1. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011 24:479-484. PMID:
21336176.
2. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008 9:560-565. PMID:
19035748.
3. Fang LM, Zhang YJ, Zhang J, Huang N, Lin HG, Li B, et al. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation by modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a pedicle screw system. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010 90:3339-3342. PMID:
21223749.
4. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:S26-S35. PMID:
12897471.
5. Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 82-A:1458-1476. PMID:
11057475.
6. Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, Tabuchi E, Matsui H, Torii K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25:941-946. PMID:
10767806.
7. Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:S294-S301. PMID:
21160393.
8. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 22:1018-1023. PMID:
9152453.
9. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Sudo H, Abe Y, Minami A. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2012 21:1171-1177. PMID:
22173610.
10. Lau D, Lee JG, Han SJ, Lu DC, Chou D. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). J Clin Neurosci 2011 18:624-627. PMID:
21349719.
11. Lee P, Fessler RG. Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci 2012 19:111-114. PMID:
22133812.
12. Lim TK, Lee SG, Park CW, Kim WK. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and adjacent level angle change on single-level lumbar 4-5 fusion using percutaneous screw fixation and open screw fixation. Korean J Spine 2010 7(4):228-233.
13. Lu C, Lu GH, Ma ZM. [Analysis of complication in the spinal pedicle screw internal fixation]. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2000 25:51-52. PMID:
12212247.
14. McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J, Engelhart L, Knight T, Wang MY. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5,170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 14:771-778. PMID:
21417699.
15. Ntoukas V, Muller A. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010 53:21-24. PMID:
20376740.
16. Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE. Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 2009 27:E9PMID:
19722824.
17. Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:537-543. PMID:
17334287.
18. Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Oh HC, Yoo JH, Kim HB. Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability. Asian Spine J 2011 5:228-236. PMID:
22164317.
19. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Associated Low-Back and Leg Pain Over Two Years. World Neurosurg 2012 78.
20. Payer M. "Minimally invasive" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011 153:1455-1459. PMID:
21533888.
21. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M, et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18:568-574. PMID:
8484147.
22. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005 18(Suppl):S1-S6. PMID:
15699793.
23. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:1615-1620. PMID:
20479702.
24. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2011 20:623-628. PMID:
20927557.