Clinical Effectiveness of Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Terms of Reducing OPLL Growth Versus Cervical Motion Preservation
Keun Su Kim
Neurospine. 2019;16(3):492-493.   Published online 2019 Sep 30     DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.19edi.012
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
How much space of the spinal canal should be restored by hoisting the vertebrae–OPLL complex for sufficient decompression in anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion? A multicenter clinical radiological study
Chen Yan, Huai-Cheng Jia, Hao-Yuan Tan, Xue-Wei Yu, Ming Li, Xiao-Yi Zhou, Ming-Yuan Yang, Dian-Wen Song, Qing-Hua Zhao, Guo-Zheng Li, Sheng-Hui Tang, Bin-Sheng Yu, Lin-Tao Li, Jing-Chuan Sun, Jian-Gang Shi
The Spine Journal.2021; 21(2): 273.     CrossRef
Laminectomy with instrumented fusion vs. laminoplasty in the surgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A multicenter retrospective study
Jong Joo Lee, Hyung Cheol Kim, Hyeong Seok Jeon, Seong Bae An, Tae Woo Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Hyun Chul Shin, Narihito Nagoshi, Kota Watanabe, Da He, Daniel J. Hoh, K. Daniel Riew, Jun Jae Shin, Yoon Ha
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 94: 271.     CrossRef