious disease outbreaks: a rapid review
    Kirsten M. Fiest, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Karla D. Krewulak, Kara M. Plotnikoff, Laryssa G. Kemp, Joshua Ng-Kamstra, Henry T. Stelfox
    BMC Psychiatry.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 21,618 View
  • 148 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref