Objective We aimed to comprehensively compare surgical methods for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) using systematic review and network meta-analysis to understand their effectiveness and outcomes, as current research provides limited overviews.
Methods We followed PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, preregistering our protocol with PROSPERO. We analyzed Englishpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with OVCFs that evaluated pain intensity or functionality using tools like visual analogue scale (VAS) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Exclusions included non-RCTs, malignancy-related fractures, and certain interventions. Using the RoB 2 tool, we assessed bias and visualized results with Robvis. Our primary outcome was pain intensity, with secondary outcomes including disability, new fractures, and cement leakage. Results were synthesized using Stata/MP.
Results Thirty-four RCTs from 10 countries, totaling 4,384 patients, were analyzed. Shortterm VAS indicated kyphoplasty with facet joint injection (KIJ) as the top treatment at 87.7%, while unipedicular kyphoplasty (UKP) led to long-term at 74.9%. Short-term ODI favored vertebroplasty with facet joint injection (VIJ) at 98.4%, with kyphoplasty (KP) leading longterm at 66.0%. All surgical techniques were superior to conservative treatment. Vertebral augmentation devices reported the fewest new fractures and curved vertebroplasty had the least cement leakage. SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking) analyses suggested UKP and VIJ as top choices for postoperative pain relief, with VIJ excelling in postoperative disability improvement.
Conclusion Our analysis evaluates 12 OVCF interventions, underscoring KIJ for short-term pain relief and VIJ and UKP for long-term efficacy. Notably, VIJ stands out in disability outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive OVCF management.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures Martin Bibza, Michal Božík, Mário Malina, Boris Šteňo Clinical Osteology.2026; 31(1): 55. CrossRef
Predicting long-term clinical mortality of elderly patients with vertebral compression fractures Shuofan Wang, Kaiwen Peng, Kaili Peng, Zhichao Gao Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The bisegmental Cobb angle in osteoporotic spine fractures: Does it influence treatment decision or functional outcome? Philipp Schenk, Bernhard W. Ullrich, Felix C. Kohler, Falko Schwarz, Klaus J. Schnake, Michael A. Scherer, Gregor Schmeiser, Katja Liepold, Marion Riehle, Michael Müller, Martin Bäumlein, Sebastian Katscher, Max J. Scheyerer, Georg Osterhoff, Kai Sprengel Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106099. CrossRef
Restoration of Sagittal Alignment and Pulmonary Function With Percutaneous Vertebral Body Augmentation for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review Hanne H Jørgensen, Mikkel Ø Andersen, Tove F Frandsen, Line A Wickstrøm, Benjamin Kostic, Leah Y Carreon Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: A Nationwide Analysis of Infection Rates and Antibiotic Use in South Korea Youngjin Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Sukil Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Joonghyun Ahn, So-Young Han, Hyung-Youl Park Antibiotics.2025; 14(9): 901. CrossRef
Spinal Subdural Hematoma After Kyphoplasty in a Patient on Warfarin: A Case Report and Literature Review Ho-Young Jung, Jun-Seok Lee, Geon-U Kim, Hyung-Youl Park Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery.2025; 15(1): 38. CrossRef
SPINAL DISORDER DIAGNOSIS BASED ON DEEP LEARNING INTEGRATING BIOMECHANICAL DATA HUI-JUAN WAN, TENG-TENG ZHANG, JIN-XIN ZHENG, BING-BING WANG, YONG-JUN CHEN Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Treatment Using Biportal Endoscopic Decompression with Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in Older Adult Patients Sang-Min Park, Sang-Soo Na, Ho-Joong Kim, Jin S. Yeom Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2025; 17(5): 836. CrossRef
Interleukin Concentrations in Bone Marrow Fluid and MRI Prognostic Findings in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Yasuhiro Nakajima, Akinori Kageyama, Yasukazu Hijikata, Ayako Motomura, Takashi Tsujiuchi, Koji Osuka Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Osteoporosis en columna vertebral Barón Zárate Kalfópulos, Irving Omar Estévez-García Investigación en Discapacidad.2025; 11(2): 41. CrossRef
A retrospective study identifying the primary source of hidden blood loss during vertebroplasty Yuanhao Wang, Ting Zhao, Cong Chen, Baoshan Xu Medicine.2025; 104(42): e45213. CrossRef
The Use of Polymethylmethacrylate Cement in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Management: How to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Corrado Ciatti, Chiara Asti, Pietro Maniscalco, Michelangelo Rinaldi, Gianfranco Pirellas, Gianfilippo Caggiari, Francesco Pisanu, Angelino Sanna, Carlo Doria Medicina.2025; 61(11): 2004. CrossRef
Influence of thoracolumbar kyphotic Cobb angle on prognosis after PKP surgery Peng Yuan, Xiang Ge, Qiang Shi, Yifan Wu, Zhen Yu Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary on “Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs” Chao-Hung Kuo Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 44. CrossRef
Clinical Oversight and Delayed Diagnosis of a Pathological Compression Fracture Causing Paraplegia Yin-Sheng Chen, Ping-Chuan Liu, Chih-Chang Chang, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Chao-Hung Kuo Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical significance of modified unilateral puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by 3D- printed guides in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective study Tao Gao, Sheng-Yu Wan, Zhi-Yu Chen, Tao Li, Xu Lin, Hai-Gang Hu, Jian-Dong Tang, Chao Wu BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Validity and reliability of the osteoporotic fracture treatment score (OF score) and outcomes across various treatments in osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture patients Korawish Mekariya, Borriwat Santipas, Harit Khamnurak, Wilasinee Sirichativapee, Ekkapoj Korwutthikulrangsri, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Werasak Sutipornpalangkul Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective We aimed to identify the most effective clinical treatment method for sacroiliac joint (SIJ)-related pain based on the systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of clinical interventions for sacroiliac joint pain by pooling the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods Our team conducted a systematic review and NMA of RCTs to determine the most effective clinical treatment for SIJ-related pain. We searched the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for RCTs until February 2023. The PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model.
Results Based on the search strategy and inclusion criteria, our systematic review and NMA included 9 randomized studies with 652 participants. Research has mainly focused on various radiofrequency sources, but their number is still low. In the network analysis, according to the NMA and mean ranking probabilities for the improvement of pain intensity (PI) and quality of life (QoL), sacroiliac joint fusion and cooled radiofrequency were associated with high treatment rank for improving PI and QoL in patients with sacroiliac joint pain.
Conclusion This NMA suggest that SIJ fusion and cooled radiofrequency could be potential options for improving the QoL and relieving pain in patients with SIJ-related pain. Comparison studies of outcomes between these 2 procedures with solid methodology and a low risk of bias would be very beneficial to identify the optimal treatment option for this challenging disease.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Interventional treatments for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Ji-Hoon Park, Jae Ni Jang, Soyoon Park, Young-Soon Choi, Rakib Miah, Sukhee Park Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.2026; : rapm-2026-107633. CrossRef
Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial Peter V Giannoudis, Paul Andrzejwski, George Chloros, Elizabeth M A Hensor British Medical Bulletin.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the Technical Specifications and Clinical Performance of Different Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty Catheters Ji Young Jang, Songrit Vuttipongkul, Dong Soon Jang, Min Cheol Chang Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 465. CrossRef
Advances in Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR Genome Editing for Spinal Pain Management Chan Young Kang, Kyung Wook Been, Myoung-Hee Kang, Myung Su Choi, Rae Hee Kang, Junseok W. Hur, Junho K. Hur Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 421. CrossRef
Effectiveness of a Facet Joint Block Versus a Medial Branch Block in Spinal Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sung Hyeon Noh, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Je Hwi Yun, Pyung Goo Cho, Sang Hyun Kim Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 441. CrossRef
Identifying S3 and S2 as Key Pain-Sensitive Targets in High-Frequency Ultrasound Therapy for Sacroiliitis Itay Goor-Aryeh, Paz Kelmer, Ruth Gur, Tal Harel, Roee Sheinfeld, Oded Jacobi, Lior Ungar Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(23): 8314. CrossRef
A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Different Topping-off Devices and Their Influence on the Sacroiliac Joint Following Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery Wei Fan, Song Yang, Jie Chen, Li-Xin Guo, Ming Zhang Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 244. CrossRef
Failed back surgery syndrome—terminology, etiology, prevention, evaluation, and management: a narrative review Jinseok Yeo Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2024; 41(3): 166. CrossRef
Sacroiliac joint pain: what treatment and when Federico Cocconi, Nicola Maffulli, Andreas Bell, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Filippo Migliorini Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2024; 24(11): 1055. CrossRef
First
Prev
