Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
Search
Advanced Search
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Corrigendum

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature

Elie Massaad, Nida Fatima, Ali Kiapour, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ganesh M. Shankar, John H. Shin
Neurospine 2020;17(2):473-473.
Published online: June 30, 2020

Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 6,491 Views
  • 98 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
  • 14 Scopus
prev

Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Polyetheretherketone vs Titanium Cages in Spinal Fusion: Spin Bias in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Henry Avetisian, Apurva Prasad, Kevin Mathew, David McCavitt, William J. Karakash, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond J. Hah, Ram K. Alluri
    Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • Titanium Cages versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Mohammad Daher, Marven Aoun, Charbel Farhat, Gaby Kreichati, Khalil Kharrat, Alan H. Daniels, Amer Sebaaly
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 193: 15.     CrossRef
  • Effect of cage surface geometry on load transfer and ranges of motion in a fused lumbar spine model: A comparative finite element analysis
    Tirtharaj Banerjee, Kishore Pradeep, Aritra Karar, Bidyut Pal
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2025; 239(5): 423.     CrossRef
  • 10-Year trend of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and the impact of 3D-printed titanium in a high-volume academic center
    Marco D. Burkhard, Ali E. Guven, Anna-Maria Mielke, Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Torben Stepan, Bruno Verna, Erika Chiapparelli, Jennifer Shue, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Andrew A. Sama, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study
    P. Vanek, N. Svoboda, O. Bradac, J. Malik, R. Kaiser, D. Netuka
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(1): 332.     CrossRef
  • Titanium-coated PEEK Versus Uncoated PEEK Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zheng-tao Lv, Yong Xu, Bin Cao, Jun Dai, Si-yuan Zhang, Jun-ming Huang, Shuang Liang, Feng-xian Jiang
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(5): 198.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes between the n‐HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched‐Pair Case Control Study
    Zhuang Zhang, Bo‐wen Hu, Liang Wang, Hui‐liang Yang, Tao Li, Li‐min Liu, Xi Yang, Yue‐ming Song
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(1): 152.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Qian Chen, Youwei Ai, Yong Huang, Qiujiang Li, Juehan Wang, Hong Ding, Ce Zhu, Ganjun Feng, Limin Liu
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(11): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review
    Elia Marin, Alex Lanzutti
    Materials.2023; 17(1): 114.     CrossRef
  • Development of a decision-making pathway for utilizing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Dominik Adl Amini, Manuel Moser, Lisa Oezel, Jiaqi Zhu, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa, Federico P. Girardi, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(7): 1611.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical analysis of stand-alone lumbar interbody cages versus 360° constructs: an in vitro and finite element investigation
    Ali Kiapour, Elie Massaad, Amin Joukar, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Ganesh M. Shankar, Vijay K. Goel, John H. Shin
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(6): 928.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage
    Dominik Adl Amini, Ichiro Okano, Lisa Oezel, Jiaqi Zhu, Erika Chiapparelli, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa, Federico P. Girardi, Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal.2021; 30(8): 2377.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):473-473.   Published online June 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040058.029.c2
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
Format:
Include:
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2020;17(2):473-473.   Published online June 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040058.029.c2
Close

Related topics

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
NS : Neurospine
Facebook Twitter

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

© Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.