Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

19
results for

"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion"

Original Articles

Cervical Spine

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Radiographic Characteristics of Caudal Segment in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Bony Buttress Formation
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1241-1250.   Published online December 31, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Radiographic Characteristics of Caudal Segment in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Bony Buttress Formation
Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1241-1250.   Published online December 31, 2024
Close
Objective
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with anterior plating is a commonly performed procedure for cervical disc diseases. While the clinical outcomes of most reported multilevel ACDF cases are excellent, symptomatic pseudarthrosis remains a challenge, often requiring revision surgeries. This study aims to present the radiological characteristics of multilevel ACDF constructs, which can be considered during intraoperative management to prevent pseudarthrosis.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent multilevel (3 or 4 levels) ACDF with anterior plating between June 2010 and August 2022. Patients were regularly followed at 4 months, 12 months, and then annually postoperation. Fusion rates and characteristic radiological patterns, such as the formation of bony buttresses underneath the anterior plate, were graded and evaluated.
Results
A total of 163 patients were included in the study. Overall fusion rates were 26.38%, 64.34%, and 81.58% at 4-month, 1-year, and the final follow-up, respectively. Nonunions at 4-month follow-up with tightly engaged anterior plate with bony buttress formation were more likely to fuse in the later period (Buttress grade 0 vs. 1; p=0.01, odds ratio [OR], 5.70, Buttress grade 1 vs. >2; p<0.01, OR, 12.00).
Conclusion
This study emphasizes the significance of pseudarthrosis following multilevel ACDF. Pseudarthrosis predominantly occurs in the caudal-most segment of the construct, particularly when it terminates at C7. Constructs that are not tightly engaged and lack bony buttress formation in the caudal part of multilevel ACDF are more likely to develop pseudarthrosis.
  • 4,960 View
  • 93 Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):1047-1060.   Published online September 30, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Neurospine. 2023;20(3):1047-1060.   Published online September 30, 2023
Close
Objective
Cervical myelopathy (CM) describes the compressive cervical spinal cord state, often accompanied by serious clinical condition, by herniated disc or hypertrophied spurs or ligament. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been frequently employed as conventional surgical solution for this CM despite its inherent biomechanical handicap. Alternatively, an artificial disc replacement (ADR) preserves cervical motion while still decompressing the spinal canal and neural foramen. This analysis elaborated to clarify the potential benefits of ADR application to CM over ACDF from the conglomerated results of the past references.
Methods
A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane review, and KMbase databases from the studies published until March 2023. Six studies (3 randomized controlled study [RCTs] and 3 non-RCTs) were included in a qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model to obtain effect size and its statistical significance. Quality assessment and evidence level were established in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology.
Results
Among 6 studies, 2 studies showed that ADR group achieved significantly better clinical improvement than the ACDF group, while the rest 4 studies revealed no significant difference. A meta-analysis showed better clinical outcomes with or without statistical significance. The level of evidence was low because of inconsistency and imprecision.
Conclusion
ADR was superior or at least, not inferior to ACDF in terms of functional recovery. However, its application to the CM patients is merely empowered with weak strength due to low level of evidence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • ACDF and cervical disc replacement for single-level cervical spine degenerative disease: a frailty driven propensity score-matched comparative analysis
    Nithin Gupta, Omar Sbaih, William DiCiurcio III, Mark Miller, Ruchir Nanavati, Hunter Smith, Blake Delgadillo, Matthew Meade, Aman Singh, Rohin Singh, Christian Bowers
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Two-Level ACDF in Treating Consecutive Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yihan Yang, Weishi Liang, Duan Sun, Bo Han, Zhangfu Li, Yeqiu Xu, Peng Yin, Xianjun Qu, Yong Hai
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(8): 3953.     CrossRef
  • Recent progress in surgical treatment of cervical spine myelopathy – A narrative review
    Jun Ouchida, Hiroaki Nakashima, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Ippei Yamauchi, Shiro Imagama
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 68: 103074.     CrossRef
  • Cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Yu Zhang, Jidong Ju, Jinchun Wu
    Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does the novel artificial cervical joint complex resolve the conflict between stability and mobility after anterior cervical surgery? a finite element study
    Bing Meng, Xiong Zhao, Xin-Li Wang, Jian Wang, Chao Xu, Wei Lei
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Practical Answers to Frequently Asked Questions in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions
    Tejas Subramanian, Austin Kaidi, Pratyush Shahi, Tomoyuki Asada, Takashi Hirase, Avani Vaishnav, Omri Maayan, Troy B. Amen, Kasra Araghi, Chad Z. Simon, Eric Mai, Olivia C. Tuma, Ashley Yeo Eun Kim, Nishtha Singh, Maximillian K. Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Myle
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2024; 32(18): e919.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic Characteristics of Caudal Segment in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Bony Buttress Formation
    Chang Hwa Ham, Joo Han Kim, Youn-Kwan Park, Woo-Keun Kwon, Hong Joo Moon
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1241.     CrossRef
  • 13,740 View
  • 239 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management of Postoperative Hematoma Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Diseases
Neurospine. 2023;20(2):525-535.   Published online June 30, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management of Postoperative Hematoma Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Diseases
Neurospine. 2023;20(2):525-535.   Published online June 30, 2023
Close
Objective
Studies discussed few risk factors for specific patients, such as duration of disease; or surgical factors, such as duration and time of surgery; or C3 or C7 involvement, which could have led to the formation of hematomas (HTs). To investigate the incidence, risk factors especially the factors mentioned above, and management of postoperative HTs following anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACF) for degenerative cervical diseases.
Methods
Medical records of 1,150 patients who underwent ACF for degenerative cervical diseases at our hospital between 2013 and 2019 were identified and reviewed. Patients were categorized into the HT group (HT group) or normal group (no-HT group). Demographic, surgical and radiographic data were recorded prospectively to identify risk factors for HT.
Results
Postoperative HT was identified in 11 patients, with an incidence rate of 1.0% (11 of 1,150). HT occurred within 24 hours postoperatively in 5 patients (45.5%), while it occurred at an average of 4 days postoperatively in 6 patients (54.5%). Eight patients (72.7%) underwent HT evacuation; all patients were successfully treated and discharged. Smoking history (odds ratio [OR], 5.193; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.058–25.493; p = 0.042), preoperative thrombin time (TT) value (OR, 1.643; 95% CI, 1.104–2.446; p = 0.014) and antiplatelet therapy (OR, 15.070; 95% CI, 2.663–85.274; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for HT. Patients with postoperative HT had longer days of first-degree/intensive nursing (p < 0.001) and greater hospitalization costs (p = 0.038).
Conclusion
Smoking history, preoperative TT value and antiplatelet therapy were independent risk factors for postoperative HT following ACF. High-risk patients should be closely monitored through the perioperative period. Postoperative HT in ACF was associated with longer days of first-degree/intensive nursing and more hospitalization costs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Risk factors for symptomatic hematoma following cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    ChenGuang Wang, ChengHan Xu, YinGang Zhang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics of cervical myelopathy and factors associated with severe disease among patients with cervical disc herniation in a tertiary center in Palestine
    Ahmed Daqour, Heyam Shakarneh, Tala Sharaqa, Ghaya Belih, Batoul Feeno, Iba Hmouz, Shahed Nasser, Abdulsalam Alkaiyat, Ahmad Rjoub, Mohammad Abuawad
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel Risk Factors for Postoperative Hematoma Requiring Reoperation Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Dana G. Rowe, Seeley Yoo, Connor Barrett, Emily Luo, Alissa Arango, Matthew Morris, Kerri-Anne Crowell, Russel R. Kahmke, C. Rory Goodwin, Melissa M. Erickson
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(5): E234.     CrossRef
  • Incidence, risk factors and airway management of postoperative haematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective nested case-control study
    Yang Tian, Jiao Li, Guangjin Zhou, Mingya Wang, Yinyin Qu, Min Li, Jun Wang, Mao Xu, Shenglin Wang, Xiangyang Guo, Yongzheng Han
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(4): e090547.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Inclinatory Foraminotomy : A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Kwan-Su Song, Pius Kim
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2025; 68(4): 446.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Spinal Epidural Hematoma After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Case Report
    Jerzy Gregorczyk, Negin Fani, Mikołaj Biegański, Jakub Mocarski, Pawel Kowalczyk, Piotr Dąbrowski, Rafał Górski, Mateusz Bielecki
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 203: 124442.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of thyroid surgery by applying a haemostatic agent with and without a drain
    S. M. Asikur Rahat, M. Mahmudul Hasan, M. Aminul I. Joarder, Rokebul H. Mazumdar, Nayeemun Akter, Ferdous Alam, Rajib Chowdhury, M. Shaukat Ali, Emdadul Hoque
    International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(12): 2096.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and airway management of postoperative retropharyngeal hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
    Yang Tian, Xixi Jia, Gang Li, Yongzheng Han, Xiangyang Guo, Min Li, Yinyin Qu, Mao Xu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening patients requiring secondary lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a nationwide sample cohort study
    Hangeul Park, Juhee Lee, Yunhee Choi, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sum Kim, Young-Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Chi Heon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for spinal cord surgery
    Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sum Kim, Young-Rak Kim, Kyung-Tae Kim, Ji-hoon Kim, John M. Rhee, Woo-Young Jo, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park, Chi Heon Kim, Barry Kweh
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0305694.     CrossRef
  • Corticosteroid Effects on Upper Esophageal Sphincter Function in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Chih-Jun Lai, Jo-Yu Chen, Jing-Rong Jhuang, Ming-Yen Hsiao, Tyng-Guey Wang, Yu-Chang Yeh, Dar-Ming Lai, Fon-Yih Tsuang
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2024; 106(23): 2241.     CrossRef
  • Limaprost and the Risk of Bleeding: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study
    Eun-Joo Lee, Han Eol Jeong, Yoosoo Chang, Ju-Young Shin
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1490.     CrossRef
  • 8,535 View
  • 214 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Biomechanical Analysis of 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Under Physiologic Loads Using a Finite Element Model
Neurospine. 2022;19(2):385-392.   Published online May 13, 2022
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Biomechanical Analysis of 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Under Physiologic Loads Using a Finite Element Model
Neurospine. 2022;19(2):385-392.   Published online May 13, 2022
Close
Objective
Pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) are 2 common complications after multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We aim to identify the potential biomechanical factors contributing to pseudarthrosis and ASD following 3-level ACDF using a cervical spine finite element model (FEM).
Methods
A validated cervical spine FEM from C2 to C7 was used to study the biomechanical factors in cervical spine intervention. The FEM model was used to simulate a 3-level ACDF with intervertebral spacers and anterior cervical plating with screw fixation from C4 to C7. The model was then constrained at the inferior nodes of the T1 vertebra, and physiological loads were applied at the top vertebra. The pure moment load of 2 Nm was applied in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. A follower axial force of 75 N was applied to reproduce the weight of the cranium and muscle force, was applied using standard procedures. The motion-controlled hybrid protocol was utilized to comprehend the adjustments in the spinal biomechanics.
Results
Our cervical spine FEM demonstrated that the cranial adjacent level (C3–4) had significantly more increase in range of motion (ROM) (+90.38%) compared to the caudal adjacent level at C7–T1 (+70.18%) after C4–7 ACDF, indicating that the cranial adjacent level has more compensatory increase in ROM than the caudal adjacent level, potentially predisposing it to earlier ASD. Within the C4–7 ACDF construct, the C6–7 level had the least robust fixation during fixation compared to C4–5 and C5–6, as reflected by the smallest reduction in ROM compared to intact spine (-71.30% vs. -76.36% and -77.05%, respectively), which potentially predisposes the C6–7 level to higher risk of pseudarthrosis.
Conclusion
Biomechanical analysis of C4–7 ACDF construct using a validated cervical spine FEM indicated that the C3–4 has more compensatory increase in ROM compared to C7–T1, and C6–7 has the least robust fixation under physiological loads. These findings can help spine surgeons to predicate the areas with higher risks of pseudarthrosis and ASD, and thus developing corresponding strategies to mitigate these risks and provide appropriate preoperative counseling to patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Finite Element Study of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Constructs Near Cervicothoracic Junction—Is T2 Modeling Necessary?
    J. A. Febin Chris Asir, D. Davidson Jebaseelan, Aju Bosco, Balaji Harinathan, Narayan Yoganandan
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical Analysis Comparison of Different Cervical Posterior Screw Fixation Techniques: A Finite Element Study
    Joonoh Seo, Woo-Seok Jung, Tae Hyun Park, Sung-Jae Lee, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Byung Ho Lee
    Neurospine.2026; 23(1): 187.     CrossRef
  • Approach to assess the effect of sagittal cervical alignment on three-dimensional movement of the cervical spine in spondylosis patients
    Jiangpeng Gu, Xiaoman Wang, Xujing Chen, Zunan Dong, Wei Guo, Wei Feng, Chaoqun Ye, Fei Wang, Xiaomin Liu
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evolving trends in anterior cervical spine surgery: a decade-long shift towards standalone constructs
    Nolan M. Reinhart, Jackson P. Tate, Zachary Salas, William F. Sherman, Mathew Cyriac
    Current Orthopaedic Practice.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI after Cervical Spine Decompression and Fusion Surgery: Technical Considerations, Expected Findings, and Complications
    Frederik Abel, Ek T. Tan, Yenpo Lin, J. Levi Chazen, Darren R. Lebl, Darryl B. Sneag
    Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of heterotopic ossification on the cervical spine with offset of the artificial disc – A finite element study
    Balaji Harinathan, Davidson Jebaseelan, Hemkar Sharma, Lenin Babu, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan, Narayan Yoganandan
    Medical Engineering & Physics.2025; 141: 104356.     CrossRef
  • Fusion Sequence and Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Hyun Woong Mun, Jong Joo Lee, Hyun Chul Shin, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Woo Kim, Jae Keun Oh
    Neurosurgery.2025; 97(5): 1153.     CrossRef
  • A First Step Toward Patient-Specific Cervical Spine Finite Element Modeling Approaches for Military and Civilian Applications
    Narayan Yoganandan, Aditya Vedantam, Balaji Harinathan, Davidson Jebaseelan, Amit Bagchi
    Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of a CT-based 3D finite element model of the whole cervical spine with occiput: Insights into sagittal balance, disc pressure, and facet joint forces
    Hu Chen, Lu Cao, Yinghua He, Hao Sun, Qiang Tu
    World Neurosurgery: X.2025; 28: 100543.     CrossRef
  • Does Aspirin Use Influence Rates of Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Kevin T. Kim, Ziam Khan, Joseph Stains, Timothy Chryssikos
    Global Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Finite element analysis of a new preoperative traction for cervical kyphosis: suspensory traction
    Hongyu Chen, Tianchi Wu, Shengfa Pan, Li Zhang, Yanbin Zhao, Xin Chen, Yu Sun, William W. Lu, Feifei Zhou
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.2024; 62(9): 2867.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery
    Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai
    Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 606.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic Characteristics of Caudal Segment in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Bony Buttress Formation
    Chang Hwa Ham, Joo Han Kim, Youn-Kwan Park, Woo-Keun Kwon, Hong Joo Moon
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1241.     CrossRef
  • Comparing adjacent segment biomechanics between anterior and posterior cervical fusion using patient-specific finite element modeling
    Balaji Harinathan, Davidson Jebaseelan, Narayan Yoganandan, Aditya Vedantam
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(6): 777.     CrossRef
  • Spinal Cord Stress After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Results from a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model
    Aditya Vedantam, Yuvaraj Purushothaman, Balaji Harinathan, Stephen Scripp, Matthew D. Budde, Narayan Yoganandan
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering.2023; 51(5): 1040.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanik der HWS und ihre anatomischen Grundlagen
    Sebastian Decker, Sabine Roth, Ralph Gaulke, Stephan Sehmisch, Heiko Koller
    Die Wirbelsäule.2023; 07(02): 94.     CrossRef
  • Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling
    Chang-Hwan Ahn, Sungwook Kang, Mingoo Cho, Seong-Hun Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Inbo Han, Chul-Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Noh, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Jong-Moon Hwang
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,919 View
  • 239 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Role of Gender in Improvement of Depressive Symptoms Among Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Procedures
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):217-225.   Published online March 31, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Role of Gender in Improvement of Depressive Symptoms Among Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Procedures
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):217-225.   Published online March 31, 2021
Close
Objective
There is a scarcity of research evaluating gender differences in depressive symptoms among patients undergoing cervical surgery. This study investigated gender differences with regard to depressive symptom severity, measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), in patients following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or artificial disc replacement (ADR).
Methods
A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for eligible spine surgeries. Depressive symptom severity was evaluated by PHQ-9 at both preand postoperative timepoints (e.g. , 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). A chi-square test and Student t-test evaluated differences between the gender for demographic and operative variables where appropriate. Differences between the gender subgroup mean PHQ-9 scores were assessed using a t-test pre- and postoperatively (e.g. , 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year) and a paired t-test was used to assess differences from preoperative scores at each postoperative time point.
Results
A total of 170 subjects underwent 125 ACDFs and 45 ADRs. Both pre- and postoperative timepoints demonstrated no significant differences between mean PHQ-9 scores by gender. Female patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PHQ-9 scores at 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, but not through 2 years. Male patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PHQ-9 scores at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
Conclusion
Although there were no significant differences between mean PHQ-9 score between the genders, there was a difference in magnitude of improvement. Females had a significant improvement in depressive symptom severity over baseline at the 6- and 12-week timepoints only, whereas males had significant improvement through 2 years postoperatively.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Surgical interventions for degenerative cervical disease: Impact on patient quality of life, mental health, pain relief, and spiritual health
    Ching-Ya Huang, Cheng-Shyuan Rau, Jo-Chien Lin, Shiun-Yuan Hsu, Ching-Hua Hsieh
    Heliyon.2025; 11(1): e41555.     CrossRef
  • The use of the Core Yellow Flags Index for the assessment of psychosocial distress in patients undergoing surgery of the cervical spine
    Francine Mariaux, Achim Elfering, Tamás F. Fekete, François Porchet, Daniel Haschtmann, Raluca Reitmeir, Markus Loibl, Dezsö Jeszenszky, Frank S. Kleinstück, Anne F. Mannion
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(6): 2269.     CrossRef
  • Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Depression Following Vascular Surgery Procedures
    Blake L. Findley, Teryn A. Holeman, Benjamin S. Brooke
    Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 301: 54.     CrossRef
  • Workers compensation patients experiencing depression report meaningful improvement in mental health scores after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Kern Singh
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2022; 34: 102020.     CrossRef
  • 6,253 View
  • 100 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Validation for Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):155-162.   Published online March 31, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Validation for Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):155-162.   Published online March 31, 2021
Close
Objective
Our study aims to evaluate the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) with legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods
A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for ACDF surgeries performed between May 2015 and September 2017. Inclusion criteria were primary elective, single- or multilevel ACDFs for degenerative spinal pathology. Patients lacking preoperative or 2-year PROMIS PF surveys were excluded. Mean scores were calculated for visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and PROMIS PF at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient were utilized to evaluate score improvement and PROM relationships respectively.
Results
The 50 subject cohort was 60.0% male, 50% obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and had an average age of 50.9 years. Significant improvements were demonstrated for VAS neck and NDI at all postoperative timepoints (p < 0.001) and for SF-12 and PROMIS PF at all timepoints except 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.025). VAS arm improvement was seen up to 1 year (p ≤ 0.016). PROMIS PF demonstrated strong correlations with NDI and SF-12 PCS at all evaluated timepoints and with VAS neck at all postoperative timepoints except 6 weeks (all p < 0.01).
Conclusion
PROMIS PF was strongly correlated with pain, disability, and physical function up to 2 years for patients undergoing ACDF. Our results support the long-term validity of PROMIS PF for measurement of patient-reported physical function among ACDF cohorts.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement
    Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Preoperative Physical Function Scores on Outcomes After Single-level Cervical Disc Replacement
    Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(7): E376.     CrossRef
  • Are Mildly Disabled Patients Appropriate for Spine Bundles? An Application of the Operative Value Index
    Advith Sarikonda, Ashmal Sami, D. Mitchell Self, Emily Isch, Alexander Zavitsanos, Antony A. Fuleihan, Ayra Khan, Conor Dougherty, Danyal Quraishi, Jack Jallo, Joshua Heller, Srinivas K. Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, James Harrop, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Ahilan S
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123797.     CrossRef
  • Rates of cervical spine surgery and repeat epidural injections after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with cervical radiculopathy utilizing a large national database
    Andrew R. Stephens, Ramzi El-Hassan, Ashley Rogerson
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2025; 4(4): 100651.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative evaluation of upper extremity strength recovery after cervical epidural block: a retrospective study
    Dong Hyuck Kim, Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim
    Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2025; 42: 73.     CrossRef
  • Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh
    Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500.     CrossRef
  • Severe Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor of Early Readmission and Nonhome Discharge After Cervical Disc Replacement
    Tejas Subramanian, Daniel Shinn, Pratyush Shahi, Izzet Akosman, Troy Amen, Omri Maayan, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Junho Song, Sidhant Dalal, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz Qureshi
    Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 890.     CrossRef
  • The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Andrea M. Roca, Fatima N. Anwar, Alexandra C. Loya, Srinath S. Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C. Wolf, Ishan Khosla, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 180: e756.     CrossRef
  • Completion Rates for PROMIS Physical Function Surveys Compared with Legacy PROMs in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
    Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Cara E. Geoghegan, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh
    Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neck Disability at Presentation Influences Long-Term Clinical Improvement for Neck Pain, Arm Pain, Disability, and Physical Function in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Andrew P. Collins, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 163: e663.     CrossRef
  • Level-specific Perioperative and Clinical Outcome Comparison: Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 in Patients With Myeloradiculopathy
    Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Alexander W. Parsons, Michael C. Prabhu, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2022; 30(17): e1137.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of the Preoperative Severity of Neck Pain on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Nisheka Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael Prabhu, Kanhai S. Amin, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 165: e337.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Physical Function Association With Mental Health Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Thomas S. Brundage, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Kern Singh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(10): E559.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion
    Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875.     CrossRef
  • 9,490 View
  • 105 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
Neurospine. 2020;17(4):896-901.   Published online December 31, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
Neurospine. 2020;17(4):896-901.   Published online December 31, 2020
Close
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare all-cause reoperation rates and costs in nonelderly patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft versus synthetic cages for degenerative pathology.
Methods
We queried a private claims database to identify adult patients ( ≤ 65 years) who underwent single-level ACDF in a hospital setting using either structural allograft or a synthetic cage (polyetheretherketone, metal, or hybrid device), from 2010 to 2016. The rate of all-cause reoperations at 2 years were compared between the 2 groups. Index hospitalization costs and 90-day complication rates were also compared. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 26,754 patients were included in the study. 11,514 patients (43%) underwent ACDF with structural allograft and 15,240 (57%) underwent ACDF with a synthetic cage. The patients in the allograft group were younger and more likely to be male. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to 90-day complications including: wound dehiscence, dysphagia, dysphonia, and hematoma/seroma. In the 2-year postoperative period, the synthetic cage group had a significantly higher rate of allcause reoperation compared to the allograft group (9.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002). Index hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the synthetic cage group compared to those in the allograft group ($23,475 vs. $20,836, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Structural allograft is associated with lower all-cause reoperation rates and lower index costs in nonelderly patients undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative pathology. It is important to understand this data as we transition toward value-based care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Revision Surgery after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate vs Stand-Alone Cage over 2 to 5 Year Follow-Up
    Wesley M. Durand, Rajan Khanna, Gabriel I. Nazario-Ferrer, Sang H. Lee, Richard L. Skolasky, Amit Jain
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(4): 2014.     CrossRef
  • Considering the Effects of Age and Patient Factors on Subsidence and Implant Selection in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Jeffrey B. Weinreb, Jake Carbone, Hershil Patel, Amit Ratanpal, Rohan I. Suresh, Tyler J. Pease, Ryan A. Smith, Joseph Blommer, Anthony K. Chiu, Idris Amin, Louis J. Bivona, Julio J. Jauregui, Daniel L. Cavanaugh, Eugene Y. Koh, Charles A. Sansur, Steven
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reoperation Rate Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Standalone Cage Versus Anterior Plating in a Large Matched Cohort
    Adeesya Gausper, Andrew M. Miller, Vivien Chan, Suhas K. Etigunta, Andy M. Liu, David Skaggs, Tiffany Perry, Corey Walker, Alexander Tuchman
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Structural Allograft is Associated With Lower Postoperative Health Care Utilization and Reoperations Compared With Cage Implants
    Andrew Y. Powers, Darren Z. Nin, Ya-Wen Chen, Ruijia Niu, David H. Kim, David C. Chang, Raymond W. Hwang
    Operative Neurosurgery.2024; 26(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Anterior cervical decompression and fusion at one and two levels: trends and factors associated with structural allograft versus synthetic cages
    Lucas Kim, Jonathan N. Grauer
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 17: 100310.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and radiological outcomes of non-window-type bioactive glass–ceramic cage in single-level ACDF versus PEEK cage filled with autologous bone
    Ji-Won Kwon, Yong Ho Lee, Byung Ho Lee, Jae Hong Kim, Kyung Soo Suk
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis
    Tu Thai Bao Nguyen, Nguyen Anh Duy Tran, Huu Dat Nguyen, Khai Duy Lam, Thanh Tan Nguyen, Yi-Jie Kuo, Yu-Pin Chen
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 191: e730.     CrossRef
  • A Five-Year Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Synthetic Cage Versus Allograft Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Micheal Raad, Amy L. Xu, Carlos Ortiz-Babilonia, Majd Marrache, Wesley M. Durand, Marc Greenberg, Amit Jain
    Spine.2023; 48(5): 330.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes and Cost Profiles for Cage and Allograft Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures in the Adult Population: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Adrian John Rodrigues, Kunal Varshneya, Martin Nikolaus Stienen, Ethan Schonfeld, Khoi Duc Than, Anand Veeravagu
    Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(4): 620.     CrossRef
  • Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling
    Chang-Hwan Ahn, Sungwook Kang, Mingoo Cho, Seong-Hun Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Inbo Han, Chul-Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Noh, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Jong-Moon Hwang
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries
    Alan T. Villavicencio, E. Lee Nelson, Sharad Rajpal, Kara Beasley, Sigita Burneikiene
    Spine.2022; 47(15): 1043.     CrossRef
  • Optimization of cervical cage and analysis of its base material: A finite element study
    Elahe Jalilvand, Nabiolah Abollfathi, Mohsen Khajehzhadeh, Mojtaba Hassani-Gangaraj
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2022; 236(11): 1613.     CrossRef
  • Endplate-specific fusion rate 1 year after surgery for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF)
    Hyun Jun Jang, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Dong Kyu Chin
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2022; 164(12): 3173.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Subsidence on Segmental and Global Lordosis at Long-term Follow-up After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Akiro H. Duey, Christopher Gonzalez, Eric A. Geng, Pierce J. Ferriter Jr, Ashley M. Rosenberg, Ula N. Isleem, Bashar Zaidat, Paul M. Al-Attar, Jonathan S. Markowitz, Jun S. Kim, Samuel K. Cho
    Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 927.     CrossRef
  • 8,298 View
  • 118 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Perioperative Outcomes in 17,947 Patients Undergoing 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Conditions: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
Neurospine. 2020;17(4):871-878.   Published online December 31, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Perioperative Outcomes in 17,947 Patients Undergoing 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Conditions: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
Neurospine. 2020;17(4):871-878.   Published online December 31, 2020
Close
Objective
To compare the perioperative morbidity of 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with that of 1-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative conditions.
Methods
A retrospective study of the 2005–2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients undergoing 2-level ACDF and 1-level ACCF was performed. Patient data included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), functional status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification. Hospital data included: operative time and length of hospital stay (LOS). Thirty-day outcome data included: any, serious, and minor adverse events, return to the operating room, readmission, and mortality. After propensity matching for age, sex, ASA PS classification, functional status, and BMI, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between the 2 propensity-matched subcohorts. Finally, multivariate logistic regression that additionally controlled for operative time was performed to compare the 2 propensity-matched subcohorts.
Results
A total of 17,497 cases were identified, with 90.20% undergoing 2-level ACDF and 9.80% undergoing 1-level ACCF. Patients undergoing 2-level ACDF were younger, more likely to be female, had higher functional status, and had shorter operative time and LOS (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, cases undergoing 1-level ACCF had a statistically significant higher rate of serious adverse events (p = 0.005). This difference was no longer significant after controlling for operative time.
Conclusion
While there was noted to be additional morbidity in 1-level ACCF cases relative to 2-level ACDF cases, the lack of difference once controlling for the surgical time supports using the procedure that best accomplishes the surgical objectives.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity
    Karma Barot, Miguel A. Ruiz-Cardozo, Som Singh, Gabriel Trevino, Michael R. Kann, Samuel Brehm, Tim Bui, Karan Joseph, Rujvee Patel, Angela Hardi, Alexander T. Yahanda, Julio J. Jauregui, Magalie Cadieux, Brenton Pennicooke, Camilo A. Molina
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 1390.     CrossRef
  • Association of malnutrition with surgical outcomes after spine surgery for spinal epidural abscess
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Paul Serrato, Shaila D. Ghanekar, Lucas P. Mitre, Syed I. Khalid, Sheng-fu Larry Lo, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2025; 249: 108754.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion vs. Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for 2-Level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
    Aman Verma, Anil Kumar, Utsav Anand, Siddharth Sekhar Sethy, Aakash Jain, Vibhor Abrol, Kaustubh Ahuja, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal
    JBJS Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Recent Efficacy of Two Surgical Techniques for Multi-Stage Radiculopathy Cervical Spondylosis
    斌 闫
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(04): 758.     CrossRef
  • Composite RAI, Malnutrition, and Anemia Model Superiorly Predicts 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Paul Serrato, Shaila D. Ghanekar, Justice Hansen, Ethan D. L. Brown, Syed I. Khalid, Daniel Schneider, Sheng-fu Larry Lo, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(15): 5379.     CrossRef
  • Utilization of Machine Learning to Model Important Features of 30-day Readmissions following Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Column Tumors: The Influence of Frailty
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Andrew B. Koo, Benjamin C. Reeves, James L. Cross, Andrew Hersh, Astrid C. Hengartner, Aditya V. Karhade, Zach Pennington, Oluwaseun O. Akinduro, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Ziya L. Gokaslan, John H. Shin, Ehud Mendel, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(4): 1227.     CrossRef
  • Association of Malnutrition with Surgical and Hospital Outcomes after Spine Surgery for Spinal Metastases: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study of 1613 Patients
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, John Havlik, Benjamin C. Reeves, Josiah J. Z. Sherman, Samuel Craft, Paul Serrato, Sumaiya Sayeed, Andrew B. Koo, Syed I. Khalid, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H. Shin, Ehud Mendel, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(6): 1542.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010–2020
    Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu Choi, Paramveer Singh Birring, Joshua Lee, Sohaib Zafar Hashmi, Nitin Narain Bhatia, Yu-po Lee
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • Does the novel artificial cervical joint complex resolve the conflict between stability and mobility after anterior cervical surgery? a finite element study
    Bing Meng, Xiong Zhao, Xin-Li Wang, Jian Wang, Chao Xu, Wei Lei
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Safety of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries, a single center comparative matched analysis
    Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Aman Singh, Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö, Simon Blixt, Vasilios Stenimahitis, Gunnar Nilsson, Paul Gerdhem, Erik Edström, Adrian Elmi-Terander
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of inpatient opioid consumption on postoperative outcomes after open posterior spinal fusion for adult spine deformity
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Mani Ratnesh S. Sandhu, Benjamin C. Reeves, Isaac G. Freedman, Andrew B. Koo, Christina Jayaraj, Astrid C. Hengartner, John Havlik, Andrew M. Hersh, Zach Pennington, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H. Shin, Ehud Mendel, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Spine Deformity.2023; 11(2): 439.     CrossRef
  • Geriatric relationship with inpatient opioid consumption and hospital outcomes after open posterior spinal fusion for adult spine deformity
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Mani Ratnesh S. Sandhu, Benjamin C. Reeves, Josiah J.Z. Sherman, Samuel Craft, Mica Williams, John H. Shin, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2023; 224: 107532.     CrossRef
  • Correction and Maintenance of Cervical Alignment
    Chad Campion, Charles H. Crawford, Steven D. Glassman, Fehmi Berkay, Tino Mkorombindo, Leah Y. Carreon
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(4): E118.     CrossRef
  • Association of frailty with healthcare resource utilization after open thoracic/thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Andrew B. Koo, Josiah J. Z. Sherman, Margot Sarkozy, Benjamin C. Reeves, Samuel Craft, Sumaiya Sayeed, Mani Ratnesh S. Sandhu, Andrew M. Hersh, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H. Shin, Ehud Mendel, Daniel M. Sciubba
    European Spine Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Tangyiheng Chen, Yujie Wang, Hong Zhou, Cheng Lin, Xuefeng Li, Huilin Yang, Yijie Liu, Weimin Jiang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI T2WI High Signal Is a Risk Factor for Perioperative Complications in Patients with Cervical Spondylosis with Spinal Cord Compression: A Propensity Matching Score Analysis
    Shengsheng Huang, Xuhua Sun, Liyi Chen, Ming Yi, Tuo Liang, Jie Jiang, Jiarui Chen, Chong Liu, Xinli Zhan, Kai Uwe Lewandrowski
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Automatic Localization and Brand Detection of Cervical Spine Hardware on Radiographs Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning
    Raman Dutt, Dylan Mendonca, Huai Ming Phen, Samuel Broida, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Judy Gichoya, Imon Banerjee, Tim Yoon, Hari Trivedi
    Radiology: Artificial Intelligence.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Marfan syndrome and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients have similar 90-day postoperative outcomes and 5-year reoperation rates after spinal deformity surgery
    Peter Y. Joo, Dennis L. Caruana, Michael J. Gouzoulis, Harold G. Moore, Justin R. Zhu, Bijan Ameri, Jonathan N. Grauer
    Spine Deformity.2022; 10(5): 1169.     CrossRef
  • Critical analysis of the evaluation of postoperative dysphagia following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Matthew Kaufman, Jennifer Shearer, Claudia I. Cabrera, Morgan Terry, Elizabeth Jackson, Rachel Kominsky, Innocent Njoku, Todd Otteson, Christopher Furey, N. Scott Howard
    American Journal of Otolaryngology.2022; 43(3): 103466.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Philip K. Louie, Venu M. Nemani, Jean-Christophe A. Leveque
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(10): 440.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanics of a novel artificial cervical vertebra from an in vivo caprine cervical spine non-fusion model
    Jun Dong, Baobao Liang, Yuan Sun, Xi Li, Pei Han, Chen Wang, Yabing Song, Hao Wu, Ruoxi Liu, Sihua Huang, Sen Yu, Lei Jin, Zhentao Yu, Liying Fan, Huanjin Song, Chun Zhang, Xijing He
    Journal of Orthopaedic Translation.2022; 37: 61.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of postoperative outcomes in patients with and without osteoporosis undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Alexander J. Kammien, Anoop R. Galivanche, Peter Y. Joo, Ali Elaydi, Peter Whang, Comron Saifi, Jonathan N. Grauer, Arya Varthi
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2022; 12: 100174.     CrossRef
  • Launching a quality improvement project in neurosurgery: How to get started
    Matthew T. Neal, Alexandra E. Richards, Kara L. Curley, Mark K. Lyons
    Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2021; 25: 101206.     CrossRef
  • Effects of preoperative nutritional status on complications and readmissions after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis: A propensity-score analysis
    Aladine A. Elsamadicy, John Havlik, Benjamin C. Reeves, Andrew B. Koo, Josiah Sherman, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H. Shin, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2021; 211: 107017.     CrossRef
  • 8,482 View
  • 126 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Effect of the Presence and Type of Plate Augmentation on Postoperative Dysphagia Among Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Spondylosis: A Randomized Trial
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):174-183.   Published online March 31, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Effect of the Presence and Type of Plate Augmentation on Postoperative Dysphagia Among Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Spondylosis: A Randomized Trial
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):174-183.   Published online March 31, 2020
Close
Objective
To determine the effect of anterior plating on postoperative dysphagia (POD) among adult patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylosis and determine the potential role of demographic and clinical characteristics in the development of POD.
Methods
Consecutive adults undergoing an elective, single-level, ACDF were randomly assigned to receive a stand-alone CoRoent Cage or a CoRoent Cage with a Helix, or HelixMini plate. Patients with a history of cervical spine surgery were excluded. M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and Bazaz questionnaires were completed at regular intervals for 12 months postoperatively.
Results
Twenty-five patients were recruited over a 2-year period, with 8 allocated to receive a stand-alone cage, 5 to receive a cage and Helix Mini plate, and 12 to receive a cage and Helix plate. The POD rate was 68% at 48 hours, before falling to 16% at 6 and 12 months. A longer retraction time was observed in the Helix plate group compared to the stand-alone cage group (7.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–15.63; p = 0.046), although there was no difference in the incidence or severity of dysphagia between cohorts at any timepoint. With the exception of body mass index, there was no difference in patients with and without dysphagia, and each of the interventions was equally efficacious with respect to clinical and radiological endpoints.
Conclusion
Dysphagia is a common consequence of ACDF and, while the placement of a large plate results in longer retraction time, it was not associated with higher rates of dysphagia. Further research is required to identify both patient-specific and surgical contributors to this complication.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Outcomes of different zero-profile spacers in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative disk disease
    Xu Xiong, Jia-Ming Liu, Wei-Wen Chen, Zi-Hao Liu, Rong-Ping Zhou, Jiang-Wei Chen, Zhi-Li Liu
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(7): 2448.     CrossRef
  • Dysphagia as a Postoperative Complication of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Georgios Tsalimas, Dimitrios Stergios Evangelopoulos, Ioannis S Benetos, Spiros Pneumaticos
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using Swallowing Quality of Life to Compare Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Shruthi Mohan, Caroline N Jadczak, Elliot D K Cha, Conor P Lynch, Madhav R Patel, Kevin C Jacob, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C Prabhu, Nisheka N Vanjani, Kern Singh
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2022; 7(1): 140.     CrossRef
  • 8,876 View
  • 148 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):398-406.   Published online February 5, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):398-406.   Published online February 5, 2020
Close
Objective
Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods
After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g. , ≥ 35.0, < 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement.
Results
Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement
    Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161.     CrossRef
  • New Patient PROMIS Scores of Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain Predict Time to Elective Spine Surgery
    Justin E. Kung, Chase Gauthier, Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Richard A. Bidwell, David G. Edelman, Heidi C. Ventresca, J. Benjamin Jackson, Shari Cui, Gregory Grabowski
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2025; 9(2): 237.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Utility and Patient Compliance With Mobile Applications for Home-based Rehabilitation Following Cervical Spine Fusion
    Arpitha Pamula, Katie Lee, Alex Tang, Tan Chen
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure
    Andrew R. Stephens, Nicholas R. Bender, Jim M. Snyder, Rajeev K. Patel, Ramzi El-Hassan
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2024; 3(4): 100528.     CrossRef
  • The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression
    Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Grant A. Park, Jessica R. Gheewala, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(1): E6.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System With Traditional Outcome Metrics in Spine Surgery
    Emily Arciero, Sohil Desai, Josephine Coury, Puneet Gupta, David P. Trofa, Zeeshan Sardar, Joseph Lombardi
    JBJS Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Are We Considering the Whole Patient? The Impact of Physical and Mental Health on the Outcomes of Spine Care
    Justin J. Turcotte, Samantha Baxter, Karen Pipkin, Chad M. Patton
    Spine.2023; 48(10): 720.     CrossRef
  • Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh
    Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500.     CrossRef
  • Association of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures With Injection and Surgical Treatment Response in Patients With De Quervain Tenosynovitis
    Gilbert Smolyak, Bowen Qiu, Courtney Marie Cora Jones, Constantinos Ketonis
    The Journal of Hand Surgery.2023; 48(11): 1098.     CrossRef
  • Association between serum multi-protein biomarker profile and real-world disability in multiple sclerosis
    Wen Zhu, Chenyi Chen, Lili Zhang, Tammy Hoyt, Elizabeth Walker, Shruthi Venkatesh, Fujun Zhang, Ferhan Qureshi, John F Foley, Zongqi Xia
    Brain Communications.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Mark J. Lambrechts, Nicholas D. D'Antonio, Brian A. Karamian, Gregory R. Toci, Matthew Sherman, Jose A. Canseco, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Alan S. Hilibrand, Gregory D. Schroeder
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(10): 1610.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedure Duration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Brian A. Karamian, Paul D. Minetos, Hannah A. Levy, Gregory R. Toci, Mark J. Lambrechts, Jose A. Canseco, Derek G. Ju, Ariana A. Reyes, Daniel R. Bowles, I. David Kaye, Mark F. Kurd, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R.
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e548.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Early Clinically Significant Improvement Among Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Multivariate Analysis
    Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Hanna Pawlowski, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh
    Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge
    Rafa Rahman, Sara Wallam, Bo Zhang, Rahul Sachdev, Emmanuel L. McNeely, Khaled M. Kebaish, Lee H. Riley, David B. Cohen, Amit Jain, Sang H. Lee, Daniel M. Sciubba, Richard L. Skolasky, Brian J. Neuman
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 150: e600.     CrossRef
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Validation for Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
    James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Shruthi Mohan, Caroline N. Jadczak, David P. Matichak, Kern Singh
    Neurospine.2021; 18(1): 155.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Tolerability of Stromal Vascular Fraction Combined with β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Phase I Clinical Trial
    Kyoung-Tae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Un Yong Choi, Sang Heon Lim, Young Jae Kim, Seil Sohn, Seung Hun Sheen, Chan Yeong Heo, Inbo Han
    Cells.2020; 9(10): 2250.     CrossRef
  • 8,686 View
  • 128 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Evaluation of Postoperative Mental Health Outcomes in Patients Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):184-189.   Published online February 5, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Evaluation of Postoperative Mental Health Outcomes in Patients Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2020;17(1):184-189.   Published online February 5, 2020
Close
Objective
To assess the relationship of preoperative physical function, as measured by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), to improvement in mental health, as evaluated by Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods
Patients undergoing primary ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified based on preoperative PROMIS PF scores. PROMIS PF cohorts were tested for an association with demographic characteristics and perioperative variables using chi-square analysis and multivariate linear regression. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the association between PROMIS PF cohorts and improvement in SF-12 MCS.
Results
A total of 129 one- to 3-level ACDF patients were included: 73 had PROMIS PF < 40 (“low PROMIS”) and 56 had PROMIS PF ≥ 40 (“high PROMIS”). The low PROMIS cohort reported worse mental health preoperatively and at all postoperative timepoints except for 1 year. Both cohorts had similar changes in mental health from baseline through the 6-month follow-up. However, at 1 year. postoperatively, the low PROMIS cohort had a statistically greater change in mental health score.
Conclusion
Patients with worse preoperative physical function reported significantly worse preoperative and postoperative mental health. However, patients with worse preoperative physical function made significantly greater improvements in mental health from baseline. This suggests that patients with worse preoperative physical function can still expect significant improvements in mental health following surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Influence of Preoperative Physical Function Scores on Outcomes After Single-level Cervical Disc Replacement
    Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(7): E376.     CrossRef
  • The effect of preoperative psychological state on postoperative outcomes of anterior cervical approach in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective case‒control study
    Chunzeng Wang, Youdi Xue, Zhifa Lun, Ma Chao, Guangwang Liu, Xuan Yue, Zhaochuan Zhang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Depression and anxiety in cervical degenerative disc disease: Who are susceptible?
    Dacheng Sang, Bowei Xiao, Tianhua Rong, Bingxuan Wu, Wei Cui, Jianhao Zhang, Yue Zhang, Baoge Liu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Preoperative 12-item Short Form Mental Composite Scores on Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Disc Replacement
    James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(6): E263.     CrossRef
  • Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Omolabake O. Oyetayo, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Keith R. MacGregor, Eileen Zheng, Fatima N. Anwar, Andrea M. Roca, Vincent P. Federico, Dustin H. Massel, Gregory D. Lopez, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2023; 165(11): 3531.     CrossRef
  • Poor patient-reported mental health correlates with inferior patient-reported outcome measures following cervical disc replacement
    Keith R. MacGregor, Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Eileen Zheng, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2023; 165(11): 3511.     CrossRef
  • Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression
    Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Max A. Ribot, Alexander W. Parsons, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e649.     CrossRef
  • Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Max A. Ribot, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 157: e111.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients”
    Moon-Jun Sohn
    Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedure Duration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Brian A. Karamian, Paul D. Minetos, Hannah A. Levy, Gregory R. Toci, Mark J. Lambrechts, Jose A. Canseco, Derek G. Ju, Ariana A. Reyes, Daniel R. Bowles, I. David Kaye, Mark F. Kurd, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R.
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e548.     CrossRef
  • 7,697 View
  • 125 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparing Allografts to Autografts for Maintenance of Cervical Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Anterior Cervical Plating
Neurospine. 2019;16(3):618-625.   Published online February 23, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparing Allografts to Autografts for Maintenance of Cervical Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Anterior Cervical Plating
Neurospine. 2019;16(3):618-625.   Published online February 23, 2019
Close
Objective
Current literature has not shown if using either allograft or autograft differentially affects postoperative cervical sagittal parameters. The goal of this study was to compare sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft versus autograft.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent single-level ACDF was conducted. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up radiographic assessments were conducted and included: change in C2–7 lordosis, T1 slope, levels fused, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), fusion mass lordosis, and proximal and distal adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using the Neck Disability Index and visual analogue scale scores for neck and arm.
Results
A total of 404 patients were assessed; 353 using allograft and 51 using autograft. No significant differences existed in demographics. Cervical lordosis improved in both groups without significant changes in SVA. Autograft group had a significantly greater amount of lordosis at the proximal segment on immediate postoperative radiographs and less overall cervical lordosis at final follow-up. Sagittal parameters were similar at each time point without significant changes between the 3-time points. No significant differences existed in radiographic ASD or reoperation rates. Fusion rates exceeded 96% in both groups. No significant differences existed between preoperative, postoperative, or change in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Sagittal alignment is maintained following ACDF when using either allograft or autograft. Radiographic evidence of ASD is present in both groups; however, this was not considered clinically significant, given low rates of pseudarthrosis or reoperation. No significant differences exist between groups in terms of patient-reported outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A nationwide registry study of surgical and patient-reported outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Part 1 - Synthetic cages versus autologous crista bone grafts
    Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Sruthi Ranganathan, Daniel de Wilde, Alec Jonason, Victor E. Staartjes, Patrick Vigren, Elias Atallah, Erik Edström, Adrian Elmi-Terander
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(2): 510.     CrossRef
  • Correlation analysis between preoperative odontoid incidence and clinical outcomes 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Yan Gong, Hao Liu, Yanchi Gan, Jiahui He, Zelin Zhou, Hang Zhuo, Yu Liu, De Liang, Hui Ren, Xiaobing Jiang, Zhaojun Cheng
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Complications in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Osteobiologics Other than Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Systematic Review
    Juan P. Cabrera, Neha Agarwal, Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto, Yabin Wu, Christopher Martin, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C. Wang, Hans Jörg Meisel
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(2_suppl): 86.     CrossRef
  • Variation of Odontoid Incidence According to Age in Asymptomatic Children
    Yuwang Du, Weiyou Chen, Hongyuan Xu, Xiao Liang, Chongyang Wang, Hongyu Qin, Hua Jiang
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 190: e496.     CrossRef
  • Which Radiographic Parameter Can Aid in Deciding Optimal Allograft Height for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Jae Jun Yang, Sehan Park, Dong-Min Kim
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(3): 75.     CrossRef
  • Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parisa Azimi, Taravat Yazdanian, Edward C. Benzel, Yong Hai, Ali Montazeri
    European Spine Journal.2021; 30(6): 1411.     CrossRef
  • Residual Motion and Graft Type Do Not Influence Patient-reported Outcomes Following One- or Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Brandon K. Couch, Richard A. Wawrose, Clarissa M. LeVasseur, Samuel W. Pitcairn, Jeremy D. Shaw, William F. Donaldson, Joon Y. Lee, William J. Anderst
    Spine.2021; 46(15): E817.     CrossRef
  • Efficiency of minimal oblique resection of the uncinate process during an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Byoung Hun Lee, Jong Hwa Park, Jong Young Lee, Hong Jun Jeon, Seung-Woo Park
    Medicine.2021; 100(31): e26790.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation
    Hyung Cheol Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Du Su Kim, Jeffrey S. Roh, Tae Woo Kim, Seong Bae An, Hyeong Seok Jeon, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha
    Neurosurgical Review.2020; 43(5): 1423.     CrossRef
  • 9,654 View
  • 215 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Predicting Surgical Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2018;15(4):329-337.   Published online December 17, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Predicting Surgical Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2018;15(4):329-337.   Published online December 17, 2018
Close
Objective
Machine learning algorithms excel at leveraging big data to identify complex patterns that can be used to aid in clinical decision-making. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the performance of machine learning models in predicting postoperative complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods
Artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest decision tree (RF) models were trained on a multicenter data set of patients undergoing ACDF to predict surgical complications based on readily available patient data. Following training, these models were compared to the predictive capability of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification.
Results
A total of 20,879 patients were identified as having undergone ACDF. Following exclusion criteria, patients were divided into 14,615 patients for training and 6,264 for testing data sets. ANN and LR consistently outperformed ASA physical status classification in predicting every complication (p < 0.05). The ANN outperformed LR in predicting venous thromboembolism, wound complication, and mortality (p < 0.05). The SVM and RF models were no better than random chance at predicting any of the postoperative complications (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
ANN and LR algorithms outperform ASA physical status classification for predicting individual postoperative complications. Additionally, neural networks have greater sensitivity than LR when predicting mortality and wound complications. With the growing size of medical data, the training of machine learning on these large datasets promises to improve risk prognostication, with the ability of continuously learning making them excellent tools in complex clinical scenarios.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Research: Transformative Impacts and Evolving Ethical Challenges
    Miranda X. Morris, Faris Rustom, Benjamin Chun, David Limon, Niruktha Raghavan, Lifei Guo, Aashish Rajesh
    The American Surgeon™.2026; 92(3): 698.     CrossRef
  • Identifying high healthcare utilizers following cervical spine surgery using comprehensive predictive modeling techniques
    Rushmin Khazanchi, Divy Kumar, Rishi Jain, Mehul Mittal, Anitesh Bajaj, Robert J. Oris, Austin R. Chen, Theodore A. Joaquin, Daniel E. Herrera, Rohan M. Shah, Shravan Asthana, Samuel G. Reyes, Pranav Bajaj, Wellington K. Hsu, Alpesh A. Patel, Srikanth N.
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(1): 84.     CrossRef
  • Künstliche Intelligenz in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie: aktuelle Anwendungen und zukünftige Perspektiven
    Filip Milicevic, Mohamad Agha Mahmoud, Maher Ghandour, Moh’d Yazan Khasawneh, Amir R. Ghasemi, Koroush Kabir, Ümit Mert
    Die Orthopädie.2026; 55(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • Performance of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Outcomes After ACDF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 443 000 Patients
    Lucas P Mitre, Rômulo S Sanglard, Ethan D. L Brown, Shaila D Ghanekar, Paul Serrato, Aladine A Elsamadicy
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for venous thromboembolism risk stratification in surgical patients: a systematic review
    Kavin Shah, Michael Gadelrab, Emily A. Brennan, Maggie L. Westfal, Colleen A. Donahue, John Del Gaizo, Arman Kilic, Thomas Curran
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary
    Alexander T. Yahanda, Karan Joseph, Tim Bui, Jacob K. Greenberg, Wilson Z. Ray, John I. Ogunlade, Daniel Hafez, Nicholas A. Pallotta, Brian J. Neuman, Camilo A. Molina
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 1445.     CrossRef
  • Are AI and VR tools changing spine education and training?
    Melissa Baker, Ronald Lontchi, Zorica Buser
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2025; 5(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Development of a novel machine learning model to automate vertebral column segmentation utilizing biplanar full-body imaging
    Yash Lahoti, Skanda Sai, Wasil Ahmed, Rami Rajjoub, Michael Li, Bashar Zaidat, Samuel K. Cho, Jun S. Kim
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(12): 2803.     CrossRef
  • A machine learning-driven model predicts patient-reported dysphagia after instrumented cervical fusion
    Akash A. Shah, Changhee Lee, Amador Bugarin, Sai K. Devana, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Nelson F. SooHoo, Don Y. Park
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2025; 5(2): 210.     CrossRef
  • Gated recurrent unit with decay has real-time capability for postoperative ileus surveillance and offers cross-hospital transferability
    Xiaoyang Ruan, Sunyang Fu, Heling Jia, Kellie L. Mathis, Cornelius A. Thiels, Schaeferle M. Gavin, Patrick M. Wilson, Curtis B. Storlie, Hongfang Liu
    Communications Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Cancer Complications Using Smartphone Sensor Data: A Prospective Study
    Gabrielė Dargė, Gabrielė Kasputytė, Paulius Savickas, Adomas Bunevičius, Inesa Bunevičienė, Erika Korobeinikova, Domas Vaitiekus, Arturas Inčiūra, Laimonas Jaruševičius, Romas Bunevičius, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Tomas Krilavičius, Elona Juozaitytė
    Applied Sciences.2025; 16(1): 249.     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Spine Care
    Yu Zhang, Man Hu, Wenjie Zhao, Xin Liu, Qing Peng, Bo Meng, Sheng Yang, Xinmin Feng, Liang Zhang
    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.2024; 85(01): 062.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review
    Samuel Adida, Andrew D. Legarreta, Joseph S. Hudson, David McCarthy, Edward Andrews, Regan Shanahan, Suchet Taori, Raj Swaroop Lavadi, Thomas J. Buell, D. Kojo Hamilton, Nitin Agarwal, Peter C. Gerszten
    Neurosurgery.2024; 94(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative adverse events in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery: comparison of three predictive models
    Shuai-Kang Wang, Peng Wang, Zhong-En Li, Xiang-Yu Li, Chao Kong, Shi-Bao Lu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Innovations in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Integrative Technologies
    George Bcharah, Nithin Gupta, Nicholas Panico, Spencer Winspear, Austin Bagley, Morgan Turnow, Randy D'Amico, Alvan-Emeka K. Ukachukwu
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 184: 127.     CrossRef
  • The Evolution of Risk Assessment in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review
    Andy Ton, Danielle Wishart, Jacob R. Ball, Ishan Shah, Kiley Murakami, Matthew P. Ordon, R. Kiran Alluri, Raymond Hah, Michael M. Safaee
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 188: 1.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
    Vasiliki Danilatou, Dimitrios Dimopoulos, Theodoros Kostoulas, James Douketis
    Thrombosis and Haemostasis.2024; 124(11): 1040.     CrossRef
  • Enabling Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery Through Artificial Intelligence
    Nickelas Huffman, Ignacio Pasqualini, Shujaa T. Khan, Alison K. Klika, Matthew E. Deren, Yuxuan Jin, Kyle N. Kunze, Nicolas S. Piuzzi
    JBJS Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting Colonic Neoplasia Surgical Complications: A Machine Learning Approach
    Chibueze A. Nwaiwu, Krissia M. Rivera Perla, Logan B. Abel, Isaac J. Sears, Andrew T. Barton, Race C. Peterson, Yao Z. Liu, Ishaani S. Khatri, Indra N. Sarkar, Nishit Shah
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(5): 700.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Tao Liu, Jianzhou Zhang, Longlian Deng, Mengzi He, Shuo Tian, Wenyuan Ding, Zheng Wang, Dalong Yang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances
    Sungwon Lee, Joon-Yong Jung, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Jin-Sung Kim
    Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 474.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence: a new cutting-edge tool in spine surgery
    Guna Pratheep Kalanjiyam, Thiyagarajan Chandramohan, Muthu Raman, Haritha Kalyanasundaram
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(3): 458.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning models on a web application to predict short-term postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Mert Karabacak, Abhiraj D. Bhimani, Alexander J. Schupper, Matthew T. Carr, Jeremy Steinberger, Konstantinos Margetis
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Research: A New Frontier
    Min Cheol Chang
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(9): 915.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the performance of the SORG machine learning algorithm for predicting discharge disposition in lumbar surgery patients
    Omar Salim, Mohamed S Draz, Emily R Bligh, Calan Mathieson
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2024; 36(4): 101132.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues
    Emmanuel O. Mensah, Joshua I. Chalif, Jessica G. Baker, Eric Chalif, Jason Biundo, Michael W. Groff
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(18): 5460.     CrossRef
  • Information fusion and artificial intelligence for smart healthcare: a bibliometric study
    Xieling Chen, Haoran Xie, Zongxi Li, Gary Cheng, Mingming Leng, Fu Lee Wang
    Information Processing & Management.2023; 60(1): 103113.     CrossRef
  • Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms to Predict Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Rushmin Khazanchi, Anitesh Bajaj, Rohan M. Shah, Austin R. Chen, Samuel G. Reyes, Steven S. Kurapaty, Wellington K. Hsu, Alpesh A. Patel, Srikanth N. Divi
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • Development and External Validation of a Risk Calculator for Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Akash A. Shah, Sai K. Devana, Changhee Lee, Thomas E. Olson, Alexander Upfill-Brown, William L. Sheppard, Elizabeth L. Lord, Arya N. Shamie, Mihaela van der Schaar, Nelson F. SooHoo, Don Y. Park
    Spine.2023; 48(7): 460.     CrossRef
  • Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roger Compte, Isabelle Granville Smith, Amanda Isaac, Nathan Danckert, Terence McSweeney, Panagiotis Liantis, Frances M. K. Williams
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(11): 3764.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Drivers of Staff Engagement in Healthcare Organizations Using Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms
    Ragheb Al-Nammari, Mecit Can Emre Simsekler, Adriana Felicia Gabor, Abroon Qazi
    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.2023; 70(8): 2988.     CrossRef
  • Rapid Estimation of Contact Stresses in Imageless Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Jun Young Kim, Muhammad Sohail, Heung Soo Kim
    Mathematics.2023; 11(16): 3527.     CrossRef
  • Advances in artificial intelligence, robotics, augmented and virtual reality in neurosurgery
    Kimia Kazemzadeh, Meisam Akhlaghdoust, Alireza Zali
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proposed applications of machine learning to intraoperative neuromonitoring during spine surgeries
    John P. Wilson Jr, Deepak Kumbhare, Sandeep Kandregula, Alexander Oderhowho, Bharat Guthikonda, Stanley Hoang
    Neuroscience Informatics.2023; 3(4): 100143.     CrossRef
  • Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients
    Benjamin S. Hopkins, Michael B. Cloney, Ekamjeet S. Dhillon, Pavlos Texakalidis, Jonathan Dallas, Vincent N. Nguyen, Matthew Ordon, Najib El Tecle, Thomas C. Chen, Patrick C. Hsieh, John C. Liu, Tyler R. Koski, Nader S. Dahdaleh
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2023; 14(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery
    Themistoklis Tragaris, Ioannis S Benetos, John Vlamis, Spyridon Pneumaticos
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Marc Ghanem, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Archis Bhandarkar, Andrea de Giorgio, Adrian Elmi-Terander, Mohamad Bydon
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(12): 1723.     CrossRef
  • Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review
    Mark E. Stephens, Christen M. O’Neal, Alison M. Westrup, Fauziyya Y. Muhammad, Daniel M. McKenzie, Andrew H. Fagg, Zachary A. Smith
    Neurosurgical Review.2022; 45(2): 965.     CrossRef
  • Current Applications of Machine Learning in Spine: From Clinical View
    GuanRui Ren, Kun Yu, ZhiYang Xie, PeiYang Wang, Wei Zhang, Yong Huang, YunTao Wang, XiaoTao Wu
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(8): 1827.     CrossRef
  • The State of Machine Learning in Spine Surgery
    Edward M. DelSole, Wyatt L. Keck, Aalpen A. Patel
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models
    Babak Saravi, Frank Hassel, Sara Ülkümen, Alisia Zink, Veronika Shavlokhova, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Martin Boeker, Peter Obid, Gernot Lang
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 509.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Cesar D. Lopez, Venkat Boddapati, Joseph M. Lombardi, Nathan J. Lee, Justin Mathew, Nicholas C. Danford, Rajiv R. Iyer, Marc D. Dyrszka, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Lawrence G. Lenke, Ronald A. Lehman
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(7): 1561.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility
    Alexander L. Hornung, Christopher M. Hornung, G. Michael Mallow, J. Nicolás Barajas, Augustus Rush, Arash J. Sayari, Fabio Galbusera, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Matthew Colman, Frank M. Phillips, Howard S. An, Dino Samartzis
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(8): 2057.     CrossRef
  • A Computer-Assisted System for Early Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Emergency Room Triage
    Kuan-Chi Tu, Tee-Tau Eric Nyam, Che-Chuan Wang, Nai-Ching Chen, Kuo-Tai Chen, Chia-Jung Chen, Chung-Feng Liu, Jinn-Rung Kuo
    Brain Sciences.2022; 12(5): 612.     CrossRef
  • Could Machine Learning Better Predict Postoperative C5 Palsy of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament?
    Soo Heon Kim, Sun Ho Lee, Dong Ah Shin
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(5): E419.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Risk of Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Electronic Health Record–Based Machine Learning: Development and Validation
    Hao Yang, Jiaxi Li, Siru Liu, Xiaoling Yang, Jialin Liu
    JMIR Medical Informatics.2022; 10(6): e36958.     CrossRef
  • A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion
    Akash A. Shah, Sai K. Devana, Changhee Lee, Amador Bugarin, Michelle K. Hong, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Gideon Blumstein, Elizabeth L. Lord, Arya N. Shamie, Mihaela van der Schaar, Nelson F. SooHoo, Don Y. Park
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 166: e703.     CrossRef
  • Real-time risk prediction of colorectal surgery-related post-surgical complications using GRU-D model
    Xiaoyang Ruan, Sunyang Fu, Curtis B. Storlie, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson, Hongfang Liu
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics.2022; 135: 104202.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Deep Learning and Classical Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Postoperative Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures With State-of-the-art Performance
    Adrian J. Rodrigues, Ethan Schonfeld, Kunal Varshneya, Martin N. Stienen, Victor E. Staartjes, Michael C. Jin, Anand Veeravagu
    Spine.2022; 47(23): 1637.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Admission Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Utilizing Machine Learning
    Anirudh K. Gowd, Avinesh Agarwalla, Edward C. Beck, Peter B. Derman, Siamak Yasmeh, Todd J. Albert, Joseph N. Liu
    Spine.2022; 47(22): 1549.     CrossRef
  • The future of artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: A narrative review
    Javed Iqbal, Kainat Jahangir, Yusra Mashkoor, Nazia Sultana, Dalia Mehmood, Mohammad Ashraf, Ather Iqbal, Muhammad Hassan Hafeez
    Surgical Neurology International.2022; 13: 536.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions
    Yangyang Cui, Jia Zhu, Zhili Duan, Zhenhua Liao, Song Wang, Weiqiang Liu
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(18): 11708.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Short-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Anirudh K. Gowd, Conor N. O’Neill, Ameen Barghi, Tadhg J. O’Gara, Jonathan J. Carmouche
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 168: e223.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Spine Surgery
    Jonathan J. Rasouli, Jianning Shao, Sean Neifert, Wende N. Gibbs, Ghaith Habboub, Michael P. Steinmetz, Edward Benzel, Thomas E. Mroz
    Global Spine Journal.2021; 11(4): 556.     CrossRef
  • TET-dependent GDF7 hypomethylation impairs aqueous humor outflow and serves as a potential therapeutic target in glaucoma
    Peixing Wan, Erping Long, Zhidong Li, Yingting Zhu, Wenru Su, Yehong Zhuo
    Molecular Therapy.2021; 29(4): 1639.     CrossRef
  • Using Predictive Modeling and Machine Learning to Identify Patients Appropriate for Outpatient Anterior Cervical Fusion and Discectomy
    Kevin Y. Wang, Krishna V. Suresh, Varun Puvanesarajah, Micheal Raad, Adam Margalit, Amit Jain
    Spine.2021; 46(10): 665.     CrossRef
  • Neurosurgery and artificial intelligence
    Mohammad Mofatteh
    AIMS Neuroscience.2021; 8(4): 477.     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic and prognostic value of artificial intelligence and artificial neural networks in spinal surgery
    Jake M. McDonnell, Shane Richard Evans, Laura McCarthy, Hugo Temperley, Caitlin Waters, Daniel Ahern, Gráinne Cunniffe, Seamus Morris, Keith Synnott, Nick Birch, Joseph S. Butler
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2021; 103-B(9): 1442.     CrossRef
  • A Primer on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery
    Yoshihiro Katsuura, Luis F. Colón, Alberto A. Perez, Todd J. Albert, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(9): 316.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Machine Learning in Pediatric Hydrocephalus
    Bhavya Pahwa, Ojasvini Bali, Sarvesh Goyal, Shweta Kedia
    Neurology India.2021; 69(Suppl 2): S380.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Yoon Ha, Jun Jae Shin
    Neurosurgical Review.2020; 43(5): 1409.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Quality and Safety
    Michelle S. Lee, Matthew M. Grabowski, Ghaith Habboub, Thomas E. Mroz
    Global Spine Journal.2020; 10(1_suppl): 99S.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation
    Hyung Cheol Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Du Su Kim, Jeffrey S. Roh, Tae Woo Kim, Seong Bae An, Hyeong Seok Jeon, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha
    Neurosurgical Review.2020; 43(5): 1423.     CrossRef
  • The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review
    Angelos Mantelakis, Ankur Khajuria
    Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Upper Cervical Surgery, Increased Signal Intensity of the Spinal Cord, and Hypertension as Risk Factors for Dyspnea After Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Seong Bae An, Jong Joo Lee, Tae Woo Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha
    Spine.2020; 45(7): E379.     CrossRef
  • Harnessing Big Data in Neurocritical Care in the Era of Precision Medicine
    Ayham Alkhachroum, Kalijah Terilli, Murad Megjhani, Soojin Park
    Current Treatment Options in Neurology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression in the Evaluation of Risk for Dry Eye after Vitrectomy
    Wan-Ju Yang, Li Wu, Zhong-Ming Mei, Yi Xiang
    Journal of Ophthalmology.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Effect of Diabetes on Reoperation After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Sample Cohort Study
    Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Yunhee Choi, Min-Jung Kim, Dahae Yim, Seung Heon Yang, Dong Hwan Kim, Young San Ko, Sung Bae Park
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 139: e439.     CrossRef
  • Autonomous image segmentation and identification of anatomical landmarks from lumbar spine intraoperative computed tomography scans using machine learning: A validation study
    Krzyzstof Siemionow, Cristian Luciano, Craig Forsthoefel, Suavi Aydogmus
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2020; 11(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases
    Parisa Azimi, Taravat Yazdanian, Edward C. Benzel, Hossein Nayeb Aghaei, Shirzad Azhari, Sohrab Sadeghi, Ali Montazeri
    Asian Spine Journal.2020; 14(4): 543.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence manages congenital cataract with individualized prediction and telehealth computing
    Erping Long, Jingjing Chen, Xiaohang Wu, Zhenzhen Liu, Liming Wang, Jiewei Jiang, Wangting Li, Yi Zhu, Chuan Chen, Zhuoling Lin, Jing Li, Xiaoyan Li, Hui Chen, Chong Guo, Lanqin Zhao, Daoyao Nie, Xinhua Liu, Xin Liu, Zhe Dong, Bo Yun, Wenbin Wei, Fan Xu,
    npj Digital Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Complications of Sine Surgery in Elderly Japanese Patients: Implications for Future of World Population Aging
    Motoyuki Umekawa, Keisuke Takai, Makoto Taniguchi
    Neurospine.2019; 16(4): 780.     CrossRef
  • Hack your Neurospine !
    Yoon Ha
    Neurospine.2018; 15(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • 13,302 View
  • 279 Download
  • 77 Web of Science
  • 73 Crossref

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Option of Motion Preservation in Cervical Spondylosis: Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Update
Neurospine. 2018;15(4):296-305.   Published online December 14, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Option of Motion Preservation in Cervical Spondylosis: Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Update
Neurospine. 2018;15(4):296-305.   Published online December 14, 2018
Close
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), or total disc replacement, has emerged as an option in the past two decades for the management of 1- and 2-level cervical disc herniation and spondylosis causing radiculopathy, myelopathy, or both. Multiple prospective randomized controlled trials have demonstrated CDA to be as safe and effective as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, which has been the standard of care for decades. Moreover, CDA successfully preserved segmental mobility in the majority of surgical levels for 5–10 years. Although CDA has been suggested to have long-term efficacy for the reduction of adjacent segment disease in some studies, more data are needed on this topic. Surgery for CDA is more demanding for decompression, because indirect decompression by placement of a tall bone graft is not possible in CDA. The artificial discs should be properly sized, centered, and installed to allow movement of the vertebrae, and are commonly 6 mm high or less in most patients. The key to successful CDA surgery includes strict patient selection, generous decompression of the neural elements, accurate sizing of the device, and appropriately centered implant placement.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • The Total Disc Replacement Osteolysis Grading Scale – a simple, reliable and quantifiable tool for assessing, managing and reporting osteolysis after cervical total disc replacement
    Alana Celenza, Jessica Gaff, Moreica Pabbruwe, Juan Amaya, Ashik Amlani, Andrew Berg, Sonja Häckel, Michael Kern, Andrew Miles, Paul Taylor, Gregory Cunningham
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 1706.     CrossRef
  • A review of combined anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc replacement for multilevel cervical disc disease
    Jeffrey Weinreb, Claire van Ekdom, Diarra Oden, Joseph O’Brien
    Current Orthopaedic Practice.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Skip-Level Cervical Disk Arthroplasty
    Chao-Hung Kuo, Ching‐Ying Wang, Yin-Sheng Chen, Yi-Hsuan Kuo, Chih-Chang Chang, Chin-Lan Wu, Li-Yu Fay, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu
    Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • History of Trauma Preceding Cervical Disc Replacement Leads to Worse Postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Analysis
    Sereen Halayqeh, Chad Z. Simon, Annika Bay, Eric Mai, Cole T. Kwas, Tomoyuki Asada, Andrea Pezzi, Adrian T. H. Lui, Atahan Durbas, Olivia C. Tuma, Nicholas J. Giattino, Anthony R. Lewis, James E. Dowdell, Kyle W. Morse, James Farmer, Russel C. Huang, Todd
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Two-Level ACDF in Treating Consecutive Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yihan Yang, Weishi Liang, Duan Sun, Bo Han, Zhangfu Li, Yeqiu Xu, Peng Yin, Xianjun Qu, Yong Hai
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(8): 3953.     CrossRef
  • Menor síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reoperación. Resultados a mediano y largo plazo de la artroplastia cervical frente a la artrodesis cervical anterior: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados
    J.H. Núñez, B. Escudero, J.D. Montenegro, M.J. Jiménez-Jiménez, J. Martínez-Peña, M. Surroca, D. Bosch-García
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2024; 68(2): 168.     CrossRef
  • [Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    J.H. Núñez, B. Escudero, J.D. Montenegro, M.J. Jiménez-Jiménez, J. Martínez-Peña, M. Surroca, D. Bosch-García
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2024; 68(2): T168.     CrossRef
  • Revolutionizing Relief: Cervical Radiculopathy With Neurological Deficits Rescued by Cervical Disc Replacement
    Rahul Singh, Sohael Khan, Ratnakar E Ambade, Kashyap Kanani, Vipul Agrawal, Siddharth K Patel
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical management of bone loss in cervical total disc arthroplasty: literature review and treatment recommendations
    Hannah Spece, Armen Khachatryan, Frank M. Phillips, Todd H. Lanman, Gunnar B. J. Andersson, Grant E. Garrigues, Hyun Bae, Joshua J. Jacobs, Steven M. Kurtz
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(8): 2969.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of Second-Generation Cervical Spine Arthroplasty: A 5-Year Perspective
    David Bosch-García, Rodrigo Luna Gutiérrez, Berta Escudero Cisneros, Carlos García Cardona, Juan Diego Montenegro, Jorge H. Núñez
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2024; 9(Suppl 2): S117.     CrossRef
  • A Decreasing National Trend in Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty
    Emily S. Mills, Tara Shelby, Gabriel J. Bouz, Raymond J. Hah, Jeffrey C. Wang, Ram K. Alluri
    Global Spine Journal.2023; 13(8): 2271.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Risk Factor of Implant Dislocation After Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 756 Patients
    Chin-Chu Ko, Bo-Kai Feng, Yi-Hsuan Kuo, Chao-Hung Kuo, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Chih-Chang Chang, Henrich Cheng, Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu
    Neurosurgery.2023; 93(2): 330.     CrossRef
  • Multilevel Cervical Disk Arthroplasty
    Aditya Muralidharan, Davin Gong, Joshua D. Piche, Neil Al-Saidi, Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, Ilyas Aleem
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(9): 363.     CrossRef
  • Range of motion after 1, 2, and 3 level cervical disc arthroplasty
    Todd H. Lanman, Jason M. Cuellar, Nicole Mottole, Michael Wernke, Elizabeth Carruthers, Antonio Valdevit
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2023; 16: 100294.     CrossRef
  • Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes
    Ian J. Wellington, Cameron Kia, Ergin Coskun, Barrett B. Torre, Christopher L. Antonacci, Michael R. Mancini, John P. Connors, Sean M. Esmende, Heeren S. Makanji
    Bioengineering.2022; 9(5): 227.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of cervical disc replacement in patients with neck pain greater than arm pain
    Pratyush Shahi, Avani S. Vaishnav, Ryan Lee, Eric Mai, Michael E. Steinhaus, Russel Huang, Todd Albert, Sravisht Iyer, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(9): 1481.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year
    Jorge H. Núñez, Berta Escudero, Irene Omiste, Judith Martínez-Peñas, Maria Surroca, Francisco Alonzo-González, David Bosch-García
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2022; 33(5): 1875.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor Regarding “Anterior Bone Loss in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Correlates with Increased Cervical Lordosis”
    Ioannis Siasios, Kalliopi Tsoleka, Ethymia Samara, Theodosis Birbilis
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 166: 288.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Validity of Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-level Cervical Disc Disease: Initial Two-year Follow-up of the Prospective Observational Post-marketing Surveillance Study for Japanese Patients
    Toshihiro TAKAMI, Takeshi HARA, Masahito HARA, Toshihiko INUI, Kiyoshi ITO, Izumi KOYANAGI, Junichi MIZUNO, Masaki MIZUNO, Hiroyuki NAKASE, Nobuyuki SHIMOKAWA, Taku SUGAWARA, Shinsuke SUZUKI, Toshiyuki TAKAHASHI, Masakazu TAKAYASU, Satoshi TANI, Kazutoshi
    Neurologia medico-chirurgica.2022; 62(11): 489.     CrossRef
  • Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
    Lu Wang, Meng Bai, Xing-Bin Li, Zhao-Rui Wang, Bang Wang, Ai-Bing Huang
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty: a review of optimal surgical management and future directions
    Tsung-Hsi Tu, Ching-Ying Wang, Yu-Chun Chen, Jau-Ching Wu
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Cervical disc arthroplasty for Klippel-Feil syndrome
    Chu-Yi Lee, Ching-Lan Wu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Jau-Ching Wu, Wen-Cheng Huang, Henrich Cheng, Tsung-Hsi Tu
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2021; 209: 106934.     CrossRef
  • Cervical disc arthroplasty: What we know in 2020 and a literature review
    Jun Jae Shin, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Dong Wuk Son, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung-Nyun Kim, Do-Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha, K Daniel Riew
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Late complication of cervical disc arthroplasty: heterotopic ossification causing myelopathy after 10 years. Illustrative case
    Che-Han Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Kuo, Chao-Hung Kuo, Chin-Chu Ko, Jau-Ching Wu, Wen-Cheng Huang
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cervical disc arthroplasty at C2–3: illustrative case
    Jason Ku, Johnson Ku, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Jau-Ching Wu
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cervical Disc Replacement
    Jeremy Steinberger, Sheeraz Qureshi
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2020; 31(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yijian Zhang, Nanning Lv, Fan He, Bin Pi, Hao Liu, Angela Carley Chen, Huilin Yang, Mingming Liu, Xuesong Zhu
    BMC Neurology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor. Indolent clinical and radiological effects of cervical disc arthroplasty
    Wen-Cheng Huang, Yu-Chun Chen, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Chao-Hung Kuo
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(6): 984.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Atul Goel
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(4): 631.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor. The need for research prioritization in cervical myelopathy
    Oliver Daniel Mowforth, Michelle Louise Starkey, Mark Reinhard Kotter, Benjamin Marshall Davies
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(5): 777.     CrossRef
  • Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage
    Bum-Joon Kim, Se-Hoon Kim, Seung-Hwan Lee, Sung-Kon Ha, Sang-Dae Kim, Dong-Jun Lim
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 126: e1228.     CrossRef
  • Cervical disc arthroplasty for less-mobile discs
    Tsung-Hsi Tu, Chu-Yi Lee, Chao-Hung Kuo, Jau-Ching Wu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Li-Yu Fay, Wen-Cheng Huang, Henrich Cheng
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2019; 31(3): 310.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bibliometric analysis and surgical perspectives
    Yu-Chun Chen, Chao-Hung Kuo, Chieh-Ming Cheng, Jau-Ching Wu
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2019; 31(3): 299.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement : Current Status and Future Perspective in Japan
    Toshihiro Takami, Kentaro Naito, Kenji Ohata
    Spinal Surgery.2019; 33(2): 144.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Myelopathy on Early Clinical Improvement After Cervical Disc Replacement: A Study of a Local Patient Cohort and a Large National Cohort
    Andre M. Samuel, Harold G. Moore, Avani S. Vaishnav, Steven McAnany, Todd Albert, Sravisht Iyer, Yoshihiro Katsuura, Catherine Himo Gang, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    Neurospine.2019; 16(3): 563.     CrossRef
  • Preservation Versus Elimination of Segmental Motion in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
    Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu
    Neurospine.2019; 16(3): 576.     CrossRef
  • 16,580 View
  • 261 Download
  • 35 Web of Science
  • 36 Crossref

Invited Review

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Diagnosing Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2018;15(3):194-205.   Published online September 28, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Diagnosing Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Neurospine. 2018;15(3):194-205.   Published online September 28, 2018
Close
Radiographic confirmation of fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is a critical aspect of determining surgical success. However, there is a lack of established diagnostic radiographic parameters for pseudoarthrosis. The purpose of this study is to summarize the findings of previous studies, review the advantages and disadvantages of frequently employed diagnostic criteria, and present our recommended protocol of fusion assessment. This study identified randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies reporting on spinal fusion and how successful fusion after ACDF. Among the 39 articles reviewed, bridging bone across the operated levels on static radiographs was the most commonly used criteria to confirm fusion (31 of 39, 79%). Dynamic flexion-extension radiographs were used to assess for interspinous movement (ISM) (22 of 39, 56.4%) and change in Cobb angle (12 of 39, 30.8%). Computed tomography (CT) based findings (21 of 39, 53.8%) were employed in ambiguous cases with improved sensitivity and specificity. Reconstructed CT scans were used to assess for intragraft bridging bone and extragraft bridging bone (ExGBB). ExGBB were proved to have the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for pseudoarthrosis detection when compared to all other radiographic criteria. The ISM <1 mm on dynamic flexion-extension radiographs had high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well. After our reviewing, we recommend using dynamic lateral flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs at 150% magnificationin which the interspinous motion <1 mm and superjacent interspinous motion ≥4 mm confirms fusion. In ambiguous cases, we recommend using reconstructed CT scans to evaluate for ExGBB.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Patients Show Similar Recovery Metrics Measured by Health-related Quality-of-life Scores Despite Differences in CT-graphic Fusion Status One Year After 1-level and 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Annika Bay, Tomoyuki Asada, Kevin J. DiSilvestro, William Doran, Joshua Zhang, Nishtha Singh, Atahan Durbas, John E. Lama, Ted Shi, Olivia C. Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Eric R. Zhao, Adin M. Ehrlich, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(1): E1.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion utilizing zero-profile self-locking cages versus the cage-with-plate system: a 5-year-minimum follow-up study
    Haoyu He, Zhiwei Yang, Lini Dong, Ou Zhang, Yunlong Liao, Changyu Pan, Lei Kuang
    Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Establishment of an animal model of shaft femoral pseudoarthrosis in rabbits
    Achraf Lajmi, Najah Elmounedi, Manel Mellouli, Raja Amri, Nizar Sahnoun, Melek Turki, Sami Sellami, Zoubaier Ellouz, Hassib Keskes
    Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger.2026; 264: 152766.     CrossRef
  • Mid-Thoracic Upper Instrumented Vertebrae in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Anthony E. Bishay, Harsh Jain, Hani Chanbour, Tyler Metcalf, Alexander T. Lyons, Iyan Younus, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Spine.2026; 51(1): E1.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Bony Fusion With an Integrated Cage/Screw Device for Anterior Cervical Fusion With Computed Tomography
    Ryan Snowden, Cara Ford, Barrett Boody, Joseph Smucker, Daniel Leas, Rick Sasso
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Utility of Routine Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries
    Hershil Patel, Sapan Patel, Rohan I. Suresh, Vishal A. Khatri, Keerthana Srinivasan, Husni Alasadi, Evan Honig, Ryan Curto, Usman Zareef, Robin Fencel, Alexander Padovano, Louis J. Bivona, Daniel L. Cavanaugh, Eugene Y. Koh, Steven C. Ludwig, Julio J. Jau
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(6): 2231.     CrossRef
  • Longer Screws Decrease the Risk of Radiographic Pseudarthrosis Following Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Hani Chanbour, Gabriel A. Bendfeldt, Graham W. Johnson, Keyan Peterson, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Iyan Younus, Michael Longo, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 858.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of fusion rate, radiologic and clinical outcome between CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass-ceramics 7 (BGS-7) spacer and allograft spacer with iliac bone graft in multilevel ACDF
    Sung Taek Chung, MinJoon Cho, Tae Hoon Kang, In-Wook Seo, Jae Hyup Lee
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(1): 128.     CrossRef
  • 18F-Naf PET/CT in pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Yacine El Yaagoubi, Eric Lioret, Clément Thomas, Jean-Edouard Loret, Adrien Simonneau, Aymeric Amelot, Anne-Victoire Michaud-Robert, Henri Pasquesoone, Laurent Philippe, Caroline Prunier-Aesch
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(4): 763.     CrossRef
  • How Reliable is the Assessment of Fusion Status Following ACDF Using Dynamic Flexion-Extension Radiographs?
    Christopher T. Martin, Sangwook Tim Yoon, Ram Kiran Alluri, Edward C. Benzel, Chris M. Bono, Samuel K. Cho, Dean Chou, Xiaolong Chen, Jason P.Y. Cheung, Juan P. Cabrera, Stipe Ćorluka, Andreas K. Demetriades, Matthew F. Gary, Zoher Ghogawala, Waeel Hamoud
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(4): 2450.     CrossRef
  • Does two-level hybrid surgery promote early fusion compared with two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Jing Li, Yonggui Wu, Hao Liu, Can Guo, Junqi Zhang, Kangkang Huang, Tingkui Wu, Ying Hong, Yang Meng, Chen Ding, Beiyu Wang, Xin Rong
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(6): 1167.     CrossRef
  • Interspinous Motion Measurement Could Serve as a Quantitative Method for Assessing Bony Fusion After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion
    Haoxiang Wang, Tian Xia, Ruomu Qu, Yu Sun, Fengshan Zhang, Shengfa Pan, Xin Chen, Yanbin Zhao, Liang Jiang, Feifei Zhou
    Spine.2025; 50(3): E39.     CrossRef
  • Zero-Profile Stand-Alone Cages Versus Traditional Cage-and-Plate Constructs in Single and Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Using Validated Fusion Assessment Methods
    Eric R. Zhao, Robert Kamil, Austin C. Kaidi, Jung K. Mok, Yousi Oquendo, Olatunde Badejo, Troy B. Amen, Gregory S. Kazarian, Tomoyuki Asada, Arsen M. Omurzakov, Tim Xu, Tejas Subramanian, Nathan H. Varady, Mitchell A. Johnson, Bo Zhang, Mitchell S. Fourma
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(8): 3679.     CrossRef
  • Fusion Sequence and Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Hyun Woong Mun, Jong Joo Lee, Hyun Chul Shin, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Woo Kim, Jae Keun Oh
    Neurosurgery.2025; 97(5): 1153.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Pseudarthrosis Diagnosis: Dynamic Radiographs After Cervical Fusion with Stand-Alone Intervertebral Cage
    Franz Jooji Onishi
    Journal of Surgery Research and Practice.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Postoperative Ketorolac Administration and Pseudoarthrosis Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Anthony N. Baumann, Robert J. Trager, Omkar S. Anaspure, Tyler Metcalf, Ethan J. Cottrill, Cassandra Hoffmann, Jacob C. Hoffmann
    Spine.2025; 50(17): 1180.     CrossRef
  • Heterogeneity in radiographic fusion criteria for ACDF in FDA IDE trials: A systematic review
    Elyette Lugo, Kiehyun Daniel Riew, Sang Hun Lee, Gabriel Nazario-Ferrer, Eleanor Farris, Christopher Martin, Samuel K. Cho, Sangwook Tim Yoon, Amit Jain
    Spine Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early postoperative factors associated with pseudoarthrosis at 24 months following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Hangeul Park, Yunhee Choi, Woojin Kim, Jungbo Sim, Ho Sung Myeong, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim
    Medicine.2025; 104(46): e45974.     CrossRef
  • Association between fusion and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy at 1-, 2- and 5-year follow-up
    Floor E. de Vries, Ignacio Mesina-Estarrón, Carmen L. A. Vleggeert-Lankamp, Abdelrahman Hamouda
    PLOS One.2025; 20(12): e0337909.     CrossRef
  • Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer vs Anterior Plate Construct in the Management of Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Osama Aldahamsheh, Abduljabbar Alhammoud, Sereen Halayqeh, W. Bradley Jacobs, Kenneth C. Thomas, Fred Nicholls, Nathan Evaniew
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(3): 1038.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Spine Metastasis After Different Surgical Approaches: A Single-Center Experience
    Hani Chanbour, Gabriel A. Bendfeldt, Jeffrey W. Chen, Lakshmi Suryateja Gangavarapu, Iyan Younus, Steven G. Roth, Silky Chotai, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 181: e789.     CrossRef
  • The incidence of reoperation for pseudarthrosis after cervical spine surgery
    Jacob Jo, Nikita Lakomkin, Scott L. Zuckerman, Hani Chanbour, K. Daniel Riew
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(3): 1275.     CrossRef
  • Dosing Strategy for Osteobiologics Used in ACDF Surgery: Influence on Fusion Rates and Associated Complications. A Systematic Literature Review
    Waeel O. Hamouda, Sotiris Veranis, Oscar Krol, Navraj S. Sagoo, Peter G. Passias, Zorica Buser, Hans Jörg Meisel, Tim Yoon
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(2_suppl): 129.     CrossRef
  • Porous Cage Macro-Topography Improves Early Fusion Rates in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Gregory M. Malham, Dean T. Biddau, Jordan P. Laggoune, Charlie R. Faulks, William R. Walsh, Yi Yuen Wang, Imtiaz Wani
    Surgery Research and Practice.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Osteoporosis on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Chul Gie Hong, Woo Dong Nam, Young Ju Lee, Dong-Ho Lee
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(2): 182.     CrossRef
  • An Algorithmic Roadmap for the Surgical Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Narrative Review
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Kiehyun Daniel Riew
    Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(2): 274.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis of spine pseudoarthrosis based on the biomechanical properties of bone
    John A. Hipp, Mark M. Mikhael, Charles A. Reitman, Zorica Buser, Vikas V. Patel, Christopher D. Chaput, Gary Ghiselli, John DeVine, Sigurd Berven, Pierce Nunley, Trevor F. Grieco
    The Spine Journal.2024; 24(12): 2407.     CrossRef
  • Assessing accuracy of measurement methods for bony fusion assessment after anterior cervical discectomy
    Floor E. de Vries, Ignacio Mesina-Estarrón, Jakob V.E. Gerstl, Rania A. Mekary, Carmen L.A. Vleggeert-Lankamp
    The Spine Journal.2024; 24(11): 2035.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Impact of congenital spinal stenosis on the outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study
    Yibo Liu, Zheng Zeng, Shuanghe Liu
    International Orthopaedics.2024; 48(11): 2953.     CrossRef
  • Pseudoarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: rate of occult infections and outcome of anterior revision surgery
    Anna-Katharina Calek, Elin Winkler, Mazda Farshad, José Miguel Spirig
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of surface roughness and bulk porosity on spinal interbody implants
    Hannah A. Levy, Brian A. Karamian, Goutham R. Yalla, Jose A. Canseco, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Christopher K. Kepler
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.2023; 111(2): 478.     CrossRef
  • Anterior bone loss: A common phenomenon which should be considered as bone remodeling process existed not only in patients underwent cervical disk replacement but also those with anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion
    Yifei Deng, Beiyu Wang, Ying Hong, Yi Yang, Rong Xing, Xiaofei Wang, Hao Liu
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(3): 977.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the K-line in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Analysis of sagittal cervical curvature changes and surgical outcomes
    Zhongxin Tang, Tailong Chen, Jun Tan, Huafeng Zhang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Outcomes at Minimum Five years Follow-up
    Dong-Ho Lee, Sehan Park, Choon Sung Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Sung Tan Cho
    Spine.2023; 48(9): 600.     CrossRef
  • Fate of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a minimum 5-year follow-up
    Dong-Ho Lee, Sehan Park, Sang Yun Seok, Jae Hwan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang, In Hee Kim, Seung Hyun Baek
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(12): 1790.     CrossRef
  • Interbody Cage Placement Without Plate Supplementation Adjacent to Plated Segments in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
    Seiichi Odate, Jitsuhiko Shikata
    Spine.2023; 48(17): 1245.     CrossRef
  • Pseudarthrosis of the Cervical Spine
    Scott L. Zuckerman, Clinton J. Devin
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(3): 97.     CrossRef
  • What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Mark J. Lambrechts, Nicholas D. D'Antonio, Brian A. Karamian, Gregory R. Toci, Matthew Sherman, Jose A. Canseco, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Alan S. Hilibrand, Gregory D. Schroeder
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(10): 1610.     CrossRef
  • Successful fusion versus pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation: a comprehensive imaging review
    John C. Benson, Vance T. Lehman, Arjun S. Sebastian, Noelle A. Larson, Ahmad Nassr, Felix E. Diehn, John T. Wald, Naveen S. Murthy
    Neuroradiology.2022; 64(9): 1719.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Fusion Rates Between Fresh-Frozen and Freeze-Dried Allografts in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Derron Yu, Paramjyot Singh Panesar, Connor Delman, Benjamin W. Van, Machelle D. Wilson, Hai Van Le, Rolando Roberto, Yashar Javidan, Eric O. Klineberg
    World Neurosurgery: X.2022; 16: 100126.     CrossRef
  • Transforaminal Fusion Using Physiologically Integrated Titanium Cages with a Novel Design in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Disorders: A Pilot Study
    Renat Nurmukhametov, Medet Dosanov, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion, Rossi Barrientos, Yasser Matos, Alexander Ivanovich Alyokhin, Ismael Peralta Baez, Ibrahim Efecan Efe, Manuela Restrepo, Vishal Chavda, Bipin Chaurasia, Nicola Montemurro
    Surgeries.2022; 3(3): 175.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Postoperative Pseudarthrosis in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) on Dynamic Radiographs Using Novel Angular Measurements
    Eaman Balouch, Aonnicha Burapachaisri, Dainn Woo, Zoe Norris, Anand Segar, Ethan W. Ayres, Dennis Vasquez-Montes, Aaron J. Buckland, Afshin Razi, Michael L. Smith, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis, Yong H. Kim
    Spine.2022; 47(16): 1151.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Fusion versus Nonunion After 4-Level and 5-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion With Anterior Plate Fixation
    Adewale A. Bakare, Adam D. Smitherman, Ricardo B. V. Fontes, John E. O'Toole, Harel Deutsch, Vincent C. Traynelis
    Neurosurgery.2022; 91(5): 764.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm
    Sehan Park, Jeoung Kun Kim, Min Cheol Chang, Jeong Jin Park, Jae Jun Yang, Gun Woo Lee
    Spine.2022; 47(23): 1645.     CrossRef
  • Endplate-specific fusion rate 1 year after surgery for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF)
    Hyun Jun Jang, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Dong Kyu Chin
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2022; 164(12): 3173.     CrossRef
  • Imaging Evaluation of the Spinal Hardware: What Residents and Fellows Need to Know
    Licia P. Luna, Sumeet G. Dua, Mehmet Kocak, Karl-Olof Lovblad, Ricardo Fontes, Melike Guryildirim
    Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology.2021; 50(5): 675.     CrossRef
  • Fate of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Following Anterior Cervical Fusion: Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy or Laminoplasty
    Dong-Ho Lee, Woo Dong Nam, Nam Yeop Kim, Jin Woo Park, Chul Gie Hong
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 146: e1270.     CrossRef
  • Comparison Between Three- and Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes
    Jose A. Canseco, Paul D. Minetos, Brian A. Karamian, Taylor M. Paziuk, Bryce A. Basques, Stephen L. DiMaria, Tyler Timmins, Haydn Hallman, Tyler Henry, Joseph K. Lee, Mark F. Kurd, D. Greg Anderson, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Keple
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 151: e507.     CrossRef
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Applications in Spine Disorders: A Comprehensive Review
    Alice Baroncini, Jörg Eschweiler, Philipp Kobbe, Valentin Quack, Samir Smajic, Per Trobisch, Frank Hildebrand, Filippo Migliorini
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(17): 7966.     CrossRef
  • Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Older Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Young-Old Patients (Ages 65–74 Years) and Middle-Old Patients (Over 75 Years)
    Chi Hyung Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Su Hun Lee, Jun Seok Lee, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song
    Neurospine.2020; 17(1): 156.     CrossRef
  • Effect of K-line on posterior cervical surgery in patients with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification
    Cheng Li, Hong Zhou, Sen Yang, Xuanchen Zhu, Guochun Zha, Zhi Yang, Feng Yuan, Weimin Jiang
    European Spine Journal.2020; 29(9): 2368.     CrossRef
  • Response to Dr. Hao Liu's Letter RE
    Charles H. Crawford, Leah Yacat Carreon
    Spine.2020; 45(15): E975.     CrossRef
  • Does screw length for primary two-level ACDF influence pseudarthrosis risk?
    Nathan J. Lee, Meghana Vulapalli, Paul Park, Jun S. Kim, Venkat Boddapati, Justin Mathew, Louis F. Amorosa, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Ronald A. Lehman, K. Daniel Riew
    The Spine Journal.2020; 20(11): 1752.     CrossRef
  • Spine Fixation Hardware: An Update
    Jonelle Petscavage-Thomas, Tao Ouyang, Jesse Bible
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2020; 215(3): 534.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Tolerability of Stromal Vascular Fraction Combined with β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Phase I Clinical Trial
    Kyoung-Tae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Un Yong Choi, Sang Heon Lim, Young Jae Kim, Seil Sohn, Seung Hun Sheen, Chan Yeong Heo, Inbo Han
    Cells.2020; 9(10): 2250.     CrossRef
  • Characterizing the fusion order and level-specific rates of arthrodesis in 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A radiographic study
    Noah M. Nichols, Alysha Jamieson, Minghao Wang, Dean Chou, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Lee A. Tan
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2020; 81: 328.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of short-term and long-term surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament between anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior laminoplasty
    Bong Ju Moon, Doyoung Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha
    Neurosurgical Review.2019; 42(4): 907.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor. PEEK interbody device and pseudarthrosis
    Hardik Sardana, Roshan Sahu, Shweta Kedia
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2019; 31(4): 617.     CrossRef
  • 20,681 View
  • 421 Download
  • 56 Web of Science
  • 58 Crossref