Surgical Strategy Analysis of Chiari Malformation With or Without Type II Basilar Invagination According to the Morphological Types of the Atlanto-Occipital Joint: A Retrospective Study of 212 Patients
Corresponding Author Yuntao Lu Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, China Email: lllu2000yun@gmail.com
Qinguo Huang and Junhua Ye contributed equally to this work.
• Received: November 5, 2024 • Revised: January 8, 2025 • Accepted: January 10, 2025
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our previous study categorized atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ) morphology into 3 types, with types II and III-AOJ associated with Chiari malformation (CM) with and without type II basilar invagination (II-BI), respectively. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of tailoring surgical strategies for patients with CM based on AOJ morphological types.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 212 CM patients who underwent foramen magnum decompression (FMD) or combined occipitocervical fusion (OCF). Patients were divided into 4 groups: (1) pure CM with II-AOJ who underwent FMD (CM-II-FMD); (2) pure CM with III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (CM-III-OCF); (3) CM-III-FMD; and (4) CM+II-BI with III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (BI-III-OCF). Clinical data, including manifestations, imaging findings, surgical details, and neurological assessments, were analyzed at the final follow-up to assess surgical efficacy.
Results
Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups exhibited a significant improvement in clinical symptoms (pain, sensory disturbances, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction) compared to preoperative levels (p<0.05). Results from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale and Neck Disability Index indicated a significant reduction in the degree of neurological impairment within these groups (p<0.05). Furthermore, the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale scores indicated superior surgical outcomes for patients in these groups. Imaging analyses demonstrated significant reductions in the syringomyelic segment, syringomyelia width, and tonsillar herniation distance among these patients (p<0.05). However, the CM-III-FMD group did not significantly improve in these areas (p>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.3% of FMD+OCF patients and 3.3% of FMD-only patients.
Conclusion
AOJ morphological types can guide surgical treatment strategies for CM with or without II-BI. FMD alone is suitable for II-AOJ cases, whereas III-AOJ cases should be treated with FMD combined with OCF.
The pathogenesis and treatment of Chiari malformations (CMs) with type II basilar invagination (CM+II-BI) remain highly debated [1-3]. Our preliminary study [4] highlighted that patients with CM+II-BI often present with atlanto-occipital instability (AOI), suggesting the need for foramen magnum decompression combined with occipitocervical fusion (FMD+OCF). We categorized the morphology of the atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ) into types I (classic bulb-and-socket joint), II (shallow bulb-and-socket joint), and III (tilted plane joint) [5]. Furthermore, we observed a close correlation between AOJ types and CM with or without II-BI. Specifically, all AOJs in healthy individuals were type I, 87.8% of AOJs in patients with pure CM were type II, and 94.4% of CM+II-BI cases were type III. Interestingly, 6.8% of pure CM cases were classified as type III-AOJ, and 3.7% of CM+II-BI cases were categorized as type II-AOJ. Furthermore, we discovered that all type III-AOJs (100%) exhibited instability, with 1.4% of type II-AOJs also showing instability based on dynamic computed tomography (CT) measurements. Consequently, we questioned whether AOJ morphological types should be the primary consideration when determining OCF.
To address this question, we retrospectively recruited clinical patients with CM and CM+II-BI who underwent surgery at our single center. Through a clinical prognostic assessment, we validated that FMD+OCF should be the primary treatment strategy for type III-AOJ joint instability. Therefore, we aimed to assess the feasibility of tailoring surgical strategies for CM and II-BI patients based on AOJ morphology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Patient Enrollment
We reviewed and screened 1958 medical records of patients admitted to our department from January 2011 to September 2023 who underwent cervical CT examinations. Among these, 812 patients were diagnosed with CM, and 360 eligible patients were enrolled for further analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) confirmed diagnosis of CM (tonsillar hernia extending 5 mm beyond the foramen magnum); (2) absence of significant atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD); (3) absence of a tethered cord, hydrocephalus, or other diseases that may cause tonsillar hernia; (4) absence of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) maldevelopment resulting from osteochondrodysplasia, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or similar syndromes; (5) absence of osteoporosis, spinal degeneration, rheumatism, or other factors contributing to CVJ deformity; (6) treatment with either FMD alone or in conjunction with OCF, without involving dural incision or tonsillectomy; (7) primary surgery was performed, with no history of internal fixation or another cervical fusion surgery; and (8) availability of functional scores and follow-up data. A patient flowchart is presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
2. Study Population and Surgical Strategy
After screening, 298 eligible patients with CM were initially included. Among them, 19 patients declined surgery, 10 were lost to follow-up, 4 missed their follow-up appointments, 1 experienced adverse reaction to anesthesia, and 48 underwent surgical procedures that did not meet study criteria (including dural resection or tonsillectomy) (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Consequently, 216 CM patients, with or without II-BI, who underwent either FMD alone or combined with OCF were retrospectively enrolled. Surgical procedures for FMD and OCF are detailed in our previously publication [4].
Among the 81 patients diagnosed with CM+II-BI, 77 with type III-AOJ underwent FMD+OCF. The remaining 4 patients with II-AOJ, who underwent either FMD alone (2 cases, after the AOJ morphology identification in January 2021) or FMD+OCF (2 cases, before January 2021), were excluded due to their limited number. Among the 135 patients diagnosed with CM, 120 underwent FMD alone, while 15 underwent OCF combined with FMD (after January 2021). Ultimately, all 212 enrolled patients were categorized into 4 groups (Figs. 1, 2 and Table 1): (1) pure CM with type II-AOJ who underwent FMD (CM-II-FMD); (2) pure CM with type III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (CM-III-OCF); (3) CM-III-FMD; and (4) CM+II-BI with type III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (BI-III-OCF).
The same neurosurgeon conducted all surgeries. The distribution of patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, CM-II-FMD, and CM-III-FMD groups was 77, 15, 91, and 29, respectively. Baseline variables were comparable across all treatment groups (Table 2).
3. Data Acquisition and Evaluation
To assess surgical outcomes, we compared patients’ preoperative and final follow-up data, including demographics (sex and age), baseline work status and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class [6], clinical manifestations (symptoms [7], complications, and long-term recovery), imaging findings (syringomyelia length and width, tonsillar herniation length, and cistern magnum volume) [4], and surgical characteristics (operative time and intraoperative blood loss). The data also included neurological assessments using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI; range, 0–100, with higher scores indicating greater disability) [8,9], Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale (range, 0–17, with higher scores indicating less myelopathy) [10], and the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) [11].
All patients underwent routine preoperative neurological assessments and were required to return for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) review at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, followed by annual examinations. The final score was based on the most recent follow-up evaluation.
4. Bias and Ethics
The surgeons involved did not participate in clinical data collection or neurological evaluations to avoid observation bias. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (NFEC-202006-K3) and all individuals participating in this research have provided informed consent.
5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 26.0 (IBM Co.). Craniometric data are presented as the mean±standard deviation. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and sex was compared using the chi-square test. Following normal distribution analysis, a paired t-test (2-tailed) was used to compare the parameters within groups and between preoperative and final follow-up outcomes. Additionally, we conducted intraclass correlation coefficient analyses for the 2 measurers and the same measurer at different time points (interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
For sample size estimate, PASS software (ver. 15.0, NCSS, LLC, UT, USA) was used. A sample size of 45 for group CM-II-FMD achieved more than 90% power to detect a mean paired differences of 0.90, with an estimated standard deviation of 1.53 based on the pilot test, accounting for a 20% dropout rate. The power for the change was calculated based on a 2-sided paired t-test and a 1-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significance level of 5%. The sample sizes for group BI-III-OCF, group CM-III-FMD, group CM-III-OCF were 38, 14, and 7, respectively.
RESULTS
1. Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliabilities
The intraclass correlation coefficient of the 2 measures at all data points ranged from 0.91 to 0.96 (p<0.01). Conversely, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the same measurer at 2-time points ranged from 0.92 to 0.98 (p<0.01). These results indicate high consistency in the data.
2. Surgery-Related Parameters
As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, patients who underwent the same surgical strategy exhibited similar data on surgery-related parameters (p>0.05). However, irrespective of whether patients had CM or CM+II-BI, those undergoing OCF experienced longer operating times, greater surgical bleeding, and extended hospital stays compared to those undergoing FMD (p<0.05). Among patients with type III-AOJ CM, those who underwent OCF exhibited similar characteristics to those who underwent pure FMD.
3. Surgical Outcomes
1) Clinical manifestations
During the last follow-up, patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups showed significant improvements in pain, sensory disturbance, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction (p<0.05) (Fig. 3). However, patients in the CM-III-FMD group showed no improvement in these symptoms. The VAS scores for pain (Fig. 4) revealed significant reductions in occipitocervical pain, neuropathic pain, and headache among the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups (p<0.05). Conversely, these types of pain were not alleviated in the CM-III-FMD group. Among CM patients with type III-AOJ, those undergoing OCF showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms compared to pure FMD cases (Fig. 5).
2) Neurologic assessment
The statistical results of the JOA-17 and NDI (Fig. 6A) revealed that the degree of neurological deficits in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups was significantly reduced at the latest follow-up. In contrast, this phenomenon was not observed in the CM-III-FMD group. The degree of improvement in neurological impairment was significantly higher in the CM-III-OCF group than in the CM-III-FMD group (Fig. 6B and Table 1). Furthermore, 77.9%, 94.5%, and 93.3% of patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups, respectively, had CCOS scores>12 points, indicating good surgical outcomes. Conversely, only 2 patients (6.9%) in the III-FMD group scored>12 points (Fig. 7).
3) Imaging findings
At the most recent follow-up, patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups exhibited significant improvements in the number of syringomyelic segments, syringomyelia width, tonsillar herniation distance, and cistern magnum volume (p<0.05). However, the CM-III-FMD group did not demonstrate similar improvements in the MRI results (Fig. 8A). Furthermore, the improvement in imaging parameters in the CM-III-OCF group significantly surpassed that of the CM-III-FMD group (Fig. 8B).
4) Complications
In the BI-III-OCF group, 4 patients (5.2%) experienced postoperative complications, including 2 (2.6%) classified as major complications. No patients in the CM-III-OCF group (0%) experienced postoperative complications. Three patients in the CM-II-FMD group (3.3%) and 1 patient in the CM-III-FMD group (3.4%) had postoperative complications, all of which were minor (Supplementary Table 2). From another perspective, complications occurred in 4 patients undergoing FMD+OCF (4.3%) and 4 undergoing FMD alone (3.3%).
DISCUSSION
The treatment of craniocervical junction malformations has progressed over the past 6 decades [1], with experts like Menezes from the United States [12], Klekamp from Germany [13], and Goel from India [14] contributing valuable insights. However, no universally accepted treatment strategy or consistently satisfactory outcomes exist for CM and II-BI patients. Understanding the disease’s pathogenesis is crucial for developing surgical treatment strategies. Currently, discussions primarily revolve around the rationale for decompression versus fixation. Decompression advocates argue for posterior cranial fossa (PCF) overcrowding [1,11], while fixation proponents suggest AAD as the primary issue [15,16]. Our previous research, however, revealed pathogenic differences between CM and II-BI, particularly in the morphology and stability of the AOJ [5]. We hypothesized that treatment strategies should be tailored to AOJ morphological types. Therefore, this study was designed to validate this approach through clinical follow-up and prognostic evaluation.
A previous study categorized the adult AOJ into 3 morphological types (Fig. 2) [5]. Type I-AOJ represents a typical bulb-and-socket structure characterized by a concave-shaped articular surface of the lateral mass of the atlas, forming a bulb-and-socket joint with a nearly spherical, protruding occipital condyle. Type II-AOJ exhibits a shallow bulb-and-socket joint where the bulb-and-socket shape is still discernible. Type III-AOJ is character-ized by a tilted plane joint with severe deformities, resulting in the complete disappearance of the bulb-and-socket morphology. As reported by Klimo et al. [17] dynamic CT imaging in flexion and extension positions indicates potential AOI if the distance between the anterior margin of the occipital condyle and the atlas lateral mass is more than 1.0 mm. Based on this criterion, AOI is identified when there is a C0–1 distance change value exceeding 1.0 mm. Types I-AOJ and II-AOJ, associated with minimal AOI, are predominantly found in healthy individuals and patients with pure CM, respectively. In contrast, type III-AOJ represents an unstable joint morphology primarily distributed in patients with CM+II-BI. Moreover, we observed that some pure CM patients exhibited type III-AOJ, while a small subset of II-BI patients had type II-AOJ. This realization suggests that previous surgical treatment strategies based solely on disease type may not have been optimal. Considering the correlation between joint morphology and stability, we propose that OCF should be considered for patients with unstable type III-AOJ. Conversely, traditional FMD may be more appropriate for patients without type III-AOJ, aligning better with their pathological mechanism.
Morphologically, type III-AOJ features vanishing posterior protuberances on the atlas’s lateral masses, increased atlas tilt, and occipital condyle sliding (Fig. 1A). This leads to degeneration and eventual AOI. While joint fixation is necessary for type III-AOJ, we propose OCF as the primary treatment rather than the atlantoaxial fixation which was suggested by Goel [15] In our previous study [4], we described the presence of atlantoaxial instability in patients with II-BI, characterized by left-right asymmetrical motion and rotational instability. Aatlantoaxial instability in type II-BI differs from that in type I-BI, with atlantoaxial-related ligaments in patients with II-BI remain normal. This was confirmed by the unchanged atlantodental distance and odontoid positioning relative to the McRae line (Fig. 1A). Xia et al. [18] demonstrated that odontoid process and lateral joint deformities might be the primary causes of AAD in BI. However, our morphological study found no corresponding changes in patients with II-BI [5]. Given that the atlantoaxial joint is the most active joint in the human body, we propose that AOJ instability in II-BI is likely secondary to AOI, causing upper cervical spine imbalance characterized by unstable left-right movement, including a deviation of the odontoid process. Hence, asymmetric movement resulting from abnormal bone development in the AOJ may initiate upper cervical spine instability in II-BI. The favorable prognosis of patients in the BI-III-OCF and CM-III-OCF groups in this study supports this theory, suggesting OCF as the preferred treatment for patients with type III-AOJ.
Our previous study revealed decreased clivoaxial angles (CXAs) and increased ventral compression in patients with II-BI or type III-AOJ [4]. The CXA is increasingly recognized as an important indicator for assessing the risk of ventral brainstem compression [19,20]. A decreased CXA can elevate axial stress on the brainstem, resulting in ventral compression and clinical deterioration. Correcting postoperative CXA improves clinical outcomes [21]. Hence, expanding the CXA and reversing ventral compression during surgery is crucial. To address this, we use intervertebral distractors to release atlas axis joints, implant angled facet spacers to pull down the odontoid process, and perform OCF with cantilever techniques. Subsequently, OCF was conducted using cantilever techniques. This approach not only allows for the pulldown of the odontoid process, but also facilitates the realization of bilateral anterior open-mouth atlantoaxial facets to easily expand the CXA.
Out of the 121 patients with type III-AOJ in this cohort, 77 were diagnosed with CM+II-BI, all of whom received treatment with FMD+OCF. Another 44 patients were diagnosed with pure CM, with 29 and 15 patients undergoing simple FMD and FMD+OCF, respectively. Clinical follow-up results (Figs. 3–6, and 8) indicate that regardless of whether the patients had pure CM or CM+II-BI, employing FMD+OCF yielded favorable outcomes when III-AOJ was present. Conversely, simple FMD did not yield benefits; instead, the condition of these patients deteriorated. These findings support our previous systematic morphological studies [5], suggesting AOJ instability is a key pathogenic factor in type III-AOJ, alongside PCF stenosis. The poor outcomes with simple FMD challenge the view that CM and II-BI are unrelated to mechanical instability [2,22,23].
Ultimately, even if OCF is chosen, FMD remains indispensable and cannot serve as a substitute treatment for patients with III-AOJ. While our research indicates that CVJ instability is the primary pathogenic factor, the shortening of the clivus and supraocciput results in a narrow PCF, which serves as a compelling reason for secondary tonsillar herniation and represents another mechanism for III-AOJ occurrence [5]. Clinical follow-up results (Figs. 5, 6, and 8) further underscore the importance of considering PCF decompression and AOJ stability reconstruction when devising treatment strategies in treating III-AOJ. Employing either method alone proved ineffective, underscoring the necessity of combining both techniques [1,3,13,19].
Except for patients with III-AOJ, 91 patients with II-AOJ were diagnosed with pure CM in this cohort, all of whom underwent simple FMD. The clinical follow-up results (Figs. 3, 4, 6, and 8) show that if CM patients do not exhibit III-AOJ morphology, simple FMD yields favorable outcomes. This suggests that overcrowding of the PCF due to skull base deformities, particularly clivus deformities, remains the most probable mechanism for II-AOJ, consistent with previous reports [24-26]. Unfortunately, patients in the CM-II-OCF group were excluded from this study due to their small cohort size, limiting the clinical evidence for the efficacy of OCF in treating patients with II-AOJ. However, employing simple FMD has benefited patients. At the same time, OCF inherently carries drawbacks such as limited neck mobility, high implantation cost, and additional bleeding (Supplementary Fig. 2) [27]. Therefore, we are confident that simple FMD represents the optimal treatment strategy for patients with II-AOJ.
In addition to the inherent limitations of selection bias and confounding factors in retrospective observational studies, this study is limited by significant sample size and follow-up time disparities among the 4 groups and insufficient sample sizes in certain groups. Additionally, since we did not discover the 3 morphological types of AOJ and their correlation with joint stability until January 2021, this directly resulted in a shorter follow-up period for the CM-III-OCF group compared to others. Nevertheless, the average follow-up time of 2.5 years might still be sufficient to demonstrate the surgical outcomes. Therefore, we are conducting a prospective clinical study to better elucidate the rationale behind formulating surgical strategies for CM or II-BI based on AOJ morphological types. Of course, this retrospective study can also provide some evidence for this approach.
CONCLUSION
Developing surgical treatment strategies for patients with CM and CM+II-BI based on AOJ morphology may be a reasonable approach. If the patient exhibits type III-AOJ, PCF decompression and AOJ stability reconstruction should be emphasized, using FMD combined with OCF.
Statistical data for surgery-related parameters. (A) Surgery-related parameters across the 4 groups were analyzed. The data on 3 surgery-related parameters were similar between the 2 groups undergoing FMD (CM-II-FMD and CM-III-FMD) (p>0.05). Similarly, the data on these 3 parameters were similar between the 2 groups undergoing OCF (BI-III-OCF and CM-III-OCF) (p>0.05). (B) Surgery-related parameters of patients with CM undergoing different treatment strategies. The operating times, extent of surgical bleeding, and length of hospital stays of patients undergoing OCF (BI-III-OCF and CM-III-OCF) surpassed those of patients undergoing FMD (CM-II-FMD and CM-III-FMD) (p<0.05). (C) Surgery-related parameters of patients with type III-AOJ CM. Among the patients with pure CM exhibiting type III-AOJ, the operating times, extent of surgical bleeding, and length of hospital stays of those receiving OCF were longer compared to those receiving FMD (p<0.05). BI, basilar invagination; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. p>0.05.
This work was supported by the General Programs from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972355 and 82373398 to Y. T. L.), the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2023409 to Q. G. H.), the National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019B151502048 to Y. T. L.), the Shantou Medical Health Science and Technology Plan (220518116490852 to Q. G. H.), the National Key Clinical Specialty Project, and the Clinical Research Program of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (2021CR018 to Y. T. L.).
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dan Chen for her assistance with the statistical analysis of this study.
Imaging findings of patients in the 4 groups. (A) Imaging findings of the BI-III-OCF group. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images indicate BI (a) and AOI (b, c). (a) This image shows that the odontoid tip is more than 5 mm above the Chamberlain line (yellow dotted line), which extends from the hard palate to the opisthion. No increase occurred in the atlantodental distance or dislocation of the odontoid process relative to McRae line (yellow solid line), a radiographic line drawn from the basion to the opisthion. (b, c) Simultaneously, the joint surface of the AOJ became abnormally flat, and the ball-and-socket joint shape vanished. The posterior protuberances of the superior articular surfaces on the lateral masses of the atlas (red star mark) almost disappeared, with the atlas tilt angle (green angle) increasing and the occipital condyle sliding backward and downward on the superior articular surfaces of the atlas. At this point, pathological translational movement occurs at the AOJ (red dotted line), indicating a loss of the normal contraposition relationship of the articular surface, which is a natural outcome and evidence of potential AOI. (d, e) Postoperative CT showing OCF with the occipital plate and cervical lateral mass screws in place. (f) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (g) Postoperative MRI showing significant improvements in syringomyelia length and width, as well as a reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. (B) Imaging findings in the CM-II-FMD group. Preoperative CT images showing no BI (a) or AOI (b, c). (a) The atlantodental distance does not increase, and the odontoid process is not dislocated relative to the Chamberlain line (yellow dotted line). (b, c) Morphologically, although the articular surface of type II-AOJ became flat, the atlas tilt angle (green angle) did not increase. The anterior and posterior protrusions (red star marks) still exist and can limit the anterior and posterior translations of the occipital condyle. Therefore, there is no translational activity in the AOJ, indicating the absence of AOI. (d) Preoperative MRI suggested tonsillar hernia malformation but no syringomyelia. (e) Owing to the absence of OCF, no routine cervical CT examination was conducted after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed that the tonsillar herniation distance was significantly reduced. (C) Imaging findings of the CM-III-OCF group. Preoperative CT images show no BI (a) but the presence of AOI (b, c). The atlantodental distance did not increase. (a) The odontoid process is not dislocated in relation to the Chamberlain (yellow dotted line) or McRae (yellow solid line) lines. (d, e) Postoperative CT showing OCF with the occipital plate and cervical lateral mass screws in place. (f) Preoperative MRI images suggest tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (g) Postoperative MRI showing significant improvements in syringomyelia length and width, along with a reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. (D) Imaging findings of the CM-III-FMD group. Preoperative CT images show no BI (a) but the presence of AOI (b, c). (a) The atlantodental distance did not increase, and the odontoid process was not dislocated in relation to the Chamberlain (yellow dotted line) or McRae (yellow solid line) lines. (d) Preoperative MRI images suggest tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (e) Owing to the absence of an OCF, no routine cervical CT examination was performed after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed no significant improvement in syringomyelia width and no reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. Fig. 1 indicates that in type III-AOJ, the presence of AOI can be visually observed on imaging. However, for diagnosing AOI, we use a diagnostic criterion based on dynamic CT imaging. According to Klimo et al. [17] dynamic CT imaging in flexion and extension positions shows that a change of more than 1.0 mm in the C0–1 distance (the distance between the anterior margin of the occipital condyle and the atlas lateral mass) indicates potential AOI. AOI is diagnosed when this criterion is met. In patients with pure CM, AOI occurs exclusively on one side (100%), while in patients with CM+II-BI, AOI most often occurs bilaterally (92.6%). Additionally, AOI occurs in all cases of type III-AOJ (100%), rarely in type II-AOJ (1.5%), but never in type I-AOJ (0%). BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; AOI, atlanto-occipital instability; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; FMD, foramen magnum decompression.
Fig. 2.
Classification of the atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ) based on morphological features. (A–C) Morphological features of type I-AOJ are depicted in a schematic diagram (A), a 3-dimensional (3D) geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (B), and the patient’s cervical computed tomography (CT) image (C). The I-AOJ is characterized by a typical ball-and-socket structure. When viewed from the side, the superior articular facet of adult C1-lateral mass (LM) shows anterior and posterior articular processes with similar heights, with the posterior process being slightly lower. This configuration results in a concave morphology of the superior articular facet. It articulates with the nearly spherical convex C0 to form a ball-and-socket joint. (D-F) Morphological features of type II-AOJ are illustrated in a schematic diagram (D), a 3D geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (E), and the patient’s cervical CT image (F). In type II-AOJ, the overall size of C0 and the C1-LM remains unchanged, and the height difference between the anterior and posterior articular processes of the superior articular facet of C1-LM is essentially maintained. However, the intermediate articular fossa becomes slightly shallower compared to type I-AOJ. Nevertheless, the ball-and-socket morphology of the AOJ is still evident. (G–I) Morphological features of type III-AOJ are shown in a schematic diagram (G), a 3D geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (H), and the patient’s cervical CT image (I). Type III-AOJ exhibits more severe deformity, characterized by the complete disappearance of the balland-socket joint morphology. The normal spherical convexity of C0 is no longer present, transforming into a significantly flattened and overall smaller bony configuration. The anterior and posterior articular processes of the superior articular facet of C1-LM are underdeveloped, with the posterior process being the almost absent. This leads to the loss of the central concavity and lateral prominence of the fossa-like morphology. Instead, the articular surface takes on a backward sloping plane shape, indicating a significant increase in the articular surface inclination angle. In the preliminary study,5 it was found that the depth of the AOJ (defined as the depth of the superior articular facet of the atlas LM) and its curvature (the ratio of the depth to the length of the superior articular facet of the atlas LM) could serve as potential indicators for predicting different types of AOJ morphologies. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic thresholds for these 2 indices across various joint morphology types. The results indicated that for type II-AOJ, the optimal cutoff point for AOJ depth was 3.69 mm, and for AOJ curvature, it was 0.2; for type III-AOJ, the optimal cutoff point for AOJ depth was 2.71 mm, and for AOJ curvature, it was 0.13.
Fig. 3.
Scores for the clinical symptoms assessed across the 4 groups. (please refer to Klekamp et al. [7]. (A) Comparison of score of pain. (B) Comparison of score of sensory disturbance. (C) Comparison of score of motor weakness. (D) Comparison of score of gait ataxia. (E, F) Comparison of score of bladder and bowel dysfunction. (G) Comparison of score of dysphagia/labored breathing. (H) Comparison of scores of stiff neck. (A–F) Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups showed significant improvements in pain, sensory disturbance, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction (p<0.05). However, patients in the CM-III-FMD group showed no improvement in these symptoms, with sensory disturbance, gait ataxia, bowel dysfunction and stiff neck worsening. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. *p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 4.
Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the 3 types of pain assessed across the 4 groups. (A) Comparison of VAS scores of occipitocervical pain. (B) Comparison of VAS scores of neuropathic pain. (C) Comparison of VAS scores of headache. (A–C) Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores for occipitocervical pain, neuropathic pain, and headache (p<0.05). These 3 types of pain were not alleviated in the CM-III-FMD group. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 5.
Clinical manifestation of patients with CM possessing type III-AOJ. (A) Postoperative scores of clinical symptoms of CM patients with type III-AOJ. (B) Postoperative visual analogue scores of 3 types of pain of CM patients with type III-AOJ. (A–B) Among patients with pure CM and type III-AOJ, most postoperative clinical symptoms (including the 3 types of pain, sensory disturbance, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction) were significantly more alleviated in those undergoing OCF compared to those undergoing FMD (p<0.05). CM, Chiari malformation; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 6.
Statistical data on neurological assessment parameters. (A) Neurological assessment results of the 4 groups. The degree of neurological impairment was significantly reduced in the BI-III-OCF, CM-II-FMD, and CM-III-OCF groups (p<0.05), but not in the CM-III-FMD group. (B) Neurological assessment results of CM patients with type III-AOJ. Among patients with pure CM exhibiting type III-AOJ, postoperative neurological function was significantly better in those who underwent OCF compared to those who underwent FMD (p<0.05). Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; NDI, Neck Disability Index; BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 7.
Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) scores of patients with CM and CM+II-BI. (A) CCOS scores in the BI-III-OCF group. Of the 4 items (pain, nonpain, functionality, and complications), most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 92.2%, 77.9%, 96.1%, and 96.1%, respectively. Regarding the total score, 77.9% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (B) CCOS scores in the CM-II-FMD group. Of the 4 items, most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 97.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 98.9%. In terms of the total score, 94.5% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (C) CCOS scores in the CM-III-OCF group. Of the 4 items, most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 100.0%, 93.3%, 100.0%, and 100.0%. In terms of the total score, 93.3% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (D) CCOS scores in the CM-III-FMD group. Among the 3 items (pain, nonpain, and functionality), only a small percentage of patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 40.0%, 10.3%, and 41.4%. In terms of the total score, only a small percentage of patients scored no less than 13 points, accounting for 6.9%. CM, Chiari malformation; BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression.
Fig. 8.
Statistical data on imaging parameters. (A) Imaging findings across the 4 groups. Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-II-FMD, and CM-III-OCF groups showed significant improvements in the number of syringomyelic segments, syringomyelia width, tonsillar herniation distance, and cistern magnum volume (p<0.05). (B) Imaging findings in patients with CM with type III-AOJ. The change in the syringomyelic segment, tonsillar herniation, and syringomyelia width were calculated by subtracting preoperative data from postoperative data, with a positive number indicating improvement. Improvements in these parameters were greater in the CM-III-OCF group than in the CM-III-FMD group. The syringomyelic segment and tonsil herniation worsened in the CM-III-FMF group. The change in cistern magnum volume was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurements from the postoperative measurements, with a positive number indicating an improvement. Patients in the CM-III-OCF group showed significant improvement in this parameter after surgery, whereas those in the CM-III-FMF group exhibited deterioration. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; CM, Chiari malformation; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint. *p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Table 1.
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative NDI and JOA in Chiari malformation patients with type III atlanto-occipital joint
Table 1.
Variable
CM-III-OCF (n = 15)
CM-III-FMD (n = 29)
Estimated between-group difference in mean change (95% CI)
p-value
NDI
Mean value at baseline
28.1 ± 9.3
27.3 ± 16.1
-
Mean value at final follow-up
8.8 ± 3.0
28.9 ± 15.9
-
Final follow-up mean change from baseline
19.3 ± 8.0
-1.6 ± 10.1
21.0 (15.2–26.6)
< 0.001
JOA
Mean value at baseline
13.2 ± 1.8
12.8 ± 1.5
-
Mean value at final follow-up
15.9 ± 1.0
11.9 ± 2.4
-
Final follow-up mean change from baseline
2.7 ± 1.5
-0.9 ± 1.5
3.6 (2.6–4.5)
< 0.001
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
NDI, Neck Disability Index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; CM, Chiari malformation; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; CI, confidence interval.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristic of all patients by actual treatment groups
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) unless otherwise indicated.
BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; NDI, Neck Disability Index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
*The ASA physical status classification is used to assess a patient’s physical health and comorbidities to predict perioperative risk prior to surgery. Patients with class IV status (systemic disease that is life threatening) or higher were excluded from the study [6].
†The NDI ranges from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing less disability. A typical patient with moderate neck pain and disability would have a score between 20 and 40 [8,9].
‡The JOA scale ranges from 0 to 17, with higher scores representing less dysfunction due to myelopathy. A typical patient with moderate cervical myelopathy has an JOA score between 12 and 14. Many surgical studies show that patients with cervical myelopathy have JOA scores in this range [10].
REFERENCES
1. Joaquim A, Tedeschi H, Chandra P. Controversies in the surgical management of congenital craniocervical junction disorders - a critical review. Neurology India 2018;66:1003-15.
2. Wagner A, Grassner L, Kögl N, et al. Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability: a literature review and critical analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020;162:1553-63.
4. Zhou Q, Song C, Huang Q, et al. Evaluating craniovertebral stability in Chiari malformation coexisting with type II basilar invagination: an observational study based on kinematic computed tomography and its clinical application. World Neurosurg 2022;164:e724-40.
5. Huang Q, Yang X, Zheng D, et al. Exploring the pathogenesis of atlanto-occipital instability in Chiari malformation with type II basilar invagination: a systematic morphological study. Neurosurgery 2023;92:837-53.
6. Hurwitz E, Simon M, Vinta S, et al. Adding examples to the ASA-physical status classification improves correct assignment to patients. Anesthesiology 2017;126:614-22.
7. Klekamp J. Surgical treatment of Chiari I malformation—analysis of intraoperative findings, complications, and outcome for 371 foramen magnum decompressions. Neurosurgery 2012;71:365-80. discussion 380.
8. Badhiwala J, Witiw C, Nassiri F, et al. Patient phenotypes associated with outcome following surgery for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy: a principal component regression analysis. Spine J 2018;18:2220-31.
9. Ghogawala Z, Terrin N, Dunbar M, et al. Effect of ventral vs dorsal spinal surgery on patient-reported physical functioning in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325:942-51.
10. Tetreault L, Nouri A, Kopjar B, et al. The minimum clinically important difference of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1653-9.
11. Aliaga L, Hekman K, Yassari R, et al. A novel scoring system for assessing Chiari malformation type I treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 2012;70:656-64. discussion 664-5.
14. Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002;51:1351-6. discussion 1356-7.
15. Goel A. Is atlantoaxial instability the cause of Chiari malformation? Outcome analysis of 65 patients treated by atlantoaxial fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;22:116-27.
16. Goel A, Sathe P, Shah A. Atlantoaxial fixation for basilar invagination without obvious atlantoaxial instability (group B basilar invagination): outcome analysis of 63 surgically treated cases. World Neurosurg 2017;99:164-70.
18. Xia Z, Duan W, Zhao X, et al. Computed tomography imaging study of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation. World Neurosurg 2018;114:e501-7.
19. Bollo R, Riva-Cambrin J, Brockmeyer M, et al. Complex Chiari malformations in children: an analysis of preoperative risk factors for occipitocervical fusion. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;10:134-41.
21. Henderson FC Sr, Henderson FC Jr, Wilson WA 4th, et al. Utility of the clivo-axial angle in assessing brainstem deformity: pilot study and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2018;41:149-63.
23. Duan W, Chou D, Jiang B, et al. Posterior revision surgery using an intraarticular distraction technique with cage grafting to treat atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;31:525-33.
24. Botelho R, Heringer L, Botelho P, et al. Posterior fossa dimensions of Chiari malformation patients compared with normal subjects: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2020;138:521-9.e2.
25. Noudel R, Jovenin N, Eap C, et al. Incidence of basioccipital hypoplasia in Chiari malformation type I: comparative morphometric study of the posterior cranial fossa. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009;111:1046-52.
26. Aydin S, Hanimoglu H, Tanriverdi T, et al. Chiari type I malformations in adults: a morphometric analysis of the posterior cranial fossa. Surg Neurol 2005;64:237-41. discussion 241.
27. Salunke P, Karthigeyan M, Malik P, et al. Changing Perception but unaltered reality: how effective is C1-C2 fixation for Chiari malformations without instability? World Neurosurg 2020;136:e234-44.
Surgical Strategy Analysis of Chiari Malformation With or Without Type II Basilar Invagination According to the Morphological Types of the Atlanto-Occipital Joint: A Retrospective Study of 212 Patients
Fig. 1. Imaging findings of patients in the 4 groups. (A) Imaging findings of the BI-III-OCF group. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images indicate BI (a) and AOI (b, c). (a) This image shows that the odontoid tip is more than 5 mm above the Chamberlain line (yellow dotted line), which extends from the hard palate to the opisthion. No increase occurred in the atlantodental distance or dislocation of the odontoid process relative to McRae line (yellow solid line), a radiographic line drawn from the basion to the opisthion. (b, c) Simultaneously, the joint surface of the AOJ became abnormally flat, and the ball-and-socket joint shape vanished. The posterior protuberances of the superior articular surfaces on the lateral masses of the atlas (red star mark) almost disappeared, with the atlas tilt angle (green angle) increasing and the occipital condyle sliding backward and downward on the superior articular surfaces of the atlas. At this point, pathological translational movement occurs at the AOJ (red dotted line), indicating a loss of the normal contraposition relationship of the articular surface, which is a natural outcome and evidence of potential AOI. (d, e) Postoperative CT showing OCF with the occipital plate and cervical lateral mass screws in place. (f) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (g) Postoperative MRI showing significant improvements in syringomyelia length and width, as well as a reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. (B) Imaging findings in the CM-II-FMD group. Preoperative CT images showing no BI (a) or AOI (b, c). (a) The atlantodental distance does not increase, and the odontoid process is not dislocated relative to the Chamberlain line (yellow dotted line). (b, c) Morphologically, although the articular surface of type II-AOJ became flat, the atlas tilt angle (green angle) did not increase. The anterior and posterior protrusions (red star marks) still exist and can limit the anterior and posterior translations of the occipital condyle. Therefore, there is no translational activity in the AOJ, indicating the absence of AOI. (d) Preoperative MRI suggested tonsillar hernia malformation but no syringomyelia. (e) Owing to the absence of OCF, no routine cervical CT examination was conducted after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed that the tonsillar herniation distance was significantly reduced. (C) Imaging findings of the CM-III-OCF group. Preoperative CT images show no BI (a) but the presence of AOI (b, c). The atlantodental distance did not increase. (a) The odontoid process is not dislocated in relation to the Chamberlain (yellow dotted line) or McRae (yellow solid line) lines. (d, e) Postoperative CT showing OCF with the occipital plate and cervical lateral mass screws in place. (f) Preoperative MRI images suggest tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (g) Postoperative MRI showing significant improvements in syringomyelia length and width, along with a reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. (D) Imaging findings of the CM-III-FMD group. Preoperative CT images show no BI (a) but the presence of AOI (b, c). (a) The atlantodental distance did not increase, and the odontoid process was not dislocated in relation to the Chamberlain (yellow dotted line) or McRae (yellow solid line) lines. (d) Preoperative MRI images suggest tonsillar hernia malformation and syringomyelia. (e) Owing to the absence of an OCF, no routine cervical CT examination was performed after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed no significant improvement in syringomyelia width and no reduction in tonsillar herniation distance. Fig. 1 indicates that in type III-AOJ, the presence of AOI can be visually observed on imaging. However, for diagnosing AOI, we use a diagnostic criterion based on dynamic CT imaging. According to Klimo et al. [17] dynamic CT imaging in flexion and extension positions shows that a change of more than 1.0 mm in the C0–1 distance (the distance between the anterior margin of the occipital condyle and the atlas lateral mass) indicates potential AOI. AOI is diagnosed when this criterion is met. In patients with pure CM, AOI occurs exclusively on one side (100%), while in patients with CM+II-BI, AOI most often occurs bilaterally (92.6%). Additionally, AOI occurs in all cases of type III-AOJ (100%), rarely in type II-AOJ (1.5%), but never in type I-AOJ (0%). BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; AOI, atlanto-occipital instability; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; FMD, foramen magnum decompression.
Fig. 2. Classification of the atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ) based on morphological features. (A–C) Morphological features of type I-AOJ are depicted in a schematic diagram (A), a 3-dimensional (3D) geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (B), and the patient’s cervical computed tomography (CT) image (C). The I-AOJ is characterized by a typical ball-and-socket structure. When viewed from the side, the superior articular facet of adult C1-lateral mass (LM) shows anterior and posterior articular processes with similar heights, with the posterior process being slightly lower. This configuration results in a concave morphology of the superior articular facet. It articulates with the nearly spherical convex C0 to form a ball-and-socket joint. (D-F) Morphological features of type II-AOJ are illustrated in a schematic diagram (D), a 3D geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (E), and the patient’s cervical CT image (F). In type II-AOJ, the overall size of C0 and the C1-LM remains unchanged, and the height difference between the anterior and posterior articular processes of the superior articular facet of C1-LM is essentially maintained. However, the intermediate articular fossa becomes slightly shallower compared to type I-AOJ. Nevertheless, the ball-and-socket morphology of the AOJ is still evident. (G–I) Morphological features of type III-AOJ are shown in a schematic diagram (G), a 3D geometric model constructed from a patient’s cervical CT data (H), and the patient’s cervical CT image (I). Type III-AOJ exhibits more severe deformity, characterized by the complete disappearance of the balland-socket joint morphology. The normal spherical convexity of C0 is no longer present, transforming into a significantly flattened and overall smaller bony configuration. The anterior and posterior articular processes of the superior articular facet of C1-LM are underdeveloped, with the posterior process being the almost absent. This leads to the loss of the central concavity and lateral prominence of the fossa-like morphology. Instead, the articular surface takes on a backward sloping plane shape, indicating a significant increase in the articular surface inclination angle. In the preliminary study,5 it was found that the depth of the AOJ (defined as the depth of the superior articular facet of the atlas LM) and its curvature (the ratio of the depth to the length of the superior articular facet of the atlas LM) could serve as potential indicators for predicting different types of AOJ morphologies. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic thresholds for these 2 indices across various joint morphology types. The results indicated that for type II-AOJ, the optimal cutoff point for AOJ depth was 3.69 mm, and for AOJ curvature, it was 0.2; for type III-AOJ, the optimal cutoff point for AOJ depth was 2.71 mm, and for AOJ curvature, it was 0.13.
Fig. 3. Scores for the clinical symptoms assessed across the 4 groups. (please refer to Klekamp et al. [7]. (A) Comparison of score of pain. (B) Comparison of score of sensory disturbance. (C) Comparison of score of motor weakness. (D) Comparison of score of gait ataxia. (E, F) Comparison of score of bladder and bowel dysfunction. (G) Comparison of score of dysphagia/labored breathing. (H) Comparison of scores of stiff neck. (A–F) Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups showed significant improvements in pain, sensory disturbance, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction (p<0.05). However, patients in the CM-III-FMD group showed no improvement in these symptoms, with sensory disturbance, gait ataxia, bowel dysfunction and stiff neck worsening. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. *p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 4. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the 3 types of pain assessed across the 4 groups. (A) Comparison of VAS scores of occipitocervical pain. (B) Comparison of VAS scores of neuropathic pain. (C) Comparison of VAS scores of headache. (A–C) Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores for occipitocervical pain, neuropathic pain, and headache (p<0.05). These 3 types of pain were not alleviated in the CM-III-FMD group. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 5. Clinical manifestation of patients with CM possessing type III-AOJ. (A) Postoperative scores of clinical symptoms of CM patients with type III-AOJ. (B) Postoperative visual analogue scores of 3 types of pain of CM patients with type III-AOJ. (A–B) Among patients with pure CM and type III-AOJ, most postoperative clinical symptoms (including the 3 types of pain, sensory disturbance, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction) were significantly more alleviated in those undergoing OCF compared to those undergoing FMD (p<0.05). CM, Chiari malformation; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 6. Statistical data on neurological assessment parameters. (A) Neurological assessment results of the 4 groups. The degree of neurological impairment was significantly reduced in the BI-III-OCF, CM-II-FMD, and CM-III-OCF groups (p<0.05), but not in the CM-III-FMD group. (B) Neurological assessment results of CM patients with type III-AOJ. Among patients with pure CM exhibiting type III-AOJ, postoperative neurological function was significantly better in those who underwent OCF compared to those who underwent FMD (p<0.05). Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; NDI, Neck Disability Index; BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; FMD, foramen magnum decompression. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 7. Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) scores of patients with CM and CM+II-BI. (A) CCOS scores in the BI-III-OCF group. Of the 4 items (pain, nonpain, functionality, and complications), most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 92.2%, 77.9%, 96.1%, and 96.1%, respectively. Regarding the total score, 77.9% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (B) CCOS scores in the CM-II-FMD group. Of the 4 items, most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 97.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 98.9%. In terms of the total score, 94.5% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (C) CCOS scores in the CM-III-OCF group. Of the 4 items, most patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 100.0%, 93.3%, 100.0%, and 100.0%. In terms of the total score, 93.3% of the patients scored no less than 13 points. (D) CCOS scores in the CM-III-FMD group. Among the 3 items (pain, nonpain, and functionality), only a small percentage of patients scored no less than 3 points, with proportions of 40.0%, 10.3%, and 41.4%. In terms of the total score, only a small percentage of patients scored no less than 13 points, accounting for 6.9%. CM, Chiari malformation; BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression.
Fig. 8. Statistical data on imaging parameters. (A) Imaging findings across the 4 groups. Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-II-FMD, and CM-III-OCF groups showed significant improvements in the number of syringomyelic segments, syringomyelia width, tonsillar herniation distance, and cistern magnum volume (p<0.05). (B) Imaging findings in patients with CM with type III-AOJ. The change in the syringomyelic segment, tonsillar herniation, and syringomyelia width were calculated by subtracting preoperative data from postoperative data, with a positive number indicating improvement. Improvements in these parameters were greater in the CM-III-OCF group than in the CM-III-FMD group. The syringomyelic segment and tonsil herniation worsened in the CM-III-FMF group. The change in cistern magnum volume was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurements from the postoperative measurements, with a positive number indicating an improvement. Patients in the CM-III-OCF group showed significant improvement in this parameter after surgery, whereas those in the CM-III-FMF group exhibited deterioration. Results after surgery refer to the results of the last follow-up. BI, basilar invagination; CM, Chiari malformation; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint. *p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. #p>0.05.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Surgical Strategy Analysis of Chiari Malformation With or Without Type II Basilar Invagination According to the Morphological Types of the Atlanto-Occipital Joint: A Retrospective Study of 212 Patients
Variable
CM-III-OCF (n = 15)
CM-III-FMD (n = 29)
Estimated between-group difference in mean change (95% CI)
Table 1. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative NDI and JOA in Chiari malformation patients with type III atlanto-occipital joint
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
NDI, Neck Disability Index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; CM, Chiari malformation; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; CI, confidence interval.
Table 2. Baseline characteristic of all patients by actual treatment groups
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) unless otherwise indicated.
BI, basilar invagination; OCF, occipitocervical fusion; CM, Chiari malformation; FMD, foramen magnum decompression; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; NDI, Neck Disability Index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
The ASA physical status classification is used to assess a patient’s physical health and comorbidities to predict perioperative risk prior to surgery. Patients with class IV status (systemic disease that is life threatening) or higher were excluded from the study [6].
The NDI ranges from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing less disability. A typical patient with moderate neck pain and disability would have a score between 20 and 40 [8,9].
The JOA scale ranges from 0 to 17, with higher scores representing less dysfunction due to myelopathy. A typical patient with moderate cervical myelopathy has an JOA score between 12 and 14. Many surgical studies show that patients with cervical myelopathy have JOA scores in this range [10].
, Junhua Ye2,3,*
