Spondylolisthesis is a relatively common disease with an incidence approximately 5% of the population requiring fusion surgery
4). Low-grade spondylolisthesis may be managed by conservative treatment in some cases, but in moderate to high grade spondylolisthesis, nonoperative methods are not able to prevent the progressive back and radiating pain, increasing slip and deformity or cauda equina symptoms. Decompression was introduced as the treatment for spondylolisthesis that induces radiating pain by Gill in 1955, and subsequently various surgical techniques have been performed
1). Symptomatic spondylolisthesis usually require surgical intervention, the goals of which include the stabilization of the motion segment, decompression of neural elements, reconstitution of disc space height, and restoration of sagittal plane translational and rotational alignment. Among them, PLIF is a widely performed procedure and it has been associated with the improvement of the fusion rate while restoring disc height and maintaining vertebral alignment for spondylolisthesis. Moreover, recently, mini-open PLIF using percutaneous screw fixation system can provide many potential benefits compared to conventional PLIF
5). For the treatment of symptomatic spondylolisthesis, however, the role of compulsory translational reduction and instrumentation is controversial. Some proponents state that the reduction itself will improve the rate of fusion and improve spinopelvic balance
3). The theoretical advantages of slip reduction include improved spine biomechanics, better nerve root decompression, and chance to obtain fusion because it provides an increased surface area of the fusion bed and the fusion is no longer under the influence of tension and anterior shear forces. Another advantage of slip reduction is the correction of the sagittal deformity to improve posture. Re-aligning the spine and achieving sagittal balance are important in the long run by preventing premature adjacent level disc degeneration
12). On the contrary, a forceful and mandatory instrumented slip reduction can certainly lead to reduction even by 100%, which will increase the risk of permanent complications. The major disadvantage of complete slip reduction is the increased risk of neural injury caused by excessive distraction of nerve roots
11). The various hypothetical cause of neurologic injury include direct pressure on the nerve root during reduction, impingement of the nerve roots on the iliolumbar ligaments, extradural tension on the nerve roots, and disc material extruded into the canal
6,8). Moreover, for the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis, the risk of neural injury caused by forceful reduction and pseudarthrosis is much higher
9,10). To overcome these disadvantages, spontaneous partial reduction techniques have evolved. Pan et al.
12) reported that circumferential release, including scar resection for posterior release complete disc removal and distraction with rupture of annulus conjunct with anterior longitudinal ligament for anterior release in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Significant slip reduction for the group was achieved and the fusion rate approached 100% with no definite neurological complications. They insisted that spondylolisthesis has a certain trend toward spontaneous reduction intraoperatively, including the reduction of translational and rotational deformity, which can provide good outcomes. The technique described here also meets these requirements. Reduction of the slippage was achieved by a combination of two principles. First, circumferential release was applied. Resection of the scar around the pars interarticularis would lead to liberation of the nerve roots, which could help to achieve posterior release. The disc was totally resected with removing the anterior annulus as much as possible even in conjunction with ALL, and the disc space was gradually distracted with sequential disc shavers to fully restore the disc space height, accomplishing anterior release. Second, with the insertion of cages to maintain the height, the following influence of percutaneous pedicle fixation on the spinal alignment by compressive force, additional reduction could be achieved without any application of powerful posterior translational force. As a result, no forceful tension acts on the pedicle screw system, obviously decreasing the anterior shear forces. All the surgical procedures in this study were performed by a single surgeon to eliminate the variable effects of different surgeon on surgical outcome. However, larger-scale, multicenter studies involving more surgeons are necessary to validate our results.