Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 87 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-10.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Correlation Between the Severity of Multifidus Fatty Degeneration and the Size of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament at Each Spinal Level
Neurospine Search

CLOSE


Park, Cho, Kim, Shin, Kim, Lim, Chung, and Park: Correlation Between the Severity of Multifidus Fatty Degeneration and the Size of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament at Each Spinal Level

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) size and multifidus fatty degeneration (MFD), hypothesizing that larger OPLL sizes are associated with worse MFD.

Methods

One hundred four patients with cervical OPLL who underwent surgery were screened. OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios, the severity of MFD using the Goutallier classification, and range of motion (ROM) of cervical flexion-extension (ΔCobb) were measured. Correlation analyses between OPLL size, MFD severity, and ΔCobb were conducted. MFD severity was compared for each OPLL type using one-way analysis of variance.

Results

The final clinical data from 100 patients were analyzed. The average Goutallier grade of C2–7 significantly correlated with the average OPLL diameter and area occupying ratios, and OPLL involved vertebral level (r = 0.58, p < 0.01; r = 0.40, p < 0.01; r = 0.47, p < 0.01, respectively). The OPLL size at each cervical level significantly correlated with MFD of the same or 1–3 adjacent levels. ΔCobb angle was negatively correlated with the average Goutallier grade (r = -0.31, p < 0.01) and average OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios (r = -0.31, p < 0.01; r = -0.35, p < 0.01, respectively). Patients with continuous OPLL exhibited worse MFD than those with segmental OPLL (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

OPLL size is clinically correlated with MFD and cervical ROM. OPLL at one spinal level affects MFD at the same and 1–3 adjacent spinal levels. The worsening severity of MFD is associated with the longitudinal continuity of OPLL.

INTRODUCTION

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a pathological process of ectopic ossification at the posterior longitudinal ligament of spine [1]. Axially enlarged ossification can compress the spinal cord or mechanically irritate the spinal roots, thereby causing myeloradiculopathy. Severe neurological symptoms are sometimes accompanied by paralysis or gait disturbances that may require surgical treatment. Therefore, identifying prognostic factors in patients with OPLL can aid in determining the optimal clinical strategy for patients. OPLL has been suggested to have a multifactorial aetiology owing to its poorly identified pathophysiology. Its genetic background has been identified, as presenting susceptible genes as follows: BMP2, BMP4, BMP 9, COL6A1, COL11A2, ESR1, IL-1β, IL-15RA, RUNX2, RXRB, TLR5, TGFB1, TFGB3, VDR, and HLA haplotype, etc [2-6]. However, gene therapy for OPLL has not yet been implemented. Thus, identifying modifiable factors that influence the manifestation or progression of OPLL is more important.
Several hormones, including growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor, insulin, leptin, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, transforming growth factor-β, and bone morphogenetic protein, are correlated with the ossification of the spinal ligaments [7]. Metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, and obesity, are also related to the prevalence of spinal hyperostosis [8].
However, little clinical evidence on the relationship between paraspinal muscle quality and OPLL severity currently exists. Among the paraspinal muscles, the important role of the multifidus in stabilising the spine and modulating spinal motion has been elucidated [9]. Thus, multifidus dysfunction causes several clinical symptoms and signs contributing to spinal degeneration [10]. The multifidus fatty degeneration (MFD) has been studied as a risk factor for spinal degeneration, including spinal stenosis and intervertebral disc degeneration [11]. However, researches on the correlation between OPLL and MFD is scarce, and as a consequence, there has been no study that includes MFD as an independent variable in analyzing the factors affecting the prognosis after OPLL surgery [12,13].
Thereby, the present study is designed to investigate the correlation between OPLL size and the severity of MFD, under the hypothesis that larger OPLL would be correlated with worse MFD, and is first to analyse the correlation by each cervical spinal level. As MFD was expected to be correlated with a decreased cervical range of motion (ROM); therefore, additional analyses of the dynamic radiographs were conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study Design and Population

In the present cross-sectional study, 104 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent surgery between February 2015 and November 2017 at a tertiary hospital were screened. Prior to the operation, all patients underwent plain cervical spinal radiography of the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, as well as dynamography of the full flexion and extension positions and computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine in the supine position. The CT images were acquired at 2-mm intervals, and reformatted to make sure that they were perpendicular to each vertebral axis also at 2-mm intervals. Patients’ data that met the following criteria were excluded: (1) a history of cervical spinal surgery, (2) combined thoracic OPLL, (3) inflammatory spondylitis (ankylosing spondylitis), and (4) insufficient medical records. The collected demographic data were age, sex, and height. The study protocol was approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board (3-2021-0206) and complied with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of the World Medical Association. Informed consent was waived, because it was retrospective study and does not expose patient-identifiable information.

2. Radiologic Measurements

Two physiatrists participated in the radiologic measurements by reviewing the CT images and dynamograms. If the measured values differed from one another, a consensus was reached through discussion between these researchers. The OPLL sizes and Cobb angles were measured using the Picture Archiving and Communication System (Centricity PACS Radiology RA1000 Workstation, GE Healthcare, Barrington, IL, USA), which enables the display, manipulation, and editing of radiologic images.

1) OPLL size

Based on the axial section of preoperative CT, the AP diameter and area of the spinal canal and OPLL were measured at the maximal OPLL occupying axial image of each C2–7 level. The OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios were calculated as follows:
OPLL occupying diameter ratio= OPLL AP diameter/spinal canal AP diameter.
OPLL occupying area ratio = OPLL occupying area/spinal canal area.

2) Cervical ROM

To investigate the preoperative ROM in the sagittal plane of the cervical spine, Cobb angles were measured between C2–7 using preoperative dynamography performed with the patient in the standing position with full anterior flexion and posterior extension of the neck. The ΔCobb was calculated as the difference between Cobb angles of C2–7 when the cervical spine was fully flexed and extended.

3) K-line and OPLL involevement

As kyphosis line (K-line) has been utilized in making surgical decisions in OPLL patients, patients in this study were categorized into K-line (+) group and K-line (-) group [14]. The plane lateral view of the cervical spine in the neutral position was used in measurement. The K-line was drawn connecting the midpoints of the spinal canal at C2 and C7. Patients with OPLL that exceeded the K-line were labeled as K-line (-), whereas those who did not exceeded the K-line were labeled as K-line (+).

4) Classification of MFD

The MFD at each C2–7 level was graded using the Goutallier classification on axial CT. The Goutallier classification is as follows: grade 0, normal muscle; grade 1, muscle contains fatty streaks; grade 2, fatty infiltration but more muscle than fat remains; grade 3, equal amounts of fat and muscle; grade 4, amount of fatty infiltration is greater than that of muscle. Among the multiple axial CT images of each spinal level, the one with the most severe MFD was selected and graded. Because the multifidus muscle supports the spine bilaterally, the higher Goutallier grade between those of the right and left multifidus was selected and used in the analysis. The average Goutallier grade of MFD at C2–7 and the grade of each spinal level were used in the analyses.

5) OPLL type

OPLL is divided into the following types according to the continuity of the ossified lesions: continuous, segmental, mixed, and localized [15].

3. Statistical Analysis

1) Data analysis

The baseline demographic characteristics were analysed using a t-test. Spearman correlation analyses were conducted between OPLL size (either the OPLL AP diameter or area occupying ratios), MFD, and cervical ROM, as these variables did not follow a normal distribution. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the severity of MFD for each OPLL type. The independent t-test was used to find the difference in OPLL size and the severity MFD between K-line (+) group and K-line (-) group. IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform all the analyses. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2) Sample size calculation

For correlation analyses, at least 76 samples were needed to adjust for an effect size of 0.55, an alpha value of 0.05, and 1-β (power) of 0.95, and more than 25 samples were needed for each OPLL type to enable 1-way ANOVA for 4 different OPLL types, adjusting for an effect size of 0.75, an alpha value of 0.2, and 1-β (power) of 0.8. In the present study, few patients had localized OPLL (only 2), but the number of patients with other types exceeded 25, and the total number of patients was 100.

RESULTS

The clinical data of 100 patients in total were used in the analyses after 4 patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery were excluded.

1. Baseline Characteristics

The patients’ clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The average OPLL diameter and area occupying ratios of 6 cervical levels (C2–7) were 0.31 and 0.19, respectively. OPLL was frequent in the order of mixed, continuous, segmental, and localized types. The average Goutallier grade of the multifidus at the C2–7 level was 1.97. The mean AP ROM was 27.43°. C3 exhibited the most degeneration, whereas C2 exhibited the least (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1).

2. OPLL Size and MFD

The OPLL size was largest at the C4 level, followed by C5, C3, C6, C7, and C2 (Table 2, Fig. 1), and this result is correspondent to that of a previous study [16]. The average Goutallier grades from C2–7 were significantly correlated with the average OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios of C2–7 (r=0.58, p<0.01, Fig. 2A; r = 0.40, p < 0.01, Fig. 2B, respectively). The OPLL size at each level of the cervical spine was significantly correlated with the MFD of the same level (Table 2). It also exhibited a significant correlation with the MFD of the 1–3 adjacent cervical spinal levels (Table 2, Fig. 3). In addition, OPLL involved vertebral level was positively correlated with the average Goutallier grades from C2–7 (r=0.47, p<0.01) by Pearson correlation analysis.

3. OPLL Size and Cervical ROM

The average OPLL occupying diameter ratio of C2–7 was negatively correlated with ΔCobb (r=-0.31, p = 0.02) (Fig. 2C) as was the average OPLL occupying area ratio of C2–7 (r=-0.35, p<0.01) (Fig. 2D).

4. Cervical ROM and MFD

ΔCobb angle was negatively correlated with the average Goutallier grade of C2–7 (r=-0.31, p<0.01) (Fig. 2E).

5. OPLL Size and MFD Severity According to OPLL’s K-Line Invasion

The K-line (-) group had higher OPLL diameter occupying ratio (p = 0.002) and OPLL area occupying ratio (p = 0.001), as well as a more OPLL involved vertebral level (p = 0.021) than K-line (+) group. The MFD in K-line (-) group was more than in the K-line (+) group (p = 0.005) (Supplementary Table 1).

6. MFD by OPLL Type

Prior analysis was conducted to examine the variation in age among subgroups of OPLL types, with the objective of validating the degree of severity of MFD specific to each OPLL type, while eliminating for the potential confounding influence of age on MFD measurements. Welch’s robust 1-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis were employed since the subgroups follow normality by Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk analysis, with the exception of the localized type, which was observed in only 2 patients, and there was no intergroup difference regarding age among the subgroups (Supplementary Table 2). The average Goutallier grades of C2–7 in the following OPLL types were as follows: continuous (average [standard deviation], 2.12 [0.4]), mixed (1.98 [0.45]), segmental (1.73 [0.32]), and localized (1.55 [0.35]). The continuous (p<0.001) and mixed types (p = 0.002) exhibited more severe fatty degeneration than the segmental type (Fig. 4).

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly investigate the relationship between the severity of OPLL and MFD at each cervical spinal level. Clinical interest in the multifidus muscle in chronic spinal disease has been increasing, as it is an important stabiliser and mover of the spine [17]. The multifidus, a pinnate muscle, attaches to the spinous process of the spine, stabilises the adjacent posterior side of the spine, and holds 2–3 spinal levels to allow the creation of higher torque, even with a small contractile force [18].
The pathogenesis of OPLL is thought to be multifactorial, and obtaining a clear explanation remains difficult. A significant correlation between the severity of MFD and OPLL size will play a significant role in elucidating the pathogenesis of OPLL. Some possible mechanisms are as follow: denervation, chronic inflammation, mechanotransduction, and disuse-induced muscular degeneration.

1. Denervation

Denervation of the peripheral nerve causes fatty degeneration of the target muscle. It has been studied at the molecular signalling level, revealing that denervation-activated fibro-adipogenic progenitors activate signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and promote muscle atrophy and fibrosis [19]. A study group demonstrated that inhibition of IL-6, Janus kinase, and STAT3 pathway suppresses the protein degradation pathway, thereby attenuating skeletal muscle atrophy [20]. If OPLL invaded the neural foramen of the vertebra, the posterior rami of the spinal nerve, which innervates the multifidus muscle, would be irritated, causing radiculopathy, and may cause MFD pathohistologically.

2. Chronic Inflammation

Considering that the action of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), are involved in the pathophysiology of ossifying spinal ligaments, inflammatory response are suggested to related to OPLL [21-23]. A recent study revealed that IL-6 is more highly presented in continuous type OPLL than in segmental type OPLL [24]. This result implies that inflammation may also be the reason why MFD is more severe in continuous compared to the segmental type in this present study. In addition, Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation was studied to positively correlate with the content of TGF-β1 and PDGF-BB in spinal ligament cells, which would contributes to osteoblastic differentiation [21]. Considering NF-κB is associated with skeletal muscle atrophy or degeneration along with TNF-α or IL-6, an overall inflammatory condition in ligament and adjacent skeletal muscles are suspected in patients with OPLL presenting MFD [25]. A study group elucidated that TNF expression in the multifidus muscle was greater in high levels of fat-infiltrated multifidus rather than low levels of fat infiltration [26]. Moreover, as well as the aforementioned tissue-derived cytokines, the serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate was higher in OPLL patients than in non-OPLL controls, and patients with OPLL in progress exhibited elevated highly-sensitive C-reactive protein levels than those with OPLL in nonprogress [27]. Therefore, it can be reasonably suspected that this inflammatory condition may also related to the degeneration of the spinal muscles.

3. Mechanotransduction

Mechanical stress, such as tensile strain, induces the osteogenic differentiation of posterior longitudinal ligament fibroblasts through the upregulation of several molecules, such as osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, or type I collagen [28-31]. Bone morphogenetic protein-2, which is the most mentioned gene contributing to OPLL, is activated via mechanotransduction and plays a role in ossification [3,4,32,33]. When the stabiliser muscles are weakened, nonphysiological and unnecessary mobility develops in the spine, and microfriction occurs more frequently in the spinal ligaments or facet joints. This pathological process causes abnormal ossification of ligaments in accordance with the forementioned mechanotransduction-related processes [34]. Noncoding ribonucleic acids (RNA), which do not translate into protein, have been increasingly recognized for their involvement in various biological processes, including bone metabolism and muscle atrophy [35-38]. For instance, long noncoding RNA H19, closely associate with BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells in OPLL, is also related to muscle atrophy process [37,38]. Moreover, mechanosensitive micro RNAs, such as miR-103, which has been revealed to increase osteoblastic activity, is also associated with muscle atropy [38,39]. The shared genetic processes between bone metabolism and muscle atrophy at both the protein and RNA levels provide a potential genetic background for understanding the correlation between OPLL size and MFD severity.

4. Disuse-Induced Muscular Degeneration

Disuse-induced atrophy or dysfunction of these muscles would promote the degeneration of long bones and their related joints [40,41]. Numerous studies have demonstrated the relationship between deconditioning of the paralumbar axial muscles and low back pain [42-44]. Most of the early studies used the volume, cross-sectional area, or power as the parameters to estimate the condition of the axial muscles. Muscle density and fatty streak proportion within a muscle were considered to reflect the skeletal muscle condition. A study revealed that reduced multifidus density was associated with more severe osteoarthritis of the facet joint [45]. Another study group recently analysed fatty infiltration of the paracervical muscle at 2 spinal levels, C4/5 and C5/6, with the maximum occupancy ratio of OPLL, yielding a significant correlation between OPLL size and MFD at the C5/6 level [46]. However, this study is limited in that not all spinal levels were examined. Similarly, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, more fatty degeneration is observed in the multifidus muscles of the lumbar spine than in those without this condition [47]. Considering that fatty infiltration occurs in the late stage of muscular degeneration, long-term disuse or deconditioning can be expected to play a role in MFD [48]. In addition, because the invasion of OPLL concerning the K-line is classifed in the axial plane, the significant decrease in cervical ROM (ΔCobb angle) observed in the K-line (-) group (Supplementary Table 1) indicates that not only longitudinal involvement of OPLL but also axial involvement may impact the restriction of ROM, potentially leading to disuse-related MFD. Although the effect of physical exercise on MFD in patients with OPLL could not be directly analysed in this study, a case-control study revealed that regular and moderate amounts of physical exercise are associated with a decreased risk of OPLL. However, no specific guidelines on exercise in patients with OPLL are available, even in the clinical practice guidelines on the management of ossification of the spinal ligament [47].
This study has several limitations. As this study did not compare the severity of MFD between OPLL group and non-OPLL controls, it was difficult to investigate the extent of which OPLL itself affects the severity of MFD. However, even if a comparison is conducted between the OPLL group and non-OPLL group, it will be challenging to draw straightforward conclusions because it is difficult to control each patient’s lifestyle or genetic background. In addition, it may be limited in scope because only patients who underwent surgery were included, may resulting in a bias in the correlation coefficient; nonetheless, it was designed to focus on OPLL severe enough to necessitate mechanical decompression. More quantitative image processing techniques can be utilized to quantify the severity of MFD based on magnetic resonance imaging, however this method is difficult to employ in a busy clinical setting, hence simple classification was used.

CONCLUSION

The OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios are clinically correlated with the severity of MFD and cervical ROM. The OPLL at one spinal level affects the MFD at the same and 1–3 adjacent spinal levels. The worsening severity of MFD is associated with the longitudinal continuity of OPLL. Clinicians need to pay attention to these relationships, since MFD does not immediately resolve after decompression surgery. This study will be useful not only in identifying the factors significantly associated with postoperative pain or function, but also in establishing a personalized postoperative exercise program for muscular reeducation in consideration of the severity of patients’ MFD.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Tables 1-2 can be found via https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346506.253.
Supplementary Table 1.
OPLL size and MFD according to OPLL’s K-line invasion
ns-2346506-253-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf
Supplementary Table 2.
Average age by OPLL type
ns-2346506-253-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf

NOTES

Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding/Support

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: JP, YGP; Data acquisition: SS, CHL, SYC, YEC; Data curation: JP; Methodology: JP, KHK, SK; Project administration: JP, YEC; Visualization: JP; Writing – Original Draft: JP; Writing – Review & Editing: JP, SS, YGP.

Fig. 1.
OPLL size and MFD of each spinal level from C2–7. The Goutallier classification was as follows: grade 0, normal muscle; grade 1, muscle contains fatty streaks; grade 2, fatty infiltration but more muscle than fat remains; grade 3, equal amounts of fat and muscle; grade 4, amount of fatty infiltration is greater than that of muscle. OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; MFD, multifidus fatty degeneration.
ns-2346506-253f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Correlation of average OPLL size, cervical range of motion, and average multifidus fatty degeneration of C2–7. The multifidus fatty degeneration (average Goutallier grade of C2–7) was significantly correlated with the average OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios of C2–7 (A: r = 0.58, p < 0.01; B: r = 0.40, p < 0.01, respectively). The anteroposterior cervical range of motion (ΔCobb) was significantly correlated with the average OPLL occupying diameter and area ratios of C2–7 (C: r= -0.31, p = 0.02; D: r = -0.35, p < 0.01, respectively). Multifidus fatty degeneration was significantly correlated with cervical range of motion (E; r = -0.31, p < 0.01). OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; ΔCobb, C2–7 range of motion between full flexion-extension between.
ns-2346506-253f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Correlation of OPLL size and multifidus fatty degeneration of each cervical level of C2–7. The OPLL occupying diameter ratio (A) and area ratio (B) at each level of the cervical spine was significantly correlated with the multifidus fatty degeneration of the same level and 1–3 adjacent cervical spinal levels. OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.001.
ns-2346506-253f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
The severity of multifidus fatty degeneration for each OPLL type. The Goutallier classification was as follows: grade 0, normal muscle; grade 1, muscle contains fatty streaks; grade 2, fatty infiltration but more muscle than fat remains; grade 3, equal amounts of fat and muscle; grade 4, amount of fatty infiltration is greater than that of muscle. OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. *p < 0.05.
ns-2346506-253f4.jpg
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament patients
Variable Value
Demographic characteristic
 Age (yr), mean (range) 55.98 (32–83)
 Sex
  Male 69 (69.0)
  Female 31 (31.0)
 Height (cm), mean ± SD 166.47 ± 9.50
OPLL
 Topography of OPLL at the C2–7, mean ± SE
  OPLL diameter occupying ratio 0.31 ± 0.01
  OPLL area occupying ratio 0.19 ± 0.02
   OPLL AP diameter (mm) 4.08 ± 0.17
   Spinal canal diameter (mm) 13.42 ± 0.11
   OPLL area (mm2) 40.91 ± 2.31
   Spinal canal area (mm2) 245.7 ± 2.67
  OPLL involved vertebral leve 4.81 ± 1.18
 Type of OPLL, n (%)
  Continuous type 33/100 (33.0)
  Segmental type 28/100 (28.0)
  Mixed type 37/100 (37.0)
  Localized type 2/100 (2.0)
Cervical range of motion (˚), mean ± SE
 C2–7 Cobb angle of full flexion -9.27 ± 1.08
 C2–7 Cobb angle of full extension 18.16 ± 0.82
 ΔCobb 27.43 ± 1.16
Multifidus fatty degeneration
 Goutallier grade at the C2–7, mean ± SE 1.97 ± 0.38
 Goutallier grade, n (%) n = 600 spinal levels
  Grade 0 19/600 (3.2)
  Grade 1 125/600 (20.8)
  Grade 2 345/600 (57.5)
  Grade 3 76/600 (12.7)
  Grade 4 35/600 (5.8)
 Most degenerated level C3
 Least degenerated level C2

SD, standard deviation; OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; AP, anteroposterior; SE, standard error; ΔCobb, C2–7 range of motion between full flexion-extension between.

Goutallier classification system: grade 0, normal muscle; grade 1, some fatty streaks; grade 2, less than 50% fatty muscle atrophy; grade 3, 50% fatty muscle atrophy; grade 4, greater than 50% fatty muscle atrophy.

Table 2.
Characteristics of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and multifidus fatty degeneration by cervical levels
Variable Cervical level
C2–7 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
OPLL size
OPLL diameter occupying ratio 0.31 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.02 0.23 ± 0.02
OPLL AP diameter (mm) 4.08 ± 0.17 2.43 ± 0.29 4.33 ± 0.26 5.03 ± 0.21 4.98 ± 0.20 4.44 ± 0.23 3.25 ± 0.25
Spinal canal diameter (mm) 13.42 ± 0.11 15.63 ± 0.18 12.61 ± 0.13 12.34 ± 0.14 12.62 ± 0.13 13.39 ± 0.18 13.87 ± 0.16
OPLL area occupying ratio 0.19 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.02 0.23 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.07
OPLL area (mm2) 40.91 ± 2.31 24.49 ± 3.08 44.15 ± 3.50 53.63 ± 3.44 53.21 ± 3.26 42.47 ± 3.27 27.42 ± 3.13
Spinal canal area (mm2) 245.7 ± 2.67 300.54 ± 4.65 232.12 ± 3.05 228.93 ± 3.12 232.10 ± 2.89 242.05 ± 4.11 238.64 ± 4.03
Multifidus fatty degeneration
Goutallier grade 1.97 ± 0.38 1.32 ± 0.09 3.00 ± 0.08 2.21 ± 0.06 1.87 ± 0.04 1.80 ± 0.04 1.63 ± 0.05
Goutallier grade
Grade 0 19 (3.2) 18 (18.0) 0 (0) 1 (1.0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Grade 1 125 (20.8) 42 (42.0) 2 (2.0) 6 (6.0) 17 (17.0) 20 (20.0) 38 (38.0)
Grade 2 345 (57.5) 32 (32.0) 28 (28.0) 65 (65.0) 79 (79.0) 80 (80.0) 61 (61.0)
Grade 3 76 (12.7) 6 (6.0) 38 (38.0) 27 (27.0) 4 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.0)
Grade 4 35 (5.8) 2 (2.0) 32 (32.0) 1 (1.0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Values are presented as mean±standard error or number (%).

OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; AP, anteroposterior.

Goutallier classification system: grade 0, normal muscle; grade 1, some fatty streaks; grade 2, less than 50% fatty muscle atrophy; grade 3, 50% fatty muscle atrophy; grade 4, greater than 50% fatty muscle atrophy.

REFERENCES

1. Matsunaga S, Sakou T. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E309-14.
pmid
2. Ikegawa S. Genetics of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine: a mini review. J Bone Metab 2014;21:127-32.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Kim KH, Kuh SU, Park JY, et al. Association between BMP-2 and COL6A1 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in Korean patients and family members. Genet Mol Res 2014;13:2240-7.
crossref pmid
4. Yan L, Gao R, Liu Y, et al. The pathogenesis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Aging Dis 2017;8:570-82.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Sato R, Uchida K, Kobayashi S, et al. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: histopathological findings around the calcification and ossification front. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:174-83.
crossref pmid
6. Epstein N. Diagnosis and surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2002;2:436-49.
crossref pmid
7. Li H, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Hormones and growth factors in the pathogenesis of spinal ligament ossification. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1075-84.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Kiss C, Szilágyi M, Paksy A, et al. Risk factors for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:27-30.
crossref pmid
9. Wilke HJ, Wolf S, Claes LE, et al. Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups. A biomechanical in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:192-8.
pmid
10. Freeman MD, Woodham MA, Woodham AW. The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review. PM R 2010;2:142-6. quiz 1 p following 167.
crossref pmid pdf
11. Jiang J, Wang H, Wang L, et al. Multifidus Degeneration, a new risk factor for lumbar spinal stenosis: a case-control study. World Neurosurg 2017;99:226-31.
crossref pmid
12. Koda M, Yoshii T, Egawa S, et al. Factors significantly associated with postoperative neck pain deterioration after surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: study of a cohort using a prospective registry. J Clin Med 2021;10:5026.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Liu S, Yang SD, Fan XW, et al. Analyses of effect factors associated with the postoperative dissatisfaction of patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty for cervical OPLL: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:161.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, et al. A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E990-3.
pmid
15. Tsuyama N. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;(184):71-84.
crossref
16. Choi YH, Lee JH, Kwon YM. Prevalence, distribution, and concomitance of whole-spine ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ossification of the ligament flavum in South Koreans: a whole-spine-ct-based cross-sectional study. Neurospine 2022;19:1108-15.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Shin JJ, Kim B, Kang J, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and genetic analyses in a population-based cohort of adult spinal deformity in the older population. Neurospine 2021;18:608-17.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Biewener AA. Locomotion as an emergent property of muscle contractile dynamics. J Exp Biol 2016;219(Pt 2):285-94.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Madaro L, Passafaro M, Sala D, et al. Denervation-activated STAT3-IL-6 signalling in fibro-adipogenic progenitors promotes myofibres atrophy and fibrosis. Nature Cell Biol 2018;20:917-27.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Huang Z, Zhong L, Zhu J, et al. Inhibition of IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway rescues denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1681.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Kosaka T, Imakiire A, Mizuno F, et al. Activation of nuclear factor kappaB at the onset of ossification of the spinal ligaments. J Orthop Sci 2000;5:572-8.
pmid
22. Won YI, Lee CH, Yuh WT, et al. Genetic odyssey to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a systematic review. Neurospine 2022;19:299-306.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
23. Tsukahara S, Ikeda R, Goto S, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha-stimulated gene-6 inhibits osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells induced by osteogenic differentiation medium and BMP-2. Biochem J 2006;398:595-603.
pmid pmc
24. Yayama T, Mori K, Saito H, et al. Cytokine profile from the ligamentum flavum in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022;47:277-85.
crossref pmid
25. Thoma A, Lightfoot AP. NF-kB and inflammatory cytokine signalling: role in skeletal muscle atrophy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018;1088:267-79.
crossref pmid
26. James G, Chen X, Diwan A, et al. Fat infiltration in the multifidus muscle is related to inflammatory cytokine expression in the muscle and epidural adipose tissue in individuals undergoing surgery for intervertebral disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2021;30:837-45.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M, Yasuda T, et al. Serum biomarkers in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): inflammation in OPLL. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174881.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Shi L, Miao J, Chen D, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress regulates mechanical stress-induced ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 2019;28:2249-56.
crossref pmid pdf
29. Yang HS, Lu XH, Chen DY, et al. Mechanical strain induces Cx43 expression in spinal ligament fibroblasts derived from patients presenting ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1459-65.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Cai HX, Yayama T, Uchida K, et al. Cyclic tensile strain facilitates the ossification of ligamentum flavum through β-catenin signaling pathway: in vitro analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E639-46.
pmid
31. Sugita D, Nakajima H, Kokubo Y, et al. Cyclic tensile strain facilitates ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament via increased Indian hedgehog signaling. Sci Rep 2020;10:7231.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
32. Wang H, Liu D, Yang Z, et al. Association of bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine and its severity in Chinese patients. Eur Spine J 2008;17:956-64.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Kopf J, Petersen A, Duda GN, et al. BMP2 and mechanical loading cooperatively regulate immediate early signalling events in the BMP pathway. BMC Biol 2012;10:37.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
34. Bian Q, Jain A, Xu X, et al. Excessive activation of TGFβ by spinal instability causes vertebral endplate sclerosis. Sci Rep 2016;6:27093.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Zhang L, Yang L, Li W, et al. Expression profile of long noncoding RNAs in cervical spondylotic myelopathy of rats by microarray and bioinformatics analysis. Genomics 2019;111:1192-200.
crossref pmid
36. Cai B, Li Z, Ma M, et al. Long noncoding RNA SMUL suppresses SMURF2 production-mediated muscle atrophy via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2021;23:512-26.
crossref pmid
37. Zhang H, Zhang Q, Yuan Z, et al. Non-coding RNAs in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Front Genet 2022;13:1069575.
crossref pmid pmc
38. Hitachi K, Honda M, Tsuchida K. The functional role of long non-coding RNA in myogenesis and skeletal muscle atrophy. Cells 2022;11:2291.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Chen Z, Zhang Y, Liang C, et al. Mechanosensitive miRNAs and bone formation. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:1684.
crossref pmid pmc
40. Momose T, Inaba Y, Choe H, et al. CT-based analysis of muscle volume and degeneration of gluteus medius in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:457.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
41. Sharma L, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, et al. Quadriceps strength and osteoarthritis progression in malaligned and lax knees. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:613-9.
crossref pmid
42. Verbunt JA, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, et al. Disuse and deconditioning in chronic low back pain: concepts and hypotheses on contributing mechanisms. Eur J Pain 2003;7:9-21.
crossref pmid
43. Pezolato A, de Vasconcelos EE, Defino HL, et al. Fat infiltration in the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles in subjects with sway-back posture. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2158-64.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
44. Bousema EJ, Verbunt JA, Seelen HAM, et al. Disuse and physical deconditioning in the first year after the onset of back pain. Pain 2007;130:279-86.
crossref pmid
45. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, et al. Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain. Spine J 2010;10:200-8.
crossref pmid
46. Doi T, Ohtomo N, Oguchi F, et al. Association between deep posterior cervical paraspinal muscle morphology and clinical features in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Global Spine J 2023;13:8-16.
crossref pmid pdf
47. Kawaguchi Y, Imagama S, Iwasaki M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of ossification of the spinal ligament, 2019. J Orthop Sci 2021;26:1-45.
crossref pmid
48. Kalichman L, Carmeli E, Been E. The association between imaging parameters of the paraspinal muscles, spinal degeneration, and low back pain. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:2562957.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
  • CGBIO
  • TOOLS
    Share :
    Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+
    METRICS Graph View
    • 1 Crossref
    •   Scopus
    • 1,994 View
    • 147 Download
    Journal Impact Factor 3.8
    SURGERY: Q1
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY: Q1
    Related articles in NS

    Genetic Odyssey to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review2022 June;19(2)

    An Age-old Debate: Anterior Versus Posterior Surgery for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament2019 September;16(3)

    Sugery of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament(OPLL) of Cervical Spine2004 March;1(1)

    Book Review: Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament2013 September;10(3)



    Editorial Office
    Department of Neurosurgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center,
    CHA University School of Medicine,
    59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13496, Korea
    Tel: +82-31-780-1924  Fax: +82-31-780-5269  E-mail: support@e-neurospine.org
    The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
    #407, Dong-A Villate 2 Town, 350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
    Tel: +82-2-585-5455  Fax: +82-2-2-523-6812  E-mail: ksns1987@gmail.com
    Business License No.: 209-82-62443

    Copyright © The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.

    Developed in M2PI

    Zoom in Close layer