Objective To evaluate whether combining clinical frailty with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived posterior paraspinal muscle degeneration identifies perioperative risk phenotypes in adults aged ≥75 years undergoing lumbar fusion.
Methods We retrospectively studied patients aged ≥75 years undergoing lumbar fusion with preoperative lumbar MRI. Frailty was assessed using the Fried phenotype (frail: score ≥3). Posterior paraspinal muscle degeneration across L1–S1 was quantified using automated segmentation and a composite posterior frailty index (PFI); severe degeneration was defined as the upper quartile of PFI. Patients were classified into 4 frailty×muscle phenotypes. Primary outcomes were any in-hospital complication and prolonged length of stay (LOS ≥16 days).
Results Among 248 patients, phenotypes A–D (A, nonfrail/nonsevere; B, frail/nonsevere; C, nonfrail/severe; D, frail/severe) comprised 132, 54, 20, and 42 patients, respectively. Any in-hospital complication occurred in 18.2% of phenotype A compared with 50.0%–57.1% in phenotypes B–D (p<0.001). Prolonged LOS (≥16 days; cohort 75th percentile) occurred in 0.8% of phenotype A versus 38.9% (B), 35.0% (C), and 78.6% (D) (p<0.001), corresponding to absolute risk increases of +34.2 to +77.8 percentage points. After adjustment, higher-risk phenotypes remained independently associated with increased odds of any complication and prolonged LOS; however, the prolonged-LOS odds estimates were imprecise due to sparse events in the reference group. Phenotype was not independently associated with 90-day readmission. Pain improvement (ΔVAS [visual analogue scale]) was attenuated in phenotypes B and D, while differences in ΔODI (Oswestry Disability Index) were not statistically significant.
Conclusion Integrating frailty and MRI-based posterior paraspinal degeneration provides actionable stratification of complication and prolonged LOS risk after lumbar fusion in older adults.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the April 2026 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2026; 23(2): 227. CrossRef
A Commentary on “Frailty-Muscle Phenotypes Predict Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Retrospective Cohort Study” Julie L. Chan, Daniel J. Hoh Neurospine.2026; 23(2): 255. CrossRef
Objective To investigate the relationship between C1 screw trajectory and occipital bone erosion in C1–2 posterior fixation.
Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed 27 patients (54 screws) who underwent C1–2 posterior fixation between March 2018 and March 2023 at a single institution by multiple surgeons. Screws were classified by trajectory: Tan technique (n=39) or Harms-Goel (HG) technique (n=15). Primary outcome was occipital bone erosion; the secondary outcome was breach of inner cortical layer. Per-screw analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations to account for bilateral screw clustering.
Results Mean follow-up was 48.3 (range, 24–84) months. Occipital bone erosion occurred in 51.3% (20 of 39) of Tan screws versus 6.7% (1 of 15) of HG screws (p<0.001). Breach of inner cortical layer occurred exclusively with the Tan technique (10.3% vs. 0%, p=0.302). In mixed Tan+HG cases (n=3), erosion occurred only on the Tan side (2 of 3 screws) with no erosion on HG side (0 of 3 screws). C1 upper line transgression was a critical risk factor; no erosion occurred in screws that did not exceed this anatomical landmark (adjusted relative risk [RR], 6.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41–19.31). Additional risk factors included height O–C1 ≤4.5 mm (RR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.51–6.28) and height O–C1 extension ≤1 mm (RR, 4.86; 95% CI, 2.05–11.53). No patients required reoperation for erosion-related symptoms during follow-up.
Conclusion Screw trajectory is the primary determinant of occipital bone erosion following C1–2 fixation. The HG technique demonstrated significantly lower erosion rates (6.7% vs. 51.3%). When anatomically feasible, HG technique may be considered to reduce erosion risk.
Objective To compare perioperative and complication outcomes, focusing on the prevention of sagittal translation (ST), between a novel “prioritized correction with multiple-rod construct” (PC-MRC) technique and traditional multiple-rod constructs (M-RC) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing 3-column osteotomies (3-COs).
Methods In this retrospective study, 101 ASD patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after 3-COs were divided into 2 groups: PC-MRC (n=65) and M-RC (n=36). The PC-MRC technique involved initial osteotomy closure with short rods followed by global alignment correction with long rods. Radiographic and clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up.
Results The PC-MRC group had significantly shorter operation time and lower estimated blood loss (p=0.045 and p=0.007, respectively). Major coronal and kyphotic deformity correction rates were similar between groups. No significant correction loss occurred at the final follow-up. Crucially, the incidence of ST was significantly lower in the PC-MRC group (1.5% vs. 25.0%, p<0.001). Correspondingly, the overall rate of neurological injury was lower in the PC-MRC group (7.7% vs. 22.2%, p=0.037).
Conclusion The PC-MRC technique offers a versatile and rigid fixation for 3-COs in ASD patients, facilitating significant correction of global deformity. This straightforward technique effectively prevents massive blood loss and ST caused by 3-COs, while minimizing the risk of neurological complication.
Objective To investigate the incidence of postoperative neurological complications among patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery and to determine the significant risk factors for postoperative neurological complications.
Methods Six databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library have been searched to identify observational studies from inception until January 2025. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥10 years with postoperative neurological complications after spinal deformity surgery. Stata/MP18.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis in this review. The summary incidence estimates, proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and weights were pooled by the random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model.
Results The search strategy identified 53 articles with 40,958 patients for final review. Overall incidence of postoperative neurological complications was 7% (95% CI, 5.0%–9.0%; p < 0.001; I2 = 98.34%) in which incidence estimates for patients with adult spinal deformity and underwent 3-column spinal osteotomies were 12% (95% CI, 9%–16%; p < 0.001; I2 = 93.17%) and 18% (95% CI, 8%–31%; p < 0.001; I2 = 94.68%) respectively. Preoperative neurological deficit was the risk factor with highest overall odds ratio (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.85–4.41; p = 0.01; I2 = 76.20%), followed by the presence of kyphosis (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.75–1.70; p = 0.02; I2 = 81.80%) and age at surgery (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.08; p = 0.04; I2 = 68.80%).
Conclusion Preoperative neurological deficit, the presence of kyphosis and age at surgery were significant risk factors for postoperative neurological complications. Therefore, comprehensive preoperative assessment and surgical planning are crucial to minimize the risk of developing postoperative neurological complications or the deterioration of pre-existing neurologic deficits.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Is Medicaid status associated with adverse outcomes following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A propensity score–matched nationwide analysis Abhiram Dawar, Gnaneswar Chundi, Maansi Chalasani, Amog Mysore, Rohan Singh, Christopher Kozak, Robert DalCortivo, Neil K. Kaushal Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Understanding late-onset neurological deficit in severe rigid Scoliosis: A comprehensive review Siddharth S. Sethy, Nikhil Goyal, Aakash Jain, Syed Ifthekar, Vibhor Abrol, Pratibha Bhatia Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 70: 103175. CrossRef
A Commentary on “The Contribution of Paraspinal Sarcopenia on Sagittal Imbalance in Degenerative Kyphosis” Worawat Limthongkul Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 692. CrossRef
Proximal Lower Extremity Weakness Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity: Influence of Correction Level and Clinical Outcomes Shinsuke Sato, Yusuke Nakao, Shingo Kumaki, Shigeo Sano Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Postoperative Experience of Older Adult Patients Who Underwent Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Study Wonhee Baek, Yujin Suh, Hana Lee Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2025; 32(4): 456. CrossRef
Our research examines the learning curves of various minimally invasive lumbar surgeries to determine the benefits and challenges they pose to both surgeons and patients. The advent of microsurgical techniques since the 1960s, including advances in fluoroscopic navigation and intraoperative computed tomography, has significantly shifted spinal surgery from open to minimally invasive methods. This study critically evaluates surgical duration, intraoperative conversions to open surgery, and complications as primary parameters to gauge these learning curves. Through a comprehensive literature search up to March 2024, involving databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, this paper identifies a steep learning curve associated with these surgeries. Despite their proven advantages in reducing recovery time and surgical trauma, these procedures require surgeons to master advanced technology and equipment, which can directly impact patient outcomes. The study underscores the need for well-defined learning curves to facilitate efficient training and enhance surgical proficiency, especially for novice surgeons. Moreover, it addresses the implications of technology on surgical accuracy and the subsequent effects on complication rates, providing insights into the complex dynamics of adopting new surgical innovations in spinal health care.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Analgesia peridural caudal como manejo de dolor postquirúrgico en cirugía de columna lumbar: serie de 20 casos Marvin Gabriel Cruz Álvarez, Ana Lilia Guerrero Molina, Ozcar Felipe García López Cirugía de Columna.2026; 4(2): 85. CrossRef
Eficacia y seguridad de técnicas mínimamente invasivas para la descompresión lumbosacra en pacientes con dolor radicular: análisis retrospectivo de hemilaminectomía, discectomía y técnica over-the-top en un hospital de segundo nivel Jorge Andrés Esparza Piña, Luis Mario Uribe Cirugía de Columna.2026; 4(2): 102. CrossRef
Improvement in low back pain following endoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis Maria Auron, Yihyun Roh, Maria C. Pedraza Ciro, Win Boonsirikamchai, Yi-Hao Liang, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105995. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Complication Management During Uniportal and Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Dural Tear and Bleeding Siravich Suvithayasiri, Ju Eun Kim, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Marcus Serra, Christopher Martin, Viswanadha Arunkumar, Sotirios Veranis, Prashanth Rao, Enrico Giordan, Piya Chavalparit, Nelson Astur, Samuel Cho, Jin Sung Kim Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sophie-Liliane Rosenke, Myles Kisekka, Hiend Darweesh, Brawin Kajenthra, Jake Hewitt, Daniele Ramsay, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Dragan Jankovic, Daniel Scurtu, Darius Kalasauskas, Andreas Kramer, Florian Ringel, Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic resection of lumbar intradural spinal tumors: A case series on feasibility, safety, and preliminary outcomes Facundo Van Isseldyk, Vincent Hagel Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106040. CrossRef
Letter to the Editor regarding “Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Transforaminal Approach (MI-FLT) to ventrally located intradural lesions of the thoracic spine without instability: case series and technical note” Preeti Lamba Neurochirurgie.2026; : 101820. CrossRef
O‐Arm Navigation Enhances Facet Preservation Without Compromising Clinical Outcomes in UBE Decompression for Radiographically Stable Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Single‐Center Comparative Study Yi Liu, Yiwei Xie, Zhibao Chen, Ruijun Xu, Haojie Chen, Xiaojian Ye, Jiangming Yu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390. CrossRef
Prevalence and treatment outcomes of incidental dural tears in lumbar spine surgery M. Mofizur Rahman, Mohammad Abdul Hannan, M. Sarwar Jahan, Moniruzzaman Monir International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics.2025; 11(5): 991. CrossRef
Blake I. Boadi, Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Rachel Bratescu, Mazin Omer, Osama N. Kashlan, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl
Neurospine 2024;21(3):770-803. Published online September 30, 2024
Objective Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) employs small incisions and advanced techniques to minimize tissue damage while achieving similar outcomes to open surgery. MISS offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. This review analyzes complications associated with MISS over the last 10 years, highlighting common issues and the impact of technological advancements.
Methods A systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase via OVID, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from January 2013 to March 2024. Keywords related to MISS and complications were used. Studies on adult patients undergoing MISS with tubular, uniportal, or biportal endoscopy, reporting intraoperative or postoperative complications, were included. Non-English publications, abstracts, and small case series were excluded. Data on MISS approach, patient demographics, and complications were extracted and reviewed by 2 independent researchers.
Results The search identified 880 studies, with 137 included after screening and exclusions. Key complications in cervical MISS were hematomas, transient nerve root palsy, and dural tears. In thoracic MISS, complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks and durotomy. In lumbar MISS, common complications were incidental dural injuries, postoperative neuropathic conditions, and disc herniation recurrences. Complications varied by surgical approach.
Conclusion MISS offers reduced anatomical disruption compared to open surgery, potentially decreasing nerve injury risk. However, complications such as nerve injuries, durotomies, and hardware misplacement still occur. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and advanced technologies like navigation can help mitigate these risks. Despite variability in complication rates, MISS remains a safe, effective alternative with ongoing advancements enhancing its outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Meta-Analysis of Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (2013–2024) Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Noah Willett, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl, Osama Kashlan Spine.2026; 51(3): E47. CrossRef
Endoskopische Zugänge zur Brustwirbelsäule Vincent Hagel, Gregor Gaudin Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (2013–2024): Lumbar Spine—Tubular Minimally Invasive Techniques Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Noah Willett, Mousa Hamad, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Ibrahim Hussain, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl Spine.2026; 51(4): E78. CrossRef
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (2013–2024) Sean Inzerillo, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Eesha Gurav, Noah Willett, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl, Osama Kashlan Spine.2026; 51(5): E133. CrossRef
Development and evaluation of a simple CT-based DXA triage score for osteoporosis in candidates for lumbar spine surgery Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Extracellular Vesicle-Based Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: A State-of-the-Art Review on Diagnostic and Prognostic Advances Trung Nhan Vo, Hae Eun Shin, Yeji Kim, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2026; 27(4): 2079. CrossRef
Complications in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery–Tubular, Uniportal, and Biportal Endoscopic Surgery (2013–2024) Noah Willett, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl Spine.2026; 51(7): E175. CrossRef
High-Speed Instance Segmentation for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Multicenter Validation and Inference Speed Evaluation Yoon Jae Cho, Yong Jae Cho, Yong Geon Park, Myung Soo Youn, Yun Hak Kim, Kyoungjune Pak, Hong Jin Kim, Jung Sub Lee, Tae Sik Goh Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of Navigation Systems With Smart Delivery Tools in Enhancing the Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Takeshi Umebayashi, Yasukazu Hijikata, Takaoki Kimura, Nahoko Kikuchi, Takeshi Hara, Keiichi Tsuda, Shinji Kumamoto, Daichi Kawamura Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Strategies for Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Evan Wang, Ibrahim Hussain Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S139. CrossRef
Rate and fate of incidental durotomies in spine surgery Varunil N. Shah, Anish R. Kosanam, Mohit Patel, Manish K. Kasliwal Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111184. CrossRef
CORR Insights®: Is Civilian Hospital Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Disorders Associated With Greater Odds of Fusion Procedures? Jiayong Liu Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2025; 483(10): 1948. CrossRef
Enhanced Visualization, Reduced Burden: Endoscopic versus Tubular Spine Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis Schahin Salmanian, Samantha Schimmel, Bryan Clampitt, Maya Toothman, Petra Allen, Chloe Chose, Cesar Carballo, Diego Soto-Rubio, Jay Kumar, Puya Alikhani, Patrick Kim World Neurosurgery.2025; 200: 124186. CrossRef
Intraoperative strategies to enhance recovery in spine surgery Shriya N. Patel, Sloane O. Ward, Mattin Moazzam, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh Seminars in Spine Surgery.2025; 37(3): 101186. CrossRef
Minimally invasive or open surgery? Decoding the safer path in thoracolumbar burst fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis Rieva Ermawan, Muhammad Shokhiful Wafa Arya Wida Sena, Fakhrul Azhar, M. Fariz Firjatullah, Ali Rofiq Khizna Dani, Muhammad Habibbuddin Patriadi Nuhriawangsa Journal of Orthopaedic Reports.2025; : 100786. CrossRef
Technical Note: Intraoperative Injection of Indigo Carmine for Differentiating Neural Tissue During Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery Woon Tak Yuh, Chan Yang Noh, Il Choi, Junsoo Jang Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2025; 10(2): 313. CrossRef
Technical Progress and Clinical Application of Spinal Endoscopy in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 繁道 孔 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(12): 1410. CrossRef
Commentary on “Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review” Gregory Snigur, John Sencaj, Sloane Ward, Shriya Patel, Luis Salazar, Kern Singh Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 804. CrossRef
Objective To identify risk factors and establish radiographic criteria for distal junctional failure (DJF) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), who underwent fusion surgery stopping at L5.
Methods This retrospective study was undertaken from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients with ASD who underwent fusion surgery (≥5 levels) stopping at L5 were analyzed. DJF was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment pathology at the lumbosacral junction necessitating consideration for revision surgery. Demographic data and radiographic measurements were compared between the DJF and non-DJF groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the radiographic cutoff value for DJF.
Results Among 76 patients, 16 (21.1%) experienced DJF. DJF was associated with older age, antidepressant/anxiolytic medication, longer level of fusions, and worse preoperative sagittal alignment. Antidepressant/anxiolytic medication (odds ratio, 5.60) and preoperative pelvic incidence (PI)–lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch>40° (odds ratio, 5.87) were independent risk factors for DJF. Without both factors, the incidence of DJF has been greatly reduced (9.1%). Two radiographic criteria were determined for DJF: last distal junctional angle (DJA)>-5° and Δ last DJA–post DJA>5°. When both criteria were met, the sensitivity and specificity of the DJF were 93.3% and 91.7%, respectively.
Conclusion Use of antidepressant/anxiolytic medication and preoperative PI–LL mismatch >40° were independent risk factors for DJF. DJF could be diagnosed using postoperative changes in the DJA. If both criteria were met, DJF could be strongly suggested.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
L5 vs. pelvic fixation as the lowest instrumented vertebra in long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Faramarz Roohollahi, Natalie J. Bales, Anjali Pradhan, Sawyer Bauer, Katherine E. Baker, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Dana Saleh, Diego Soto Rubio, Patrick Kim, Waseem Aziz, Mark Greenberg, Mohsen Rostami, Puya Alikhani Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
An Innovative Technique of Revision Surgery for Distal Junctional Failure Masato Tanaka, Savvas Moschos, Chen B Jein, Aman Verma, Mohammed A Rezk Sharaf E H Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Distal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure in Adult Deformity Surgery Down to L5: Commentary on “Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria” Teppei Suzuki, Takashi Yurube Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 865. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the September 2024 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 743. CrossRef
Objective To avoid the most offending surgical instrument for dural tears, we develop a “no-punch” decompression technique for unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery.
Methods This retrospective study enrolled 68 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis segments. The treatment results were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Results This study included 36 male and 32 female patients who received 109 segments of decompression, with an average age of 68.7 (37–90 years). The average operation time was 52.2 minutes. The average hospital stay was 3.1 days. There were no dural tears but 3 minor surgical complications, all treated conservatively. The VAS for low back and leg pain improved from 4.6 and 7.0 to 0.8 and 1.2. The JOA score improved from 16.2 to 26.8, with an improvement rate of 82.0%. The ODI improved from 50.1 to 18.7. All these improvements were statistically significant. The cross-sectional dural area improved from 61.1 to 151.3 mm2, with an average increase of 90.2 mm2 and 205.3%. 87.1% of the ipsilateral facet joints and 84.7% of the contralateral facet joints were preserved. In 61% of the decompressed segments, the ipsilateral facet joints were preserved better than the contralateral facet joints.
Conclusion The UBE “no-punch” decompression technique effectively avoids the dural tears. It provides effective neural decompression, excellent facet joint preservation, and good treatment outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy vs. microdiscectomy in lumbar disc herniation Yi He, Peng-fei Cao, Yin Zhang, Xun-an Xu, Tong-guang Xu Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Complications and their prevention in unilateral biportal endoscopy: a systematic review with narrative insights and practical management algorithms Xavier A. Santander, Martin N. Stienen, Stefan Motov, Héctor U. Quintanilla, Elsa González Pérez Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The influence of the positional relationship between the pedicle and the pars interarticularis on unilateral biportal endoscopy: A retrospective cohort study Shaoning Shen, Tingyuan Lai, Hao Wei, Wangnan Mao, Lianguo Wu, Hanbing Zeng Medicine.2026; 105(12): e47945. CrossRef
Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation Jing Zhang, Zhinan Ren, Lei Yu, Cheng Peng, Yingjie Hao BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis Chandrashekhar Vijay Gaike, Shraddha Dattatraya Kardile, Girish Namdevrao Gadekar, Saurabh Shrikant Kulkarni International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences.2025; 11: e004. CrossRef
A Comparative Study of the No-Punch Technique in Reducing Surgical Complications Associated with Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Jwo-Luen Pao, Chun-Chien Chang Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(20): 7295. CrossRef
Unilateral biportal endoscopy for the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion in elderly patients: a matched comparison study Hongwei Duan, Minghui Liang, Yu Xi, Ruiyuan Chen, Ning Fan, Tianyi Wang, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Double-Cage Technique Jwo-Luen Pao Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2024; 9(2): 203. CrossRef
Objective To evaluate C2 muscle preservation effect and the radiological and clinical outcomes after C2 recapping laminoplasty.
Methods Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent C2 recapping laminoplasty around C1–2 level were enrolled. To evaluate muscle preservation effect, the authors conducted a morphological measurement of extensor muscles between the operated and nonoperated side. Two surgeons measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) and semispinalis cervicis (SSC) muscle before and after surgery to determine atrophy rates (ARs). Additionally, we examined range of motion (ROM), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), neck visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score to assess potential changes in alignment and consequent clinical outcomes following posterior cervical surgery.
Results We measured the CSA of OCI and SSC before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Based on these measurements, the AR of the nonoperated SSC was 0.1% ± 8.5%, the AR of the operated OCI was 2.0% ± 7.2%, and the AR of the nonoperated OCI was -0.7% ± 5.1% at the 12 months after surgery. However, the AR of the operated side’s SSC was 11.2% ± 12.5%, which is a relatively higher value than other measurements. Despite the atrophic change of SSC on the operated side, there were no prominent changes observed in SVA, C0–2 ROM, and C2–7 ROM between preoperative and 12 months postoperative measurements, which were 11.8 ± 10.9 mm, 16.3° ± 5.9°, and 48.7° ± 7.7° preoperatively, and 14.1 ± 11.6 mm, 16.1° ± 7.2°, and 44.0° ± 10.3° at 12 months postoperative, respectively. Improvement was also noted in VAS, NDI, and JOA scores after surgery with JOA recovery rate of 77.3% ± 29.6%.
Conclusion C2 recapping laminoplasty could be a useful tool for addressing pathologies around the upper cervical spine, potentially mitigating muscle atrophy and reducing postoperative neck pain, while maintaining sagittal alignment and ROM.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Craniopharyngioma Quality of Life (C-QOL) Index: a preliminary disease-specific, patient-centered tool for assessing patient reported outcomes in adult craniopharyngioma patients Saket Myneni, Shaan Bhandarkar, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, A. Karim Ahmed, Foad Kazemi, João Paulo Almeida, Anand V. Germanwala, Andrew S. Venteicher, Nathan T. Zwagerman, Eric W. Wang, Garret Choby, Erin L. McKean, Carl H. Snyderman, Nicholas R. Rowan, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Two Posterior Minimally Invasive Approaches for Odontoid Fractures: Midline Nuchal Ligament Approach vs. Paramedian Muscle‐Splitting Approach Youcai Qiu, Liang Wang, Yijin Wang, Yang Li, Xuhua Lu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026; 18(1): 74. CrossRef
Techniques for Cervical Laminoplasty Newton Cho, Ankit I. Mehta, Aditya Vedantam, C. Rory Goodwin, Uzondu F. Agochukwu, Lukas Grassner, Aria Nouri, Bizhan Aarabi, Jefferson R. Wilson, Nathan Evaniew Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
C2-Involving Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL): Dome-like Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion Jun Jae Shin, Sun Joon Yoo, Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Yoon Ha Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The skull base chordoma patient reported outcome survey (sbCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in chordoma patients Saket Myneni, Linda Tang, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, A. Karim Ahmed, Foad Kazemi, Nicolas Dea, Nathan T. Zwagerman, Shirley Y. Su, Garret Choby, Eric W. Wang, Kristin J. Redmond, Erin L. McKean, Carl H. Snyderman, Nicholas R. Rowan, Debraj Mukherjee Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2025; 173(1): 157. CrossRef
The Spinal Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (spCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in spinal chordoma patients Saket Myneni, Linda Tang, Hanan Akbari, Raquel Mayne, Foad Kazemi, Ruiwen Xiong, Kristin J. Redmond, Mark H. Bilsky, Raphaële Charest-Morin, Daniel G. Tobert, Vikram Chakravarthy, Ganesh M. Shankar, Sheng-Fu L. Lo, John H. Shin, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Daniel Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2025; 175(2): 813. CrossRef
Hong Kyung Shin, Jin Hoon Park, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Yong-Jae Cho, for the Korean Spinal Deformity Society (KSDS)
Neurospine 2023;20(4):1469-1476. Published online December 31, 2023
Objective Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI.
Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted.
Results Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01).
Conclusion IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A biomechanical study comparing combined S1AI and S3AI trajectories to other pelvic fixation techniques: A finite element analysis William Sheppard, Arpan A. Patel, Colin Rhoads, Landon Reading, Theodore Rudic, Joshua Wiener, Matthew Magro, Lauren M. Boden, Thomas Olson, Jason Savage, Michael Steinmetz, Edin Nevzati, Alexander Spiessberger Clinical Biomechanics.2026; 131: 106712. CrossRef
Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality of Meta-Analyses Comparing Sacral 2 Alar–Iliac Fixation with Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Umbrella Review with Emphasis on Methodological Limitations Ali Haider Bangash, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell S. Fourman, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jaime A. Gomez, C. Rory Goodwin, Peter G. Passias, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 753. CrossRef
Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes Hanyu Qiu, Dhruvish Patel, Moriah Thompson, Piper Tingleaf, Kishore Balasubramanian, Peter G. Passias, Luis M. Tumialan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Nitin Agrawal, Ali K. Ozturk, Hakeem J. Shakir, John F. Burke, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith, Andrew Jea, Angela E. Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of Porous Pelvic Fixation Implants in Multilevel Spine Fusion Surgery John Caridi, Richard Menger, Christopher Martin, Alexander Lemons, Isador Lieberman, Jeffrey Mullin, Jonathan Sembrano, Khalid Odeh, Evalina Burger, Taylor Lawson, Christopher J. Kleck Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
S2AI and iliac screw prominence and removal for symptomatic prominence: a systematic review Rafael Garcia, Kari Odland, Paul Lender, David Polly European Spine Journal.2025; 34(4): 1398. CrossRef
S2AI vs. iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Sleiman Haddad, Riccardo Raganato, Yann Philippe Charles, Franciso Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Ahmet Alanay, Ferran Pellise, Javier Pizones European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Screw Loosening in S2 Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity Yasuhiro Nagatani, Hiroaki Nakashima, Tokumi Kanemura, Mikito Tsushima, Hiroyuki Tomita, Kazuaki Morishita, Hiroki Oyama, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yukihito Ode, Yuya Okada, Shiro Imagama Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(6): 1881. CrossRef
A biomechanical study on bilateral SAI annular fixation in the treatment of unilateral Denis Ⅱ sacral fractures Peishuai Zhao, Chengfei Peng, Honghu Lin, Wuqing Wei, Weiyi Pang, Chaoyong Bei Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111221. CrossRef
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Spinopelvic Fixation - What are the Key Items to Understand Performance? Robert Ravinsky, Stephen Lewis, Charles Fisher, David Polly Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(6): 2855. CrossRef
Low rates of pain requiring sacroiliac joint fusion after countersunk iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation Rahul Kishore Chaliparambil, Mykhaylo Krushelnytskyy, Rishi Jain, Mehul Mittal, Amr Alwakeal, Muhammad T. Hassan, Nishanth S. Sadagopan, Pavlos Texakalidis, Najib El Tecle, Nader S. Dahdaleh, Tyler Koski Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(3): 284. CrossRef
Comparative efficacy of S2-alar-iliac versus iliac screw techniques in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications Amit Saraf, Sanjeev Kumar Jain, Sonika Sharma Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(5): 847. CrossRef
What’s New in Spine Surgery Melvin D. Helgeson, Alfred J. Pisano, Donald R. Fredericks, Scott C. Wagner Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2024; 106(12): 1035. CrossRef
Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes Anouar Bourghli, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100516. CrossRef
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients’ quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF’s pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Relative influence of paraspinal muscularity and underlying bone quality on proximal junctional kyphosis and failure mode in patients undergoing thoracolumbar instrumented fusion Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Michael L. Martini, Andrew J. Grossbach, Gabriella L. Paganucci, Ahmad N. Nassr, Brett A. Freedman, Arjun Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2026; 261: 109286. CrossRef
Differential Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Between T8-T10 and T11-L1 Upper Instrumented Vertebrae in Adult Spinal Deformity Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Neurologic deficits due to proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: how often do they happen and do they improve? Hani Chanbour, Alan R. Tang, Harsh Jain, Alexander T. Lyons, Soren Jonzzon, Iyan Younus, Steven G. Roth, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between lumbar lordosis and proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Abdullah M. Alharran, AbdulMuhsen AlQallaf, Mohammad Mohammad, Mohammad Salem Alajmi, Mohammad Alkaak, Salem Y. Alenezi, Fahad Mohammad, Ahmad Al Ahmad, Nizar Algarni, Yousef Marwan Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Hook Fixation and Vertebroplasty for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study Sung Tan Cho, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Sehan Park, Jin Hwan Kim, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Proximal junctional kyphosis above long spinal fusions Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.2025; 111(1): 104065. CrossRef
Sex-Specific Influence of Preoperative Musculoskeletal Characteristics on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study Seungjun Ryu, Danbi Park, Ji Yeon Baek, Chongman Kim, Hong Kyung Shin, Sun Woo Jang, Jeoung Hee Kim, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park World Neurosurgery.2025; 194: 123435. CrossRef
The Paraspinal Sarcopenia at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Is a Predictor of Discoligamentous but Not Bony Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Maria Astudillo Potes, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A. Freedman, Arjun S. Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Benjamin D. Elder Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1207. CrossRef
Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, Jensen Smith, Nicole McGrath, Leah Y. Carreon Spine.2025; 50(5): 304. CrossRef
The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional failure after limited lumbar fusion for adult spinal deformity Hiroshi Moridaira, Satoshi Inami, Masahiko Takahata, Daisaku Takeuchi, Haruki Ueda, Takuya Iimura, Tomoya Kanto, Satoshi Takada, Kazuo Doi, Hiroshi Taneichi BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review Paolo Brigato, Gianluca Vadalà, Sergio De Salvatore, Leonardo Oggiano, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Pier Francesco Costici, Vincenzo Denaro Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104273. CrossRef
A comprehensive review of risk factors and prevention strategies: how to minimize mechanical complications in corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity Jin-Sung Park, Hyun-Jun Kim, Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(3): 463. CrossRef
The relationship between postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis and MRI-based pedicle bone quality scores in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Junhu Li, Qiujiang Li, Linnan Wang, Zhipeng Deng, Shuxin Zheng, Lei Wang, Yueming Song BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Early catastrophic proximal junctional fracture after spinal instrumentation in geriatric patients Celal Özbek Çakır, Murat Baloglu Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(3): 586. CrossRef
Radiologische Diagnostik bei Wirbelsäulentraumata in besonderen Konstellationen Umut Yilmaz, Malvina Garner Die Radiologie.2025; 65(11): 815. CrossRef
Mitigating Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure: The Role of Tethering in a Multifactorial Problem – A Commentary on “Efficacy of Proximal Junctional Tethering in Spinal Fusion Surgery for Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctiona Niall Buckley, Ashel C. Dsouza, Lee A. Tan Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 678. CrossRef
Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density: Correlating MRI Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality, CT Hounsfield Units, and DEXA T-Scores Rose Fluss, Riana Lo Bu, Alireza Karandish, Sertac Kirnaz, Rafael De la Garza Ramos, Saikiran G. Murthy, Reza Yassari, Yaroslav Gelfand Medical Sciences.2025; 13(4): 304. CrossRef
Predicting proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning models based on spinal alignment parameters Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Features of approximation of finite-element models of transpedicular spinal fixation and their computational efficiency Aleksey E. Shulga, Mikhail S. Korolev, Sergey P. Ivzhenko, Daniil M. Puchinyan, Vladimir S. Tolkachev, Stanislav D. Shuvalov Journal of Volgograd State Medical University.2025; 22(4): 107. CrossRef
Optimizing Surgical Strategies for Preventing Proximal Junctional Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques in Adult Spinal Deformity HyungSub Jin, Kyung-Soo Suk, Byung Ho Lee, Si Young Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Sub-Ri Park, Namhoo Kim, Jae Won Shin, Ji-Won Kwon Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 1012. CrossRef
Instrumentation Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients David P. Falk, Ravi Agrawal, Bijan Dehghani, Rohit Bhan, Sachin Gupta, Munish C. Gupta Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4326. CrossRef
Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient Umesh S. Metkar, W. Jacob Lavelle, Kylan Larsen, Ram Haddas, William F. Lavelle North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100531. CrossRef
Cyphose jonctionnelle proximale au-dessus des fusions rachidiennes étendues Léonard Chatelain, Abbas Dib, Louise Ponchelet, Emmanuelle Ferrero Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique.2024; 110(6): 761. CrossRef
Optimizing preoperative bone health assessment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective correlation analysis of intraoperative pedicle screw insertion torque and imaging modalities in Japan Keishi Maruo, Fumihiro Arizumi, Tomoyuki Kusukawa, Masakazu Toi, Masaru Hatano, Tetsuto Yamaura, Kazuya Kishima, Toshiya Tachibana Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(4): 532. CrossRef
Proximal Junctional Degeneration and Failure Modes Riza M. Cetik, Steven D. Glassman, John R. Dimar, Mitchell J. Campbell, Mladen Djurasovic, Charles H. Crawford, Jeffrey L. Gum, R. Kirk Owens, Kathryn J. McCarthy, Leah Y. Carreon Spine.2024; 49(21): 1465. CrossRef
Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits Sun-Joon Yoo, Hyun-Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Jeong-Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong-Kyu Chin, Keun-Su Kim, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Kyung-Hyun Kim Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1219. CrossRef
Risk Factors, Biomechanics, and Prevention Strategies for Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery – A Commentary on “Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignm Lee A. Tan Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1094. CrossRef
Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1080. CrossRef
Justin K. Scheer, Justin S. Smith, Peter G. Passias, Han Jo Kim, Shay Bess, Douglas C. Burton, Eric O. Klineberg, Virginie Lafage, Munish Gupta, Christopher P. Ames, The International Spine Study Group
Neurospine 2023;20(3):837-848. Published online September 30, 2023
Objective The goal of this study was to determine if patients with mild scoliosis and age-appropriate sagittal alignment have favorable outcomes following surgical correction.
Methods Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database. Inclusion criteria: operative patients age ≥18 years, and preoperative pelvic tilt, mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI–LL), and C7 sagittal vertical axis all within established age-adjusted thresholds with minimum 2-year follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS22R), back/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale and minimum clinically important difference (MCID)/substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Two-year and preoperative HRQoL radiographic data were compared. Patients with mild scoliosis (Mild Scoli, Max coronal Cobb 10°–30°) were compared to those with larger curves (Scoli).
Results One hundred fifty-one patients included from 667 operative patients (82.8% women; average age, 56.4 ± 16.2 years). Forty-two patients (27.8%) included in Mild Scoli group. Mild Scoli group had significantly worse baseline leg pain, ODI, and physical composite scores (p < 0.02). Mean 2-year maximum coronal Cobb angle was significantly improved compared to baseline (p < 0.001). All 2-year HRQoL measures were significantly improved compared to (p < 0.001) except mental composite score, SRS activity and SRS mental for the Mild Scoli group (p > 0.05). From the mild Scoli group, 36%–74% met either MCID or SCB for the HRQoL measures. Sixty-four point three percent had minimum 1 complication, 28.6% had a major complication, 35.7% had reoperation.
Conclusion Mild scoliosis patients with age-appropriate sagittal alignment benefit from surgical correction, decompression, and stabilization at 2 years postoperative despite having a high complication rate.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Subject‐Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling: The Future of Predicting and Preventing Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Nima Ashjaee, Alexa Semonche, Anthony L. Mikula, Laszlo Kiss, Dennis E. Anderson, Dominika Ignasiak, Stephen H. M. Brown, John Street, Sidney Fels, Samuel R. Ward, Christopher Ames, Thomas R. Oxland JOR SPINE.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective Based on traditional dual growing rods (TDGR), apical control techniques (ACTs) were introduced as adjuvant procedures to improve deformity correction at the apex segment in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). We aimed to explore whether TDGR+ ACTs have different indications, attain more deformity correction, have negative effects on spinal growth, and have different complications.
Methods Between 2004 and 2019, a retrospective study of EOS patients treated with TDGR with or without ACTs was conducted and divided into 3 groups: TDGR group; hybrid technique (HT) group: Vertebrectomy/hemivertebrectomy with short fusion and TDGR; ACPS group: apical convex control pedicle screws (ACPS) and TDGR. Demographic, radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, complications, and revisions were analyzed and compared.
Results Seventy-eight EOS patients were enrolled. The preoperative main curve was the largest in the HT group. ACPS group had the smallest residual curve (19° ± 8.9°) and apical vertebral translation (12.0 ± 9.0 mm) at the latest follow-up, followed by the HT group (30° ± 17.4°, 22.1 ± 13.4 mm) and TDGR group (30° ± 13.2°, 32.8 ± 17.1 mm). ACPS group had the largest T1–12 height and T1–S1 height after index surgery. Complications and revisions in the ACTs groups was lower than the TDGR group. Scoliosis Research Society-22 self-image questionnaire was superior in the ACPS group.
Conclusion According to our intermediate results, TDGR+ACTs could improve correction ability of apex deformity. ACTs had little deleterious effects on spinal height during the lengthening procedures, with a lower complication rate than TDGR. TDGR+ACTs might be a supplemental option for suitable EOS patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Current Knowledge of Respiratory Function in Early Onset Scoliosis and the Effect of Its Contemporary Surgical Treatment Sai Gautham Balasubramanian, David Fender, Paul Rushton Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 754. CrossRef
Outcomes of Traditional Dual Growing Rods With Apical Control Techniques for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: Comparison With Patients Treated With Traditional Dual Growing Rods Only With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Graduation Chenkai Li, Xiaohan Ye, Yang Yang, Guanfeng Lin, Jianxiong Shen, Yu Zhao, Nan Wu, Qianyu Zhuang, Shengru Wang, Jianguo Zhang Neurosurgery.2025; 96(5): 975. CrossRef
Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital scoliosis Zhiming Peng, Haoran Zhang, Shengru Wang, Jianguo Zhang European Journal of Medical Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective This retrospective cohort study has been aimed at evaluating the incidence of complications after vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) and analyzing some cases. Furthermore, the complications of VBSO were compared with those of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).
Methods This study included 154 patients who underwent VBSO (n = 109) or ACCF (n = 45) for cervical myelopathy and were followed up for > 2 years. Surgical complications, clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed.
Results The most common surgical complications after VBSO were dysphagia (n = 8, 7.3%) and significant subsidence (n = 6, 5.5%). There were 5 cases of C5 palsy (4.6%), followed by dysphonia (n = 4, 3.7%), implant failure (n = 3, 2.8%), pseudoarthrosis (n = 3, 2.8%), dural tears (n = 2, 1.8%), and reoperation (n = 2, 1.8%). C5 palsy and dysphagia did not require additional treatment and spontaneously resolved. The rates of reoperation (VBSO, 1.8%; ACCF, 11.1%; p = 0.02) and subsidence (VBSO, 5.5%; ACCF, 40%; p < 0.01) were significantly lower in VBSO than in ACCF. VBSO restored more C2–7 lordosis (VBSO, 13.9° ± 7.5°; ACCF, 10.1° ± 8.0°; p = 0.02) and segmental lordosis (VBSO, 15.7° ± 7.1°; ACCF, 6.6° ± 10.2°; p < 0.01) than ACCF. The clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between both groups.
Conclusion VBSO has advantages over ACCF in terms of low rate of surgical complications related to reoperation and significant subsidence. However, dural tears may still occur despite the lessened need for ossified posterior longitudinal ligament lesion manipulation in VBSO; hence, caution is warranted.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparative efficacy and safety of ACAF, ACCF, and laminoplasty for multilevel cervical OPLL: A network meta-analysis of observational studies Wei Wang, Cheng-Hao Xiang, Dan Li, Xian-Zao Wang, Xin-Hua Xu Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The number of fusion levels as a potential factor influencing long-term complications of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion: a biomechanical analysis Gaole He, Haopeng Li, Liang Yan, Zhongkai Liu, Teng Lu Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement Fusion (ACAF) in Revision Surgery for Iatrogenic Cervical Kyphosis: Technical Note and Case Series Zhenlei Liu, Yaobin Wang, Lei Zhang, Shanhang Jia, He Wang, Lei Cheng, Fengzeng Jian, Kai Wang, Hao Wu Orthopaedic Surgery.2025; 17(4): 1265. CrossRef
Novel radiologic parameter for assessing decompression adequacy in anterior cervical decompression surgery: the V-line Dong-Ho Lee, Sung Tan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Sehan Park, Jin Hwan Kim, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang The Spine Journal.2025; 25(9): 1928. CrossRef
A narrative review of surgical approaches in cervical degenerative myelopathy and update of the algorithm for decision making Majid Reza Farrokhi, Seyed Reza Mousavi, Abbas Khosravifarsani, Jaloliddin Mavlonov, Mohammadhadi Amir Shahpari Motlagh, Seyed Bahram Seif, Armin Akbarzadeh Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage by Pump-Regulated Volumetric Continuous Lumbar Drainage Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Sun Woo Jang, Sang Hyub Lee, Hong Kyung Shin, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Jin Hoon Park Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1421. CrossRef
Objective The objective of this study is to assess differences in complication profiles between 3-level posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and single-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) as both are reported to provide similar degrees of sagittal correction.
Methods The PearlDiver database was queried retrospectively using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th edition and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients who underwent PCO or PSO for degenerative spine disease. Patients under age 18 or with history of spinal malignancy, infection, or trauma were excluded. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts, 3-level PCO or single-level PSO, matched at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and number of fused posterior segments. Thirtyday systemic and procedure-related complications were compared.
Results Matching resulted in 631 patients for each cohort. PCO patients had decreased odds of respiratory (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.82; p = 0.001) and renal complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40–0.88; p = 0.009) compared to PSO patients. There was no significant difference in cardiac complications, sepsis, pressure ulcer, dural tear, delirium, neurologic injuries, postoperative hematoma, postoperative anemia, or overall complications.
Conclusion Patients who undergo 3-level PCO have decreased respiratory and renal complications compared to single-level PSO. No differences were found in the other complications studied. Considering both procedures achieve similar sagittal correction, surgeons should be aware that 3-level PCO offers an improved safety profile compared to single-level PSO.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Neurological Complications Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): A Systematic Review Takeshi Fujii, Rakesh Kumar, Jihun Cha, Aiyush Bansal, Rafael Garcia de Oliveira, Philip K. Louie, Venu M. Nemani, Jean-Christophe Leveque, Rajiv K. Sethi Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 734. CrossRef
Anterior Column Realignment Plus Smith–Petersen Osteotomy Versus Smith–Petersen Osteotomy-Only for Adult Spinal Deformity Negin Safari Dehnavi, Faramarz Roohollahi, Sadegh Bagherzadeh, P. Mitchell Johansen, Gersham Rainone, Natalie J. Bales, Anjali Pradhan, Mohsen Rostami, Puya Alikhani Operative Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for mortality after 3-column osteotomy Jake Carbone, Amit Ratanpal, Anthony K. Chiu, Rohan I. Suresh, Bradley Anderson, Bibhas Amatya, Amil Sahai, Brian Shear, Alexander Ruditsky, Sennay Ghenbot, Louis J. Bivona, Julio J. Jauregui, Daniel L. Cavanaugh, Eugene Y. Koh, Steven C. Ludwig European Spine Journal.2025; 34(2): 782. CrossRef
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of 3-column lumbar osteotomies with and without interbody cages for adult spinal deformity Jeffrey P. Mullin, Esteban Quiceno, Mohamed A.R Soliman, Alan H. Daniels, Justin S. Smith, Michael P. Kelly, Christopher P. Ames, Shay Bess, Douglas Burton, Bassel Diebo, Robert K. Eastlack, Richard Hostin, Khaled Kebaish, Han Jo Kim, Eric Klineberg, Virg The Spine Journal.2025; 25(7): 1508. CrossRef
The Application of 3D-Printed Microporous Laminae in Kyphosis Correction Surgery for Ankylosing Spondylitis Chao Li, Hong Li, Xiangning Meng, Beiyu Xu, Yao Zhao, Longtao Qi, Chunde Li, Yu Wang Spine.2025; 50(14): 981. CrossRef
Ponte osteotomies for treatment of spinal deformities: they are not all made equal Luigi Aurelio Nasto, Seyed Hirbod Mousavi Nasab, Angelo Sieczak, Alessandro Cattolico, Paolo Ulisse, Enrico Pola European Spine Journal.2024; 33(7): 2787. CrossRef
Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Surgical Correction of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Pratheek S. Makineni, Mohamed E. El-Abtah, Joshua R. Porto, Michael P. Steinmetz, Edward C. Benzel Neurosurgery.2024; 95(6): 1223. CrossRef
High incidence of dural tears with 3-column osteotomies: a systematic review of adult spinal deformity surgery literature for the past decade Anna Martin, Jamal Zahir, Nathan Smith, Oluwatodimu Raji, David Nelles, Dimitriy Kondrashov Spine Deformity.2024; 12(5): 1253. CrossRef
First
Prev
