Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 87 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-10.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models”
Neurospine Search

CLOSE


Neurospine > Volume 21(3); 2024 > Article
Yeh and Tsuang: Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models”
ns-2448898-449i1.jpg
Yu-Cheng Yeh
ns-2448898-449i2.jpg
Fon-Yih Tsuang
Artificial intelligence (AI)’s rapid evolution in healthcare has significantly influenced diagnostic processes, particularly in radiology. AI applications now play a key role in fracture detection, including cervical spine fractures, by rapidly analyzing cervical lateral x-ray images. This paper demonstrates how AI models can identify fractures with high accuracy, aligning with global advancements in AI-driven diagnostics [1].
A notable study supporting this transformation is an evaluation of the Aidoc AI decision support system, an U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared AI triaging software [2]. This study showed that the introduction of AI reduced time-to-diagnosis by 16 minutes for patients with cervical spine fractures, while maintaining a high diagnostic accuracy of 94.8% (sensitivity 89.8%, specificity 95.3%). The cumulative time reduction can significantly impact clinical outcomes in high-volume settings, particularly in emergency rooms where timely diagnosis is critical.
However, another study assessing the same system for cervical spine fracture detection revealed a different performance [3]. While the system maintained high specificity (94.1%), its sensitivity was significantly lower at 54.9%, highlighting the need for improved AI systems to handle more complex or subtle fracture cases, particularly chronic fractures. These findings emphasize the importance of refining AI systems to ensure optimal performance across different clinical scenarios.
Additionally, the collaboration between NHS-X and Nanox. AI showcases how AI can effectively identify osteoporotic compression fractures, although not cervical spine fractures [4,5]. This use case demonstrates AI’s broader potential in enhancing radiologists’ efficiency in detecting fractures in vulnerable populations, such as elderly patients. These real-life examples highlight AI’s practical value in improving workflow efficiency and patient outcomes by supporting more timely diagnosis and intervention.
Despite these promising advancements, several real-world challenges must be addressed to facilitate widespread AI adoption in clinical settings. A critical challenge is the variability in imaging data quality and resolution across hospitals. Different institutions utilize various imaging technologies and PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication Systems), leading to discrepancies in AI model performance. AI models trained on high-resolution images from one institution may not generalize well to lower-quality images from another, limiting their broader applicability.
Legal liability is another critical concern. As AI becomes more autonomous in healthcare, questions of accountability arise in cases where the technology misses a diagnosis or provides incorrect information. A recent paper exploring civil liability for autonomous AI in healthcare suggests that traditional doctrines of liability may not be sufficient to address injuries stemming from AI errors [6]. This necessitates a reevaluation of liability frameworks to ensure both developers and healthcare providers are protected while maintaining patient safety.
Moreover, while cervical spine fractures can be identified on lateral x-rays, subtle or complex fractures may only be detected via computed tomography (CT) scans. Future AI systems must be versatile and capable of integrating multiple imaging modalities, including x-rays, CT scans, and magnetic resonance images, to offer a comprehensive solution for fracture detection.
AI should not be seen as a replacement for human expertise but as a complementary tool that enhances clinical workflows. A 2-staged AI-human collaboration system is particularly valuable in high-pressure environments, such as emergency rooms. In this model, AI acts as the first line of screening, efficiently identifying routine cases, while complex or uncertain cases are escalated to human radiologists. This approach not only alleviates the diagnostic workload but also ensures that complex cases receive the attention they require.
A critical factor in AI’s success is minimizing the false-negative rate, particularly in cervical spine fractures, where missed diagnoses might lead to life-altering consequences. Even though the Aidoc AI decision support system achieved high diagnostic accuracy of 94.8% in one study containing 2,974 patients, 22 fractures were missed out of the 2,675 AI-predicted negative cases, and 5 required subsequent stabilizing surgery. These examples emphasize the need for improved AI-human collaboration to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.
Beyond immediate diagnostic applications, AI has significant potential in medical education. AI can be integrated into OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examinations), offering real-time feedback and enabling medical students and professionals to practice fracture detection in simulated environments. AI-enhanced training programs can be particularly beneficial in multiple trauma cases, where quick, accurate decision-making is essential.
In extreme situations, such as mass casualty events or natural disasters, AI can assist by rapidly analyzing imaging data and providing diagnostic support. This ensures that critical cases are prioritized, enabling healthcare providers to respond more effectively in high-stress, resource-limited settings.
AI’s integration into cervical spine fracture detection represents one of the most significant technological advancements in modern healthcare. This paper illustrates AI’s effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy, with its potential to reduce timeto-diagnosis and improve trauma care. However, real-world application requires overcoming challenges related to data variability, legal accountability, and the limitations of existing imaging modalities in specific clinical settings.
AI’s true potential lies in its ability to complement human expertise. Collaborative AI-human systems can enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce workloads, and potentially improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, incorporating AI into medical education will prepare future healthcare professionals to work alongside these technologies, maximizing their clinical impact. As AI continues to evolve, its role in fracture detection and trauma care will undoubtedly expand, shaping the future of medical diagnostics.

NOTES

Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Liawrungrueang W, Han I, Cholamjiak W, et al. Artificial Intelligence detection of cervical spine fractures using convolutional neural network models. Neurospine 2024;21:833-41.
crossref
2. Ruitenbeek HC, Oei EHG, Schmahl BL, et al. Towards clinical implementation of an AI-algorithm for detection of cervical spine fractures on computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2024;173:111375.
crossref pmid
3. Voter AF, Larson ME, Garrett JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and failure mode analysis of a deep learning algorithm for the detection of cervical spine fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1550-6.
crossref pmid pmc
4. First UK spine fracture patients identified by NHS-X and Nanox.AI Artificial Intelligence research study. [Internet] 2023; Available at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-10-20-first-uk-spine-fracture-patients-identified-nhs-x-and-nanoxai-artificial. Accessed September 10, 2024.

5. Javaid K. AI-enabled Detection of Osteoporosis for Treatment (ADOPT study). [Internet] 2023; Available at: https://www.ndorms.ox.ac.uk/research/adopt. Accessed September 10, 2024.

6. Eldakak A, Alremeithi A, Dahiyat E, et al. Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 2024;11:305.
crossref pdf


Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center,
CHA University School of Medicine,
59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13496, Korea
Tel: +82-31-780-1924  Fax: +82-31-780-5269  E-mail: support@e-neurospine.org
The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
#407, Dong-A Villate 2 Town, 350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
Tel: +82-2-585-5455  Fax: +82-2-2-523-6812  E-mail: ksns1987@gmail.com
Business License No.: 209-82-62443

Copyright © The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.

Developed in M2PI

Zoom in Close layer