Glomangiopericytoma of the Spinal Cord
Article information
Abstract
Glomangiopericytoma, also referred to as a hemangiopericytoma-like tumor or sinonasal type hemangiopericytoma, is a rare tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus that has never been reported in the spinal cord. Here, we report a case of a 47-year-old man who developed glomangiopericytoma in the thoracic spine. This lesion showed a heterogeneous high signal intensity compared to the spinal cord on a T2-weighted image and an easily enhanced isointense signal on a T1-weighted image.
INTRODUCTION
Glomangiopericytoma is a rare sinonasal tumor with a perivascular myoid phenotype and a prominent perivascular growth pattern15). It develops in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus and has a low malignant potential7). Glomangiopericytomas are different from conventional hemangiopericytomas with respect to their location and histopathologic features and account for less than 0.5% of all sinonasal tumors16). While their etiology is unclear, a history of trauma, hypertension, pregnancy, or corticosteroid use can be a cause1). To date, there have been no reported cases of glomangiopericytoma in the spine. Here, we present what we believe to be the first reported case of spinal glomangiopericytoma, and we describe its radiological characteristics. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, and the need for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study.
CASE REPORT
A 47-year-old man was admitted for gait disturbance, radiating pain, and decreased sensation in the left calf that had developed about 15 days ago. Muscle weakness in the lower leg was not observed in the physical examination. Numbness and a tingling sensation in the left calf and foot were confirmed, and the sacral segment showed a sparing pattern. The patient had experienced frequent urination and a residual urine sensation for several months without signs of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Electrodiagnosis revealed no definite evidence of neuropathy or radiculopathy in the lower extremities, but a partial defect in neural conductivity through the posterior column-medial lemniscus system from the left lower limb was suspected. Tests for systemic tumor markers revealed that alpha-fetoprotein (3.95 ng/mL), carcinoembryonic antigen(2.51 ng/mL), and prostate-specific antigen (0.471 ng/mL) were all within the normal range. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed that the proportion of lymphocytes had increased to 100%(normal range, 28%–96%) and the protein level had increased to 491 mg/dL (normal range, 15–45 mg/dL).
There were no particular findings on the plain radiograph of the thoracic and lumbar spine besides spondylosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine revealed a lobulated mass measuring approximately 1.6 cm×1.0 cm×1.5 cm in the left posterolateral aspect of the intramedullary area at the T12 level, and swelling and edema were found from T4 to L1 in the spinal cord. Destruction of the adjacent bone was not observed. Compared with the spinal cord, heterogeneous high-signal intensity was observed on a T2-weighted image (T2WI), an isointense signal was apparent on a T1-weighted image (T1WI), and homogeneous enhancement was detected on a contrast-enhanced T1WI. Compared with the spinal cord, an isointense lesion with definite boundaries was observed on b400 and b800 diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and in an apparent diffusion coefficient map. On non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images, compared with the spinal cord, the mass was seen as an isodense soft tissue lesion with indefinite boundaries, and homogeneous enhancement was detected on contrast-enhanced CT. Minimal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake (maxSUV: 2.8) by the mass lesion was observed on positron emission tomography (PET)-CT (Fig. 1).
Radiologically, we did not distinguish between intradural extramedullary tumor or intramedullary tumor and a midline durotomy was performed following total laminectomy of T12 and left-sided partial laminectomy of L1. No tumor was detected in the intradural extramedullary space. After myelotomy, a brownish soft mass was observed that had adhered to the rootlets in the intramedullary space. Intralesional biopsy and debulking surgery were performed owing to a very irregular margin. Complete excision was impossible due to a very ill-defined margin. Furthermore, malignancy could not be ruled out. There were no perioperative and postoperative complications. The mass was a highly vascularized lesion. Bleeding control during surgery was very difficult.
Upon histological examination, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed probable glomangiopericytoma cells that were oval to spindle-shaped and located in a thin-walled staghorn vessel. Immunohistochemically, positive staining for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and bcl2, but negative staining for CD31, CD34, CD99, S100, factor VIII, and epithelial membrane antigen were present in tumor cells (Fig. 2). These features confirmed the diagnosis of glomangiopericytoma.
DISCUSSION
Glomangiopericytoma was first reported in 1942 as hemangiopericytoma by Stout and Murray12). In 1976, Compagno and Hyams3) renamed it hemangiopericytoma-like intranasal tumor in order to reflect its low metastasis and mortality rates. In 2005, the World Health Organization named it glomangiopericytoma, sinonasal-type hemangiopericytoma, or hemangiopericytoma-like tumor due to its different clinical and histological characteristics compared with hemangiopericytoma16). Glomangiopericytoma mainly develops in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and accounts for less than 0.5% of all sinonasal tumors16). It is slightly more common in women than men and can occur in patients of any age, but is most common in the seventh decade of life2,7). However, to the best of our knowledge, a case of glomangiopericytoma in the spine has never previously been reported. There was no history of trauma, hypertension, or corticosteroid use in our patients and etiology was unclear. So, we think that glomangiopericytoma is considered as a hybrid between hemangiopericytoma and glomus tumor10), it may be related to the development of hemangiopericytoma and glomus tumor, although it is rare in spine.
Glomangiopericytoma in the nasal cavity is characterized histologically by the presence of round, glomus-like cells located near the blood vessels. In H&E staining, varying numbers of vascular channels and perivascular concentric cellular growths are seen. Nuclear pleomorphism is not observed, and there are few or no mitotic bodies13). Immunohistochemically, these tumors are positive for vimentin, SMA, muscle specific actin, and factor XIIIa and negative for desmin, CD31, CD34, CD99, CD117, S100 protein, and bcl-2, although they have been weakly positive for CD34 and S100 protein in some cases5,13,15,17,18). It shows soft tissue density and heterogeneous enhancement on CT6,9,13,14). On MRI, an isointense signal (relative to normal nasal mucosa) is observed on T1WI, and an isointense-to-high signal is seen on T2WI. On contrast-enhanced MRI, unlike on CT, it shows homogeneous enhancement9,13). In general, these tumors unilaterally involve the nasal cavity, and destruction of the neighboring bone is not observed6,9,13,14). In PET-CT, low-grade FDG hyper-metabolism is seen4).
In the case described here, a lobulated mass was observed in the left posterolateral aspect of the intramedullary area at the T12 level of the thoracic spine, and swelling and edema were detected from T4 to L1 in the spinal cord. Similar to glomangiopericytoma in the nasal cavity, the lesion was seen as an isodense soft tissue lesion with indefinite boundaries on nonenhanced CT compared with the spinal cord, while homogeneous enhancement was observed on contrast-enhanced CT. Minimal FDG uptake was detected on PET-CT. Compared with the spinal cord on MRI, heterogeneous high-signal intensity on T2WI and an isointense signal on T1WI were observed. Like contrast-enhanced CT, homogeneous enhancement was seen on contrast-enhanced T1WI. DWI revealed an isointense signal compared with CSF, and the lesion had definite boundaries in b400 and b800. During imaging studies, it is necessary to distinguish glomangiopericytoma from astrocytoma and hemangiopericytoma that can develop in the intradural area. Histologically, fibrillary astrocytoma is seen parenchymal infiltration, nuclear atypia and increased cellularity. Pilocytic astrocytoma lacks mitotic figures and shows harbor Rosenthal fibers and thickened vascular walls11). Hemangiopericytoma is seen loss of architecture, high cellularity with frequent mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism and staghorn’ vascular channels. Immunohistochemically, these tumor can be positively for HLA-DR, CD34, Leu-7, vimentin, S-100 protein, CD99, bcl-2, and factor XIIIa8).
CONCLUSION
Glomangiopericytoma is a rare tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus, and this is the first reported case of glomangiopericytoma in the spinal cord. Compared to glomangiopericytoma in the nasal cavity, this case of spinal glomangiopericytoma showed very similar CT, MRI, and PET-CT findings, and no destruction of the neighboring bone was observed.
Notes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.