Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

35
results for

"Adult spinal deformity"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Adult spinal deformity"

Original Articles

Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Sagittal Imbalance Deterioration After S2-Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity: What Role Does Dynamic Hip Joint Coverage Play?
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):427-443.   Published online April 30, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Sagittal Imbalance Deterioration After S2-Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity: What Role Does Dynamic Hip Joint Coverage Play?
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):427-443.   Published online April 30, 2026
Close
Objective
To determine the role of dynamic hip joint coverage in maintaining postoperative sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients following S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation.
Methods
A total of 224 ASD patients who underwent S2AI fixation were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on pre-to-post (from preoperative to postoperative) changes in femoral head coverage (ΔFHC): change group (group C) and noncoverage change group (group NC). Group C was further subdivided according to FHC recovery during follow-up into rebound (group C-R) and nonrebound (group C-NR) groups. Clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of hip and spinopelvic alignment were assessed preoperatively, at the initial postoperative standing, and at the 2-year follow-up.
Results
Compared to group C, patients in group NC demonstrated a higher incidence of sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications at 2-year follow-up, with a greater tendency for sagittal imbalance progression (p=0.013), a larger post-to-follow-up change in sagittal vertical axis (ΔSVA) (p=0.029), and a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (p=0.031). Although there was no significant difference in PJK incidence between group C-NR and group C-R (p=0.845), group C-NR showed a greater tendency for postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation (p=0.025), with a significantly larger ΔSVA during follow-up (p=0.002). The optimal cutoff values for predicting postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation were 3.5% for pre-to-post ΔFHC (area under the curve [AUC]=0.694) and 1.8% for post-to-follow-up ΔFHC (AUC=0.713).
Conclusion
Dynamic postoperative changes in hip joint coverage, characterized by the FHC, are associated with postoperative sagittal balance maintenance. Patients with limited pre-to-post and post-to-follow-up changes in the FHC demonstrate compromised hip joint compensatory capacity, thereby increasing the risk of postoperative sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications.
  • 285 View
  • 13 Download

Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Prioritized Correction at Osteotomy Site: A Novel Technique for Preventing Sagittal Translation During 3-Column Osteotomies in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):444-458.   Published online April 30, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Prioritized Correction at Osteotomy Site: A Novel Technique for Preventing Sagittal Translation During 3-Column Osteotomies in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):444-458.   Published online April 30, 2026
Close
Objective
To compare perioperative and complication outcomes, focusing on the prevention of sagittal translation (ST), between a novel “prioritized correction with multiple-rod construct” (PC-MRC) technique and traditional multiple-rod constructs (M-RC) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing 3-column osteotomies (3-COs).
Methods
In this retrospective study, 101 ASD patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after 3-COs were divided into 2 groups: PC-MRC (n=65) and M-RC (n=36). The PC-MRC technique involved initial osteotomy closure with short rods followed by global alignment correction with long rods. Radiographic and clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up.
Results
The PC-MRC group had significantly shorter operation time and lower estimated blood loss (p=0.045 and p=0.007, respectively). Major coronal and kyphotic deformity correction rates were similar between groups. No significant correction loss occurred at the final follow-up. Crucially, the incidence of ST was significantly lower in the PC-MRC group (1.5% vs. 25.0%, p<0.001). Correspondingly, the overall rate of neurological injury was lower in the PC-MRC group (7.7% vs. 22.2%, p=0.037).
Conclusion
The PC-MRC technique offers a versatile and rigid fixation for 3-COs in ASD patients, facilitating significant correction of global deformity. This straightforward technique effectively prevents massive blood loss and ST caused by 3-COs, while minimizing the risk of neurological complication.
  • 303 View
  • 11 Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparative Accuracy Assessment of Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthosis Fabrication: Conventional Contact Casting Versus Noncontact 3-Dimensional Digital Scanning
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):335-346.   Published online April 30, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparative Accuracy Assessment of Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthosis Fabrication: Conventional Contact Casting Versus Noncontact 3-Dimensional Digital Scanning
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):335-346.   Published online April 30, 2026
Close
Objective
Contact casting with plaster bandages is a standard technique for thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) fabrication. However, this hands-on process depends on the operator’s skill as well as requires a close physical contact, involving potential risks of coronavirus and influenza virus infection and the patient’s personal space violation. Recently, noncontact, highly accurate molding technology using 3-dimensional (3D) digital scanning has been developed. Although 3D scanning is widely applied for limb orthosis, its spinal application mainly focuses on pediatric scoliosis. Comparative studies across diverse body types remain limited. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the adaptability, accuracy, and fabrication time of TLSO produced using noncontact 3D digital scanning, comparing with conventional contact plaster-bandage casting.
Methods
TLSO was fabricated using both contact and noncontact techniques for mannequins with 4 different body types. High-precision scanner and computed tomography (CT) were used to assess the shape reproducibility by quantifying the gap area between the orthosis and mannequin. In addition, total fabrication time was compared between the 2 techniques.
Results
High-precision scanner identified that 3D scanning showed a higher shape reproducibility than conventional casting, particularly in curvilinear areas (all p<0.001). In CT measurement, 3D scanning demonstrated a smaller gap area in all the body types (all p<0.001). Fabrication time was also shorter during 3D scanning (54.9±0.9 minutes) than during conventional casting (100.0±5.5 minutes) (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Noncontact 3D digital scanning facilitates a rapid, accurate, and reproducible TLSO fabrication across diverse body types, providing a safer and more efficient alternative to conventional contact plaster-bandage casting.
  • 285 View
  • 15 Download

Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Establishing Optimal L1 Pelvic Angle Targets to Minimize Both Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Pelvic Nonresponse in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2025;22(4):987-997.   Published online December 31, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Establishing Optimal L1 Pelvic Angle Targets to Minimize Both Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Pelvic Nonresponse in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2025;22(4):987-997.   Published online December 31, 2025
Close
Objective
To determine the optimal targets of the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA) that minimize the risk of both proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and pelvic nonresponse (PNR) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients who underwent fusion surgery from the low thoracic spine (T9–12) to the pelvis and were followed up for 2 years. Risk factors for PJK and PNR were evaluated separately using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify L1PA cutoff values predictive of PJK and PNR across 3 pelvic incidence (PI) categories: <45°, 45°–60°, and ≥60°. L1PA thresholds were defined to delineate “ideal” alignment.
Results
Risk factor analyses revealed that low L1PA was an independent risk factor for PJK (odds ratio [OR], 0.927; p=0.019), while high PI–LL (OR, 1.101; p<0.001) and high L1PA (OR, 1.249; p<0.001) were significant risk factors for PNR. On ROC curve analyses, optimal L1PA ranges were 2.5°–4.5° for PI<45°, 8.7°–12.6° for PI 45°–60°, and 15.1°–17.3° for PI≥60°. Patients within these ideal L1PA ranges had significantly lower rates of both PJK and PNR compared to those exceeding ideal L1PA ranges.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that optimal correction based on these L1PA targets reduced the risk of both PJK and PNR. Therefore, these L1PA targets can serve as reliable alignment goals to optimize surgical outcomes in ASD surgery.
  • 1,339 View
  • 38 Download

Review Article

Meta-analysis

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Efficacy of Proximal Junctional Tethering in Spinal Fusion Surgery for Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure: A Meta-analysis
Neurospine. 2025;22(3):663-677.   Published online September 30, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Efficacy of Proximal Junctional Tethering in Spinal Fusion Surgery for Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure: A Meta-analysis
Neurospine. 2025;22(3):663-677.   Published online September 30, 2025
Close
Objective
Spinal fusion surgery is effective for treating various adult spinal deformities. However, spinal fusion surgery is associated with the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD; 5%–30%), particularly proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). Proximal junctional tethering (PJT) has become a popular technique owing to increasing evidence that it can decrease the rate of PJK or PJF.
Methods
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Twelve eligible studies were identified. These studies were predominantly retrospective in nature and compared the incidence of PJK or PJF in adults undergoing spinal fusion surgery with or without PJT. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. All outcomes were analyzed using R software (ver. 4.4.1).
Results
We included 8 retrospective cohort studies and 3 propensity-score-matched analyses; these studies comprised 1,424 patients. PJT was associated with a significant decrease in the odds of development of PJK (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.71) and PJF (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.69) compared with control. Subgroup analysis results revealed no significant difference in ASD rates between geographical locations, between tethering with and without crosslinks, and between specific tethering techniques.
Conclusion
PJT significantly reduces the odds of both PJK and PJF in adults undergoing spinal fusion surgery.
  • 4,538 View
  • 69 Download

Original Articles

Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1219-1229.   Published online December 31, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1219-1229.   Published online December 31, 2024
Close
Objective
We aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset neurological deficits (DONDs), DOND-related reoperation rates following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and efficacy of transverse process hooks (TPHs) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) compared to pedicle screws (PSs).
Methods
We included 90 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented fusion from the sacrum to the distal thoracic spine for ASD, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between 33 patients in the TPH group and 57 patients in the PS group, using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22), Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and various spinal sagittal parameters.
Results
While absent in the TPH group, myelopathy occurred in 15.8% of the PS group, wherein 15 patients underwent reoperation. The change in the proximal junctional angle, from the pre- to postoperative assessment, was lower in the TPH group than in the PS group (0.2 vs. 6.6, p=0.002). Postoperative facet degeneration in the PS group progressed more significantly than in the TPH group (0.5 vs. 0.1, p=0.002). Surgical outcomes were comparable for both groups, except for the back visual analogue scale (3.5 vs. 4.1, p=0.010) and SRS-22 domains, including pain and satisfaction (3.3 vs. 2.9, p=0.033; 3.7 vs. 3.3, p=0.041). No intergroup difference was observed in SF-36.
Conclusion
Using TPHs at the UIV level can prevent DOND, and thereby prevent postoperative myelopathy that necessitates reoperation; thus, TPHs is preferable over PSs in ASD surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Clinical and radiological outcomes of transverse process hooks versus pedicle screws at the upper instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing three-column osteotomy: A retrospective comparative study
    Mohsen Rostami, Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Navid Moghadam, Faramarz Roohollahi, Cesar Carballo Cuello, Jay Kumar, Mark Greenberg, Puya Alikhani
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2026; 261: 109263.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hook Fixation and Vertebroplasty for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Sung Tan Cho, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Sehan Park, Jin Hwan Kim, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Neurological Complications in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis
    Yam Wa Man, Jedidiah Yui Shing Lui, Chor Yin Lam, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang Cheung
    Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 243.     CrossRef
  • 3,706 View
  • 128 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Spinal Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1080-1090.   Published online December 31, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1080-1090.   Published online December 31, 2024
Close
Objective
To identify the risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite ideal sagittal correction according to age-adjusted alignment target.
Methods
The study included patients who underwent low thoracic to pelvic fusion for ASD and obtained ideal correction according to age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. PJF was defined either radiographically as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) of >28° plus a difference in PJA of >22° or clinically as revision surgery for proximal junctional complications. Clinical and radiographic variables were assessed to identify the risk factors for PJF.
Results
The final study cohort consisted of 196 patients, of whom 170 were women (86.7%), with an average age of 68.3 years. During mean follow-up duration of 45.9 months, PJF occurred in 43 patients (21.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.063; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001–1.129; p=0.046), large preoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.001–1.013; p=0.024), nonuse of a transverse process (TP) hook (OR, 5.556; 95% CI, 1.205–19.621; p=0.028), and high lumbar distribution index (LDI) (OR, 1.136; 95% CI, 1.109–1.164; p<0.001) were significant risk factors for PJF development.
Conclusion
A sizeable proportion of patients (21.9%) developed PJF despite achieving ideal sagittal correction. Using TP hooks with avoiding excessive LDI can be helpful to further mitigate the risk of PJF development in this patient group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Association between lumbar lordosis and proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdullah M. Alharran, AbdulMuhsen AlQallaf, Mohammad Mohammad, Mohammad Salem Alajmi, Mohammad Alkaak, Salem Y. Alenezi, Fahad Mohammad, Ahmad Al Ahmad, Nizar Algarni, Yousef Marwan
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Utility of Enabling Technologies in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Optimizing Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Execution to Maximize Patient Outcomes
    Nora C. Kim, Eli Johnson, Christopher DeWald, Nathan Lee, Timothy Y. Wang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(15): 5377.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative L1 Tilt as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Lower Thoracic Spine-to-Pelvis Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Minwook Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
    Spine.2025; 50(24): 1769.     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the December 2024 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1051.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors, Biomechanics, and Prevention Strategies for Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery – A Commentary on “Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignm
    Lee A. Tan
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1094.     CrossRef
  • New Insights Into Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery – A Commentary on “Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients
    Masayuki Miyagi, Gen Inoue, Masashi Takaso
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1091.     CrossRef
  • 6,727 View
  • 290 Download
  • 6 Crossref

Regular Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):856-864.   Published online September 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):856-864.   Published online September 30, 2024
Close
Objective
To identify risk factors and establish radiographic criteria for distal junctional failure (DJF) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), who underwent fusion surgery stopping at L5.
Methods
This retrospective study was undertaken from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients with ASD who underwent fusion surgery (≥5 levels) stopping at L5 were analyzed. DJF was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment pathology at the lumbosacral junction necessitating consideration for revision surgery. Demographic data and radiographic measurements were compared between the DJF and non-DJF groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the radiographic cutoff value for DJF.
Results
Among 76 patients, 16 (21.1%) experienced DJF. DJF was associated with older age, antidepressant/anxiolytic medication, longer level of fusions, and worse preoperative sagittal alignment. Antidepressant/anxiolytic medication (odds ratio, 5.60) and preoperative pelvic incidence (PI)–lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch>40° (odds ratio, 5.87) were independent risk factors for DJF. Without both factors, the incidence of DJF has been greatly reduced (9.1%). Two radiographic criteria were determined for DJF: last distal junctional angle (DJA)>-5° and Δ last DJA–post DJA>5°. When both criteria were met, the sensitivity and specificity of the DJF were 93.3% and 91.7%, respectively.
Conclusion
Use of antidepressant/anxiolytic medication and preoperative PI–LL mismatch >40° were independent risk factors for DJF. DJF could be diagnosed using postoperative changes in the DJA. If both criteria were met, DJF could be strongly suggested.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • L5 vs. pelvic fixation as the lowest instrumented vertebra in long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Faramarz Roohollahi, Natalie J. Bales, Anjali Pradhan, Sawyer Bauer, Katherine E. Baker, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Dana Saleh, Diego Soto Rubio, Patrick Kim, Waseem Aziz, Mark Greenberg, Mohsen Rostami, Puya Alikhani
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Innovative Technique of Revision Surgery for Distal Junctional Failure
    Masato Tanaka, Savvas Moschos, Chen B Jein, Aman Verma, Mohammed A Rezk Sharaf E H
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure in Adult Deformity Surgery Down to L5: Commentary on “Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria”
    Teppei Suzuki, Takashi Yurube
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 865.     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the September 2024 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 743.     CrossRef
  • 5,816 View
  • 126 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):721-731.   Published online June 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):721-731.   Published online June 30, 2024
Close
Objective
To determine the clinical impact of the baseline sagittal imbalance severity in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the pelvis, for ASD with a ≥ 2-year follow-up. Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the severity of the preoperative sagittal imbalance: mild, moderate, and severe. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were compared among the 3 groups.
Results
A total of 259 patients were finally included. There were 42, 62, and 155 patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The perioperative surgical burden was greatest in the severe group. Postoperatively, this group also showed the largest pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, suggesting a tendency towards undercorrection. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, or rod fractures among the groups. Visual analogue scale for back pain and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were similar across groups. However, severe group’s last follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly lower than those of the severe group.
Conclusion
Patients with severe sagittal imbalance were treated with more invasive surgical methods along with increased the perioperative surgical burden. All patients exhibited significant radiological and clinical improvements after surgery. However, regarding ODI, the severe group demonstrated slightly worse clinical outcomes than the other groups, probably due to relatively higher proportion of undercorrection. Therefore, more rigorous correction is necessary to achieve optimal sagittal alignment specifically in patients with severe baseline sagittal imbalance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Radiographic and clinical predictors of surgical outcomes following endoscopic decompression for radiculopathy in adult degenerative scoliosis: A multi-center retrospective study
    Mounica Paturu, Joshua Woo, Kosuke Saguira, David Huie, Christoph Hofstetter, Muhammad M. Abd-el-Barr
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105990.     CrossRef
  • Does Preoperative Spinal Alignment Influence Surgical Outcomes When Postoperative Alignment and Fixation Strategies Are Matched in ASD Correction?
    Donghua Huang, Zhan Wang, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Annika Bay, Robert N. Uzzo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Atahan Durbas, Andrea Pezzi, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Luis Felipe Colon, Kasra Araghi, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Sereen Halayqeh, Matthew E. Cunningh
    Spine.2026; 51(11): 761.     CrossRef
  • Balance or Strength? Reconsidering Muscle Metrics in Sagittal Malalignment in Adult Sagittal Deformity Patients
    Donghua Huang, Zhan Wang, Mihir Dekhne, Atahan Durbas, Tejas Subramanian, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Robert N. Uzzo, Luis Felipe Colón, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Han Jo Kim, Francis Lovecchio
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3293.     CrossRef
  • The predictive value of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score for mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Guilherme Santos Piedade, Carlos R. Goulart, Maria Fernanda Ricieri Ferraz Franco de Souza, Marcelo Ochoa Coelho de Souza Furlan, Philippe A. Mercier, Tobias A. Mattei
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100816.     CrossRef
  • 6,601 View
  • 111 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Assessing the Fractional Curve for Proper Management of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):458-473.   Published online June 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Assessing the Fractional Curve for Proper Management of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):458-473.   Published online June 30, 2024
Close
Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a coronal plane deformity often accompanied by sagittal plane malalignment. Surgical correction may involve the major and/or distally-located fractional curves (FCs). Correction of the FC has been increasingly recognized as key to ameliorating radicular pain localized to the FC levels. The present study aims to summarize the literature on the rationale for FC correction in ADS. Three databases were systematically reviewed to identify all primary studies reporting the rationale for correcting the FC in ADS. Articles were included if they were English full-text studies with primary data from ADS ( ≥ 18 years old) patients. Seventy-four articles were identified, of which 12 were included after full-text review. Findings suggest FC correction with long-segment fusion terminating at L5 increases the risk of distal junctional degeneration as compared to constructs instrumenting the sacrum. Additionally, circumferential fusion offers greater FC correction, lower reoperation risk, and shorter construct length. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques may offer effective radiographic correction and improve leg pain associated with foraminal stenosis on the FC concavity, though experiences are limited. Open surgery may be necessary to achieve adequate correction of severe, highly rigid deformities. Current data support major curve correction in ASD where the FC concavity and truncal shift are concordant, suggesting that the FC contributes to the patient’s overall deformity. Circumferential fusion and the use of kickstand rods can improve correction and enhance the stability and durability of long constructs. Last, MIS techniques show promise for milder deformities but require further investigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • The Impact of an Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Coronal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Aiyush Bansal, Takeshi Fujii, Rafael Garcia de Oliveira, Philip K. Louie, Venu M. Nemani, Jean-Christophe Leveque, Rajiv K. Sethi
    Operative Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Modified Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Planar Correction for Severe Adult Spinal Deformity: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes
    Truc Vu, Thai Hoang, Hanh Nguyen
    Orthopedic Research and Reviews.2026; Volume 18: 1.     CrossRef
  • How to view the effectiveness of spinal deformity surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis in octogenarian population? A comprehensive analysis and judgment
    Xiangyao Sun, Jiang Huang, Weiliang Wang, Limeng Gan, Li Cao, Yuqi Liu, Siyuan Sun, Juyong Wang, Shibao Lu
    Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Results of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis With Uniportal Endoscopic Decompression
    Liu Yu-Hsin, Chen Chia-Hsien
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(Suppl 2): S210.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of long-segment fixation versus short-segment fixation for treating adult degenerative scoliosis: A retrospective cohort study
    Zehua Jiang, Xuanhao Fu, Wenjun Du, Rusen Zhu
    Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 73: 101935.     CrossRef
  • 7,533 View
  • 201 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Transverse Process Hook Placement at the Proximal Thoracic Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):502-509.   Published online June 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Transverse Process Hook Placement at the Proximal Thoracic Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):502-509.   Published online June 30, 2024
Close
Objective
Few studies have reported radiographic and clinical outcomes of transverse process hook (TPH) placement at the proximal thoracic upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This study aims to investigate radiographic and clinical outcomes of TPH placement at the UIV for ASD surgery.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort of 56 patients with ASD (age, 59 ± 13 years; followup, 44 ± 19 months) from Johns Hopkins Hospital, who underwent long posterior spinal fusion to the proximal thoracic spine (T2–5). Visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item Short Form health survey scores, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) angle, PJK incidence, pattern of PJK, grades of TPH dislodgement, revision surgery, and factors associated with high-grade TPH dislodgement were analyzed.
Results
VAS for back pain and ODI values improved significantly from preoperatively to final follow-up. Mean change in PJK angle was 12° (range, 0.5°–43°). Twenty patients (36%) developed PJK, of whom 13 had compression fractures at 1 vertebra distal to the UIV (UIV–1). Final TPH position was stable in 42 patients (75%). In most patients (86%), TPH dislodgement did not progress after 6-month postoperative follow-up. Three patients (5.3%) underwent revision surgery to extend the fusion because of symptomatic PJK. Unstable TPH position was associated only with revision surgery and TK.
Conclusion
TPH placement at the proximal thoracic UIV for long fusion showed favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes in terms of the incidence of PJK and mean PJK angle at mean 44-month follow-up. TPHs placed in the proximal thoracic UIV were in stable position in 75% of patients. Compression fracture at UIV–1 was the most common pattern of PJK. PJK angle progression was greater in revision cases and in patients with greater preoperative thoracic kyphosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Clinical and radiological outcomes of transverse process hooks versus pedicle screws at the upper instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing three-column osteotomy: A retrospective comparative study
    Mohsen Rostami, Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Navid Moghadam, Faramarz Roohollahi, Cesar Carballo Cuello, Jay Kumar, Mark Greenberg, Puya Alikhani
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2026; 261: 109263.     CrossRef
  • Effects of paraspinal muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration on segmental kyphosis after conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in postmenopausal women
    Inwook Seo, Minjoon Cho, Taehoon Kang, Sungtaek Chung, Jae Hyup Lee
    European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,529 View
  • 101 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref

Review Article

Special Issue on AI & Robotics

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Spinal Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):20-29.   Published online February 1, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Spinal Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):20-29.   Published online February 1, 2024
Close
Spinal robotics have the potential to improve the consistency of outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The objective of this paper is to assess the accuracy of pedicle and S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws placed with robotic guidance in ASD patients. PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and an institutional library database were queried until May 2023. Articles were included if they described ASD correction via robotic guidance and pedicle and/or S2AI screw accuracy. Articles were excluded if they described pediatric/adolescent spinal deformity or included outcomes for both ASD and non-ASD patients without separating the data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Primary endpoints were pedicle screw accuracy based on the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale and self-reported accuracy percentages for S2AI screws. Data were extracted for patient demographics, operative details, and perioperative outcomes and assessed using descriptive statistics. Five studies comprising 138 patients were included (mean age 66.0 years; 85 females). A total of 1,508 screws were inserted using robotic assistance (51 S2AI screws). Two studies assessing pedicle screws reported clinically acceptable trajectory rates of 98.7% and 96.0%, respectively. Another study reported a pedicle screw accuracy rate of 95.5%. Three studies reported 100% accuracy across 51 total S2AI screws. Eight total complications and 4 reoperations were reported. Current evidence supports the application of robotics in ASD surgery as safe and effective for placement of both screw types. However, due to the paucity of data, a comprehensive assessment of its incremental benefit over other techniques cannot be made. Further work using expanded cohorts is merited.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • CT-Based Analysis of Rod Trace Length Changes During Posterior Spinal Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Takumi Takeuchi, Takafumi Iwasaki, Kaito Jinnai, Yosuke Kawano, Kazumasa Konishi, Masahito Takahashi, Hitoshi Kono, Naobumi Hosogane
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 778.     CrossRef
  • 2-staged robot-assisted vertebrectomy for metastatic lumbar spine lesion: a proof-of-concept case
    Antoine Keraudy, Pierre De Buck, Pierre Haettel, Boulos Ghannam, Richard Assaker, Henri-Arthur Leroy
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Circumferential Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review With Key Concepts and Technical Considerations
    Marcos Real, Logan H. Sigua, Matthew R. Allen, Nolan J. Brown, Timothy Y. Kim, Martin H. Pham
    World Neurosurgery.2026; 206: 124785.     CrossRef
  • Extended uses of robots in spine surgery beyond thoracolumbar pedicle screws: A narrative review
    Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Abhishek Soni, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Prabhu Krishnan
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Correction in a Surgical Specialty Hospital: Bringing Adult Spinal Deformity Care Closer to Home
    Roland Kent
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(8): 2913.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery: The Pearls and Pitfalls
    Nathan J. Lee, Joseph M. Lombardi, Sheeraz Qureshi, Ronald A. Lehman
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2025; 33(2): e81.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of Robotic Spine Surgery Technologies
    Martin H. Pham, Nolan J. Brown
    Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S75.     CrossRef
  • Spinal Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Key Concepts and Technical Considerations
    Kareem Khalifeh, Carson P. McCann, Nicholas S. Hernandez, Martin H. Pham
    Asian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025; 20(03): 448.     CrossRef
  • An update on improvement and innovation in the management of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity
    Thomas Pieters, Gabrielle Santangelo, Taylor Furst, Daniel M. Sciubba
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of severe neglected adult idiopathic scoliosis: A review article on challenges and contemporary treatment strategies
    Masashi Miyazaki, Tetsutaro Abe, Noriaki Sako, Nobuhiro Kaku
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 67: 103106.     CrossRef
  • Morbidity and Mortality of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using the Japanese Orthopedic Association National Registry/Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research Database (JOANR/JSSR-DB)
    Takumi Takeuchi, Hideyuki Arima, Tomoyuki Asada, Satoru Demura, Toru Doi, Akira Matsumura, Hiroki Oba, Ryo Sugawara, Satoshi Suzuki, Shinji Takahashi, Haruki Ueda, Yu Yamato, Kei Watanabe, Naobumi Hosogane
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2025; 9(4): 426.     CrossRef
  • MDWC-Net: a multi-scale dynamic-weighting context network for precise spinal X-ray segmentation
    Zhongzheng Gu, Xuan Wang, Baojun Chen
    Frontiers in Physiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Applications and Future Directions of Technologies Used in Adult Deformity Surgery for Personalized Alignment: A Narrative Review
    Janet Hsu, Taikhoom M. Dahodwala, Noel O. Akioyamen, Evan Mostafa, Rami Z. AbuQubo, Xiuyi Alexander Yang, Priya K. Singh, Daniel C. Berman, Rafael De la Garza Ramos, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jonathan D. Krystal, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2025; 15(10): 480.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assistance in revision thoracolumbar fusion surgeries – Prospective study of 64 patients
    Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Abhishek Soni, Akhil Xavier Joseph, R Dinesh Iyer
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 71: 103247.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical optimization of pedicle screw trajectories in osteoporotic lumbar fusion: finite element analysis and validation of robotic-assisted implementation
    Cheng Zhong, Zhe Han
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Robotics Planning Facilitates Complex Construct Design in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery—A Preliminary Experience
    Martin H. Pham, Nicholas S. Hernandez, Lauren E. Stone
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(7): 1829.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei Cui, Xinglin Liu, Zhiheng Zhao, Zihe Feng, Xianglong Meng
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Importance of Planning Ahead: A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Novel Trans-Facet Corridor for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Segmentation Technology
    Troy Q. Tabarestani, Peter N. Drossopoulos, Chuan-Ching Huang, Alyssa M. Bartlett, Mounica R. Paturu, Christopher I. Shaffrey, John H. Chi, Wilson Z. Ray, C. Rory Goodwin, Timothy J. Amrhein, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 188: e247.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion”
    Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 440.     CrossRef
  • Does Robotic Spine Surgery Add Value to Surgical Practice over Navigation-Based Systems? A Study on Operating Room Efficiency
    Pirateb Paramasivam Meenakshi Sundaram, Daniel Yang Yao Peh, Jane Wenjin Poh, Guna Pratheep Kalanchiam, Wayne Ming Quan Yap, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh
    Medicina.2024; 60(12): 2112.     CrossRef
  • 8,507 View
  • 146 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1272-1280.   Published online December 31, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1272-1280.   Published online December 31, 2023
Close
Objective
Although adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to restore and maintain alignment, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) may occur. While existing scoring systems predict PJK, they predominantly offer a generalized 3-tier risk classification, limiting their utility for nuanced treatment decisions. This study seeks to establish a personalized risk calculator for PJK, aiming to enhance treatment planning precision.
Methods
Patient data for ASD were sourced from the Korean spinal deformity database. PJK was defined a proximal junctional angle (PJA) of ≥ 20° at the final follow-up, or an increase in PJA of ≥ 10° compared to the preoperative values. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent variables. Subsequently, 5 machine learning models were created to predict individualized PJK risk post-ASD surgery. The most efficacious model was deployed as an online and interactive calculator.
Results
From a pool of 201 patients, 49 (24.4%) exhibited PJK during the follow-up period. Through multivariable analysis, postoperative PJA, body mass index, and deformity type emerged as independent predictors for PJK. When testing machine learning models using study results and previously reported variables as hyperparameters, the random forest model exhibited the highest accuracy, reaching 83%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.76. This model has been launched as a freely accessible tool at: (https://snuspine.shinyapps.io/PJKafterASD/).
Conclusion
An online calculator, founded on the random forest model, has been developed to gauge the risk of PJK following ASD surgery. This may be a useful clinical tool for surgeons, allowing them to better predict PJK probabilities and refine subsequent therapeutic strategies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • THE INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SPINAL CARE ASSESSMENT AND SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW
    Anıl Murat Öztürk, Cemre Aydın, Onur Süer, Erhan Sesli, Ömer Akçalı, Emin Alıcı
    Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery.2026; 37(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Explainable Machine Learning Approach to Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: Machine Learning Outperforms Logistic Regression
    Bashar Zaidat, Mark Kurapatti, Jonathan S. Gal, Samuel K. Cho, Jun S. Kim
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(4): 1992.     CrossRef
  • Machine-learning models for the prediction of ideal surgical outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity
    Dongfan Wang, Qijun Wang, Peng Cui, Shuaikang Wang, Di Han, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2025; 107-B(3): 337.     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review
    Liangyu Shi, Hongfei Wang, Graham Ka-Hon Shea
    JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review
    Paolo Brigato, Gianluca Vadalà, Sergio De Salvatore, Leonardo Oggiano, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Pier Francesco Costici, Vincenzo Denaro
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104273.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery
    Cheng Zhang, Shanshan Liu, Jialin Shi, Xingyu Zhou, Peter Passias, Nanfang Xu, Weishi Li
    Spine Research.2025; 1(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Novel risk factors and personalized risk calculator for predicting proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery
    Qijun Wang, Zheng Wang, Dongfan Wang, Xuan Zhao, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2025; 107-B(8): 829.     CrossRef
  • Implications of artificial intelligence
    Michael W. Fields, Nathan J. Lee, Ronald A. Lehman
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2024; 36(3): 101122.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning applications in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a narrative review
    Nader Toossi, Ozhan Jerry
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2024; 4(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of postoperative mechanical complications in ASD patients based on total sequence and proportional score of spinal sagittal plane
    Wenbin Jiang, Huagang Shi, Tao Gu, Zonglin Cai, Qinglong Li
    SLAS Technology.2024; 29(6): 100222.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Step Towards True “Precision” Medicine?: Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity
    Lara M. Höbner, Alexandra Grob, Victor E. Staartjes
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1284.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning”
    In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the December 2023 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1093.     CrossRef
  • 5,383 View
  • 196 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref

Review Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):876-889.   Published online September 30, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):876-889.   Published online September 30, 2023
Close
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients’ quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF’s pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Relative influence of paraspinal muscularity and underlying bone quality on proximal junctional kyphosis and failure mode in patients undergoing thoracolumbar instrumented fusion
    Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Michael L. Martini, Andrew J. Grossbach, Gabriella L. Paganucci, Ahmad N. Nassr, Brett A. Freedman, Arjun Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2026; 261: 109286.     CrossRef
  • Differential Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Between T8-T10 and T11-L1 Upper Instrumented Vertebrae in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
    Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neurologic deficits due to proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: how often do they happen and do they improve?
    Hani Chanbour, Alan R. Tang, Harsh Jain, Alexander T. Lyons, Soren Jonzzon, Iyan Younus, Steven G. Roth, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between lumbar lordosis and proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdullah M. Alharran, AbdulMuhsen AlQallaf, Mohammad Mohammad, Mohammad Salem Alajmi, Mohammad Alkaak, Salem Y. Alenezi, Fahad Mohammad, Ahmad Al Ahmad, Nizar Algarni, Yousef Marwan
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hook Fixation and Vertebroplasty for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Sung Tan Cho, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Sehan Park, Jin Hwan Kim, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proximal junctional kyphosis above long spinal fusions
    Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero
    Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.2025; 111(1): 104065.     CrossRef
  • Sex-Specific Influence of Preoperative Musculoskeletal Characteristics on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Seungjun Ryu, Danbi Park, Ji Yeon Baek, Chongman Kim, Hong Kyung Shin, Sun Woo Jang, Jeoung Hee Kim, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123435.     CrossRef
  • The Paraspinal Sarcopenia at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Is a Predictor of Discoligamentous but Not Bony Proximal Junctional Kyphosis
    Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Maria Astudillo Potes, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A. Freedman, Arjun S. Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1207.     CrossRef
  • Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure
    Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, Jensen Smith, Nicole McGrath, Leah Y. Carreon
    Spine.2025; 50(5): 304.     CrossRef
  • The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional failure after limited lumbar fusion for adult spinal deformity
    Hiroshi Moridaira, Satoshi Inami, Masahiko Takahata, Daisaku Takeuchi, Haruki Ueda, Takuya Iimura, Tomoya Kanto, Satoshi Takada, Kazuo Doi, Hiroshi Taneichi
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review
    Paolo Brigato, Gianluca Vadalà, Sergio De Salvatore, Leonardo Oggiano, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Pier Francesco Costici, Vincenzo Denaro
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104273.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review of risk factors and prevention strategies: how to minimize mechanical complications in corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Jin-Sung Park, Hyun-Jun Kim, Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(3): 463.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis and MRI-based pedicle bone quality scores in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Junhu Li, Qiujiang Li, Linnan Wang, Zhipeng Deng, Shuxin Zheng, Lei Wang, Yueming Song
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early catastrophic proximal junctional fracture after spinal instrumentation in geriatric patients
    Celal Özbek Çakır, Murat Baloglu
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(3): 586.     CrossRef
  • Radiologische Diagnostik bei Wirbelsäulentraumata in besonderen Konstellationen
    Umut Yilmaz, Malvina Garner
    Die Radiologie.2025; 65(11): 815.     CrossRef
  • Mitigating Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure: The Role of Tethering in a Multifactorial Problem – A Commentary on “Efficacy of Proximal Junctional Tethering in Spinal Fusion Surgery for Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctiona
    Niall Buckley, Ashel C. Dsouza, Lee A. Tan
    Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 678.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density: Correlating MRI Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality, CT Hounsfield Units, and DEXA T-Scores
    Rose Fluss, Riana Lo Bu, Alireza Karandish, Sertac Kirnaz, Rafael De la Garza Ramos, Saikiran G. Murthy, Reza Yassari, Yaroslav Gelfand
    Medical Sciences.2025; 13(4): 304.     CrossRef
  • Predicting proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning models based on spinal alignment parameters
    Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Features of approximation of finite-element models of transpedicular spinal fixation and their computational efficiency
    Aleksey E. Shulga, Mikhail S. Korolev, Sergey P. Ivzhenko, Daniil M. Puchinyan, Vladimir S. Tolkachev, Stanislav D. Shuvalov
    Journal of Volgograd State Medical University.2025; 22(4): 107.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Surgical Strategies for Preventing Proximal Junctional Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques in Adult Spinal Deformity
    HyungSub Jin, Kyung-Soo Suk, Byung Ho Lee, Si Young Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Sub-Ri Park, Namhoo Kim, Jae Won Shin, Ji-Won Kwon
    Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 1012.     CrossRef
  • Instrumentation Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients
    David P. Falk, Ravi Agrawal, Bijan Dehghani, Rohit Bhan, Sachin Gupta, Munish C. Gupta
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4326.     CrossRef
  • Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient
    Umesh S. Metkar, W. Jacob Lavelle, Kylan Larsen, Ram Haddas, William F. Lavelle
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100531.     CrossRef
  • Cyphose jonctionnelle proximale au-dessus des fusions rachidiennes étendues
    Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero
    Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique.2024; 110(6): 761.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing preoperative bone health assessment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective correlation analysis of intraoperative pedicle screw insertion torque and imaging modalities in Japan
    Keishi Maruo, Fumihiro Arizumi, Tomoyuki Kusukawa, Masakazu Toi, Masaru Hatano, Tetsuto Yamaura, Kazuya Kishima, Toshiya Tachibana
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(4): 532.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Degeneration and Failure Modes
    Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Mitchell J. Campbell, Mladen Djurasovic, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, R. Kirk Owens, Kathryn J. McCarthy, Leah Y. Carreon
    Spine.2024; 49(21): 1465.     CrossRef
  • Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits
    Sun-Joon Yoo, Hyun-Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Jeong-Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong-Kyu Chin, Keun-Su Kim, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Kyung-Hyun Kim
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1219.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors, Biomechanics, and Prevention Strategies for Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery – A Commentary on “Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignm
    Lee A. Tan
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1094.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion
    Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1080.     CrossRef
  • 12,411 View
  • 579 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):863-875.   Published online September 30, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):863-875.   Published online September 30, 2023
Close
Proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) is a common imaging finding after long-level fusion, and proximal junctional failure (PJF) is an aggravated form of the progressive disease spectrum of PJK. This includes vertebral fracture of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, instability between UIV and UIV+1, neurological deterioration requiring surgery. Many studies have reported on PJK and PJF after long segment instrumentation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). In particular, for spine deformity surgeons, risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF are very important to minimize reoperation. Therefore, this review aims to help reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF by updating the latest contents of PJK and PJF by 2023, focusing on the risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF. We conducted a search on multiple database for articles published until February 2023 using the search keywords “proximal junctional kyphosis,” “proximal junctional failure,” “proximal junctional disease,” and “adult spinal deformity.” Finally, 103 papers were included in this study. Numerous factors have been suggested as potential risks for the development of PJK and PJF, including a high body mass index, inadequate postoperative sagittal balance and overcorrection, advanced age, pelvic instrumentation, and osteoporosis. Recently, with the increasing elderly population, sarcopenia has been emphasized. The quality and quantity of muscle in the surgical site have been suggested as new risk factor. Therefore, spine surgeon should understand the pathophysiology of PJK and PJF, as well as individual risk factors, in order to develop appropriate prevention strategies for each patient.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Identifying Distinct Risk Factors for Early-Onset and Late-Onset PJK in ASD: A Comparative Analysis Across Non-PJK, Early-Onset PJK, and Late-Onset PJK Groups
    Donghua Huang, Han Jo Kim, Zhan Wang, Mihir Dekhne, Robert Uzzo, Atahan Durbas, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Tejas Subramanian, Andrea Pezzi, Luis Felipe Colon, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Francis Lovecchio
    Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 382.     CrossRef
  • Lumbar Lateral Dislocation Fracture With Progressive Worsening of Trunk Tilt in Pisa Syndrome Associated With Parkinson′s Disease
    Kazuki Fujimoto, Narumi Maki, Daisuke Hashiba, Toshifumi Maeyama, Haruki Ito, Ryosuke Nakagawa, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa, Hajime Arai, Seiji Ohtori, Shashank Kaushik
    Case Reports in Orthopedics.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of adult spinal deformity surgery in octogenarians - How old is too old? 
    So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Naohiro Kawamura, Yusuke Sato, Yuki Onishi, Yuta Nakayama, Hideki Nakamoto, Kosei Nagata, Hiroyuki Nakarai, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(2): 388.     CrossRef
  • Key Considerations for the Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Literature Review
    Zikrina A. Lanodiyu, Yudha M. Sakti, Ahmad J. Rahyussalim, Keiji Nagata
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2026; 10(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Neurologic deficits due to proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: how often do they happen and do they improve?
    Hani Chanbour, Alan R. Tang, Harsh Jain, Alexander T. Lyons, Soren Jonzzon, Iyan Younus, Steven G. Roth, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between lumbar lordosis and proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdullah M. Alharran, AbdulMuhsen AlQallaf, Mohammad Mohammad, Mohammad Salem Alajmi, Mohammad Alkaak, Salem Y. Alenezi, Fahad Mohammad, Ahmad Al Ahmad, Nizar Algarni, Yousef Marwan
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correction of proximal junctional failure using transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion: a technical note
    Bryan Ladd, Kristen Jones, David Polly
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distinct Mechanisms of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Their Clinical Implications
    Hani Chanbour, Harsh Jain, Advith Sarikonda, Omar Zakieh, Ambika Paulson, Walter Navid, Iyan Younus, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Spine.2026; 51(9): 622.     CrossRef
  • Vertebral pelvic angles accurately predict risk of proximal junctional kyphosis following long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity
    Michael W. Fields, Justin K. Scheer, Matthew Weintraub, Juan Baltazar, Fthimnir Hassan, Omar Taha, Anastasia M. Ferraro, Erik Lewerenz, Matthew J. Cooney, Joseph M. Lombardi, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Lawrence G. Lenke, Ronald A. Lehman
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical planning for spinal deformity correction: the contribution of patient-specific rods
    Solène Prost, Corentin Petitpas, Stephane Fuentes, Sebastien Pesenti, Benjamin Blondel
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure risk around the thoracolumbar junction: Impact of anterior malalignment, pelvic retroversion, and upper instrumented level selection
    Mauricio Hansen, Lluis Vila, Aleksander Leszczynski, Carlos Aleman, Frank Meyer, Caroline Deck, Sleiman Haddad, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Ferran Pellisé, Anika Pupak, Ibrahim Obeid, Louis Boissière, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstück, Markus Loibl, Javier Pizones
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106082.     CrossRef
  • Extension of Fusion to the Cervical Spine Versus Upper Thoracic Spine for the Management of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis of Thoracolumbar Fusion
    Ahmed Sulieman, Maxwell Sahhar, Yesha H. Parekh, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Breton G. Line, Christopher P. Ames, Shay Bess, Thomas J. Buell, Robert K. Eastlack, Jeffrey L. Gum, Munish C. Gupta, Richard A. Hostin, Han Jo Kim, Darryl Lau, Gregory M. Mu
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(4): 160.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hook Fixation and Vertebroplasty for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Sung Tan Cho, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Sehan Park, Jin Hwan Kim, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of predictors for proximal junctional kyphosis and failure following all-posterior surgery for adolescent-onset kyphotic deformities
    Salih Kaya, Sinan Yılar
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Preoperative Spinal Alignment Influence Surgical Outcomes When Postoperative Alignment and Fixation Strategies Are Matched in ASD Correction?
    Donghua Huang, Zhan Wang, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Annika Bay, Robert N. Uzzo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Atahan Durbas, Andrea Pezzi, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Luis Felipe Colon, Kasra Araghi, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Sereen Halayqeh, Matthew E. Cunningh
    Spine.2026; 51(11): 761.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Prediction of Unplanned Reoperation Postspinal Surgery Within 30 Days
    Hai-yang Qiu, Chang-bo Lu, Da-ming Liu, Wei-chen Dong, Chao Han, Jiao-jiao Dai, Zi-xiang Wu, Wei Lei, Yang Zhang
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 193: 647.     CrossRef
  • Sex-Specific Influence of Preoperative Musculoskeletal Characteristics on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Seungjun Ryu, Danbi Park, Ji Yeon Baek, Chongman Kim, Hong Kyung Shin, Sun Woo Jang, Jeoung Hee Kim, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123435.     CrossRef
  • Proximal junctional kyphosis above long spinal fusions
    Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero
    Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.2025; 111(1): 104065.     CrossRef
  • Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure
    Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, Jensen Smith, Nicole McGrath, Leah Y. Carreon
    Spine.2025; 50(5): 304.     CrossRef
  • Response to SPINE Letter-to-the-Editor Re: Enhancing the Clinical Applicability of the Novel Classification System for Proximal Junctional Degeneration
    Riza Mert Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Mitchell J. Campbell, Mladen Djurasovic, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, R. Kirk Owens, Kathryn J. McCarthy, Leah Y. Carreon
    Spine.2025; 50(5): E102.     CrossRef
  • The Paraspinal Sarcopenia at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Is a Predictor of Discoligamentous but Not Bony Proximal Junctional Kyphosis
    Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Maria Astudillo Potes, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A. Freedman, Arjun S. Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1207.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment
    Mohammad Daher, Marven Aoun, Ethan J. Cottrill, Zhi Wang, Richard K. Hurley, William F. Lavelle, Peter G. Passias, Bassel G. Diebo, Alan H. Daniels, Amer Sebaaly
    Spine.2025; 50(6): 412.     CrossRef
  • A Commentary on “Impact of Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on Surgical Outcomes and Radiographical Sagittal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Multicenter Study”
    Yutaro Kanda
    Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Antiosteoporosis medication in patients with posterior spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    HyungSub Jin, HyungJu Jin, Kyung-Soo Suk, Byung Ho Lee, Si Young Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Sub-Ri Park, Namhoo Kim, Jae Won Shin, Ji-Won Kwon
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(9): 1877.     CrossRef
  • Adolescent scoliosis in autism spectrum disorder: is it idiopathic or syndromic??
    Ravi Rajendra, Matthew B. Bratton, Claudia Leonardi, R. Carter Clement
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review of risk factors and prevention strategies: how to minimize mechanical complications in corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Jin-Sung Park, Hyun-Jun Kim, Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(3): 463.     CrossRef
  • Management of Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Best practices and controversies
    Nuri Demirci, Mohamed A. Zaazoue, Munish C. Gupta
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 69: 103158.     CrossRef
  • Utility of Enabling Technologies in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Optimizing Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Execution to Maximize Patient Outcomes
    Nora C. Kim, Eli Johnson, Christopher DeWald, Nathan Lee, Timothy Y. Wang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(15): 5377.     CrossRef
  • Effect of pelvic compensation capacity on proximal junctional kyphosis: a stratified analysis of pelvic tilt in adult spinal deformity surgery
    Yanjie Xu, Changsheng Fan, Dongyue Li, Yong Qiu, Zhen Liu, Zezhang Zhu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can proximal junctional failure be predicted after adult spinal deformity surgery by experienced deformity surgeons based on patient, surgical and radiographic parameters?
    Marc Khalifé, Ayman Mohamed, David Ben-Israel, Joshua T. Bunch, Alan H. Daniels, Bassel G. Diebo, Robert Eastlack, Richard G. Fessler, Munish C. Gupta, Kojo Hamilton, Richard Hostin, Han Jo Kim, Eric O. Klineberg, Lawrence G. Lenke, Jeffrey Mullin, Pravee
    European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing the Risk of Junctional Complications Following Undercorrection of Sagittal Vertebral Axis in Degenerative Scoliosis
    Johan Lee, Edward S. Harake, Rushikesh S. Joshi, Katherine G. Holste, Momodou Bah, Michael J. Albdewi, Mark M. Zaki, Michael B. Cloney, Noojan J. Kazemi, Osama N. Kashlan, Yamaan S. Saadeh
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 204: 124558.     CrossRef
  • The influence of frailty on outcomes of adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Farhang Rashidi, Yatin Srinivash Ramesh Babu, Pouria Delbari, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Diego T. Soto Rubio, Muhammad H. Durrani, Fayyadh Yusuf, César Carballo Cuello, Hoon Choi, Daniel H. Kim, Alexander Yu, Puya Alikhani
    Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder: Brain Areas Involved, Neurobiological Mechanisms, Diagnoses and Therapies
    Jacopo Lamanna, Jacopo Meldolesi
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(4): 2423.     CrossRef
  • Re-Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of Semi-Rigid Fixation Using a Nitinol Spring Rod in Lumbar Surgery: A Retrospective Study on an Effective Alternative for Reducing Adjacent Segment Disease
    Hyun-Jun Jang, Bong-Ju Moon, Dong-Kyu Chin
    Applied Sciences.2024; 14(11): 4574.     CrossRef
  • Cyphose jonctionnelle proximale au-dessus des fusions rachidiennes étendues
    Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero
    Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique.2024; 110(6): 761.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Degeneration and Failure Modes
    Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Mitchell J. Campbell, Mladen Djurasovic, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, R. Kirk Owens, Kathryn J. McCarthy, Leah Y. Carreon
    Spine.2024; 49(21): 1465.     CrossRef
  • Frail patients require instrumentation of a more proximal vertebra for a successful outcome after surgery for adult spine deformity
    Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Pawel P. Jankowski, Ankita Das, Renaud Lafage, Justin S. Smith, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Virginie Lafage, Peter G. Passias
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2024; 106-B(11): 1342.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine
    Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Renaud Lafage, Peter Tretiakov, Justin S. Smith, Breton G. Line, Bassel G. Diebo, Alan H. Daniels, Jeffrey L. Gum, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis, David Kojo Hamilton, Thomas Buell, Alex Soroceanu, Justin Scheer, Robert K. Eastlack,
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(24): 7722.     CrossRef
  • Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits
    Sun-Joon Yoo, Hyun-Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Jeong-Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong-Kyu Chin, Keun-Su Kim, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Kyung-Hyun Kim
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1219.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion
    Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1080.     CrossRef
  • 14,160 View
  • 372 Download
  • 37 Web of Science
  • 40 Crossref