Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

2
results for

"Pain management"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Pain management"

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Narrative Review on Postoperative Pain Management Following Spine Surgery
Neurospine. 2025;22(2):403-420.   Published online June 30, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Narrative Review on Postoperative Pain Management Following Spine Surgery
Neurospine. 2025;22(2):403-420.   Published online June 30, 2025
Close
Postoperative pain is an inevitable consequence of spine surgery, yet there remains no universal consensus on the optimal pain management strategy. The complexity of spine procedures, coupled with patient variability, necessitates a multifaceted approach to pain control. Over time, numerous strategies have emerged, each with varying levels of effectiveness. Pharmacological approaches, including multimodal analgesia, local anesthetic infusions, and gabapentinoids, provide relief for both acute and chronic pain. Additionally, perioperative strategies such as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated benefits in optimizing pain control and recovery outcomes. Beyond pharmacological interventions, physical therapy has become a cornerstone of postoperative pain management, aiding in functional recovery and reducing reliance on medications. For patients with refractory or chronic pain, neuromodulatory techniques such as spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal injections offer alternative solutions. Despite the breadth of evidence-based strategies available, limitations persist, including opioid dependence, the complexity of multimodal regimens leading to suboptimal compliance, and cases of refractory pain. These challenges underscore the importance of tailoring pain management approaches to individual patient needs, ensuring a balance between effectiveness and safety. This narrative review of evidence seeks to explore the multifaceted nature of pain management following spine surgery, highlighting the challenges and evolving strategies in optimizing patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • ERAS-guided matrix nursing pathway targeting risk factors in spine surgery: development and prospective evaluation
    Yanlan Ma, Jin Zhao, Jing Peng
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ropivacaine-Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine-Magnesium Sulfate in TAP Block: A Randomized Study of Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries
    Shah Mehndi Masih, Shashi Shekhar, Gurmukh Prasad
    International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research.2026; : 48.     CrossRef
  • Extracellular Vesicle-Based Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: A State-of-the-Art Review on Diagnostic and Prognostic Advances
    Trung Nhan Vo, Hae Eun Shin, Yeji Kim, Inbo Han
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2026; 27(4): 2079.     CrossRef
  • Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in vertebral surgery: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis and meta-regression
    Burhan Dost, Esra Turunc, Yunus Emre Karapinar, Muzeyyen Beldagli, Engin Ihsan Turan, Hilal Dokmeci, Alessandro De Cassai
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2026; 111: 112184.     CrossRef
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration and Postoperative Pain Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Shi-Jing Zhang, Xin Lu, Tian-Xiao Liu, Qing Liu, Yu-Bo Xie
    Journal of Pain Research.2026; Volume 19: 1.     CrossRef
  • Spinal cord stimulation versus medical therapy for post-laminectomy syndrome: Two- and five-year risks of systemic morbidity, reoperation, and death
    Muaz Wahid, Zuhair Zaidi, Syed Murtaza Kazmi, Sameer Sajjad, Yousef Alshaikhsalama, Isa Faghihi, Salah G. Aoun
    Journal of Orthopaedic Reports.2026; : 101006.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Options for Chronic Pain After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventional, Pharmacological, and Rehabilitative Strategies
    Alok G Belgaumkar, Neha T Gaidhankar, Pooja N. V.
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Injectable Poloxamer and Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Sustained Co-Delivery of Dexamethasone and Lidocaine Ameliorates Neuropathic Pain
    Yanting Liu, Seungwoon Baik, Trung Nhan Vo, Songzi Zhang, Boram Kim, Tae-Keun Ahn, Inbo Han, Dong Keun Han
    Biomaterials Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the analgesic effect of artificial dura mater as a carrier for local hydromorphone delivery in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial
    Jian Miao, Ruiming Deng, Tingyu He, Ziqiang Dong, Xianwei Jin, Weibo Zhong
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analgesic-soaked acellular dermal matrix for postoperative pain control after endoscopic spine surgery: a retrospective chart review
    Doohun Hyun, Woo Min Park, Jung Hoon Park, Chai Min Yoo, Woo Joo Lee, Shih Min Lee, Cheol Wung Park
    Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery.2025; 21(2): 68.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Blood Pressure Optimization to Improve Outcomes in Orthopedic Patients: A Clinical Review
    Yu-fan Yang, Xiaqing Ma, Mudussar Ahmad, Paul Lee, Yibin Qin, Fu-hai Ji, Nazneen Sudhan, Ke Peng
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management.2025; Volume 21: 1667.     CrossRef
  • 21,254 View
  • 316 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Effectiveness of a Facet Joint Block Versus a Medial Branch Block in Spinal Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Neurospine. 2025;22(2):441-450.   Published online June 30, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Effectiveness of a Facet Joint Block Versus a Medial Branch Block in Spinal Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Neurospine. 2025;22(2):441-450.   Published online June 30, 2025
Close
Objective
Facet joint injections (FJIs) and medial branch blocks (MBBs) are commonly used interventions for chronic spinal pain, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the pain relief, functional improvement, complications, and patient satisfaction associated with FJI and MBB.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies were conducted. Primary outcomes included pain relief (numerical rating scale) and functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]/Neck Disability Index). Secondary outcomes assessed adverse effects and patient satisfaction. The differences in characteristics between patients who were readmitted and those who were not were identified and analyzed using the Review Manager software.
Results
FJI resulted in lower pain and ODI scores compared to MBB, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the FJI group (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–3.24; p=0.04). Additionally, FJI had fewer adverse effects than MBB.
Conclusion
Both FJI and MBB are effective for chronic spinal pain, but FJI may be preferred for patients seeking immediate pain relief with fewer complications. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine treatment guidelines.
  • 13,597 View
  • 183 Download