Objective To evaluate early postoperative mobility after lumbar decompression using real-time location system (RTLS)-derived objective metrics and to explore differences in mobility patterns between biportal endoscopic decompression and open decompression.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included 323 patients who underwent lumbar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis between March 2020 and May 2024. RTLS sensors embedded in wristbands continuously recorded patient mobility during postoperative days (PODs) 1–4. Primary RTLS-derived outcomes included total walking distance, mean walking speed, and active movement ratios (top 20% and top 50%). Between-group comparisons were performed using nonparametric tests. Propensity score matching and multivariable median quantile regression adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and preoperative mobility were conducted.
Results RTLS identified differences in early postoperative activity patterns between surgical approaches. In adjusted analyses, activity-intensity–based metrics, particularly the top 20% activity ratio, remained significantly higher in the biportal endoscopic decompression group across multiple PODs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated minimal differences after single-level decompression, whereas activity-based differences were more frequently observed in multilevel procedures.
Conclusion RTLS-based continuous monitoring detected differences in early postoperative activity patterns following lumbar decompression. These findings support the role of RTLS as an objective tool for assessing early functional recovery in spine surgery.
Objective Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has become a mainstay technique for interbody fusion, allowing for large contact area between implant and endplate, and providing increased stability and greater area for fusion. The development of 3-dimensional (3D)-expandable implants that provide multidimensional (3D) expansion has shown to provide better height restoration and clinical outcomes when compared to static implants. Comparison of the endplate coverage between 3D-expandable and static TLIF implants has yet to be studied. This study compares endplate coverage achieved with static TLIF, 3D-expandable TLIF, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) implants.
Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing interbody fusion with either static TLIF, 3D-expandable TLIF, or ALIF between the years 2014 and 2022 was conducted. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging was used to measure endplate and implant dimensions. 3D-expandable TLIF interbody device areas were calculated using diameter measurements on postoperative CT. The coverage ratio was defined as the ratio of twice the area of the implant and the sum of the superior and inferior endplate areas at the operative level.
Results A total of 53 patients per cohort were included. The average endplate coverage ratios for static TLIF, 3D-expandable TLIF, and ALIF implants were 0.19±0.04, 0.35±0.06, and 0.46±0.13, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed comparable coverage of 3D-expandable TLIF to ALIF implants at L3–4 and L4–5, while ALIF remained superior at L5–S1.
Conclusion 3D-expandable TLIF interbody devices provide greater endplate coverage when compared to static TLIF devices and approach comparable coverage to ALIF implants.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Commentary on “Radiographic Analysis of Endplate Coverage of a 3-Dimensional-Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Implant Compared to Static TLIF and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Implants” Kun Wang, Xiaofeng Lian Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 902. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the December 2025 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 877. CrossRef
Objective Lesions of the ventral craniovertebral junction are difficult to access owing to their deep location and proximity to critical neurovascular and pharyngeal structures. In this study, we aimed to describe the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions and highlight key considerations regarding approach selection, airway management, and occipitocervical stabilization.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed 7 patients who underwent the endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions. The analysis included preoperative planning for surgical access, intraoperative technique, postoperative management, airway and nutritional strategies, and the need for occipitocervical fixation. One representative case is presented to illustrate key technical steps.
Results Of the 7 patients, 6 had neoplastic lesions and 1 had basilar invagination. Despite a relatively large mean lesion size of 39.4 mm, subtotal or greater resection was achieved in 5 of the 6 tumor cases. Occipitocervical fixation was performed in 2 cases. Two patients underwent prophylactic tracheostomy because of anticipated airway compromise. Of the 5 orally intubated cases, 3 were extubated immediately and 2 by postoperative day 2. Oral feeding resumed by day 10 in 6 cases. No postoperative infections or cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred. One patient experienced transient velopharyngeal insufficiency, which resolved spontaneously.
Conclusion The endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach is a safe and effective option for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions when appropriately selected. Careful preoperative evaluation and individualized management of airway and spinal stability are essential for favorable outcomes.
Objective Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery is a minimally invasive technique that uses continuous irrigation to improve visualization and control bleeding. Effective water pressure management is crucial for patient safety, particularly at the cervical and thoracic levels where spinal cord injury risk is higher. However, real-time pressure monitoring remains underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of real-time water pressure monitoring on safety during UBE surgery.
Methods A prospective study was conducted involving 20 patients undergoing UBE lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the irrigation system: gravity-based or infusion pump. Real-time water pressure was monitored using a digital sensor throughout surgery. Each procedure was categorized into 3 phases: phase I, working space preparation; phase II, laminectomy; phase III, flavectomy, dura exposure, and discectomy. Data was analyzed according to the type of irrigation system and surgical phase.
Results The mean water pressure in the surgical field during UBE spine surgery was 17.98± 8.07 mmHg, with no significant differences between surgical phases. However, the infusion pump system maintained significantly lower mean pressure (12.10±3.51 mmHg) compared to the gravity-based system (23.86±6.97 mmHg, p=0.001). The infusion pump system consistently maintained a significantly lower mean water pressure compared to the gravity-based system.
Conclusion Real-time water pressure monitoring during UBE surgery enhances safety by enabling improved control of pressure within the surgical field. Both the gravity-based and infusion pump systems safely maintained working space pressure, with the pump system showing significantly lower pressure levels.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Case Report: Spinal epidural lipomatosis with incomplete cauda equina syndrome treated with unilateral biportal endoscopic technique Zaiyin Deng, Yujin Wang, Mohammed Saud Shaik, Duanyang Li, Rongjing Di, Zhourui Wu, Bin Ma Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidemiology of spinal cord hypertension syndrome in water-mediated uniportal full endoscopic thoracolumbar surgery: a single-center experience Haiyang Wu, Luyang Wang, Yiping Zheng, Xizhong Zhu, Wanqi Ren, Ziheng Li, Shoule Ma, Mingwang Zhao, Xingchen Li, Yusheng Xu European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Metastatic spine disease represents a growing therapeutic challenge that demands a balance between incorporating emerging technologies while respecting the fundamental principles during clinical decision-making. Advances in adjuvant therapies, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy, have significantly improved long-term patient survival. Surgical decision-making should be guided by well-established frameworks such as the NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, systemic) criteria, the ESCC (epidural spinal cord compression) scale, and the SINS (spinal instability neoplastic score), ensuring a structured and evidence-based approach to treatment. The integration of minimally invasive techniques, including percutaneous instrumentation, ablation techniques, and biportal endoscopic approaches, has reduced surgical morbidity and facilitated faster recovery. Additionally, carbon fiber implants are revolutionizing spinal stabilization by allowing better postoperative visualization of any local recurrence and easier radiation planning. SBRT has emerged as a critical modality, offering precise, high-dose radiation with minimal toxicity to the spinal cord, improving local tumor control and patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach remains paramount, requiring collaboration between spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of metastatic spine tumor management, focusing on: (1) fundamentals of metastatic spine care, (2) minimally invasive surgical techniques, (3) the use of carbon fiber screws, (4) SBRT, and (5) ways to maximize patient safety.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Neoplastic Cauda Equina Syndrome: When Do We Not Operate? Harsh Jain, Advith Sarikonda, Tamia Potter, Campbell Liles, Robert J. Dambrino, Ryan Whitaker, Scott L. Zuckerman Neurosurgery Practice.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Mazda Farshad, Jana Felicitas Schader, Alexandra Stauffer, Carl Moritz Zipser, Najmeh Kheram, José Miguel Spirig, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Vincent Hagel
Neurospine 2025;22(2):583-591. Published online June 30, 2025
Objective Endoscopic spine surgery implies possibly severe complications of the central nervous system, from headache to seizures and autonomic dysreflexia. These adverse events might be due to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), presumably induced by increased spinal intra-/epidural pressure caused by fluid irrigation. This study was designed to perform interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) at different irrigation fluid settings while monitoring its effect on intra-/epidural and ICPs, with and without dural tears.
Methods Spinal intradural pressures were measured by introducing catheters through a sacral approach to human cadavers’ lumbar, thoracic, and cervical levels. Additionally, an epidural probe was placed at L3–4. ICP was measured by an intraventricular probe. IELD was performed at L3–4, and the effect of varying irrigation pressures by different endoscopic pump systems and gravity-based irrigation on intra-/epidural and ICP pressures was measured before and after durotomy at L3–4.
Results Intradural pressure at L3–4 correlated linearly with increasing irrigation pressure, irrespective of the used pump system (median pressure increase at 100-mmHg irrigation pressure: system I: 7 mmHg, r=0.94, p=0.002; system II: 7 mmHg, r=0.89, p=0.017) or gravity (8 mmHg, r=0.93, p=0.242). This effect was also seen intradurally at the thoracic/cervical spine, epidural, and intracranial level, and was even more pronounced with the maneuver of outflow-occlusion and a dural tear present.
Conclusion While performing IELD, pump pressures correlated linearly to intra-/epidural pressures and ICPs. Pressures did not rise to concerningly high levels without outflow-occlusion, even with increased pump pressures. In the presence of a dural tear, higher pump pressures exacerbated by occlusion may lead to deleterious intradural and ICP elevations.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Biportal endoscopic foraminotomy of the L7–S1 neuroforamen in dogs: Description of surgical technique and ex vivo comparison with conventional open dorsolateral foraminotomy Dimitrios Bekiaridis, Antonio Pozzi, Frank Steffen, Julian Guevar, Lucas A. Smolders Veterinary Surgery.2026; 55(4): 837. CrossRef
A Protocol to Preserve the Dural Safety Margin During Simultaneous Hybrid Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Cervical Laminoplasty Karson Tam, H.Y. Li, H.K. Lo, W.L. Kam World Neurosurgery.2026; 209: 124877. CrossRef
Epidemiology of spinal cord hypertension syndrome in water-mediated uniportal full endoscopic thoracolumbar surgery: a single-center experience Haiyang Wu, Luyang Wang, Yiping Zheng, Xizhong Zhu, Wanqi Ren, Ziheng Li, Shoule Ma, Mingwang Zhao, Xingchen Li, Yusheng Xu European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Validation of the VIEW score: a novel intraoperative grading scale for visualization in endoscopic spine surgery Vit Kotheeranurak, Surachat Jaroenwareekul, Jin-Sung Kim, Christoph Siepe, Don Young Park, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Preliminary Report of Full-Endoscopic Spinal Dural Repair Using Double-Arm Sutures With a Biportal Endoscopic System: Technical Note and Feasibility Evaluation in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model Kuo-Hua Chao, Chiu-Ming Chen, Jui-Jung Yang Operative Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) using biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) in patients with central canal stenosis, with and without low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 170 patients who underwent BESS-ULBD between 2015 and 2018, with at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group A (68 patients) with central stenosis and low-grade DLS and group B (102 patients) with central stenosis alone. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Modified MacNab criteria. Radiological assessments included sagittal translation measurements on dynamic flexion-extension radiographs.
Results Both groups significantly improved clinical outcomes at the final follow-up (p<0.05). Group A’s mean VAS scores improved from 3.8±2.4 to 1.9±2.0 for back pain and from 6.4±1.8 to 2.3±2.0 for leg pain. In group B, back pain improved from 3.9±2.5 to 1.7±1.9, and leg pain from 6.6±2.0 to 2.2±2.2. ODI scores also improved significantly in both groups. Radiological evaluation showed no significant changes in sagittal translation postoperatively, indicating preserved spinal stability. Both groups had comparable clinical outcomes, with no major complications reported.
Conclusion BESS-ULBD is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for managing central canal stenosis, with or without low-grade DLS. This technique provides substantial symptom relief, preserves spinal stability, and presents a promising alternative to more invasive fusion procedures in carefully selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Future Directions in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Parikshit Juvekar, Susan Christopher, Zoher Ghogawala Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2026; 37(1): 143. CrossRef
A Commentary on “International Practice Patterns in the Surgical Management of Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation: An AO Spine Cross-Sectional Study” Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2026; 23(1): 40. CrossRef
Response to the letter to the editor: Inconsistencies in obesity criteria: implications for systematic reviews on endoscopic spine surgery Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Peem Sarasombath, Yudha Mathan Sakti, Pang Hung Wu, Meng-Huang Wu, Yu-Jen Lu, Lo Cho Yau, Zenya Ito, Sung Tan Cho, Dong-Gune Chang, Kang Taek Lim Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(1): 211. CrossRef
Targeted Decompression Under Local Anesthesia versus Extensive Decompression Under General Anesthesia for Octogenarians with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Hang Zhang, Huili Cai, Yunzhong Cheng, Xuelin Li, Yang Liu, Fengping Liu, Jingchuan Sun, Haidan Chen Clinical Interventions in Aging.2026; Volume 21: 1. CrossRef
Advancing Endoscopic Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis – A Commentary on “Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis” Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 566. CrossRef
Trends in Utilization and Cost of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression in Ambulatory Surgical Centers: A Nationwide Database Analysis From 2018 Through 2022 Mitchell K. Ng, Paul G. Mastrokostas, Leonidas E. Mastrokostas, Aaron B. Lavi, Luke B. Schwartz, Yasmine K. Eichbaum, Yulia Lee, Morgan Hitchner, William Green, Gregorio Baek, Joshua Mathew, Jonathan Dalton, Alec Giakas, Rajendra Singh, Afshin E. Razi, Ia Global Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of navigation-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided UBE-ULBD in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study Shi-Jie Liu, Si-Yuan Yao, Yao Zhang, Wan-Cheng lin, Li-Xiang Ding, Ji-Peng Song BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures presenting with neurological deficits treated with endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (endoscopic minimally invasive surgery, EMIS) or conventional open surgery (OS).
Methods Data of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits who were treated with EMIS or OS between June 2019 and July 2021 were extracted from the electronic database. Various clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts.
Results Among the 231 patients who were followed up for more than 2 years, 107 were in the EMIS cohort and 124 were in the OS cohort. Compared with the OS cohort, the EMIS cohort had longer operative time (p<0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospital stay were significantly reduced (p<0.05). At both postoperative and final follow-up assessments, the EMIS cohort demonstrated significantly better visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes compared to the OS cohort (p<0.05). Both cohorts maintained similar correction of spinal canal erosion rate, percentage of anterior vertebral height and sagittal Cobb angle after surgery and at the last follow-up (p>0.05). According to American Spinal Injury Association classification, the 2 cohorts had similar neurological recovery at the last follow-up (p>0.05).
Conclusion In comparison to OS, EMIS treatment for AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits has shown comparable clinical efficacy while significantly reducing surgical trauma.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support Feifei Jin, Shu li, Xuemin Zhang, Wei Huang, Jing Zhou, Zhongdi Liu, Pan Hu, Yanqiu Wu, Zixiao Zhang, Lijun Hou, Xiangjun Bai, Tianbing Wang Medical Review.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Tomoyuki Asada, Eric R. Zhao, Adin M. Ehrlich, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Sereen Halayqeh, Tarek Harhash, Olivia C. Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Todd J. Albert, James Farmer, Russel C. Huang, Harvinder Sandhu, Han Jo Kim, Francis C. Lovecchio, James E. Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
Neurospine 2025;22(1):3-13. Published online March 31, 2025
Objective While minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has shown superiority in key clinical metrics over the open approach, evidence regarding patient-reported outcomes remains limited. This study compared postoperative recovery trajectories and symptomatic improvement phases between MIS and open TLIF.
Methods This retrospective review included patients who underwent single-level MIS or open TLIF. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Segmented regression analysis with mixed-effects modeling, allowing for identification of distinct recovery phases, compared symptomatic trends between approaches.
Results Of 324 patients (268 MIS, 56 open), baseline demographics were similar except for greater preoperative leg pain in the MIS group (NRS: 6.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.027). A segmented regression model identified 4 ODI recovery phases: postoperative disability phase (PDP, day 0 to 13), early improvement phase (day 13 to 28), late improvement phase (day 28 to 110), and plateau phase (later than day 110). The MIS group exhibited significantly lower disability exacerbation during PDP (β = 0.93 vs. 1.42 points per day, p = 0.008). Additionally, the plateau of NRS back occurred significantly earlier in the MIS group than in the open group (MIS, 26.7 ± 2.6 days vs. open, 51.7 ± 6.6 days, p < 0.001).
Conclusion MIS-TLIF resulted in lower postoperative disability during the first 2 weeks compared to the open approach. Furthermore, low back pain achieved an earlier plateau in back pain by about 4 weeks in the MIS approach.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Multifidus Muscle Atrophy Predicts Spinal Cage Subsidence After Lumbar Fusion Cong Zhang, Chengming Li, Xiaotao Wu, Xiaozhi Sun Journal of Pain Research.2026; Volume 19: 1. CrossRef
Biomaterials and Noncoding RNA: The “Repair‐Alliance” Perspective in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Chen Liu, Zhengguang Li, Yongbo Zhang, Tianyi Ji, Hua Sun, Gen Wei, Liang Zhang, Juqun Xi Advanced Healthcare Materials.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Integrated Health State Suggests Lower Cumulative Neck Pain–Related Disability After Cervical Disk Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Tomoyuki Asada, Adin M. Ehrlich, Sereen Halayqeh, Eric R. Zhao, Adrian T. H. Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Austin C. Kaidi, Kasra Araghi, Vishaal Nayagam, Roger Freeman, Olivia C. Tuma, Tarek Harhash, Harvinder S. Sandhu, Todd J. Albert, Han Jo Kim, James C. Farmer, Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of low-dose Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Tae Hoon Kang, Jeongwoon Han, Minjoon Cho, Jae Hyup Lee European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective Full endoscopic cervical surgery (FECS) is an evolving minimally invasive approach for treating cervical spine disorders. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on the clinical outcomes and patient perspectives associated with FECS, specifically evaluating its safety, efficacy, and overall patient satisfaction.
Methods A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published between January 2000 and September 2024 that reported on clinical outcomes or patient perspectives related to FECS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) tool and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective studies, and observational studies focused on adult populations undergoing FECS for cervical spine surgery.
Results The final synthesis included 30 studies. FECS was associated with significant reductions in both cervical and radicular pain, as well as meaningful functional improvements, measured by standardized clinical scales such as the Neck Disability Index and visual analogue scale. Patient satisfaction rates were consistently high, with most studies reporting satisfaction exceeding 85%. Complication rates were low, primarily involving transient neurological deficits that were typically resolved without the need for further intervention. Nonrandomized studies generally presented a moderate risk of bias due to confounding and selection, whereas randomized controlled trials exhibited a low risk of bias.
Conclusion FECS is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical option for cervical spine disorders associated with substantial pain relief, functional improvement and high levels of patient satisfaction.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Response to the letter to the editor: Inconsistencies in obesity criteria: implications for systematic reviews on endoscopic spine surgery Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Peem Sarasombath, Yudha Mathan Sakti, Pang Hung Wu, Meng-Huang Wu, Yu-Jen Lu, Lo Cho Yau, Zenya Ito, Sung Tan Cho, Dong-Gune Chang, Kang Taek Lim Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(1): 211. CrossRef
Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy for Cervical Disc Hernia With Unilateral Radiculopathy Idris Gurpinar, Mehmet Yigit Akgun, Furkan Almas, Ozkan Ates Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 149. CrossRef
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390. CrossRef
Navigated Minimally Invasive Cervical and Cervicothoracic Fixation: A Technical Note on Surgical Technique and Proposed Classification Spyridon Komaitis, Konstantinos Zygogiannis, Sotirios Karatzoglou, Dimitrios Klitsinikos, Dritan Pasku, Khalid Salem Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Luca Ambrosio, Sathish Muthu, Samuel K. Cho, Micheal S. Virk, Juan P. Cabrera, Patrick C. Hsieh, Andreas K. Demetriades, Stipe Ćorluka, S. Tim Yoon, Gianluca Vadalà, AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
Neurospine 2025;22(1):40-47. Published online March 31, 2025
Objective This study aims to assess global trends in the use of open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of single-level L4–5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods A cross-sectional online survey issued by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative was conducted among AO Spine members between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with 3 clinical cases of L4–5 grade 1 DLS, each with varying degrees of stenosis and instability. The survey captured surgeon demographics and preferences for open versus MIS approaches. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, was performed to explore associations between surgical choices and surgeon demographics.
Results A total of 943 surgeons responded, with 479 completing the survey. Open surgery was the preferred approach in all 3 cases (58.8%, 57.3%, and 42.4%, respectively), particularly in cases involving central and bilateral foraminal stenosis. MIS was the second most common choice, particularly for unilateral foraminal stenosis with mild instability (38.8%). Surgeons’ preferences varied significantly by region, age, and fellowship training, with younger and fellowship-trained surgeons more likely to prefer MIS.
Conclusion The study highlights the continued predominance of open surgery for DLS, especially in complex cases, despite the growing acceptance of MIS. Significant regional and demographic variations in surgical preferences suggest the need for tailored guidelines and standardized training protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term efficacy of these approaches and the impact of evolving technologies on surgical decision-making.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Minimally Invasive Options for Spondylolisthesis Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2026; 37(1): 39. CrossRef
Long-term comparative study of Open-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and UBE-TLIF in single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis Jian Luo, Lihua Shen, Changshen Bao, Zhichao Gao European Journal of Medical Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390. CrossRef
Objective This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system in assisting transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent TELD for LDH at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from November 2022 to December 2023. Patients treated with the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system were defined as the navigation-guided TELD (Ng-TELD) group (30 cases), while those treated with the conventional x-ray fluoroscopy method were defined as the control group (31 cases). Record and compare baseline characteristics, surgical parameters, efficacy indicators, and adverse events between the 2 patient groups.
Results The average follow-up duration for the 61 patients was 11.8 months. Postoperatively, both groups exhibited significant relief from back and leg pain, which continued to improve over time. At the final follow-up, patients’ lumbar function and quality of life had significantly improved compared to preoperative levels (p < 0.05). The Ng-TELD group had significantly shorter total operation time (58.43 ± 12.37 minutes vs. 83.23 ± 25.90 minutes), catheter placement time (5.83 ± 1.09 minutes vs. 15.94 ± 3.00 minutes), decompression time (47.17 ± 11.98 minutes vs. 67.29 ± 24.23 minutes), and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies (3.20 ± 1.45 vs. 16.58 ± 4.25) compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of efficacy evaluation indicators and hospital stay. At the final follow-up, the excellent and good rate of surgical outcomes assessed by the MacNab criteria was 98.4%, and the overall adverse event rate was 8.2%, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion This study demonstrates that the integrated optical and magnetic surgical navigation system can reduce the complexity of TELD, shorten operation time, and minimize radiation exposure for the surgeon, highlighting its promising clinical potential.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A retrospective Chinese study on optical–electromagnetic navigation-guided biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: improving precision and efficiency Xingchen Yao, Junpeng Liu, Li Guan, Jincai Yang, Aixing Pan, Yong Hai Asian Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Review of the Surgical Techniques, Indications and Anatomical Considerations Stylianos Kapetanakis, Mikail Chatzivasiliadis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis, Konstantinos Pazarlis Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(24): 8961. CrossRef
This video presents a case of L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis treated with full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF), emphasizing the GUARD (Glider Used as a Rotary Device) technique for nerve root protection. This innovative approach involves controlled rotation of the cage glider before cage insertion to minimize the risk of nerve root injury, a significant complication in Endo-TLIF procedures. The GUARD technique, validated in previous cadaveric studies, provides enhanced safety during cage insertion by protecting the nerve root. A 48-year-old woman with a 3-year history of progressive low back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (right-sided predominance) was diagnosed with L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. After failure of conservative management, she underwent uniportal full-endoscopic facet-resecting transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the GUARD technique. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant symptomatic improvement and resolution of radiculopathy, without any intraoperative nerve root injury or postoperative neurological deficits. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of the GUARD technique in reducing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cage design-centric glider approach to full-endoscopic lumbar fusion: optimizing nerve root protection in facet-sparing and facet-resecting techniques Yu-Chia Hsu, Hao-Chun Chuang, Yuan-Fu Liu, Chao-Jui Chang, Yu-Meng Hsiao, Yi-Hung Huang, Keng-Chang Liu, Chien-Min Chen, Hyeun-Sung Kim, Cheng-Li Lin Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(2): 343. CrossRef
Innovative method for efficient placement of a working cannula in uniportal transarticular full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: transarticular trephonic plasty (TTP) Wei Jiao, Wen Yin, Xilong Cui, Wei Wang, Yukai Cui, Xiaohao Sun, Tao Sun, Junyou Hu, Jianqiang Zhang, Haiyang Yu BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic-Assisted Uniportal Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note on a Hybrid Form of Minimally Invasive Surgery Ting Yao Ang, A. Aravin Kumar, Chin Hong Ngai, John J.Y. Zhang, Jacob Y.L. Oh, Ji Min Ling, Thomas C.H. Tan Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 105. CrossRef
Exoscopic Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Technical Considerations and Clinical Outcomes During the Early Learning Curve Kentaro Yamane, Shinichiro Takao, Kanji Sasaki, Wataru Narita, Hisakazu Shitozawa, Kazuhiro Takeuchi, Shinnosuke Nakahara Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(9): 3516. CrossRef
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Double-Cage Full Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion : A Retrospective Cohort Study Chi Ho Kim, Pius Kim, Chang Il Ju, Jong Hun Seo Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
This case report and video demonstrate the technique of full-endoscopic J-shaped transforaminal L5 exiting nerve decompression in Bertolotti syndrome. Bertolotti syndrome, characterized by a congenital lumbosacral transitional vertebra, often results in mechanical lower back pain and nerve root compression. A 69-year-old male presented with progressive radiating pain in the right leg and tingling in the L5 dermatome. Lumbar spine MRI revealed a right foraminal disc herniation at the L5–S1 level, with calcification and foraminal stenosis. The patient was also diagnosed with Castellvi type I Bertolotti syndrome, featuring a large L5 transverse process and a high iliac crest. These anatomical variations complicated the transforaminal approach, creating a narrow safety zone for conventional methods. The approach began with docking on the L5 transverse process. Endoscopic drilling was performed in a J-shaped configuration to partially resect the transverse process and alar wing, facilitating endoscope insertion into Kambin’s triangle. Foraminal decompression was achieved by removing the tip of the superior articular process (SAP), thereby decompressing the L5 exiting nerve root. Full-endoscopic spine surgery offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional open techniques for L5 nerve decompression in Bertolotti syndrome. This video presentation illustrates the intraoperative endoscopic approach, detailing the decompression techniques and highlighting the minimally invasive advantages of this method.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
L5–S1 Anatomic Features Relevant to Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion: A Cadaveric and Imaging-Based Study Miguel Relvas-Silva, André Rodrigues Pinho, Vitorino Veludo, Daniel Medina-Dias, António Pereira Rodrigues, Hélio Alves, Maria Dulce Madeira, Pedro Alberto Pereira Diagnostics.2026; 16(4): 610. CrossRef
A comparative study of the far lateral approach of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for L5/S1 foraminal stenosis with high iliac crest: a retrospective cohort study Jie Zhang, Xuanwen Liu, En Song, Dan Chen, Hongda Zhou, Qin Luo International Orthopaedics.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery for the Treatment of Far-out Syndrome: A Case Series Ryuichi WATANABE, Ryoji TOMINAGA, Kento TAKEBAYASHI, Yasushi OSHIMA, Hiroki IWAI, Hisashi KOGA Neurologia medico-chirurgica.2025; 65(12): 583. CrossRef
The main objective of this case and video is to demonstrate the surgical technique of navigated full-endoscopic decompression and sequestrectomy at the C7–T1 level to alleviate C8 nerve root compression and manage cervicobrachialgia. Cervicobrachialgia resulting from C7–T1 disc herniation is a quite rare yet painful condition that can significantly impair motor function in the upper limb. Traditionally, open surgeries can be invasive, with prolonged recovery times and/or fusion of the level with adjacent segment disease. Posterior full-endoscopic approach offers a minimally invasive alternative that allows for quicker recovery, less postoperative pain, and improved outcomes. By preserving motion, it also prevents adjacent segment disease. A 72-year-old female presented with sudden-onset cervicobrachial pain radiating to the ulnar side of the right arm, coupled with paresthesia and weakness of the flexors/interosseous muscles (Medical Research Council=M3). Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a large right-sided C7–T1 disc herniation compressing the C8 nerve root. A full-endoscopic C7–T1 posterior foraminotomy and sequestrectomy was performed with navigation. The patient experienced immediate relief from pain and improved motor function in the right hand postoperatively. Posterior full-endoscopic foraminotomy and sequestrectomy of the C7–T1 disc herniation is effective for treating cervicobrachialgia due to C8 nerve compression. The minimally invasive approach demonstrated in this video highlights the technique and stresses the advantage of navigation in the lower cervical spine.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for cervicothoracic junction disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial Huaibin Wang, Hui Li, Rushuo Wei, Hao Yan, Ruzhan Yao, Weiqiang Liu, Ling Li Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Técnica endoscópica interlaminar asistida por navegación para hernia discal C7-T1: abordaje mínimamente invasivo de la unión cervicotorácica. Reporte de caso José Carlos Sauri-Barraza, Eduardo Callejas-Ponce, Jorge Daniel Pérez-Ruiz, Luis Enrique Núñez-Alvarado, Luis Alfonso Castillejo-Adalid, Francisco García-Muñoz, Omar Castillejo-Adalid, Adrián Francisco Méndez-Delgado Cirugía de Columna.2026; 4(3): 252. CrossRef
First
Prev
