Objective To determine the role of dynamic hip joint coverage in maintaining postoperative sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients following S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation.
Methods A total of 224 ASD patients who underwent S2AI fixation were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on pre-to-post (from preoperative to postoperative) changes in femoral head coverage (ΔFHC): change group (group C) and noncoverage change group (group NC). Group C was further subdivided according to FHC recovery during follow-up into rebound (group C-R) and nonrebound (group C-NR) groups. Clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of hip and spinopelvic alignment were assessed preoperatively, at the initial postoperative standing, and at the 2-year follow-up.
Results Compared to group C, patients in group NC demonstrated a higher incidence of sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications at 2-year follow-up, with a greater tendency for sagittal imbalance progression (p=0.013), a larger post-to-follow-up change in sagittal vertical axis (ΔSVA) (p=0.029), and a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (p=0.031). Although there was no significant difference in PJK incidence between group C-NR and group C-R (p=0.845), group C-NR showed a greater tendency for postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation (p=0.025), with a significantly larger ΔSVA during follow-up (p=0.002). The optimal cutoff values for predicting postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation were 3.5% for pre-to-post ΔFHC (area under the curve [AUC]=0.694) and 1.8% for post-to-follow-up ΔFHC (AUC=0.713).
Conclusion Dynamic postoperative changes in hip joint coverage, characterized by the FHC, are associated with postoperative sagittal balance maintenance. Patients with limited pre-to-post and post-to-follow-up changes in the FHC demonstrate compromised hip joint compensatory capacity, thereby increasing the risk of postoperative sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications.
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of 2 anterior fixation techniques (clival plate fixation [CPF], transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate [TARP]) versus posterior occipitocervical fixation (POCF) for basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD), under varying atlantoaxial lateral mass cage heights (4–10 mm).
Methods Seven fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput to C3, Oc–C3) were tested in the following conditions: (1) intact state; (2) BI-AAD state; (3) BI-AAD+CPF; (4) BI-AAD+TARP fixation; (5) BI-AAD+POCF. A pure 1.5 N·m moment loads to specimens in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) values at Oc–C2 were calculated and compared.
Results ROM of the C1–2 segment under the intact and BI-AAD states were as follows: 9.3°±4.6° versus 21.3°±8.3° in flexion, 4.6°±1.9° versus 9.3°±3.8° in extension, 3.6°±2.2° versus 12.0°±6.5° in lateral bending, and 68.9°±14.4° versus 76.6°±6.6° in axial rotation, respectively. Compared with BI-AAD states, all internal fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM of the Oc–C2 segment. TARP fixation exhibited larger ROM in flexion-extension. While in lateral bending and axial rotation, the ROM values for the anterior plate constructs were smaller than that of POCF, with a statistically significant difference observed between CPF and POCF. Cage height variations showed no significant impact on overall biomechanical stability.
Conclusion Anterior plate fixation techniques demonstrated superior resistance to lateral bending and rotational forces compared to posterior approaches, with clival plate fixation exhibiting optimal biomechanical stability for BI-AAD. Variations in cage height exhibited negligible impact on stability when internal fixation achieved adequate rigidity.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reducibility-Based Posterior Reduction and Fusion Strategies for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Clinical and Radiological Study Guipeng Zhao, Haotian Long, Dingyu Du, Dean Chou, Longyi Chen, Junting Hu, Hailong Feng, Qidong Liu, Jinping Liu Neurospine.2026; 23(2): 411. CrossRef
Objective Cement augmentation is widely used to enhance pedicle screw fixation, particularly in osteoporotic patients. However, its effects on adjacent segment disease (ASD) and implant failure in multilevel lumbar interbody fusion remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cement augmentation in preventing implant failure and its impact on ASD risk using finite element analysis (FEA).
Methods A FEA of L2–S1 multilevel lumbar interbody fusion was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of cement augmentation. Three models were analyzed under normal and osteoporotic conditions: type 1 (no augmentation), type 2 (upper instrumented vertebra [UIV] augmentation), and type 3 (UIV and UIV+1 augmentation). Range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), screw pull-out risk, and implant failure were assessed.
Results Cement augmentation significantly reduced screw pull-out risk, particularly in osteoporotic conditions, where type 1 exhibited a failure rate of 91.5%, while type 2 and type 3 remained below 39%. Cement augmentation did not demonstrate a substantial impact on ASD development, as ROM and IDP changes remained within a minimal range in this FEA model. However, osteoporosis was associated with a substantial increase in IDP, with a result as high as 809%. Despite its benefits, augmentation at UIV+1 increased the risk of pedicle screw breakage and vertebral body fracture, with L1 (UIV+1) lower endplate fracture rate of 82.7% in type 3, compared to 56.6% in type 2 and 52.8% in type 1.
Conclusion Cement augmentation effectively improves screw fixation and does not appear to significantly increase ASD risk based on this FEA study. Limiting cement augmentation to the UIV level in lumbar multilevel fusion may help reduce the risk of implant failure, though further clinical validation is required to confirm these biomechanical findings.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhancing Predictive Accuracy in Finite Element Analysis of Cement Augmentation: Methodological Considerations – A Commentary on “Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusio Fan Mo, Shaoqi He Neurospine.2026; 23(2): 500. CrossRef
Reply Letter: A Commentary on “Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis” Hyung-Youl Park Neurospine.2026; 23(2): 502. CrossRef
Objective To develop a pedicle screw for posterior spinal fixation using this long fiber carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) technology and evaluate its strength and radiolucency compared with titanium (Ti)-alloy screws.
Methods In this preclinical study, the shear strength, torsional strength, loosening resistance, and image evaluation of long fiber type CFRP pedicle screws and Ti-alloy screws were compared. A series of tests was conducted for future clinical-use approval.
Results The long fiber type CFRP pedicle screw (mean±standard deviation: 11,377.7±245.1 N) had superior shear strength compared to the Ti-alloy pedicle screw (10,300.3±249.7 N). The long fiber type CFRP pedicle screw (4.4±0.5 Nm) had inferior torsional strength compared to the Ti-alloy pedicle screw (22.4±0.6 Nm), although it could withstand twice the maximum load applied during surgery, suggesting that this will not be a clinical concern. In terms of loosening resistance, maximum torque values of the long fiber type CFRP pedicle screw and Ti-alloy pedicle screw were 0.99±0.08 and 0.75±0.05 Nm, respectively. The long fiber type CFRP pedicle screw was significantly more resistant to loosening than the Ti-alloy pedicle screw. Moreover, artifacts in the radiographic images were smaller than those observed for the Ti alloy. Biosafety and magnetic resonance safety tests also yielded satisfactory results, supporting approval of the long fiber CFRP pedicle screws for clinical use.
Conclusion Compared to existing Ti-alloy screws, the long fiber type CFRP pedicle screw with innovative manufacturing technology has sufficient performance for clinical use, and its use may make spinal surgery safer and more effective.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Biomechanical stability and pedicle screw loosening Chenxi Cui, Haisheng Yang Journal of Biomechanics.2026; 197: 113174. CrossRef
Objective To explore a surgical technique for completing ventral bone decompression and C1–2 plate-screw fixation in the craniocervical junction (CVJ) through nasal approach by stage I at the imaging and physical anatomy levels, and to evaluate its feasibility.
Methods Radiographic parameters of 80 patients with basilar invagination (BI) and 56 with normal CVJ anatomy were retrospectively analyzed. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were performed in 31 patients with BI. Key anatomical landmarks, screw entry points, and fixation trajectories were evaluated. Customized plate-screw constructs were designed. Finally, surgical feasibility was tested on a 3D-printed anatomical model and a cadaveric.
Results In 80 BI patients, the average distances between 4 screw insertion points were 16.04 mm, 21.10 mm, 6.83 mm, and 7.10 mm. C2 lateral mass oblique lengths were 16.81 mm (right) and 17.12 mm (left); C1 lengths were 18.71 mm (right) and 19.07 mm (left), with significant differences between C1 and C2 (p<0.001). A 28.5×14.1-mm titanium plate with 16 mm screws was successfully implanted via the nasal route in the polyether ether ketone 3D-printed BI model and the cadaveric. Radiology indicated that the screws were all in the lateral mass and the plates fit tightly.
Conclusion In BI, transnasal odontoidectomy and plate-screw fixation of C1–2 are feasible theoretically. This may enable a new alternative approach for nasal minimally invasive decompression and immobilization, following the completion of biomechanics and clinical trials.
Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures presenting with neurological deficits treated with endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (endoscopic minimally invasive surgery, EMIS) or conventional open surgery (OS).
Methods Data of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits who were treated with EMIS or OS between June 2019 and July 2021 were extracted from the electronic database. Various clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts.
Results Among the 231 patients who were followed up for more than 2 years, 107 were in the EMIS cohort and 124 were in the OS cohort. Compared with the OS cohort, the EMIS cohort had longer operative time (p<0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospital stay were significantly reduced (p<0.05). At both postoperative and final follow-up assessments, the EMIS cohort demonstrated significantly better visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes compared to the OS cohort (p<0.05). Both cohorts maintained similar correction of spinal canal erosion rate, percentage of anterior vertebral height and sagittal Cobb angle after surgery and at the last follow-up (p>0.05). According to American Spinal Injury Association classification, the 2 cohorts had similar neurological recovery at the last follow-up (p>0.05).
Conclusion In comparison to OS, EMIS treatment for AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits has shown comparable clinical efficacy while significantly reducing surgical trauma.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support Feifei Jin, Shu li, Xuemin Zhang, Wei Huang, Jing Zhou, Zhongdi Liu, Pan Hu, Yanqiu Wu, Zixiao Zhang, Lijun Hou, Xiangjun Bai, Tianbing Wang Medical Review.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective This study compared the efficacy of posterior pedicle screw fixation with 5.5-mm rods (PPSF5.5) with anterior corpectomy (AC) for metastatic cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) tumors.
Methods This retrospective analysis included patients with CTJ tumors who underwent PPSF5.5 or AC from January 2000 to December 2023. Data collected included demographics, surgical details, clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale scores for neck or back pain, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scale score, McCormick scale, Nurick grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score), radiologic results (cervical segmental Cobb angle), and surgical complications (instrumentation failure, tumor regrowth, and wound infection).
Results The AC group showed a tendency for short-level fusion. Patients in this group had tumors primarily located near C7 and generally confined to the vertebral body. AC was associated with more significant postoperative kyphotic changes in the index vertebra during follow-up than PPSF5.5. Moreover, AC was associated with a higher incidence of instrumentation failure, necessitating revision surgeries. Conversely, patients in the PPSF5.5 group tended to require revision surgery due to tumor regrowth.
Conclusion For CTJ metastatic tumors, PPSF5.5 provides superior resistance to forward bending and collapse prevention and minimizes instrumentation failure rate compared to AC. Moreover, AC may reduce the risk of tumor recurrence, but this approach is recommended only if the tumor is confined to the vertebral body and located at the upper level of the CTJ.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The efficacy of 5.5-mm diameter rods combined with cervical pedicle screws for the treatment of challenging spinal disease in cervicothoracic junction: Is it a game-changer? Younggyu Oh, Subum Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Danbi Park, Chongman Kim, Sun Woo Jang, Jin Hoon Park Medicine.2025; 104(36): e44369. CrossRef
Objective Our study aimed to compare the posterior interposition technique against the posterolateral transosseous technique in the same cadaver specimens.
Methods Computer and cadaver models of 2 fixation techniques were developed. The computer model was constructed to analyze bone volume removed during implant placement and the bony surface area available for fusion. The cadaver model included quasi-static multidirectional bending flexibility and dynamic fatigue loading. Relative motions between the sacrum and ilium were measured intact, after joint destabilization, after fixation with direct-posterior and posterolateral techniques, and after 18,500 cycles of fatigue loading. Relative positions between each implant and the sacrum and ilium were measured after fixation and fatigue loading to ascertain the quality of the bone-implant interface. The 2 techniques were randomized to the left and right sacroiliac joints of the same cadavers.
Results The posterior interposition technique removed less bone volume and facilitated a larger surface area available for bony fusion. Posterior interposition significantly reduced the nutation/counternutation motion of the sacroiliac joint (42% ± 8%) and reduced it more than the posterolateral transosseous technique (14% ± 4%). Upon fatigue loading, the posterior interposition implant maintained the bone-implant interface across all specimens, while the posterolateral transosseous implant migrated or subsided in 20%–50% of specimens.
Conclusion Posterior interposition fixation of the sacroiliac joint reduces joint motion. The amount of fixation from the posterior technique is superior and more durable than the amount of fixation achieved by the posterolateral technique.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Sacroiliac joint fixation with a posterior intra-articular implant versus a posterolateral transiliac implant: A biomechanical comparison Connor Huxman, Joshua Tandio, Douglas Beall, Sarah Mayer, Adam Rogers, Thomas P. Hedman, Jonathan A. Hyde, Usman Latif, Richard Oluwatodimu Raji, Jeremi M. Leasure North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2026; 26: 100871. CrossRef
A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis of a Novel Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device on Safety and Efficacy at 12 Months: Access Study Michael J. Dorsi, Pankaj Mehta, Chau Vu, Angel Boev, Ashley Bailey-Classen, Greg Moore, David Reece, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Steven Falowski, Jason E. Pope Healthcare.2025; 13(13): 1544. CrossRef
Optimal screw insertion trajectory for sacroiliac joint fusion surgery: An evolutionary and growth process perspective on the sacroiliac joint Daisuke Kurosawa, Kouji Sanaka, Eiichi Murakami Medical Hypotheses.2025; 202: 111730. CrossRef
Objective To investigate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score and screw loosening after dynamic pedicle screw fixation with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods, and evaluate its predictive value.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the patients who underwent dynamic pedicle screw fixation with PEEK rods from March 2017 to June 2022. Data on age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia history, long-term smoking, alcohol consumption, VBQ score, L1–4 average Hounsfield unit (HU) value, surgical fixation length, and the lowest instrumented vertebra were collected. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between VBQ score and pedicle screw loosening (PSL).
Results A total of 24 patients experienced PSL after surgery (20.5%). PSL group and non-PSL group showed statistical differences in age, number of fixed segments, fixation to the sacrum, L1–4 average HU value, and VBQ score (p < 0.05). The VBQ score in the PSL group was higher than that in the non-PSL group (3.56 ± 0.45 vs. 2.77 ± 0.31, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, VBQ score (odds ratio, 3.425; 95% confidence interval, 1.552–8.279) were identified as independent risk factors for screw loosening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for VBQ score predicting PSL was 0.819 (p < 0.05), with the optimal threshold of 3.15 (sensitivity, 83.1%; specificity, 80.5%).
Conclusion The VBQ score can independently predict postoperative screw loosening in patients undergoing lumbar dynamic pedicle screw fixation with PEEK rods, and its predictive value is comparable to HU value.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparative effectiveness of Hounsfield unit, MRI-based bone quality, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry T-score, and quantitative computed tomography-measured bone mineral density in predicting cage subsidence and screw loosening post-spinal surgery Jin Shang, Chuanbin Wang, Naiyu Li, Yaoyuan Wu, Yulan Chen, Zhongyuan Zhang, Jiangning Dong, Chao Wei, Luping Zhou, Wei Hong, Bingqian Chu International Journal of Surgery.2026; 112(2): 5014. CrossRef
Evaluation of Screw Loosening in Patients Undergoing Semi-rigid Stabilization with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Rods Nimetullah Alper Durmus, Ali Sahin, Sukru Oral, Halil Ulutabanca, Ahmet Kucuk, Rahmi Kemal Koc Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive Value of the Preoperative Screw Trajectory-to-Vertebral Body Hounsfield Unit Ratio and the Combined Model Incorporating MRI-Based Pedicle Bone Quality Score for Pedicle Screw Loosening After Pedicle Screw Fixation Jinhua Yang, Xincan Wu, Qiancheng Sun, Yunxin Su, Yuanzhen Zhang, Guoyong Yin, Jian Chen Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Mid-Term Outcomes of Screw Loosening in Lumbar Dynamic Stabilization with Polyetheretherketone Rods versus Titanium Rods: A Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Guozheng Jiang, Jiawei Song, Luchun Xu, Jianbin Guan, Zeyu Li, Ningning Feng, Ziye Qiu, Yukun Ma, Yi Qu, Yang Xiong, Yongdong Yang, Xing Yu World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123630. CrossRef
Biomechanical effects of screw loosening after lumbar PEEK rod and titanium rod fixation: a finite element analysis Guozheng Jiang, Shuyang Wang, Luchun Xu, Zeyu Li, Ningning Feng, Ziye Qiu, Yongdong Yang, Xing Yu Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A PEEK-Based Pedicle Screw System for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: An Appraisal at a Five-Year Follow Up Andrei George Anghel, Jonas Garthmann, Baraa Alkahawagi Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(12): 4252. CrossRef
Emerging MRI-based spine scoring techniques targeting bone quality to assess osteoporosis, vertebral fracture risk, other spinal degenerative diseases, and post-surgical outcomes Rahman Ud Din, Haisheng Yang La radiologia medica.2025; 130(9): 1442. CrossRef
Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis Min-Young Jo, Sung-Jae Lee, Je-Hoon An, Young-Hoon Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Hyung-Youl Park Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 763. CrossRef
Risk factors for screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Made Dwinanda Prabawa Mahardana, Tjokorda Istri Putri Mahadewi, Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(6): 1013. CrossRef
Enhancing long-term fixation in thoracolumbar injuries: From screw design to bone quality optimization Musa Ergin, Süha A Aktaş World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective This study aimed to compare the accuracy of robotic spine surgery and conventional pedicle screw fixation in lumbar degenerative disease. We evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes to demonstrate the noninferiority of robotic surgery.
Methods This study employed propensity score matching and included 3 groups: robot-assisted mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (robotic surgery, RS), c-arm guided minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (C-arm guidance, CG), and freehand open PLIF (free of guidance, FG) (54 patients each). The mean follow-up period was 2.2 years. The preoperative spine condition was considered. Accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale (GRS score) and Babu classification (Babu score). Radiological outcomes included adjacent segmental disease (ASD) and mechanical failure. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form health survey, and clinical ASD rate.
Results Accuracy was higher in the RS group (p < 0.01) than in other groups. The GRS score was lower in the CG group, whereas the Babu score was lower in the FG group compared with the RS group. No significant differences were observed in radiological and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups. Regression analysis identified preoperative facet degeneration, GRS and Babu scores as significant variables for radiological and clinical ASD. Mechanical failure was influenced by the GRS score and patients’ age.
Conclusion This study showed the superior accuracy of robotic spine surgery compared with conventional techniques. When combined with minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery is advantageous with reduced ligament and muscle damage associated with traditional open procedures.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Biomechanical stability and pedicle screw loosening Chenxi Cui, Haisheng Yang Journal of Biomechanics.2026; 197: 113174. CrossRef
L-Point Entry, Juxtapedicular, and Endplate-Parallel Trajectory (L-JET) Screw Fixation: A Novel Technique in Thoracic Spinal Tumor Surgery Seunghoon Lee, Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jungbo Sim, Woojin Kim, Ho Sung Myeong, Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chi Heon Kim Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 6. CrossRef
Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis Min-Young Jo, Sung-Jae Lee, Je-Hoon An, Young-Hoon Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Hyung-Youl Park Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 763. CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion in Pediatric Spine Surgery: An Institutional Experience and Meta-Analysis Taha Khalilullah, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Linda Tang, Shaan Bhandarkar, Meghana Bhimreddy, Arjun D. Menta, Daniel Davidar, Andrew Hersh, Carly Weber-Levine, Kelly Jiang, Patrick Kramer, Ritvik Jillala, Maria Jennings, Jawad M. Khalifeh, Tej D. Az Operative Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the March 2024 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 1. CrossRef
Commentary on “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques” Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 95. CrossRef
Hong Kyung Shin, Jin Hoon Park, Sang Ryong Jeon, Sung Woo Roh, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Yong-Jae Cho, for the Korean Spinal Deformity Society (KSDS)
Neurospine 2023;20(4):1469-1476. Published online December 31, 2023
Objective Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI.
Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted.
Results Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01).
Conclusion IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A biomechanical study comparing combined S1AI and S3AI trajectories to other pelvic fixation techniques: A finite element analysis William Sheppard, Arpan A. Patel, Colin Rhoads, Landon Reading, Theodore Rudic, Joshua Wiener, Matthew Magro, Lauren M. Boden, Thomas Olson, Jason Savage, Michael Steinmetz, Edin Nevzati, Alexander Spiessberger Clinical Biomechanics.2026; 131: 106712. CrossRef
Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality of Meta-Analyses Comparing Sacral 2 Alar–Iliac Fixation with Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Umbrella Review with Emphasis on Methodological Limitations Ali Haider Bangash, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell S. Fourman, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jaime A. Gomez, C. Rory Goodwin, Peter G. Passias, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 753. CrossRef
Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes Hanyu Qiu, Dhruvish Patel, Moriah Thompson, Piper Tingleaf, Kishore Balasubramanian, Peter G. Passias, Luis M. Tumialan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Nitin Agrawal, Ali K. Ozturk, Hakeem J. Shakir, John F. Burke, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith, Andrew Jea, Angela E. Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of Porous Pelvic Fixation Implants in Multilevel Spine Fusion Surgery John Caridi, Richard Menger, Christopher Martin, Alexander Lemons, Isador Lieberman, Jeffrey Mullin, Jonathan Sembrano, Khalid Odeh, Evalina Burger, Taylor Lawson, Christopher J. Kleck Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
S2AI and iliac screw prominence and removal for symptomatic prominence: a systematic review Rafael Garcia, Kari Odland, Paul Lender, David Polly European Spine Journal.2025; 34(4): 1398. CrossRef
S2AI vs. iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Sleiman Haddad, Riccardo Raganato, Yann Philippe Charles, Franciso Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Ahmet Alanay, Ferran Pellise, Javier Pizones European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Screw Loosening in S2 Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity Yasuhiro Nagatani, Hiroaki Nakashima, Tokumi Kanemura, Mikito Tsushima, Hiroyuki Tomita, Kazuaki Morishita, Hiroki Oyama, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yukihito Ode, Yuya Okada, Shiro Imagama Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(6): 1881. CrossRef
A biomechanical study on bilateral SAI annular fixation in the treatment of unilateral Denis Ⅱ sacral fractures Peishuai Zhao, Chengfei Peng, Honghu Lin, Wuqing Wei, Weiyi Pang, Chaoyong Bei Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111221. CrossRef
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Spinopelvic Fixation - What are the Key Items to Understand Performance? Robert Ravinsky, Stephen Lewis, Charles Fisher, David Polly Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(6): 2855. CrossRef
Low rates of pain requiring sacroiliac joint fusion after countersunk iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation Rahul Kishore Chaliparambil, Mykhaylo Krushelnytskyy, Rishi Jain, Mehul Mittal, Amr Alwakeal, Muhammad T. Hassan, Nishanth S. Sadagopan, Pavlos Texakalidis, Najib El Tecle, Nader S. Dahdaleh, Tyler Koski Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(3): 284. CrossRef
Comparative efficacy of S2-alar-iliac versus iliac screw techniques in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications Amit Saraf, Sanjeev Kumar Jain, Sonika Sharma Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(5): 847. CrossRef
What’s New in Spine Surgery Melvin D. Helgeson, Alfred J. Pisano, Donald R. Fredericks, Scott C. Wagner Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2024; 106(12): 1035. CrossRef
Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes Anouar Bourghli, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100516. CrossRef
Objective The surgical management of basilar invagination without atlantoaxial dislocation (type B basilar invagination) remains controversial. Hence, we have reported the use of posterior intra-articular C1–2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever technique versus foramen magnum decompression in treating type B basilar invagination as well as the results and surgical indications for this procedure.
Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Fifty-four patients who underwent intra-articular distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction (experimental group) and foramen magnum decompression (control group) were enrolled in this study. Distance from odontoid tip to Chamberlain’s line, clivus-canal angle, cervicomedullary angle, craniovertebral junction (CVJ) triangle area, width of subarachnoid space and syrinx were used for radiographic assessment. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) scores were used for clinical assessment.
Results All patients in the experimental group had a better reduction of basilar invagination and better relief of pressure on nerves. JOA scores and SF-12 scores also had better improvements in the experimental group postoperation. SF-12 score improvement was associated with preoperative CVJ triangle area (Pearson index, 0.515; p = 0.004), cutoff value of 2.00 cm2 indicating the surgical indication of our technique. No severe complications or infections occurred.
Conclusion Posterior intra-articular C1–2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction technique is an effective treatment for type B basilar invagination. As various factors involved, other treatment strategies should also be investigated.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Posterior Only Reduction and Fixation of The Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation Secondary to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Technical Note Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Faramarz Roohollahi, Morteza Faghih jouibari, Mohammad Jafari, Toufigh Mohaddes Javadi European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 1891. CrossRef
Hot topics and trends in adult Chiari malformation and basilar invagination: a bibliometric analysis [2005–2025] Youhai Xin, Zeyu Xie, Yanchun Guo, Zhesheng Chen, Weiwu Zheng, Wen Zhou, Zibi Xu, Weida Hong, Qinguo Huang Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A Surgical Technique Guide for C1–2 Fixation By the Cervical Spine Research Society Marc Prablek, Ashel C. Dsouza, Brian W. Su, Lee A. Tan Clinical Spine Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Additional Tonsillar Manipulation or Intra-articular Distraction on Syrinx Remission for Type B Basilar Invagination Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
C2 Vertebra: An Enigma for Young Spine/Neurosurgeons Mayank Garg, Raghavendra K. Sharma, Vikas Janu, Mohit Agrawal, Ashutosh Jha, Pushpinder Khera, Deepak K. Jha Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.2025; 86(01): 092. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Basilar Invagination Ricardo V. Botelho, Oscar L. Alves, Geraldo Sá Carneiro, Zan Chen, Onur Yaman, Jutty Parthiban, Massimiliano Visocchi, Jörg Klekamp, Atul Goel, Mehmet Zileli Spine.2025; 50(11): 751. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Basilar Invagination without Evident Atlantoaxial Instability (Type B) - A Systematic Review Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Eloy Rusafa Neto, Leon Cleres Penido Pinheiro, Osmar Jose Santos de sMoraes, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carloti, Roger Schimdt Brock Neurology India.2025; 73(3): 423. CrossRef
Analysis of Failed Atlantoaxial Reduction: Causes of Failure and Strategies for Revision Boyan Zhang, Yueqi Du, Can Zhang, Maoyang Qi, Hongfeng Meng, Tianyu Jin, Guoqing Cui, Jian Guan, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(11): 2741. CrossRef
Biomechanical Study of Atlanto-occipital Instability in Type II Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis Junhua Ye, Qinguo Huang, Qiang Zhou, Hong Li, Lin Peng, Songtao Qi, Yuntao Lu Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 1014. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the June 2023 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 413. CrossRef
Objective To summarize the vertebral artery (VA) pattern of 96 “sandwich” atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients and to describe the strategies of reducing the injury of VA during surgery.
Methods From 2009 to 2020, we retrospectively reviewed the 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography data of 96 AAD patients combined with atlas occipitalization and C2–3 fusion, which were diagnosed as “sandwich” AAD and 96 patients as control group patients who were without atlas occipitalization, C2–3 fusion and any other cervical bone deformity at our institution. The variations of each side of VA were described in 3 different parts (C0–1, C1–2, and C2–3) according to the characteristics of the 3-part pathological structures in “sandwich” subgroup.
Results One hundred ninety-two sides of VAs in every group of patients were analyzed and every VA was described separately at 3 different level regions. There were different variations in these 3 different regions: 4 variations in the upper fusion region, 5 variations in the sandwiched region, and 6 variations in the lower fusion region in sandwich AAD patients. And the rate of VA deformity in sandwich AAD patients was much higher and more types of VA variations existed.
Conclusion In “sandwich” AAD patients, deformities of vertebral arteries in craniovertebral junction are more common, and the same VA may have deformities at different levels that severely affect surgical procedures. Therefore, preoperative imaging examination of VA for “sandwich” AAD patients is vital of guiding surgeons to avoid injury of VA during surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography as a safe preoperative guide for vertebral arteries in craniovertebral junction anomalies: A cross-sectional study Nivedita Sharma, Rahul Dev, Pankaj Kandwal, Rajnish Kumar Arora, Preetham Patavardhan, Kunal Nigam, Sonal Saran Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(2): 158. CrossRef
Bilateral High-Riding Persistent First Cervical Intersegmental Arteries in a Case of Klippel-Feil Syndrome: The Technique of Vertebral Artery Mobilization for C1-C2 Reduction and Fusion for Atlanto-Axial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination: 2-Dimensional Ashutosh Kumar, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Pawan Kumar Verma, Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora, Anant Mehrotra, Awdhesh Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjay Behari Operative Neurosurgery.2025; 28(5): 724. CrossRef
Morphometric analysis of the C1-2 zygapophysial joint in atlantoaxial dislocation patients with sandwich fusion of the craniovertebral junction Cheng Zhang, Jinguo Chen, Yinglun Tian, Shilin Xue, Guodong Gao, Qiyue Gao, Zhihang Gan, Nanfang Xu, Shenglin Wang Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of variations of craniovertebral junction anatomy on safe C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric and radiologic study Derya Karatas, Ahmet Dagtekin, Saygi Uygur, Irmak Tekeli Barut, Engin Kara, Kaan Esen, Emel Avci, Mustafa Kemal Baskaya Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary: Bilateral High-Riding Persistent First Cervical Intersegmental Arteries in a Case of Klippel-Feil Syndrome: The Technique of Vertebral Artery Mobilization for C1-C2 Reduction and Fusion for Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination: 2- Xin Zhou, Huasheng Jiang, Qing Chen, Jianming Liang, Li Nie, Kai Xu, Shuizhen Chen, Haiyang Qing, Wenchao Yang Operative Neurosurgery.2025; 29(2): 319. CrossRef
Letter: The Rocker Technique for Atlantoaxial Dislocation With or Without Basilar Invagination: A Prospective Observational Study Xin Zhou Operative Neurosurgery.2025; 29(2): 321. CrossRef
Modified classification system of high-riding vertebral artery for the C2 screw placement strategy: a large-scale, cross-sectional study Yuwang Du, Keyun He, Kelin Li, Zhaojie Qin, Xiaofeng Li, Lihao Tan, Tao Kang, Hongyu Qin, Hua Jiang Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Models for Complex Pediatric Craniocervical Junction Surgery: Case Description and Systematic Literature Review David S. K. Mak, Yu Tung Lo, Mark B. W. Tan, Dinesh S. Kumar, Sharon Y. Y. Low Surgical Techniques Development.2025; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
A screw algorithm for congenital C2-3 fusion with high-riding vertebral arteries: feasibilities and clinical outcomes of five different fixation techniques Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Yinqian Wang, Cong Liang, Tao Fan Neurosurgical Review.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Whole‐Exome Sequencing Analysis Identifies Risk Genes in Atlantoaxial Dislocation Patients with Sandwich Fusion Guodong Gao, Yinglun Tian, Kan-Lin Hung, Dongwei Fan, Nanfang Xu, Shenglin Wang, George P. Patrinos Human Mutation.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical and Surgical Characteristics of Patients with Atlantoaxial Dislocation in the Setting of Sandwich Fusion Nanfang Xu, Yinglun Tian, Lihao Yue, Ming Yan, Kan-lin Hung, Xiangyu Hou, Weishi Li, Shenglin Wang Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2023; 105(10): 771. CrossRef
Overstrain on the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament during flexion in the setting of sandwich deformity at the craniovertebral junction: a finite element analysis Xiangyu Hou, Yinglun Tian, Nanfang Xu, Hui Li, Ming Yan, Shenglin Wang, Weishi Li The Spine Journal.2023; 23(11): 1721. CrossRef
Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination Lu-Ping Zhou, Chen-Hao Zhao, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Jin Shang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Fang Ma, Chong-Yu Jia, Ren-Jie Zhang, Cai-Liang Shen European Spine Journal.2023; 32(10): 3547. CrossRef
Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability: A Biomechanical Study Hang Xiao, Zhiping Huang, Panjie Xu, Junyu Lin, Qingan Zhu, Wei Ji Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 940. CrossRef
Application of C2 subfacetal screws for the management of atlantoaxial dislocation in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome characterized by a narrow C2 pedicle and high-riding vertebral artery Zhe Hou, Qiang Jian, Wayne Fan, Xingang Zhao, Yinqian Wang, Tao Fan Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective To determine the ideal Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement and trajectory using the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch as an easily identifiable and reproducible medial reference point. Selection of an ideal entry point and trajectory of C1 lateral mass screw insertion can help to minimize neurovascular injuries. While various techniques for screw insertion have been proposed in the past, they all require extensive dissection of the C1 lateral mass, which can cause profuse bleeding.
Methods Ninety-three 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructed images of C1 lateral masses in adult patients were utilized to simulate the placement of C1 lateral mass screws via 4 entry points and 2 trajectory angles referencing off of a medial reference point using Vero’s VISI 17 software. The safety during screw insertion simulation, as well as the screw length, were evaluated.
Results We found that C1 lateral mass screws could be safely placed bilaterally at 3 mm lateral to the reference point in both 0° and 15° medial screw angulation without violation of the cortex. The 15° medial angulation allowed for longer (18 mm) screws than the 0° angulation.
Conclusion We recommend starting C1 lateral mass screws 3 mm lateral to the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch at a 15° medial angulation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Determining anatomically-safe corridors for placement of lateral mass screws in the first cervical vertebra of the Emirati population – a CT study Dineshwary Suresh, Nerissa Naidoo, Rashid AlSharhan, Usama Al Bastaki, Jeyaseelan Lakshmanan, Baylis Vivek Joseph, Ivan James Prithishkumar Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Morphometric analysis of the lateral mass of atlas and its clinical significance in craniovertebral junction surgeries Noor Us Saba, Mohd Faheem, Heena Singh, Pratibha Shakya, Navneet Kumar Surgical Neurology International.2025; 16: 83. CrossRef
Feasibility of transpedicular screw placement through the posterior arch of C1: A CT study in the Emirati population Ivan James Prithishkumar, Dineshwary Suresh, Nerissa Naidoo, Rashid AlSharhan, Usama Al Bastaki, Jeyaseelan Lakshmanan, Baylis Vivek Joseph Translational Research in Anatomy.2025; 39: 100384. CrossRef
Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement using the intersection between lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch: a cadaveric study Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, K. Daniel Riew, Nantawit Sugandhavesa, Torphong Bunmaprasert European Spine Journal.2022; 31(12): 3443. CrossRef
Surgical Versus Conservative Management for Treating Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Multicenter Study Jun Jae Shin, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Jiin Kang, Ho Jin Lee, Tae Woo Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Sang-Woo Kim, Yoon Ha Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 1013. CrossRef
Single position lateral fusion reduces the need for a secondary surgery and robotic guidance allows for potentially higher accuracy of screw placement. We expand the role of robotics with a simultaneous workflow where 2 surgeons can work in single position surgery and discuss the technical feasibility of placement of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws in the lateral position. A 70-year-old male presented with chronic back pain and bilateral leg pain with the left side worse than the right. He subsequently underwent an L3–S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with a minimally invasive L3-ilium robotic posterior spinal fixation simultaneously in single lateral position with S2AI screws. The software planning requisite of robotics allowed for a preoperative plan where lumbar cortical screws were used to line up with bilateral S2AI screws. Intraoperatively, the OLIF was performed anterior to the patient which allowed for a second surgeon to perform the posterior stage of screw placement simultaneously in overlapping fashion during OLIF exposure. Once all screws were placed, the OLIF discectomy and cage placement were completed. As the OLIF incision is closed, rodding proceeds posteriorly with subsequent closure simultaneously as well. Operative time from skin incision to skin closure was 3 hours and 47 minutes. We present here a novel technical report on the recommended workflow of simultaneous robotic single position surgery OLIF and demonstrate the feasibility of placement of sacroiliac fixation in the lateral decubitus position. We believe this technique to be minimally invasive, effective, with the benefit of shortening valuable operating room case time.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Extended uses of robots in spine surgery beyond thoracolumbar pedicle screws: A narrative review Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Abhishek Soni, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Prabhu Krishnan Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cirugía robótica de columna vertebral: nota técnica y análisis descriptivo de los primeros 40 casos Víctor Rodríguez-Domínguez, Jorge Bedia Cadelo, Javier Giner García, María Luisa Gandía González, Catalina Vivancos Sánchez, Alberto Isla Guerrero Neurocirugía.2025; 36(3): 169. CrossRef
Robotic spine surgery: Technical note and descriptive analysis of the first 40 cases Víctor Rodríguez-Domínguez, Jorge Bedia Cadelo, Javier Giner García, María Luisa Gandía González, Catalina Vivancos Sánchez, Alberto Isla Guerrero Neurocirugía (English Edition).2025; 36(3): 169. CrossRef
Single-Position vs Dual-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion With ALIF or OLIF: A Systematic Review Rajko S. Vucicevic, Justin Castonguay, Mohammed A. Munim, Kevin C. Jacob, Sayyida Hasan, Ilyass Majji, Alexander J. Butler, Madhav R. Patel, Andrew P. Collins, Grant Park, Justin Walsh, Alexander Parsons, Kern Singh, Matthew W. Colman Contemporary Spine Surgery.2025; 26(3): 1. CrossRef
Evolution of Robotic Spine Surgery Technologies Martin H. Pham, Nolan J. Brown Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S75. CrossRef
A Prospective Study of 3D Navigation-Guided Single-Position OLIF with Posterior Percutaneous Fixation Bharat Rajendraprasad Dave, Mrugank Narvekar, Ajay Krishnan, Devanand Degulmadi, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Mirant Bharat Dave Indian Spine Journal.2025; 8(2): 138. CrossRef
Robot-assisted vs conventional lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes Carlos M Ardila, Santiago Ángel-Estrada, Daniel González-Arroyave World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion James M. Mok, Craig Forsthoefel, Roberto Leonardo Diaz, Ye Lin, Farid Amirouche Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(5): 1524. CrossRef
Single position L5-S1 lateral ALIF with simultaneous robotic posterior fixation is safe and improves regional alignment and lordosis distribution index Nicholas S. Hernandez, L. Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham European Spine Journal.2024; 33(9): 3583. CrossRef
Spinal Robotics in Single-Position Lateral Surgery: A Narrative Review of Key Concepts and Considerations Nicholas S. Hernandez, Zach Pennington, Saarang Patel, Nolan J. Brown, Abigail Broughton, Martin H. Pham World Neurosurgery.2024; 190: 56. CrossRef
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present Anthony Xi Jie Wong, Derek Haowen Tang, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh Medicina.2024; 60(3): 378. CrossRef
Feasibility and safety report on robotic assistance for cervical pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study Seungjun Ryu, Byeong-Jin Ha, Sunjin Yoon, Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Keung-Nyun Kim, Seong Yi Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary on “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques” Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 95. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of navigation robot-assisted versus conventional oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A retrospective study Min Tong, Siping Zhang, Wenhao Zhang, Limin Mou, Zhenyu Dong, Rong Wang, Shida Li, Yifei Huang Medicine.2024; 103(32): e39261. CrossRef
Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol Joonsoo Lim, Jangyeob Lim, Asfandyar Khan, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sejin Choi, Tae-Shin Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Sangwook T. Yoon, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws Pratyush Shahi, Omri Maayan, Daniel Shinn, Sidhant Dalal, Junho Song, Kasra Araghi, Dimitra Melissaridou, Avani Vaishnav, Karim Shafi, Yuri Pompeu, Evan Sheha, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz A. Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 577. CrossRef
Commentary on “Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Chang Il Ju Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 550. CrossRef
Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Tuberculosis: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparative Study Jinyue He, Jiezhong Deng, Yusheng Yang, Tingting Zheng, Fei Luo, Jianzhong Xu, Zehua Zhang Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1306. CrossRef
Pearls and Pitfalls of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Comprehensive Narrative Review Hyoungmin Kim, Bong-Soon Chang, Sam Yeol Chang Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 163. CrossRef
Efficacy of Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Cohort Study Peng Cheng, Xiao-bo Zhang, Qi-ming Zhao, Hai-hong Zhang Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base J. Alex Thomas, Cristiano Menezes, Aaron J. Buckland, Kaveh Khajavi, Kimberly Ashayeri, Brett A. Braly, Brian Kwon, Ivan Cheng, Pedro Berjano European Spine Journal.2022; 31(9): 2167. CrossRef
Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study Hyung Cheol Kim, Yeong Ha Jeong, Sung Han Oh, Jong Min Lee, Chang Kyu Lee, Seong Yi, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Dong Ah Shin Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 12(1): 312. CrossRef
First
Prev
