Ishan Khosla, Fatima N. Anwar, Andrea M. Roca, Srinath S. Medakkar, Alexandra C. Loya, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C. Wolf, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh
Neurospine 2024;21(1):253-260. Published online January 31, 2024
Objective To evaluate preoperative disability’s influence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
Methods DS patients who underwent surgical intervention were retrospectively identified from a single-surgeon spine registry. Cohorts based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) < 41 (milder disability) and ≥ 41 (severe disability) were created. Demographic differences were accounted for with 1:1 propensity score matching. For the matched sample, perioperative and PRO data were additionally collected. PROs assessed included mental health, physical function, pain, and disability. Pre- and up to 2-year postoperative PROs were utilized. Average time to final follow-up was 15.7 ± 8.8 months. Improvements in PROs and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Continuous variables were compared through Student t-test and categorical variables were compared through chi-square tests.
Results Altogether, 214 patients were included with 77 in the milder disability group. The severe disability group had worse postoperative day (POD) 1 pain scores and longer hospital stays (p ≤ 0.038, both). The severe disability group reported worse outcomes pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.011, all), but had greater average improvement in 12-item Short Form health survey mental composite score (SF-12 MCS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS)-back, and ODI by 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.037, all) and PHQ-9, VAS-back and ODI by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The severe disability cohort was more likely to achieve MCID for SF-12 MCS, PHQ-9, and ODI (p ≤ 0.003, all).
Conclusion Patients with greater baseline disability report higher POD 1 pain and discharge later than patients with milder disability. While these patients report inferior physical/mental health before and after surgery, they report greater improvements in mental health and disability postoperatively.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Surgical Site Infection After Primary Posterior Lumbar Fusion Increases the Risk of New-Onset Mental Health Disorders: Matthew H. Meade, Omar Sbaih, Hunter Smith, Nithin Gupta, Mark Miller, Ruchir Nanavati, William DiCiurcio, Hikmat Chmait, Mitchell Ng, Gregory Schroeder, Christopher Kepler, Barrett Woods, Andrew P. White Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of preoperative and postoperative depression and anxiety in patients with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy Yatao Wei, Hailun Huang, Kui Sun, Heng Gao, Zhenwen Cao, Bin Zhang, Junzhe Wu, Yongai Liu Frontiers in Psychiatry.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective To compare the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable uniplanar versus biplanar interbody cages used for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Methods A retrospective review of 1-level MIS-TLIFs performed with uniplanar and biplanar polyetheretherketone cages was performed. Radiographic measurements were performed on radiographs taken preoperatively, at 6-week follow-up, and 1-year follow-up. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg at 3-month and 1-year follow-up.
Results A total of 93 patients (41 uniplanar, 52 biplanar) were included. Both cage types provided significant postoperative improvements in anterior disc height, posterior disc height, and segmental lordosis at 1 year. No significant differences in cage subsidence rates were found between uniplanar (21.9%) and biplanar devices (32.7%) at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 2.015; 95% confidence interval, 0.651–6.235; p = 0.249) with no additional instances of subsidence at 1 year. No significant differences in the magnitude of improvements based on ODI, VAS back, or VAS leg at 3-month or 1-year follow-up between groups and the proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference in ODI, VAS back, or VAS leg at 1 year were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05). Finally, there were no significant differences in complication rates (p = 0.283), 90-day readmission rates (p = 1.00), revision surgical procedures (p = 0.423), or fusion rates at 1 year (p = 0.457) between groups.
Conclusion Biplanar and uniplanar expandable cages offer a safe and effective means of improving anterior disc height, posterior disc height, segmental lordosis, and patient-reported outcome measures at 1 year postoperatively. No significant differences in radiographic outcomes, subsidence rates, mean subsidence distance, 1-year patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative complications were noted between groups.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Radiographic Changes and Cage Subsidence following Vertically Expandable Interbody Cage Use in Single-level Lumbar Fusion for Nonosteoporotic Patients: A Retrospective Study Shih-Hao Cheng, Hsiang-Lin Huang, Yu-Chuan Tsuei, William Chu, Man-Kuan Au, Ya-Chin Chen, Wen-Hsiang Chou Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of three surgical approaches Guanyi Liu, Xuan Wang, Jiawei Zhang, Nanjian Xu, Lu Mao, Jun Qian, Xuyu Liao, Leijie Zhou, Yadan Niu European Spine Journal.2025; 34(1): 204. CrossRef
Expandable interbody cages for lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review Daniel Orr, Ron Anderson, Anna Jensen, Tyler Peterson, John Edwards, Anton E. Bowden The Spine Journal.2025; 25(8): 1773. CrossRef
Clinical outcome and complications comparison between expandable and static cages in open TLIF surgery: A 2-year retrospective study Ta-Wei Lai, Po-Ming Chen, Chi-Huan Li, Cheng-Jung Chan, Po-Cheng Cheng, Chun-Hsien Huang, Li-Ching Kuo, Ming-Chou Ku Medicine.2025; 104(34): e44042. CrossRef
Comparative Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression, Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy, and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Central Stenosis Mu Ha Lee, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Jeong-Yoon Park Neurospine.2024; 21(4): 1178. CrossRef
Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through a modified hemilateral spinous process-splitting approach Guanyi Liu, Xiaodi Zou, Yanzhao Dong, Ahmad Alhaskawi, Lihua Hu, Lu Mao, Jun Qian, Jichong Ying, Sahar Ahmed Abdalbary, Olga Alenikova, Yizhong Ma, Hui Lu Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification has been used to risk stratify surgical candidates. Our study compares outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) procedures based on preoperative ASA physical status classification.
Methods A surgical registry was reviewed for primary, single-level MIS TLIF patients. Patients were categorized by preoperative ASA physical status classification: ASA I, ASA II, ASA III+. Perioperative complications were compared among groups. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for back pain, leg pain, physical function, and disability were recorded preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. PROM improvement from baseline (ΔPROM) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated for each timepoint and compared among groups. MCID achievement was determined as ΔPROMs that surpassed previously established MCID values.
Results Of the 487 patients, 64 had an ASA classification of I, whereas 336 had an ASA of II, and 87 had an ASA of III or greater. Rates of complications were not associated with ASA classification (all p > 0.050). Neither mean PROM scores nor ΔPROM scores were significantly associated with ASA classification at any timepoint (all p > 0.050). MCID achievement was significantly associated with ASA classification for back pain at 1 year only (p = 0.041). Overall MCID achievement was not significantly associated with ASA classification for any PROM (p > 0.050).
Conclusion While ASA classification has been commonly used to risk stratify surgical candidates for spinal procedures, patients with an ASA of III or greater may be able to achieve similar long-term outcomes following MIS TLIF given proper selection criteria.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery Allison S. Karwoski, Esther Jung, Kevin Schlidt, Yvonne M. Rasko Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Baseline American Society of Anesthesiologists classification predicts worse anxiety and pain interference following Lumbar Interbody Fusion John F. Sencaj, Malik A. Siddique, Gregory A. Snigur, Sloane O. Ward, Shriya N. Patel, Kern Singh Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 131: 110929. CrossRef
Music therapy combined with anesthesia recovery care boosts anesthesia recovery in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection Yan Zheng, Hai-Fang Ni, Yan Shi, Dan-Qian Cui, Zhen-Zhu Wu, Yu-Feng Ling, Shui-Qing He, Xiao-Yun Qin World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
What Are the Risk Factors for Mechanical Failure in Spinal Arthrodesis? An Observational Study Vincenzo Peccerillo, Antonio Culcasi, Riccardo Ruisi, Francesca Amaducci, Maria Grazia Benedetti, Marco Girolami, Andrea Evangelista, Mattia Morri Surgical Techniques Development.2024; 13(1): 87. CrossRef
Efficacy of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced hemorrhoids Zhen-Jun Fang, Lin-Xue Wang, Fa Jin World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(5): 361. CrossRef
Periotome versus piezotome as an aid for atraumatic extraction: a randomized controlled trial Mohammed Abdullah Alraqibah, Jingade Krishnojirao Dayashankara Rao, Bader Massad Alharbi Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.2022; 48(6): 356. CrossRef
Objective Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery. However, PROMIS is vulnerable to nonresponse bias. The purpose of this study is to characterize differences in patient-reported outcome measure scores between patients who do and do not complete PROMIS physical function (PF) surveys following lumbar spine surgery.
Methods A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for primary, elective lumbar spine procedures from 2015 to 2019. Outcome measures for Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS) back & leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-item Short Form health survey physical composite summary (SF-12 PCS) were recorded at both preoperative and postoperative (6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years) timepoints. Completion rates for PROMIS PF surveys were recorded and patients were categorized into groups based on completion. Differences in mean scores at each timepoint between groups was determined.
Results Eight hundred nine patients were included with an average age of 48.1 years. No significant differences were observed for all outcome measures between PROMIS completion groups preoperatively. Postoperative PHQ-9, VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores differed significantly between groups through 1 year (all p < 0.05). SF-12 PCS differed significantly only at 6 weeks (p = 0.003).
Conclusion Patients who did not complete PROMIS PF surveys had significantly poorer outcomes than those that did in terms of postoperative depressive symptoms, pain, and disability. This suggests that patients completing PROMIS questionnaires may represent a healthier cohort than the overall lumbar spine population.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Is It Fair That Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Completion Is Tied to Reimbursement? Patient Demographics Are Associated With Rates of PROM Completion and Potential Health Disparities Jake Laverdiere, Swaroopa Vaidya, Gregory Panza, Dianne Vye, Jenna Bernstein The Journal of Arthroplasty.2026; 41(2): 329. CrossRef
Patient Variability Drives Postoperative Outcome Volatility More Than Surgeon or Indication: A Bayesian Simulation Study of PROMIS Global Health for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Seth M. Meade, Michael Shost, Arpan A. Patel, Daniel T. Lilly, Brittany Lapin, Michael P. Steinmetz, Thomas Mroz, Ghaith Habboub Neurosurgery.2026; 98(6): 1288. CrossRef
Patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee arthroplasty in Ontario, Canada Steven Habbous, Stephen Petersen, Calum Thompson, James Waddell, Brent Lanting, Sarah Ward, Erik Hellsten Journal of Orthopaedics.2026; 75: 191. CrossRef
The use of machine learning for the prediction of response to follow-up in spine registries Alice Baroncini, Andrea Campagner, Federico Cabitza, Francesco Langella, Francesca Barile, Pablo Bellosta-López, Domenico Compagnone, Riccardo Cecchinato, Marco Damilano, Andrea Redaelli, Daniele Vanni, Pedro Berjano International Journal of Medical Informatics.2025; 195: 105752. CrossRef
Improving equitable collection and analysis of PROMIS Global Health data over time following spine surgery: characterizing survey nonresponse and missing data David Shin, Seth Meade, Gabrielle Scariano, Yadi Li, Arpan A. Patel, Brittany Lapin, Michael P. Steinmetz, Thomas Mroz, Ghaith Habboub The Spine Journal.2025; 25(10): 2299. CrossRef
Validation of PROMIS anxiety item bank computer adaptive test among patients with heart failure Nolan Marblestone, Steven Chu, Nicole Tomei, Denzel Lodge, Aarushi Bansal, Nathaniel Edwards, Heather J. Ross, Josef Stehlik, Desana Thayaparan, Jad Fadlallah, Joshua G. Lee, Istvan Mucsi Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictors of Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Rates Among Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair Nomi S. Weiss-Laxer, Sonja Pavlesen, Alfonso Arevalo, Joycelyn Jeffords, Mohammad N. Haider, Leslie J. Bisson The American Journal of Sports Medicine.2024; 52(1): 215. CrossRef
An Injectable Engineered Cartilage Gel Improves Intervertebral Disc Repair in a Rat Nucleotomy Model Basanta Bhujel, Soon Shim Yang, Hwal Ran Kim, Sung Bum Kim, Byoung-Hyun Min, Byung Hyune Choi, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3146. CrossRef
Enhanced Intervertebral Disc Repair via Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Tetracycline Regulatory System Yeji Kim, Seong Bae An, Sang-Hyuk Lee, Jong Joo Lee, Sung Bum Kim, Jae-Cheul Ahn, Dong-Youn Hwang, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(22): 16024. CrossRef
Objective To assess the impact of bilateral versus unilateral interbody cages on outcomes for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) procedures.
Methods A retrospective review for primary, elective, single-level MIS TLIF procedures with bilateral posterior instrumentation from 2008–2020 was performed. Patients were grouped according to unilateral or bilateral interbody cage use. Procedures performed without static interbody cages or indicated for trauma, infection, malignancy were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, 12-item Short Form health survey physical composite score (SF-12 PCS), PatientReported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). PROs were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Change in PROs (Δ) was calculated and compared between groups. Achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using established values from the literature. Achievement rates were compared between groups using logistic regression.
Results The study included 151 patients, with 111 unilateral and 40 bilateral cage placements. Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetes, and insurance status differed between groups (p < 0.050). Prevalence of degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis (both p ≤ 0.002), operative level (p = 0.003), and postoperative length of stay (p = 0.022) significantly differed between groups. The unilateral group had lower 1-year arthrodesis rates (p = 0.035). Preoperative VAS leg (p = 0.017) and SF-12 PCS (p = 0.045) were worse for the unilateral group. ΔPROMIS-PF was greater for the bilateral group at 2 years (p = 0.001). Majority of patients achieved an overall MCID for all PROs, except VAS leg (bilateral group).
Conclusion While preoperative status and postoperative arthrodesis rates differed, patients achieved an MCID at similar rates regardless of use of unilateral or bilateral cages.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of nonunion on patient-related outcomes after single level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: A propensity score–matched analysis Tatsuya Yamamoto, Momotaro Kawai, Tomohisa Tabata, Yohei Takahashi, Jun Ogawa European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 1736. CrossRef
Comparative outcomes of unilateral and bilateral cage placement in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Stavros Stamiris, Dimitrios Stamiris, Elissavet Anestiadou, Athanasios Sarridimitriou, Angeliki Cheva, Antonia Loukousia, Vasilleios Vrangalas, Pavlos Christodoulou, Christos Karampalis Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(2): 372. CrossRef
Is there a difference in unilateral versus bilateral facetectomy in an open or minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis Mario Cyriac Tchaya Tcheukado, George Nageeb, Jonathan Hintz, Michael Steinmetz, Mohamed Macki Surgical Neurology International.2026; 17: 110. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of single vs. double cage insertion in unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes Guisi Xie, Yanli Pan, Zhongshu Shan, Chan Wang Lei, Lek Hang Cheang, Jiaming Liang, Junfeng Shen, Wei Zhang, Chengyue Zhu Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Letter re: Letter to the Editor Concerning ‘Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Minimally Invasive vs. Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion’ Sitian Niu, Ranran Li, Jingzhi Wang Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 1459. CrossRef
Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Jae-Won Shin, Yung Park, Sang-Ho Kim, Sung-Ryul Choi, Joong-Won Ha, Hak Sun Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Sung-Hwan Moon, Si-Young Park, Byung-Ho Lee, Ji-Won Kwon, Hee-Min Choi Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 1457. CrossRef
Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (EELF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a prospective observational study Jun-Hoe Kim, Hangeul Park, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-Term Risk of Adjacent-Segment Disease in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Interbody Fusion Delia Cannizzaro, Gabriele Capo, Matteo Gionso, Donato Creatura, Mario De Robertis, Carla Daniela Anania, Emanuele Stucchi, Emilia Bellina, Ali Baram, Carlo Brembilla, Massimo Tomei, Alessandro Ortolina, Emanuela Morenghi, Franco Servadei, Federico Pessin World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123822. CrossRef
Biomechanical Comparison of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Implants: Static vs Expandable Cages and Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cages Clayton L. Rosinski, Nicole A. D. Watson, Michael E. Kritikos, Kirill V. Nourski, Anthony J. Marincovich, Tyson S. Matern, Prabin Shrestha, Patrick W. Hitchon Operative Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Mohammad Daher, Marven Aoun, Pierre El-Sett, Gaby Kreichati, Khalil Kharrat, Amer Sebaaly World Neurosurgery.2024; 186: 158. CrossRef
An evaluation of fusion status following lumbar fusion surgery utilizing multi-planar computed tomography Tariq Z. Issa, Yunsoo Lee, Jeremy Heard, Tyler W. Henry, Michael A. McCurdy, Nicholas Siegel, Caroline Zaworksi, Julia Dambly, Jose A. Canseco, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, John Mangan, Mark Lambrechts, Christopher K. Kep European Spine Journal.2024; 33(9): 3545. CrossRef
Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol Joonsoo Lim, Jangyeob Lim, Asfandyar Khan, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Sejin Choi, Tae-Shin Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Sangwook T. Yoon, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary on “Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies” Yanting Liu, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Jin-Sung Kim Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 464. CrossRef
Comparison of Lumbosacral Fusion Grade in Patients after Transforaminal and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimum 2‐Year Follow‐Up Jinping Liu, Rong Xie, Cynthia T. Chin, Priya Rajagopalan, Ping‐Guo Duan, Bo Li, Shane Burch, Sigurd H. Berven, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Dean Chou Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(9): 2334. CrossRef
A Comparison of Radiographic Alignment between Bilateral and Unilateral Interbody Cages in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Mark James Lambrechts, Jeremy Heard, Nicholas D’Antonio, John Bodnar, Gregory Schneider, Evan Bloom, Jose Canseco, Barrett Woods, Ian David Kaye, Mark Kurd, Jeffrey Rihn, Alan Hilibrand, Gregory Schroeder, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(4): 666. CrossRef
Morphometric Comparison of Interbody Fusion with Cage and Autograft at L4-L5 Levels versus Autograft Alone for Fusion Azmi Tufan, Feyza Karagöz Güzey, Abdurrahman Aycan Bagcilar Medical Bulletin.2023; 8(3): 293. CrossRef
Lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral cages using a biportal endoscopic technique with a third portal Chengyue Zhu, Liangping Zhang, Hao Pan, Wei Zhang Acta Neurochirurgica.2022; 164(9): 2343. CrossRef
Safety and efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Rui Zhong, Xiali Xue, Runsheng Wang, Jing Dan, Chuanen Wang, Daode Liu Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective Adult cervical deformity (ACD) is a debilitating spinal condition that causes significant pain, neurologic dysfunction, and functional impairment. Surgery is often performed to correct cervical alignment, but the optimal amount of correction required to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are not yet well-defined.
Methods A review of the literature was performed and Fisher z-transformation (Zr) was used to pool the correlation coefficients between alignment parameters and PROs. The strength of correlation was defined according to the following: poor (0 < r ≤ 0.3), fair (0.3 < r ≤ 0.5), moderate (0.5 < r ≤ 0.8), and strong (0.8 < r ≤ 1).
Results Increased C2–7 sagittal vertical axis was fairly associated with increased Neck Disability Index (NDI) (pooled Zr = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.03 to 0.58). Changes in T1 slope minus cervical lordosis poorly correlated with NDI (pooled Zr = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.30). Increased C7–S1 was poorly associated with worse EuroQoL 5-Dimension (pooled Zr = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.06). Correction of horizontal gaze did not correlate with legacy metrics. Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association correlated with C2-slope, C7–S1, and C2–S1.
Conclusion Spinal alignment parameters variably correlated with improved health-related quality of life and myelopathy after corrective surgery for ACD. Further studies evaluating legacy PROs, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System, and ACD specific instruments are needed for further validation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Current Concepts of Sagittal Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Zeeshan M. Sardar, Justin L. Reyes, Josephine R. Coury, K. Daniel Riew Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2026; 34(2): e176. CrossRef
Outcomes of Surgical Intervention of Dystrophic Cervical Kyphosis in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review Dewa Gde Prema Ananda, Ida Bagus Sutha Dwipajaya, Ida Bagus Artha Vijaya Antara, Nia Irayati, Asra Al Fauzi Spine Surgery and Related Research.2026; 10(1): 11. CrossRef
Normative Cervical and Cervicothoracic Sagittal Alignment Parameters for Asymptomatic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of >35,900 Participants Alexandra C. Dionne, Prakash Gorroochurn, Roy Miller, Prerana Katiyar, Samuel Bennion, Lisa Bonsignore-Opp, Josephine R. Coury, Fthimnir M. Hassan, Joseph M. Lombardi, Lawrence G. Lenke, Justin L. Reyes, Zeeshan M. Sardar Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive value of preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis for clinical outcomes after standalone laminectomy in elderly degenerative cervical myelopathy Ahmed Mohammed Ragab, Mahmoud M. Taha, Mansour Abdel Mageed Makkia, Ayman M. Ismail Scientific Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Neck and shoulder pain in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 10 years after posterior spinal fusion Masayuki Ohashi, Kei Watanabe, Toru Hirano, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Hideki Tashi, Tatsuo Makino, Keitaro Minato, Masayuki Sato, Hiroyuki Kawashima European Spine Journal.2024; 33(6): 2522. CrossRef
The Efficacy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Is Enhanced When Used With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Cervical Spinal Tumor Surgery Danbi Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Subum Lee, Jemin Park, Hyeon Gyu Yang, Chongman Kim, Jin Hoon Park Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 352. CrossRef
Patient-specific implants and spinal alignment outcomes Renzo A. Laynes, Christopher J. Kleck North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2024; 20: 100559. CrossRef
The Conceptualization and Derivation of the Cervical Lordosis Distribution Index Peter G. Passias, Tyler K. Williamson, Pooja Dave, Justin S. Smith, Oscar Krol, Renaud Lafage, Breton Line, Bassel G. Diebo, Alan H. Daniels, Eric O. Klineberg, Robert K. Eastlack, Shay Bess, Frank J. Schwab, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Virginie Lafage, Chri Spine.2024; 49(24): 1685. CrossRef
Radiographic Outcomes Following ACDF With Hyperlordotic Implants to Achieve Cervical Anterior Column Realignment Shane Shahrestani, Andy Ton, Nolan J. Brown, Zach Pennington, Joshua J. Loya, Cathleen Kuo, Yusuf Mehkri, Julian Gendreau, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham, Donald Blaskiewicz World Neurosurgery.2023; 174: e1. CrossRef
Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis Seungyoon Paik, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, John Min Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Thamer Hamdan PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281926. CrossRef
Concepts and Techniques to Prevent Cervical Spine Deformity After Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review Robert K. Merrill, John C. Clohisy, Todd J. Albert, Sheeraz A. Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 221. CrossRef
L1-pelvic angle: a convenient measurement to attain optimal deformity correction Hani Chanbour, William Hunter Waddell, Justin Vickery, Matthew E. LaBarge, Andrew J. Croft, Michael Longo, Steven G. Roth, Jeffrey M. Hills, Amir M. Abtahi, Scott L. Zuckerman, Byron F. Stephens European Spine Journal.2023; 32(11): 4003. CrossRef
Relationship between TIA minus C0-7 angle and C2-7 SVA: analysis of 113 symptomatic patients Kai Yang, Xiang-Yu Li, Yu Wang, Chao Kong, Shi-Bao Lu BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Reciprocal Changes in the Whole-Body Following Realignment Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim Asian Spine Journal.2022; 16(6): 958. CrossRef
Health risk assessment of groundwater nitrogen pollution in Yinchuan plain Bo Feng, Yuxue Ma, Yarong Qi, Yanxia Zhong, Xiaohua Sha Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.2022; : 104031. CrossRef
Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity? Lara Passfall, Tyler K. Williamson, Oscar Krol, Jordan Lebovic, Bailey Imbo, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Peter Tretiakov, Katerina Dangas, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Heiko Koller, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel G. Diebo, Shaleen Vira, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(3): 368. CrossRef
Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 463. CrossRef
Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future? Jae-Koo Lee, Jong Hwa Park, Seung-Jae Hyun, Daniel Hodel, Oliver N. Hausmann Neurospine.2021; 18(4): 733. CrossRef
James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Shruthi Mohan, Caroline N. Jadczak, David P. Matichak, Kern Singh
Neurospine 2021;18(1):155-162. Published online March 31, 2021
Objective Our study aims to evaluate the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) with legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for ACDF surgeries performed between May 2015 and September 2017. Inclusion criteria were primary elective, single- or multilevel ACDFs for degenerative spinal pathology. Patients lacking preoperative or 2-year PROMIS PF surveys were excluded. Mean scores were calculated for visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and PROMIS PF at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient were utilized to evaluate score improvement and PROM relationships respectively.
Results The 50 subject cohort was 60.0% male, 50% obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and had an average age of 50.9 years. Significant improvements were demonstrated for VAS neck and NDI at all postoperative timepoints (p < 0.001) and for SF-12 and PROMIS PF at all timepoints except 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.025). VAS arm improvement was seen up to 1 year (p ≤ 0.016). PROMIS PF demonstrated strong correlations with NDI and SF-12 PCS at all evaluated timepoints and with VAS neck at all postoperative timepoints except 6 weeks (all p < 0.01).
Conclusion PROMIS PF was strongly correlated with pain, disability, and physical function up to 2 years for patients undergoing ACDF. Our results support the long-term validity of PROMIS PF for measurement of patient-reported physical function among ACDF cohorts.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161. CrossRef
Influence of Preoperative Physical Function Scores on Outcomes After Single-level Cervical Disc Replacement Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(7): E376. CrossRef
Are Mildly Disabled Patients Appropriate for Spine Bundles? An Application of the Operative Value Index Advith Sarikonda, Ashmal Sami, D. Mitchell Self, Emily Isch, Alexander Zavitsanos, Antony A. Fuleihan, Ayra Khan, Conor Dougherty, Danyal Quraishi, Jack Jallo, Joshua Heller, Srinivas K. Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, James Harrop, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Ahilan S World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123797. CrossRef
Rates of cervical spine surgery and repeat epidural injections after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with cervical radiculopathy utilizing a large national database Andrew R. Stephens, Ramzi El-Hassan, Ashley Rogerson Interventional Pain Medicine.2025; 4(4): 100651. CrossRef
Quantitative evaluation of upper extremity strength recovery after cervical epidural block: a retrospective study Dong Hyuck Kim, Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2025; 42: 73. CrossRef
Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500. CrossRef
Severe Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor of Early Readmission and Nonhome Discharge After Cervical Disc Replacement Tejas Subramanian, Daniel Shinn, Pratyush Shahi, Izzet Akosman, Troy Amen, Omri Maayan, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Junho Song, Sidhant Dalal, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 890. CrossRef
The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Andrea M. Roca, Fatima N. Anwar, Alexandra C. Loya, Srinath S. Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C. Wolf, Ishan Khosla, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2023; 180: e756. CrossRef
Completion Rates for PROMIS Physical Function Surveys Compared with Legacy PROMs in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Cara E. Geoghegan, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Neck Disability at Presentation Influences Long-Term Clinical Improvement for Neck Pain, Arm Pain, Disability, and Physical Function in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Andrew P. Collins, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 163: e663. CrossRef
Level-specific Perioperative and Clinical Outcome Comparison: Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 in Patients With Myeloradiculopathy Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Alexander W. Parsons, Michael C. Prabhu, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2022; 30(17): e1137. CrossRef
The Effect of the Preoperative Severity of Neck Pain on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Nisheka Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael Prabhu, Kanhai S. Amin, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 165: e337. CrossRef
Preoperative Physical Function Association With Mental Health Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Thomas S. Brundage, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(10): E559. CrossRef
Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875. CrossRef
Objective While visual analogue score (VAS) metrics are among the most universally adopted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), there is limited research on the influence of back and leg pain on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores. Here we assess the association of VAS back and VAS leg scores with PROMIS PF in the setting of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Secondarily, we determine if PROMIS PF is more influenced by back or leg pain.
Methods A prospective surgical registry was reviewed from May 2015 to November 2018. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level MIS TLIFs. We excluded multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative PROMs. Pre- and postoperative PROMIS PF, VAS back, and VAS leg scores were recorded at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. A Pearson correlation evaluated PROMIS PF association with VAS back and VAS leg scores. A Fisher z-test compared correlations. Linear regression evaluated PROMIS with VAS back and VAS leg scores.
Results Our cohort was comprised of 146 subjects. 40.4% were female and the average age of 51 years. VAS back demonstrated a stronger correlation than VAS leg with PROMIS PF at all timepoints. PROMIS PF scores were negatively associated with both VAS back and VAS leg at all timepoints. Fisher z-test revealed VAS back to have a stronger correlation with PROMIS PF (p = 0.025) than VAS leg.
Conclusion In the setting of MIS TLIF, physical function as evaluated by PROMIS PF, had a stronger correlation with VAS back than VAS leg at 6 months. This suggests that postoperative PROMIS PF scores may be more influenced by back pain than with leg pain.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical and functional outcome of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in single segment lumbar spinal disease: a prospective observational study Cheemullu Shivashankar Shreyas, Mahendra Singh Tak, Mahesh Bhati, Lakshit Suthar International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.2025; 13(4): 1524. CrossRef
Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery Bryon Jun Xiong Teo, Tet Sen Howe, Cheri Chan, Joyce SB. Koh, William Yeo, Yeong Huei Ng Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature Alexander Ziedas, Varag Abed, Carter Bench, Tahsin Rahman, Melvin C. Makhni The Spine Journal.2022; 22(4): 646. CrossRef
Two-year validation and minimal clinically important difference of the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical Component Score in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D. K. Cha, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Kern Singh Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(5): 731. CrossRef
Mental Health as a Predictor of Preoperative Expectations for Pain and Disability Following Lumbar Fusion Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Grant J. Park, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Andrew P. Collins, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 161: e401. CrossRef
Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results Young-Ho Roh, Jae Chul Lee, Jinyeong Hwang, Hyung-Ki Cho, Jaewan Soh, Sung-Woo Choi, Byung-Joon Shin Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Location of Disc Herniation May Affect Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Shivam Patel, Andrew P. Collins, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Augustus J. Rush III, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Kern Singh Neurospine.2021; 18(4): 854. CrossRef
Objective This study examines the associations between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) score, measured by PROMIS-PF and the change between pre- and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores.
Methods A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for spine surgeries between May 2015–June 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Revisions, multilevel procedures, and patients missing preoperative surveys were excluded. Patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS-PF scores of ≥ 35 and < 35, with higher scores indicating greater PF. A chi-squared and Student t-test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables respectively. Linear regression evaluated the relationship of PROMIS-PF score improvement.
Results Of the 180 subjects, 84 were in the PROMIS-PF < 35 group which had more obese patients (p < 0.001) and more males (p = 0.001). Length of stay was greater for the PROMIS-PF < 35 group (36.2 hours vs. 28.7 hours, p = 0.014). PROMIS-PF and Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly different between subgroups at all timepoints. PROMIS-PF < 35 cohort had larger postoperative PROMIS-PF improvements at 6 weeks (p = 0.008) and 12 weeks (p = 0.003). Linear regression demonstrated a negative association between preoperative PROMIS-PF scores and improvement at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years (p < 0.001). PROMIS-PF < 35 demonstrated significantly lower rate of achieving minimum clinically important difference at 6 months, otherwise no difference observed throughout the 2-year follow-up.
Conclusion Up to 6 months postoperatively, lower preoperative PROMIS-PF scores were associated with larger PROMIS-PF improvements. Understanding the relationship preoperative PROMIS-PF scores have with postoperative improvement may enable better patient counseling.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161. CrossRef
Predictors of Delayed Clinical Benefit Following Surgical Treatment for Low-grade Spondylolisthesis Mladen Djurasovic, Leah Y. Carreon, Erica F. Bisson, Andrew K. Chan, Mohamad Bydon, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Kevin T. Foley, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Eric A. Potts, Mark E. Shaffrey, Domagoj Coric, John J. Knightly, Paul Park, Michael Y. Wang, Kai-Ming Fu, J Spine.2025; 50(11): E213. CrossRef
New Patient PROMIS Scores of Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain Predict Time to Elective Spine Surgery Justin E. Kung, Chase Gauthier, Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Richard A. Bidwell, David G. Edelman, Heidi C. Ventresca, J. Benjamin Jackson, Shari Cui, Gregory Grabowski Spine Surgery and Related Research.2025; 9(2): 237. CrossRef
Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function With Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy Patawut Bovonratwet, Avani S. Vaishnav, Jung K. Mok, Hikari Urakawa, Marcel Dupont, Dimitra Melissaridou, Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Daniel J. Shinn, Sidhant S. Dalal, Kasra Araghi, Evan D. Sheha, Catherine H. Gang, Sheeraz A. Qureshi Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(1): 225. CrossRef
Socioeconomic disadvantage is correlated with worse PROMIS outcomes following lumbar fusion Hashim J.F. Shaikh, Clarke I. Cady-McCrea, Emmanuel N. Menga, Robert W. Molinari, Addisu Mesfin, Paul T. Rubery, Varun Puvanesarajah The Spine Journal.2024; 24(1): 107. CrossRef
Depression State Correlates with Functional Recovery Following Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion Clarke I. Cady-McCrea, Hashim J.F. Shaikh, Sandeep Mannava, Jonathan Stone, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Addisu Mesfin, Robert W. Molinari, Emmanuel N. Menga, Paul T. Rubery, Varun Puvanesarajah World Neurosurgery.2024; 187: e107. CrossRef
The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Grant A. Park, Jessica R. Gheewala, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(1): E6. CrossRef
Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery Ron Gilat, Ilan Y. Mitchnik, Sumit Patel, Jeremy A. Dubin, Gabriel Agar, Eran Tamir, Dror Lindner, Yiftah Beer Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2023; 143(11): 6617. CrossRef
Two-year validation and minimal clinically important difference of the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical Component Score in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D. K. Cha, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Kern Singh Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(5): 731. CrossRef
Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers’ Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 167: e251. CrossRef
Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g. , ≥ 35.0, < 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement.
Results Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p < 0.001).
Conclusion Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161. CrossRef
New Patient PROMIS Scores of Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain Predict Time to Elective Spine Surgery Justin E. Kung, Chase Gauthier, Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Richard A. Bidwell, David G. Edelman, Heidi C. Ventresca, J. Benjamin Jackson, Shari Cui, Gregory Grabowski Spine Surgery and Related Research.2025; 9(2): 237. CrossRef
Clinical Utility and Patient Compliance With Mobile Applications for Home-based Rehabilitation Following Cervical Spine Fusion Arpitha Pamula, Katie Lee, Alex Tang, Tan Chen Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure Andrew R. Stephens, Nicholas R. Bender, Jim M. Snyder, Rajeev K. Patel, Ramzi El-Hassan Interventional Pain Medicine.2024; 3(4): 100528. CrossRef
The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Grant A. Park, Jessica R. Gheewala, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(1): E6. CrossRef
Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System With Traditional Outcome Metrics in Spine Surgery Emily Arciero, Sohil Desai, Josephine Coury, Puneet Gupta, David P. Trofa, Zeeshan Sardar, Joseph Lombardi JBJS Reviews.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Are We Considering the Whole Patient? The Impact of Physical and Mental Health on the Outcomes of Spine Care Justin J. Turcotte, Samantha Baxter, Karen Pipkin, Chad M. Patton Spine.2023; 48(10): 720. CrossRef
Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500. CrossRef
Association of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures With Injection and Surgical Treatment Response in Patients With De Quervain Tenosynovitis Gilbert Smolyak, Bowen Qiu, Courtney Marie Cora Jones, Constantinos Ketonis The Journal of Hand Surgery.2023; 48(11): 1098. CrossRef
Association between serum multi-protein biomarker profile and real-world disability in multiple sclerosis Wen Zhu, Chenyi Chen, Lili Zhang, Tammy Hoyt, Elizabeth Walker, Shruthi Venkatesh, Fujun Zhang, Ferhan Qureshi, John F Foley, Zongqi Xia Brain Communications.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Mark J. Lambrechts, Nicholas D. D'Antonio, Brian A. Karamian, Gregory R. Toci, Matthew Sherman, Jose A. Canseco, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Alan S. Hilibrand, Gregory D. Schroeder The Spine Journal.2022; 22(10): 1610. CrossRef
The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedure Duration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Brian A. Karamian, Paul D. Minetos, Hannah A. Levy, Gregory R. Toci, Mark J. Lambrechts, Jose A. Canseco, Derek G. Ju, Ariana A. Reyes, Daniel R. Bowles, I. David Kaye, Mark F. Kurd, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e548. CrossRef
Predictors of Early Clinically Significant Improvement Among Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Multivariate Analysis Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Hanna Pawlowski, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge Rafa Rahman, Sara Wallam, Bo Zhang, Rahul Sachdev, Emmanuel L. McNeely, Khaled M. Kebaish, Lee H. Riley, David B. Cohen, Amit Jain, Sang H. Lee, Daniel M. Sciubba, Richard L. Skolasky, Brian J. Neuman World Neurosurgery.2021; 150: e600. CrossRef
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Validation for Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Shruthi Mohan, Caroline N. Jadczak, David P. Matichak, Kern Singh Neurospine.2021; 18(1): 155. CrossRef
Safety and Tolerability of Stromal Vascular Fraction Combined with β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Phase I Clinical Trial Kyoung-Tae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Un Yong Choi, Sang Heon Lim, Young Jae Kim, Seil Sohn, Seung Hun Sheen, Chan Yeong Heo, Inbo Han Cells.2020; 9(10): 2250. CrossRef
First
Prev
