1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Singh A, Massicotte EM, et al. Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38(22 Suppl 1):S111-22.
4. Peng B, Yang L, Yang C, et al. The effectiveness of anterior cervical decompression and fusion for the relief of dizziness in patients with cervical spondylosis: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018 100-B:81-7.
5. Furlan JC, Catharine Craven B. Psychometric analysis and critical appraisal of the original, revised, and modified versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in the assessment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 2016 40:E6.
6. Keller A, von Ammon K, Klaiber R, et al. Spondylogenic cervical myelopathy: conservative and surgical therapy. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1993 123:1682-91.
7. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, et al. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1991 4:286-95.
8. Singh A, Crockard HA. Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. J Outcome Meas 2001-2002 5:798-818.
9. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, et al. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1981 6:354-64.
10. Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kailaya-Vasan A, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 14:348-55.
11. Fukui K, Kataoka O, Sho T, et al. Pathomechanism, pathogenesis, and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 15:1148-52.
13. Kopjar B, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, et al. Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015 40:E23-8.
14. Revanappa KK, Moorthy RK, Jeyaseelan V, et al. Modification of Nurick scale and Japanese Orthopedic Association score for Indian population with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol India 2015 63:24-9.
20. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Moossy JJ, et al. Preference-based quality of life measurement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004 29:1271-80.
22. Gupte G, Peters CM, Buchowski JM, et al. Reliability of the Neck Disability Index and Japanese Orthopedic Association questionnaires in adult cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy patients when administered by telephone or via online format. Spine J 2019 19:1154-61.
23. King JT Jr, Roberts MS. Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 2002 97(2 Suppl):180-5.
24. Guilfoyle MR, Seeley H, Laing RJ. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures. Br J Neurosurg 2009 23:401-5.
25. Bohm PE, Fehlings MG, Kopjar B, et al. Psychometric properties of the 30-m walking test in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from two prospective multicenter cohort studies. Spine J 2017 17:211-7.
26. Matz PG, Anderson PA, Holly LT, et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 11:104-11.
29. Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neuroimaging 2007 17:315-22.
30. Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 2005 64 Suppl 1(S1):30-5.
32. Cheng SC, Yen CH, Kwok TK, et al. Anterior spinal fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective review. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2009 17:265-8.
35. Fehlings MG, Arvin B. Surgical management of cervical degenerative disease: the evidence related to indications, impact, and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 11:97-100.
36. Gok B, McLoughlin GS, Sciubba DM, et al. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion. Neurol Res 2009 31:1097-101.
37. Holly LT, Moftakhar P, Khoo LT, et al. Surgical outcomes of elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 2008 69:233-40.
38. Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery 2003 52:1081-7.
39. Igarashi K, Shibuya S, Sano H, et al. Functional assessment of proximal arm muscles by target-reaching movements in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine J 2011 11:270-80.
41. Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38:392-400.
42. Kim HJ, Moon SH, Kim HS, et al. Diabetes and smoking as prognostic factors after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90:1468-72.
43. Kim B, Yoon DH, Shin HC, et al. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2015 15:875-84.
47. Naruse T, Yanase M, Takahashi H, et al. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:2634-41.
54. Suzuki A, Misawa H, Simogata M, et al. Recovery process following cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical compression myelopathy: prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:2874-9.
55. Tetreault LA, Nouri A, Singh A, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: a survey of members from AOSpine International. World Neurosurg 2014 81:623-33.
56. Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010 16:176-87.
57. Wang Y, Wang W, Zhu M, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with prior cerebral infarction: Clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and prognostic value of “prior cerebral infarction”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018 175:34-9.
58. Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Sato H, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences. Neurosurgery 2003 52:122-6.
59. Sakaura H, Miwa T, Kuroda Y, et al. Surgical outcomes after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with renal dysfunction and/or aortic arch calcification. J Neurosurg Spine 2016 25:444-7.
60. Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, et al. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:E396-9.
61. Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, et al. Significance of increased signal intensity on MRI in prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci 2011 18:1080-3.
62. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ, et al. Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38(22 Suppl 1):S161-70.
63. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, et al. Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38(22 Suppl 1):S149-60.
64. Buell TJ, Buchholz AL, Quinn JC, et al. Importance of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018 29:69-82.
66. Karpova A, Arun R, Kalsi-Ryan S, et al. Do quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters correlate with the clinical presentation and functional outcomes after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014 39:1488-97.
67. Arvin B, Kalsi-Ryan S, Mercier D, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is associated with baseline neurological status and can predict postoperative recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38:1170-6.
69. Matsuyama Y, Kawakami N, Yanase M, et al. Cervical myelopathy due to OPLL: clinical evaluation by MRI and intraoperative spinal sonography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004 17:401-4.
70. Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, et al. Preoperative patient selection with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and electroencephalography: does the test predict outcome after cervical surgery? J Neurosurg Spine 2009 11:119-29.
71. You JY, Lee JW, Lee E, et al. MR classification system based on axial images for cervical compressive myelopathy. Radiology 2015 276:553-61.
72. Zhang L, Zeitoun D, Rangel A, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy with flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging: about a prospective study of fifty patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36:E1134-E1139.
73. Martin AR, Tadokoro N, Tetreault L, et al. Imaging evaluation of degenerative cervical myelopathy: current state of the art and future directions. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018 29:33-45.
75. Ozawa H, Aizawa T, Tateda S, et al. Spinal cord swelling after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: relationship with intramedullary Gd-DTPA enhancement on MRI. Clin Spine Surg 2018 31:E363-E367.
76. Eicker SO, Langen KJ, Galldiks N, et al. Clinical value of 2-deoxy-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 2013 35:E2.
77. Shamji MF, Mohanty C, Massicotte EM, et al. The association of cervical spine alignment with neurologic recovery in a prospective cohort of patients with surgical myelopathy: analysis of a series of 124 cases. World Neurosurg 2016 86:112-9.
79. Hirai T, Yoshii T, Sakai K, et al. Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Sci 2018 23:32-8.