Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

18
results for

"Machine learning"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Machine learning"

Original Article

Degenerative

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Data-Driven Clustering for Risk Stratification of Unfavorable Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Development Study
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):473-486.   Published online April 30, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Data-Driven Clustering for Risk Stratification of Unfavorable Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Development Study
Neurospine. 2026;23(2):473-486.   Published online April 30, 2026
Close
Objective
Lumbar fusion surgery serves as a crucial option for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, patient heterogeneity contributes to suboptimal surgical outcomes in a substantial proportion of cases. Therefore, an accurate classification may provide a powerful tool for personalized treatment and enable the identification of individuals at increased risk for unfavorable surgical outcomes (USO). The study aimed to develop a risk stratification model for USO using cluster analysis.
Methods
Consecutive patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent lumbar fusion between April 2019 and January 2023 were enrolled. The outcome of interest was the USO, defined as failure to achieve a minimal clinically important difference in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary score, with the presence of complications. Three machine learning algorithms were employed to identify risk factors associated with USO. Based on these risk factors, we conducted a data-driven clustering analysis to develop a risk stratification model. Furthermore, based on 6 machine learning models, we developed a classification classifier capable of accurately identifying the risk cluster of individual patients.
Results
A total of 662 patients were enrolled for risk stratification model, 219 patients were classified as having an USO. Six features were identified as key prognostic predictors, including frailty, depression, PI–LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) match, surgical levels, functional independence measure, and the relative functional cross-sectional area. The K-prototypes clustering algorithm successfully identified 3 distinct clusters. Furthermore, we developed a classification classifier, in which LightGBM (light gradient boosting machine) demonstrated the highest predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.814–0.974; area under the precision-recall curve, 0.927; 95% CI, 0.769–0.969).
Conclusion
Based on data-driven clustering analysis, we developed a risk stratification model for predicting USO following lumbar fusion surgery, which demonstrated high predictive accuracy. Further studies in larger and more diverse cohorts are warranted to validate the clinical applicability of clustering analysis in USO risk stratification.
  • 1,316 View
  • 30 Download

Review Article

Artificial Intelligence

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Ever-Evolving Regulatory Landscape Concerning Development and Clinical Application of Machine Intelligence: Practical Consequences for Spine Artificial Intelligence Research
Neurospine. 2025;22(1):134-143.   Published online March 31, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Ever-Evolving Regulatory Landscape Concerning Development and Clinical Application of Machine Intelligence: Practical Consequences for Spine Artificial Intelligence Research
Neurospine. 2025;22(1):134-143.   Published online March 31, 2025
Close
This paper analyzes the regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence/machine learning AI/ML-enabled medical devices in the European Union (EU), the United States (US), and the Republic of Korea, with a focus on applications in spine surgery. The aim is to provide guidance for developers and researchers navigating regulatory pathways. A review of current literature, regulatory documents, and legislative frameworks was conducted. Key differences in regulatory bodies, risk classification, submission requirements, and approval pathways for AI/ML medical devices were examined in the EU, US, and Republic of Korea. The EU AI Act (2024) establishes a risk-based framework, requiring regulatory review based on device risk, with high-risk devices subject to stricter oversight. The US applies a more flexible approach, allowing multiple submission pathways and incorporating a focus on continuous learning. The Republic of Korea emphasizes possibilities of streamlined approval and with growing use of real-world data to support validation. Developers must ensure regulatory alignment early in the development process, focusing on key aspects like dataset quality, transparency, and continuous monitoring. Across all regions, the need for technical documentation, quality management systems, and bias mitigation are essential for approval. Developers are encouraged to adopt adaptable strategies to comply with evolving regulatory standards, ensuring models remain transparent, fair, and reliable. The EU’s comprehensive AI Act enforces stricter oversight, while the US and Korea offer more flexible pathways. Developers of spine surgery AI/ML devices must tailor development strategies to align with regional regulations, emphasizing transparent development, quality assurance, and postmarket monitoring to ensure approval success.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Raman Spectroscopy in Pandemic Virology: A Comprehensive Review
    Hulya Yilmaz, Anuradha Ramoji, Andreea Winterfeld, Hamideh Salehi, Aykut Ozkul, Jürgen Popp
    ACS Photonics.2026; 13(6): 1568.     CrossRef
  • Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of spinal deformities
    Chunwang Jia, Haoming Sun, Zhenhao Chen, Yubao Hou, Jiyu Li, Xiaosheng Ma, Feizhou Lyu, Jianyuan Jiang, Yu Chen, Hongli Wang
    Spine Research.2026; 2(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • Current Applications and Future Directions of Technologies Used in Adult Deformity Surgery for Personalized Alignment: A Narrative Review
    Janet Hsu, Taikhoom M. Dahodwala, Noel O. Akioyamen, Evan Mostafa, Rami Z. AbuQubo, Xiuyi Alexander Yang, Priya K. Singh, Daniel C. Berman, Rafael De la Garza Ramos, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jonathan D. Krystal, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2025; 15(10): 480.     CrossRef
  • 8,905 View
  • 627 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Original Article

Special Issue With Global Spine Journal

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):833-841.   Published online September 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models
Neurospine. 2024;21(3):833-841.   Published online September 30, 2024
Close
Objective
To develop and evaluate a technique using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. By leveraging deep learning techniques, the study might potentially lead to improved patient outcomes and clinical decision-making.
Methods
This study obtained 500 lateral radiographic cervical spine x-ray images from standard open-source dataset repositories to develop a classification model using CNNs. All the images contained diagnostic information, including normal cervical radiographic images (n=250) and fracture images of the cervical spine fracture (n=250). The model would classify whether the patient had a cervical spine fracture or not. Seventy percent of the images were training data sets used for model training, and 30% were for testing. Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME)’s graphic user interface-based programming enabled class label annotation, data preprocessing, CNNs model training, and performance evaluation.
Results
The performance evaluation of a model for detecting cervical spine fractures presents compelling results across various metrics. This model exhibits high sensitivity (recall) values of 0.886 for fractures and 0.957 for normal cases, indicating its proficiency in identifying true positives. Precision values of 0.954 for fractures and 0.893 for normal cases highlight the model’s ability to minimize false positives. With specificity values of 0.957 for fractures and 0.886 for normal cases, the model effectively identifies true negatives. The overall accuracy of 92.14% highlights its reliability in correctly classifying cases by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Conclusion
We successfully used deep learning models for computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. This approach can assist the radiologist in screening, detecting, and diagnosing cervical spine fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Multi-Context Squeeze-Excitation Framework with Explainable Attention for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection in CT Imaging
    M. Anitha, P. Tamije Selvy
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering.2026; 50(2): 1457.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • Contrastive Learning-Driven Representation and Feature Selection for Spinal Fracture Detection on CT Images
    Hasan Genç, Canan Koç, Esra Yüzgeç Özdemír, Fatíh Özyurt
    IEEE Access.2026; 14: 8047.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Application of Deep Learning for Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multicenter Evaluation of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted versus Manual Reading on Diagnostic Agreement with the Reference Standard
    Xing Cheng, Maoping Zhang, Zhenxiao Ren, Tang Tang, Xiaolin Meng, Zhong Huang, Hongwei Bran Li, Weiguo Li, Qiuchan Yan, Haixiong Chen, Jie Jia, Ce Wang, Cheng Li, Chunshan Yang, Guifeng Shi, Guohua Li, Kaixin Zeng, Wei Chen, Haoxuan Gao, Xiaobo Wang, Xin
    Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A two-stage deep learning system for cervical spine fracture diagnosis: integrating 3D segmentation and 2.5D classification on CT images
    Renyi Lu, Yuying Feng, Ruozhou Wang, Ting Song
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for identification of cervical spine fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ali Gholamrezanezhad, Mehrdad Farrokhi, Sami Almasri, Hadis Askari, Ali Askari, Seyed Arshia Mirjafarifiroozabadi, Mohammad Amin Nochian, Eashan Kosaraju
    Emergency Radiology.2026; 33(4): 889.     CrossRef
  • ShuffleLeNet architecture for spinal cord injury classification and level detection
    Vinod Biradar, Kuppala Saritha, Anusha Preetham
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Potential
    Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Arunee Promsri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Sompoom Sunpaweravong, Vit Kotheeranurak, Peem Sarasombath
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(4): 2547.     CrossRef
  • Performance and clinical implications of machine learning models for detecting cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review
    Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Sung Tan Cho, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Peem Sarasombath, Nattaphon Twinprai, Prin Twinprai, Inbo Han
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(1): 148.     CrossRef
  • Cervical vertebral body segmentation in X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging based on YOLO-UNet: Automatic segmentation approach and available tool
    Hongyan Wang, Jie Lu, Song Yang, Yin Xiao, Liangliang He, Zhi Dou, Wenxing Zhao, Liqiang Yang
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agents Versus Agentic AI: What’s the Effect in Spine Surgery?
    Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 473.     CrossRef
  • Fully automated pedicle screw manufacturer identification in plain radiograph with deep learning methods
    Rattapoom Waranusast, Panomkhawn Riyamongkol, Santi Weerakul, Nattharut Chaibhuddanugul, Artit Laoruengthana, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(9): 3940.     CrossRef
  • Cross-modality image-to-image translation from MR to synthetic 18F-FDOPA PET/MR fusion images using conditional GAN in brain cancer
    Youngbeom Seo, Heesung Yang, Eunjung Kong, Vivek Sanker, Atman Desai, Jungwon Lee, So Hee Park, You Seon Song, Ikchan Jeon
    Neuroradiology.2025; 67(10): 2727.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in orthopedic trauma: a comprehensive review
    Abdulhamit Misir
    Injury.2025; 56(8): 112570.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Spine Fracture Detection: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice
    Seonghoon Jeong, Byung-Jou Lee
    Korean Journal of Neurotrauma.2025; 21(3): 172.     CrossRef
  • Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care
    Rahul Kumar, Conor Dougherty, Kyle Sporn, Akshay Khanna, Puja Ravi, Pranay Prabhakar, Nasif Zaman
    Bioengineering.2025; 12(9): 967.     CrossRef
  • The evolution of cervical spine trauma classification: a paradigm shift from morphological description to clinical decision-making
    Xihao Huang, Yihong Zhang, Haowei Xiao, Jinlong Chen, Yu Jiang
    Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the September 2024 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 743.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models”
    Yu-Cheng Yeh, Fon-Yih Tsuang
    Neurospine.2024; 21(3): 842.     CrossRef
  • 8,741 View
  • 191 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):474-486.   Published online June 30, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):474-486.   Published online June 30, 2024
Close
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming spinal imaging and patient care through automated analysis and enhanced decision-making. This review presents a clinical task-based evaluation, highlighting the specific impact of AI techniques on different aspects of spinal imaging and patient care. We first discuss how AI can potentially improve image quality through techniques like denoising or artifact reduction. We then explore how AI enables efficient quantification of anatomical measurements, spinal curvature parameters, vertebral segmentation, and disc grading. This facilitates objective, accurate interpretation and diagnosis. AI models now reliably detect key spinal pathologies, achieving expert-level performance in tasks like identifying fractures, stenosis, infections, and tumors. Beyond diagnosis, AI also assists surgical planning via synthetic computed tomography generation, augmented reality systems, and robotic guidance. Furthermore, AI image analysis combined with clinical data enables personalized predictions to guide treatment decisions, such as forecasting spine surgery outcomes. However, challenges still need to be addressed in implementing AI clinically, including model interpretability, generalizability, and data limitations. Multicenter collaboration using large, diverse datasets is critical to advance the field further. While adoption barriers persist, AI presents a transformative opportunity to revolutionize spinal imaging workflows, empowering clinicians to translate data into actionable insights for improved patient care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Spondylolisthesis Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mohammad-Taha Pahlevan-Fallahy, Amir-Mohammad Asgari, Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Majid Chalian, Farhad Shaker, Parnian Yari, Sara Haseli
    Academic Radiology.2026; 33(3): 1034.     CrossRef
  • MRI evaluation of the lumbar spine: a survey-based assessment of protocols and practice patterns used by musculoskeletal radiologists in the United States
    Patrick Debs, Mona Dabiri, Robert D. Boutin, Stacy Smith, Thomas M. Link, Laura M. Fayad
    Skeletal Radiology.2026; 55(3): 579.     CrossRef
  • Modic changes and their role in vertebrogenic back pain: a literature review
    Jimmy Wen, Megan Kou, Ihab Abed, David Park, Zohaer Muttalib, Arsh Alam, Foad Elahi
    Skeletal Radiology.2026; 55(2): 249.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • Implications and utility of artificial intelligence in clinical spine surgical practice
    Jacob Weinberg, John Bonamer, Nicolas Kelhofer, Mohamed Ali Jawad-Makki, Ryan Zuckerbraun, Christopher Gonzalez, Rahul Ramanathan, Joon Y. Lee, Michael Spitnale, Richard Wawrose
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2026; 38(1): 101239.     CrossRef
  • CT Evaluation of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comprehensive Review with an Integrated Framework for Principle-Based Interpretation
    Szu-Hsiang Peng, Jwo-Luen Pao
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(1): 140.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning for discovery of clinical pain biomarkers following spinal cord injury
    Roxana Florea, Ki-Soo Jeong, Carl Y. Saab
    Experimental Neurology.2026; 398: 115649.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic Imaging: Current Applications, Ethical Challenges, and Future Directions – A Systematic Review
    Wilhelm Hansen, Badar Munir, Ethan Jarvis
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A scoping review of systematic reviews on artificial intelligence in orthopaedics
    Wisely Zhi-Tang Koay, Siow-Wee Chang, Raja Elina Ahmad, Tunku Kamarul
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Traitement chirurgical des hypercyphoses souples
    C. Aleman, Y.P. Charles
    EMC - Techniques chirurgicales - Orthopédie - Traumatologie.2026; 46(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spine Imaging Interpretation
    Salvatore Gitto, Patrick Omoumi, Domenico Albano, Pau Xiberta, Silvia Rossi, Aldo Rizzo, Carmelo Messina, Alessandra Splendiani, Antonio Barile, Luca Maria Sconfienza
    Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.2026; 30(03): 319.     CrossRef
  • Automated Detection of Cervical Spinal Cord Compression on MRI Using YOLO11 Deep Learning Architecture
    Qian Du, Weijun Kong, Yonghu Chang, Zhijun Xin, Xinxin Shao, Libo Feng, Jiaxiang Zhou, Yuancheng Zhang, Xinjuan Li, Guangru Cao, Rao Fu, Qingde Wa, Zhiyu Zhou
    Spine.2026; 51(9): 610.     CrossRef
  • The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Diagnosis and Surgical Planning in Orthopaedics: Current Insights and Future Directions
    Adeolu A Badejo, Michael O Kolade, Kenechukwu Igbokwe, Timilehin Olowookere, Abiodun C Adegbesan, Imri G Adefokun, Tosin Fakiyesi, Olorungbami K Anifalaje, Funbi Ayeni
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • AI-Assisted Fracture Detection in Orthopedic and Trauma Imaging: Where It Works, Where It Fails, and Principles for Safe Clinical Deployment
    Wojciech Michał Glinkowski, Paweł Kaminski, Rafał Obuchowicz
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(10): 1420.     CrossRef
  • An Explainable End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Framework for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Diagnosis from Radiography Images Using Anatomical Feature Engineering
    Sakshi Shrestha, Sittisak Saechueng, Piphatpong Wannapanon, Phusit Koedsak na waengnoi, Prawit Boonmee, Ponlawat Chophuk, Shehenaz Shaik
    Meta-Radiology.2026; : 100218.     CrossRef
  • Digital twins and multimodal artificial intelligence in spine care: a scoping review of concepts, evidence, and translational barriers
    Samer G. Salman, Rohan Phadke, Rahul Kumar, Nasif Zaman, Alireza Tavakkoli
    Spine Deformity.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Segmentation and 3D Visualization of Spinal Motion Segments from MSCT Images Using a 3D U‑Net Framework
    Antor Mahamudul Hashan, Khlebnikov Nikolai Alexandrovich, Denis Protasov
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of a Smart Orthosis in the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis—A Pilot Case Study
    Patrycja Tymińska-Wójcik, Katarzyna Zaborowska-Sapeta, Tomasz Giżewski
    Sensors.2026; 26(10): 3169.     CrossRef
  • Advancing medical imaging diagnostics using deep learning for accurate spinal disorder classification
    Ramesh Chandran, Balamurugan Rengeswaran, Lokeshkumar Ramasamy
    Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?
    Maria Caterina Evangelisti, Alida Mazzoli, Ivan Cabrilo, Giuseppe Perale
    Bioengineering.2026; 13(6): 614.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spine Neuroimaging: Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Lower Back Pain
    Danai Stefanou, Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger, Georgios Charalampopoulos, Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, Evgenia Efthymiou, Georgios Velonakis, Nikolaos Kelekis, Dimitrios K. Filippiadis
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(12): 4447.     CrossRef
  • Introduction to Evolving Concepts Related to Spinal Cord Compression
    Mouad Elganga, Raman Abbaspour, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Karlo M. Pedro, Michael G. Fehlings
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Automatic measurement of vertebral compression ratio on lumbar MR images fracture assessment based on MS-Res-AttU-Net model framework
    Jin Xue, Rao Yu, Lifei Wang, Ping Zhao
    Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From Black Box to Clinical Trust: A Conceptual Review of Explainable and Lightweight Deep Learning for Spine Disease Detection and Segmentation
    Eze, M., Ebiesuwa, O., Oyebola, A., Okesola, K., Ojo, A., Mgbeahuruike, E.
    British Journal of Computer Networking and Information Technology.2026; 9(2): 68.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine care: A scoping review of diagnostic applications
    Victoria A. Bensel, Anne Habeck, Marcda Hilaire Brunot, Eleni-James Becton, Monika Ray, Alexandria L. Brackett, Anthony J. Lisi, Rajakumar Anbazhagan
    PLOS One.2026; 21(7): e0352200.     CrossRef
  • A review of the application of novel intervertebral disc diagnostic technologies integrated with artificial intelligence in medical imaging
    Liling Zhou, Sirui Zhou, Weijian Zhu, Qi Zhou, Zhihao Xu, Gang Wu
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep learning framework for automated classification of thoracolumbar fractures using spinal CT images
    Xiao Qu, Yucheng Shu, Huazhang Zhu, Chao Zhang, Dagang Tang, Ningdao Li, Xiaoji Luo
    Health Informatics Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Analysis of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Chenlu Rao, Jinming Wang, Xiaojuan Ma, Meiyuan Hu, Jiaxin Zhang, Ying Xu, Wenjuan Zhou
    Journal of Biosciences and Medicines.2026; 14(06): 92.     CrossRef
  • Domain-Adapted Foundation Models for Single-Click Surgical Instrument Segmentation in Spinal Endoscopy
    Bong-Su Mun, Zhi Zhao, Sang-Min Park, Jiwon Park, Hyun-Jin Park, Hyung Rae Lee, Ho-Joong Kim, Jin S. Yeom
    Neurospine.2026; 23(3): 633.     CrossRef
  • DeepSeek versus ChatGPT: Multimodal artificial intelligence revolutionizing scientific discovery. From language editing to autonomous content generation—Redefining innovation in research and practice
    Mahmut Enes Kayaalp, Robert Prill, Erdem Aras Sezgin, Ting Cong, Aleksandra Królikowska, Michael T. Hirschmann
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.2025; 33(5): 1553.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing patient understanding of spine MRI reports using AI: A prospective single center study
    Sebastian Encalada, Sahil Gupta, Christine Hunt, Jason Eldrige, John Evans, Johanna Mosquera-Moscoso, Laura Furtado Pessoa de Mendonca, Sharima Kanahan-Osman, Sohail Bade, Sahil Bade, Lisbet Ivicic, Stephanie Foskey, Jason Lyles, Juan Suarez, Aaron Fisher
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2025; 4(1): 100550.     CrossRef
  • Pearls and Pitfalls of Large Language Models in Spine Surgery
    Daniel E. Herrera, Arun Movva, Kaitlyn Hurka, James G. Lyman, Rushmin Khazanchi, Mark A. Plantz, Tyler Compton, Jason Tegethoff, Parth Desai, Srikanth N. Divi, Wellington K. Hsu, Alpesh A. Patel
    Contemporary Spine Surgery.2025; 26(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: Imaging-Based Applications for Diagnosis and Surgical Techniques
    James S. MacLeod, Tyler Compton, Yianni Bakaes, Avani Chopra, Frances Akwuole, Cole Christenson, Wellington Hsu
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.2025; 18(10): 398.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating AI-powered predictive solutions for MRI in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review
    Mugahed A. Al-antari, Saied Salem, Mukhlis Raza, Ahmed S. Elbadawy, Ertan Bütün, Ahmet Arif Aydin, Murat Aydoğan, Bilal Ertuğrul, Muhammed Talo, Yeong Hyeon Gu
    Artificial Intelligence Review.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms
    Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390.     CrossRef
  • Closing the diagnostic gap: A narrative review of recent advances in functional MRI diagnostics in spinal cord injury
    Christian J. Entenmann, Katharina Kersting, Peter Vajkoczy, Anna Zdunczyk
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104283.     CrossRef
  • Can artificial intelligence in spine imaging affect current practice? Practical developments and their clinical status
    Yu-Cherng Chang, Cinthia Del Toro, Joseph P. Gjolaj, Thiago A. Braga, Ty K. Subhawong
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 23: 100621.     CrossRef
  • Wearable Devices in Scoliosis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Innovations and Challenges
    Samira Fazeli Veisari, Shahrbanoo Bidari, Kourosh Barati, Rasha Atlasi, Amin Komeili
    Bioengineering.2025; 12(7): 696.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Health Status and Clinical Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life Improvement After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Longitudinal Study
    Irene Ciancarelli, Alex Martino Cinnera, Alessandro Ricci, Marco Iosa, Antonio Cerasa, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Giovanni Morone
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(13): 4391.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agents Versus Agentic AI: What’s the Effect in Spine Surgery?
    Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
    Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 473.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine research: A multimodal perspective beyond imaging
    Kosuke Kita, Takashi Kaito
    Spine Research.2025; 1(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Cross-modality image-to-image translation from MR to synthetic 18F-FDOPA PET/MR fusion images using conditional GAN in brain cancer
    Youngbeom Seo, Heesung Yang, Eunjung Kong, Vivek Sanker, Atman Desai, Jungwon Lee, So Hee Park, You Seon Song, Ikchan Jeon
    Neuroradiology.2025; 67(10): 2727.     CrossRef
  • Fully automated pedicle screw manufacturer identification in plain radiograph with deep learning methods
    Rattapoom Waranusast, Panomkhawn Riyamongkol, Santi Weerakul, Nattharut Chaibhuddanugul, Artit Laoruengthana, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(9): 3940.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning for automatic vertebra analysis: A methodological survey of recent advances
    Zhuofan Xie, Zishan Lin, Enlong Sun, Fengyi Ding, Jie Qi, Shen Zhao
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2025; 125: 102652.     CrossRef
  • Current Landscape and Commercialization of AI Models in Musculoskeletal Imaging
    Chang Ho Kang
    Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.2025; 86(5): 624.     CrossRef
  • The future is now: How AI is reshaping spine care
    Eric J. Muelbauer, Mohammed Ali Alvi, David J. Kennedy, Michael G. Fehlings
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100825.     CrossRef
  • From complexity to clarity: A perspective on personalized spine care through genetic, psychosocial, and technological advancements
    Favour Tope Adebusoye, Rohan S. Mane, Liyana Nithya Paaramee Priyankara, Mohammed Ahmed, Shubham Gaikwad, Jovan Ilic, Yash J. Pal, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Julie L. Chan, Daniel J. Hoh, Matthew Decker, Steven G. Roth, Daryl Pinion Fields, Paul R. Krafft
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(4): 379.     CrossRef
  • TriDx: a unified GAN-CNN-GenAI framework for accurate and accessible spinal metastases diagnosis
    Bharati Ainapure, Shrikaant Kulkarni, M Chakkaravarthy
    Engineering Research Express.2025; 7(4): 045241.     CrossRef
  • Semi-automatic CAD for upright lumbar spine MRI: reproducibility, time efficiency, and workload reduction with Q-Spine
    Federico Bruno, Federica Antolini, Claudia Tamburello, Chiara Santobuono, Giulia Caldarelli, Roberto Balbi, Antonio Innocenzi, Gaspare Saltarelli, Giovanni Di Cerbo, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Mario Muselli, Francesco Arrigoni, Ernesto Di Cesare, Antonio Barile,
    Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and reliability of AI in diagnosis and robot-assisted spinal and cranial surgery: efficient outcomes and ethical worries
    Iqra Shahid, Ahmed Raza, Inshrah Qureshi, Umaima Cheema, Siraj Ul Muneer, Ayesha Sehar, Maryam Aqeel, Saleha Azeem, Ahmad Hussain, Calvin R. Wei, Samuel Mbabazi, Fabrice Kibukila, Dieudonné Kakusu, Aymar Akilimali
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(11): 7280.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Postoperative Complications in Orthopedics: A Review of Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Aviral C Sharma, Amta Azeem, Ibrahim H Omari, Ajay Premkumar
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Research: A New Frontier
    Min Cheol Chang
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(9): 915.     CrossRef
  • THE EVOLUTION OF MICROSCOPE (AEOS) EXOSCOPE IN THE WORLD OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS APPLICATION IN LUMBAR DISC HERNIATIONS SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY FROM HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE TO CURRENT PRACTICES IN ROMANIA AT THE HOSPITAL ,,PROF.DR.N.OBLU”
    Lucian Eva, Maria-Raluca Munteanu , Mădălina Duceac (Covrig) , Iulia Olaru , Constantin Marcu , Marius-Gabriel Dabija
    Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2024; 16(4): 402.     CrossRef
  • 16,855 View
  • 280 Download
  • 39 Web of Science
  • 53 Crossref

Original Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Using Machine Learning Models to Identify Factors Associated With 30-Day Readmissions After Posterior Cervical Fusions: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):620-632.   Published online May 20, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Using Machine Learning Models to Identify Factors Associated With 30-Day Readmissions After Posterior Cervical Fusions: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Neurospine. 2024;21(2):620-632.   Published online May 20, 2024
Close
Objective
Readmission rates after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) significantly impact patients and healthcare, with complication rates at 15%–25% and up to 12% 90-day readmission rates. In this study, we aim to test whether machine learning (ML) models that capture interfactorial interactions outperform traditional logistic regression (LR) in identifying readmission-associated factors.
Methods
The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database was used to identify patients who underwent PCF between 2004–2017. To determine factors associated with 30-day readmissions, 5 ML models were generated and evaluated, including a multivariate LR (MLR) model. Then, the best-performing model, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), was compared to the LACE (Length patient stay in the hospital, Acuity of admission of patient in the hospital, Comorbidity, and Emergency visit) index regarding potential cost savings from algorithm implementation.
Results
This study included 4,130 patients, 874 of which were readmitted within 30 days. When analyzed and scaled, we found that patient discharge status, comorbidities, and number of procedure codes were factors that influenced MLR, while patient discharge status, billed admission charge, and length of stay influenced the GBM model. The GBM model significantly outperformed MLR in predicting unplanned readmissions (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.846 vs. 0.829; p < 0.001), while also projecting an average cost savings of 50% more than the LACE index.
Conclusion
Five models (GBM, XGBoost [extreme gradient boosting], RF [random forest], LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator], and MLR) were evaluated, among which, the GBM model exhibited superior predictive performance, robustness, and accuracy. Factors associated with readmissions impact LR and GBM models differently, suggesting that these models can be used complementarily. When analyzing PCF procedures, the GBM model resulted in greater predictive performance and was associated with higher theoretical cost savings for readmissions associated with PCF complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Predicting Healthcare Utilization Outcomes With Artificial Intelligence: A Large Scoping Review
    Carlos Gallego-Moll, Lucía A. Carrasco-Ribelles, Marc Casajuana, Laia Maynou, Pablo Arocena, Concepción Violán, Edurne Zabaleta-del-Olmo
    Value in Health.2026; 29(1): 159.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery
    Cheng Zhang, Shanshan Liu, Jialin Shi, Xingyu Zhou, Peter Passias, Nanfang Xu, Weishi Li
    Spine Research.2025; 1(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • 6,072 View
  • 145 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Special Issue on AI & Robotics

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Whole Spine Segmentation Using Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):57-67.   Published online February 1, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Whole Spine Segmentation Using Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):57-67.   Published online February 1, 2024
Close
Objective
Virtual and augmented reality have enjoyed increased attention in spine surgery. Preoperative planning, pedicle screw placement, and surgical training are among the most studied use cases. Identifying osseous structures is a key aspect of navigating a 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction. To automate the otherwise time-consuming process of labeling vertebrae on each slice individually, we propose a fully automated pipeline that automates segmentation on computed tomography (CT) and which can form the basis for further virtual or augmented reality application and radiomic analysis.
Methods
Based on a large public dataset of annotated vertebral CT scans, we first trained a YOLOv8m (You-Only-Look-Once algorithm, Version 8 and size medium) to detect each vertebra individually. On the then cropped images, a 2D-U-Net was developed and externally validated on 2 different public datasets.
Results
Two hundred fourteen CT scans (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine) were used for model training, and 40 scans were used for external validation. Vertebra recognition achieved a mAP50 (mean average precision with Jaccard threshold of 0.5) of over 0.84, and the segmentation algorithm attained a mean Dice score of 0.75 ± 0.14 at internal, 0.77 ± 0.12 and 0.82 ± 0.14 at external validation, respectively.
Conclusion
We propose a 2-stage approach consisting of single vertebra labeling by an object detection algorithm followed by semantic segmentation. In our externally validated pilot study, we demonstrate robust performance for our object detection network in identifying individual vertebrae, as well as for our segmentation model in precisely delineating the bony structures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Enhancing lumbar disc herniation classification through region-of-interest guidance and geometric shape features
    Cong Zhang, Kunjin He, Wei Xu, Xiaoqing Gu, Zhengming Chen, Yiping Weng
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2026; 12(1): 015038.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning-Based Projection Angle Estimation for Lumbar Oblique Radiography: A Two-Stage Object Detection Approach Using Vertebral–Pedicle Ratio Analysis
    Riria Yamamoto, Kaori Tsutsumi, Takaaki Yoshimura, Hiroyuki Sugimori
    Applied Sciences.2026; 16(6): 2800.     CrossRef
  • AI applications in lumbar and lumbosacral pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of limited evidence and future directions
    Pakpoom Thintharua, Ratchaphon Prabrai, Anuyut khamsiriwatchara, Rohan Sethi, Sorayouth Chumnanvej
    Neurosurgical Review.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Vertebra-Level Completeness Analysis in Thoracolumbar Ultrasound Using a YOLO-Based Detection Framework
    Sumartini Dana, Chen Zhang, Yongping Zheng, Sai Ho Ling
    Sensors.2026; 26(7): 2101.     CrossRef
  • Segmentation and 3D Visualization of Spinal Motion Segments from MSCT Images Using a 3D U‑Net Framework
    Antor Mahamudul Hashan, Khlebnikov Nikolai Alexandrovich, Denis Protasov
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual-cooperation of spatial and local cues enhances point-supervised spinal structure segmentation
    Pei Wang, Jiansong Fan, Xiang Pan, Wei Chu
    Applied Soft Computing.2026; 202: 115993.     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review
    Liangyu Shi, Hongfei Wang, Graham Ka-Hon Shea
    JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can artificial intelligence in spine imaging affect current practice? Practical developments and their clinical status
    Yu-Cherng Chang, Cinthia Del Toro, Joseph P. Gjolaj, Thiago A. Braga, Ty K. Subhawong
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 23: 100621.     CrossRef
  • Mask prompt-guided multi-stage network for vertebrae identification
    Zhikai Zhou, Ziyue Zhang, Mingying Li, Lei Song, Youyong Kong, Jean Louis Coatrieux, Huazhong Shu
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2025; 110: 108091.     CrossRef
  • Empowering the future of spinal surgery through digital and intelligent technologies
    Chenfei Gao, Tianyu Yao, Tenghui Zhang, Wenyu Zhang, Jianxi Wang, Fazhi Zang, Huajiang Chen
    Spine Research.2025; 1(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning for automatic vertebra analysis: A methodological survey of recent advances
    Zhuofan Xie, Zishan Lin, Enlong Sun, Fengyi Ding, Jie Qi, Shen Zhao
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2025; 125: 102652.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation
    Nitzan Kenig, Javier Monton Echeverria, Aina Muntaner Vives
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7108.     CrossRef
  • 14,309 View
  • 287 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref

Special Issue on AI & Robotics

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

TomoRay: Generating Synthetic Computed Tomography of the Spine From Biplanar Radiographs
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):68-75.   Published online February 1, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
TomoRay: Generating Synthetic Computed Tomography of the Spine From Biplanar Radiographs
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):68-75.   Published online February 1, 2024
Close
Objective
Computed tomography (CT) imaging is a cornerstone in the assessment of patients with spinal trauma and in the planning of spinal interventions. However, CT studies are associated with logistical problems, acquisition costs, and radiation exposure. In this proof-of-concept study, the feasibility of generating synthetic spinal CT images using biplanar radiographs was explored. This could expand the potential applications of x-ray machines pre-, post-, and even intraoperatively.
Methods
A cohort of 209 patients who underwent spinal CT imaging from the VerSe2020 dataset was used to train the algorithm. The model was subsequently evaluated using an internal and external validation set containing 55 from the VerSe2020 dataset and a subset of 56 images from the CTSpine1K dataset, respectively. Digitally reconstructed radiographs served as input for training and evaluation of the 2-dimensional (2D)-to-3-dimentional (3D) generative adversarial model. Model performance was assessed using peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and cosine similarity (CS).
Results
At external validation, the developed model achieved a PSNR of 21.139 ± 1.018 dB (mean ± standard deviation). The SSIM and CS amounted to 0.947 ± 0.010 and 0.671 ± 0.691, respectively.
Conclusion
Generating an artificial 3D output from 2D imaging is challenging, especially for spinal imaging, where x-rays are known to deliver insufficient information frequently. Although the synthetic CT scans derived from our model do not perfectly match their ground truth CT, our proof-of-concept study warrants further exploration of the potential of this technology.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: a scoping review
    Anis Choucha, Morgane Evin, Matteo de Simone, Guillaume Dannhoff, Henry Dufour, Valentin Avinens, Kaissar Farah, Florian Saby, Stephane Fuentes
    Neurochirurgie.2026; 72(1): 101764.     CrossRef
  • TomoRay cranial: synthesis of cranial CT imaging from biplanar radiographs using a generative adversarial network
    Olivier Zanier, Seungjun Ryu, Raffaele Da Mutten, Sven Theiler, Alessandro Carretta, Giorgio Palandri, Diego Mazzatenta, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E. Staartjes
    European Radiology.2026; 36(6): 4873.     CrossRef
  • Synthetic Imaging Methods: Ready for the Neurosurgical Operating Room?
    Victor E. Staartjes, Massimo Bottini, Olivier Zanier, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra
    World Neurosurgery.2026; 206: 124740.     CrossRef
  • Enhancement and Segmentation of High Definition CT Images in Everything 6G Medical IoT Environment
    Jinlei Liu, Fuyao Yu, Rui Li, Xiaohong Lyu, Shilei Zheng
    IEEE Internet of Things Journal.2026; 13(5): 7862.     CrossRef
  • Strategies for generating synthetic computed tomography-like imaging from radiographs: A scoping review
    Daniel De Wilde, Olivier Zanier, Raffaele Da Mutten, Michael Jin, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E. Staartjes
    Medical Image Analysis.2025; 101: 103454.     CrossRef
  • Cross-modality image-to-image translation from MR to synthetic 18F-FDOPA PET/MR fusion images using conditional GAN in brain cancer
    Youngbeom Seo, Heesung Yang, Eunjung Kong, Vivek Sanker, Atman Desai, Jungwon Lee, So Hee Park, You Seon Song, Ikchan Jeon
    Neuroradiology.2025; 67(10): 2727.     CrossRef
  • Generation of synthetic tomographic images from biplanar X-ray: a narrative review of history, methods, and the state of the art
    Aron ALAKMEH, Olivier ZANIER, Massimo BOTTINI, Maria L. GANDIA-GONZALEZ, Gustav BURSTRÖM, Erik EDSTRÖM, Adrian ELMI TERANDER, Ethan SCHONFELD, Anand VEERAVAGU, Luca REGLI, Carlo SERRA, Victor E. STAARTJES
    Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the March 2024 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Automatic 3D reconstruction of vertebrae from orthogonal bi-planar radiographs
    Yuepeng Chen, Yue Gao, Xiangling Fu, Yingyin Chen, Ji Wu, Chenyi Guo, Xiaodong Li
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enabling Technologies in the Management of Cervical Spine Trauma
    Arjun K. Menta, Antony A. Fuleihan, Marvin Li, Tej D. Azad, Timothy F. Witham
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2024; 37(9): 459.     CrossRef
  • 7,122 View
  • 208 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref

Review Article

Bone Biology and Osteoporosis Special Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Computer Vision in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1112-1123.   Published online December 31, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Computer Vision in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1112-1123.   Published online December 31, 2023
Close
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are a significant health concern linked to increased morbidity, mortality, and diminished quality of life. Traditional OVF risk assessment tools like bone mineral density (BMD) only capture a fraction of the risk profile. Artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision, has revolutionized other fields of medicine through analysis of videos, histopathology slides and radiological scans. In this review, we provide an overview of computer vision algorithms and current computer vision models used in predicting OVF risk. We highlight the clinical applications, future directions and limitations of computer vision in OVF risk prediction.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Disuse Bone Loss in Fusion Constructs After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Analysis
    Hyun-Jun Jang, Dongkyu Kim, Bong-Ju Moon, Kyung-Hyun Kim, Jeong-Yoon Park, Sung-Uk Kuh, Keun-Su Kim, Dong-Kyu Chin
    Neurospine.2026; 23(1): 176.     CrossRef
  • A scoping review of systematic reviews on artificial intelligence in orthopaedics
    Wisely Zhi-Tang Koay, Siow-Wee Chang, Raja Elina Ahmad, Tunku Kamarul
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Osteoporosis: The Renascent Impact of Vertebral Fractures—A Narrative Review of Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Integrated Management
    Mu-Chieh Chi, Kao-Shang Shih, I-Hsin Chen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(13): 5033.     CrossRef
  • Trabecular texture and paraspinal muscle characteristics for prediction of first vertebral fracture: a QCT analysis from the AGES cohort
    Jana Hummel, Klaus Engelke, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Eren Yilmas, Stefan Bartenschlager, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Claus-C. Glüer, Oliver Chaudry
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Songzi Zhang, Yunhwan Lee, Yanting Liu, Yerin Yu, Inbo Han
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(9): 4979.     CrossRef
  • 7,600 View
  • 224 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref

Original Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1272-1280.   Published online December 31, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1272-1280.   Published online December 31, 2023
Close
Objective
Although adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to restore and maintain alignment, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) may occur. While existing scoring systems predict PJK, they predominantly offer a generalized 3-tier risk classification, limiting their utility for nuanced treatment decisions. This study seeks to establish a personalized risk calculator for PJK, aiming to enhance treatment planning precision.
Methods
Patient data for ASD were sourced from the Korean spinal deformity database. PJK was defined a proximal junctional angle (PJA) of ≥ 20° at the final follow-up, or an increase in PJA of ≥ 10° compared to the preoperative values. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent variables. Subsequently, 5 machine learning models were created to predict individualized PJK risk post-ASD surgery. The most efficacious model was deployed as an online and interactive calculator.
Results
From a pool of 201 patients, 49 (24.4%) exhibited PJK during the follow-up period. Through multivariable analysis, postoperative PJA, body mass index, and deformity type emerged as independent predictors for PJK. When testing machine learning models using study results and previously reported variables as hyperparameters, the random forest model exhibited the highest accuracy, reaching 83%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.76. This model has been launched as a freely accessible tool at: (https://snuspine.shinyapps.io/PJKafterASD/).
Conclusion
An online calculator, founded on the random forest model, has been developed to gauge the risk of PJK following ASD surgery. This may be a useful clinical tool for surgeons, allowing them to better predict PJK probabilities and refine subsequent therapeutic strategies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • THE INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SPINAL CARE ASSESSMENT AND SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW
    Anıl Murat Öztürk, Cemre Aydın, Onur Süer, Erhan Sesli, Ömer Akçalı, Emin Alıcı
    Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery.2026; 37(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning-based prediction of proximal junctional pathology after adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
    Shaan Patel, Shiva A. Nischal, Yi Hein Chai, Kush M. Kale, Kevin Hines, Joshua Heller, Jack Jallo, James S. Harrop, Srinivas K. Prasad
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Explainable Machine Learning Approach to Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: Machine Learning Outperforms Logistic Regression
    Bashar Zaidat, Mark Kurapatti, Jonathan S. Gal, Samuel K. Cho, Jun S. Kim
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(4): 1992.     CrossRef
  • Machine-learning models for the prediction of ideal surgical outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity
    Dongfan Wang, Qijun Wang, Peng Cui, Shuaikang Wang, Di Han, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2025; 107-B(3): 337.     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review
    Liangyu Shi, Hongfei Wang, Graham Ka-Hon Shea
    JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review
    Paolo Brigato, Gianluca Vadalà, Sergio De Salvatore, Leonardo Oggiano, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Pier Francesco Costici, Vincenzo Denaro
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104273.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine surgery
    Cheng Zhang, Shanshan Liu, Jialin Shi, Xingyu Zhou, Peter Passias, Nanfang Xu, Weishi Li
    Spine Research.2025; 1(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Novel risk factors and personalized risk calculator for predicting proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery
    Qijun Wang, Zheng Wang, Dongfan Wang, Xuan Zhao, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2025; 107-B(8): 829.     CrossRef
  • Implications of artificial intelligence
    Michael W. Fields, Nathan J. Lee, Ronald A. Lehman
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2024; 36(3): 101122.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning applications in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a narrative review
    Nader Toossi, Ozhan Jerry
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2024; 4(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of postoperative mechanical complications in ASD patients based on total sequence and proportional score of spinal sagittal plane
    Wenbin Jiang, Huagang Shi, Tao Gu, Zonglin Cai, Qinglong Li
    SLAS Technology.2024; 29(6): 100222.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Step Towards True “Precision” Medicine?: Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity
    Lara M. Höbner, Alexandra Grob, Victor E. Staartjes
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1284.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning”
    In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the December 2023 Issue
    Inbo Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1093.     CrossRef
  • 6,037 View
  • 198 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Predicting Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Operation Using a Machine Learning Based on Modified Global Alignment and Proportion Scoring With Body Mass Index and Bone Mineral Density
Neurospine. 2023;20(1):265-274.   Published online March 31, 2023
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Predicting Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Operation Using a Machine Learning Based on Modified Global Alignment and Proportion Scoring With Body Mass Index and Bone Mineral Density
Neurospine. 2023;20(1):265-274.   Published online March 31, 2023
Close
Objective
This study aimed to create an ideal machine learning model to predict mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery based on GAPB (modified global alignment and proportion scoring with body mass index and bone mineral density) factors.
Methods
Between January 2009 and December 2018, 238 consecutive patients with ASD, who received at least 4-level fusions and were followed-up for ≥ 2 years, were included in the study. The data were stratified into training (n = 167, 70%) and test (n = 71, 30%) sets and input to machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, random forest gradient boosting system, and deep neural network.
Results
Body mass index, bone mineral density, the relative pelvic version score, the relative lumbar lordosis score, and the relative sagittal alignment score of the global alignment and proportion score were significantly different in the training and test sets (p < 0.05) between the complication and no complication groups. In the training set, the area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) for logistic regression, gradient boosting, random forest, and deep neural network were 0.871 (0.817–0.925), 0.942 (0.911–0.974), 1.000 (1.000–1.000), and 0.947 (0.915–0.980), respectively, and the accuracies were 0.784 (0.722–0.847), 0.868 (0.817–0.920), 1.000 (1.000–1.000), and 0.856 (0.803–0.909), respectively. In the test set, the AUROCs were 0.785 (0.678–0.893), 0.808 (0.702–0.914), 0.810 (0.710–0.910), and 0.730 (0.610–0.850), respectively, and the accuracies were 0.732 (0.629–0.835), 0.718 (0.614–0.823), 0.732 (0.629–0.835), and 0.620 (0.507–0.733), respectively. The random forest achieved the best predictive performance on the training and test dataset.
Conclusion
This study created a comprehensive model to predict mechanical complications after ASD surgery. The best prediction accuracy was 73.2% for predicting mechanical complications after ASD surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Determining the risk factors for postoperative mechanical complication in degenerative scoliosis: a machine learning approach based on musculoskeletal metrics
    Jie Li, Zhen Tian, Yinyu Fang, Zhong He, Yanjie Xu, Hui Xu, Zezhang Zhu, Yong Qiu, Zhen Liu
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(1): 156.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a deep learning–powered system for multi-version global alignment and proportion score to predict mechanical complications after adult degenerative scoliosis surgery
    Qifeng Lan, Shanshan Liu, Cheng Zhang, Chenyi Guo, Yiming Shi, Jian He, Xingyu Zhou, Jiaheng Shang, Qiang Qi, Zhaoqing Guo, Zhuoran Sun, Siyu Zhou, Ji Wu, Nanfang Xu, Weishi Li
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(2): 375.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Technical Review of Tethering and Adjunctive Strategies
    Paritash Tahmasebpour, Pawel P. Jankowski, Jason Liang, Joshua Lin, Kyriakos D. Chatzis, Peter S. Tretiakov, Spencer Matthews, Louis Boissiere, John F. Burke, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Aaron Hockley, Peter Passias
    Operative Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Not just alignment: body shape influences adult spinal deformity biomechanics
    Elisa R. Rosanò, Abdul Hulleck, Tao Liu, Marwan El-Rich, Markus Loibl, Fabio Galbusera, Frank Kleinstück, Tamas Fekete, Daniel Haschtmann, Sarah Richner-Wunderlin, Ferran Pellisé, Ibrahim Obeid, Javier Pizones, Ahmet Alanay, Caglar Yilgor, Luigi La Barber
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning–based prediction of perioperative complications in spine surgery: a large-scale model development and validation study
    Andrea Campagner, Francesco Langella, Pablo Bellosta-López, Francesca Barile, Riccardo Cecchinato, Domenico Compagnone, Marco Damilano, Claudio Lamartina, Andrea Redaelli, Daniele Vanni, Federico Cabitza, Claudia Meroni, Pedro Berjano
    European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting postoperative mechanical complications with the ethnicity-adjusted global alignment and proportion score in degenerative scoliosis: does paraspinal muscle degeneration matter?
    Peiyu Li, Jie Li, Abdukahar Kiram, Zhen Tian, Xing Sun, Xiaodong Qin, Benlong Shi, Yong Qiu, Zhen Liu, Zezhang Zhu
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(2): 347.     CrossRef
  • Uso de inteligencia artificial para predecir complicaciones en cirugías de columna toracolumbar degenerativa: revisión sistemática
    G. Ricciardi, J.I. Cirillo Totera, R. Pons Belmonte, L. Romero Valverde, F. López Muñoz, A. Manríquez Díaz
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2025; 69(5): 446.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of 90-Day Unplanned Readmission After Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disk Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jeong In Seol, Jeong Hoon Yoo, Hyeon Gyu Sung, Hyun Ho Park, Sung Hyeon Noh
    Neurosurgery.2025; 97(4): 908.     CrossRef
  • AI and machine learning in paediatric spine deformity surgery
    Mohsin Khan, Kaustubh Ahuja, Athanasios I Tsirikos
    Bone & Joint Open.2025; 6(5): 569.     CrossRef
  • Novel risk factors and personalized risk calculator for predicting proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery
    Qijun Wang, Zheng Wang, Dongfan Wang, Xuan Zhao, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2025; 107-B(8): 829.     CrossRef
  • [Translated article] Use of artificial intelligence to predict complications in degenerative thoracolumbar spine surgery: A systematic review
    G. Ricciardi, J.I. Cirillo Totera, R. Pons Belmonte, L. Romero Valverde, F. López Muñoz, A. Manríquez Díaz
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2025; 69(5): T446.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Congenital malformations: Recent Advances
    鑫 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(09): 91.     CrossRef
  • The predictive value of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score for mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Guilherme Santos Piedade, Carlos R. Goulart, Maria Fernanda Ricieri Ferraz Franco de Souza, Marcelo Ochoa Coelho de Souza Furlan, Philippe A. Mercier, Tobias A. Mattei
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100816.     CrossRef
  • Predicting proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning models based on spinal alignment parameters
    Akihiko Hiyama, Daisuke Sakai, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masato Sato, Masahiko Watanabe
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating Computer Vision, Large Language, and Genome-Wide Association Models in a Limited Sized Patient Cohort for Pre-Operative Risk Stratification in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Ethan Schonfeld, Aaradhya Pant, Aaryan Shah, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Dhiraj Pangal, Adrian Rodrigues, Kelly Yoo, Neelan Marianayagam, Ghani Haider, Anand Veeravagu
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(3): 656.     CrossRef
  • Lower Hounsfield Units at the Planned Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery
    Tyler K. Williamson, Ezekial J. Koslosky, Jordan Lebovic, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Peter Tretiakov, Jamshaid Mir, Pooja Dave, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel G. Diebo, Heiko Koller, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage, Peter G. Passias
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2024; 37(10): E503.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Performance of a Large Language Model in the Generation of Clinical Guidelines for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery”
    Sun-Ho Lee
    Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 147.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Method for Precise Landmark Identification and Structural Assessment of Whole-Spine Radiographs
    Sung Hyun Noh, Gaeun Lee, Hyun-Jin Bae, Ju Yeon Han, Su Jeong Son, Deok Kim, Jeong Yeon Park, Seung Kyeong Choi, Pyung Goo Cho, Sang Hyun Kim, Woon Tak Yuh, Su Hun Lee, Bumsoo Park, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Yoon Ha
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(5): 481.     CrossRef
  • Research of Global Tilt and Functional Independence: Insights into Spinal Health of Older Women
    Yu-Chieh Chiu, Ping-Chiao Tsai, Ssu-Hsien Lee, Wen-Tien Wu, Tzai-Chiu Yu, Ru-Ping Lee, Ing-Ho Chen, Jen-Hung Wang, Kuang-Ting Yeh
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(5): 493.     CrossRef
  • Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database
    Woon Tak Yuh, Jinhee Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Young Rak Kim, Sum Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Young San Ko, Chi Heon Kim, Kentaro Yamada
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(6): e0305128.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning applications in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a narrative review
    Nader Toossi, Ozhan Jerry
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2024; 4(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of postoperative mechanical complications in ASD patients based on total sequence and proportional score of spinal sagittal plane
    Wenbin Jiang, Huagang Shi, Tao Gu, Zonglin Cai, Qinglong Li
    SLAS Technology.2024; 29(6): 100222.     CrossRef
  • Classification of lumbar spine disorders using large language models and MRI segmentation
    Rongpeng Dong, Xueliang Cheng, Mingyang Kang, Yang Qu
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion
    Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee
    Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1080.     CrossRef
  • Complication Rates and Utilization Trends of 3-Level Posterior Column Osteotomy Compared to Single-Level Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
    Emily S. Mills, Kevin Mertz, Ethan Faye, Jennifer A. Bell, Andy T. Ton, Jeffrey C. Wang, Ram K. Alluri, Raymond J. Hah
    Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 662.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review
    Mitsuru Yagi, Kento Yamanouchi, Naruhito Fujita, Haruki Funao, Shigeto Ebata
    Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 876.     CrossRef
  • Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention
    Byung-Jou Lee, Sung Soo Bae, Ho Young Choi, Jin Hoon Park, Seung-Jae Hyun, Dae Jean Jo, Yongjae Cho
    Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 863.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
    Chang-Hyun Lee, Dae-Jean Jo, Jae Keun Oh, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jun Seok Bae, Bong Ju Moon, Chang-Kyu Lee, Myoung Hoon Shin, Hyun Jun Jang, Moon-Soo Han, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Seung-Myung Moon
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1272.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning”
    In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • 8,493 View
  • 257 Download
  • 27 Web of Science
  • 29 Crossref

Spine and Spinal Cord Tumors DSPN-Neurospine Special Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Prediction of Discharge Status and Readmissions after Resection of Intradural Spinal Tumors
Neurospine. 2022;19(1):133-145.   Published online March 31, 2022
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Prediction of Discharge Status and Readmissions after Resection of Intradural Spinal Tumors
Neurospine. 2022;19(1):133-145.   Published online March 31, 2022
Close
Objective
Intradural spinal tumors are uncommon and while associations between clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes have been explored, there remains a paucity of literature unifying diverse predictors into an integrated risk model. To predict postresection outcomes for patients with spinal tumors.
Methods
IBM MarketScan Claims Database was queried for adult patients receiving surgery for intradural tumors between 2007 and 2016. Primary outcomes-of-interest were nonhome discharge and 90-day postdischarge readmissions. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration and postoperative complications. Risk modeling was developed using a regularized logistic regression framework (LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and validated in a withheld subset.
Results
A total of 5,060 adult patients were included. Most surgeries utilized a posterior approach (n = 5,023, 99.3%) and tumors were most commonly found in the thoracic region (n = 1,941, 38.4%), followed by the lumbar (n = 1,781, 35.2%) and cervical (n = 1,294, 25.6%) regions. Compared to models using only tumor-specific or patient-specific features, our integrated models demonstrated better discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] [nonhome discharge] = 0.786; AUC [90-day readmissions] = 0.693) and accuracy (Brier score [nonhome discharge] = 0.155; Brier score [90-day readmissions] = 0.093). Compared to those predicted to be lowest risk, patients predicted to be highest-risk for nonhome discharge required continued care 16.3 times more frequently (64.5% vs. 3.9%). Similarly, patients predicted to be at highest risk for postdischarge readmissions were readmitted 7.3 times as often as those predicted to be at lowest risk (32.6% vs. 4.4%).
Conclusion
Using a diverse set of clinical characteristics spanning tumor-, patient-, and hospitalization-derived data, we developed and validated risk models integrating diverse clinical data for predicting nonhome discharge and postdischarge readmissions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Robotic Spine Surgery Access in the Continental United States: A Cross-Sectional Ecological Analysis
    Paul G. Mastrokostas, Leonidas E. Mastrokostas, Ahmed K. Emara, Jonathan Dalton, Rajkishen Narayanan, Christopher K. Kepler, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E. Razi, Mitchell K. Ng
    Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 577.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Postoperative Discharge Status and Readmissions in Spinal Metastatic Disease Using Machine Learning Models
    Renuka Chintapalli, Philip Heesen, Atman Desai
    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.2026; 87(03): 176.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning in Spine Oncology: A Narrative Review
    Seth B. Wilson, Jacob Ward, Vikas Munjal, Chi Shing Adrian Lam, Mayur Patel, Ping Zhang, David S. Xu, Vikram B. Chakravarthy
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(1): 210.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Neurophysiological Monitoring during Intradural Spinal Tumor Surgery
    Furkan Ilhan, Sébastien Boulogne, Alexis Morgado, Corentin Dauleac, Nathalie André-Obadia, Julien Jung
    Cancers.2024; 16(12): 2192.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning-Based Online Prediction Tool for Predicting Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes Following Spinal Tumor Resections
    Mert Karabacak, Konstantinos Margetis
    Cancers.2023; 15(3): 812.     CrossRef
  • Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor
    Xiang Yin, Keyu Luo, Yufei Jin, Yaoyao Liu, Yinbo Wang, Mingyong Liu, Peng Liu
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(3): 819.     CrossRef
  • Current Applications of Machine Learning for Spinal Cord Tumors
    Konstantinos Katsos, Sarah E. Johnson, Sufyan Ibrahim, Mohamad Bydon
    Life.2023; 13(2): 520.     CrossRef
  • Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Marc Ghanem, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Archis Bhandarkar, Andrea de Giorgio, Adrian Elmi-Terander, Mohamad Bydon
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(12): 1723.     CrossRef
  • 9,467 View
  • 179 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref

Review Articles

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Emerging Technologies in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):417-427.   Published online September 30, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Emerging Technologies in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):417-427.   Published online September 30, 2021
Close
Outcomes for adult spinal deformity continue to improve as new technologies become integrated into clinical practice. Machine learning, robot-guided spinal surgery, and patientspecific rods are tools that are being used to improve preoperative planning and patient satisfaction. Machine learning can be used to predict complications, readmissions, and generate postoperative radiographs which can be shown to patients to guide discussions about surgery. Robot-guided spinal surgery is a rapidly growing field showing signs of greater accuracy in screw placement during surgery. Patient-specific rods offer improved outcomes through higher correction rates and decreased rates of rod breakage while decreasing operative time. The objective of this review is to evaluate trends in the literature about machine learning, robot-guided spinal surgery, and patient-specific rods in the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Treatment strategies and outcomes in the first reported case of severe “Reverse-Folding” spinal deformity: A 2-year follow-up case report
    Jianming Zhang, Chao Li, Beiyu Xu, Yao Zhao, Longtao Qi, Lei Yue, Chunde Li, Yu Wang
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(7): 3962.     CrossRef
  • American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator as a Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
    Justin Im, Mohamed A. R. Soliman, Alexander O. Aguirre, Esteban Quiceno, Evan Burns, Ali M. A. Khan, Cathleen C. Kuo, Rehman A. Baig, Asham Khan, Ryan M. Hess, John Pollina, Jeffrey P. Mullin
    Neurosurgery.2025; 96(2): 338.     CrossRef
  • Beyond Pedicle Screw Placement: Future Minimally Invasive Applications of Robotics in Spine Surgery
    Meghana Bhimreddy, Arjun K. Menta, Antony A. Fuleihan, A. Daniel Davidar, Patrick Kramer, Ritvik Jillala, Mustafa Najeed, Xihang Wang, Nicholas Theodore
    Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S94.     CrossRef
  • Enabling technology in adult spinal deformity
    Jordan Lebovic, Matthew S. Galetta, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Michael Goytan, Alan H. Daniels, Firoz Miyanji, Justin S. Smith, Douglas C. Burton, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis
    Spine Deformity.2025; 13(5): 1547.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in orthopedic medical education: A narrative review
    Lakshmana S. Das, Deepanjan Das, Denish Chandrakar, Prashant Bhavani, Amol Dubepuria, Sitanshu Barik
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 69: 103100.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Congenital malformations: Recent Advances
    鑫 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(09): 91.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in the context of the surgical treatment of scoliosis in adults, with an emphasis on applications, outcomes, and ethical implications: A systematic review
    Jheremy Sebastian Reyes-Barreto, María Alejandra Rodríguez-Brilla
    Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología.2025; 39: e542.     CrossRef
  • Current Applications and Future Directions of Technologies Used in Adult Deformity Surgery for Personalized Alignment: A Narrative Review
    Janet Hsu, Taikhoom M. Dahodwala, Noel O. Akioyamen, Evan Mostafa, Rami Z. AbuQubo, Xiuyi Alexander Yang, Priya K. Singh, Daniel C. Berman, Rafael De la Garza Ramos, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Jonathan D. Krystal, Ananth S. Eleswarapu, Mitchell
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2025; 15(10): 480.     CrossRef
  • Use of modern magnetic resonance imaging technology for lumbar screw planning
    Yorck Rommelspacher, Andrew Dixon, André Pascal Schulte, Stephan Tanner, Frank Schellhammer, Sabine Kling, Peter Seevinck, Marta Gironés Sangüesa, Andreas Christian Strauss
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 105874.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Lumbar Lordosis: Postoperative Upright versus Intraoperative Prone Imaging in Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Audrey Zhao, Hania Shahzad, Robert Dow, Josh Callaway, Marlisa Olea-Gallardo, Hai Le
    Journal of Orthopaedic Reports.2025; : 100851.     CrossRef
  • Mixed reality–guided vertebroplasty versus traditional fluoroscopy group in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A randomized controlled trial
    Yi Lian, Anwu Xuan, Yanchun Xie, Hailong Yu, Yongcun Wei, Zening Wang, Liangbi Xiang, Hongwen Gu
    Spine Research.2025; 1(3): 147.     CrossRef
  • Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review
    Bryce Picton, Lauren E. Stone, Jason Liang, Sean S. Solomon, Nolan J. Brown, Sophia Luzzi, Joseph A. Osorio, Martin H. Pham
    Spine Deformity.2024; 12(3): 577.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu Wang, Hao-xuan Li, Qing-san Zhu, Yu-hang Zhu
    Neurosurgical Review.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning applications in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a narrative review
    Nader Toossi, Ozhan Jerry
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2024; 4(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Utilization Trends, Cost, and Payments for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Commercial and Medicare-Insured Populations
    Andrew K. Chan, Dean Chou
    Neurosurgery.2023; 92(3): e52.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in adult spinal deformity, and the future of patient-centric outcome assessments in the era of predictive analytics
    David B. Kurland, Darryl Lau, Nora C. Kim, Christopher Ames
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2023; 35(2): 101032.     CrossRef
  • Spine Surgical Robotics: Current Status and Recent Clinical Applications
    Jiangtao Wang, Junxian Miao, Yi Zhan, Yongchao Duan, Yuanshun Wang, Dingjun Hao, Biao Wang
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1256.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Failure After Total En Bloc Spondylectomy and Salvage Surgery
    Shin Won Kwon, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Woon Tak Yuh, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang Hyun Lee, John M. Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 146.     CrossRef
  • Use of computer navigation and robotics in adult spinal deformity
    Gnel Pivazyan, Kelsey D. Cobourn, Jean-Marc Voyadzis, Faheem A. Sandhu
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2022; 34(4): 100988.     CrossRef
  • Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comprehensive Review of Current Advances and Future Directions
    Hong Jin Kim, Jae Hyuk Yang, Dong-Gune Chang, Lawrence G. Lenke, Seung Woo Suh, Yunjin Nam, Sung Cheol Park, Se-Il Suk
    Asian Spine Journal.2022; 16(5): 776.     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcome of minimal invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis
    Jun Seok Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Su Hun Lee, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song, Young Ha Kim, Chang Hwa Choi
    Medicine.2022; 101(48): e31879.     CrossRef
  • 11,257 View
  • 252 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Artificial Intelligence for Adult Spinal Deformity
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):686-694.   Published online December 31, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Artificial Intelligence for Adult Spinal Deformity
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):686-694.   Published online December 31, 2019
Close
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a complex disease that significantly affects the lives of many patients. Surgical correction has proven to be effective in achieving improvement of spinopelvic parameters as well as improving quality of life (QoL) for these patients. However, given the relatively high complication risk associated with ASD correction, it is of paramount importance to develop robust prognostic tools for predicting risk profile and outcomes. Historically, statistical models such as linear and logistic regression models were used to identify preoperative factors associated with postoperative outcomes. While these tools were useful for looking at simple associations, they represent generalizations across large populations, with little applicability to individual patients. More recently, predictive analytics utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) through machine learning for comprehensive processing of large amounts of data have become available for surgeons to implement. The use of these computational techniques has given surgeons the ability to leverage far more accurate and individualized predictive tools to better inform individual patients regarding predicted outcomes after ASD correction surgery. Applications range from predicting QoL measures to predicting the risk of major complications, hospital readmission, and reoperation rates. In addition, AI has been used to create a novel classification system for ASD patients, which will help surgeons identify distinct patient subpopulations with unique risk-benefit profiles. Overall, these tools will help surgeons tailor their clinical practice to address patients’ individual needs and create an opportunity for personalized medicine within spine surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Development and validation of a machine learning model utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database for predicting early postoperative Re-operation in lumbar microdiscectomy
    Mert Marcel Dagli, Jaskeerat Gujral, Connor A. Wathen, Yohannes Ghenbot, John D. Arena, Joshua L. Golubovsky, Hasan S. Ahmad, Elie Massaad, John Shin, Jang W. Yoon, Ali K. Ozturk, William C. Welch
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106108.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Clinical decision support, medical imaging, surgical planning, and outcome prediction
    Anirudh Dwajan, Deepak Ranjan Patro, Amber Agarwal, Mary Lalhmingmawii
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Automated quantification of the anatomic accuracy of muscle paths and its application in an image-based subject-specific modeling workflow for adult spinal deformity
    Birgitt Peeters, Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau, Lieven Moke, Ilse Jonkers, Friedl De Groote, Lennart Scheys
    Gait & Posture.2025; 119: 238.     CrossRef
  • Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review
    Paolo Brigato, Gianluca Vadalà, Sergio De Salvatore, Leonardo Oggiano, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Pier Francesco Costici, Vincenzo Denaro
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104273.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Planning for Spine Surgery
    Iyad S. Ali, Yianni Bakaes, James S. MacLeod, Tony Y. Lee, Sia Cho, Wellington K. Hsu
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.2025; 18(12): 627.     CrossRef
  • Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in ASD treatment
    Kyriakos D. Chatzis, Peter Tretiakov, Peter G. Passias
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100787.     CrossRef
  • From complexity to clarity: A perspective on personalized spine care through genetic, psychosocial, and technological advancements
    Favour Tope Adebusoye, Rohan S. Mane, Liyana Nithya Paaramee Priyankara, Mohammed Ahmed, Shubham Gaikwad, Jovan Ilic, Yash J. Pal, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Julie L. Chan, Daniel J. Hoh, Matthew Decker, Steven G. Roth, Daryl Pinion Fields, Paul R. Krafft
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2025; 16(4): 379.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery
    Justin K. Scheer, Christopher P. Ames
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2024; 35(2): 253.     CrossRef
  • Automated machine learning-based model for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery
    Feng Jiang, Xinxin Li, Lei Liu, Zhiyang Xie, Xiaotao Wu, Yuntao Wang
    BioScience Trends.2024; 18(1): 83.     CrossRef
  • The value of machine learning technology and artificial intelligence to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review
    Fatemeh Arjmandnia, Ehsan Alimohammadi
    Patient Safety in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Utilizing a comprehensive machine learning approach to identify patients at high risk for extended length of stay following spinal deformity surgery in pediatric patients with early onset scoliosis
    Michael W. Fields, Jay Zaifman, Matan S. Malka, Nathan J. Lee, Christina C. Rymond, Matthew E. Simhon, Theodore Quan, Benjamin D. Roye, Michael G. Vitale
    Spine Deformity.2024; 12(5): 1477.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances
    Sungwon Lee, Joon-Yong Jung, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Jin-Sung Kim
    Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 474.     CrossRef
  • Manejo de la deformidad espinal en el contexto de fracturas por compresión vertebral osteoporóticas
    C. Mengis, N. Plais, F. Moreno, G. Cózar, F. Tomé-Bermejo, L. Álvarez-Galovich
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2024; 68(6): 615.     CrossRef
  • [Translated article] Management of spinal deformities caused by osteoporotic vertebral fractures
    C. Mengis, N. Plais, F. Moreno, G. Cózar, F. Tomé-Bermejo, L. Álvarez-Galovich
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2024; 68(6): T615.     CrossRef
  • Pseudarthrosis following adult spinal deformity surgery may be predicted with preoperative MRI adipose tissue features: an artificial intelligence study on raw 3D imaging
    Graham W. Johnson, Hani Chanbour, Derek J. Doss, Ghassan S. Makhoul, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Artificial Intelligence Surgery.2024; 4(4): 401.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence and treatment algorithms in spine surgery
    Yann Philippe Charles, Vincent Lamas, Yves Ntilikina
    Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.2023; 109(1): 103456.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Gravity Line-Hip Axis Offset as a Substantial Risk Factor for Mechanical Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery
    Sungjae An, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jae-Koo Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurosurgery.2023; 92(5): 998.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Operation Using a Machine Learning Based on Modified Global Alignment and Proportion Scoring With Body Mass Index and Bone Mineral Density
    Sung Hyun Noh, Hye Sun Lee, Go Eun Park, Yoon Ha, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Sang Hyun Kim, Kyung Hyun Kim
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 265.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in adult spinal deformity, and the future of patient-centric outcome assessments in the era of predictive analytics
    David B. Kurland, Darryl Lau, Nora C. Kim, Christopher Ames
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2023; 35(2): 101032.     CrossRef
  • In Silico Biomarkers of Motor Function to Inform Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Treatment
    Ilse Jonkers, Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau, Bryce Adrian Killen, Dhruv Gupta, Lennart Scheys, Friedl De Groote
    Journal of Applied Biomechanics.2023; 39(5): 284.     CrossRef
  • PreOperative Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity Goals
    Jay Dalton, Ayman Mohamed, Noel Akioyamen, Frank J. Schwab, Virginie Lafage
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2023; 34(4): 527.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Surgery
    Jacob C. Wolf, Aayush Kaul, Fatima N. Anwar, Andrea M. Roca, Alexandra C. Loya, Srinath S. Medakkar, Vincent P. Federico, Gregory D. Lopez, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh
    Contemporary Spine Surgery.2023; 24(9): 1.     CrossRef
  • Predicting female pelvic tilt and lumbar angle using machine learning in case of urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction
    Doaa A. Abdel Hady, Tarek Abd El-Hafeez
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • AI-Driven Segmentation and Automated Analysis of the Whole Sagittal Spine from X-ray Images for Spinopelvic Parameter Evaluation
    Sang-Youn Song, Min-Seok Seo, Chang-Won Kim, Yun-Heung Kim, Byeong-Cheol Yoo, Hyun-Ju Choi, Sung-Hyo Seo, Sung-Wook Kang, Myung-Geun Song, Dae-Cheol Nam, Dong-Hee Kim
    Bioengineering.2023; 10(10): 1229.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence to Preoperatively Predict Proximal Junction Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Soft Tissue Imaging May Be Necessary for Accurate Models
    Graham W. Johnson, Hani Chanbour, Mir Amaan Ali, Jeffrey Chen, Tyler Metcalf, Derek Doss, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Steven G. Roth, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Spine.2023; 48(23): 1688.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning
    Chang-Hyun Lee, Dae-Jean Jo, Jae Keun Oh, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jun Seok Bae, Bong Ju Moon, Chang-Kyu Lee, Myoung Hoon Shin, Hyun Jun Jang, Moon-Soo Han, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Seung-Myung Moon
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1272.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning”
    In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Can Machine Learning Accurately Predict Postoperative Compensation for the Uninstrumented Thoracic Spine and Pelvis After Fusion From the Lower Thoracic Spine to the Sacrum?
    Nathan J. Lee, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Venkat Boddapati, Justin Mathew, Meghan Cerpa, Eric Leung, Joseph Lombardi, Lawrence G. Lenke, Ronald A. Lehman
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(4): 559.     CrossRef
  • Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery and Frailty: A Systematic Review
    Carl Laverdière, Miltiadis Georgiopoulos, Christopher P. Ames, Jason Corban, Pouyan Ahangar, Khaled Awadhi, Michael H. Weber
    Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(4): 689.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence and spine imaging: limitations, regulatory issues and future direction
    Alexander L. Hornung, Christopher M. Hornung, G. Michael Mallow, J. Nicolas Barajas, Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías, Fabio Galbusera, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Matthew Colman, Frank M. Phillips, Howard S. An, Dino Samartzis
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(8): 2007.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for trabeculectomy outcome prediction in patients with glaucoma
    Hasan Ul Banna, Ahmed Zanabli, Brian McMillan, Maria Lehmann, Sumeet Gupta, Michael Gerbo, Joel Palko
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?
    Yanting Liu, Min-Gi Lee, Jin-Sung Kim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2022; 63(4): 305.     CrossRef
  • The Last Touched Vertebra on Supine Radiographs Can Be the Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients
    Do-Hyoung Kim, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chang-Hyun Lee, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 236.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility
    Alexander L. Hornung, Christopher M. Hornung, G. Michael Mallow, J. Nicolás Barajas, Augustus Rush, Arash J. Sayari, Fabio Galbusera, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Matthew Colman, Frank M. Phillips, Howard S. An, Dino Samartzis
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(8): 2057.     CrossRef
  • Editorial: Using Motion Analysis Techniques and Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Spine to Better Understand Spinal Disorders and Evaluate Treatment Effects
    Dennis E. Anderson, Stefan Schmid, Lennart Scheys, Babak Bazrgari
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning for the Orthopaedic Surgeon
    Daniel Alsoof, Christopher L. McDonald, Eren O. Kuris, Alan H. Daniels
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2022; 104(17): 1586.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Samuel S. Rudisill, Alexander L. Hornung, J. Nicolás Barajas, Jack J. Bridge, G. Michael Mallow, Wylie Lopez, Arash J. Sayari, Philip K. Louie, Garrett K. Harada, Youping Tao, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Matthew W. Colman, Frank M. Phillips, Howard S. An, Dino Sa
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(8): 2104.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic triage in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis using a deep learning system of radiographs
    Tackeun Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Seyeon Park, Jae-Koo Lee, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chi Heon Kim, Ki-Jeong Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(1): 104.     CrossRef
  • Intelligence artificielle et algorithmes des traitements en chirurgie rachidienne
    Yann Philippe Charles, Vincent Lamas, Yves Ntilikina
    Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique.2022; 108(6): S147.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Concordance between Chuna Manual Therapy Diagnostic Methods (Palpation, X-ray, Artificial Intelligence Program) in Lumbar Spine: An Exploratory, Cross-Sectional Clinical Study
    Jin-Hyun Lee, Hyeonjun Woo, Jun-Su Jang, Joong Il Kim, Young Cheol Na, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Eunbyul Cho, Jung-Han Lee, Tae-Yong Park
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(11): 2732.     CrossRef
  • CORR Insights®: Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation
    Kornelis A. Poelstra
    Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2021; 479(2): 321.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of senile spinal diseases
    Dal-Sung Ryu, Seung-Hwan Yoon
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for adult spinal deformity: current state and future directions
    Rushikesh S. Joshi, Darryl Lau, Christopher P. Ames
    The Spine Journal.2021; 21(10): 1626.     CrossRef
  • Selection of Fusion Level for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery : Selective Fusion versus Postoperative Decompensation
    Do-Hyoung Kim, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(4): 473.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty
    Su Hun Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Geun Sung Song, Jun Seok Lee, Sang Weon Lee
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(5): 677.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Emerging Technologies in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity”
    Seung-Jae Hyun
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 428.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Characteristics and Risk Factors of Rod Fracture Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”
    Junseok Bae
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 455.     CrossRef
  • The Important Role of Paraspinal Muscle Quality for Maintaining Sagittal Balance While Walking: Commentary on “Correlation of Paraspinal Muscle Mass With Decompensation of Sagittal Adult Spinal Deformity After Setting of Fatigue Post 10-Minute Walk”
    Kyung-Hyun Kim
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 504.     CrossRef
  • Clinical, Radiographic, and Genetic Analyses in a Population-Based Cohort of Adult Spinal Deformity in the Older Population
    Jun Jae Shin, Byeongwoo Kim, Juwon Kang, Junjeong Choi, Bong Ju Moon, Dal Sung Ryu, Seung Hwan Yoon, Dong Kyu Chin, Jung-Kil Lee, Keung Nyun Kim, Yoon Ha
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 608.     CrossRef
  • Extending capabilities of artificial intelligence for decision-making and healthcare education
    Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem, IbrahimHaleem Khan, Raju Vaishya, Abhishek Vaish
    Apollo Medicine.2020; 17(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • 11,699 View
  • 257 Download
  • 48 Web of Science
  • 50 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Predictive Analytics in Spine Oncology Research: First Steps, Limitations, and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):669-677.   Published online December 31, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Predictive Analytics in Spine Oncology Research: First Steps, Limitations, and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):669-677.   Published online December 31, 2019
Close
The potential of big data analytics to improve the quality of care for patients with spine tumors is significant. At this moment, the application of big data analytics to oncology and spine surgery is at a nascent stage. As such, efforts are underway to advance data-driven oncologic care, improve patient outcomes, and guide clinical decision making. This is both relevant and critical in the practice of spine oncology as clinical decision making is often made in isolation looking at select variables deemed relevant by the physician. With rapidly evolving therapeutics in surgery, radiation, interventional radiology, and oncology, there is a need to better develop decision-making algorithms utilizing the vast data available for each patient. The challenges and limitations inherent to big data analyses are presented with an eye towards future directions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Medicine for Head and Neck Cancer: Optimizing Prescriptions and Treatment Planning
    E. Karthikeyan, S. Sivaneswari
    Biomedical Materials & Devices.2026; 4(2): 1245.     CrossRef
  • Pain Management in Cancer Patients With Artificial Intelligence: Narrative Review
    Golnar Ghane, Raoofeh Karimi, Amir Mohammad Chekeni, Mahdi Darvishi, Reza Imani, Fatemeh Zahra Vafaeinezhad, Satish Rojekar
    Scientifica.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Profiling extracellular vesicles from cerebrospinal fluid for classification of intradural spinal tumors
    Amanda Salviano-Silva, Ines Stevic, Christian Mende, Rudolph Reimer, Cecile L. Maire, Marius M. Mader, Lasse Dührsen, Katrin Lamszus, Manfred Westphal, Sven O. Eicker, Franz L. Ricklefs
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of tumor microenvironment-based molecular subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases: refining conventional scoring systems
    Bing Liang, Annan Hu, Jian Zhou, Juan Li, Jian Dong
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Instrumentation and Implant Technology for Spine Oncology: A Focus on Carbon Fiber Technologies
    Iheanyi Amadi, Jean-Luc K. Kabangu, Adip G. Bhargav, Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan
    Surgeries.2024; 5(3): 499.     CrossRef
  • The intersection of race, ethnicity, and urbanicity on treatment paradigms and clinical outcomes for non-malignant primary tumors of the spine
    Brandon Bishop, Harrison Hockenberry, Jacob Sperber, Edwin Owolo, Cesar Baeta, Mackenzie Price, Corey Neff, Carol Kruchko, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Antionette J. Charles, Camryn Sciubba, Quinn T. Ostrom, Eli Johnson, C. Rory Goodwin
    Cancer Epidemiology.2024; 93: 102657.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Spinal Metastases Surgery Risk Stratification Tools in Breast Cancer by Molecular Subtype
    Julia B. Duvall, Elie Massaad, Layla Siraj, Ali Kiapour, Ian Connolly, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Theresa Williamson, Ganesh M. Shankar, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Mitchell S. Fourman, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgery.2023; 92(1): 83.     CrossRef
  • Can We Use Artificial Intelligence Cluster Analysis to Identify Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Spine at Highest Risk of Postoperative Adverse Events?
    Mitchell S. Fourman, Layla Siraj, Julia Duvall, Duncan C. Ramsey, Rafael De La Garza Ramos, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ian Connolly, Theresa Williamson, Ganesh M. Shankar, Andrew Schoenfeld, Reza Yassari, Elie Massaad, John H. Shin
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 174: e26.     CrossRef
  • Prediction and diagnosis of vertebral tumors on the Internet of Medical Things Platform using geometric rough propagation neural network
    H. Fouad, Ahmed M. Soliman, Azza S. Hassanein, Haytham Al-Feel
    Neural Computing and Applications.2022; 34(15): 13133.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances and new discoveries in the pipeline of the treatment of primary spinal tumors and spinal metastases: a scoping review of registered clinical studies from 2000 to 2020
    Julio C Furlan, Jefferson R Wilson, Eric M Massicotte, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings
    Neuro-Oncology.2022; 24(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning–derived body composition analysis
    Elie Massaad, Christopher P. Bridge, Ali Kiapour, Mitchell S. Fourman, Julia B. Duvall, Ian D. Connolly, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ganesh M. Shankar, Katherine P. Andriole, Michael Rosenthal, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Mark H. Bilsky, John H. Shin
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(2): 263.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models
    Babak Saravi, Frank Hassel, Sara Ülkümen, Alisia Zink, Veronika Shavlokhova, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Martin Boeker, Peter Obid, Gernot Lang
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 509.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Failure After Total En Bloc Spondylectomy and Salvage Surgery
    Shin Won Kwon, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Woon Tak Yuh, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang Hyun Lee, John M. Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 146.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI
    James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Sangeetha Baskar, Xi Zhen Low, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Ee Chin Teo, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Shuxun Lin, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Bala
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Model for Grading Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on Staging CT
    James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Tricia Kuah, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Xi Zhen Low, Amanda J. L. Cheng, Sterling Ellis Eide, Han Yang Ong, Faimee Erwan Muhamat Nor, Ahmed Mohamed Alsooreti, Mona I. AlMuhaish, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Ee
    Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3219.     CrossRef
  • Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment
    Bogdan Costăchescu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Bogdan Florin Iliescu, Marius Gabriel Dabija, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Daniel Rotariu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15680.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Postoperative Mortality After Metastatic Intraspinal Neoplasm Excision: Development of a Machine-Learning Approach
    Kevin J. DiSilvestro, Ashwin Veeramani, Christopher L. McDonald, Andrew S. Zhang, Eren O. Kuris, Wesley M. Durand, Eric M. Cohen, Alan H. Daniels
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 146: e917.     CrossRef
  • Is the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score Accurate and Reliable in Predicting Vertebral Compression Fractures for Spinal Metastasis? A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis
    Chang-Hyun Lee, Jae Taek Hong, Sun-Ho Lee, Seong Yi, Moon-Jun Sohn, Sung Hwan Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy and precision of the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for predicting vertebral compression fractures after radiotherapy in spinal metastases: a meta-analysis
    Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chi Heon Kim, Sung Bae Park, Ki-Jeong Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning in spine surgery: Predictive analytics, imaging applications and next steps
    Rushikesh S. Joshi, Darryl Lau, Christopher P. Ames
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2021; 33(2): 100878.     CrossRef
  • Inclusion of Frailty Improves Predictive Modeling for Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Management of Primary and Secondary Lumbar Spine Tumors
    Shane Shahrestani, Joshua Bakhsheshian, Samantha Solaru, Andy Ton, Alexander M. Ballatori, Xiao T. Chen, Rojine Ariani, Patrick Hsieh, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C. Wang
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 153: e454.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of cement augmentation with fenestrated pedicle screws for tumor-related spinal instability
    Elie Massaad, Myron Rolle, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ali Kiapour, Ganesh M. Shankar, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgical Focus.2021; 50(5): E12.     CrossRef
  • Performance assessment of the metastatic spinal tumor frailty index using machine learning algorithms: limitations and future directions
    Elie Massaad, Natalie Williams, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Shalin S. Patel, Mitchell S. Fourman, Ali Kiapour, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Ganesh M. Shankar, John H. Shin
    Neurosurgical Focus.2021; 50(5): E5.     CrossRef
  • Utility of prediction model score: a proposed tool to standardize the performance and generalizability of clinical predictive models based on systematic review
    Jeff Ehresman, Daniel Lubelski, Zach Pennington, Bethany Hung, A. Karim Ahmed, Tej D. Azad, Kurt Lehner, James Feghali, Zorica Buser, James Harrop, Jefferson Wilson, Shekar Kurpad, Zoher Ghogawala, Daniel M. Sciubba
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2021; 34(5): 779.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Sarcopenia as a Prognostic Factor for 90-Day and Overall Mortality in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery for Metastatic Tumors: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Elie Massaad, John H Shin
    Neurosurgery.2020; 87(5): E550.     CrossRef
  • 14,747 View
  • 238 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Deep Learning in Medical Imaging
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):657-668.   Published online December 31, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Deep Learning in Medical Imaging
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):657-668.   Published online December 31, 2019
Close
The artificial neural network (ANN), one of the machine learning (ML) algorithms, inspired by the human brain system, was developed by connecting layers with artificial neurons. However, due to the low computing power and insufficient learnable data, ANN has suffered from overfitting and vanishing gradient problems for training deep networks. The advancement of computing power with graphics processing units and the availability of large data acquisition, deep neural network outperforms human or other ML capabilities in computer vision and speech recognition tasks. These potentials are recently applied to healthcare problems, including computer-aided detection/diagnosis, disease prediction, image segmentation, image generation, etc. In this review article, we will explain the history, development, and applications in medical imaging

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Artificial intelligence in diagnostic software: validation, safety, and lifecycle challenges in Europe
    Tomas Bertok, Ivana Pankuchova, Eduard Jane, Zuzana Batova, Jan Tkac
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2027; 592: 121209.     CrossRef
  • Advances and challenges in AI-assisted MRI for lumbar disc degeneration detection and classification
    Peng Zhao, Shan Zhu
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(3): 1291.     CrossRef
  • Self-supervised learning and hybrid deep models for predicting the progression of Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after cataract surgery
    Paola León-Tarife, Francisco Arnalich-Montiel, David Mingo-Botín, Fernando Díaz de María, Martha Stokking, Nerea Saenz-Madrazo, Jaime Etxebarria-Ecenarro, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Ana Boto de los Bueis, Iván González-Díaz
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.2026; 273: 109100.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of loss functions for uncertainty quantification in medical image segmentation
    Sivalal Kethavath, Vasundhara, Phaneendra K Yalavarthy
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2026; 12(1): 015033.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing and evaluating robustness of AI for brain metastasis detection and segmentation via loss functions and multi-dataset training
    Yiding Han, Piyush Pathak, Omar Awad, Abdallah S R Mohamed, Vincent Ugarte, Boran Zhou, Daniel Allen Hamstra, Alfredo Enrique Echeverria, Hasan Al Mekdash, Zaid Ali Siddiqui, Baozhou Sun
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2026; 12(1): 015039.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning–based approaches for weed detection in crops
    Hua Zhao, Yan Wang
    Frontiers in Plant Science.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Detection Models for Concrete Crack Using Deep Learning Approaches: A Review
    Yaren Aydın, Zeynep Orman, Gebrail Bekdaş
    Structural Engineering International.2026; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Review of CNN-Based Approaches for Preprocessing, Segmentation and Classification of Knee Osteoarthritis
    Sudesh Rani, Akash Rout, Priyanka Soni, Mayank Gupta, Naresh Kumar, Karan Kumar
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(3): 461.     CrossRef
  • A multi-objective whale optimization for solving combinatorial optimization problems via Hopfield neural networks
    Nurshazneem Roslan, Saratha Sathasivam
    Neural Computing and Applications.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Empowering photodynamic therapy with artificial intelligence: current trends and future directions
    Avijit Paul, Marvin Xavierselvan, David Aebisher, Tomasz Kubrak, Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher, Srivalleesha Mallidi
    Frontiers in Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CMA-MIL: A cross-magnification attention-based multiple instance learning framework for renal cell carcinoma subtyping using whole-slide images
    Rashika Bagri, Ankit Rajpal
    Computers and Electrical Engineering.2026; 135: 111204.     CrossRef
  • Evidential reasoning-enabled deep learning for reliable treatment outcome prediction in cancer therapy
    Xi Chen, Xiaoxu Deng, Zhiguo Zhou
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2026; 178: 103445.     CrossRef
  • OPTIMIZED MODEL FOR KIDNEY DISEASE CLASSIFICATION USING FINE-TUNED VGG19 VISION TRANSFORMERS AND BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION
    Kancharla Anitha, B. Basaveswara Rao
    ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Analysis of Prenatal Ultrasound for Identification of Ventriculomegaly
    Youssef Megahed, Inok Lee, Robin Ducharme, Aylin Erman, Olivier X. Miguel, Kevin Dick, Adrian D.C. Chan, Steven Hawken, Mark C. Walker, Felipe Moretti
    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.2026; 52(9): 1933.     CrossRef
  • A hybrid deep learning model for enhanced multi-class ocular disease classification using EfficientNetB0 and ResNet50
    Youssef Siyah, Khalid Minaoui, Hanae Belmajdoub, Samir Saoudi
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A review of the application of novel intervertebral disc diagnostic technologies integrated with artificial intelligence in medical imaging
    Liling Zhou, Sirui Zhou, Weijian Zhu, Qi Zhou, Zhihao Xu, Gang Wu
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Flexible logic mining model via conditional random 2 satisfiability in discrete Hopfield neural network
    Nurshazneem Roslan, Saratha Sathasivam, Nur Ezlin Zamri
    Franklin Open.2026; 16: 100678.     CrossRef
  • An Interpretable Deep Learning System for Fine-Grained Classification and Longitudinal Tracking of Neonatal Auricular Deformities
    Yihui Feng, Xujun Hu, Xiwen Zhang, Xiaobao Ma, Jialin Xie, Jianyong Chen, Yangyang Yuan
    Biology.2026; 15(13): 985.     CrossRef
  • Towards a neuro-symbolic cycle for human-centered explainability
    Alessandra Mileo
    Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Morphology classification of malaria infected red blood cells using deep learning techniques
    Fatima Abdullahi Muhammad, Rubita Sudirman, Nor Aini Zakaria, Syarifah Noor Syakiylla Sayed Daud
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2025; 99: 106869.     CrossRef
  • Residual Pix2Pix networks: streamlining PET/CT imaging process by eliminating CT energy conversion
    S Ghanbari, A Sadremomtaz
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2025; 11(1): 015037.     CrossRef
  • Strategies for generating synthetic computed tomography-like imaging from radiographs: A scoping review
    Daniel De Wilde, Olivier Zanier, Raffaele Da Mutten, Michael Jin, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E. Staartjes
    Medical Image Analysis.2025; 101: 103454.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in oncourology: integrated deep learning technologies in the tasks of segmentation of three-dimensional images of kidney tumors
    Valentin G. Nikitaev, Dmitry Yu. Pushkar, Vsevolod B. Matveev, Alexander N. Pronichev, Oleg V. Nagornov, Alexander I. Otchenashenko, Artem I. Kleyman
    Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika.2025; (11): 45.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence algorithms for object detection and recognition in video and images
    Prabakar Dakshinamoorthy, Gnanajeyaraman Rajaram, Shruti garg, Prabhu Murugan, A. Manimaran, Ramesh Sundar
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2025; 84(29): 36089.     CrossRef
  • The history, current state and future possibilities of the non-invasive brain computer interfaces
    Frederico Caiado, Arkadiy Ukolov
    Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices.2025; 25: 100353.     CrossRef
  • Value of enhanced CT machine learning models combined with clinicoradiological characteristics in predicting lymphatic tissue metastasis in colon cancer
    Xinyi Li, Ziwei Tang, Yong Liu, Yanni Du, Yuxue Xing, Zixin Zhang, Ruming Xie
    Die Radiologie.2025; 65(S1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating auto‐contouring accuracy in reduced CT dose images for radiopharmaceutical therapies: Denoising and evaluation of 177Lu DOTATATE therapy dataset
    Hung‐Te Yang, Kuan‐Yin Ko, Ching‐Ching Yang
    Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Threats to medical diagnosis systems: analyzing targeted adversarial attacks in deep learning-based COVID-19 diagnosis
    Sheikh Burhan Ul Haque, Aasim Zafar, Sheikh Riyaz Ul Haq, Sheikh Moeen Ul Haque, Mohassin Ahmad, Khushnaseeb Roshan
    Soft Computing.2025; 29(3): 1879.     CrossRef
  • Improved 2-D Chest CT Image Enhancement With Multi-Level VGG Loss
    Ayush Chaturvedi, Ritvik Prabhu, Mukund Yadav, Wu-Chun Feng, Guohua Cao
    IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.2025; 9(3): 304.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning-Based Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Models for Parkinson's Disease Prediction Using DaTscan Image
    Janmejay Pant, Hitesh Kumar Pant, Vinay Kumar Pant, Vikas Bhatt, Devendra Singh, Kapil Joshi
    Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal.2025; 18(December S): 161.     CrossRef
  • Explaining Fuhrman Grading using Deep Convolutional-Driven Features of Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Rashika Bagri, Ankit Rajpal
    Procedia Computer Science.2025; 258: 2140.     CrossRef
  • Nanomaterial-Based Molecular Imaging in Cancer: Advances in Simulation and AI Integration
    James C. L. Chow
    Biomolecules.2025; 15(3): 444.     CrossRef
  • A Computer-Aided Approach to Canine Hip Dysplasia Assessment: Measuring Femoral Head–Acetabulum Distance with Deep Learning
    Pedro Franco-Gonçalo, Pedro Leite, Sofia Alves-Pimenta, Bruno Colaço, Lio Gonçalves, Vítor Filipe, Fintan McEvoy, Manuel Ferreira, Mário Ginja
    Applied Sciences.2025; 15(9): 5087.     CrossRef
  • Transforming Healthcare in India: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Regulatory Frameworks for Sustainable Growth
    Arjun Ghosh, Ankit Saini, Himanshu Barad
    World Medical & Health Policy.2025; 17(3): 475.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing breast cancer diagnosis with convolutional autoencoders: Enhanced performance through modified loss functions
    ArunaDevi Karuppasamy, Hamza zidoum, Majda Said Sultan Al-Rashdi, Maiya Al-Bahri
    Intelligence-Based Medicine.2025; 11: 100248.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in oncourology: integrated deep learning technologies in the tasks of segmentation of three-dimensional images of kidney tumors
    V. G. Nikitaev, D. Yu. Pushkar, V. B. Matveev, A. N. Pronichev, O. V. Nagornov, A. I. Otchenashenko, A. I. Kleyman
    Measurement Techniques.2025; 67(11): 848.     CrossRef
  • DeepSafe:Two-level deep learning approach for disaster victims detection
    Amir Azizi, Panayiotis Charalambous, Yiorgos Chrysanthou
    Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware.2025; 7(2): 139.     CrossRef
  • Using pathology images and artificial intelligence to identify bacterial infections and their types
    Xinggong Liang, Gongji Wang, Zhengyang Zhu, Wanqing Zhang, Yuqian Li, Jianliang Luo, Han Wang, Shuo Wu, Run Chen, Mingyan Deng, Hao Wu, Chen Shen, Gengwang Hu, Kai Zhang, Qinru Sun, Zhenyuan Wang
    Journal of Microbiological Methods.2025; 232-234: 107131.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Neural Networks and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Predicting Viscosity of Small Organic Molecules
    Tianle Yue, Danh Nguyen, Vikas Varshney, Ying Li
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.2025; 129(18): 4501.     CrossRef
  • Automated Caries Detection Under Dental Restorations and Braces Using Deep Learning
    Yi-Cheng Mao, Yuan-Jin Lin, Jen-Peng Hu, Zi-Yu Liu, Shih-Lun Chen, Chiung-An Chen, Tsung-Yi Chen, Kuo-Chen Li, Liang-Hung Wang, Wei-Chen Tu, Patricia Angela R. Abu
    Bioengineering.2025; 12(5): 533.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning advances in breast medical imaging with a focus on clinical readiness and radiologists’ perspective
    Oladosu Oyebisi Oladimeji, Abdullah Al-Zubaer Imran, Xiaoqin Wang, Saritha Unnikrishnan
    Image and Vision Computing.2025; 161: 105601.     CrossRef
  • Advancing respiratory disease diagnosis: A deep learning and vision transformer-based approach with a novel X-ray dataset
    Amer Alghadhban, Rabie A. Ramadan, Meshari Alazmi
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2025; 194: 110501.     CrossRef
  • LSE-Net: Integrated Segmentation and Ensemble Deep Learning for Enhanced Lung Disease Classification
    Bhavan Kumar Basavaraju, Mohammad Masum
    Electronics.2025; 14(12): 2407.     CrossRef
  • Information Geometric Approaches for Patient-Specific Test-Time Adaptation of Deep Learning Models for Semantic Segmentation
    Hariharan Ravishankar, Naveen Paluru, Prasad Sudhakar, Phaneendra K. Yalavarthy
    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.2025; 44(6): 2553.     CrossRef
  • Carotid plaque segmentation and classification using MRI-based plaque texture analysis and convolutional neural network
    Zakarya Hasan Ahmed Abu Alregal, Gehad Abdullah Amran, Ali A. Al-Bakhrani, Saleh Abdul Amir Mohammad, Amerah Alabrah, Lubna Alkhalil, Abdalla Ibrahim, Maryam Ghaffar
    Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Approaches for Automated Prediction of Treatment Response in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Based on CT and PET Imaging
    Randy Guzmán Gómez, Guadalupe Lopez Lopez, Victor M. Alvarado, Froylan Lopez Lopez, Eréndira Esqueda Cisneros, Hazel López Moreno
    Tomography.2025; 11(7): 78.     CrossRef
  • Inference time correction based on confidence and uncertainty for improved deep-learning model performance and explainability in medical image classification
    Joel Jeffrey, Ashwin RajKumar, Sudhanshu Pandey, Lokesh Bathala, Phaneendra K. Yalavarthy
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2025; 125: 102630.     CrossRef
  • Fully automated pedicle screw manufacturer identification in plain radiograph with deep learning methods
    Rattapoom Waranusast, Panomkhawn Riyamongkol, Santi Weerakul, Nattharut Chaibhuddanugul, Artit Laoruengthana, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(9): 3940.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of AI support levels in clinical interpretation of traumatic pelvic radiographs
    Yu-San Tee, Jen-Fu Huang, Yu-Ting Huang, Chi-Po Hsu, Huan-Wu Chen, Chi-Hsun Hsieh, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chien-Hung Liao
    npj Digital Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Asynchronous and focal federated learning for skin lesion classification under local data scarcity and class imbalance
    Shichao Ma, Yun-Hin Chan, Edith C.H. Ngai, Joshua W.K. Ho
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.2025; 272: 109073.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities
    Yiheng Hu, Chao Gao, Yiren Wang, Zhongjian Wen, Cheng Yang, Hairui Deng, Shouying Chen, Yunfei Li, Haowen Pang, Ping Zhou, Bin Liao, Yan Luo
    Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Imaging Modalities: Cornerstones of Precision Medicine’s Future
    Rahul Garg
    Sarvodaya International Journal of Medicine.2025; 1(3): 106.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges
    Man Wang, Wenguang Chang, Yuan Zhang
    MedComm.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Highly Cited Artificial Intelligence Research Studies Published in Neurosurgical Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Yazid Maghrabi, Abdulhakim B Jamjoom, Abdulhadi Algahtani, Ohood H Alshareef, Omar M Jamjoom, Moajeb Alzahrani
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Hand Radiographs Interpretability Insights and Web Application
    Kanglin Cai, Dengfeng Dou, Guibing Deng, Yunzhen Zhan, Huilian Huang, Zhitao Feng
    ImmunoTargets and Therapy.2025; Volume 14: 1333.     CrossRef
  • A Fully Automatic Method to Segment Choroid Plexuses in Multiple Sclerosis Using Conventional MRI Sequences
    Loredana Storelli, Elisabetta Pagani, Martina Rubin, Monica Margoni, Massimo Filippi, Maria A. Rocca
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 59(5): 1643.     CrossRef
  • An AI based smart-phone system for asbestos identification
    Michael Rolfe, Samantha Hayes, Meaghan Smith, Matthew Owen, Michael Spruth, Chris McCarthy, Abdur Forkan, Abhik Banerjee, Rosalie K. Hocking
    Journal of Hazardous Materials.2024; 463: 132853.     CrossRef
  • Artificial neural networks in kinetic analysis of glass crystallization: The case of complex nucleation-growth mechanisms
    Kristian Hovde Liland, Giorgio Luciano, Roman Svoboda
    Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids.2024; 626: 122802.     CrossRef
  • Synergizing photon-counting CT with deep learning: potential enhancements in medical imaging
    Ismail Mese, Ceylan Altintas Taslicay, Ali Kemal Sivrioglu
    Acta Radiologica.2024; 65(2): 159.     CrossRef
  • Multi-pose-based convolutional neural network model for diagnosis of patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis
    Seyeon Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Youngbin Ahn, Chang-Hyun Lee, Young-Gon Kim, Woon Tak Yuh, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chi Heon Kim, Ki-Jeong Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Experimental and machine learning study on a novel high-performance hybrid steel-grout connector for cross-laminated timber panels under pre-yield cyclic loads
    Blériot V. Feujofack K., Cristiano Loss
    Engineering Structures.2024; 303: 117530.     CrossRef
  • Automatic Identification and Severity Classification of Retinal Biomarkers in SD-OCT Using Dilated Depthwise Separable Convolution ResNet with SVM Classifier
    Adithiya S V, Dharani Bai G, Rajiv Raman
    Current Eye Research.2024; 49(5): 513.     CrossRef
  • Benign and malignant classification of breast tumor ultrasound images using conventional radiomics and transfer learning features: A multicenter retrospective study
    Ronghui Tian, Guoxiu Lu, Shiting Tang, Liang Sang, He Ma, Wei Qian, Wei Yang
    Medical Engineering & Physics.2024; 125: 104117.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is the Future Defined by Artificial Intelligence?
    Maximilian J. Waldner, Deike Strobel
    Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.2024; 45(01): 8.     CrossRef
  • AI-luminating Artificial Intelligence in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review on the Role of AI in Endoscopy, Histology, and Imaging for IBD
    Phillip Gu, Oreen Mendonca, Dan Carter, Shishir Dube, Paul Wang, Xiuzhen Huang, Debiao Li, Jason H Moore, Dermot P B McGovern
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2024; 30(12): 2467.     CrossRef
  • Label-free quantification of gold nanoparticles at the single-cell level using a multi-column convolutional neural network (MC-CNN)
    Abu S. M. Mohsin, Shadab H. Choudhury
    The Analyst.2024; 149(8): 2412.     CrossRef
  • Concatenated Modified LeNet Approach for Classifying Pneumonia Images
    Dhayanithi Jaganathan, Sathiyabhama Balsubramaniam, Vidhushavarshini Sureshkumar, Seshathiri Dhanasekaran
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(3): 328.     CrossRef
  • Wrist fracture detection using self-supervised learning methodology
    Sachin Ramdas Thorat, Davendranath G. Jha, Ashish K. Sharma, Dhanraj V. Katkar
    Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research.2024; 8: 133.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs
    Woon Tak Yuh, Eun Kyung Khil, Yu Sung Yoon, Burnyoung Kim, Hongjun Yoon, Jihe Lim, Kyoung Yeon Lee, Yeong Seo Yoo, Kyeong Deuk An
    Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in dentistry — A scoping review
    Ruchi Vashisht, Aaina Sharma, Tanvi Kiran, Satnam Singh Jolly, Prabhleen Kaur Brar, Jay Veer Puri
    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology.2024; 36(4): 579.     CrossRef
  • Unraveling the Impact of Class Imbalance on Deep-Learning Models for Medical Image Classification
    Carlos J. Hellín, Alvaro A. Olmedo, Adrián Valledor, Josefa Gómez, Miguel López-Benítez, Abdelhamid Tayebi
    Applied Sciences.2024; 14(8): 3419.     CrossRef
  • Deep Transfer Learning Using Real-World Image Features for Medical Image Classification, with a Case Study on Pneumonia X-ray Images
    Chanhoe Gu, Minhyeok Lee
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(4): 406.     CrossRef
  • Combating COVID-19 Crisis using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Approach: Systematic Review
    Kavya Singh, Navjeet Kaur, Ashish Prabhu
    Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 24(8): 737.     CrossRef
  • ConvNextUNet: A small-region attentioned model for cardiac MRI segmentation
    Huiyi Zhang, Zemin Cai
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2024; 177: 108592.     CrossRef
  • Validation of artificial intelligence application for dental caries diagnosis on intraoral bitewing and periapical radiographs
    Viktor Szabó, Bence Tamás Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders
    Journal of Dentistry.2024; 147: 105105.     CrossRef
  • Detection and Localization of Spine Disorders from Plain Radiography
    İlkay Yıldız Potter, Diana Yeritsyan, Edward K. Rodriguez, Jim S. Wu, Ara Nazarian, Ashkan Vaziri
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 37(6): 2967.     CrossRef
  • Possible benefits, challenges, pitfalls, and future perspective of using ChatGPT in pathology
    Durre Aden, Sufian Zaheer, Sabina Khan
    Revista Española de Patología.2024; 57(3): 198.     CrossRef
  • Classification of Muscular Dystrophies from MR Images Improves Using the Swin Transformer Deep Learning Model
    Alfonso Mastropietro, Nicola Casali, Maria Taccogna, Maria D’Angelo, Giovanna Rizzo, Denis Peruzzo
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(6): 580.     CrossRef
  • Utilizing ChatGPT for Curriculum Learning in Developing a Clinical Grade Pneumothorax Detection Model: A Multisite Validation Study
    Joseph Chang, Kuan-Jung Lee, Ti-Hao Wang, Chung-Ming Chen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(14): 4042.     CrossRef
  • Assessing microvascular invasion in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: an online interactive nomogram integrating inflammatory markers, radiomics, and convolutional neural networks
    Yun Zhong, Lingfeng Chen, Fadian Ding, Wenshi Ou, Xiang Zhang, Shangeng Weng
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep learning-based mobile application for the enhancement of pneumonia medical imaging analysis: A case-study of West-Meru Hospital
    Japheth Mumo Kimeu, Michael Kisangiri, Hope Mbelwa, Judith Leo
    Informatics in Medicine Unlocked.2024; 50: 101582.     CrossRef
  • Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy
    Qing Li, Shan Geng, Hao Luo, Wei Wang, Ya-Qi Mo, Qing Luo, Lu Wang, Guan-Bin Song, Jian-Peng Sheng, Bo Xu
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI deep learning models for assisted diagnosis of knee pathologies: a systematic review
    Keiley Mead, Tom Cross, Greg Roger, Rohan Sabharwal, Sahaj Singh, Nicola Giannotti
    European Radiology.2024; 35(5): 2457.     CrossRef
  • Combining a forward supervised filter learning with a sparse NMF for breast cancer histopathological image classification
    ArunaDevi Karuppasamy, Abdelhamid Abdesselam, Hamza zidoum, Rachid Hedjam, Maiya Al-Bahri
    Intelligence-Based Medicine.2024; 10: 100174.     CrossRef
  • Using Compressed JPEG and JPEG2000 Medical Images in Deep Learning: A Review
    Ilona Anna Urbaniak
    Applied Sciences.2024; 14(22): 10524.     CrossRef
  • ViT‐AMD: A New Deep Learning Model for Age‐Related Macular Degeneration Diagnosis From Fundus Images
    Ngoc Thien Le, Thanh Le Truong, Sunchai Deelertpaiboon, Wattanasak Srisiri, Pear Ferreira Pongsachareonnont, Disorn Suwajanakorn, Apivat Mavichak, Rath Itthipanichpong, Widhyakorn Asdornwised, Watit Benjapolakul, Surachai Chaitusaney, Pasu Kaewplung, Zhiy
    International Journal of Intelligent Systems.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quantum deep learning in Parkinson’s disease prediction using hybrid quantum–classical convolution neural network
    Mohemmed Sha, Mohamudha Parveen Rahamathulla
    Quantum Information Processing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • GPD-Nodule: A Lightweight Lung Nodule Detection and Segmentation Framework on Computed Tomography Images Using Uniform Superpixel Generation
    Sudipta Modak, Esam Abdel-Raheem, Luis Rueda
    IEEE Access.2024; 12: 154933.     CrossRef
  • Patch-based convolutional neural networks for automatic landmark detection of 3D facial images in clinical settings
    Bodore Al-baker, Ashraf Ayoub, Xiangyang Ju, Peter Mossey
    European Journal of Orthodontics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep learning methods for 3D magnetic resonance image denoising, bias field and motion artifact correction: a comprehensive review
    Ram Singh, Navdeep Singh, Lakhwinder Kaur
    Physics in Medicine & Biology.2024; 69(23): 23TR01.     CrossRef
  • Analyzing Activation Functions With Transfer Learning-Based Layer Customization for Improved Brain Tumor Classification
    Soumyarashmi Panigrahi, Dibya Ranjan Das Adhikary, Binod Kumar Pattanayak
    IEEE Access.2024; 12: 168707.     CrossRef
  • COGNITIVE ARBITRAGE: THE OUTSOURCING OF INTELLIGENCE
    James P. Eicher, William J. Mea
    Performance Improvement Journal.2024; 63(2): 74.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Intrusion Detection Systems with Dimensionality Reduction and Multi-Stacking Ensemble Techniques
    Ali Mohammed Alsaffar, Mostafa Nouri-Baygi, Hamed Zolbanin
    Algorithms.2024; 17(12): 550.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Ultrasound: Current Developments, Limitations and Future Directions
    Yizhong Wu, Daryl Ramai, Eric R. Smith, Paulo F. Mega, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Marco Spadaccini, Marcello Maida, Apostolis Papaefthymiou
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4196.     CrossRef
  • Social roles of artificial intelligence. Part 2. Artificial intelligence systems in scientific research and medical practice
    I. A. Aseeva
    Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management.2024; 14(5): 240.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Self-Supervised Learning-Based Method for Dynamic CT Brain Perfusion Imaging
    Chi-Kuang Liu, Hsuan-Ming Huang
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 38(4): 2102.     CrossRef
  • Auxiliary diagnosis of small tumor in mammography based on deep learning
    Yanan Liu, Jingyu Li, Dongbin Xu, Hongyan Meng, Jing Dong, Tianyu Zhao, Li Tang, He Zou
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.2023; 14(2): 1061.     CrossRef
  • Improving blueberry firmness classification with spectral and textural features of microstructures using hyperspectral microscope imaging and deep learning
    Bosoon Park, Taesung Shin, Jeong-Seok Cho, Jeong-Ho Lim, Kie-Jae Park
    Postharvest Biology and Technology.2023; 195: 112154.     CrossRef
  • Automatic detection of spongiosis associated with oral lichenoid lesions using machine learning
    Yu Akaike, Kei-ichi Morita, Kei Sakamoto, Fumihiko Tsushima, Kou Kayamori, Noboru Maruta, Kotaro Yamazaki, Eri Anzai, Erina Tonouchi, Hiroyuki Harada, Tohru Ikeda, Tetsuya Yoda
    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology.2023; 35(4): 368.     CrossRef
  • Combining band-frequency separation and deep neural networks for optoacoustic imaging
    Martín G. González, Matias Vera, Leonardo J. Rey Vega
    Optics and Lasers in Engineering.2023; 163: 107471.     CrossRef
  • Automated Ovarian Cancer Identification Using End-to-End Deep Learning and Second Harmonic Generation Imaging
    Guangxing Wang, Huiling Zhan, Tianyi Luo, Bingzi Kang, Xiaolu Li, Gangqin Xi, Zhiyi Liu, Shuangmu Zhuo
    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.2023; 29(4: Biophot): 1.     CrossRef
  • Automatic machine learning-based classification of mandibular third molar impaction status
    Noboru Maruta, Kei-ichi Morita, Yosuke Harazono, Eri Anzai, Yu Akaike, Kotaro Yamazaki, Erina Tonouchi, Tetsuya Yoda
    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology.2023; 35(4): 327.     CrossRef
  • Deep Transfer Learning Based Parkinson’s Disease Detection Using Optimized Feature Selection
    Sura Mahmood Abdullah, Thekra Abbas, Munzir Hubiba Bashir, Ishfaq Ahmad Khaja, Musheer Ahmad, Naglaa F. Soliman, Walid El-Shafai
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 3511.     CrossRef
  • High Performance Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Brain Inspired Cortical Coding Method
    Meric Yucel, Ahmet Sertbas, Burak Berk Ustundag
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 8345.     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography Imaging Features of Lung Cancer under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Its Correlation with Pathology
    Fei Han, Pingfeng Qiu, Kan Feng, Mohammad Farukh Hashmi
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • The implications of 5G technology on cardiothoracic surgical services in India
    Aditya Narsipur Doddamane, Arkalgud Sampath Kumar
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2023; 39(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Decision Support System for Geriatric Dental Treatment Using a Bayesian Network and a Convolutional Neural Network
    Bhornsawan Thanathornwong, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Kan Ouivirach
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2023; 29(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Stroke risk study based on deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging carotid plaque automatic segmentation algorithm
    Ya-Fang Chen, Zhen-Jie Chen, You-Yu Lin, Zhi-Qiang Lin, Chun-Nuan Chen, Mei-Li Yang, Jin-Yin Zhang, Yuan-zhe Li, Yi Wang, Yin-Hui Huang
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in the application of computational fluid dynamics in cardiovascular flow
    Nitesh Kumar, Ganesha A, Girish H, Shiva Kumar, Gowrava Shenoy B
    Cogent Engineering.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Continuous Eye Disease Severity Evaluation System using Siamese Neural Networks
    Muyideen Abdulraheem, Idowu D. Oladipo, Sunday Adeola Ajagbe, Ghaniyyat B. Balogun, Nissi O. Emma-Adamah
    ParadigmPlus.2023; 4(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • A Study of CNN and Transfer Learning in Medical Imaging: Advantages, Challenges, Future Scope
    Ahmad Waleed Salehi, Shakir Khan, Gaurav Gupta, Bayan Ibrahimm Alabduallah, Abrar Almjally, Hadeel Alsolai, Tamanna Siddiqui, Adel Mellit
    Sustainability.2023; 15(7): 5930.     CrossRef
  • Automated segmentation of foodborne bacteria from chicken rinse with hyperspectral microscope imaging and deep learning methods
    Bosoon Park, Taesung Shin, Rui Kang, Alexandre Fong, Barry McDonogh, Seung-Chul Yoon
    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.2023; 208: 107802.     CrossRef
  • Vision Transformers in medical computer vision—A contemplative retrospection
    Arshi Parvaiz, Muhammad Anwaar Khalid, Rukhsana Zafar, Huma Ameer, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Moazam Fraz
    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.2023; 122: 106126.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Publication Activity and Research Trends in the Field of AI Medical Applications: Network Approach
    Oleg E. Karpov, Elena N. Pitsik, Semen A. Kurkin, Vladimir A. Maksimenko, Alexander V. Gusev, Natali N. Shusharina, Alexander E. Hramov
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(7): 5335.     CrossRef
  • LUVS-Net: A Lightweight U-Net Vessel Segmentor for Retinal Vasculature Detection in Fundus Images
    Muhammad Talha Islam, Haroon Ahmed Khan, Khuram Naveed, Ali Nauman, Sardar Muhammad Gulfam, Sung Won Kim
    Electronics.2023; 12(8): 1786.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal data fusion for cancer biomarker discovery with deep learning
    Sandra Steyaert, Marija Pizurica, Divya Nagaraj, Priya Khandelwal, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Andrew J. Gentles, Olivier Gevaert
    Nature Machine Intelligence.2023; 5(4): 351.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Stem Cell State Using Cell Image‐Based Deep Learning
    Minjae Kim, Yong Namkung, Donghun Hyun, Sunghoi Hong
    Advanced Intelligent Systems.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Kronecker convolutions in deep learning technique for automated detection of kidney stones with coronal CT images
    Kiran Kumar Patro, Jaya Prakash Allam, Bala Chakravarthy Neelapu, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, U Rajendra Acharya, Mohamed Hammad, Ozal Yildirim, Paweł Pławiak
    Information Sciences.2023; 640: 119005.     CrossRef
  • YOLO-Based Deep Learning Model for Pressure Ulcer Detection and Classification
    Bader Aldughayfiq, Farzeen Ashfaq, N. Z. Jhanjhi, Mamoona Humayun
    Healthcare.2023; 11(9): 1222.     CrossRef
  • Automated diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning models: A review
    Mahboobeh Jafari, Afshin Shoeibi, Marjane Khodatars, Navid Ghassemi, Parisa Moridian, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Abbas Khosravi, Sai Ho Ling, Niloufar Delfan, Yu-Dong Zhang, Shui-Hua Wang, Juan M. Gorriz, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, U. Rajendra Acharya
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2023; 160: 106998.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge-guided 2.5D CNN for cerebral microbleeds detection
    Zhongding Fang, Rong Zhang, Lijun Guo, Tianxiang Xia, Yingqing Zeng, Xiping Wu
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2023; 86: 105078.     CrossRef
  • Deep-Masker: A Deep Learning–based Tool to Assess Chord Length from Murine Lung Images
    Jiantao Pu, Adriana S. Leme, Camilla de Lima e Silva, Cameron Beeche, Toru Nyunoya, Melanie Königshoff, Divay Chandra
    American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology.2023; 69(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • A History of Innovation: Tracing the Evolution of Imaging Modalities for the Preoperative Planning of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
    Jevan Cevik, Ishith Seth, David J. Hunter-Smith, Warren M. Rozen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(16): 5246.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning assisted classification of spectral photoacoustic imaging of carotid plaques
    Camilo Cano, Nastaran Mohammadian Rad, Amir Gholampour, Marc van Sambeek, Josien Pluim, Richard Lopata, Min Wu
    Photoacoustics.2023; 33: 100544.     CrossRef
  • Differentiating Radiation Necrosis and Metastatic Progression in Brain Tumors Using Radiomics and Machine Learning
    Elahheh Salari, Haitham Elsamaloty, Aniruddha Ray, Mersiha Hadziahmetovic, E. Ishmael Parsai
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 46(11): 486.     CrossRef
  • Fully Automated Skull Stripping from Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using Mask RCNN-Based Deep Learning Neural Networks
    Humera Azam, Humera Tariq, Danish Shehzad, Saad Akbar, Habib Shah, Zamin Ali Khan
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(9): 1255.     CrossRef
  • Emerging role of quantitative imaging (radiomics) and artificial intelligence in precision oncology
    Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Umeshkumar B. Sherkhane, Pooj Dwivedi, Senders Puts, Biche Osong, Alberto Traverso, Nilendu Purandare, Leonard Wee, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Andre Dekker
    Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy.2023; : 569.     CrossRef
  • COMPARISON OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK IMAGE CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE RELATIVE TO THE AMOUNT OF TRAINING DATA USING CARDIOMEGALY X-RAY IMAGES
    MINJEONG KIM, JUNGHUN KIM, JONGMIN LEE
    Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single image super-resolution approaches in medical images based-deep learning: a survey
    Walid El-Shafai, Anas M. Ali, Samy Abd El-Nabi, El-Sayed M. El-Rabaie, Fathi E. Abd El-Samie
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2023; 83(10): 30467.     CrossRef
  • Generation of fluoroscopy-alike radiographs as alternative datasets for deep learning in interventional radiology
    Wilbur K. S. Fum, Mohammad Nazri Md Shah, Raja Rizal Azman Raja Aman, Khairul Azmi Abd Kadir, David Wei Wen, Sum Leong, Li Kuo Tan
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.2023; 46(4): 1535.     CrossRef
  • Development of an artificial neural network for ECG classification
    Kseniya Kireeva, Lyudmila Anatol'evna Korobova Lyudmila, Denis Arapov
    Modeling of systems and processes.2023; 16(3): 42.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning for Automated Classification of Abnormal Lung Sounds Obtained from Public Databases: A Systematic Review
    Juan P. Garcia-Mendez, Amos Lal, Svetlana Herasevich, Aysun Tekin, Yuliya Pinevich, Kirill Lipatov, Hsin-Yi Wang, Shahraz Qamar, Ivan N. Ayala, Ivan Khapov, Danielle J. Gerberi, Daniel Diedrich, Brian W. Pickering, Vitaly Herasevich
    Bioengineering.2023; 10(10): 1155.     CrossRef
  • Automated segmentation of meningioma from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI images in a case series using a marker-controlled watershed segmentation and fuzzy C-means clustering machine learning algorithm
    Sana Mohammadi, Sadegh Ghaderi, Kayvan Ghaderi, Mahdi Mohammadi, Masoud Hoseini Pourasl
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 111: 108818.     CrossRef
  • UNFOLD: 3-D U-Net, 3-D CNN, and 3-D Transformer-Based Hyperspectral Image Denoising
    Aditya Dixit, Anup Kumar Gupta, Puneet Gupta, Saurabh Srivastava, Ankur Garg
    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.2023; 61: 1.     CrossRef
  • Information maximization-based clustering of histopathology images using deep learning
    Mahfujul Islam Rumman, Naoaki Ono, Kenoki Ohuchida, MD. Altaf-Ul-Amin, Ming Huang, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yuan Lai
    PLOS Digital Health.2023; 2(12): e0000391.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing diffuse optical imaging for breast tissues with a dual-encoder neural network to preserve small structural information and fine features
    Nazish Murad, Min-Chun Pan, Ya-Fen Hsu
    Journal of Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning”
    In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Imaging and Mechanical Objectivity in Medicine
    Meghan V. Kerr, Pier Bryden, Elsie T. Nguyen
    Academic Radiology.2022; 29(3): 409.     CrossRef
  • Artificial neural networks in cardiology: analysis of graphic data
    P. S. Onishchenko, K. Yu. Klyshnikov, E. A. Ovcharenko
    Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2022; 20(4): 193.     CrossRef
  • A radiomics approach for lung nodule detection in thoracic CT images based on the dynamic patterns of morphological variation
    Fan-Ya Lin, Yeun-Chung Chang, Hsuan-Yu Huang, Chia-Chen Li, Yi-Chang Chen, Chung-Ming Chen
    European Radiology.2022; 32(6): 3767.     CrossRef
  • Two-phase learning-based 3D deblurring method for digital breast tomosynthesis images
    Yunsu Choi, Minah Han, Hanjoo Jang, Hyunjung Shim, Jongduk Baek, Chi-Hua Chen
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(1): e0262736.     CrossRef
  • A three-stage ensemble boosted convolutional neural network for classification and analysis of COVID-19 chest x-ray images
    S. Kalaivani, K. Seetharaman
    International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering.2022; 3: 35.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning of Retinal Imaging: A Useful Tool for Coronary Artery Calcium Score Prediction in Diabetic Patients
    Rubén G. Barriada, Olga Simó-Servat, Alejandra Planas, Cristina Hernández, Rafael Simó, David Masip
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(3): 1401.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning based analysis of stroke lesions on mouse tissue sections
    Gerasimos Damigos, Evangelia I Zacharaki, Nefeli Zerva, Angelos Pavlopoulos, Konstantina Chatzikyrkou, Argyro Koumenti, Konstantinos Moustakas, Constantinos Pantos, Iordanis Mourouzis, Athanasios Lourbopoulos
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism.2022; 42(8): 1463.     CrossRef
  • A survey of deep learning methods for multiple sclerosis identification using brain MRI images
    Melike Sah, Cem Direkoglu
    Neural Computing and Applications.2022; 34(10): 7349.     CrossRef
  • Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?
    Yanting Liu, Min-Gi Lee, Jin-Sung Kim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2022; 63(4): 305.     CrossRef
  • Automated prediction of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score from CT using a novel deep learning algorithm
    Sophia A. Doerr, Carly Weber-Levine, Andrew M. Hersh, Tolulope Awosika, Brendan Judy, Yike Jin, Divyaansh Raj, Ann Liu, Daniel Lubelski, Craig K. Jones, Haris I. Sair, Nicholas Theodore
    Neurosurgical Focus.2022; 52(4): E5.     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Used for Inherited Retinal Disease Management
    Meltem Esengönül, Ana Marta, João Beirão, Ivan Miguel Pires, António Cunha
    Medicina.2022; 58(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound classification of breast masses using a comprehensive Nakagami imaging and machine learning framework
    Ahmad Chowdhury, Rezwana R. Razzaque, Sabiq Muhtadi, Ahmad Shafiullah, Ehsan Ul Islam Abir, Brian S. Garra, S. Kaisar Alam
    Ultrasonics.2022; 124: 106744.     CrossRef
  • Teacher-student approach for lung tumor segmentation from mixed-supervised datasets
    Vemund Fredriksen, Svein Ole M. Sevle, André Pedersen, Thomas Langø, Gabriel Kiss, Frank Lindseth, Robertas Damaševičius
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266147.     CrossRef
  • A Review on Bayesian Deep Learning in Healthcare: Applications and Challenges
    Abdullah A. Abdullah, Masoud M. Hassan, Yaseen T. Mustafa
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 36538.     CrossRef
  • Neural networks applied in kinetic analysis of complex nucleation-growth processes: Outstanding solution for fully overlapping reaction mechanisms
    Kristian Hovde Liland, Roman Svoboda, Giorgio Luciano, Nikita Muravyev
    Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids.2022; 588: 121640.     CrossRef
  • Trends in using IoT with machine learning in smart health assessment
    Suvanwes Rath
    International journal of health sciences.2022; : 3335.     CrossRef
  • Automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with artificial intelligence
    M. Takeuchi, T. Collins, A. Ndagijimana, H. Kawakubo, Y. Kitagawa, J. Marescaux, D. Mutter, S. Perretta, A. Hostettler, B. Dallemagne
    Hernia.2022; 26(6): 1669.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility study on Raman spectra-based deep learning models for monitoring the contamination degree and level of aflatoxin B1 in edible oil
    Jihong Deng, Xujie Zhang, Meichen Li, Hui Jiang, Quansheng Chen
    Microchemical Journal.2022; 180: 107613.     CrossRef
  • Beyond automatic medical image segmentation—the spectrum between fully manual and fully automatic delineation
    Michael J Trimpl, Sergey Primakov, Philippe Lambin, Eleanor P J Stride, Katherine A Vallis, Mark J Gooding
    Physics in Medicine & Biology.2022; 67(12): 12TR01.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic triage in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis using a deep learning system of radiographs
    Tackeun Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Seyeon Park, Jae-Koo Lee, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chi Heon Kim, Ki-Jeong Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(1): 104.     CrossRef
  • Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Spinal Pain Questionnaire: Validation and User Satisfaction
    Kyoung Hyup Nam, Da Young Kim, Dong Hwan Kim, Jung Hwan Lee, Jae Il Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, Joo Young Park, Jae Hyun Hwang, Sang Seok Yun, Byung Kwan Choi, Min Gyu Kim, In Ho Han
    Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Toward deep observation: A systematic survey on artificial intelligence techniques to monitor fetus via ultrasound images
    Mahmood Alzubaidi, Marco Agus, Khalid Alyafei, Khaled A. Althelaya, Uzair Shah, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Mohammed Anbar, Michel Makhlouf, Mowafa Househ
    iScience.2022; 25(8): 104713.     CrossRef
  • A retrospective study of 3D deep learning approach incorporating coordinate information to improve the segmentation of pre- and post-operative abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Thanongchai Siriapisith, Worapan Kusakunniran, Peter Haddawy
    PeerJ Computer Science.2022; 8: e1033.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders using artificial intelligence technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nayansi Jha, Kwang-sig Lee, Yoon-Ji Kim, Essam Al-Moraissi
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(8): e0272715.     CrossRef
  • EVAE-Net: An Ensemble Variational Autoencoder Deep Learning Network for COVID-19 Classification Based on Chest X-ray Images
    Daniel Addo, Shijie Zhou, Jehoiada Kofi Jackson, Grace Ugochi Nneji, Happy Nkanta Monday, Kwabena Sarpong, Rutherford Agbeshi Patamia, Favour Ekong, Christyn Akosua Owusu-Agyei
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(11): 2569.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning in clinical diagnosis, prognostication, and management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI): A systematic review
    Nicholas Dietz, Vaitheesh Jaganathan, Victoria Alkin, Jersey Mettille, Maxwell Boakye, Doniel Drazin
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2022; 35: 102046.     CrossRef
  • Application of Deep Learning to IVC Filter Detection from CT Scans
    Rahul Gomes, Connor Kamrowski, Pavithra Devy Mohan, Cameron Senor, Jordan Langlois, Joseph Wildenberg
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(10): 2475.     CrossRef
  • Echocardiographic Image Segmentation for Diagnosing Fetal Cardiac Rhabdomyoma During Pregnancy Using Deep Learning
    Sudhakar Sengan, Abolfazl Mehbodniya, Surbhi Bhatia, S. S. Saranya, Meshal Alharbi, Shakila Basheer, V. Subramaniyaswamy
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 114077.     CrossRef
  • Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Discrimination on MRI by Comparison of Hierarchical and Simple Layered Convolutional Neural Networks
    Li Ji, Rongzhi Mao, Jian Wu, Cheng Ge, Feng Xiao, Xiaojun Xu, Liangxu Xie, Xiaofeng Gu
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(10): 2478.     CrossRef
  • Enabling Intelligent IoTs for Histopathology Image Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Mohammed H. Alali, Arman Roohi, Shaahin Angizi, Jitender S. Deogun
    Micromachines.2022; 13(8): 1364.     CrossRef
  • Ubiquitous and smart healthcare monitoring frameworks based on machine learning: A comprehensive review
    Anand Motwani, Piyush Kumar Shukla, Mahesh Pawar
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2022; 134: 102431.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning in Ischemic Stroke Imaging Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
    Liyuan Cui, Zhiyuan Fan, Yingjian Yang, Rui Liu, Dajiang Wang, Yingying Feng, Jiahui Lu, Yifeng Fan, Yu Chang Tyan
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fusing compressed deep ConvNets with a self-normalizing residual block and alpha dropout for a cost-efficient classification and diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract diseases
    Francis Jesmar P. Montalbo
    MethodsX.2022; 9: 101925.     CrossRef
  • Synthesizing realistic high-resolution retina image by style-based generative adversarial network and its utilization
    Mingyu Kim, You Na Kim, Miso Jang, Jeongeun Hwang, Hong-Kyu Kim, Sang Chul Yoon, Yoon Jeon Kim, Namkug Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Active learning for data efficient semantic segmentation of canine bones in radiographs
    D. E. Moreira da Silva, Lio Gonçalves, Pedro Franco-Gonçalo, Bruno Colaço, Sofia Alves-Pimenta, Mário Ginja, Manuel Ferreira, Vitor Filipe
    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Derin öğrenme mimarilerini kullanarak göğüs BT görüntülerinden otomatik Covid-19 tahmini
    Veysel TÜRK, Hatice ÇATAL REİS, Serhat KAYA
    Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A systematic review on the use of explainability in deep learning systems for computer aided diagnosis in radiology: Limited use of explainable AI?
    Arjan M. Groen, Rik Kraan, Shahira F. Amirkhan, Joost G. Daams, Mario Maas
    European Journal of Radiology.2022; 157: 110592.     CrossRef
  • Convolutional Neural Network Applications in Fire Debris Classification
    Anuradha Akmeemana, Mary R. Williams, Michael E. Sigman
    Chemosensors.2022; 10(10): 377.     CrossRef
  • Advances of deep learning in electrical impedance tomography image reconstruction
    Tao Zhang, Xiang Tian, XueChao Liu, JianAn Ye, Feng Fu, XueTao Shi, RuiGang Liu, CanHua Xu
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence to Investigate Targeted Nanoparticles’ Uptake in TNBC Cells
    Rafia Ali, Mehala Balamurali, Pegah Varamini
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 16070.     CrossRef
  • Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Imaging of Ischemic Stroke
    Ara Cho, Luu-Ngoc Do, Seul Kee Kim, Woong Yoon, Byung Hyun Baek, Ilwoo Park
    Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2022; 26(4): 191.     CrossRef
  • A Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Glioblastoma, Brain Metastasis, and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: An External Validation Study
    Leonardo Tariciotti, Davide Ferlito, Valerio M. Caccavella, Andrea Di Cristofori, Giorgio Fiore, Luigi G. Remore, Martina Giordano, Giulia Remoli, Giulio Bertani, Stefano Borsa, Mauro Pluderi, Paolo Remida, Gianpaolo Basso, Carlo Giussani, Marco Locatelli
    NeuroSci.2022; 4(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Convolution neural network for effective burn region segmentation of color images
    Joohi Chauhan, Puneet Goyal
    Burns.2021; 47(4): 854.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology: what is currently possible?
    Min-Suk Heo, Jo-Eun Kim, Jae-Joon Hwang, Sang-Sun Han, Jin-Soo Kim, Won-Jin Yi, In-Woo Park
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • ivadomed: A Medical Imaging Deep Learning Toolbox
    Charley Gros, Andreanne Lemay, Olivier Vincent, Lucas Rouhier, Marie-Helene Bourget, Anthime Bucquet, Joseph Cohen, Julien Cohen-Adad
    Journal of Open Source Software.2021; 6(58): 2868.     CrossRef
  • Use of artificial intelligence in the imaging of sarcopenia: A narrative review of current status and perspectives
    Miłosz Rozynek, Iwona Kucybała, Andrzej Urbanik, Wadim Wojciechowski
    Nutrition.2021; 89: 111227.     CrossRef
  • Trends in Using IoT with Machine Learning in Health Prediction System
    Amani Aldahiri, Bashair Alrashed, Walayat Hussain
    Forecasting.2021; 3(1): 181.     CrossRef
  • Volume-of-Interest Aware Deep Neural Networks for Rapid Chest CT-Based COVID-19 Patient Risk Assessment
    Anargyros Chatzitofis, Pierandrea Cancian, Vasileios Gkitsas, Alessandro Carlucci, Panagiotis Stalidis, Georgios Albanis, Antonis Karakottas, Theodoros Semertzidis, Petros Daras, Caterina Giannitto, Elena Casiraghi, Federica Mrakic Sposta, Giulia Vatteron
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(6): 2842.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning in spine surgery: Predictive analytics, imaging applications and next steps
    Rushikesh S. Joshi, Darryl Lau, Christopher P. Ames
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2021; 33(2): 100878.     CrossRef
  • Multiple Lesions Insertion: boosting diabetic retinopathy screening through Poisson editing
    Zekuan Yu, Rongyao Yan, Yuanyuan Yu, Xiao Ma, Xiao Liu, Jie Liu, Qiushi Ren, Yanye Lu
    Biomedical Optics Express.2021; 12(5): 2773.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Machine Learning to Imaging of Spinal Disorders: Current Status and Future Directions
    Zamir A. Merali, Errol Colak, Jefferson R. Wilson
    Global Spine Journal.2021; 11(1_suppl): 23S.     CrossRef
  • A 2021 update on cancer image analytics with deep learning
    Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Amit Sethi, Anil Reddy Konduru, Abhishek Mahajan, Swapnil Ulhas Rane
    WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A survey on deep learning in medical image reconstruction
    Emmanuel Ahishakiye, Martin Bastiaan Van Gijzen, Julius Tumwiine, Ruth Wario, Johnes Obungoloch
    Intelligent Medicine.2021; 1(3): 118.     CrossRef
  • A deep learning model for detection of cervical spinal cord compression in MRI scans
    Zamir Merali, Justin Z. Wang, Jetan H. Badhiwala, Christopher D. Witiw, Jefferson R. Wilson, Michael G. Fehlings
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • End-to-end deep learning for recognition of ploidy status using time-lapse videos
    Chun-I Lee, Yan-Ru Su, Chien-Hong Chen, T. Arthur Chang, Esther En-Shu Kuo, Wei-Lin Zheng, Wen-Ting Hsieh, Chun-Chia Huang, Maw-Sheng Lee, Mark Liu
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.2021; 38(7): 1655.     CrossRef
  • Contribution of CT-Scan Analysis by Artificial Intelligence to the Clinical Care of TBI Patients
    Clément Brossard, Benjamin Lemasson, Arnaud Attyé, Jules-Arnaud de Busschère, Jean-François Payen, Emmanuel L. Barbier, Jules Grèze, Pierre Bouzat
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • R2U3D: Recurrent Residual 3D U-Net for Lung Segmentation
    Dhaval D. Kadia, Md Zahangir Alom, Ranga Burada, Tam V. Nguyen, Vijayan K. Asari
    IEEE Access.2021; 9: 88835.     CrossRef
  • Automatic Segmentation of Choroid Layer Using Deep Learning on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Wei Ping Hsia, Siu Lun Tse, Chia Jen Chang, Yu Len Huang
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(12): 5488.     CrossRef
  • Role of deep learning in early detection of COVID-19: Scoping review
    Mahmood Alzubaidi, Haider Dhia Zubaydi, Ali Abdulqader Bin-Salem, Alaa A Abd-Alrazaq, Arfan Ahmed, Mowafa Househ
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update.2021; 1: 100025.     CrossRef
  • Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping
    Kyle J. Lafata, Yuqi Wang, Brandon Konkel, Fang-Fang Yin, Mustafa R. Bashir
    Abdominal Radiology.2021; 47(9): 2986.     CrossRef
  • Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging With Deep Perceptual Autoencoders
    Nina Shvetsova, Bart Bakker, Irina Fedulova, Heinrich Schulz, Dmitry V. Dylov
    IEEE Access.2021; 9: 118571.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty
    Su Hun Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha, Geun Sung Song, Jun Seok Lee, Sang Weon Lee
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(5): 677.     CrossRef
  • Application of Hyperspectral Imaging for Maturity and Soluble Solids Content Determination of Strawberry With Deep Learning Approaches
    Zhenzhu Su, Chu Zhang, Tianying Yan, Jianan Zhu, Yulan Zeng, Xuanjun Lu, Pan Gao, Lei Feng, Linhai He, Lihui Fan
    Frontiers in Plant Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in medical imaging
    I B Abbasov
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series.2021; 2094(3): 032008.     CrossRef
  • A 3D deep learning approach to epicardial fat segmentation in non-contrast and post-contrast cardiac CT images
    Thanongchai Siriapisith, Worapan Kusakunniran, Peter Haddawy
    PeerJ Computer Science.2021; 7: e806.     CrossRef
  • Characterizing Hyperspectral Microscope Imagery for Classification of Blueberry Firmness with Deep Learning Methods
    Bosoon Park, Tae-Sung Shin, Jeong-Seok Cho, Jeong-Ho Lim, Ki-Jae Park
    Agronomy.2021; 12(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative AI-Driven Fluorescence Diagnosis of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
    Victoriya Andreeva, Evgeniia Aksamentova, Andrey Muhachev, Alexey Solovey, Igor Litvinov, Alexey Gusarov, Natalia N. Shevtsova, Dmitry Kushkin, Karina Litvinova
    Diagnostics.2021; 12(1): 72.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Approach for Analyzing the COVID-19 Chest X-Rays
    Mohini Manav, Monika Goyal, Anuj Kumar, A. K. Arya, Hari Singh, Arun Kumar Yadav
    Journal of Medical Physics.2021; 46(3): 189.     CrossRef
  • Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence Based Assessment of Maximum Intensity Projection Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images
    Mio Adachi, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Yuka Kikuchi, Wu Xiaotong, Jun Oyama, Koichiro Kimura, Goshi Oda, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Hiroyuki Uetake, Ukihide Tateishi
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(5): 330.     CrossRef
  • The use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in oncologic histopathology
    Ahmed S. Sultan, Mohamed A. Elgharib, Tiffany Tavares, Maryam Jessri, John R. Basile
    Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine.2020; 49(9): 849.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Deep-Learning and Conventional Machine-Learning Methods for the Automatic Recognition of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Areas from Ultrasound Images
    Raluca Brehar, Delia-Alexandrina Mitrea, Flaviu Vancea, Tiberiu Marita, Sergiu Nedevschi, Monica Lupsor-Platon, Magda Rotaru, Radu Ioan Badea
    Sensors.2020; 20(11): 3085.     CrossRef
  • Allosteric Regulation at the Crossroads of New Technologies: Multiscale Modeling, Networks, and Machine Learning
    Gennady M. Verkhivker, Steve Agajanian, Guang Hu, Peng Tao
    Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review
    Alice Segato, Aldo Marzullo, Francesco Calimeri, Elena De Momi
    APL Bioengineering.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep Convolutional Approaches for the Analysis of COVID-19 Using Chest X-Ray Images From Portable Devices
    Joaquim De Moura, Lucia Ramos Garcia, Placido Francisco Lizancos Vidal, Milena Cruz, Laura Abelairas Lopez, Eva Castro Lopez, Jorge Novo, Marcos Ortega
    IEEE Access.2020; 8: 195594.     CrossRef
  • Data Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analyses
    Mingyu Kim, Hyun-Jin Bae
    Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.2020; 81(6): 1290.     CrossRef
  • 27,852 View
  • 588 Download
  • 218 Web of Science
  • 212 Crossref