Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a widely accepted treatment for painful osteoporotic compression fractures; it usually provides patients with immediate pain relief. However, long term results have shown a number of complications associated with this popular procedure. These complications are mainly related to migration of cement into the venous system, neural foramina, and posterior spinal canal as well as the generation of cement emboli
9,12). Infections after vertebroplasty are rare; most cases are related to systemic infection prior to the procedure. The patients with infections may be predisposed to develop spondylitis, especially at sites where foreign bodies are retained after hematological dissemination
1,15). To date, there has been only one case of tuberculous spondylitis reported in association with percutaneous vertebroplasty; but the patient presented with several risk factors for tuberculosis (immunosuppressive treatment, liver transplantation and hereditary hemochromatosis)
3). This was different from the case presented here. The present patient had the past history of pulmonary tuberculosis. In fact, we do not know exact etiology of present tuberculous spondylitis after percutaneous vertebroplasty. It was possible that back pain presented as an initial symptom of tuberculous spondylitis. However, she stated recent traumatic history and showed severe osteoporosis on bone mineral densitometry. Based on these findings, we deduced that this case would be osteoporotic compression fracture and performed percutaneous vertebroplasty without bone marrow biopsy. Regretful thing in this patient was the abscence of bone biopsy before percutaneous vertebroplasty. If there were positive results of tuberculous spondylitis, we should not have performed percutaneous vertebroplasty. Indeed, there is possibility of tuberculous spondylitis being initially misdiagnosed as benign compression fracture in spite of evident history of slip down. Although MRI scan is the most accurate imaging study, it still may be difficult to differentiate between tuberculous spondylitis and compression fracture in some cases. Mycobacterium tuberculosis might spread hematogenously and could seed any organ and became latent if the T-cell mediated immunity of the host was sufficiently competent. When immunity has become attenuated due to aging or disease, the latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis may be reactivated and CD4+ T-lymphocytes play a pivotal role in combating the invading intracellular bacteria
6). Scanga et al. reported that depletion of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in a mouse model resulted in a rapid reactivation of previously dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, contributing to an augmented bacterial load and exacerbating the tuberculosis
14). The progression of tuberculous spondylitis is usually insidious and slow. The main symptom, back pain, is not specific, and frequently results in a delayed diagnosis resulting in neurological deficits and more significant vertebral destruction. The clinical presentation together with the radiological appearance of the spine and a positive tuberculin test may suggest tuberculous spondylitis. However, a definitive diagnosis of tuberculous spondylitis is based on the pathological findings. Unfortunately, culture results require more than two or three weeks and usually have a low sensitivity of 50%. Lee et al.
10) reported positive culture results in only 27 out of 47 patients of tuberculous spondylitis (62%). In our patient, bacterial culture tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with the specimens obtained by needle biopsy, did not reveal the causative bacterium. However, PCR technology was a helpful method for expediting the diagnosis and treatment by amplifying DNA in specimens. Park et al.
13) used this technique in 28 patients diagnosed clinically with tuberculosis with the pathological findings of chronic but not granulomatous inflammation; there were 10 positive results in the study and they concluded that PCR technology was helpful for diagnosing such patients. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was likely responsible for the infection of the patient reported here. This is based on the positive PCR results for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the rapid improvement of the markers of infection with the treatment for tuberculosis. Kim and Jung et al.
5,7) reported that a well-defined, abnormal paraspinal signal; a thin, smooth abscess with peripheral enhancement; subligamentous extension to multiple levels, and involvement of the thoracic vertebrae are main characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis rather than pyogenic spondylitis. The current patient underwent posterior fusion with instrumentation due to persistent pain caused by severe kyphotic changes. Ha et al.
4) evaluated the differences in adherence and biofilm formation between Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis on various implant surfaces. Many experimental studies have suggested that Mycobacterium tuberculosis, unlike bacteria, have low adherence to stainless steel and forms less polysaccharide biofilm. Therefore, the use of implants in the presence of spinal tuberculous spondylitis is theoretically safe
11). As the correct diagnosis and adequate treatment is essential, spine surgeons should consider this disease entity to avoid any misdiagnosis or complication. Active investigation including microbiological and preoperative bone biopsy is of utmost importance.