Objective To assess the effectiveness of vertebral cement augmentation (VCA) at upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV+1 in preventing proximal junction complications in correction surgery for adult spinal deformity patients.
Methods A literature search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for comparative studies published before December 30th, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed study quality with Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and extracted data like study characteristics, surgical details, primary and secondary outcomes. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata software.
Results Of all 513 papers screened, a meta-analysis was conducted on 7 articles, which included 333 cases in the VCA group and 827 cases in the control group. Patients in the VCA group had significantly older age and lower T score than patients in the control group. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of proximal junctional failure between the 2 groups, the results of the meta-analysis showed that the incidence of proximal junctional failure and the need for revision surgery were reduced by 36% and 71%, respectively, in the VCA group. One study reported 2 clinically silent pulmonary cement embolism and 1 patient requiring surgical decompression for cement leak into the spinal canal.
Conclusion This meta-analysis supported the use of VCA in corrective surgery for spinal deformities patients, especially in patients with advanced age and osteoporosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Technical Review of Tethering and Adjunctive Strategies Paritash Tahmasebpour, Pawel P. Jankowski, Jason Liang, Joshua Lin, Kyriakos D. Chatzis, Peter S. Tretiakov, Spencer Matthews, Louis Boissiere, John F. Burke, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Aaron Hockley, Peter Passias Operative Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Vertebral Cement Augmentation is Associated With Reduced Rates of Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1211 Patients Stavros Matsoukas, Shaan Patel, Pavlos Texakalidis, Teleale F. Gebeyehu, Joshua E. Heller, Jack Jallo, James S. Harrop, Srinivas K. Prasad Operative Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Revisiting Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review Gilbert Bungay Dimacali, Byung Ho Lee Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2025; 32(4): 144. CrossRef
Objective To compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3.
Methods AIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores.
Results Twenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation > 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation > 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group.
Conclusion The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Spinal Anaesthesia in Non-instrumented Lumbar Spine Surgery: Does it Work? Obiegbu Henry Obinna, Nze Iheanyichukwu Noel, Okafor Sylvester Ezechukwu, Obiegbu Chisom Renee Journal of West African College of Surgeons.2026; 16(2): 151. CrossRef
A mathematical model for estimating the intraoperative lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt angle using preoperative supine left side-bending (LSB) radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with lenke type 1 and 2 non-AR curves Mun Keong Kwan, Sin Ying Lee, Sze Khiong Fam, Yee Wern Evonne Tan, Chun Hong Ngan, Saturveithan Chandirasegaran, Chee Kidd Chiu, Chris Yin Wei Chan European Spine Journal.2025; 34(2): 610. CrossRef
Risk factors for the progression of distal adding-on phenomenon after surgery in patients with Lenke type 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Tao Li, Yong Li, Xiangbin Wang, Yubin Long Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis : A Case Series of 139 Consecutive Patients Treated in Neurosurgical Department SungSoo Bae, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jae-Koo Lee, Dae-Jean Jo, Ki-Jeong Kim Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2025; 68(5): 585. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using fulcrum bending radiographs to determine curve rigidity Prudence Wing Hang Cheung, Victoria Yuk Ting Hui, Samuel Tin Yan Cheung, James Long Ki Lin, Garvin Chi Chun Cheung, Jason Pui Yin Cheung Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 71: 103222. CrossRef
Postoperative Gravity Line-Hip Axis Offset as a Substantial Risk Factor for Mechanical Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery Sungjae An, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jae-Koo Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurosurgery.2023; 92(5): 998. CrossRef
Optimal lowest instrumented vertebra selection with consideration of coronal and sagittal planes to prevent distal junctional complications in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Tomohiro Banno, Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Hideyuki Arima, Shin Oe, Koichiro Ide, Tomohiro Yamada, Kenta Kurosu, Keiichi Nakai, Yukihiro Matsuyama Spine Deformity.2023; 11(5): 1145. CrossRef
Selection of Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery Seung-Ho Seo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jae-Koo Lee, Yong Jae Cho, Dae Jean Jo, Jin Hoon Park, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 799. CrossRef
Lowest Instrumented Vertebra at L3 Versus L4 in Posterior Fusion for Moderate Lenke 5C Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Match Radiological Study Zhiyi Li, You Du, Yiwei Zhao, Guanfeng Lin, Haoran Zhang, Chenkai Li, Xiaohan Ye, Yang Yang, Shengru Wang, Jianguo Zhang Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1380. CrossRef
Pediatric Spine Trauma Sungjae An, Seung-Jae Hyun Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2022; 65(3): 361. CrossRef
The Last Touched Vertebra on Supine Radiographs Can Be the Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Do-Hyoung Kim, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chang-Hyun Lee, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 236. CrossRef
Highly porous multiple-cell-laden collagen/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering YoungWon Koo, Hyeongjin Lee, Chang Su Lim, Su Yeon Kwon, Inbo Han, Geun Hyung Kim International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2022; 222: 1264. CrossRef
Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Seung Heon Yang, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 912. CrossRef
Selection of Fusion Level for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery : Selective Fusion versus Postoperative Decompensation Do-Hyoung Kim, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(4): 473. CrossRef
Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future? Jae-Koo Lee, Jong Hwa Park, Seung-Jae Hyun, Daniel Hodel, Oliver N. Hausmann Neurospine.2021; 18(4): 733. CrossRef
Objective To examine existing literature and pool the data to determine the relative odds ratio of “adding-on” (AO) based on various reported criteria for lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in Lenke type 1A and 2A curves.
Methods Using electronic databases, studies reporting on AO and LIV selection in Lenke type 1A and 2A curves were identified. Studies were excluded if they failed to meet the following criteria: ≥ 30 patients, Lenke type 1A or 2A curves, thoracic-only fusions, and inclusion of outcome differences in AO and non-AO groups. Review articles, letters, and case reports were excluded.
Results Six studies were identified reporting on 732 patients with either Lenke type 1A or 2A curves treated with thoracic-only fusions. Five different landmarks were used for LIV selection in these studies including the stable vertebra (SV) -1, end vertebra (EV) +1, neutral vertebra (NV), touched vertebra (TV), and substantially touched vertebra (STV) versus nonsubstantially touched vertebra (nSTV) +1. The pooled odds ratios of AO for choosing LIV at levels above the afore landmarks (i.e. , ending the construct “short”) versus at the landmarks were 2.59 (SV-1), 2.43 (EV+1), 3.05 (NV), 3.40 (TV), and 4.52 (STV/nSTV+1), all at 95% confidence interval.
Conclusion Five landmarks shared a similar characteristic in that the incidence of AO was significantly higher if the LIV was proximal to the chosen landmark. In addition, choosing STV/(nSTV+1) as the LIV have the lowest absolute risk of AO and the greatest risk reduction. If additional levels were fused (i.e. , LIV distal to the landmark), there was no statistically significant benefit in further reducing the risk of AO. Selection of the optimal LIV is a complex issue and spine surgeons must balance the risk of AO with the need for motion preservation in young patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Lowest Instrumented Vertebra (LIV) Index as a Supplemental Indicator to Lastly Touched Vertebra for Selection of the Fusion Level in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis I-Hsin Chen, Chih-Wei Chen, Chuan-Ching Huang, Jui-Yo Hsu, Po-Yao Wang, Yuan-Fuu Lee, Yu-Cheng Yeh, Po-Liang Lai, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Shu-Hua Yang Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(2): 956. CrossRef
Advances in fusion level selection and surgical approaches for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on the Lenke classification system: a narrative review Ruiyuan Chen, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Minghui Liang, Shuo Yuan, Lei Zang, Ning Fan BMC Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The Impact of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on the Correction of the Minor Curve During Selective Fusion in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Max Prost, Philip Denz, Joachim Windolf, Markus Rafael Konieczny Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(3): E135. CrossRef
The benefits of touched vertebra concept for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in thoracic curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Dong-Gune Chang, Lawrence G. Lenke, Hong Jin Kim, Javier Pizones, René Castelein, Per D. Trobisch, Kota Watanabe, Kee-Yong Ha, Se-Il Suk European Spine Journal.2025; 34(1): 234. CrossRef
A mathematical model for estimating the intraoperative lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt angle using preoperative supine left side-bending (LSB) radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with lenke type 1 and 2 non-AR curves Mun Keong Kwan, Sin Ying Lee, Sze Khiong Fam, Yee Wern Evonne Tan, Chun Hong Ngan, Saturveithan Chandirasegaran, Chee Kidd Chiu, Chris Yin Wei Chan European Spine Journal.2025; 34(2): 610. CrossRef
Postoperative forward flexion loss in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How it relates to the lowest instrumented vertebra and function Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Thijs Ackermans, Fred Ruythooren, Tom Leppens, Pierre Moens, Anja Van Campenhout, Lieven Moke, Lennart Scheys Gait & Posture.2025; 122: 10. CrossRef
Fenómeno Adding-on en pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente tratados quirúrgicamente en un hospital de ortopedia de referencia José Luis García-Navarro, Jorge Quiroz-Williams, Elías Kaleb Rojero-Gil, Suemmy Gaytán-Fernández, Rubén Romero-Méndez, José Pedro Martínez-Asención, Rodolfo Gregorio Barragán-Hervella, Gabriel Jiménez-Armenta Cirugía de Columna.2025; 3(4): 260. CrossRef
Radiographic and clinical outcomes after definitive spine fusion for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis Adam A. Jamnik, Emmanouil Grigoriou, Allen Kadado, Chan-Hee Jo, Nathan Boes, David Thornberg, Dong-Phuong Tran, Brandon Ramo Spine Deformity.2024; 12(1): 149. CrossRef
Measurement of Postoperative Apical Vertebral Rotation Using Radiographic Images in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-Quantitative Evaluation Using Inverse Trigonometric Functions Shun Okuwaki, Toshiaki Kotani, Shuhei Ohyama, Shuhei Iwata, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Yasushi Iijima, Tsutomu Akazawa, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Shohei Minami, Seiji Ohtori, Masashi Yamazaki Spine Surgery and Related Research.2024; 8(2): 203. CrossRef
Factores predisponentes a adding-on en pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente en curvas tipo I y II de Lenke José Antonio Canales Nájera, Antonio Hurtado Padilla, Luis Antonio Guzmán Amoroso Cirugía de Columna.2024; 2(3): 151. CrossRef
Three- instead of two-dimensional evaluation of key parameters alters the choice of the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Pierre Moens, Thomas Overbergh, Steven Cornelis, Anja Van Campenhout, Lieven Moke, Lennart Scheys, Thijs Ackermans Spine Deformity.2023; 11(5): 1137. CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Posterior Spinal Nonfusion Surgery in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using a Bipolar One-Way Self-Expanding Rod System: Protocol for a Single-Center Clinical Cohort Study Anne Mareille Post, Hanneke I Berends, Barend J van Royen JMIR Research Protocols.2023; 12: e47222. CrossRef
The Last Touched Vertebra on Supine Radiographs Can Be the Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Do-Hyoung Kim, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chang-Hyun Lee, Ki-Jeong Kim Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 236. CrossRef
Surgical outcome of minimal invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis Jun Seok Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Su Hun Lee, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song, Young Ha Kim, Chang Hwa Choi Medicine.2022; 101(48): e31879. CrossRef
CORR Insights®: Is the Combination of Convex Compression for the Proximal Thoracic Curve and Concave Distraction for the Main Thoracic Curve Using Separate-rod Derotation Effective for Correcting Shoulder Balance and Thoracic Kyphosis? Kent A. Reinker Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2021; 479(6): 1357. CrossRef
Objective Postoperative dynamic cryo-compression (DC) therapy has been proposed as a method of reducing pain and the inflammatory response in the early postoperative period after orthopedic joint reconstruction surgery. Our aim was to analyze the analgesic efficacy of DC therapy after adult lumbar spinal surgery.
Methods DC was applied for 30 minutes every 6 hours after surgery. Pain was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the preoperative period, immediately after surgery, and every 6 hours postoperatively for the first 72 hours of the hospital stay. Patients’ pain medication requirements were monitored using the patient-controlled analgesia system and patient charts. Twenty patients who received DC therapy were compared to 20 historical controls who were matched for demographic and surgical variables.
Results In the postanesthesia care unit, the mean VAS back pain score was 5.87 ± 0.9 in the DC group and 6.95±1.0 (p=0.001) in the control group. The corresponding mean VAS scores for the DC vs. control groups were 3.8±1.1 vs. 5.4±0.7 (p < 0.001) at 6 hours postoperatively, and 2.7±0.7 vs. 6.25±0.9 (p<0.001) at discharge, respectively. The cumulative mean analgesic consumption of paracetamol, tenoxicam, and tramadol in the DC group vs. control group was 3,733.3±562.7 mg vs. 4,633.3±693.5 mg (p<0.005), 53.3±19.5 mg vs. 85.3±33.4 mg (p<0.005), and 63.3±83.4 mg vs. 393.3±79.9 mg (p<0.0001), respectively.
Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated a positive association between the use of DC therapy and accelerated improvement in patients during early rehabilitation after adult spine surgery compared to patients who were treated with painkillers only.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Graded exposure therapy for adults with persistent symptoms after mTBI: A historical comparison study Mathilde Rioux, Penelope M.A. Brasher, Gabriel McKeown, Keith Owen Yeates, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Deborah L. Snell, Molly Cairncross, William J. Panenka, Grant L. Iverson, Chantel T. Debert, Mark T. Bayley, Cindy Hunt, Matthew J. Burke, Noah D. Silverberg Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2025; 35(7): 1349. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Cryotherapy in Postoperative Residual Low Back Pain After Spine Approach Keyvan Mostofi, Kamran Shirbache, Morad Peyravi American Journal of Therapeutics.2025; 32(2): e214. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approaches to Pain Management in Postoperative Spinal Surgery Patients: Advanced Strategies and Future Directions Dhruba Podder, Olivia Stala, Rahim Hirani, Adam M. Karp, Mill Etienne Neurology International.2025; 17(6): 94. CrossRef
Immediate Effect of Cryo-Compression Therapy on Biomechanical Properties and Perfusion of Forearm Muscles in Mixed Martial Arts Fighters Robert Trybulski, Adrian Kużdżał, Marta Bichowska-Pawęska, Andriy Vovkanych, Adam Kawczyński, Grzegorz Biolik, Jarosław Muracki Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(4): 1177. CrossRef
A novel synergistic device for joint inflammation – efficacy on ankle sprain cases Mayank Shukla, S. S. Agrawal Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology.2022; 46(4): 265. CrossRef
Cold for centuries: a brief history of cryotherapies to improve health, injury and post-exercise recovery Robert Allan, James Malone, Jill Alexander, Salahuddin Vorajee, Mohammed Ihsan, Warren Gregson, Susan Kwiecien, Chris Mawhinney European Journal of Applied Physiology.2022; 122(5): 1153. CrossRef
Is Patient Geography a Risk Factor for Chronic Opioid Use After ACDF? Hannah A. Levy, Brian A. Karamian, Joseph Larwa, Jeffrey Henstenburg, Jose A. Canseco, Brett Haislup, Michael Chang, Parthik Patel, Barrett I. Woods, Alan S. Hilibrand, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder American Journal of Medical Quality.2022; 37(5): 464. CrossRef
Effect of applying cold gel pack on reduction of postoperative pain in cesarean section, low midline skin incision: A randomized controlled trial Pawitra Suwannalert, Athita Chanthasenanont, Densak Pongrojpaw Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2021; 47(8): 2653. CrossRef
Evidence based veterinary medicine: a practice based example Lydia M. Barry Veterinary Nursing Journal.2021; 36(7): 217. CrossRef
Reproducibility of Skin Temperature Response after Cold Stress Test Using the Game Ready System: Preliminary Study Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Alexis Gandia-Soriano, Maria Teresa Pellicer-Chenoll, Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana, Jose Luis Bermejo-Ruiz, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Rosario Salvador-Palmer, Rosa Cibrián Ortiz de Anda International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(16): 8295. CrossRef
Reporte de caso de postcirugía de ligamento cruzado anterior Clara Gualotuña, Thelvia I. Ramos Bionatura.2021; 3(3): 2048. CrossRef
Team Approach: Management of an Acute L4-L5 Disc Herniation Zorica Buser, Gene Tekmyster, Hannah Licari, Justin M. Lantz, Jeffrey C. Wang JBJS Reviews.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Ice therapy: cool, current and complicated B. Wright, P. W. Kronen, D. Lascelles, B. Monteiro, J. C. Murrell, S. Robertson, P. V. M. Steagall, K. Yamashita Journal of Small Animal Practice.2020; 61(5): 267. CrossRef