1. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, et al. Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019 44:369-76.
3. Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2017 80:701-15.
4. Heemskerk JL, Oluwadara Akinduro O, Clifton W, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Spine J 2021 21:2049-65.
6. Chan AK, Sharma V, Robinson LC, et al. Summary of guidelines for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2019 30:353-64.
7. Vadala G, Accoto D, Russo F, et al. A new surgical positioning system for robotic assisted minimally invasive spine surgery and transpedicular approach to the disc. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2017 31(4 suppl 1):159-65.
10. Passias PG, Brown AE, Alas H, et al. A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion. Spine J 2021 21:193-201.
11. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 15:11-4.
12. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cheh G, et al. Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30:2084-8.
13. Houten JK, Nasser R, Baxi N. Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the o-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system. Neurosurgery 2012 70:990-5.
14. Chen K, Chen H, Zhang K, et al. O-arm navigation combined with microscope-assisted MIS-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Clin Spine Surg 2019 32:E235-40.
15. Sun J, Wu D, Wang Q, et al. Pedicle screw insertion: is O-Arm– based navigation superior to the conventional freehand technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2020 144:e87-99.
16. Perfetti DC, Kisinde S, Rogers-LaVanne MP, et al. Robotic spine surgery: past, present, and future. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022 47:909-21.
17. Nelson EM, Monazzam SM, Kim KD, et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopy, portable X-ray, and CT: patient and operating room personnel radiation exposure in spinal surgery. Spine J 2014 14:2985-91.
18. Pennington Z, Cottrill E, Westbroek EM, et al. Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature. Spine J 2019 19:1397-411.
19. Bovonratwet P, Nelson SJ, Ondeck NT, et al. Comparison of 30-day complications between navigated and conventional single-level instrumented posterior lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018 43:447-53.
20. Wang Y, Hu Y, Liu H, et al. Navigation makes transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion less invasive. Orthopedics 2016 39:e857-62.
22. Dea N, Fisher CG, Batke J, et al. Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis. Spine J 2016 16:23-31.