Objective The upper lumbar region has distinctive anatomical characteristics that contribute to the challenges of performing discectomy. We introduce far-lateral transforaminal unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) lumbar discectomy for central or paracentral disc herniations in the upper lumbar region.
Methods We conducted retrospective review of the patients who underwent a far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy at our institution from January 2018 to September 2024. The electronic medical records, operative records, and radiologic images of the patients were reviewed.
Results A total of 27 patients underwent far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy for central or paracentral disc herniations in the upper lumbar region. The patient had a mean age of 54.0 ± 13.7 years. Operation was performed at the L1–2 level in 3 patients (11.1%), L2–3 in 9 patients (33.3%), and L3–4 in 15 patients (55.6%). The patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.7 ± 19.3 months. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly decreased from 36.3 ± 6.8 preoperatively to 3.7 ± 3.3 at last follow-up (p < 0.001). The visual analogue scale (VAS) back was significantly decreased from 7.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 0.6 postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001). The VAS leg was significantly decreased from 8.1 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 0.7 postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion The far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy would be a viable surgical option for upper lumbar disc herniations.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages Compared With Open TLIF: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates Sang Hyub Lee, Junghan Seo, Dain Jeong, Sang Youp Han, Dong Hyun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S28. CrossRef
The efficacy and safety of annulus fibrosus suture as adjuvant therapy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wensi Ouyang, Guimei Guo, Yu Sun, Haobo Jiang, Long Chen, Shaofeng Yang Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Nerve Root Herniation Due to Delayed Dural Tear Following Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression With Lumbar Discectomy Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S109. CrossRef
Application of the far-lateral approach in uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based and Delphi consensus approach among Chinese expert opinions Mengchen Yin, Yongpeng Lin, Pengfei Yu, Dong Wang, Fengtao Li, Shiyuan Hao, Kening Sun, Kuankuan Li, Yun Liu, Xin Zhang, Jizheng Li, Mingfei Wang, Junming Ma, Wenlong Yu, Li Xue, Zhilin Li, Guodong Gao, Bo Zhang, Benhui Xu, Jing Feng, Chao Chen, Yiguo Yan Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105994. CrossRef
The influence of the positional relationship between the pedicle and the pars interarticularis on unilateral biportal endoscopy: A retrospective cohort study Shaoning Shen, Tingyuan Lai, Hao Wei, Wangnan Mao, Lianguo Wu, Hanbing Zeng Medicine.2026; 105(12): e47945. CrossRef
Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation Jing Zhang, Zhinan Ren, Lei Yu, Cheng Peng, Yingjie Hao BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Incidence and Risk Factors for 30- and 90-day Reoperations Following Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Hangyu Lee, Limjoon Yoon, Sejin Song, Dain Jeong, Junghan Seo, Sang Youp Han, Bang-Sang Hahn, Jun Young Kim, Jin Seop Hwang, Dong-Geun Lee, Jin-Sung Kim, Dong Chan Lee, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Bilateral–Contralateral Endoscopic Decompression as a Fusion-Deferral Strategy in Upper Lumbar Stenosis: A Structural Rationale and Conditional Framework—A Technical Note with Cases Review Dong Hyun Lee, Sang Yeop Han, Seung Young Jeong, Il-Tae Jang Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(16): 5726. CrossRef
Objective The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF).
Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF.
Results Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p<0.05). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p>0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813).
Conclusion We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Biportal Endoscopic Revision Diskectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Using O-Arm Navigation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video Sang Hyub Lee, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park Operative Neurosurgery.2026; 30(3): 481. CrossRef
A large-scale database comparison of contemporary surgical complications in cervical radiculopathy: Cervical disc replacement versus posterior cervical foraminotomy Nicholas J. Cormas, Ariaz Goudarzi, Ved Vengsarkar, J. Allen Chi, Joyce Wang, Li Jin, Stephen Lockey, Xudong Joshua Li Journal of Orthopaedics.2026; 72: 262. CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions of Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review With Narrative Insights Ryan Wang, Satheeshram Tamilselvan, Ji Soo Ha, Aditya Vedantam, Courtney Rory Goodwin, Nathan Evaniew, Uzondu F. Agochukwu, Konstantinos Margetis, Yoon Ha, Michael Fehlings, Jefferson R. Wilson, Ankit I. Mehta Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for cervicothoracic junction disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial Huaibin Wang, Hui Li, Rushuo Wei, Hao Yan, Ruzhan Yao, Weiqiang Liu, Ling Li Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
No surgical site infections observed after lumbar unilateral biportal endoscopy: a multicenter retrospective series of 1566 patients Aurore Sellier, Joseph Cristini, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Francois Lechanoine, Nicolas Pellet, Jonathan Lebhar, Guillaume Lonjon Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105949. CrossRef
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages Compared With Open TLIF: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates Sang Hyub Lee, Junghan Seo, Dain Jeong, Sang Youp Han, Dong Hyun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S28. CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Biportal Endoscopic Resection of a Cervical Laminar Osteoid Osteoma Adjacent to the Facet Joint: A Case Report Kwan-Su Song, Joon Young Jung Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S102. CrossRef
Nerve Root Herniation Due to Delayed Dural Tear Following Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression With Lumbar Discectomy Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S109. CrossRef
Complications and their prevention in unilateral biportal endoscopy: a systematic review with narrative insights and practical management algorithms Xavier A. Santander, Martin N. Stienen, Stefan Motov, Héctor U. Quintanilla, Elsa González Pérez Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Unilateral biportal endoscopic partial cervical laminectomy and facetectomy: An ex vivo study and case report Hojung Bae, Haebeom Lee, Sanghyun Nam, Youngjin Jeon, Jaemin Jeong Veterinary Surgery.2026; 55(3): 657. CrossRef
Complications in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery–Tubular, Uniportal, and Biportal Endoscopic Surgery (2013–2024) Noah Willett, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl Spine.2026; 51(7): E175. CrossRef
Incidence and Risk Factors for 30- and 90-day Reoperations Following Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Hangyu Lee, Limjoon Yoon, Sejin Song, Dain Jeong, Junghan Seo, Sang Youp Han, Bang-Sang Hahn, Jun Young Kim, Jin Seop Hwang, Dong-Geun Lee, Jin-Sung Kim, Dong Chan Lee, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Abdullah Afridi, Ayesha Zulfiqar, Muhammad Waqar Shahid, Fatima Sajjad, Hamnah Sohail, Fazia Khattak, Sabir Khan, Ayesha Naseem, Alina Batool, Muhammad Muneeb, Savira Khattak, Izhar Ul Haq, Ayesha Shahid, Ayesha Nauman, Marium Nisar, Tanveer Hussain, Ahsa Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression Ryan Wang, Mohammed Rasheed, William Zeng, Alexander T. Hong, Hannah Cho, Syed I. Khalid, Ankit I. Mehta Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Posterior Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Diskectomy: Surgical Techniques and Review of Outcomes Sang Hun Lee, Wesley M. Durand, Micheal Raad, Amit Jain Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2025; 33(18): e1072. CrossRef
Development and validation of a cost-effective three-dimensional-printed cervical spine model for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy training: a prospective educational study from Turkey Bilal Bahadır Akbulut, Elif Ezgi Çenberlitaş, Mustafa Serdar Bölük, Taşkın Yurtseven, Hüseyin Biçeroğlu Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 183. CrossRef
Fluid and thermal dynamics in endoscopic spine surgery: What surgeons need to know Dong Hun Kim, Sang Don Kim, Jin Young Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Jung Woo Hur Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111287. CrossRef
Biportal Endoscopic Techniques for Severe Dural Ossification in Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: Insights From Preoperative Imaging Ji Yeon Kim, Su Yong Choi, Dong Chan Lee, Hyeun Sung Kim, Dong Hwa Heo Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 819. CrossRef
Single-Incision Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for 2-Level Cervical Radiculopathy Florian Wanivenhaus, Christoph Johannes Laux, Sohrab Gollogly, Jin-Sung Kim, Mazda Farshad Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(2): 289. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes between ipsilateral and contralateral inclinatory approaches in unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy JinWoo Jung, Sang-Woo Lee, Donghyun Kim, Young San Ko, Dae-Chul Cho, Sang-Kyu Son, Man-Kyu Park European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
C7–T1 Full-Endoscopic Posterior Foraminotomy and Sequestrectomy Using Navigation Soubach Saravanan, Jean Yves Fournier, Alexandre Simonin Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1168. CrossRef
Objective We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF).
Methods Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan.
Results Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001).
Conclusion Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation.
Sang Hyub Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Hong Kyung Shin, Jeoung Hee Kim, Danbi Park, Chang-Min Ha, Sun-Ho Lee, Dong Ho Kang, Young Hyun Cho, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park
Neurospine 2024;21(1):293-302. Published online January 31, 2024
Objective Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed.
Results A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–1.79; p = 0.336).
Conclusion SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Preoperative radiotherapy combined with surgery versus surgery alone for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a meta-analysis Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for spinal cord surgery Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sum Kim, Young-Rak Kim, Kyung-Tae Kim, Ji-hoon Kim, John M. Rhee, Woo-Young Jo, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park, Chi Heon Kim, Barry Kweh PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0305694. CrossRef
A Complete Facet Resection and Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Enhances Both Gross Total Resection and Motion Preservation for the Cervical Spinal Dumbbell Tumor Sungsoo Bae, Dae-Jean Jo, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Jinuk Kim, Chongman Kim, Jin Hoon Park World Neurosurgery.2024; 192: e486. CrossRef
Objective The cervical spine presents challenges in treating metastatic cervical spinal tumors (MCSTs). Although the efficacy of cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) has been well established, its use in combination with 5.5-mm rods for MCST has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CPS combined with 5.5-mm rods in treating MCST and compare it with that of CPS combined with traditional 3.5-mm rods.
Methods This retrospective study analyzed 58 patients with MCST who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2022. Data included demographics, surgical details, imaging results, numerical rating scale score for neck pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire responses.
Results Preoperative Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores were significantly higher in the 5.5-mm rod group. Greater kyphotic changes in the index vertebra were observed in the 3.5-mm rod group. Neck pain reduction was significantly better in the 5.5-mm rod group.
Conclusion CPS with 5.5-mm rods provides superior biomechanical stability and effectively resists forward bending momentum in posterior MCST fusion surgery. These findings support the use of 5.5-mm rods to enhance surgical outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Anterior Corpectomy Versus Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Spinal Tumor Located in the Cervicothoracic Junction Sun Woo Jang, Hong Kyung Shin, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Danbi Park, Chongman Kim, Jin Hoon Park Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 603. CrossRef
The efficacy of 5.5-mm diameter rods combined with cervical pedicle screws for the treatment of challenging spinal disease in cervicothoracic junction: Is it a game-changer? Younggyu Oh, Subum Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Danbi Park, Chongman Kim, Sun Woo Jang, Jin Hoon Park Medicine.2025; 104(36): e44369. CrossRef
Verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification of finite element analysis results for pedicle screw assemblies under ASTM F1717 flexion and extension testing On Sim, Byeong Cheol Jeong, Chiseung Lee Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Complete Facet Resection and Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Enhances Both Gross Total Resection and Motion Preservation for the Cervical Spinal Dumbbell Tumor Sungsoo Bae, Dae-Jean Jo, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Jinuk Kim, Chongman Kim, Jin Hoon Park World Neurosurgery.2024; 192: e486. CrossRef
Objective Romosozumab is increasingly employed to manage osteoporosis. However, no studies have analyzed its effects on recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of romosozumab compared with teriparatide in managing OVCFs.
Methods The electronic medical records of postmenopausal patients with recent OVCFs who were administered romosozumab or teriparatide for one year from March 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the 2 groups for demographics, radiological outcomes (compression ratio, Cobb angle, and bone mineral density [BMD]), and clinical outcomes (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] for back pain).
Results Fifty-five patients with OVCFs, 32 patients treated with romosozumab and 23 with teriparatide, were included in this study. The change of BMD (g/cm2) values was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.04 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.00 ± 0.08) in the femur total. Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, the change of BMD (g/cm2) values in the lumbar spine was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.12 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.07 ± 0.06) in the lumbar spine. The decrease in NRS was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the romosozumab (6.6 ± 2.0) than in the teriparatide group (5.5 ± 2.1). However, there was no significant difference in radiologic outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion Our findings suggest that romosozumab may be more effective than teriparatide in treating OVCFs in postmenopausal females, particularly in improving BMD and reducing back pain as measured by NRS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Romosozumab mitigates progression from radiological to symptomatic adjacent-level fractures compared to teriparatide Wei-Han Kao, Yi-Shan Yang, Chen-Ling Lan, Wen-Cheng Lo, Yung-Hsiao Chiang, Jiann-Her Lin Osteoporosis International.2026; 37(2): 491. CrossRef
Comparative Radiologic Outcomes of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Jun-Seok Lee, Geon-U Kim, Ho-Young Jung, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Sangjun Park, Young-Yul Kim, Hyung-Youl Park Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(6): 2349. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Posterior Long-Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Study Jong-Hwan Hong, Jong-Hoon Jung, Ji-Ho Jung, Moon-Soo Han, Jung-Kil Lee World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123433. CrossRef
Off-label use of teriparatide for the treatment of a vertebral burst fracture in a young patient: A case report and literature review Tiziano Villa, Vincenzo Zottola, Carlo Mariani, Alberto Borgonovo, Luciano Redenti Trauma Case Reports.2025; 55: 101127. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes Hyun Woong Mun, Jong Joo Lee, Hyun Chul Shin, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Woo Kim, Jae Keun Oh Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 69. CrossRef
A Commentary on “Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes” Toshihiko Inui Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 78. CrossRef
Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporotic Drugs in Preventing Periprosthetic Bone Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta‐Analysis Yi Tang, Zhaokai Jin, Yichen Lu, Lei Chen, Shuaijie Lv, Taotao Xu, Peijian Tong, Guoqian Chen Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(10): 2344. CrossRef
Commentary on “Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs” Chao-Hung Kuo Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 44. CrossRef
Comparison of osteoanabolic agents (teriparatide and romosozumab) with bisphosphonates in prevention of subsequent vertebral fractures in patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral fracture for 12 months: An observational cohort study Keishi Maruo, Tomoyuki Kusukawa, Masakazu Toi, Tetsuto Yamaura, Masaru Hatano, Hayato Oishi, Kazuma Nagao, Fumihiro Arizumi, Kazuya Kishima, Norichika Yoshie, Toshiya Tachibana Bone Reports.2024; 21: 101762. CrossRef
Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacral Fracture Following Lumbosacral Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years: A Case–Control Study Sang Hyub Lee, Dong-Hwan Kim, Jin Hoon Park, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Dong Ho Kang World Neurosurgery.2024; 191: e633. CrossRef
Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major concern related to anterior cervical decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We propose a management algorithm for CSF leakage following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL involving the use of pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL and were managed with the proposed algorithm between March 2018 and July 2022. The proposed management algorithm for CSF leakage by pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage was as follows. On exposure of the arachnoid membrane with or without CSF leakage, a dural sealant patch was applied to manage the dural defect. In case of persistent CSF leakage despite application of the dural sealant patch, patients underwent pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage.
Results Fifty-one patients were included in the study. CSF leakage occurred in 14 patients. Of these 14 patients, 9 patients underwent lumbar drain insertion according to the proposed management algorithm. Successful resolution of CSF leakage was observed in 8 of the 9 patients who underwent lumbar drainage. All patients were encouraged to ambulate without concern of CSF overdrainage due to gravity, because it could be avoided with pump-regulated volumetric continuous CSF drainage. Therefore, complications associated with absolute bed rest or CSF overdrainage were not observed.
Conclusion The proposed management algorithm with pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage showed safety and efficacy for management of CSF leakage following anterior decompression and fusion for OPLL.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhanced indirect sealing of cerebrospinal fluid leaks in anterior cervical surgery using plate mechanical pressure Dong Liu, Leisheng Wang, Xiaoguang Fan Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2026; 19(1): 102196. CrossRef
Delayed myelopathy caused by cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst following decompression for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum: a case report and literature review Shuxin Zheng, Jianzhi Wang, Junhu Li, Linnan Wang, Lei Wang, Yueming Song BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
External lumbar drain for fistula leakage in posterior fossa and spinal surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis Luciano Falcão, João Pedro Fernandes Gonçalves, Maianna Sancho do Lago, Maria Clara Nery Cardoso, Judson Carlos S. N. Júnior, Lucas Piason, Jean G. de Oliveira, José Carlos Esteves Veiga Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Dural Tear and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Evolving Repair Techniques Jae Jun Yang, Jiwon Park, Jong-Beom Park, Suo Kim Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(23): 8478. CrossRef
Review/Perspective: Incidence and treatment of CSF leaks/dural tears (DT) occurring during anterior cervical surgery Nancy E. Epstein, Marc A. Agulnick Surgical Neurology International.2024; 15: 401. CrossRef
The drainage volume control by elevation of drainage height versus head down tilt in supine position for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery Ping Dong, Jing Huang, Xu Deng, Hongli Yang, Chunmei Luo BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
First
Prev
