Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

2
results for

"Iliac screw"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Iliac screw"

Original Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1469-1476.   Published online December 31, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1469-1476.   Published online December 31, 2023
Close
Objective
Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI.
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted.
Results
Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01).
Conclusion
IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A biomechanical study comparing combined S1AI and S3AI trajectories to other pelvic fixation techniques: A finite element analysis
    William Sheppard, Arpan A. Patel, Colin Rhoads, Landon Reading, Theodore Rudic, Joshua Wiener, Matthew Magro, Lauren M. Boden, Thomas Olson, Jason Savage, Michael Steinmetz, Edin Nevzati, Alexander Spiessberger
    Clinical Biomechanics.2026; 131: 106712.     CrossRef
  • Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality of Meta-Analyses Comparing Sacral 2 Alar–Iliac Fixation with Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Umbrella Review with Emphasis on Methodological Limitations
    Ali Haider Bangash, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell S. Fourman, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jaime A. Gomez, C. Rory Goodwin, Peter G. Passias, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 753.     CrossRef
  • Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes
    Hanyu Qiu, Dhruvish Patel, Moriah Thompson, Piper Tingleaf, Kishore Balasubramanian, Peter G. Passias, Luis M. Tumialan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Nitin Agrawal, Ali K. Ozturk, Hakeem J. Shakir, John F. Burke, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith, Andrew Jea, Angela E.
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Performance of Porous Pelvic Fixation Implants in Multilevel Spine Fusion Surgery
    John Caridi, Richard Menger, Christopher Martin, Alexander Lemons, Isador Lieberman, Jeffrey Mullin, Jonathan Sembrano, Khalid Odeh, Evalina Burger, Taylor Lawson, Christopher J. Kleck
    Spine Open.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • S2AI and iliac screw prominence and removal for symptomatic prominence: a systematic review
    Rafael Garcia, Kari Odland, Paul Lender, David Polly
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(4): 1398.     CrossRef
  • S2AI vs. iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Sleiman Haddad, Riccardo Raganato, Yann Philippe Charles, Franciso Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Ahmet Alanay, Ferran Pellise, Javier Pizones
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes Associated with Screw Loosening in S2 Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Yasuhiro Nagatani, Hiroaki Nakashima, Tokumi Kanemura, Mikito Tsushima, Hiroyuki Tomita, Kazuaki Morishita, Hiroki Oyama, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yukihito Ode, Yuya Okada, Shiro Imagama
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(6): 1881.     CrossRef
  • A biomechanical study on bilateral SAI annular fixation in the treatment of unilateral Denis Ⅱ sacral fractures
    Peishuai Zhao, Chengfei Peng, Honghu Lin, Wuqing Wei, Weiyi Pang, Chaoyong Bei
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 136: 111221.     CrossRef
  • AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Spinopelvic Fixation - What are the Key Items to Understand Performance?
    Robert Ravinsky, Stephen Lewis, Charles Fisher, David Polly
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(6): 2855.     CrossRef
  • Low rates of pain requiring sacroiliac joint fusion after countersunk iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation
    Rahul Kishore Chaliparambil, Mykhaylo Krushelnytskyy, Rishi Jain, Mehul Mittal, Amr Alwakeal, Muhammad T. Hassan, Nishanth S. Sadagopan, Pavlos Texakalidis, Najib El Tecle, Nader S. Dahdaleh, Tyler Koski
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(3): 284.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of S2-alar-iliac versus iliac screw techniques in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications
    Amit Saraf, Sanjeev Kumar Jain, Sonika Sharma
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(5): 847.     CrossRef
  • What’s New in Spine Surgery
    Melvin D. Helgeson, Alfred J. Pisano, Donald R. Fredericks, Scott C. Wagner
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2024; 106(12): 1035.     CrossRef
  • Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes
    Anouar Bourghli, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 19: 100516.     CrossRef
  • 6,843 View
  • 228 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Utilization of S1 Foraminal Hooks for Augmentation of S1 Screws in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Comparative Study With Iliac Screws
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):554-561.   Published online September 30, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Utilization of S1 Foraminal Hooks for Augmentation of S1 Screws in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Comparative Study With Iliac Screws
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):554-561.   Published online September 30, 2021
Close
Objective
To compare the outcomes of S1 foraminal hooks and iliac screws regarding fusion rate at the lumbosacral junction and protective effects on S1 screws.
Methods
From January 2017 to December 2019, consecutive patients who underwent long fusions (uppermost instrumented vertebra at or above L1) to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity were enrolled. Patients were divided into S1 foraminal hook group and iliac screw group. Radiographic parameters and the incidence of pseudarthrosis and instrument failure at the lumbosacral junction were compared between the groups.
Results
Twenty-nine patients (male:female = 1:28) with a mean age of 73.6 ± 6.8 years were evaluated. Sixteen patients (55.2%) had S1 foraminal hook fixation and 13 patients (44.8%) had iliac screw fixation. Lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis did not differ between the groups preoperatively and postoperatively. The rate of L5/S1 pseudarthrosis was significantly higher in S1 foraminal hook group (5 of 16, 31.3%), compared to iliac screw group (0 of 13, 0%; p = 0.048). Instrument failure at the lumbosacral junction trended toward a higher rate in S1 foraminal hook group (6 of 16, 37.5%) than in iliac screw group (1 of 13, 7.7%), without statistical significance (p = 0.09). Proximal junctional kyphosis/failure occurred less often in S1 foraminal hook group (2 of 16, 12.5%) than in iliac screw group (3 of 13, 30.8%) without statistical significance (p = 0.36).
Conclusion
Treatment with S1 foraminal hooks achieved equivalent satisfactory sagittal correction with proportioned alignment compared to that with iliac screws. However, S1 foraminal hooks did not provide enough structural support to the lumbosacral junction in long fusions to the sacrum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Trans-sacral interbody fixation in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity: complications and fusion rates at minimum two years follow-up
    Honglei Yi, Hu Chen, Peirong Lian, Xinran Ji, Matthew E. Cunningham, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Han jo Kim, Thomas Ross, Venu M. Nemani, Hong Xia
    International Orthopaedics.2024; 48(1): 193.     CrossRef
  • Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria
    Sung Ho Do, Sungsoo Bae, Dae Jean Jo, Ho Yong Choi
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 856.     CrossRef
  • Proximal junctional kyphosis: What we didn't know, what we think we know, and what we need to know
    Austin C. Kaidi, Justin S. Smith, Han Jo Kim
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2023; 35(4): 101065.     CrossRef
  • 7,096 View
  • 108 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref