Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

9
results for

"Young Baeg Kim"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Young Baeg Kim"

Case Reports

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(2):67-70.   Published online June 30, 2016
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(2):67-70.   Published online June 30, 2016
Close

Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) usually results in various problems in the brain. But it can be presented as a myelopathy, which may make early diagnosis and management to be difficult. We recently experienced a case of cervical myelopathy caused by intracranial dAVF. A 60-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of gait disturbance due to a progressive weakness of both legs. Neurological examination revealed spastic paraparesis (grade IV) and Babinski sign on both sides. Magnetic resonance imaging showed serpentine vascular signal voids at C2-T1 on T2-weighted image with increased signal intensity and swelling of spinal cord at C1-C4. We performed a brain computed tomography angiography and found intracranial dAVF with multiple arteriovenous shunts. Venous drainages were noted at tentorial veins and cervical perimedullary veins. After Onyx embolization, the patient showed gradual improvement in motor power and gait disturbance. The venous drainage pattern is a well-known prognostic factor of dAVF. In our case, the intracranial dAVF drained to spinal perimedullary vein, which seemed to result in the ischemic myelopathy. Although it is rare condition, it sometimes can cause serious complications. Therefore, we should keep in mind the possibility of intracranial dAVF when a patient presents myelopathy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Delayed Pontomesencephalic and Cervical Cord Venous Drainage Followed by Contralateral Carotid-Cavernous Fistula after Craniofacial Fractures: A Case Report
    Steven Tandean, Harsan Harsan, Andre Marolop Pangihutan Siahaan, Harley Septian, Alexander Josethang
    Neurointervention.2024; 19(3): 185.     CrossRef
  • Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Presenting as Symmetric Lesions in the Internal Capsule on Imaging Studies
    Daihui Zhang, Kuopeng Liang, Juntao Yin, Lingtao Tang, Xiaoyi Yang, Zhihong Yang, Xingliang Li
    The Neurologist.2023; 28(5): 304.     CrossRef
  • Watch brain circulation in unexplained progressive myelopathy: a review of Cognard type V arterio-venous fistulas
    Amedeo De Grado, Chiara Manfredi, Agostino Brugnera, Elisabetta Groppo, Luca Valvassori, Federica Cencini, Alessandra Erbetta, Elisa Ciceri, Rosanna Lerario, Alberto Priori, Emma Scelzo
    Neurological Sciences.2023; 44(10): 3457.     CrossRef
  • Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary venous drainage–associated cervical myelopathy: illustrative case
    Sergi Cobos Codina, Luis Miguel Bernal García, José Antonio Rodríguez Sánchez, Tania Gavilán Iglesias, Luis Fernández de Alarcón
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Traumatic carotid‑cavernous fistula with perimedullary venous drainage and delayed myelopathy: A case report
    Chun-Long Ding, Chun-Lei Zhang, Feng Hua, Shao-Dong Xi, Qin-Wei Zhou, Hui-Jun Wang, Jun-Jie Chen, Jie Qiu
    Medicine International.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Type V Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Supplied by the Artery of Wollschlaeger and Wollschlaeger Causing Cervical Myelopathy and Quadriparesis
    Svetlana Kvint, Preethi Ramchand, Mougnyan Cox, Neda I. Sedora-Roman, Linda Bagley, Donald M. O'Rourke, Robert W. Hurst, Omar A. Choudhri
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 137: 55.     CrossRef
  • Recurring Thalamic Symptoms Due to Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: Report of Unusual Case and Treatment Outcome
    Selvadasan Vinayagamani, Santhosh Kumar Kannath, Jayadevan Enakshy Rajan
    World Neurosurgery.2018; 118: 9.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula with Acute Worsening After Steroid Administration
    Sunfu Zhang, Hao Liu, Jin Li
    World Neurosurgery.2018; 120: 328.     CrossRef
  • 12,874 View
  • 142 Download
  • 8 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Two Cases of Klippel-Feil Syndrome with Cervical Myelopathy Successfully Treated by Simple Decompression without Fixation
Korean J Spine. 2015;12(3):225-229.   Published online September 30, 2015
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Two Cases of Klippel-Feil Syndrome with Cervical Myelopathy Successfully Treated by Simple Decompression without Fixation
Korean J Spine. 2015;12(3):225-229.   Published online September 30, 2015
Close

Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is a congenital developmental disorder of cervical spine, showing short neck with restricted neck motion, low hairline, and high thoracic cage due to multilevel cervical fusion. Radiculopathy or myelopathy can be accompanied. There were 2 patients who were diagnosed as KFS with exhibited radiological and physical characteristics. Both patients had stenosis and cord compression at C1 level due to anterior displacement of C1 posterior arch secondary to kyphotic deformity of upper cervical spine, which has been usually indicative to craniocervical fixation. One patient was referred due to quadriparesis detected after surgery for aortic arch aneurysmal dilatation. The other patient was referred to us due to paraparesis and radiating pain in all extremities developed during gynecological examinations. Decompressive C1 laminectomy was done for one patient and additional suboccipital craniectomy for the other. No craniocervical fixation was done because there was no spinal instability. Motor power improved immediately after the operation in both patients. Motor functions and spinal stability were well preserved in both patients for 2 years. In KFS patients with myelopathy at the C1 level without C1-2 instability, a favorable outcome could be achieved by a simple decompression without spinal fixation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Transmandibular Cervical Corpectomy for Persistent Spinal Cord Compression in a Patient With Klippel-Feil Syndrome: A Technical Note and Systematic Review
    James W. Nie, Morteza Sadeh, Zayed Almadidy, Nicholas Callahan, Sergey Neckrysh
    Operative Neurosurgery.2023; 25(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • Congenital Fusion of Dens to T3 Vertebra in Klippel-Feil Syndrome
    Terence Verla, Marc Prablek, Alexander E. Ropper, David S. Xu, Michael Raber
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 143: 18.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and management of pain in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome: analysis of a global patient-reported registry
    Kishan Patel, Hardy Evans, Samuel Sommaruga, Pia Vayssiere, Tariq Qureshi, Luis Kolb, Michael G. Fehlings, Joseph S. Cheng, Enrico Tessitore, Karl Schaller, Aria Nouri
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(4): 578.     CrossRef
  • Sinostosis cervical asociada a síndromes de Down y de Schneider. Implicaciones clínicas y médico-legales a propósito de un caso autópsico
    José Manuel Arredondo Diaz, José Aso Escario, Jesús Obon, Cristina Sebastián Sebastián, Alberto Aso Vizan, José-Vicente Martínez Quiñones
    Revista Española de Medicina Legal.2018; 44(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • Cervical synostosis associated with Down's syndrome and Schneider syndrome. Clinical and medico-legal implications of an autopsy case
    José Manuel Arredondo Diaz, José Aso Escario, Jesús Obon, Cristina Sebastián Sebastián, Alberto Aso Vizan, José-Vicente Martínez Quiñones
    Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine.2018; 44(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • 13,307 View
  • 91 Download
  • 5 Crossref

Clinical Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a New Cage for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(3):145-151.   Published online September 30, 2014
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a New Cage for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(3):145-151.   Published online September 30, 2014
Close
Objective

In Korea, direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) was started since 2011, using standard cage (6° lordotic angle, 18mm width). Recently, a new wider cage with higher lordotic angle (12°, 22mm) was introduced. The aim of our study is to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the two cage types.

Methods

We selected patients underwent DLIF, 125 cases used standard cages (standard group) and 38 cases used new cages (wide group). We followed them up for more than 6 months, and their radiological and clinical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. For radiologic outcomes, lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), segmental lordoic angle (SLA), disc angle (DA), foraminal height change (FH), subsidence and intraoperative endplate destruction (iED) were checked. Clinical outcomes were compared using visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score and complications.

Results

LLA and SLA showed no significant changes postoperatively in both groups. DA showed significant increase after surgery in the wide group (p<0.05), but not in the standard group. Subsidence was significantly lower in the wide group (p<0.05). There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Additional posterior decompression was done more frequently in the wide group. Postoperative change of foraminal height was significantly lower in the wide group (p<0.05). The iED was observed more frequently in the wide group (p<0.05) especially at the anterior edge of cage.

Conclusion

The new type of cage seems to result in more DA and less subsidence. But indirect foraminal decompression seems to be less effective than standard cage. Intraoperative endplate destruction occurs more frequently due to a steeper lordotic angle of the new cage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Experimental quantification of resistance to subsidence conferred by endplate-specific expandable implants in anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Landyn Froberg, Andrew Zhang, James Robinson, Mason Favre, Milan Mody, Giovanni F. Solitro
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The iLLIF score: a predictive success scoring system for indirect decompression in lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Narat Virojanawat, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Surachat Jaroenwareekul, Worawat Limthongkul, Vit Kotheeranurak, Weerasak Singhatanadgige
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative coronal magnetic resonance imaging: a critical evaluation of the Kambin’s triangle for the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure
    Koopong Siribumrungwong, Bunyaporn Wuttiworawanit, Punnawit Pinitchanon, Chanon Chiarnpattanodom, Thongchai Suntharapa
    Asian Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimization of Thermal, Mechanical, Biodegradation, and Shape Memory Properties in 4D‐Printed PLA/PCL Blends for Spinal Cages
    Meltem Eryildiz, Aleyna Karakus, Mehmet Demirci, Ozge Altintas Kadirhan, Mihrigul Eksi Altan
    Polymers for Advanced Technologies.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Design, FEA and experimental validation of 3D-printed PLA/PCL intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion
    Meltem Eryildiz, Ozge Altintas Kadirhan, Mehmet Demirci, Aleyna Karakus, Mihrigul Eksi Altan
    Materials Testing.2025; 67(6): 1014.     CrossRef
  • Fabrication and characterization of 4D-printed graphene oxide-reinforced PLA/PCL spinal cages for minimally invasive fusion surgery
    Meltem Eryildiz, Ozge Altintas Kadirhan, Mehmet Demirci, Aleyna Karakus, Mihrigul Eksi Altan
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing.2025; 10(11): 9535.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Cages With Different Sized Windows
    Chengkun Zhao, Shijie Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Hegang Niu, Yun Cao, Hui Tao, Cailiang Shen, Yinshun Zhang
    Spine.2025; 50(22): 1556.     CrossRef
  • Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system
    Khuzaima Rangwalla, Anna Filley, Ashraf El Naga, David Gendelberg, Avionna Baldwin, Ali Maziad, Ayush Arora, Aboubacar Wague, Jennifer O’Donnell, Timothy Chryssikos, Rafid Kasir, Jay Shah, Alekos Theologis, Lee Tan, Praveen Mummaneni, Todd Alamin, Sigurd
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(5): 1762.     CrossRef
  • Defining cage subsidence in anterior, oblique, and lateral lumbar spine fusion approaches: a systematic review of the literature
    Alexander O. Aguirre, Mohamed A. R. Soliman, Cathleen C. Kuo, Andrea Kassay, Gaganjot Parmar, Marissa D. Kruk, Esteban Quiceno, Asham Khan, Jaims Lim, Ryan M. Hess, Jeffrey P. Mullin, John Pollina
    Neurosurgical Review.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors that influence the results of indirect decompression employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Andrey E Bokov, Svetlana Y Kalinina, Mingiyan I Khaltyrov, Alexandr P Saifullin, Anatoliy A Bulkin
    World Journal of Orthopedics.2024; 15(8): 734.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cage Material and Size on Fusion Rate and Subsidence Following Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ki-Han You, Samuel K. Cho, Jae-Yeun Hwang, Sun-Ho Cha, Min-Seok Kang, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Park
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 973.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Hounsfield Unit in Intraoperative Endplate Violation and Delayed Cage Subsidence with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Hao Wu, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Teng Zhang, Zhi Shan, Xuyang Zhang, Junhui Liu, Shunwu Fan, Fengdong Zhao
    Global Spine Journal.2023; 13(7): 1829.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Vertebral Endplate Fractures after Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wook Tae Park, In Ha Woo, Sung Jin Park, Gun Woo Lee
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2023; 15(5): 809.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Cage Subsidence in Minimally Invasive Lateral Corpectomy for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
    Shuhei Iwata, Toshiaki Kotani, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Yasushi Iijima, Shun Okuwaki, Shuhei Ohyama, Satoshi Maki, Yawara Eguchi, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masahiro Inoue, Tsutomu Akazawa, Shohei Minami, Seiji Ohtori
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2023; 7(4): 356.     CrossRef
  • Topology Optimization of Spinal Cage Designs for Improved Stress Distribution and Bone Graft Window
    Meltem ERYILDIZ
    Sakarya University Journal of Science.2023; 27(5): 1046.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective Case Series of Porous Titanium Cages in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Assessing Subsidence, Fusion and Functional Outcomes
    Joseph Maalouly, Raghad Barri, John Choi
    Open Journal of Orthopedics.2023; 13(04): 147.     CrossRef
  • Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Hao Wu, Zhi Shan, Fengdong Zhao, Jason Pui Yin Cheung
    Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2022; 480(1): 163.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Scoliosis
    Stuart Changoor, Michael J. Faloon, Conor J. Dunn, Nikhil Sahai, Kimona Issa, Jeffrey Moore, Kumar Sinha, Ki Soo Hwang, Arash Emami
    Orthopedics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors for second-stage posterior direct decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of five hundred fifty-seven patients in the past five years
    Jun Li, Tian-zhen Xu, Ning Zhang, Qi-xin Chen, Fang-cai Li
    International Orthopaedics.2022; 46(5): 1101.     CrossRef
  • Effects of preoperative sagittal spinal imbalance on pain after lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Akihiko Hiyama, Hiroyuki Katoh, Daisuke Sakai, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pear-Shaped Disk as a Risk Factor for Intraoperative End Plate Injury in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Tenghui Ge, Zhongning Xu, Jingye Wu, Yuqing Sun
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 165: e43.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Laterally Placed Expandable versus Static Interbody Spacers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study
    Yan Michael Li, Richard Francis Frisch, Zheng Huang, James Edward Towner, Yan Icy Li, Amber Lynn Edsall, Charles Ledonio
    Asian Spine Journal.2021; 15(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Transumbilical Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and Preliminary Case Series
    Junseok Bae, Shin-Jae Kim, Sang-Ho Lee, Youngsik Bae, Sang Hyeop Jeon
    Neurospine.2021; 18(2): 399.     CrossRef
  • Histological and Morphometric Changes in the Femoral Nerve During Lateral Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine: Experimental Study
    Tatiana N. Varsegova, Olga V. Diuriagina, Nikolai I. Antonov, Sergey O. Ryabykh
    Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia.2021; 27(4): 82.     CrossRef
  • Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Austin Q. Nguyen, Jackson P. Harvey, Krishn Khanna, Bryce A. Basques, Garrett K. Harada, Frank M. Phillips, Kern Singh, Christopher Dewald, Howard S. An, Matthew W Colman
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2021; 35(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Development of a novel geometrically-parametric patient-specific finite element model to investigate the effects of the lumbar lordosis angle on fusion surgery
    Mohammad Nikkhoo, Zahra Khoz, Chih-Hsiu Cheng, Chi-Chien Niu, Marwan El-Rich, Kinda Khalaf
    Journal of Biomechanics.2020; 102: 109722.     CrossRef
  • Indirect Decompression Failure After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Reported Failures and Predictive Factors: Systematic Review
    Sertac Kirnaz, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Jiaao Gu, Christoph Wipplinger, Ibrahim Hussain, Joshua Adjei, Eliana Kim, Franziska Anna Schmidt, Taylor Wong, Robert Nick Hernandez, Roger Härtl
    Global Spine Journal.2020; 10(2_suppl): 8S.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Yan Michael Li, Richard F. Frisch, Zheng Huang, James Towner, Yan Icy Li, Samantha Greeley, Charles Ledonio
    The Open Orthopaedics Journal.2020; 14(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of the need for laminectomy after indirect decompression via initial anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Daehyun Park, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Ratnesh Mehra, Yonguk Kwon, Sungtae Kim, Hui Bing Ruan, Dean Chou
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(6): 781.     CrossRef
  • Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression
    Kai-Zheong Lim, Christopher Daly, Jessica Brown, Tony Goldschlager
    Global Spine Journal.2019; 9(6): 575.     CrossRef
  • Subsidence Rates After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Mohamed Macki, Sharath Kumar Anand, Ashwin Surapaneni, Paul Park, Victor Chang
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 122: 599.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative complications associated with minimally invasive surgery of oblique lumbar interbody fusions for degenerative lumbar diseases in 113 patients
    Chao Liu, Jian Wang, Yue Zhou
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2019; 184: 105381.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cage in Radiological Differences between Direct and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Techniques
    Myeong Jin Ko, Seung Won Park, Young Baeg Kim
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2019; 62(4): 432.     CrossRef
  • Neural decompression in challenging cases: advantages and disadvantages
    Franziska A. Schmidt, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Louis Chang, Sertac Kirnaz, Christoph Wipplinger, Roger Härtl
    Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
    Akihiko Hiyama, Hiroyuki Katoh, Daisuke Sakai, Masato Sato, Masahiro Tanaka, Masahiko Watanabe
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion cages with various lordotic angles: a finite element study
    Zhenjun Zhang, Guy R. Fogel, Zhenhua Liao, Yitao Sun, Weiqiang Liu
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering.2018; 21(3): 247.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Cage Dimensions, Positioning, and Side of Approach in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Marjan Alimi, Gernot Lang, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Moritz Perrech, Connor Berlin, Christoph P. Hofstetter, Yu Moriguchi, Eric Elowitz, Roger Härtl
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2018; 31(1): E42.     CrossRef
  • Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Surgery Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Chao Liu, Jian Wang
    World Neurosurgery.2018; 120: e88.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study
    Zhenjun Zhang, Guy R. Fogel, Zhenhua Liao, Yitao Sun, Xuejun Sun, Weiqiang Liu
    Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering.2018; 29(4): 485.     CrossRef
  • Potential and Limitations of Neural Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion—A Systematic Review
    Gernot Lang, Moritz Perrech, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Ibrahim Hussain, Brenton Pennicooke, Farah Maryam, Mauricio J. Avila, Roger Härtl
    World Neurosurgery.2017; 101: 99.     CrossRef
  • Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates
    Fady Y. Hijji, Ankur S. Narain, Daniel D. Bohl, Junyoung Ahn, William W. Long, Jacob V. DiBattista, Krishna T. Kudaravalli, Kern Singh
    The Spine Journal.2017; 17(10): 1412.     CrossRef
  • Elimination of Subsidence with 26-mm-Wide Cages in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Gernot Lang, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Lena Gandevia, Ibrahim Hussain, Jonathan Nakhla, Micaella Zubkov, Roger Härtl
    World Neurosurgery.2017; 104: 644.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Sagittal Balance on Risk of Falling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Combined with Posterior Surgery
    Byung Ho Lee, Jae-Ho Yang, Hak-Sun Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Hwan-Mo Lee, Jin-Oh Park, Seong-Hwan Moon
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(6): 1177.     CrossRef
  • Results of surgical treatment for lumbar spine segmental instability
    N. A. Konovalov, A. G. Nazarenko, A. V. Krut'ko, D. L. Glukhikh, P. Durni, M. Duris, O. Korol', D. S. Asyutin, A. V. Solenkova, M. A. Martynova
    Voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N.N. Burdenko.2017; 81(6): 69.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Surgical Technique and Review
    Jaewan Soh, Jae Chul Lee
    Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2016; 23(4): 262.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Surgical Technique and Review
    Jaewan Soh, Jae Chul Lee
    Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2016; 23(4): 262.     CrossRef
  • Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity
    Kevin Phan, Prashanth J. Rao, Daniel B. Scherman, Gordon Dandie, Ralph J. Mobbs
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2015; 22(11): 1714.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature
    Jacob R. Joseph, Brandon W. Smith, Frank La Marca, Paul Park
    Neurosurgical Focus.2015; 39(4): E4.     CrossRef
  • 12,022 View
  • 140 Download
  • 48 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Unusual Clinical Presentations of Cervical or Lumbar Dorsal Ramus Syndrome
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(2):57-61.   Published online June 30, 2014
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Unusual Clinical Presentations of Cervical or Lumbar Dorsal Ramus Syndrome
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(2):57-61.   Published online June 30, 2014
Close
Objective

Patients with cervical (CDRS) or lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome (LDRS) are characterized by neck or low back pain with referred pain to upper or lower extremities. However, we experienced some CDRS or LDRS patients with unusual motor or bladder symptoms. We analyzed and reviewed literatures on the unusual symptoms identified in patients with CDRS or LDRS.

Methods

This study included patients with unusual symptoms and no disorders of spine and central nervous system, a total of 206 CDRS/LDRS patients over the past 3 years. We diagnosed by using double diagnostic blocks for medial branches of dorsal rami of cervical or lumbar spine with 1% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine for each block with an interval of more than 1 week between the blocks. Greater than 80% reduction of the symptoms, including unusual symptoms, was considered as a positive response. The patients with a positive response were treated with radiofrequencyneurotomy.

Results

The number of patients diagnosed with CDRS and LDRS was 86 and 120, respectively. Nine patients (10.5%) in the CDRS group had unusual symptoms, including 4 patients with motor weakness of the arm, 3 patients with tremors, and rotatory torticollis in 2 patients. Ten patients (8.3%) in the LDRS group showed unusual symptoms, including 7 patients with motor weakness of leg, 2 patients with leg tremor, and urinary incontinence in 1 patient. All the unusual symptoms combined with CDRS or LDRS were resolved after treatment.

Conclusion

It seems that the clinical presentationssuch as motor weakness, tremor, urinary incontinence without any other etiologic origin need to be checked for unusual symptoms of CDRS or LDRS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Anatomical study and clinical significance of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve of the lumbar spine
    Zhenfeng Zhang, Jing Liu, Yejie Xu, Zeyan Chen, Shiwen Luo, Xin Zhang, Guoliang Wang, Liang Cheng
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anatomy, Causes, and Treatments of Dorsal Ramus Compression Syndromes: A Review
    Grayson Baden
    The Spine Scholar.2018; 2(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of 2-stage Treatment for Cervical Dorsal Rami Entrapment Syndrome
    Qi Li, Jing-Wu Wang, Bing-Fang Zeng, Yi-Ming Cai, Chang-Qing Zhang
    The Neurologist.2017; 22(5): 157.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Lumbar Segmental Stabilization Exercises and Breathing Exercises on Segmental Stabilization in Lumbar Instability Patients
    Sung Rae Yang, Young Mi Kim, Sun Ja Park, Cheol Yong Kim
    The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy.2017; 29(5): 234.     CrossRef
  • 11,273 View
  • 82 Download
  • 4 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Long Term Effect on Adjacent Segment Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(1):1-6.   Published online March 31, 2014
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Long Term Effect on Adjacent Segment Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(1):1-6.   Published online March 31, 2014
Close
Objective

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) is a motion-preserving surgical technique. The objective was to determine whether PCF alter cervical motion as a long-term influence.

Methods

Thirty one patients who followed up more than 36 months after PCF for cervical radiculopathy from January 2004 to September 2008 were enrolled in this study. The range of motion (ROM) of whole cervical spine, the operated segment, the cranial and the caudal adjacent segment were obtained. The clinical result and the change of ROMs were compared with those in the patients performed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) during the same period.

Results

In PCF group, the ROM of whole cervical spine had no significant difference in statistically at preoperative and last follow up. The operated segment ROM was significantly decreased from 11.02±5.72 to 8.82±6.65 (p<0.05). The ROM of cranial adjacent segment was slightly increased from 10.42±5.13 to 11.02±5.41 and the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was decreased from 9.44±6.26 to 8.73±5.92, however these data were not meaningful statistically. In ACDF group, the operated ROM was decreased and unlike in PCF group, especially the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was increased from 9.39±4.21 to 11.33±5.07 (p<0.01).

Conclusion

As part of the long-term effects of PCF on cervical motion, the operated segment motions decreased but were preserved after PCF. However, unlikely after ACDF, the ROMs of the adjacent segment did not increase after PCF. PCF, by maintaining the motion of the operated segment, imposes less stress on the adjacent segments. This may be one of its advantages.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy for Cervical Disc Hernia With Unilateral Radiculopathy
    Idris Gurpinar, Mehmet Yigit Akgun, Furkan Almas, Ozkan Ates
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 149.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of cTDR and Fusion Surgery on Adjacent Level Strain
    Pierce D. Nunley, John A. Hipp, Seth C. Coomer, Amy A. Claeson, Trevor F. Grieco, Richard D. Guyer
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(4): 180.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating Three-Dimensional Navigation versus Conventional Fluoroscopy for Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: An Exploratory Cohort Comparison
    Christian Blume, Andrej Bitter, Guido Wapenhans, Patrick Weidle, Kerstin Jütten, Miguel Pishnamaz, Alexander Romagna, Ulf Bertram, Christian Andreas Mueller, Hans Clusmann, Tobias Philip Schmidt
    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current role and future perspectives of endoscopic spine surgery: a narrative review
    Hyung-Rae Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2025; 68(8): 528.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Ji Uk Choi, Jae Min Park, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Medicina.2024; 60(9): 1496.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Open Microscopic and Biportal Endoscopic Approaches in Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
    Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Min Park, In-Hee Kim, Jun-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 164.     CrossRef
  • Foraminal Restenosis After Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyeong-Joo Lee, Jae Hwan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Jun Yang, Choon Sung Lee, Sehan Park
    Global Spine Journal.2023; 13(8): 2357.     CrossRef
  • Posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy for Cervical Brachialgia: the FORVAD RCT
    Simon Thomson, Gemma Ainsworth, Senthil Selvanathan, Rachel Kelly, Howard Collier, Ruben Mujica-Mota, Rebecca Talbot, Sarah Tess Brown, Julie Croft, Nikki Rousseau, Ruchi Higham, Yahia Al-Tamimi, Neil Buxton, Nicholas Carleton-Bland, Martin Gledhill, Vict
    Health Technology Assessment.2023; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andrew Platt, Richard G. Fessler, Vincent C. Traynelis, John E. O’Toole
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(7): 1573.     CrossRef
  • Anterior or posterior approach in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy; neurosurgeons’ preference in the Netherlands
    Anne E.H. Broekema, Rob J.M. Groen, Erzsi Tegzess, Michiel F. Reneman, Remko Soer, Jos M.A. Kuijlen
    Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2021; 23: 100930.     CrossRef
  • Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: What does the future hold?
    R. Misra, N.K. Rath
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2021; 22: 101609.     CrossRef
  • Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy
    Sanjay Bhatia, Nathaniel P. Brooks
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2020; 31(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Expanding the horizons of minimally invasive spine surgery
    ArvindG Kulkarni, TusharS Kunder, Swaroop Das, Sandeep Tapashetti
    Indian Spine Journal.2020; 3(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis
    Wenguang Fang, Lijun Huang, Feng Feng, Bu Yang, Lei He, Guizhong Du, Peigen Xie, Zihao Chen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent Segmental Disease after Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Hyun Jun Kim, Min Soo Kang, Sang Ho Lee, Chan Hong Park, Seok Won Chung, Yong Hwan Shin, Shin Young Lee, Eun Soo Park
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2020; 63(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes After Microscopic Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy with a Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up
    Seong Son, Woo Kyung Kim, Sang Gu Lee, Yong Ahn
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 122: e67.     CrossRef
  • Does the Neck Pain, Function, or Range of Motion Differ After Anterior Cervical Fusion, Cervical Disc Replacement, and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy?
    Guang-Xun Lin, Gang Rui, Sagar Sharma, Vit Kotheeranurak, Tsz-King Suen, Jin-Sung Kim
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 129: e485.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Current Trends in Treatment of Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy
    Jung K. Mok, Evan D. Sheha, Andre M. Samuel, Steven J. McAnany, Avani S. Vaishnav, Todd J. Albert, Catherine Himo Gang, Sheeraz Qureshi
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2019; 32(5): E241.     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality-Based Evaluation of Surgical Planning and Outcome of Monosegmental, Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
    Samer Zawy Alsofy, Ralf Stroop, Ivo Fusek, Heinz Welzel Saravia, Ioanna Sakellaropoulou, Murat Yavuz, Christian Ewelt, Makoto Nakamura, Thomas Fortmann
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 129: e857.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy
    Nikhil Sahai, Stuart Changoor, Conor J. Dunn, Kumar Sinha, Ki Soo Hwang, Michael Faloon, Arash Emami
    Spine.2019; 44(24): 1731.     CrossRef
  • UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE
    Grant D. Shifflett, Sravisht Iyer, Peter B. Derman, Philip K. Louie, Howard S. An
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2018; 2(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study
    Conor Dunn, Jeffrey Moore, Nikhil Sahai, Kimona Issa, Michael Faloon, Kumar Sinha, Ki Soo Hwang, Arash Emami
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2018; 29(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    Ivo Peto, Christian Scheiwe, Evangelos Kogias, Ulrich Hubbe
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2017; 30(10): E1419.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review
    Wei‐jun Liu, Ling Hu, Po‐Hsin Chou, Jun‐wen Wang, Wu‐sheng Kan
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2016; 8(4): 425.     CrossRef
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of brachialgia: the Leeds spinal unit experience (2008–2013)
    Senthil K. Selvanathan, Chris Beagrie, Simon Thomson, Rob Corns, Kenan Deniz, Chris Derham, Gerry Towns, Jake Timothy, Deb Pal
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2015; 157(9): 1595.     CrossRef
  • Guideline for Surgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy in Cervical Spondylosis and Disc Hernia
    Toshihiko Inui, Nobuyuki Shimokawa, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Izumi Koyanagi
    Spinal Surgery.2015; 29(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • 11,506 View
  • 93 Download
  • 26 Crossref

Original Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Dynamic Stabilization with an Interspinous Process Device (the Wallis System) for Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Korean J Spine. 2008;5(4):258-263.
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Dynamic Stabilization with an Interspinous Process Device (the Wallis System) for Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Korean J Spine. 2008;5(4):258-263.
Close
OBJECTIVE
We used an interspinous process device, the Wallis system, to treat patients with disc disease or lumbar spinal stenosis and retrospectively assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes.
METHOD
The patients were divided into two groups, one with herniated disc disease(HDD) and the other with lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS). Nineteen patients and fourteen patients were enrolled in the HDD and the LSS group, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative pain and activities of daily living(ADL) were assessed in each group. The anterior, posterior disc height and height of the neural foramen were measured. The degree of flexion, extension and lateral flexion were measured.
RESULTS
Both groups improved in pain and ADL after surgery. There were no significant changes in anterior, posterior disc height and height of the neural foramen after the operation in both groups. The change in coronal angle was statistically significant in the entire patient population. The kyphotic angle on the flexion lateral film was 6.1+/-4.1degrees preoperatively and 6.0+/-3.8degrees postoperatively in the entire patient population. Although it was not statistically significant, the kyphotic angle tended to decrease in the HDD group. The lordotic angle was 15.9+/-5.5degrees preoperatively and 13.5+/-6.3degrees postoperatively in overall patient population(from 15.5+/-3.9degrees to 14.0+/-2.7degrees in the HDD group and from 16.0+/-5.9degrees to 13.4+/-6.8degrees in the LSS group). The lordotic angle was significantly decreased in the LSS group.
CONCLUSIONS
Interspinous process devices can induce favorable motion changes on lumbar motion such as decreasing tendency of flexion in the HDD group and decreasing tendency of extension in the LSS group. It suggests that interspinous devices may act as dynamic stabilizers in patients with degenerative disc disease and lumbar spinal stenosis.
  • 3,904 View
  • 25 Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Significance of Anterior Support in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: Single Stage Interbody Fusion with Transpedicular Screw Fixation Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation with Lamina Onlay Fusion.
Korean J Spine. 2008;5(4):251-257.
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Significance of Anterior Support in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: Single Stage Interbody Fusion with Transpedicular Screw Fixation Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation with Lamina Onlay Fusion.
Korean J Spine. 2008;5(4):251-257.
Close
OBJECTIVE
Surgical approaches to unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are variable and include anterior decompression with interbody fusion and fixation, anterolateral approach and posterior approach. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological results of single-stage interbody fusion with transpedicular screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation with lamina onlay fusion.
METHODS
Thirty-five patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were enrolled in the present study. The subject group was composed of 21 men and 14 women, with a mean age of 47.68+/-13.93 years(range, 19~76 years). Eighteen patients(Group I, anterior-posterior group) were treated with interbody fusion with transpedicular screw fixation with and 17 patients(Group II, posterior only group) were treated with pedicle screw fixation with onlay fusion. Both procedures were performed through single staged posterior approach. The neurological states, clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes were analyzed. Radiologic results were evaluated on the basis of kyphotic angle, percentage of anterior body compression and interbody height immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up examination.
RESULTS
Kyphotic angle, anterior body compression rate and interbody height were corrected in both groups. While the correction was maintained in the patients in group I, kyphosis and anterior body compression rate were aggravated in the patients in group II at follow-up. Both groups showed the same or improved modified Frankel grades and pain scores.
CONCLUSIONS
Group I showed better correction of kyphotic angle and percentage of anterior body compression than group II. Anterior column support plays an important role in maintaining the correction of kyphosis and this procedure can be effectively performed using single-stage unilateral posterior approach together with transpedicular screw fixation.
  • 3,337 View
  • 26 Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Benefits and Weaknesses of Interspinous Devices in Elderly Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparative Study of Interspinous U and Decompression Surgery Alone.
Korean J Spine. 2009;6(1):1-5.
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Benefits and Weaknesses of Interspinous Devices in Elderly Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparative Study of Interspinous U and Decompression Surgery Alone.
Korean J Spine. 2009;6(1):1-5.
Close
OBJECTIVE
Several types of interspinous process(ISP) devices have the common goal of limiting lumbar extension. In this study, we selected patients aged older than 60 years with lumbar spinal stenosis and assessed whether ISP devices are more beneficial in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis than simple decompression.
METHODS
Eighteen patients were treated with the Interspinous U device, and 17 patients were treated with decompre- ssion alone during the same period. Clinical results were assessed using the pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS) and activities of daily living(ADL). Radiologic results were assessed according to pre-and postoperative anterior disc height, posterior disc height, foraminal height, spondylolisthesis, segmental coronal angle and lordotic angle at the treated level.
RESULTS
The mean age of the patients in the interspinous device group was 66.9 years(range 60-78 years), and the mean age of the patients in the decompression group was 70.6 years(range 60-80 years). The mean pre- and postoperative VAS scores were 8.5 and 3.8, respectively, in interspinous devices group and 7.7 and 2.5 in the decompression group. Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in their VAS and ADL scores in comparison with their preoperative scores. Radiologically, there were no significant differences in anterior and posterior disc height or foraminal height in the interspinous devices group. Coronal and lordotic angles were reduced postoperatively in the device group but not in the decompression group. Listhesis at the treated level was significantly aggravated in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The ISP device was helpful in alleviating pain and improving ADL performance in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. It corrected segmental scoliosis and restricted extension. However Interspinous U may induce spondy- lolisthesis and do not prevent further displacement of preexisting spondylolisthesis. There should be careful selection to apply of this device in elderly patients.
  • 3,268 View
  • 27 Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Surgical Complications of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients.
Korean J Spine. 2010;7(3):167-172.
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Surgical Complications of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients.
Korean J Spine. 2010;7(3):167-172.
Close
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) in elderly patients.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of 210 patients who underwent TLIF & PSF was performed via the paraspinal transmuscular route from January 2004 to October 2007. Forty-one patients aged 65 years or more at the time of operation (Group 1) and 169 patients under the age of 65 years (Group 2) were involved in this study. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were investigated.
RESULTS
The series included 94 men and 116 women. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 70.9+/-5.4 years in Group 1 and 49.3+/-9.5 years in Group 2. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months, and the mean follow-up period was 40.7+/-11.5 months. In Group 1, intraoperative complication occurred in 3 patients (7.3%; dural tear), and postoperative complications were postoperative delirium(5 patients, 12.2%), acute myocardial infarction (2 patient, 4.9%), transient ischemic attack (2 patient, 4.9%), spondylodiscitis (3 patients, 7.3%), adjacent segment disease (7 patients, 17.1%) and pedicle screw loosening (4 patients, 9.8%). In Group 2, intraoperative complication occurred in 3 patients (1.8%; dural tear), and postoperative complications were postoperative delirium(3 patients, 1.8%), acute myocardial infarction (1 patient, 0.6%), transient ischemic attack (1 patient, 0.6%), spondylodiscitis (4 patients, 2.4%), adjacent segment disease (4 patients, 2.4%), pedicle screw fracture (5 patients, 3.0%) and pedicle screw loosening (2 patients, 1.2%). Among various complications, dural tear, postoperative delirium, spondylodiscitis, adjacent segment disease and pedicle screw loosening were statistically more frequent in the elderly patients.
CONCLUSION
As the TLIF and PSF procedures yielded a relatively high complication rate in elderly patients, delicate intraoperative and postoperative care is needed.
  • 4,533 View
  • 42 Download