Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Clinical Article

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Suspected Metastatic Spine Tumor

Hyung-Suk Oh, M.D., Byung-Chan Jeon, M.D., Yong-Sook Park, M.D.,Tae-Sang Chun, M.D., Nam-Kyu Kim, M.D..
Korean J Spine 2005;2(3):193-198.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 2,848 Views
  • 28 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
next

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT(PET/CT) scan in suspected metastatic spine tumor.
Methods: Forty six patients were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were decided as follows; prior cancer history, presentation with spinal symptoms such as back pain, sensory change, motor weakness and those who were taken both spinal MRI and PET/CT for the purpose of screening suspected metastatic spine lesions.
Results: Twenty six patients out of 46 patients had one or more lesions at MRI scan. Of them, twenty patients had hyper- metabolic lesions on PET/CT scans concordant with MRI lesions. In fifteen patients, neither MRI nor PET/CT scan revealed any abnormalities. The sensitivity of PET/CT scan was 80.0% and the specificity was 71.4%.
Conclusions: PET/CT combined with MRI seems to provide better sensitivity and specificity for discriminating suspected metastatic spine tumors than either one.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Suspected Metastatic Spine Tumor
Korean J Spine. 2005;2(3):193-198.
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Suspected Metastatic Spine Tumor
Korean J Spine. 2005;2(3):193-198.
Close