Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Cervical foraminotomy"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Cervical foraminotomy"

Original Articles

Special Issue With Global Spine Journal

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):807-819.   Published online September 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):807-819.   Published online September 30, 2024
Close
Objective
The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF).
Methods
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF.
Results
Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p<0.05). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p>0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813).
Conclusion
We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Biportal Endoscopic Revision Diskectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Using O-Arm Navigation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
    Sang Hyub Lee, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park
    Operative Neurosurgery.2026; 30(3): 481.     CrossRef
  • A large-scale database comparison of contemporary surgical complications in cervical radiculopathy: Cervical disc replacement versus posterior cervical foraminotomy
    Nicholas J. Cormas, Ariaz Goudarzi, Ved Vengsarkar, J. Allen Chi, Joyce Wang, Li Jin, Stephen Lockey, Xudong Joshua Li
    Journal of Orthopaedics.2026; 72: 262.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions of Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review With Narrative Insights
    Ryan Wang, Satheeshram Tamilselvan, Ji Soo Ha, Aditya Vedantam, Courtney Rory Goodwin, Nathan Evaniew, Uzondu F. Agochukwu, Konstantinos Margetis, Yoon Ha, Michael Fehlings, Jefferson R. Wilson, Ankit I. Mehta
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for cervicothoracic junction disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Huaibin Wang, Hui Li, Rushuo Wei, Hao Yan, Ruzhan Yao, Weiqiang Liu, Ling Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • No surgical site infections observed after lumbar unilateral biportal endoscopy: a multicenter retrospective series of 1566 patients
    Aurore Sellier, Joseph Cristini, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Francois Lechanoine, Nicolas Pellet, Jonathan Lebhar, Guillaume Lonjon
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105949.     CrossRef
  • Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages Compared With Open TLIF: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates
    Sang Hyub Lee, Junghan Seo, Dain Jeong, Sang Youp Han, Dong Hyun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S28.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Biportal Endoscopic Resection of a Cervical Laminar Osteoid Osteoma Adjacent to the Facet Joint: A Case Report
    Kwan-Su Song, Joon Young Jung
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S102.     CrossRef
  • Nerve Root Herniation Due to Delayed Dural Tear Following Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression With Lumbar Discectomy Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy
    Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(Suppl 1): S109.     CrossRef
  • Complications and their prevention in unilateral biportal endoscopy: a systematic review with narrative insights and practical management algorithms
    Xavier A. Santander, Martin N. Stienen, Stefan Motov, Héctor U. Quintanilla, Elsa González Pérez
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unilateral biportal endoscopic partial cervical laminectomy and facetectomy: An ex vivo study and case report
    Hojung Bae, Haebeom Lee, Sanghyun Nam, Youngjin Jeon, Jaemin Jeong
    Veterinary Surgery.2026; 55(3): 657.     CrossRef
  • Complications in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery–Tubular, Uniportal, and Biportal Endoscopic Surgery (2013–2024)
    Noah Willett, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl
    Spine.2026; 51(7): E175.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Risk Factors for 30- and 90-day Reoperations Following Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations
    Sang Hyub Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Hangyu Lee, Limjoon Yoon, Sejin Song, Dain Jeong, Junghan Seo, Sang Youp Han, Bang-Sang Hahn, Jun Young Kim, Jin Seop Hwang, Dong-Geun Lee, Jin-Sung Kim, Dong Chan Lee, Yong Eun Cho, Choon Keun Park
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Abdullah Afridi, Ayesha Zulfiqar, Muhammad Waqar Shahid, Fatima Sajjad, Hamnah Sohail, Fazia Khattak, Sabir Khan, Ayesha Naseem, Alina Batool, Muhammad Muneeb, Savira Khattak, Izhar Ul Haq, Ayesha Shahid, Ayesha Nauman, Marium Nisar, Tanveer Hussain, Ahsa
    Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression
    Ryan Wang, Mohammed Rasheed, William Zeng, Alexander T. Hong, Hannah Cho, Syed I. Khalid, Ankit I. Mehta
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Posterior Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Diskectomy: Surgical Techniques and Review of Outcomes
    Sang Hun Lee, Wesley M. Durand, Micheal Raad, Amit Jain
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2025; 33(18): e1072.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a cost-effective three-dimensional-printed cervical spine model for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy training: a prospective educational study from Turkey
    Bilal Bahadır Akbulut, Elif Ezgi Çenberlitaş, Mustafa Serdar Bölük, Taşkın Yurtseven, Hüseyin Biçeroğlu
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • Fluid and thermal dynamics in endoscopic spine surgery: What surgeons need to know
    Dong Hun Kim, Sang Don Kim, Jin Young Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Jung Woo Hur
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111287.     CrossRef
  • Biportal Endoscopic Techniques for Severe Dural Ossification in Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: Insights From Preoperative Imaging
    Ji Yeon Kim, Su Yong Choi, Dong Chan Lee, Hyeun Sung Kim, Dong Hwa Heo
    Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 819.     CrossRef
  • Single-Incision Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for 2-Level Cervical Radiculopathy
    Florian Wanivenhaus, Christoph Johannes Laux, Sohrab Gollogly, Jin-Sung Kim, Mazda Farshad
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(2): 289.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes between ipsilateral and contralateral inclinatory approaches in unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy
    JinWoo Jung, Sang-Woo Lee, Donghyun Kim, Young San Ko, Dae-Chul Cho, Sang-Kyu Son, Man-Kyu Park
    European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C7–T1 Full-Endoscopic Posterior Foraminotomy and Sequestrectomy Using Navigation
    Soubach Saravanan, Jean Yves Fournier, Alexandre Simonin
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1168.     CrossRef
  • 11,645 View
  • 308 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Anatomical Importance Between Neural Structure and Bony Landmark: Clinical Importance for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):139-146.   Published online March 31, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Anatomical Importance Between Neural Structure and Bony Landmark: Clinical Importance for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):139-146.   Published online March 31, 2021
Close
Objective
Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) is a well-established, minimally invasive surgery for cervical radiculopathy, but have the more chances of neural structure damage due to the limited visibility and steeper learning curve. So, the anatomical understanding of the nerve associated with the bony structure will be an essential surgical guideline.
Methods
We measured the distance between the bilateral dura lateral edge and bilateral V-point on axial cuts of cervical magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional spine computed tomography imaging, respectively, from 80 patients. We then calculate the distance and position between the dura lateral edge and the V-point as surgically critical width (SCW). Transverse interdural distance (TIDW), transverse inter-V-point distance, and anatomical facet joint width were measured.
Results
The mean TIDW decreased as the levels down in the 40s–60s but increased at the C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels in the 70s. Statistically significant difference was shown at the C6–7 level between the 40s and the 70s. The mean anatomical inter-V-point distance markedly decreased at C5–6 and continued till the C7–Tl level at all age groups. Moreover, a statistically significant difference was shown at the C3–4 and C4–5 level between the 40s and the 70s. The mean negative values of SCW increased from the 40s to 70s at the C5–6 and C6–7 levels (C5–6: -0.60 ± 1.10 mm to -1.63 ± 1.56 mm; C6–7: -0.90 ± 0.74 mm to -2.18 ± 1.25 mm). There were statistically significant differences between the 2 aged groups at the C3–4, C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels.
Conclusion
A prediction of the correlated position between the lateral dura edge and the V-point is essential for the PECF not to injure the neural structure. In the case of a performing the PECF at the C5–6 and C6–7 level in the old-aged patient, it should be considered the laterally moved dura edge, and more extended bony remove is needed for less neural structure damage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Bone tunnel approach for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with uncovertebral osteophytes
    Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Bo Lei, Chaofan Qin, Xiang Tan, Changjun Pi, Mingxin Chen, Qingshuai Yu, Si Cheng, Zhengjian Yan
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 1848.     CrossRef
  • Complications in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery–Tubular, Uniportal, and Biportal Endoscopic Surgery (2013–2024)
    Noah Willett, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl
    Spine.2026; 51(7): E175.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Craniolateral Inclinatory Foraminotomy
    Tsung-Mu Wu, Jin-Ho Hwang, Moon-Chan Kim, Dae-Jung Choi
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(2): 76.     CrossRef
  • Anatomical Importance Between Neural Structure and Bony Landmark in Neuroventral Decompression for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy
    Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Chaofan Qin, Bo Lei, Mingxin Chen, Ke Ma, Qingyan Long, Qingshuai Yu, Si Cheng, Zhengjian Yan
    Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 286.     CrossRef
  • Single-Incision Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for 2-Level Cervical Radiculopathy
    Florian Wanivenhaus, Christoph Johannes Laux, Sohrab Gollogly, Jin-Sung Kim, Mazda Farshad
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(2): 289.     CrossRef
  • The Anatomical Relationship Between the Cervical Nerve Roots, Intervertebral Discs and Bony Cervical Landmark for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy: A Cadaveric Study
    Gun Keorochana, Chakkraphan Tantrakansakun, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Pilan Jaipanya, Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit, Pittavat Leelapattana, Pongsthorn Chanplakorn, Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(7): 2116.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Controlling the Relaxation of Bony Landmarks Surrounding the Anterior Shoulder in Collegiate Wrestlers on Improving Shoulder Movement
    Na-Young Yoon, Je-Hun Lee, Jin-Kuk Baek
    Annals of Applied Sport Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis
    Seungyoon Paik, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, John Min Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Thamer Hamdan
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281926.     CrossRef
  • Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Thoracic Laminectomy for Thoracic Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: Technical Developments and Outcomes
    Ji Yeon Kim, Ji Soo Ha, Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Chan Lee, Hyun Jin Hong, Su Yong Choi, Choon Keun Park
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent 2-Level Foraminal Lesions Using a Single Approach (Sliding Technique)
    Dong Hwa Heo, Ji Soo Ha, Jae Won Jang
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Full Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Laminoforaminotomy and Discectomy: A Technical Note
    Sukumar Sura, Gaurav Chamle, Abhinandan Reddy Mallepally, Sai Krishna Gadde
    Journal of Spinal Surgery.2023; 10(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • Fully-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical 2-Level Foraminotomy With Total Pediculectomy for Adjacent-Level Foraminal Stenosis in Severe Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note With 1-Year Follow-up
    Hyeun-Sung Kim, Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane, Jin Woo An, Yeon Jin Yi, Il Tae Jang
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(Suppl 1): S92.     CrossRef
  • Overview and Prevention of Complications During Full-Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery
    Young-Rak Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Tae-Hwan Park, Hangeul Park, Sum Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Biportal endoscopic spine surgery for cervical disk herniation: A technical notes and preliminary report
    Seok Bong Jung, Nackhwan Kim
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29751.     CrossRef
  • Expanding Horizons of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery
    Jayesh Sardhara, Ashutosh Kumar
    Journal of Spinal Surgery.2022; 9(4): 186.     CrossRef
  • 9,954 View
  • 356 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Anatomical Relationship of the Vertebral Artery With the Lateral Recess: Clinical Importance for Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2019;16(1):34-40.   Published online March 31, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Anatomical Relationship of the Vertebral Artery With the Lateral Recess: Clinical Importance for Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Neurospine. 2019;16(1):34-40.   Published online March 31, 2019
Close
Objective
Vertebral artery injuries during posterior cervical foraminotomy are rare, but can be fatal. Therefore, we investigated the anatomical correlation between the lateral recess and the vertebral artery.
Methods
On axial cuts of cervical magnetic resonance imaging from 108 patients, we measured the distance between the vertebral arteries and the medial border of the facet joints. The anatomical vertebro-facet distance (AVFD), surgical vertebro-facet distance (SVFD), and vertebro-facet angle (VFA) were measured.
Results
The mean AVFD values on the right side at the C3–4, C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels showed statistically significant differences. On the right side, the mean SVFD values were equivalent to the AVFD values. The mean values of the VFA on the right side at all levels showed statistically significant differences. For all measurements, the greatest differences were seen between the C5–6 and C6–7 levels, and higher levels were associated with smaller distances from the lateral recess. The mean values of the AVFD on the right and left sides showed statistically significant differences at all levels, and the distances on the left were smaller than those on the right.
Conclusion
The vertebral artery is closer to the lateral recess at higher cervical levels than at lower cervical levels. The largest distances were found at the C5–6 and C6–7 levels, and the left vertebral arteries were closer to the lateral recess than the right vertebral arteries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Complications in Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Preventive Strategies
    Vit Kotheeranurak, Pramod V. Lokhande, Thanadol Tangdamrongtham, Teerachat Tassanasoomboon, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Yanting Liu, Jin-Sung Kim, Surachat Jaroenwareekul
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(7): 3379.     CrossRef
  • Single-Incision Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for 2-Level Cervical Radiculopathy
    Florian Wanivenhaus, Christoph Johannes Laux, Sohrab Gollogly, Jin-Sung Kim, Mazda Farshad
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(2): 289.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Microscopic C5-6 Foraminotomy and Discectomy: Operative Nuances
    Het Shah, Manoj Phalak
    Neurology India.2024; 72(5): 976.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Approach for Cervical Disease: Successful Points
    Chien-Wei Liao, Kuo-Tai Chen, Kai-Sheng Chang, Li-wei Sun, Chun Tseng, Chien-Min Chen
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(Suppl 1): S9.     CrossRef
  • Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis
    Seungyoon Paik, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, John Min Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Thamer Hamdan
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281926.     CrossRef
  • Fully-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical 2-Level Foraminotomy With Total Pediculectomy for Adjacent-Level Foraminal Stenosis in Severe Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note With 1-Year Follow-up
    Hyeun-Sung Kim, Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane, Jin Woo An, Yeon Jin Yi, Il Tae Jang
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(Suppl 1): S92.     CrossRef
  • Overview and Prevention of Complications During Full-Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery
    Young-Rak Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Tae-Hwan Park, Hangeul Park, Sum Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • 10,740 View
  • 423 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref

Clinical Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Long Term Effect on Adjacent Segment Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(1):1-6.   Published online March 31, 2014
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Long Term Effect on Adjacent Segment Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
Korean J Spine. 2014;11(1):1-6.   Published online March 31, 2014
Close
Objective

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) is a motion-preserving surgical technique. The objective was to determine whether PCF alter cervical motion as a long-term influence.

Methods

Thirty one patients who followed up more than 36 months after PCF for cervical radiculopathy from January 2004 to September 2008 were enrolled in this study. The range of motion (ROM) of whole cervical spine, the operated segment, the cranial and the caudal adjacent segment were obtained. The clinical result and the change of ROMs were compared with those in the patients performed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) during the same period.

Results

In PCF group, the ROM of whole cervical spine had no significant difference in statistically at preoperative and last follow up. The operated segment ROM was significantly decreased from 11.02±5.72 to 8.82±6.65 (p<0.05). The ROM of cranial adjacent segment was slightly increased from 10.42±5.13 to 11.02±5.41 and the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was decreased from 9.44±6.26 to 8.73±5.92, however these data were not meaningful statistically. In ACDF group, the operated ROM was decreased and unlike in PCF group, especially the ROM of caudal adjacent segment was increased from 9.39±4.21 to 11.33±5.07 (p<0.01).

Conclusion

As part of the long-term effects of PCF on cervical motion, the operated segment motions decreased but were preserved after PCF. However, unlikely after ACDF, the ROMs of the adjacent segment did not increase after PCF. PCF, by maintaining the motion of the operated segment, imposes less stress on the adjacent segments. This may be one of its advantages.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy for Cervical Disc Hernia With Unilateral Radiculopathy
    Idris Gurpinar, Mehmet Yigit Akgun, Furkan Almas, Ozkan Ates
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 149.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of cTDR and Fusion Surgery on Adjacent Level Strain
    Pierce D. Nunley, John A. Hipp, Seth C. Coomer, Amy A. Claeson, Trevor F. Grieco, Richard D. Guyer
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(4): 180.     CrossRef
  • Current role and future perspectives of endoscopic spine surgery: a narrative review
    Hyung-Rae Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2025; 68(8): 528.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Ji Uk Choi, Jae Min Park, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Medicina.2024; 60(9): 1496.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Open Microscopic and Biportal Endoscopic Approaches in Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
    Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Min Park, In-Hee Kim, Jun-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 164.     CrossRef
  • Foraminal Restenosis After Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyeong-Joo Lee, Jae Hwan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Jun Yang, Choon Sung Lee, Sehan Park
    Global Spine Journal.2023; 13(8): 2357.     CrossRef
  • Posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy for Cervical Brachialgia: the FORVAD RCT
    Simon Thomson, Gemma Ainsworth, Senthil Selvanathan, Rachel Kelly, Howard Collier, Ruben Mujica-Mota, Rebecca Talbot, Sarah Tess Brown, Julie Croft, Nikki Rousseau, Ruchi Higham, Yahia Al-Tamimi, Neil Buxton, Nicholas Carleton-Bland, Martin Gledhill, Vict
    Health Technology Assessment.2023; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andrew Platt, Richard G. Fessler, Vincent C. Traynelis, John E. O’Toole
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(7): 1573.     CrossRef
  • Anterior or posterior approach in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy; neurosurgeons’ preference in the Netherlands
    Anne E.H. Broekema, Rob J.M. Groen, Erzsi Tegzess, Michiel F. Reneman, Remko Soer, Jos M.A. Kuijlen
    Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2021; 23: 100930.     CrossRef
  • Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: What does the future hold?
    R. Misra, N.K. Rath
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2021; 22: 101609.     CrossRef
  • Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy
    Sanjay Bhatia, Nathaniel P. Brooks
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2020; 31(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Expanding the horizons of minimally invasive spine surgery
    ArvindG Kulkarni, TusharS Kunder, Swaroop Das, Sandeep Tapashetti
    Indian Spine Journal.2020; 3(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis
    Wenguang Fang, Lijun Huang, Feng Feng, Bu Yang, Lei He, Guizhong Du, Peigen Xie, Zihao Chen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent Segmental Disease after Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Hyun Jun Kim, Min Soo Kang, Sang Ho Lee, Chan Hong Park, Seok Won Chung, Yong Hwan Shin, Shin Young Lee, Eun Soo Park
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2020; 63(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes After Microscopic Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy with a Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up
    Seong Son, Woo Kyung Kim, Sang Gu Lee, Yong Ahn
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 122: e67.     CrossRef
  • Does the Neck Pain, Function, or Range of Motion Differ After Anterior Cervical Fusion, Cervical Disc Replacement, and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy?
    Guang-Xun Lin, Gang Rui, Sagar Sharma, Vit Kotheeranurak, Tsz-King Suen, Jin-Sung Kim
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 129: e485.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Current Trends in Treatment of Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy
    Jung K. Mok, Evan D. Sheha, Andre M. Samuel, Steven J. McAnany, Avani S. Vaishnav, Todd J. Albert, Catherine Himo Gang, Sheeraz Qureshi
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2019; 32(5): E241.     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality-Based Evaluation of Surgical Planning and Outcome of Monosegmental, Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
    Samer Zawy Alsofy, Ralf Stroop, Ivo Fusek, Heinz Welzel Saravia, Ioanna Sakellaropoulou, Murat Yavuz, Christian Ewelt, Makoto Nakamura, Thomas Fortmann
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 129: e857.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy
    Nikhil Sahai, Stuart Changoor, Conor J. Dunn, Kumar Sinha, Ki Soo Hwang, Michael Faloon, Arash Emami
    Spine.2019; 44(24): 1731.     CrossRef
  • UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE
    Grant D. Shifflett, Sravisht Iyer, Peter B. Derman, Philip K. Louie, Howard S. An
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2018; 2(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study
    Conor Dunn, Jeffrey Moore, Nikhil Sahai, Kimona Issa, Michael Faloon, Kumar Sinha, Ki Soo Hwang, Arash Emami
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2018; 29(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    Ivo Peto, Christian Scheiwe, Evangelos Kogias, Ulrich Hubbe
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2017; 30(10): E1419.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review
    Wei‐jun Liu, Ling Hu, Po‐Hsin Chou, Jun‐wen Wang, Wu‐sheng Kan
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2016; 8(4): 425.     CrossRef
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of brachialgia: the Leeds spinal unit experience (2008–2013)
    Senthil K. Selvanathan, Chris Beagrie, Simon Thomson, Rob Corns, Kenan Deniz, Chris Derham, Gerry Towns, Jake Timothy, Deb Pal
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2015; 157(9): 1595.     CrossRef
  • Guideline for Surgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy in Cervical Spondylosis and Disc Hernia
    Toshihiko Inui, Nobuyuki Shimokawa, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Izumi Koyanagi
    Spinal Surgery.2015; 29(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • 11,269 View
  • 92 Download
  • 25 Crossref